Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.elsevier.com/locate/tws
Abstract
Fiber reinforced polymer composites (FRPC) have established a strong position as an effective mean for the repair and rehabilitation of infrastructure. However, the use of FRP in the
repair and rehabilitation of pipelines is a new concept that has the potential to improve the
way we repair pipelines. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the benefits of using FRPC
and to provide stress expressions on the interaction between the different stresses exerted on
pipe walls and the effects of FRPC sheets on the circumferential stresses of damaged pipe
walls. The effects of three different FRPC sheets: Glass FRP (GFRP), Aramid FRP (AFRP),
and Carbon FRP (CFRP) on the performance of pipe walls will be compared analytically.
Results show that carbon fiber composites perform better than glass or aramid in improving the
ultimate internal pressure capacity of pipes, and therefore, significantly enhance the strength,
durability, and corrosive properties. 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Advanced composites; Corrosion; Durability; Fiber reinforced polymer composites
154
Nomenclature
sf
p
r
t
ss
Cd
g
Bd
E
km
kd
st
Ic
Ct
F
A
sm
d
k
T
n
tt
tivity, and high soil alkalinity. By utilizing conventional rehabilitation methods such
as shortcrete, polymer concrete composites, and the trenchless method, concrete pipelines and manhole rehabilitation in the US is estimated between $1 and 1.5 billion,
and natural gas pipeline rehabilitation is estimated at $530 million. With the ever
increasing uncertainty in the reliability of these existing repair methods, there is a
need for the development of a rapid and cost effective method of repairing pipelines
without excavation of overlaying soil and/or replacement of pipe sections. This need
has led to the potential use of advanced composite materials.
Advanced composites are lightweight, they have a high specific strength, they
provide a long corrosive resistance, and have a high level of durability. With an
increased tailorability and rapid installation, advanced composites do not require soil
excavation, removal of existing pipe, and are easy to carry into and applied onto
existing pipe surfaces. Pipe diameter is not excessively decreased and flow capacity
has been known to increase in some cases due to the smooth final coating that causes
less friction than some pipe material such as concrete [1].
155
Fig. 1.
Schematic of the repairing (a) and section of the wound pipe (b).
156
(1)
157
where it is assumed that tr and where sf=hoop stress due to internal fluid pressure;
p=internal fluid pressure; r=radius of pipe; and t=thickness of pipe wall.
The bending stress in the circumferential direction produced in the pipe wall by
the external soil loading can be estimated using Eq. (2) [5]
ss
6kmCdgB2dEtr
Et3+24kdpr3
(2)
where ss=bending stress due to soil load (MPa); Cd=calculation coefficient for earth
load; g=unit weight of soil backfill (N/mm3); Bd=width of ditch at the level of top
of pipe (m); E=modulus of elasticity of pipe (MPa); km=bending moment coefficient
dependent on the distribution of vertical load and reaction (MPa); and kd=a deflection
coefficient dependent on the distribution of vertical load and reaction.
When an external traffic load such as roadway, railway, or airplane traffic exist,
the resulting circumferential bending stresses produced in the pipe wall may be estimate from
st
1 6kmIcCtFEtr
A(Et3+24kdPr3)
(3)
where st=bending stress due to traffic load (MPa); Ic=impact factor; Ct=surface
impact load coefficient; F=wheel load on surface (N); and A=effective length of pipe
on which load is computed (m).
The maximum circumferential tensile stress sm at the critical sections can be
expressed by the following if the pipe wall remains in the elastic range under load
smsfssst
(4)
pr 6kmCdgB2dEtr 6kmIcCtFEtr
sm 3
t Et +24kdpr3 A(Et3+24kdPr3)
(5)
158
formed on the pipe surface being porous and their protective properties being poor.
The corrosion rates after this initial period gradually decreases and in some cases
stabilizes. Thus, with time the loss of wall thickness increases. Developing
expressions with a function of time in a general corrosive case, whether this means
weight loss, deepest pit or localized depth, or average pit or localized depth, can be
modeled empirically by a power law [6].
dkT n
(6)
(7)
The bending stress in the circumferential direction produced in the pipe wall by
the external soil loading is then expressed by
ss
6kmCdgB2dE(td)r
E(td)3+24kdpr3
(8)
Therefore, the circumferential bending stress produced in the pipe wall with an
external traffic load is expressed by
st
6kmIcCtFE(td)r
A(E(td)3+24kdpr3)
smsfssst
(9)
(10)
2.4. Wall stresses in underground pressurized frp reinforced damaged steel pipes
Applying the properties, equations, and theory behind the wall stresses in underground pressurized damaged pipes, expressions are developed to include the addition
of fiber reinforced polymer composites (FRP) for repair and rehabilitation of pipelines. Using FRP to repair and rehabilitate damaged pipe causes t (thickness of pipe)
to change. The following expression takes into consideration FRP addition and is
substituted for t as tt [7].
Fig. 2.
159
Circumferential stresses due to soil load, traffic load, and internal pressure in pipe without defects.
tt(tsd) 1
EFRPtFRP
Es(tsd)
(11)
Thus, with the consideration of FRP addition to the pipe wall thickness, the following expressions are developed for the circumferential stress due to internal pressure
and the bending stress in the circumferential direction produced in the pipe wall by
the external soil loading
pr
s f
EFRPtFRP
(tsd) 1+
Es(tsd)
ss
6kmCdgB2dEsttr
Et3t+24kdpr3
(12)
(13)
160
Fig. 3. Circumferential stresses due to soil load, traffic load, and internal pressure in damaged pipes.
The circumferential bending stress produced in the pipe wall with an external traffic
load with the addition to the FRP sheets
st
6kmIcCtFEttr
where tt(tsd)ntFRP
A(Et3t+24kdpr3)
smsfssst
(14)
(15)
161
Fig. 4. Circumferential stresses due to soil load, traffic load, and internal pressure in CFRP repaired
damaged pipes.
develop plotted curves stresses due to soil, traffic, and internal pressure. Table 2
shows the mechanical properties of FRP sheets.
The analytical results obtained from the model are shown in Figs. 25. Fig. 2
shows the comparison of circumferential stresses due to soil load, traffic load, and
internal pressure in an undamaged pipe, Fig. 3 shows the same comparisons but in
a damaged pipe. As expected, a pipe without defects withstand higher stresses due
to soil and traffic loads and lower stresses due to internal pressure than a pipe with
defects. For example, in the pipe without defect, the circumferential stress due to
internal pressure is 182.4 MPa with an internal pressure of 4 MPa, whereas in the
damaged pipe, the stresses are 304 and 4 MPa respectively. The circumferential
stress due to traffic in the pipe without defects at an internal pressure of 4 MPa is
112.6 MPa, whereas in the damaged pipe the stress is 77.7 MPa.
The question is what benefits do FRP composite sheets provide in a pipe circumferential stresses? and if they do provide benefit what type of FRP sheet (CFRP,
GFRP, or AFRP) has a greater ultimate internal pressure? Fig. 4 shows, as an
example, the circumferential stresses of the CFRP repaired damaged pipe due to the
162
Fig. 5. Comparison between circumferential stress and internal pressure in pipe without defect, pipe
with defect, and (GFRP, CFRP, and AFRP) repaired damaged pipe.
soil and traffic loads as well as to internal pressure. The curve shows a significant
increase in the stresses due to soil and traffic loads and a decrease in the stress due
to internal pressure when compared to Fig. 3.
Fig. 5 shows a comparison between the maximum circumferential stress, sm, (
sf+ss+st) and internal pressure in pipe without defect, pipe with defect, and GFRP,
CFRP, and AFRP repaired damaged pipe. The curve shows the benefits that FRP
sheets provide for the pipe strength with CFRP. Fig. 6 compares the undamaged
pipe, damaged pipe, and pipes repaired with the three different FRP sheets, to their
ultimate internal pressure (MPa). Again it is clear that the pipe repaired with carbon
fiber sheets has a higher stress threshold than those repaired with glass or aramid fibers.
163
Table 1
Mechanical properties and constraints of a given length of pipe
Symbol
Description
Value
r
t
Km
Cd
g
Bd
E
kd
Ic
Ct
F
d
A
228
5
0.235
1.32
18.85106
762
200,000
0.108
1.5
0.12
267,000
2
914
Table 2
Mechanical properties of FRP sheets
Specimens
Thickness, t (mm)
Modulus of elasticity
(GPa)
Glass
Aramid
Carbon
0.118
0.193
0.165
1500
2100
300
74
120
400
3. Conclusion
This paper concentrates on establishing fiber reinforced polymer composites as an
effective mean for the repair and rehabilitation of pipelines. This objective was
reached by developing a theoretical model with stress expressions and circumferential stress curves. The stress expressions were developed to study the interaction
between the different stresses exerted on pipe walls and the effects of FRP sheets
on the circumferential tensile stress of damaged pipe walls. The stress curves displayed the maximum circumferential tensile stresses due to soil loads, traffic loads
and the pipes internal pressure. These curves were analyzed and their results showed
that carbon fiber sheet provides a better performance than glass or aramid in improving the ultimate internal pressure capacity of pipes. This study was focused on the
application of fiber reinforced polymer on steel pipes. Steel may corrode in the presence of carbon fiber material. However, earlier studies have not shown any visible
degradation when polymeric material contacts steel. Thus, before applying FRP on
damaged steel pipe walls, the walls must be free of corrosion and well coated to
prevent the contact between FRP and the steel.
164
Fig. 6. Comparison between pipe status and ultimate internal pressure in pipe without defect, pipe with
defect, and (GFRP, CFRP, and AFRP) repaired damaged pipes.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National
Science Foundation CAREER Grant No. CMS-9796326.
References
[1] Fortner B. Main line mending. Civil Engng Mag 1999;July:425.
[2] Frassine R. Long-term performance of a polymer composite repair system for gas pipelines. In:
Advances in Polymer Technology, vol. 16, no. 1. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc, 1997:3343.
[3] Ahammed M, Melchers RE. Reliability of underground pipelines subject to corrosion. ASCE J Transport Engng 1994;120(6):9891002.
[4] Stephenson D. Pipeline design for water engineers. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1976.
[5] Spangler MG, Handy RL. Soil engineering, 4th ed. New York: Harper and Row, 1982.
[6] Kucera V, Mattsson E. Atmospheric corrosion. In: Mansfield F, editor. Proceedings: Corrosion Mechanics. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1987.
165
[7] Toutanji HA. Stressstrain characteristics of concrete columns externally confined with advanced fiber
composite sheets. ACI J Mat 1999;96(3):397404.