Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Madrid
Mayo y 2012
2.190.348,68
240.938,36
153.324,41
459.973,22
3.044.584,67
PROJECT SUMMARY
There are two main objetives in this project. Firstly, measure the future raw water
well to be installed in Boadilla del Monte, Community of Madrid. Secondly, the
pumping of waste water from the well to the deposit where the purification will happen.
The construction of the WWTP is due in 50 years, and will be placed in the
watershed of Valenoso stream. It is estimated a theoretical maximum flow of 2,000
m3/h pumped.
The installation of the pumping station will be composed by two segments. The
first segment will be divided in four sections. A section for every pump that the well
will have. Each section will have a vertical pipe of 2.5 m inside the well. Through an
elbow the pipes will arrive to the valve chamber. In this chamber will be necessary to
place a butterfly valve and a ball valve on each pipe. Afterward all of them will be
joined with a junction pipe. Here will start the second segment, where a 7 m pipe will be
required to join the junction pipe with another butterfly valve and from this one to the
clapper valve that will discharge in the tank.
Once the flow and the installation of the pump station is know, the height due to
the fluid frictions is calculated. The height obtained is 3.37 m.
Knowing the height due to the losses, and geodetic height of the well to the tank
(10 m), the conclusion is that the total height will be of 13.4 m. This is the total height
to which the pumps will have to lift the fluid to the tank.
A dry pump has been discard as another compartment in addition to the well is
needed. Therefore, to save space, it is decided to choose a submerged pump for waste
water. A study has been made to analyze the more suitable pumps for a lifetime of 10
years. For the analysis has been taken in consideration: the hydraulic performance, the
NPSH, the power on the shaft of the pump and the energy and service costs for ten
years.
In conclusion, it has been chosen to install a 3+1 system. The four pumps will be
the same, the brand selected is ABS, AFP model 3002, with an engine ME 900-6. The
reason to choose a system 3+1 is due to a reserve pump has been forecasted as the cost
of loss due to lack of activity is high. The reason for the pumps to be the same is due to
simplified maintenance and reduced stock of spare parts.
To avoid thermal overload of the motors, the pumps must not be too often started.
The engine power is of 90 kW, it corresponds to a maximum of 15 starts / hour, it
means a maximum of 240 s between two consecutive starts.
For operation with submersible pumps should be considered that the minimum
heigh of the well has to be 1.77 m in order to the engine to get cool.
The volume of the well also depend on the sequence of operation. The operational
mode selected is staggered start and stop, this means that the pumps will start one
after the other in ascending order and stop one after the other in descending order. The
method defers from the staggered start and stop common. This method will start the
pumps in ascending order one after the other but will stop all of them simultaneously.
The method chosen will increase the volume of water and adjust better to the flow
fluctuations so the WWTP will be more benefit.
Circular wells are generally used in low flow stations or prefabricated. However,
rectangular or square wells allow a more abundant flow of water and regular. With a
hydraulic criterion are preferable to square or rectangular, so it has been chosen in this
project.
Due to the exposed data the dimensions of the well will be 4800x4000x3000 mm
(W x L x H). The useful volume will be 18.38 m and the total volume will be 57.60 m.
To avoid direct intake of water on pumps or in its power cables, it has been
decided to build a wall into the pit reassuring to decrease the kinetic energy of water and
as well to help remove dissolved air. In the bottom part of the wall there are several
holes so the water can flow to the pumps.
From the economic point of view during the ten years analyzed, the losses will be
16,795,101.65. This is derived by subtracting the income from energy sales and
2.190.348,68
240.938,36
153.324,41
459.973,22
3.044.584,67
NDICE DE FIGURAS
ndice de figuras
Figura 1. Mapa de Madrid-Boadilla del Monte ........................................... 13
Figura 2. Mapa de ubicacin del EDAR en Boadilla del Monte................. 13
Figura 3. Plano de pozo con planta rectangular .......................................... 19
Figura 4. Tipos de impulsores ........................................................................ 19
Figura 5. Procesador de datos ....................................................................... 24
Figura 6. Bombas para aguas limpias y residuales ...................................... 30
Figura 7. Altura de elevacin ......................................................................... 31
Figura 8. Instalacin fija sumergida ............................................................. 32
Figura 9. Instalacin horizontal en seco ...................................................... 32
Figura 10. Instalacin vertical en seco .......................................................... 32
Figura 11. Porttiles ....................................................................................... 33
Figura 12. Formas de instalacin fija sumergida......................................... 34
Figura 13. Vrtices debido a una sumergencia insuficiente........................ 35
Figura 14. Descripcin de la cavitacin ........................................................ 36
Figura 15. Ejemplo de la erosin por cavitacin.......................................... 36
Figura 16. Consecuencias de la cavitacin.................................................... 37
Figura 17. Distribucin de presiones en una bomba ................................... 38
Figura 18. Proceso de identificacin y evaluacin de aspectos ambientales..
Significativos (Fuente: Ministerios de Medio Ambiente) ......... 39
Figura 19. Rugosidad ...................................................................................... 49
Figura 20. Prdidas de carga primaria en el primer tramo........................ 52
I