Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A.
Project Title
B.
C.
Project Location
Project Category
(rehabilitation or new
construction)
Project Scale/Dimension
Project Proponent
Implementing Unit
Concreting
:
:
:
38 Barangays
By Contract
1,068.5 hectares
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
1,078.5 hectares
Barangay
No. of
has.
Aloran
Zamora
80
Culpan
300
3
3
Balintonga
191
2.5
17
Sinampong
an
200
Crop
Cocon
ut
Cocon
ut
Corn
Banan
a
Cocon
ut
Banan
a
Cassav
a
Cocon
ut
Roxas
Oroquieta
City
Kinawanga
n
Total
J
20
130
10
Corn
Rubber
Cocon
ut
112
Rubber
1068.5
528 households
2,410 population; M= 1,460 ;
F= 950
________ farming households;
no of farmers=
___543__Indigenous People
(IP);
M = 265; F = 278
_________ Non-IP
K.
:
:
L.
M.
Economic Indicators
1)Economic Net Present
Value (ENPV)
2)Economic Internal Rate of
Return
3)Benefit Cost Ratio
Conclusion and
Recommendations
I.
Introduction
a. Provincial Background
i. Demographics
P______________________
WB Loan Proceeds: P______
GoP : P______
LGU Equity : P______
:
_________
__________
__________
a statement as to whether or
not the project has been found
feasible from the marketing,
technical,
economic
and
operational view point.
OLD
COMPOSITE
INDEX
0.5761
0.6722
0.6435
0.5838
OLD
RANK
15
3
8
13
NEW
COMPOSI
TE INDEX
0.67084
0.56655
0.52957
0.5232
NEW
RANK
1
2
3
4
OROQUIETA CITY
DON VICTORIANO
CHIONGBIAN
LOPEZ JAENA
PLARIDEL
CALAMBA
TANGUB CITY
OZAMIS CITY
TUDELA
SINACABAN
BALIANGAO
PANAON
JIMENEZ
CLARIN
0.6049
0.503
10
17
0.52191
0.49987
5
6
0.6938
0.7263
0.6629
0.6532
0.6558
0.5912
0.6058
0.6515
0.5988
0.5584
0.5805
2
1
4
6
5
12
9
7
11
16
14
0.49469
0.4609
0.45895
0.4487
0.44733
0.44573
0.43216
0.42964
0.42524
0.40895
0.40262
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Farmers are mostly smallholders with average farm size of 1.53.0 hectares Farms in Bukidnon are generally bigger than those
in other regions/provinces. Big rubber plantations are owned by
processors, trader-exporters, cooperatives, and wealthy families.
The larger processors have their own nurseries and farms are
more input intensive. (VCA- Rubber DA., 2014)
II.
The Subproject
a. The Road Influence Area (Responsible Component/Unit to
review: GGU and Econ)
i. Location (Brief description in 1-2 paragraphs)
(Responsible Component/Unit to review: Econ &
GGU)
a. Geographic boundaries (Responsible
Component/Unit to review: GGU)
The proposed road project is in the Municipality
of Aloran located in the central coastal part of the
province of Misamis Occidental, Mindanao,
Philippines. It lies within 8 0 18 to 8 0 20
north latitude and 123 0 43 to 123 0 40 east
longitude. It has a total of 38 barangays with
three barangays comprising the town center while
the rest are rural barangays. It is bounded on the
North by Oroquieta City, on the west by the
municipality of Concepcion, on the south by the
municipality of Pana-on and on the east by the
tranquil Iligan Bay.
b. Relative distance to growth and commercial
centers (Responsible Component/Unit to
review: GGU)
The municipality of Aloran is approximately 8.7
kilometers or 5-10 minutes by public transport
from the Provincial Capital, Oroquieta City while
Ozamis City, the trade and business center of the
province is 33.6 kilometers to the south or around
40 minutes away by bus ride. Cagayan de Oro
City, its regional center is approximately 173.6
kilometers away or roughly six hours of land
travel with an average of 20 to 30-minute
IV.
Road
Classificatio
n
Brgy/FMR
Municipal
Provincial
12.7
kms
Not
Passabl
e
Passabl
e
Not
Passabl
e
Passabl
e
2.0
km
0.30
km
Not
Passabl
e
Total
Passabl
e
Not
Passabl
e
13.0
km
2.0
km
National
Total
Note: The road network planning will best illustrate the supply and
demand gap analysis
The proposed road subproject is an existing provincial road
of 15 km length which has a carriageway surface of 0.30 km
concrete, 12.7 km gravel and 2.0 km earth. The project starts at
a junction along the national highway where there is a bridge
that crosses the Pines River which is just a few meters away from
the said junction. The most commonly used transport system is
motorcycle called locally as habal-habal, though there are other
few transport system like trucks, vans and balik-balik available in
the area aside from animal transport like horse, cattle and
carabao.
ii. Describe the current road network condition in the project
influence area vis-a-vis accessibility of the road to market
centers/trading points (specify also major market for
products) (Responsible Component/Unit to review:
GGU & Econ)
The existing road has a 2.0 km portion with earth
surface which render this part of the road difficult to
traverse during rainy season. As this road is connected to
the national highway, farmers can opt to sell their farm
produce in the local market in Aloran, in Oroquieta City or
even to Ozamis City.
1 Demand Side- from the supply side or current road network by type and
classification in terms of total kilometres, what now are the total kilometres
per road type of the desired road network after lining several proposals for
PRDP funding. For new construction, there will be increase in length of
concrete roads however for rehabilitation, there will just be increase in
concrete road length and an equivalent reduction in either earth or gravel
road length or decrease in both types to be shown in the table.
even
2.
3.
% WT.
QUANTIT
Y
1.56%
10.00
102(2)a
3.42%
22,053.49
CU.M.
103(1)a
1.74%
12,243.69
CU.M.
104(1)b
0.11%
748.92
CU.M.
100
SCOPE OF WORKS
UNIT
ha.
UNIT
PRICE
185,407.2
8
184.4
2
169.3
7
170.4
7
TOTAL
1,854,072.7
8
4,067,188.4
4
2,073,663.9
0
127,671.3
9
105(1)
19.4
1,605,525.8
1
CU.M.
1,127.8
4
25,332,243.9
3
49,396.08
Sq.m.
1,318.1
3
65,110,475.6
9
0.29%
63.00
LN.M.
0.23%
7.00
each
Stone Masonry
14.53%
4,531.00
cu.m.
5,460.8
1
39,043.1
3
3,813.0
0
18,069.3
8
344,031.2
4
273,301.9
3
17,276,705.8
3
379,456.8
8
6,992.0
0
146,832.0
0
292,311.6
0
292,311.6
0
1.35%
82,738.04
sq.m.
21.31%
22,460.84
311(1)a
54.77%
500(1)c
502(2)
506
201
SPL-1
0.32%
21.00
mos.
SPL-2
0.12%
21.00
mos.
SPL-3
Mobilization/Demobilization
0.25%
1.00
L.s
100%
118,883,481.42
PPMIU HEAD
SUPPORT UNITS
I-PLAN UNIT
I-BUILD UNIT
I-REAP UNIT
PROCUREMENT
SES
FINANCE
MONITORING &
EVAL
INFOACE
6.
7.
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Coconut
Orchard
Banana
Cassava
Vegetabl
es
226.15
11.41
2.50
17.0
1.15
6.60
sacks
769 boxes
865 boxes
20 tons
6
1
2
1
4 sacks
16 bags
5 bags
6 sacks
2. Culpan
Coconut
Corn
Fruit
Trees
Banana
Vegetabl
es
323.29
3.75
7.75
3.0
3.0
6.60
sacks
3.5t/70
sacks
769 boxes
865 boxes
6
2
1
2
4 sacks
4 sacks
16 bags
5 bags
Rice
Coconut
Corn
Fruit
Trees
Banana
13.81
159.10
2.83
10.0
0.50
90 sacks
6.6 sacks
70 sacks
769 boxes
865 boxes
2
6
2
1
2
6 bags
4 sacks
4 sacks
16 bags
5 bags
Rice
Coconut
Corn
Fruit
21.92
327.29
137.54
4.3
90 sacks
6.60
sacks
3.5t/70
2
6
2
1
6 bags
4 sacks
4 sacks
16 bags
3. Zamora
4.
Sinamponga
n
1 bag
(18kls)
1 bag
1 bag
(18kls)
1 bag
1
bag(18kl
40 sacks
769
boxes
1,730
boxes
400
sacks
99%
90%
70%
80%
40 sacks
140
sacks
769
boxes
1,730
boxes
99%
90%
90%
70%
180
sacks
40 sacks
140
sacks
769
boxes
1,730
boxes
180
sacks
40 sacks
140
70%
99%
90%
90%
70%
70%
99%
90%
90%
Trees
Banana
1.50
sacks
769 boxes
865 boxes
5 bags
s)
sacks
769
boxes
1,730
boxes
70%
Population
Number
Number
of HH
Ave. Annual
Population
Growth Rate
(in %)
Economical
ly Active
Population
(in %)
791
558
498
563
181
144
97
106
(0.376)
3.04
4.14
0.54
64.60
56.27
65.06
56.48
w/in direct
RIA
1. Zamora
2. Culpan
3. Balintonga
4.Sinampongan
Existin
g Mode
of
Transpo
rt in
the
Area
No. of
vehicle
Units
1. Zamora
Motorcycl
e
(habalhabal)
Truck
Vans
Motorcycl
e (Habalhabal)
Tricycle
Truck
Balik-balik
19
301
4
8
144
192
31
301
7
2
4
240
144
192
Motorcycl
e (Habalhabal)
Balik-balik
Truck
21
1
1
2.Culpan
3.Balinton
ga
Averag
Ave.
e
loading
Operati capacit
ng
y
Days
(in
per
kilogra
year
ms)
Averag
e No. of
daily
trips
Observed
Transport
Fares for
Passenge
r/Cargo
Averag
e
Travele
d
Distanc
e3
100 kgs
14
1.7 kms
10,000
kgs
2,953 kgs
100 kgs
3
4
5
3
4
301
250 kgs
10,000
kgs
500 kgs
100 kgs
192
144
500 kgs
10,000
4
3
1.7 kms
1.7 kms
25
3 kms.
3 kms
3 kms
3 kms
30
5 kms
5 kms.
5 kms
2 If traffic survey is done along the proposed road site or adjacent existing
road. This may be done through classified manual count and roadside origindestination
3 The proposed road length divided by two.
4.
Sinampo
ngan
Motorcycl
e (Habalhabal)
Service
Vehicle
17
301
kgs
100kgs
144
2,953 kgs
65
12 kms
12 kms
Barangay
Type of
Animal/Human
1. Zamora
Carabao/cattle
2. Culpan
3. Balintonga
4.
Sinampongan
Carabao/Horse/Cattl
e
Carabao/Horse/Cattl
e
Carabao/Cattle/Hors
e
Origin to
Destinatio
n
Boundary
Zamora to
Natl.
Highway
Boundary
Culpan to
Natl.
Highway
Boundary
Balintonga to
Natl.
Highway
Boundary
Sinampongan
to Natl.
Highway
Transpor
t
Distanc
e
1. 7 kms.
3 kms
Transpo
rt Price
55.00
160.00
5 kms.
270.00
12 kms.
660.00
Ave.loadi
ng
capacity
2 sacks @
40-50
kls./sack
2 sacks @
40-50
kls./sack
2 sacks @
40-50
kls./sack
2 sacks @
40-50
kls./sack
Travel
time WP
(one way,
in
minutes)
No. of
trips per
person
per day
No. of
workin
g days
% Share
of Saved
Time for
Work
Average
Daily
Wage
Rate
1. Zamora
10 min.
5 min.
261
50
250.00
2. Culpan
3.Balintonga
4.Sinampong
an
15 min.
35 min.
7 min
20 min.
1
1
261
261
46
57
250.00
250.00
1 hr.
30 min.
261
50
250.00
Barangay
Crop
Potentia
l Land
for
Cultivati
on (Ha)
Farm
Gate
Price
(Php/sac
k)
Land
Developme
nt cost per
Ha
(Php/Ha)
Productio
n cost per
Ha
(Php/Ha)
Marketing
cost per
sack
(Php/sack)
1. Zamora
Banan
a
Cassa
va
Banan
a
Cassa
va
Cassa
va
Banan
a
Banan
a
Cassa
va
10 has.
10 has.
750.00
150.00
10,000.00
15,000.00
47,300.00
24,350.00
1,000/sack
250/sack
10 has.
10 has.
750.00
150.00
10,000.00
15,000.00
47,300.00
24,350.00
1,000/sack
250/sack
10 has.
15 has.
150.00
750.00
15,000.00
10,000.00
24,350.00
47,350.00
250.00/sack
1,000.00/sack
10 has.
20 has.
750.00
150.00
10,000.00
15,000.00
47,350.00
24,350.00
1,000.00/sack
250.00/sack
2.Culpan
3.Balintonga
4.Sinampong
an
The four barangays directly within the RIA have potential land for the
cultivation of Banana and Cassava. In view of this, the MAO of the
municipality of Aloran had encouraged the Barangay Captains of the four
barangays to increase their plantation for banana and cassava which was
afforded with a positive response by the four Barangay Captains.
-
Barangay
Crop/
Fish/Forest
Market
Price
(Php/klg)
Estimated
Reduction in
transport Losses
(in %)
1. Zamora
Mango
Coconut
Banana
30.00
34.00
15.00
3%
1%
5%
2. Culpan
Vegetables
Coconut
Corn
Banana
25.00
34.00
14.00
15.00
3.Balintonga
Vegetables
Coconut
Banana
Coconut
Corn
Banana
Vegetables
25.00
34.00
15.00
34.00
14.00
15.00
25.00
4.Sinampongan
3%
1%
1%
5%
3%
1%
5%
1%
1%
5%
3%
Year
Total Investment
Cost
PhP 118,883,481.42
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Operating and
Maintenance
Cost
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
PhP
211,958.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
339,133.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
339,133.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
339,133.00
211,958.00
211,958.00
Total Costs
PhP
118,883,481.42
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 339,133.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 339,133.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 339,133.00
PhP 211,958.00
PhP 211,958.00
Materials /a
Equipment /b
Labor:
Skilled
12%
1,916,089.58
Unskilled /c
Subtotal Labor
Total Base/Direct Cost
Overhead, Contingencies and Miscellaneous
(OCM) /d
Contractor's Profit /e
Total (Base/Direct Cost+OCM+CP)
Taxes /f
FS and DED Preparation+ Engineering
Supervision /g
Total Cost
Conversion factors
1,553,366.67
65,589,020.30
22,430,546.67
1,916,089.58
0.6
932,020.00
2,848,109.58
90,867,676.56
12%
7,911,500.54
7,876,338.31
3,469,456.25
98,454,228.92
8,860,880.60
7,876,338.31
Economic Cost
115,191,447.84
106,655,515.41
13,822,973.74
0.00
9,845,422.89
138,859,844.47
12%
8,790,556.15
115,446,071.56
Base
Scena
rio
Costs Increase
+10
%
+20
%
+50
%
Increase of
Benefits
+10
%
+20
%
Decrease of
Benefits
+30
%
10%
20%
30%
Delay of
Benefits
1
year
2
years
No
Benefits
deriving
from new
agri. land
EIRR
ENPV
(000PhP)
BCR
The sensitivity analysis provides robust results for the subproject with
different scenarios like cost increase, increase of benefits, decrease of
benefits and delay of benefits.
vii. List of the attached Models/Detailed Tables of EFA
Template (Responsible Component/Unit to review:
Econ)
The following list of detailed tables of Economic
Financial Analysis Templates hereby attached to ensure the
validity of the computations presented:
1. Table 1
Computation of Economic Cost of
Subproject
The financial cost of the sub project is
converted to economic cost based on several
assumptions found at the footnotes.
2. Table 2
Investment and Maintenance Costs
The table shows the computation of investment
with maintenance in a 20-year period.
3. Table 3a Annual Road Maintenance Unit Cost
This shows the annual road maintenance unit
cost for the PCCP.
4. Table 3b Annual Maintenance Cost
This shows the computation of annual
maintenance in 20-year period with capital
maintenance every sixth year.
5. Table 4 Benefits Vehicle Operating Cost Savings
The benefits derived from vehicle operating
cost mostly came from motorcycle with
xxxxxxx and the least type of transportation is
cars/vans with xxxxxxxx. The VOC difference is
derived from Gravel-Paved.
6. Table 5a Benefits Savings in Output Hauling
The commodity with the most savings is
coconut with xxxxx.
7. Table 5b Benefits Savings in Input Hauling
The commodity with the most savings is still
coconut with xxxxxx.
8. Table 6 Benefits Savings in travel time for
Commuters
The time savings for commuters is 30 minutes
with 60 minutes travel time before which
means a reduction of 50% in travel time.
9. Table 7 Benefits Newly Cultivated Agricultural Land
(optional)
The area is suitable for expansion of the
commodity
10.
Table 8 Benefits Reduction in Post-Harvest
Losses
The commodity with the highest post-harvest
savings is coconut with xxxxxx
11.
Table 9 Economic Analysis
The economic net present value at 15% is
xxxxxxxxx, economic internal rate of return of
xxxx and benefit-cost ratio of xxx.
12.
Table 10 Sensitivity Analysis