Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region 02
Schools Division of Quirino
QUIRINON GENERAL HIGH SCHOOL
Cabarroguis

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) FOR SCHOOL HEADS
Name of Employee:
Position:
School:
Rating Period:

MFOs

Key Result
Areas (KRAs)

Student
Outcome
(25%)
Sub-Total
Score
Learning
Environment
(15%)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
TIMEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS
OBJECTIVES
per
LINE
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA
Attain 75% MPS in
NAT

January
to March
2016

10%

Evaluate
Outcomes

Learning

January
to March
2016

10%

Assist
in reporting
learning outcomes and
achievement
to
parents and other
stakeholders

January
to March
2016

5%

Provides assistance
in enforcing school
safety
procedures
and policies

January
to March
2016

5%

Observes
teachers
and
learners
in
implementing different

January
to March
2016

5%

5-Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area

4-84%-99% Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
3-Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area.
2-Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
1-Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
5 -students attained an average of 85% and above GPA
4-students attained an average of 81 - 84% GPA
3-students attained an average of 78 -80 % GPA
2 - students attained an average of 75-77% GPA
1 - students attained an average of 74% GPA
5 -100% assisted in reporting learning outcomes and achievements
4-84%-99% assisted in reporting learning outcomes and achievements
3-68%-83% assisted in reporting learning outcomes and achievements
es
2-52%-67 assisted in reporting learning outcomes and achievements
1- assisted in reporting learning outcomes and achievements

5 -100% assist in the conduct of school safety procedure (DRRM)

4-84%-99% assist in the conduct of school safety procedure (DRRM)
3-68%-83% assist in the conduct of school safety procedure (DRRM)
2-52%-67 assist in the conduct of school safety procedure (DRRM)
1- assist in the conduct of school safety procedure (DRRM)
5 -observed 100% of the teachers in the department
4-1%-3% observed 89 - 99% of the teachers in the department
3-observed 76 - 88 % of the teachers in the department

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

SCORE*
RATING
ACTUAL
Q E T Ave.
RESULTS

2 - observed 63 - 75% of the teachers in the department

1 - observed 50 - 62% of the teachers in the department

learning activities for

higher learning

Maximizes the use

of
instructional
materials

January
to March
2016

5%

Monitor the teaching

learning process

January
to March
2016

10%

Submit
monthly
supervisory
plan/
accomplishment report

January
to March
2016

10%

Evaluate and report

learning outcomes

January
to March
2016

10%

Check class records,

gradesheets, TQ's,
and other forms (SF1,
SF2, SF5)

January
to March
2016

10%

Establish and ensure

support and
cooperation of
stakeholders

January
to March
2016

5%

Informs
parents
of
learners progress, school
policies and procedures

January
to March
2016

5%

Motivate and support

teachers to attain peak
performance through
awards, recognition,
incentives and others

January
to March
2016

5%

5 - monitored the use of SIM's per teacher/subject area

4- monitored the use of SIM's per teacher/subject area
3-monitored the use of SIM's per teacher/subject area
2- monitored the use of SIM's per teacher/subject area
1- monitored the use of SIM's per teacher/subject area

5-100% of the indicators in the classroom walk-through are observed.484%-99% of the indicators in the classroom walk-through are observed.
3-68%-83% of the indicators in the classroom walk-through are
observed.
2-52%-67 of the indicators in the classroom walk-through are observed.
1-51%-below of the indicators in the classroom walk-through are
observed.
5-100% of the reports are submitted
4-the reports are submitted
3-68%-83% 5-100% of the reports are submitted
2-52%-67 of the reports are submitted
1-51%-below of the reports are submitted
5 -100% - checked updated learning logs using smart
4-84%-99% checked updated learning logs using smart
3-68%-83% checked updated learning logs using smart
2-52%-67 checked updated learning logs using smart
1-51%-below checked updated learning logs using smart
5 -100% checked forms and reports
4-84%-99%checked forms and reports
3-68%-83% checked forms and reports
2-52%-67 checked forms and reports
1-51%-below checked forms and reports

Sub-Total
Score

Teaching
learning
process
(40%)

Sub-Total
Score

Community
linkages
(10%)

5 -always collaborated with the stakeholders for thrusts, projects and

others
4 - often collaborated with stakeholders for thrusts, projects and others
3- seldom collaborated with stakeholders for thrusts, projects and others
2- Never collaborated with stakeholders for thrusts, projects and others
1- No attempt
5 -monitored 100% of PTA meetings per section in the curriculum
4 - monitored 90-99% of PTA meetings per in the curriculum
3 - monitored 80-89% of PTA meetings per in the curriculum
2 - monitored 70-79% of PTA meetings per section in the curriculum
1 - monitored 60-69% of PTA meetings per srection in the curriculum

Sub-Total
Score

Professional
Growth
(10%)

indicators:

5 motivated at least 2 teachers to attain peak performance through

awards
4 - motivated 2 teachers to attain peak performance through awards
3 - motivated 1 teacher to attain peak performance through awards
2 - no teacher is motivated to attain peak performance through awards
1- did not motivate any teacher

Encourage teachers to
enroll/attend post
graduate studies,
seminars,
trainings/scholarship
grants

Special tasks/
Assignments
(5%)

Assist in the
imnplementation of
school policies and
programs

January
to March
2016

January
to March
2016

5%

5 -100 % encouraged at least two teachers for related studies and

training
4- 84-99% encouraged at least two teachers for related studies and
training
3-68-83% encouraged at least two teachers for related studies and
training
2- 52-67% encouraged at least two teachers for related studies and
training
1-51%encouraged at least two teachers for related studies and training

5%

5 -100 %- Assisted in the formulation of school programs and policies

4- 84-99% Assisted in the formulation of school programs and policies
3-68-83% Assisted in the formulation of school programs and policies
2- 52-67% Assisted in the formulation of school programs and policies
1-51%Assisted in the formulation of school programs and policies

Sub-Total
Score

*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned