Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Research Article
ISSN: 0974-6943
*Corresponding author.
Vishwanath Agrahari
College of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
RKGIT, Ghaziabad-201003, UP, India
Tel.: + 91-9871229177
E-mail:v09world@gmail.com
Fig.1.3-(1-Methyl-5-nitroimidazol-2-yl)-1-(methylsulfonyl) imidaz
olidin-2-one
used for this method. A rheodyne injector with 20 l loop was used for injecting
the sample. Shimadzu balance, AY-120 was used for weighing purpose in this
method.
2.3. Chromatographic conditions
The analysis was carried out with UV detection at 318 nm using a 20 l
injection volume. Assay was performed using a C18 reversed-phase column
eluted with Acetonitrile and water (20:80, %v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/ min.
Chromatography was carried out at ambient temperature. The solvents were
mixed, filtered t hrough a membrane filter of 0.45 micron pore and degassed in
ultrasonic bath prior to use.
2.4. Standard solution preparation
Standard stock solutions were prepared by dissolving 10 mg of satranidazole
working standard in 8.0 ml of mobile phase and diluting to 10.0 ml with the
same to obtain concentration of 1000 g/ml. It was filtered through a .22
membrane filter. The stock solution was protected from light using aluminium
foil and stored for 1 week at 40C and was found to be stable during this period.
2.5. Procedure for analysis of tablet formulation
20 Tablets of the product under study were weighed, crushed and mixed in a
mortar and pestle for 20 min. A portion of powder equivalent to the weight of
100.00mg was accurately weighed and transferred to a dry 100 ml A-grade
volumetric flask and 80 ml mobile phase was added. The volumetric flask was
sonicated for 20 min to effect complete dissolution of satranidazole and made
up to the volume with mobile phase. Suitable aliquots of solution were filtered
through a 0.45 m nylon filter. This was further diluted with mobile phase to
yield concentration of satranidazole in the range of linearity (40ppm). Each
of standard and test preparation was injected into the chromatograph and the
responses recorded.
3.0. METHOD VALIDATION
3.1. Linearity
A series of standard curves were prepared over a concentration range of 5 - 70
g/ml by diluting the standard stock solution of SAT (1mg/ml) in mobile phase.
2747-2749
3500
3.2. Precision
Precision was measured in accordance with ICH recommendations. The precision study was carried out by injecting sample preparation of 40g/ml concentration six times.
2500
3000
2000
Area
(mAU x S)
3.3. Accuracy
Recovery studies by the standard addition method were performed with a view
to justify the accuracy of the proposed method. Previously analyzed samples
SAT (40 g/ml) were spiked with known amount of standard so as to get three
different levels (80%, 100% and 120%) and the mixtures were analyzed by the
proposed method. The experiment was performed in triplicate. Recovery
(%), RSD (%) were calculated for each concentration.
3.4. Limit of detection and limit of Quantitation
In order to estimate the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation
(LOQ) values, the blank sample was injected six times and the peak area of
this blank was calculated as noise level. The LOD was calculated as three times
the noise level (S/N = 3:1) while ten times the noise level gave the LOQ (S/
N=10:1).
y = 39.742x + 45.939
R2 = 0.9986
1500
1000
500
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Concentration ( g/ml)
3.5. Ruggedness
The ruggedness of the method was demonstrated by analysis of the samples as
for precision study by a second analyst. The RSD of the two sets of data
indicates the ruggedness of the method. Further, the t-test was performed on
the data and the difference was found to be not significant.
3.6. Robustness
The robustness of the method was determined to assess the effect of small but
deliberate changes of the chromatographic conditions on the determination
of SAT. The different variations are in flow rates by 0.1 mL/min, in wavelength by 2 nm and in temperature by 5 C. The concentration of the
solution analyzed was 40 g/mL.
3.7. System suitability tests
The chromatographic systems used for analyses must pass the system suitability limits before sample analysis can commence. The capacity factor (K),
injection repeatability, tailing factor (T), theoretical plate number (N) and
resolution (Rs) for the principal peak were the parameters tested on a 40 g/
mL sample of SAT to assist the accuracy and precision of the developed HPLC
system.
3.8. Specificity
The specificity of the method was tested by chromatographing a mixture of
commonly used tablet excipients, for example starch, microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, talc, magnesium stearate, colloidal silicon dioxide, sodium starch
glycollate and comparing the chromatogram with that obtained from a mixture of drug and the same additives.
4.0. RESULTS
4.1. Linearity
Peak area versus drug concentration wa s plotted to construct a standard curve
for SAT and linearity was shown in concentration range of 5 g/ml to 70g/
ml. The polynomial regression for the calibration plots showed good linear
relationship with coefficient of correlation, r = 0.9986; slope = 39.742 and
intercept = 45.939 over the concentration range studied. Fig.2
4.2. Precision
The % assay for tablet was calculated and % RSD was found to be 0.48%.which
proved that the method was precise, as depicted in Table 1.
4.3. Accuracy
The % recovery was calculated for triplicate samples and for all levels and
mean recovery was calculated. The mean recovery was well within the acceptance limit hence the method was accurate, as depicted in Table 2.
4.4. Limit of detection and LOQ
The LOD was calculated to be .034g/ml and the LOQ was calculated to be
.106g/ml.
% Assay
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mean
SD
RSD
99.48
100.10
99.23
99.11
99.85
100.35
99.68
0.48
0.48
Theoretical
content (g/ml )
Conc. Found
(g/ml ) SD *
Recovery
(%)
RSD
(%)
80
100
120
72
80
88
71.93 0.245
80.02 0.340
87.95 0.315
99.8
100.5
99.9
0.12
0.14
0.13
*n=3
Table 3: Ruggedness Analysis
Analyst 1
Sample
% Assay
Analyst 2
Sample
% Assay
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mean
SD
RSD
100.04
100.22
99.84
100.35
100.67
100.41
100.25
.289
.29
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mean
SD
RSD
99.89
100.06
100.45
99.78
100.07
99.49
99.95
.476
.48
2747-2749
three levels (80, 100 and 120 %) showed below 2.0% and precision was found
to be 0.48. The method was also found to be robust as there was no significant
change in the peak area, peak shape and retention time of SAT. Furthermore,
the low values of LOD and LOQ indicate that the method can be employed
over a wide concentration range for linearity. The system suitability tests
performed verified the resolution, column efficiency and repeatability of the
chromatographic system
6.0. CONCLUSION
The HPLC method developed is accurate, precise, reproducible and specific.
The method is linear over a wide range, economical and utilizes a mobile phase
which can be easily prepared. All these factors make this method suitable for
quantification of SAT in bulk drugs and in pharmaceutical dosage forms. The
method developed was then subjected to validation as per ICH guidelines and
showed that method is linear, precise, accurate and rugged.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to M/s Alkem Laboratories Limited, Baddi, India, for
the gift of SAT.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5.0. DISCUSSION
Satranidazole, a weak acid, is sparingly soluble in water. The final decision on
mobile phase composition and flow rate was made on the basis of peak shape,
peak area, tailing factor, baseline drift, ease of preparation, use of readily
available cost-effective solvents and time required for analysis. Initial trial
experiments were conducted, with a view to select a suitable solvent system
for the accurate estimation of the drug. These included methanolwater,
methanolacetonitrile-water and acetonitrilewater in different ratio. Flow
rates between 0.5 and 1.2ml/min were studied. A mobile phase system comprising of acetonitrile-water (20:80 % v/v) was found to be optimum and a flow
rate of 1.0 ml/min gave an optimal peak shape and was selected. The same
solvent mixture was used for the extraction of the drug from the formulation
containing excipients. No internal standard was used because no extraction or
separation step was involved. The solvents were mixed, filtered through a
membrane filter of 0.45 micron pore and degassed in ultrasonic bath prior to
use. Using a reversed-phase C18 column, the retention times for satranidazole
was observed to be 6.13 min. Total time of analysis was kept 8.0 min. The
maximum absorption of satranidazole was detected at 318 nm and this wavelength was chosen for the analysis. (Fig3) The developed method was linear
showing the coefficient of correlation of 0.9986. % RSD of accuracy study for
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Zahoor A, Knight R C, Whitty P, Edwards DL, Satranidazole: mechanism of action on DNA and
structure -activity correlations, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 18, 1986, 17-25.
http://sci-toys.com/scichem/jqp016/41841.html.
Bhatia SC, Shanbhag VD, Electron-capture gas chromatographic assays of 5-nitro- imidazole
class of antimicrobials in blood, Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 305, 1984, 325-334.
Mruthyunjayaswamy BHM, Patil SMM, Raju SA, Spectrophotometric methods for the estimation of Satranidazole in pharmaceutical formulations, Indian J Pharm Sci. 63, 2001, 433-436.
Raju SA, Shobha M, Manjunath S, Spectrophotometric determination of satranidazole in bulk drug
and formulations, Asian J Chem., 14 (1), 2002, 520- 522.
Wankhede SB, Prakash A, Chitlange SS, Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of
satranidazole in tablet dosage form, Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 1(4), 2008, 441-443.
Wankhede SB, Prakash A, Chitlange SS, Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of ofloxacin
and satranidazole in tablet dosage form, Asian J. Research Chem.1 (1), 2008, 9-11.
Lalla J, Hamrapurkar P, Anu R, Wadhwa T, High-performance thin-layer chromatographic
determination of satranidazole in its dosage form, Journal of Planar Chromatography -Modern
TLC, 16(6), 2003,447-450.
Patel MB, Patel KM, Patel GS, Suhagia BN, Prajapati AM, Development and validation of a
stability-indicating hptlc-densitometric method for Satranidazole, Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 30(16), 2007, 2459 2471.
Natarajan S and Raman B., HPLC determination of satranidazole in bulk and pharmaceutical
dosage forms, Asian J Chem. 2008; 20(3): 1833-1840.
Prashant B, Sanjay A, Mrinalini D, Rahul G, A Validated RP-HPLC method for simultaneous
estimation of ofloxacin and satranidazole from tablets, Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 7(2),
2008,70-72.
Shinde RS, Suvarna IB, Namdev SP, Suman BY, Ashok MB, Simultaneous estimation of satranidazole
and ofloxacin in tablet dosage form by high performance liquid chromatography, E-Journal of
Chemistry, 7(1), 2010, 198-202.
Boopathy D, Prakash M, Mathew B, Kumar SS, Perumal P, Method development and validation
of simultaneous determination of Ofloxacin and Satranidazole in pharmaceutical dosage form by
RP-HPLC, Der Pharmacia Letter, 2(2), 2010, 22-26.
General Chapter 1225, Validation of compendial methods, USP 30, National Formulary 25,Rockville,
Md., USA, The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., (2007).
ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline- Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2 (R1) Nov 2005.
2747-2749