Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
From:
Submitted by:
Subject:
RECOMMENDATION
Accept the Concept Design Study (DS 16-172) subject to the attached Findings and Draft
Recommendations/Conditions.
Application:
Block:
Location:
Applicant:
DS 16-172
APN:
010-281-003
AA
Lot:
5
th
Casanova Street, 3 SW of 12 Avenue
Claudio Ortiz
Property Owner: Michael and Phyllis Entis
145
DS 16-172 (Entis)
June 8, 2016
Staff Report
Page 2
Staff has scheduled this application for conceptual review. The primary purpose of this meeting is
to review and consider the site planning, privacy and views, and mass and scale related to the
project. However, the Commission may provide input on other aspects of the design.
PROJECT DATA FOR A 5,000 SQUARE FOOT SITE:
Site Considerations
Allowed
Existing
Proposed
Floor Area
1,800 sf (43%)
NA
1,800 sf (45%)
Site Coverage
Trees
556 sf 1
3 Upper /1 Lower
(recommended)
NA
1 lower (10 oak); one
6 toyon; one 5
ornamental plum
556 sf
One oak and removal of the
toyon and plum
18/24
NA
12/18
NA
Setbacks
Minimum Required
Existing
Proposed
Front
15
NA
19-4 to residence
5-0 to garage
10 (25%)
NA
NA
Rear
15
NA
Min: 3
STAFF ANALYSIS
Forest Character: Residential Design Guidelines 1.1 through 1.4 encourage maintaining a forested
image on the site and for new construction to be at least six feet from significant trees.
The City Forester and Planning staff reviewed the property in April 2016 as part of the Citys Site
Assessment protocols and identified three trees on the property, of which only the oak tree is
considered significant. The trees are in the front yard and include one lower canopy tree (10 oak),
one 6 Toyon and one 5 ornamental plum that are all grouped together on the south boundary
line. There is one 36-inch Monterey pine in the Citys right-of-way, which will be protected during
construction. The City Forester has indicated that an upper canopy tree should be planted in the
back yard. The project plans also show a new oak tree will be planted in the front yard. Staff has
Accounts for site coverage bonus if at least 50% of all site coverage is of permeable or semi-permeable materials.
146
DS 16-172 (Entis)
June 8, 2016
Staff Report
Page 3
drafted a condition requiring that one new upper canopy tree be planted in the back yard. In
addition, the plum and Toyon trees are proposed to be removed.
Privacy & Views: Residential Design Guidelines 5.1 through 5.3 state that designs should preserve
reasonable solar access to neighboring parcels and maintain privacy of indoor and outdoor spaces
in a neighborhood and maintain view opportunities.
With the proposed residence being one-story, and adjacent residences also being one-story,
privacy issues with the neighbors does not appear to be an issue. Proposed window size and
placement are shown in the project plans. All proposed windows and doors are wood clad with
many with multiple panes. There is one patio to be located on the south side of the residence and
one deck in the back yard (west side) off a bedroom.
The proposed project was also evaluated relative to solar access. The proposed design does not
change the vertical or horizontal profile of the residence such that there would be a change in solar
access to the neighboring properties to the north or south.
Through the placement, location and size of windows, patios, doors and decks, the design respects
the rights to reasonable privacy on adjoining sites. In staffs opinion, the proposed residence meets
the objectives of Residential Design Guidelines 5.1 through 5.3.
Mass & Bulk: Residential Design Guidelines 7.1 through 7.6 encourages a buildings mass to relate
to the context of other homes nearby and to minimize the mass of a building as seen from the
public way or adjacent properties. Further, these guidelines state that a building should relate to
a human scale in its basic forms.
The proposed new residence and detached garage are each one-story and are setback
appropriately per code and the design provides varied massing, relief and scale that creates
proportion appropriate for the site and neighborhood. The result is a simple character with
discreet rectangular building masses. In staffs opinion, the proposed residence meets the
objectives of Residential Design Guidelines 7.1 through 7.6.
Building & Roof Form: Residential Design Guidelines 8.1 through 8.3 state that "Shallow to
moderately pitched roofs are appropriate on one-story buildings. More steeply pitched roofs with
low plate lines can be used on two-story buildings." The Guidelines emphasize using
restraint and simplicity in building forms, which should not be complicated, and roof lines,
147
DS 16-172 (Entis)
June 8, 2016
Staff Report
Page 4
which should avoid complex forms. Walls should be kept simple in the extent of variation in
planes.
The project includes a mix of gable and shed roofs appropriately slopped (8:12 on gable roof
elements and 4:12 on the two shed roof elements) and located to avoid complexity but create an
interesting but simple design. Windows and doors are wood and gutters are round copper. Two
skylights are proposed on the south aspect of the master bathroom. In staffs opinion, the
proposed residence meets the objectives of Residential Design Guidelines 8.1 through 8.3.
Site Coverage/Landscaping: Per Municipal Code Section 17.10.030.C, site coverage shall be limited
to a maximum of 22 percent of the base floor area allowed for the site. In addition, if at least 50
percent of all site coverage on the property is made of permeable or semi-permeable materials, an
additional amount of site coverage of up to four percent of the site area may be allowed. For this
4,000 square foot lot the total amount of coverage is allowed to be 556 square feet; the project
plans are consistent with the allowed coverage. The plans show 556 square feet of site coverage.
The applicant will remove existing vegetation and replace it with new landscaping as shown in
Sheet L-1 of the Project Plans. In staffs opinion, the proposed site coverage is consistent with the
Municipal Code.
Exterior Lighting: With regard to light fixtures, Municipal Code Section 15.36.070.B.1 states that all
exterior lighting attached to the main building or any accessory building shall be no higher than 10
feet above the ground and shall not exceed 25 watts (incandescent equivalent; i.e., approximately
375 lumens) in power per fixture, and that landscape lighting shall not exceed 18 inches above the
ground nor more than 15 watts (incandescent equivalent; i.e., approximately 225 lumens) per
fixture.
In addition, the Citys Residential Design Guidelines, Section 11.8, states an objective to: Preserve
the low nighttime lighting character of the residential neighborhoods. Use lights only where needed
for safety and at outdoor activity areas. Appropriate locations may include building entries, gates,
terraces, walkways, and patios, and [] Point lights downward to reduce glare and avoid light
pollution, Locate and shield fixtures to avoid glare and excess lighting as seen from the
neighboring properties and from the street.
The applicant is proposing copper finished, lantern-style wall-mounted light fixtures. Style and
location of this lighting are depicted on Sheet 8 of the Project Plans. These fixtures have a copper
shroud around the light bulb to prevent glare and light pollution. A different light fixture will be
148
DS 16-172 (Entis)
June 8, 2016
Staff Report
Page 5
hanging at the front door portico as shown on Sheet 8 (Fixture B) of the Project Plans. The location
of all fixtures are shown in Sheet Nos. 3, 5 and 6. Staff supports the proposed light fixtures and
notes that they comply with the City requirements with regard to location and wattage. Landscape
lighting is proposed as shown on Sheet L-1; six landscape fixtures are proposed.
Public ROW: The portion of the City Right-of-Way (ROW) between the front property line and edge
of paving is in a natural state and contains no encroachments.
Alternatives: Staff has included draft findings that the Commission can adopt if the Commission
accepts the overall design concept, including the architectural style of the building. However, if the
Commission does not support the design, then the Commission could continue the application with
specific direction given to the applicant and/or staff.
Environmental Review: The proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA requirements,
pursuant to Section 15303 (Class 3) New Construction or Conversion of Small Units. The project
includes the construction of one single-family residence in a residential zone, and therefore
qualifies for a Class 3 exemption. The proposed residence does not present any unusual
circumstances that would result in a potentially significant environmental impact.
ATTACHMENTS:
149
150
FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR CONCEPT DESIGN STUDY ACCEPTANCE (CMC 17.64.80 and LUP Policy
P1-45)
For each of the required design study findings listed below, staff has indicated whether the
submitted plans support adoption of the findings. For all findings checked "no" the staff report
discusses the issues to facilitate the Planning Commission decision-making. Findings checked
"yes" may or may not be discussed in the report depending on the issues.
Municipal Code Finding
YES
1. The project conforms with all zoning standards applicable to the site, or has
received appropriate use permits and/or variances consistent with the zoning
ordinance.
NO
2. The project is consistent with the Citys design objectives for protection and
enhancement of the urbanized forest, open space resources and site design. The
projects use of open space, topography, access, trees and vegetation will maintain
or establish a continuity of design both on the site and in the public right of way that
is characteristic of the neighborhood.
3. The project avoids complexity using simple/modest building forms, a simple roof
plan with a limited number of roof planes and a restrained employment of offsets
and appendages that are consistent with neighborhood character, yet will not be
viewed as repetitive or monotonous within the neighborhood context.
4. The project is adapted to human scale in the height of its roof, plate lines, eave
lines, building forms, and in the size of windows doors and entryways. The
development is similar in size, scale, and form to buildings on the immediate block
and neighborhood. Its height is compatible with its site and surrounding
development and will not present excess mass or bulk to the public or to adjoining
properties. Mass of the building relates to the context of other homes in the
vicinity.
5. The project is consistent with the Citys objectives for public and private views
and will retain a reasonable amount of solar access for neighboring sites. Through
the placement, location and size of windows, doors and balconies the design
respects the rights to reasonable privacy on adjoining sites.
6. The design concept is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies related to
residential design in the general plan.
7. The development does not require removal of any significant trees unless
necessary to provide a viable economic use of the property or protect public health
and safety. All buildings are setback a minimum of 6 feet from significant trees.
8. The proposed architectural style and detailing are simple and restrained in
character, consistent and well integrated throughout the building and
complementary to the neighborhood without appearing monotonous or repetitive
in context with designs on nearby sites.
TBD
151
DS 16-172 (Entis)
June 8, 2016
Concept Findings
Page 2
9. The proposed exterior materials and their application rely on natural materials
and the overall design will add to the variety and diversity along the streetscape.
10. Design elements such as stonework, skylights, windows, doors, chimneys and
garages are consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines and will complement the
character of the structure and the neighborhood.
11. Proposed landscaping, paving treatments, fences and walls are carefully
designed to complement the urbanized forest, the approved site design, adjacent
sites, and the public right of way. The design will reinforce a sense of visual
continuity along the street.
12. Any deviations from the Design Guidelines are considered minor and reasonably
relate to good design principles and specific site conditions.
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS (CMC 17.64.010.B.1):
1. Local Coastal Program Consistency: The project conforms with the certified Local
Coastal Program of the City of Carmel-by-the Sea.
2. Public access policy consistency: The project is not located between the first
public road and the sea, and therefore, no review is required for potential public
access.
152
Recommendations/Draft Conditions
No.
1.
2.
The applicant shall submit a landscape plan for final Planning Commission review
that includes a proposal for one new upper-canopy trees on the site.
A Monterey pine will be planted in the back yard.
153
En tis Residence
New Single Family Residence
Carmel. California
A.P.N. 010-261-003-000
BLOCK: AA
LOTS: 03
ci)
LLJ
~
SHEET INDEX
PROJECT DATA
LOT SIZE
ZONING
A.P.N.
4,ooo.o so.n.
R-1
010-281-003
ADDRESS
BLOCK: M
1. COVER NOTES
LOlS: 03
FlOOR AREA
F'AR AU.O\\ED
1,800.0 S.F.
46.0S
PROPOSED
MAIN DWELUNG
DETACHED GARAGE
1,600.0 S.F.
200.0 S.F.
2.
.3.
4.
5.
6.
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
F1.00R PLAN
ELEVAllONS MAIN DWEWNG
ELEVAllONS MAIN DWEWNG, GARAGE
ELEVATIONS &: ROOF PLAN
7. WINDOW &c DOOR SCHEDULES
8. PROPOSED MATERIALS
SCOPE OF WORK
1. DEMOUTION OF A 652 SQ.FT. SINGLE FAMILY DWEWNG AND A
MAY 2 8 2016
City of Carmat-by-rne ..seo
9. VOLUME ANALYSIS
TOTAl. (E) GROSS FlOOR AREA:
1,800.0 S.F.
45.01C
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
SITE CO\IRAGE
LAND COVERAGE AlLOWED
S~US
SllE COVERAGE
398.0 SO.FT.
22.'"' of F.A.R.
160.0 SQ.FT.
"'"'of SllE
556.0 SQ.F'T.
13.9 ll:
PERVIOUS COVERAGE
ENTRY WAli<WAY
WAU<WAY
DRIVEWAY
SOUlH PAllO
DECK
TOTAL PER\IIOUS COVERAGE
75.0
40.6
43.3
298. J
54.8
SQ.FT.
SQ.FT.
SO.FT.
SO. FT.
SQ.FT.
II!IPER\IIOUS COVERAGE
PORCH
SOUlH STEPS
TOTAL IMPER\IIOUS COVERAGE
TOTAL GROSS COVERAGE
s12.0 so.n.
30.0 SQ.FT.
14.0 SQ.FT.
44.0 SQ.FT.
5:56.0 SQ.FT.
z<(
_j
a..
~
0
0
_j
LL.
SCALE: 1' - 1/4"
154
155
rl.l
~"i
rl.l
....
~
~....
rl.l
rLl
i!;
i~
-:za
.eg~
..,-m
i~~
in"'
......
,!C
,..
D~
ttt~iI
'-!~
8~
.!.!.ii
~liS
;:::-1
p~
()
Casanova Street
EDGE Of PAVEMEHT
~
~
DATE:
SCALE:
REVISION:
KRW
MS
ALTA SURVEYS
831-632-0956
$ B a s e l i n e Consulting
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS
1/s=t
BOUNDARY SURVEYS
02-23-2016
C'l
6
z
m
c:
APPR<>VEDsv,
DRAWNBY:
___________ j
:>::
~"''l'~'2~'"'>>f'"'i
-- .. .
. .:
lktcv::'."'-""""'"""".\"*'>-~
/ / _ , /--
....ocW'
,/rot~
-----
It
//
15.5'
~~
~:
~~
/ __ /,/~~
&/ ..
~-'-'
r~
+~~~,,~------- II
~4!r
"'
;
~
---------------------------------~:::~-~-~~
~;g
gO
()
...
I.
-1
li
~'(>
SITE PLAN
"'
"'c:
i~::1:
0~
APN 010-281-003
2 SW 12th. Avenue/ Casanova Street, Carmel, Ca
prepared for:
Michael & Phyllis Entis
;I
:i
s;
i5
ili
l!J
::1:
ill
... '\
Iii <:I
~
"'
PORCH
30.0 SQ.FT., CAR1.4EL STONE SET ON CONC.
SEE SHEET 8, PAllO
DECK
5-4.8 SQ.FT., WOOD FLOOR
SEE DET: - / -
If"'"'"""
ENlRY WALKWAY
--~~~o~o-------
CONCREllE WALL
---..
-----
9'-8"
,---
r
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
MAIN DWELLING
\
NEIGHBOR BUILDING
'
'
I
I
I
I
I
\\
HB
ON SAND.
SEE SHEET 8, W/>J..KWA Y
NEIGHBOR BUILDING
1-
\\
:L
>
0 'w'M
<[
Cl..
l..J....
I
I
'
I
I
l.:J
GAR' GE
:.Q\
\\
\\
L---- __!-_-_-l_-_-_:-_-.
(ASSUMED)
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
/
~ /
NEIGHBOR BUILDING
SOUTH STEPS
SOUlH PAllO
FIRE PIT
GAS ONLY, STONE SURROUND
2D-INOI HIGH
SEE SHEET 8, ARE PIT
DRIVEWAY
298.J SQ.FT.
CARM.EL STONE se:T ON SAND.
SEE SHEET 8, PAllO
TRASH AREA
z<(
SllE COVERAGE
LEGEND
PERVIOUS OO'YERAGE
A.aw
8~W
~
ElCISliNG TREES 10
BE REIIIO~
ENlRY WAU<WAY
WAU<WAY
DRIVEWAY
SOUni PAllO
DECK
TOTAL PERVIOUS CO\RAGE
512.0 SQ.FT.
PORCH
SOUni SllEPS
30.0 SQ.FT.
14.0 SQ.FT.
44.0 SQ.FT.
556.0 SQ.FT.
a..
54.8 SQ.FT.
IMPERVIOUS COVIERAGE
_J
N
75.0 SQ.FT.
40.6 SQ.FT.
43.3 SQ.Fi.
298.3 SQ.FT.
0
0
10
15
~u~u~-~~~~~~~~----~1
( IN FEET ) 1/4 Inch = 1 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
_J
lL.
SCALE: 1' - 1/4"
156
Au~;loil
W
FIM.F\Jl101l.4'
Ui
z
~
0::
r- - -----1
~(( ~~DO]
L-- - -----
ROOM NOTES
KEY NOTES
OJ PULL-ouT PNilRY, RIU. HEIGHT
'loWO
[Qg~..,~g.
n-o-
IIQI ~?xY3'-11"
IIQIJf?-?x 10'-c
l@)~~{j.GX~11"
[j]]~"x~
~r.l!fii~~2'-0'
IIIIJ~~~T
l1illJ ~~ ,~:c
!ill! r~tt~QOM
ffm21~x~~~
[QI~;r'!f-rt'
ITIJ~atm
III3l ~~ 18'-4"
[g SHOWER FR PLAH
[j] BUlLT-tl lHJol CAB.
IIQ1I ~X w;,.
~~~~~o'!()()lj
0
G
CZJ~-IWI:fl~r:"at~~
FIIIICE-IIAKR.
WASIll SPACE
[ID~'IV~~,!I&
ll1l !nU':
7-INCH
liB WASHER
[SjllRYER
[[]~'Ia'
fZll c:ABIIET:
rn~~ CMIINE'lll
i2] NI~E:
(ID~~sy-~
llJ FRPIACE:
X" 1SOICERN
I'US1ER !II.ILT-fj
sa 'MNCOW SCIIEDUL
sa DOOR !!ICHEilUl
u u u
<(
0...
.....J
lY
10
15
0
0
.....J
lL
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: ,. - 1/4"
157
________ L _______________________________ _
KEY NOTES
OJ ROOF:
(2] SIDING:
CEI.tENT PLASTER
STAINED
[l] :g~
~x:p~g~J~T
OVER
A 8X12
1-D
F.F at 99.8'-
IJ3j AVERAGE
,..
1!.
RIDGE at 112.4'-
SOUTH ELEVATION
RIDGE at 114.7'-
WOOD CAP
-RIDGE at 114.7'
-- - ----!;l:t;l~!;t;r;'1hF!tm"i';r;;mMlhl"i';r;;mMlhl"'i'i!f!mi'i'ti1'5!l!r!!~("
ci:i
>
LiJ
0::
F.F at 100.4' -
11
--- - - - --
EAST ELEVATlON
WITHOUT GARAGE
WITH GARAGE
-----1--[':______L________________ -.::f::'==l"''"'~---------~
" ----------------------- ---------------------
,-RIDGE at 114.8'
j /r -"''"" "'"
~~,-~~~-~,--~, ~ ~::::
~GEd ~-~ -----~~ E~a~t~ ~ L~7'~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "I!I IUI I ~I"I "I I I I 1!l l "ui ~I !UII~II~~~~~~~~~~~~,
"'
PLATE at 107.8'-
-- -----
mB
"'
lD=I
ffi[
-- -
-PLATE at 107.8'
~CJII
(/)
I-
NORTH ELEVATION
<(
>
w
0
u u u
10
15
GRAPHIC SCALE
_J
~1'11"'
158
iJI
!II
IIIII
II
Ill
II
II
II
KEY NOTES
at 111.8'
-RIDGE
II
OJ ROOF:
ill
IJI
Ill
II
Ill
-PLATE
rn -
at 107.8'
rn:~ -
f--
rn -
r -PLATE at 100.8'
- --- --r-5~
1]] GRADE:
at 100.1'
SOUlH ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
1\tlERE OCCURS
[QI ~~~~tlr~r:S:SitAJ~,i!g~T,
EAST ELEVATION
- ----- - -- -
F.F
WOOD CAP
ot 99.8'
cii
>
w
~
WEST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
KEY NOTES
r------------1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--------------------------------------~-
[Jj DOWNSPOUTS
(2] GUTlERS W/ 2X
[!j SK'IUGiiT:
8:12
RIDGE 0 114.1
8:12
l4x3e
[[j BUI.DING
SHED 4:12
SLOPE
~CHIMNEY
LEGEND
SLOPE CIRECliON
ARROW
ROOF UNE: EXJSl1NG
lHJa< SOLID UNE
RIDGE 0 1121
iI
II
~-------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4:12
....
,-
- i i...... -
--eN
.,.:::::
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"~iii:
r---------- -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------------------------
_________...::
I
I
ROOF PLAN
uuw
$
10
I
GRAPHIC SCALE
15
I
5CAJ..E: ,. -
v-.
159
Window Schedule
(!J
4'-0"
4' 0"
4'-0"
2'-0"~
ill
B
"'
1
2
~
z
z
<(
- - -- - --- - - -- - ~ ~ -- ~
Fl-
LOCATION
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
t7
18
19
20
21
6' 3"
3'-0"
3'-o
4'-0"
4' -o
4'-0"
4'-0"
B
B
D
E
F
G
H
i
J
J
2-e
1'-8"
1'-8"
2'-8"
2'-6"
3'-o"
s-o
s-o
K
L
M
2'-6"
5'-0"
2'-8"
2'-8"
2' 4"
3'-4"
N
0
0
p
Q
Window Notes:
e-o
s-o
2'-:G"
5'-0"
~ II I I I llll J
IJ IDJ
..- ..- ....--
,..:r
:r
I"
'--
'--
~.,__
1-!-
1-1-
!::::==
Dl D -
'I'
3' 4"
I I I I I "'~
'ln
rn
tB ,
;!,
I
,..=~
3'-2"
2'-6"
4'-11"
4'-11"
3'-8"
7'-s
1'-1o
7'-s
6'-8"
1'-4"
1'-4"
3'-2"
3'-2"
- -- -- ~
..
a Dl
A
lli.AZtiO N01E:
ill]] [[ill
~ 111H 'IHE
NANUFACJURE 11 _ , - Cll' Tl!ER
STNilARD DOOR PAND. llfHT AND
WATCH 1HE GlASS BOJTOii LINE
1111H Tl AllJACEKT weows.
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
rn
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
#
HE:AD
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Note:
'MNDO~
AS SPECIFY BY CUENT.
10
HA~
SCREENS.
OF
Symbols
'MNDOW
REFERENCE
Abbreviations
0 _
u;
z
'MNDOW
NUMBER
>
w
~
Door Schedule
1IDJ 0@ 1
Glazing Legend
.....
LOCATION
'b
1
2
3
z'-'
_J
_J
<
::E
~
0
4
5
6
7
8
ENTRY
BEDROOM TWO
MECHANICAL ROOM
MASTER BEDROOM
UVING ROOM
DINING ROOM
DINING ROOIA
GARAGE
GARAGE
J' o x s a
B
B
A
D
D
E
m
z
SIZE~
MATE IAL
B'- 0"
'lo
NO.
p
p
5' 0'
p
p
'I'ES
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
'I'ES
YES
YES
YES
'I'ES
NO
YES
YES
YES
'I'ES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
IIANUFACTURE:
AllORESS:
Cl'rt', STAlE. ZIP:
PHONE::
F'AX:
. .::..,_
s-s
DETAILS
THRESHOLD JAMB
0::
a ~
REMARKS
CASEMENT LOWER/FlXED TOP
CASEMENT
CASEMENT
SUDER
CASEMENT
CASEMENT
FIXED
CASEMENT
CASEMENT
F1XED
CASEMENT
CASEMENT
CASEMENT
CASEMENT BOTTOM/ F1XEO TOP
FIXED
CASEMENT BOITOM/ FlXED TOP
CASEMENT
F1XEO
FIXED
CASEMENT
CASEMENT
DETAIL SHEET
iS
.....
Hardware Manufacture:
,.,
p
p
WOOD UNCLAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOD UNCLAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOO-UNCLAO
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOD UNCLAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOO-UNCI..AD
WOOD UNCLAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOD-UNClAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOD UNCLAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOD UNCLAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WOOD-UNCLAD
WANUF' ACTURE:
ADDRESS:
Cl'rt', STAlE. ZIP:
PHONE;
fAX:
t...
'lo
r::i:
4'-0"
3'-8"
3'-e
1'-2"
4' -o
2'-0"
6'-8"
Window Manufacture:
'b
rn
a.
X
X
x
X
x
X
X
x
)(
X
X
X
x
x
x
x
X
X
)(
X
X
:I:
SIZE~
MATE IAL
IU
KITCHEN
UVING ROOM
UVINC ROOM
BA"THROOM
BEDROOM ONE
BEDROOM "TWO
HALLWAY
MASTER BATHROOM
MASTER BATHROOM
l.tASTER BEDROOIA
MASTER BEDROOM
MASTER BEDROOM
HALLWAY
UVING ROOM
UVING ROOM
UVING ROOM
DINING ROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
GARAGE
GARAGE
3
4
~
0
-- - -- - -
_J
_J
'b
I
.....
'-'
z
NO.
WOOD
p
p
wooo p
wooo p
WOOD
WOOD
wooo
p
p
p
p
WOOD
WOOD
REMARKS
li:
WOOD
OUTSIDE
OUTSlDE
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
0
IU
15
~
::::E
DETAIL SHEET
DETAILS
THRESHOLD JAMB
#
HEAD
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
z
<(
~
I I I
I I
Door Notes:
I. PRO\IIDE DEAD 1101..T LOCKS ON -'lL EXTERIOR I>CORS. SEE
SCHEDULE FOR AODillONAL REQUIREMENTS.
2. PR0\1\DE PRIVACY HARDWARE 1'011 ALL BEDROOM AND
IIA'IHROOII LOCAliCNS.
~ GOIERAL CONlRACTUR 10 CCNSIILT 1111H OWNER Fa~
ADDITIONAL ODOR HARDWARE REWIRBIENTS.
4. AU. DOOR GLA21NG 10 BE ~ GLASS.
5. All. EXTERIOR OCOR GI.A2ING 10 BE 5/a" INSUL.AlED
m.4PEREO GLASS.
Window Manufacture:
IWIUFACTURE:
ADCRESS:
CITY, STA1E, ZIP:
PHONE:
IIANUFACTURE:
AODRESS:
CITY, S'TA'IE. ZIP:
PHONE:
FAX:
Note:
6. DOORS llT'M'IN CONOiliONED AND UNCONDillONED
SPACES 10 BE F'IAl.Y IlEA'JHER STRIPPED.
7. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO RE'IIEW OOOii ORDER 'MTH
ARCHITECT PAIOR 10 DOOR ORDER PLACEI.IENT.
8. DOOR HINGES 10 BE 4~"H.X4.ll"w. DOOR 1-o
8. ALL OOCR TOPS AND BOTTCII 10 BE SANDED, F1NISID.
AND SEAI..ED.
10. GARAGE DOORS :
SEE SCHEDULE AND OCTtRIOR ElVAnONS FOR
ADDillONAL INFORMAllCN.
Symbols
REFERENCE
0 - DOOR
NUMBER
Glazing Legend
TYPE 1 - TEMPERED GLAZING
PER
c.a.c.
Abbreviations
FAJC:
Hardware Manufacture:
I I
2406.+
a:::
0
0
Z(f)
<(W
_J
3:=>
oo
oW
zi
-U
~(f)
160
PHiliPS
PHILLIPS
WATTS:
LUMENS:
BULB TYPE:
4 WATTS
150
811 LED SOCKET
STONE VENEER
MATERIAL:
FINISH:
CARMEL STONE
NATURAL
MANUFAClURE:
T24 COMPUANT:
COLOR:
WATTS:
LUMENS:
BULB TYPE:
DIMENSIONS:
BEVOLO
YES
COPPER
4 WATTS
150
SEE BULB BELOW
14"H X 10.5"W X 7.5
FENCE 8
MATERIAL=
FINISH:
HEIGHT:
FIXTURE
FIXTURE 8
FIXTURE A
BULB
MANUFACTURE:
REDWOOD
NAl\JRAL
4 FT. MAX.
MANUFACTURE:
T24 COMPUANT:
COLOR:
WATTS:
LUMENS:
BULB TYPE:
DIMENSIONS:
MANUFACTURE:
T24 COMPUANT:
BEVOLO
'I'ES
COPPER
4 WATTS
150
SEE BULB BEl.OW
14"H X 10.5"W X 9.5"
COLOR:
WATTS:
LUMENS:
BULB TYPE:
DIMENSIONS:
c
UN KNOW
N/A
BL.ACI<
3 WATIS
200
LED MODULE
18"H X 7"W
FENCE A
MAlERIAL:
FINISH:
HEIGHT:
REDWOOD
NAl\JRAL
4 FT. OR 6 FT. AS NOTED ON SITE PLAN
(j)
_J
<(
DRIVEWAY PAVERS
FIRE PIT
MANUFACTURE:
COLOR:
CARMEL STONE
NATURAl.
MANUFAClURE:
COLOR:
INSTALLAllON:
CALSTONE
OAK BARREl. GRAY
SET ON SAND
WALKWAY
PATIO
MANUFACTURE:
COLOR:
INSTALL.A110N:
CARMEL STONE
NAl\JRAL
SET ON SAND
MANUFACl\JRE:
COLOR:
INSTALL.AllON:
CARMEL STONE
NATURAL
SET ON SAND
1<(
::;E
SCAI.E: 1'- 1/4"
161
MAIN DWELLING
SHOWN SOUD THK LINE
F'F ELEV=100.4'
(ASSU~ED)
cii
>
w
0::
GARAGE
SHOWN SOLID THK UNE
F'F ELEV=100.1'
(ASSU~ED)
LIGHT KEY
... PATH LIGHT, 3 WATIS LED, SEE FIXTURE "3" ON SHEET 13
MAY NOT BE SPACED CLOSER THAN 10-FEET APART
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
ELEC1RtC CON1ROUR
~~~IN~z~:p E~E~:=vnlli ~~
PLANT INDEX
<(
No.
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SIZE
1 GAL
5 GAL
a_
5 GAL
<(
_J
a_
VAL'~!:
ROCK ROSE
LAVANDULA STOECHAS
SPANISH LAVENDER
SALVIA L.EUCANlHA
5 GAL
ROSMARINUS
ROSMARY
5 GAL
RHAMNUS CAUFORNICA
COFFEEBARRY
5 GAL
CAREX PANSA
CA MEADOW SEDGE
PACKS
uuw
(,/)
0
10
15
<(
_J
1 ft.
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: ,. - 1/~"
Ll
162