Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1, FEBRUARY 2000
129
Abstract-Advanced load flow models for the static VAR cumpensator (SVC) are presented in this paper. The models are incorporated into existing load flow (LF) and optimal power flow (OPF)
Newton algorithms. Unlike SVC models available in open literature, the new models depart from the generator representation of
the SVC and are based instead on the variable shunt susceptance
concept. In particular, a SVC model which uses the firing angle
as the state variable provides key information for cases when the
load flow solution is used to initialize other power system appliedtions, e.g., harmonic analysis. The SVC state variables are combined with the nodal voltage magnitudes and angles of the network in a single frame-of-reference fur U unified, iterative solution
through Newton methods. Both algorithms, the LF and the OPF
exhibit very strong convergence characteristics, regardless of network size and the number of controllable devices. Results are presented which demonstrate the prowess of the new SVC models.
Index Terms-FACTS, Newton method, OPF, SVC, voltage control.
I. INTRODUCTION
N ELECTRIC power systems, nodal voltages are significantly affected by load variations and by network topology
changes. Voltages can drop considerably and even collapse
when the network is operating under heavy loading. This
may trigger the operation of under-voltage relays and other
voltage sensitive controls, leading to extensive disconnection
of loads and thus adversely affecting consumers and company
revenue. On the other hand, when the load level in the system
is low, over-voltages can arise due to Ferranti effect. Capacitive over-compcnsation and over-excitation of synchronous
machines can also occur [I]. Over-voltages cause equipment
failures due to insulation breakdown and produce magnetic
saturation in transformers, rcsulting in harmonic generation.
Hence, voltage magnitudc throughout the network cannot
deviate significantly from its nominal value if an efficient and
reliable operation of the power system is to bc achieved.
Voltage regulation is achieved by controlling the production,
absorption and flow of reactive power throughout the network.
Reactive power flows are minimized so as to reduce system
losses. Sources and sinks of reactive power, such as shunt capacitors, shunt reactors, rotating synchronous condensers and
SVCs are used for this purpose. Shunt capacitors and shunt
Manuscript received December 8, 1997; revised September 30,1998. H. Ambriz-P6rez and C. R. Fuerte-Esqoivel were financially supported hy the Consejo
Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologiil, MCxica.
H. Ambriz-PCrw and E. Acha are with the Department of Electronics and
Electrical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
C. R. Fuerte-Esquivel is with the Departamentu de Ingenieria EICctrica y
Electrhica, Institute Tccnol6gico de M a r c h , Mexico.
Publishcr Item Identifier S 0885-8950(110)01862-9.
XC
Fig. I .
-E
-6"
4
60 40
0.0 '
0
\
Capacitive region
90
A . ,
100 110
120 1
140
- -
-0.4
Reactive region
20 -
o-
-20 -
0
c
3
.f
-40 -
0.1 r
FEBRUARY 20110
SVC stmctiirc.
fi'
VOL. I S , NO. I ,
Capacitive region
w
LT
-60
1,
, , ,
,
, , ,
90 100 110 120 130
40
AMBRIZPkREZ ctnl.: ADVANCE0 SVC MOUE1.S FOR NEWTON-RAPHSON LOAD FLOW AND NEWTON OPTIMAL POWER FLOW STUDIES
v4
131
112r
-&?
'
I
System reactive
eg
110-
108-
- Generator model
---
Susceptonce model
,
,
/'
106104
/'
//
102100
characteristics
Capacitive
ratine
Ir
Inductive
rating
IMlN
Is
IM4X
- Rfixcd vb2.
(4)
= jov,
(4)
Q , = -v;u.
(3
Linearized,
positive
sequence
SVC
models
for
Newton-Raphson load flows are presentcd in this section
whereas SVC models optimal power flows are presented in
Scction V.
A . SVC Total Suscnptance Model ( H = BSVC;)
The linearized equation ofthe SVCis given by (6), wherc the
total susceptance BSVCis taken to be the state variable,
I12
where
iti
4-ACV
(10)
v. L O A D FLOWTESTCASE
The implemeiitation of the variahlc shunt susceptance models
in a Newlon-Raphson load flow program has required the inAn ohject oriented, Newton-Raphson load flow program
corporation of a nonstandard type of bus, namcly P V B . This [61 has been extended in order to incorporate the models and
is a controlled bus where the nodal voltage inagnitiide and ac- methods presented above. A real life power network, consisting
tive and rcactive powers are specified whilst either the SVCs of 166 buses, 108 transmission lines and 128 transformers [7],
firing anglc (I or the SVCs total susceptance Usvc are handled has been used to show the capab es of the proposcd SVC
~ ~within
~ ~ limits, the specified models.
as state variables. If a or l l s arc
voltagc magnitude is atlained and the coiitrolled bus remains
Three SVCs have been embedded in key locations ofthe netIVD-type. However, i i CY or Dsv,: go out of limits, they are work, resulting in significant improvement of the voltage magfixed at the violatcd limit and tlie bus becomes PCJ-type. This nitude profile. The SVCs were set to control nodal voltage magis, of course, i n the absence of other FACTS devices capable o l nitude at I p.u. The relevant SVCs parameters are given in
providing reactive power support.
Section 11.
AMRKIZPEREZ eta!.: ADVANCE0 SVC MODELS FOR NF.WTON~RAP1iSONLOAD Fl.OW AND NEWTON OPTIMAL POWER PLOW STUDIFS
static VAR
Compensator
SVCl
svc2
svc3
susceptance
Model
Bsvc @.U,)
0.2378
0.0848
0.1709
133
Firing angle
model
a (degrees)
Bdp.u.)
136.038
0.2378
136.016
0.0848
136.028
0.1709
h(h,
A) = XqrBr
(1 1)
PI,
[1/1
L
-
lteroiions
[WI[Azl
(12)
134
TAULE If
OWIMAI. GENERATION
COST AND SYSrF.M LOSSES
Base
Susceptance
Model
264.135
13.47
CaSe
aL
-~
cost (Sh)
Losses (MW)
- I
264.137
13.48
asi,
Firing angle
model
264.136
13.475
TABLE Ill
a I,
SVC MOIX1.S
--
aC%
I Staticvm I
--BL
Compensator
ilX,i
svc 1
--d L
svc2
a&
- aL
_
-
act
svc3
~usceptanc
e Model
Bsvc (P.U.)
0.1905
0.0754
0.1194
Firing angle
model
a (degrees)
Blb(P.U.)
136.28
0.1908
136.11
0.0751
136.18
0.1242
(1 8)
wheregi(x) isthestatevariablevalue, i.e., Hsvc orru,attheend
of each iteration. 4 and g are the maximum and minimum limits
of the SVC state variable. p is a multiplier term and c is a pcnalty
term that adapts itself in order to force inequality constraints
within limits while minimising the objective function.
D. Lugrange Multiplier
The Lagrange multiplier for active and reactive powcr flow
mismatch equations are initialized at 1 and 0, respectively. For
the SVC Lagrangc multiplier the initial valiic of A,,, is set equal
to 0.
E. SVC Control of Voltage Magnitude ut a Fixed Value
(14)
3;)' i f p i + c ( g i ( z )
c
+,(Si(xj
B ~ >_) o
- G ) ~ i f p i + c(s;(z)- 9 . ) 2 U
-%
The optimal generation cost for the base and modified cases
(SVC upgraded) are given in Table 11, together with system
losses. The optimal susceptance values of SVC's are given in
Table 111. The SVC's were embedded in nodes with low voltage
ADVANCED svc MODEIS FOR NEWTON-RAPHSON MAD FLOW AND NEWTON OPTIMAL POWER FLOW STUDIES
AMBRIZ-PBRBZ
135
TABLE 1V
COMPARISON OmlMAL SUSCEPPANCE FOR BOTH
1
300 -
290 -
.+s
D
280 -
2."
Firing angle
t
?!
2
a
270 -
250.
?.
4'
0.2150
0.0741
0.1376
0.2151
0.0741
0.1377
'
1
'
2
'
'
'
TABLE V
OI'TIMAL GENERATION COST ANU SYSTEM LOSSES
cost (Sib)
Fig. 7 . Active power generiltion cos1 p r ~ f i l ~ s
34
32 30-
14
---
&40'00
Susceptance
case
264.136
Model
Firingangle
model
264.134
264.134
I 7 475
11AKl
1.021L-12.23
I
6141.736
+
Fig. 9. Comparison between the g e w m o v and susceptiince SVC ,nod& for
the case when u p p limits
~
have bcen reached.
1 2 5 r - 7
Base
1.018L-12.23
I
- Base case
'
3
"
"
"
'
Iterations
Fig. X.
136.32
136.10
136.20
260 -
lterotions
'
SVC MODELS
In order to show the limitations of the generator representation of an SVC, compared to the two SVC models introduced
in this paper, a case is presented below where the SVC hits its
upper reactive limit. SVC 1 was assumed to have a 40 MVAR
upperlimit. Fig. 9 shows thereactive powers contributed by both
models, where the network losses objective function was minimized. It can be observed that the reactive powers drawn by bath
SVC models differ. The reason is that the reactive power is not
really constant, as taken to be by the generator representation,
but afunction of nodal voltage magnitude, as correctly indicated
116
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
H. Ambriz-PBrez would like to thank Comisi6n Federal de
Electricidad, MBxico for granting him study leave to carry out
Ph.D. studies at the University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
REFERHNCES
sciencc, 1982.
141 IEEE Special Stability Controls Working Glaup, Working Group 38-01,
Task Force No. 2 an SVC, "Static VAR compensator models for power
flow and dynamic performance simulation," IEEE T,una. on Po'owrr Syrtems, vol. 9, no. I, pp. 229-240, Feb. 1995.
151 J. 1. Rico, E. Acha, and 1:J. H. Miller, 'Harmunic dainain modelling of
I61
171
181
I91
I101
[I 11
It. Aeha
C. R. Focrte-Esqaivel was barii in Mexico in 1964. He received the B.Eng. degree (Hans) from Institute Tecnol6gicn de M a r c h , Mexico i n 1990, the MSc.
degree 1wm lnstiluto Politecnico Naciunal, Mexico in 1993, and thc Ph.D degree from the University dGlasgaw, Scotland, UK, in lY97. He is currently :NI
Assistant Professor at thc Institute TecnolOgico de M a r c h His main research
interests lie oil the dynamic and steady-state analysis of FACTS, custom power,
and real-time modeling and analysis.