HEAVYLIFTANALYSIS

HEAVY
LIFT ANALYSIS
USINGMULTITIERRIGGINGSYSTEM
PresentedinSciCOP
March30th ,2012
Presentedby:
ABRAHAMIMAMMUTTAQIN

PRESENTATIONOUTLINE

CriticalLiftPlanning
Critical Lift Check List
CriticalLiftCheckList
HeavyLiftandItsAssociatedDesignTasks
LiftingArrangement
Ri i A
RiggingArrangement
t
3DComputerModel
MethodologyofDefiningLiftPointsLocation
SlingLoadsCalculationResult
UnityCheckandMaxDeflectionSummary
Miscellaneous Calculation
MiscellaneousCalculation
Summary

CRITICALLIFTPLANNING

WHATISTHECHECKLISTFORCRITICALLIFT?

HEAVYLIFTANDITSASSOCIATEDDESIGNTASKS

HEAVYLIFTUSINGMULTITIERRIGGINGSYSTEM

LIFTINGARRANGEMENT(PLANVIEW)

Check this !

LIFTINGARRANGEMENT(ELEVATIONVIEW)

Check this !

CRANEBARGE MOORINGARRANGEMENT

RIGGINGARRANGEMENT

3DCOMPUTERMODEL

10

COMPUTERMODEL(CONTD)

38.5 M

54 M
See the breakdown !

11

LIFTWEIGHTBREAKDOWNDETAILS

ITEM
1

FINAL WEIGHT
(MT)

FINAL WEIGHT (MT),

(incl. 10% cont. factor, for lifting
analysis and AH II lifting wt)

1003.14

1103.45

1003.14

1103.45

4.067

4.47

74.60

82.06

2.050

2.26

36.200

39.82

116.92

128.61

Instrument Items
Field run & support

1.92

2.00

Electrical Items
Lighting & Receptacle Supports
Field run supports
Cable Ladder Supports
Cable ladder
Sub-total

1.78
1.43
19.98
2.70
25.89

1.96
1.57
21.98
2.97
28.48

Scaffolding
Scaffolding below JM

13.80

15.18

1161.67

1277.72

DESCRIPTION
Structural, includes;
Primary framing & node
Secondary framing & equip. support
D k iinfill
Deck
fill lleg (12 nos.))
Crane pedestal
Deck plating
Drain box and support trimmers
Handrailing & stair landing
Sub-total

Piping spool & supports

Piping Spools
Pipe supports (below JM) for Area-E1,
Area-E2, portion of Area-E3 & portion of
Area-E4
Pipe
p supports
pp
on top
p of JM
Added pipe supports to replace scaffold
weight allocation
Sub-total

TOTAL WT. JM SECTION

12

METHODOLOGYOFDEFININGLIFTPOINTSLOCATION

To have equal loads on

the slings,
slings Roller Sheave
shall be installed at this
points !

KEY NOTE : TO HAVE AN EQUAL LOAD ON THE SLINGS, ANGLE7 = ANGLE8

(WHICH ENABLED SLING TENSION EQUALISATION FOR THE DOUBLED SLINGS)

13

ROLLERSHEAVEDETAILS

14

SLINGLOADSCALCULATIONRESULT

PAIR SLINGS MUST

HAVE EQUAL LOADS !

15

UNITYCHECK RESULT

The maximum deflection is found 180mm at joint 350

while the deflection at lift point (j
(joint 237)) is 116mm.
Hence, the actual deflection at structure during
stacking is 64mm.

MEMBER
NO.

SECTION

UNITY
CHECK
(MAX.)

431

PG1600 x 628

0.75

2091

PG1600 x 628

0.75

2090

PG1600 x 628

0.56

2094

PG1600 x 628

0.61

2093

PG1600 x 628

0.78

2097

PG1600 x 628

0.52

2063

PG1600 x 490

0.59

2060

PG1600 x 490

0 62
0.62

2072

PG1600 x 490

0.63

2074

PG1600 x490

0.63

16

MISCELLANEOUSCALCULATION

17

THELIFTINGPROCESS

18

SUMMARY

Properselectionofriggingschemeforgivenmodulestructureand
designofliftpointsisESSENTIALforsuccessfulliftinstallation
Flexible module requires more lift points (in this case is SIX lift
Flexiblemodulerequiresmoreliftpoints(inthiscaseisSIXlift
points)tobeprovidedsuchthatariggingsystemwithmultipletiers
ofdoubledslingsminimizedtheDISTORTIONduringlifting
Examples :
Examples:
MalampayaWeatherDeckrequirestwelves(12)liftpoints
(Decksize45mWx90mL,LiftWeight=1100MT)
JMPTTPArthitDeckrequiressix(6)liftpoints
(Decksize38.5mWx54mL,LiftWeight=1279MT)
ThesheavesystemmustbeSMOOTHwhichminimizethefrictional
effectonthedoubledslings
Rollersheavesystemgivesbenefitofoptimizedtheriggingsystem
insteadofusingspreaderbeam/frameanddemonstratesbetter
structuralbehaviour
19