Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied

S.O.
e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web
Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed

Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R VOL.10 issue.24 .15/06/2016
Editorial : Honourable Judges Do Your Duty or Resign

-
Judges , Police bound to pay for case delays
We once again appeal to Honourable CJI , Supreme Court of India to take action on the
following PILs , to answer the show cause notice and to order the concerned public servants to
answer RTI questions. The officials of SCI dont even have etiquette , decorum to reply to our
letters. Some of my appeals are two decades old.
Remember the basic fact you are all enjoying 5 star pay , perks at the expense of public and
owe your duty to public. Are not judges drawing huge salaries , 5 star pay , perks on time
without fail , on 01st of every month? Have they forgotten to take salary in 25 years , but they keep
cases pending for 20 - 25 years. CJI weeping before Prime Minister shows the weakness of the
judiciary & a shame to the nation. Judges never consider sufferings of weeping litigants in
cases. Judges themselves are responsible for long pending cases.
Dont refer the case to police as they dont have power , authority to enquire high & mighty
people , judges & previously they have failed and the case is to subject some police officials ,
judges themselves to enquiry. Referring the case to police is nothing but attempt to bury the
truth , only supreme court monitored transparent enquiry by CBI is right.
Delaying tactics of judges is only helping the criminals , anti nationals and terrorists. Please
refer below mentioned sample cases of Justice delayed for years to innocents , sufferings of their
family members. No judges , police are bothered. Are not the the respective judges , police guilty
of defaming those innocent persons , spoiling their livelihood , gross violation of their civil rights ?
why not those guilty judges , police are paying compensation to victims of their wrong actions ?
But the very same guilty judges , police are SHAMELESSLY enjoying 5 star pay perks from public
exchequer for decades.
Bail system , Parole system are in favour of rich crooks in india , cases of rich crooks move at
faster pace wheeas the cases of poor which are although older still continues. Judiciary , its
system are biased. Consider the sample cases of sanjay dutt , salman khan , jayalaita. Our judges ,
Police dont have spine to enforce rule of law on rich crooks , while they put full force , might on
poor innocents.
If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents Chief Justice of India together with

jurisdiction police & District Collector will be responsible for it.
Rot in judiciary is decades old. Honourable CJI sir , weeping is not right constitution of india has
given you the authority , TAKE ACTION DO YOUR DUTY. People , History will remember you forever
with respect. Anyway you are getting very good 5 star pay & perks , will also get decent pension
after retirement from government. First forget about post retirement postings , discretionary
allotment of sites , etc from government then you can work fearlessly. Both central & state
governments are biggest litigants in the country , IAS babus make wrong application ,
interpretation of laws leading to litigations. Start by clearing the rotten eggs within the judiciary.
When judiciary & police in a country strictly uphold law , work impartially that country surpasses
even heaven.
Do remember on the D Day , in the Court of Almighty everybody CJI , Judges , prime ministers ,
common man alike has to bow his head. In whos court there is no match fixing , no techinicalities ,
no vociferous hi fi advocates , no bias based on caste , religion , region , community , etc , only
straight simple account of wrongs & rights. Guess his judgement in your case. GOD BLESS US ALL.
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
Date : 08.06.2016..Yours sincerely ,
Place : Mysuru..Nagaraja.M.R.
PIL
Justice Delayed & Justice Denied
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Justice of India
& Others
....Respondents
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT
IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India.
The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
a. Every human being , every Indian citizen are equal and guaranteed equitable justice as their human right and
Constitutional right.
b. In india mafia of powers that be and government ensure that cases drag on for years , so that poor litigant
either dies before judgement day or opts out in the middle. Due to this delaying tactics , many poor people rather
suffer injustice instead of seeking justice in courts. Mafia indirectly forces them to keep away from litigation.
c. Due to occupation induced health problems my health is deteriorating day by day , some of the PILs concerning
national security , public welfare I have filed are two decades old , still no justice in sight. Judges not even
admitted the cases.
d. Actual working hours , working days for judges are less in india. Too many case adjournments , less number of
judges , too many holidays for judges like summer vacation , winter vacation , working hours less than 8 hours per
day , etc.
e. Judges work less but enjoy 5 star pay & perks at public expense.
f. Due to denial of justice common people suffer injustice for more time or till their death. Say some falsely
implicated persons suffer in jail for years till their acquittal by courts , some petty criminals whose crime attracts
one year imprisonment suffers in jail for ten years. Because they are not well connected , cannt afford hi fi
advocates , bail fees.
g. Due to lethargic judiciary , some land acquisition cases drag on for years land looser suffers also the
project cost escalates by hundreds thousands of crores of rupees.
h. The lethargic Judiciary in India itself is the biggest violator of common mans human rights , fundamental
rights. It is the culprit responsible for loss of thousands of crores of rupees to public exchequer due to project cost
escalations.
i. when a common mans human rights , human rights is violated in the form of delaying tactics by court of
law , judiciary , the presiding judge becomes a criminal and liable to pay damages to the aggrieved.
j. The central government and state government yearly spend thousands of crores of rupees unnecessarily like
purchasing new cars for ministers , renovation , interior decorations of ministers bungalows , foreign jaunts , etc.
These are all not priority one spending. Out of these spending how many more judges could be appointed , paid
salaries.
k. when compared to project cost escalations of thousands of crores of rupees caused due to case delays , is it
not wise on the part of government to appoint requisite number of judges with additional budget burden of few
crores of rupees.
l. Both central and state governments are the biggest litigants in the country.
m. Government is manipulating judicial process by denying finance to appoint more judges , to create more court
infrastructures.
n. We common people are imposed with time limits to mandatorily comply with, in our interactions with other
public , with government authorities , with courts itself. For our failures we common people are penalized.
0. Paradoxically , there is no mandatory time limits for judges , public servants to finish specific works concerning
public. In most of the cases they adopt delaying tactics , deny justice still they are not penalized and dont pay any
compensation to the aggrieved public.
p. Due to delaying tactics of judges , many anti national crimes , terror attacks took place and still continuing which
could have been well averted in time if judges took timely action. For helping mafia by the way of delayed justice ,
mafia rewards some of those judges with post retirement postings , promotions , site allotments , etc.
q. The Judiciary has the right , authority , power to order government to allocate finance for appointing judges ,
setting up court infrastructure. If the government gives ruse of no money in its account , courts can definitely
monitor spending of government , cut down on waste , non-priority spending of government , divert such money for
appointment of judges , court infrastructure development. No need for CJI to weep before prime minister. Judges
themselves never consider the sufferings of weeping litigants. It shows the weakness of CJI and a shame to our
nation.
We once again appeal to Honourable CJI , Supreme Court of India to take action on the following
PILs , to answer the show cause notice and to order the concerned public servants to answer RTI
questions. The officials of SCI dont even have etiquette , decorum to reply to our letters. Some
of my appeals are two decades old.
poor innocents.

even heaven.
2. Question(s) of Law:
Is it right for judges to deny justice . is it right on the part of judges to delay justice under various ruses to common
man , violate their human rights , fundamental rights.
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of judges , police , public servants responsible for case delays.
4. Averment:
Please read details at :
Honourable Chief Justice of India TAKE ACTION
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honourable-cji-take-action ,
https://www.scribd.com/doc/312858947/Honourable-CJI-Take-Action
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to
issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the
questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail ,
DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted ,
even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are
sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , common men & see how careless our judges are towards anti national
crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are
admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.
PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to
issue instructions to the concerned public servants , Tax Authorities , Law Enforcement Agencies , RBI authorities in
the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the below RTI questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case.
c. To legally prosecute responsible , concerned
judges , police & public servants.
d. To cancel winter , summer vacation holidays for judges.

e. To bring down the holidays of courts per year to twelve on the lines of industrial establishments.
f. To make it mandatory for judges to conduct court hearings for 8 hours per day.
g. To bring down unnecessary court adjournments.
h. to reserve precious court timings only for arguments , cross examination of litigants , witnesses.
i. to use information technology , internet for issue of notices , summons and litigants submitting documents ,
applications instead of wasting court time.
j. to introduce working of courts on shift basis in the same infrastructure.
k. to appoint retired judges immediately to bring down gaps in judges requirement.
l. to order the biggest litigant government of india and all state governments to frame laws strictly in
accordance with constitution.
m. to order governments to give proper training for public servants , IAS officers , KAS officers , others about law
of the land.
o. to make specific public servants personally responsible for wrong applications of law while discharging their
duties and to make them pay compensation from their personal pockets.
p. to order Chief Justice of India to pay compensation of Rupees TWO CRORES to Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice , towards the damages he has suffered due to delayed justice.
q. to order the respective judges , police in all cases of case delays more specifically in the below mentioned cases to
pay compensation to innocent victims. Make a guideline for compensation payment. Legally prosecute guilty judges ,
police.
r. to frame a guideline for bail & parole procedure. When it is violated by judges , police , jail authorities , other public
servants order them to pay compensation and legally prosecute guilty judges , police , jail officials.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Dated : 08.06.2016 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
After 29 years, man acquitted of stealing Rs 57

KANPUR: Some times justice delayed is not merely justice denied but downright cruel. Wrongly accused of pocketing
Rs 57.60, postman Umakant Mishra remained suspended from his government job for nearly 30 years. He retired three
years ago and was absolved of the charge in a court last month, but he remains a shattered man.
Umakant worked in a post-office in Harjinder Nagar area of Kanpur. Department authorities at the post office handed
Mishra Rs 697.60 in cash to distribute as money-order. Of the total Rs 697.60, Umakant distributed Rs 300 and the rest
he claimed to have returned to his senior colleagues. But they accused him of stealing Rs 57.60 and lodged an FIR
against him.
That was on
July 13, 1984. A case was registered against him for stealing Rs 57, and he was promptly
suspended. The police booked him for criminal breach of trust.
It took nearly 350 hearings and 29 years for Umakant to prove himself innocent, but the loss he suffered in this period
was enormous. The judgment was delivered by a metropolitan magistrate on November 25.
Umakant wept when he was approached for an interview. Struggling to find words, Umakant said, "I retired three years
ago and remained suspended for nearly 26 years. I have no idea what to say or do."
His wife Geeta said, "I am relieved and happy with the verdict, but if we'd got justice at the right time, our children's
career wouldn't have got ruined. We lived with the stigma and financial trouble for so long that our future is
destroyed."
"This is apathy at its worst. We lost everything, borrowed money for our livelihood, children's
education and marriage," she said. "Without regular income, we had trouble arranging for the
education and marriage of our children. We sought donation to marry off our two daughters. Since we
could not educate our children, our son Ganga has an insecure job.
Maharashtra: After acquittal, man wants back 7 years lost in jail
Shetye is now sitting on hunger strike seeking to meet Devendra Fadnavis and demanding that seven
years of his life be returned.
With the uproar over actor Salman Khan getting bail on the same day of his conviction still fresh in the mind, comes a
heart-rending story that highlights how our justice system works.
40-year-old Gopal Shetye was acquitted by the Bombay High Court on Thursday. However, there was nothing to rejoice
for this man except the consolation of being proved innocent. Shetye is now sitting on hunger strike at the Azad
Maidan seeking to meet Chief MinisterDevendra Fadnavis and demanding that seven years of his life be returned
during which his world turned upside down.
His release came three months after he had completed his seven year sentence in a rape case. Shetye of Nagpur's
Narked had appealed in 2010 after he was convicted by the fast track court in Mumbai's Sewri.
Lawyer Ramesh Majgaonkar said Shetye had twice applied for bail before the Bombay High Court but these were
rejected. It was his third bail application that bore fruit.
During the incarceration, Shetye lost his father, his wife remarried (with his consent) and his two little daughters were
left in an orphanage. "I want seven years of my life back. I demand justice," said Shetye. The order overturning the
conviction reveals how the police tried to frame an innocent.
"Since the whole accusation against the appellant was based on a solitary piece of evidence - his identification as the
culprit not previously known to her - by an illiterate victim, who also came from a lower strata of the society and who
could, therefore, be susceptible to the suggestions from the investigating agency, it was not safe to base the
conviction of the appellant on such a piece of evidence," the high court observed.
Justice Abhay Thipsay concluded that the identity of Shetye has not been satisfactorily established and hence
overturned the conviction.
Justice delayed is justice denied, President Pranab Mukherjee says on pendency of cases
Chief Justice of India Tirath Singh Thakur said if bar association cooperates, judges will be ready to work even on
Saturdays to clear pending cases.
President Pranab Mukherjee on Sunday said justice delayed is justice denied, and pitched for speedy and affordable
justice to all. He said there are over three crore cases pending in various courts across the country, reported IANS.
"The government and the judiciary are collectively addressing this issue through an ongoing increase in the sanctioned
strength of judges. These posts need to be filled quickly, he said while addressing the 150th foundation day of the
Allahabad High Court.
Chief Justice of India Tirath Singh Thakur, who was also present at the event, said bar association has "not been very
very cooperative" in disposal of cases, reported PTI. He said he can assure the lawyers that if bar cooperates, judges
will be ready to work even on Saturdays to clear old matters, especially related to people languishing in jail for years.
He also said the country's judiciary, as an institution, is facing crisis of credibility, and asked judges to be conscientious
of their duties.
During the Patna High Court centenary celebrations on Saturday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had expressed concern
over the large number of cases pending in courts for years. He had suggested that the courts should come out with an
annual bulletin, mentioning the number of pending cases to help judges and lawyers tackle them in a time-bound
manner.The CJI was also present at the event.
A Chief Justice of India says "I am sorry" but 30 years too late
By Shanmugham D Jayan and Raghul Sudheesh
When a former Chief Justice of India apologises for a judgement, thats big news. And Justice P N Bhagwati was not
just apologising for any judgement.
He was admitting his mistake about a case the New York Times called close to the Indian Supreme Courts utter
surrender to an absolutist government.
That case was ADM Jabalpur, popularly known as the Habeas Corpus case. On 28 April, 1976, during the Emergency,
the Supreme Court had to decide if the Court could entertain a writ of habeas corpus filed by a person challenging his
detention. The High Courts had already said yes. But the Supreme Court went against the unanimous decision of all
the High Courts and upheld the right of Indira Gandhis government to suspend all fundamental rights during the
Emergency. Four judges ruled for the government. One of them was Justice P N Bhagwati.
The lone dissenter was Justice H R Khanna. The New York Times wrote at that time:
If India ever finds its way back to freedom and democracy that were proud hallmarks of its first eighteen years as an
independent nation, someone will surely erect a monument to Justice H R Khanna of the Supreme Court. It was Justice
Khanna who spoke out fearlessly and eloquently for freedom this week.
Justice Bhagwati was admitting his mistake about a case the NY Times called close to the Indian Supreme Courts
utter surrender to an absolutist government. Reuters
Now 30 years later Justice Bhagwati says in an interview withMyLaw.net his judgment was an act of weakness. He
also says, it was against my conscience...That judgment is not Justice Bhagwatis.
This might sound like a brave mea culpa on his part. But unfortunately it leaves a lot to be desired.
First of all there is Justice Bhagwatis own track record of having his ear finely tuned to the prevailing political winds.
Justice Bhagwati has praised Indira Gandhi government during the Emergency and later criticized her during the
tenure of Janata government. When Indira Gandhi came back to power, he wrote a letter congratulating her.
Heres an excerpt from that letter:
May I offer you my heartiest congratulations on your resounding victory in the elections and your triumphant return
as the Prime Minister of India...I am sure that with your iron will and firm determination, uncanny insight and dynamic
vision, great administrative capacity and vast experience, overwhelming love and affection of the people and above
all, a heart which is identified with the misery of the poor and the weak, you will be able to steer the ship of the nation
safely to its cherished goal.
What this really shows is that CJI Bhagwati might have gone against his conscience but certainly not against his career
trajectory. Justice H R Khanna, who dissented in that Jabalpur case should have become the CJI because of his seniority.
But he paid the price for that dissent. He was superceded by Justice Beg. Justice Bhagwati would likely have met with
the same fate of Justice H R Khanna had he dissented.
This is not the only issue where Justice Bhagwati has made a volte face.
Take the mysterious collegium system by which Supreme Court justices are appointed which has come under heavy
criticism for being an unaccountable opaque cabal. It was Justice Verma who created the collegium system but in
theFirst Judges Case (the SP Gupta case) Justice Bhagwati wrote about it: There must be a collegium to make
recommendation to the President in regard to appointment of a Supreme Court or High Court Judge.
Justice Bhagwatis mind has now changed about that as well and he says he is against the collegium system in toto.
His own track record as a judge has also raised legal eyebrows.
Noted constitutional law jurist HM Seervai has criticised Justice Bhagwati for merely copying justice Krishna Iyers
judgment in the Som Prakash case and incorporating it into his judgment in the Ajay Hasia case.
In a landmark case of constitutional law, popularly referred to as the Minerva Mills judgment, Justice Bhagwati wrote:
Unfortunately we could not be ready with our judgment and hence 9 May,1980 being the last working day of the
Court before the summer vacation we made an order expressing our conclusion but stating that we would give our
reasons later.
A judge of the Apex Court saying "I am not ready with my reasons but this is my conclusion" anyway sets a deplorable
standard for the Indian judiciary.
Justice Bhagwati writes, that after the Emergency he realized the mistake of Jabalpur and he practically rewrote Part III
and Part IV of the Constitution; particularly Articles 14, 19, 21 and 32. A judge claiming that he is writing the
Constitution, as opposed to interpreting it is unorthodox to say the least.
These days Justice Bhagwati is more in the news because he is a trustee with the beleaguered Sathya Sai Trust. As
financial scandals rock the Sai Babas spiritual empire, the trust relies on people of the eminence of a former CJI to
give it some credibility. Immediately after the demise of Satya Sai Baba Justice Bhagwati was appointed as chancellor
of the Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning (Deemed to be University). Recently in an interview given to The
Times of India Justice Bhagwati said: Sai Baba, my god, dictated my every single judgment.
People will make of that what they will. But the real question now is what does this apology mean for the Indian
judiciary. Some will think its proof of the self-correcting mechanism of the Indian judiciary. But its also proof of
something much more damning - that political equations play a crucial role in the appointment of judges and the
judgments these judges deliver.
What happened in the Habeas Corpus case was not a momentary lapse in judgment. It was a disgrace to the Supreme
Court, and more so because Justice Bhagwati says it went against his conscience, even then.
This belated apology does not restore the faith of people in judiciary. The only way to do that is to have an
independent judicial commission appoint judges and bring in transparency in every stage of their appointment.
It may save us from a Bhagwati-style apology another 30 years later.
Bastar, India, where the innocent lose years in jail
In a tough stance against Maoists, police incarcerate people for years, only to release them for lack of evidence
by Raksha Kumar
BASTAR DISTRICT, India Irpa Narayan limps as he walks the jungles around his village, Bellamnendra an injury
from the seven years he spent in jail for suspected anti-state activity before being acquitted. He was forced to sit six
hours a day with his knees pressed to his chest in an overcrowded cell of the Jagdalpur Central Jail.
After being jailed for more than five years, he faced trial in 2013. In January 2014, he was finally granted bail.
However, the bail required him to deposit 10,000 rupees ($150) in the courts as bond. Since he could not afford that
sum, he remained locked up as his case dragged on.
He was acquitted in June 2015 after a judge found no reason for his incarceration.
I was taken to jail for no reason and kept there for no reason, said Narayan, 32. And now I have to start building my
life from scratch.
Experts say his story is shockingly common: More than 96 percent of those arrested from 2005 to 2012 in the five
districts of Indias central Bastar district were set free by the trial courts because of lack of evidence, and two-thirds of
those arrested spent two to five years in jail before facing trial.
This is according to the Jagdalpur Legal Aid Group, a nonprofit group based in Bastar that filed right to information
applications in 2013 to obtain relevant government records.
In other parts of the country, the police work toward getting evidence so the accused can be convicted. Here the
purpose of the arrests is not to get them convicted. Most of the cases are false anyway. It is just to intimidate the local
populace, said Shalini Gera, a lawyer with the group.
Because data from close to four dozen police stations in Bastar region are not digitized, the only way to arrive at the
number of people who are arrested is by looking at the number of people who are incarcerated.
According to National Crime Records Bureau figures for 2013, while detention facilities in Chhattisgarh are designed to
accommodate 5,850 people, there are 14,780 inmates. This figure includes convicts and people awaiting or under trial.
The facilities in Bastar are overcrowded, at 252 percent to 400 percent of capacity, compared with the national
average of 112 percent, according to Indias National Crime Records Bureau.
False arrests
In Chhattisgarh, for more than three decades the government has been fighting a bloody battle with a leftist guerrilla
group commonly referred to as Maoists. The mineral-rich areas of the state have attracted large corporations from all
over India.
While the government quells all opposition to mining, some Maoists fight to keep industrialization out of the jungles.
This battle drives a wedge between those who support the government and those who support the Maoists. These
divisions are quiet, however, because if they took sides openly, they would risk the ire of the opposing party.
False arrests are just one tactic used to scare people from speaking out against government policies, according to Alok
Shukla, the community organizer for Chhattisgarh Bachao Andolan, a cluster of nonprofit organizations working in the
state. The authorities are trying to ensure that the Maoists get as little support from the local population as possible,
he said.
Most of these cases need not be tried at all, said Gera. The courts reserve the right to dismiss them on the basis of
inconsistencies in the first information report and the charge sheet filed by the police. In Narayans case, for example,
the report, filed in February 2008, indicates he was arrested for possessing a bow and three arrows and being present
in the jungles in the midst of a police gunbattle with Maoists. Al Jazeera America has seen the documents, which
appear to be hastily handwritten notes.
But Narayan lives in those jungles. And it is common for Adivasis, Indias indigenous people, to use bows and arrows to
hunt. Since the report does not say that he was wielding a gun or participating in the battle, the court could have
dismissed the case or instructed the police to dig for more evidence before they booked a case.
But courts wont risk dismissing cases in these areas, for the fear of being termed pro-Maoist, said a local lawyer
who requested anonymity to avoid possible reprisals. In other parts of the country, a case such as Narayans would
hold no water, as it is weak in its details and evidence. In Bastar, such cases are abundant.
Narayans account of that day differs significantly from the police version. He said he was sitting on a cane cot in his
hut, sipping black tea when half a dozen paramilitary forces approached him. He said they shot two bullets in the air to
scare his neighbors away and then informed him that he was being arrested for anti-state activities and being a
Maoist supporter.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Bastar in May and witnessed the signing of multimillion-dollar agreements
for Ultra Mega Steel Plants and railway lines to aid those plants. According to Shukla, there has been an escalation in
such arrests since then, although official figures are not available.
Geras phone is constantly busy with calls from all over Bastar from people seeking her help for what they say are false
arrests. We cant take on all the cases, even though they are equally important, she said. We are happy on the
days when we get less than half a dozen distress phone calls.
The local people have been forest dwellers, and the forest is their main source of livelihood. Locals are with the
Maoists in this. We do not want industry that would destroy our livelihoods and render us unemployed, said a resident
of Rowghat, in eastern Bastar, speaking on condition of anonymity because he fears he would be targeted by the
government for speaking out.
Bastars inspector general has not responded to Al Jazeera Americas questions and interview requests.
Gang-raped by police
NGOs have been pushing for investigations into claims of sexual violence against incarcerated women in
India.Jagadeesh NV / EPA / Corbis
In January 2008, a 17-year-old girl from Sukhma district was arrested by the police for allegedly being involved in the
killing of 23 paramilitary personnel. She was kept in a police station for 10 days without being charged.
There, she said, she was repeatedly gang-raped by policemen before being taken to a judge. She said that she couldn't
muster the courage to tell the judge what the police had done to her and that she was so weak, she could barely stand
up.
The judge remanded her to the Jagdalpur Central Jail. For more than seven years, she was kept in a cell that held about
35 inmates. Most of the women there were detained on false charges of being Maoists, the woman, now 24, said.
She spoke to Al Jazeera on condition of anonymity because of the social stigma that rape carries.
She said the brutal rapes damaged her genitals and her intestine. Yet I had to plead for medical care to be given to
me, she said. Whenever she did, she was taken to a doctor. But her health gradually worsened. She still experiences
debilitating pain in her stomach and pelvic region.
The problem with court proceedings of most of these cases is that the witnesses are all police personnel, said Gera.
In other parts of the country, police are allowed to be witnesses, but their testimonies are given less importance. They
are expected to bring in other, objective witnesses to crimes.
Bastar, though, is Indias most militarized region. And in many cases, the only witnesses are the police. The courts are
left with little choice.
Two policemen said they witnessed the girls criminal activities, according to official police documents. But they didn't
show up in court for her case for more than a year, claiming they were busy with work in other areas of the state or
were on leave.
When they finally appeared, they said they had little information regarding her involvement, and they did not have any
evidence against her.
The girl was released acquitted for lack of evidence in March. Now 24, she said she has only two reasons to be
sad: In a country where rape is stigmatized, she believes no one will ever marry her, and she has friends in the jail who
are as innocent as she and remain incarcerated.
I wish I could do something to ensure they return safely, she said, with tears in her eyes.
Fifty-four Years In Jail Without Trial: The Plight Of Prison Inmates In India
By Parwini Zora
Machang Lalung, aged 77, was released from incarceration last month in the northeast Indian state of Assam after
spending more than half a century behind bars awaiting trial.
Lalung had been arrested at his home village of Silsang in 1951 under section 326 of the Indian Penal Code for
causing grievous harm. According to civil rights groups who have investigated Lalungs case, there was no
substantive evidence to support the charge against him. In any event, those found guilty of this offence typically
receive sentences of no more than 10 years imprisonment.
Less than a year after he was taken into custody, Lalung was transferred to a psychiatric hospital in the Assamese
town of Tezpur. Sixteen years later, in 1967, doctors confirmed that he was fully fit to be released, but instead he
was transferred to Guwahati Central Jail, where he was imprisoned until this summer.
It seems the police just forgot about him thereafter, Assamese human rights activist Sanjay Borbora told the BBC.
Borbora was among those who brought Machangs case to the attention of the National Human Rights Commission
(NHRC). As a result of the Commissions intervention and other protests, Lalungs case was finally heard and he was
released after paying a token bond of one Indian rupee.
He is a simple villager and his life has been destroyed by a cruel system. He should sue the authorities for millions of
rupees, but I do not think he is even aware he could do it, said Borbora.
According to a Scotsman.com news report, the NHRC has taken up the cases of four other men awaiting trial in Assam:
Khalilur Rehman has been in custody for 35 years, Anil Kumar Burman for 33 years, and Sonamani Deb for 32 years,
while Parbati Mallik has been detained in a psychiatric unit for 32 years.
Though these individual cases have now gained media attention, the phenomenon of accused persons having to
endure unconscionable delays awaiting trial is the norm in the Indian justice system. In 2002, some three quarters of
all persons held in Indian prisons had not been sentenced to jail, but were under trialthat is, awaiting trial.
The largest number of under-trial or remand prisoners is to be found in the jails of Uttar Pradesh, Manipur, and
Meghalaya, where more than 90 percent of the prison population have reportedly not faced trial.
According to a National Crime Research Bureau (NCRB) study, Crime in India 2002, nearly 220,000 cases took more
than 3 years to reach court, and about 25,600 exhausted 10 years before they were completed. A staggering number
of prison inmates awaiting trial have already been imprisoned longer than the most rigorous sentence that they could
ever be given for the offence they are alleged to have committed.
A long record of appalling conditions
Many of Indias prisons date back to the era of British colonial rule, with thousands of prisoners kept in crumbling
facilities largely unchanged since the beginning of the last century. The only major all-Indian prison reform ever
implemented dates back to the Indian Jails Committee of 1919-1920.
The Indian prison system perpetuates many of the injustices of the penal system set up by the British. For example,
inmates of foreign origin or of high caste and social status are routinely imprisoned under relatively better conditions
and segregated from those inmates who are poorer and of lower social position. Larger or less-crowded cells, access to
books and newspapers, and more and better food are offered to those prisoners classified as Status A prisoners.
Meanwhile, the poor and especially tribal and Dalit (ex-untouchable) inmates are subject to various forms of abuse,
ranging from the denial of visitors and refusal to provide medical care, to prolonged labor, sexual harassment, rape
and concealed physical and mental torture.
Our judicial and penal system in its actual working obviously discriminates between the rich and the poor.... If you are
poor and have once landed in jailfor whatever reason or no reasonthe probability of your being back in jail off and
on is fairly high, concluded Raman Nanda, who complied a prison investigation in 1981, one of the few sources of
information available about the Indian prison population.
Most of those who are nabbed by the police and are unable to have themselves bailed out are the poor. Those with
resources, the big criminals, the smugglers, corrupt politicians, tax evaders are people who are rarely caught. Thus our
institutions penalise not the violators of law but the poor, stated Nandas study.
In the 1980s, the All India Commission for Jail Reforms (The Mulla Committee) found that the majority of the prison
population was from a rural and agricultural background and that first offenders involved in technical or minor
violations of law accounted for a large number of prisoners. Many inmates are imprisoned for non-payment of fines or
an inability to afford good legal representation.
Among the worst-affected groups are women with children and the mentally ill. Female prisoners account for 3.12
percent of the total jail population and are allowed to keep their children until they reach the age of five. According to
available statistics, 1,400 children younger than five are accompanying their mothers in jails.
Last year, the Pakistan-based Dawn news site quoted Zahira, a mother of two and woman prisoner in the Trihar prison,
as saying, Our fate depends on the mood of the wardens or medical officer. I didnt have regular check-ups during my
pregnancy, which is against the rules. Irfan (her infant son) was not weighed at birth. There are no cribs, baby food or
warm milk.
The absence of adequate psychiatric institutions and medical services in India contributes to the large prison
population. Individuals with severe mental illnesses, branded as non-criminal lunatics, are often imprisoned. With
many mentally vulnerable prisoners left to suffer without support in a brutal environment, it is not surprising that there
is a high rate of suicides of prison inmates and police detainees. However, there is also evidence that authorities term
as suicides deaths that were caused by police and jail guard abuse.
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) was created as a statutory body in 1993 and has since periodically
issued directions about jail conditions. It suggested a prison reform bill in 1996, but this has been ignored by various
governments, including those led by the Hindu-supremacist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Congress and supported
by the Left Front.
In fact, there is evidence that the situation facing Indias prisoners is getting worse. At the end of 2002, there were
322,357 inmates in the jails of 26 States and 6 Union Territories, although their authorised capacity was just 219,880,
meaning there was overcrowding, according to the governments own norms, of 46.6 percent.
The maximum overcrowding was recorded in the jails of Mizoram (442 percent), followed by Jharkhand (260 percent),
Delhi (211 percent), Haryana (165 percent), Andaman and Nicobar (139 percent) and Chhatisgarh (115 percent). As
compared to the previous year, it was noted that jail overcrowding had increased in the states of Delhi, Madhya
Pradesh, Goa, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
New Delhis Tihar Prison, also known as the Central Jail, is said to be the worlds largest prison facility. Although built
to house 4,000 inmates, it currently holds 12,000, 80 percent of whom are awaiting trial.
Starting with the 1991 reforms, the Indian bourgeoisie has been imposing rigorous cuts in education, health care,
social services and agricultural subsidies. The unprecedented social devastation and growth of inequality that has
resulted from the policies of successive Indian governments have found partial expression in the countrys growing
crime rate. The police have responded to this social crisis with frequent arbitrary round-ups in poor areas and
discrimination against socially vulnerable sections of the working masses.
Rising number of custodial deaths and abuse
The police repression that has accompanied the past 14 years of free-market economic reforms has caused Indias
already antiquated and overstretched prison system to descend into an even greater state of chaos and human
misery. According to Indian Home Ministry records, deaths while in remand or custody increased from 1,340 in 2002 to
1,462 by the end of 2003. According to an NHRC report, a large proportion of the deaths in custody were from natural
and easily curable causes aggravated by poor prison conditions. Tuberculosis caused many deaths, and HIV/AIDS
remained a serious health threat among prison inmates.
Non-governmental organisations that deal with prisoner abuse allege that deaths in police custody, which occurred
within hours or days of initial detention, often implied violent abuse and torture. The Home Ministry reported that there
were 28,765 complaints lodged against police for April 2003 for abuse including deaths. In May of last year in
Ambedkarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, police arrested a daily labourer and tortured him when he failed to pay a Rs. 50,000
(US$1000) bribe. According to media reports, police admitted the victim to the hospital under a false name after
injecting him in the rectum with petrol.
Police also threatened to harm his family if he reported the incident. In July 2004, the NHRC requested a report from
Punjabs Inspector General of Prisons after a man incarcerated in Amritsars Central Jail claimed the Deputy
Superintendent and other prison officials branded him on his back when he demanded water and better treatment.
Doctors found fresh scars on his back that had been inflicted with hot iron rods. By years end, no action had been
taken.
The rape of persons in custody is also part of the broader pattern of custodial abuse. Prisoner charities argue that rape
by police, including custodial rape, was more common than NHRC figures indicate, since many rape incidents go
unreported due to the victims shame and fear of retribution.
A statement from the Asian Legal Resource Centre, on custodial deaths and torture in India, handed to the National
Human Rights Commission and to the Sixty-first Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights in Geneva, notes:
Any person, who dares to complain about police officers in India, faces the wrath of the law enforcement agency.
Abhijnan Basu, who was serving his prison sentence at the Presidency Jail, West Bengal, was one such person who was
not so lucky. Officers at the prison murdered him because he dared to complain about the inhuman conditions and the
poor quality of food. Three prison wardens set him ablaze on November 12, 2004.
Torture in India is widespread, unaccounted for and rarely prosecuted. It contributes to the state of anarchy and
lawlessness in many parts of the country. Torture is used as a cheap and easy method of investigation and also as a
tool for oppression. In the hands of the wealthy and influential, Indian law enforcement agencies have also
strengthened links with criminal elements. Even the judiciary in India cannot sever this nexus, between police and
criminals.
The state of Indias penal and justice systems speaks volumes about the true nature of human rights and social
equality in a country routinely held up by the Western media as the worlds largest democracy.
8 People Who Were Executed and Later Found Innocent

Itd be nice to think our judicial system is totally infallible, but unfortunately, thats just not the case. Innocent people
are convicted of crimes they didnt commit more often than anyone would like to admit, and in some cases, people
who were later found to be innocent have actually been put to death.
Here are 8 people who were executed and innocent.
1. Cameron Todd WillinghamIn 1992, Willingham was convicted of arson murder in Texas. He was believed to
have intentionally set a fire that killed his three kids. In 2004, he was put to death. Unfortunately, the Texas Forensic
Science Commission later found that the evidence was misinterpreted, and they concluded that none of the evidence
used against Willingham was valid. As it turns out, the fire really was accidental.
2. Ruben CantuCantu was 17 at the time the crime he was alleged of committing took place. Cantu was convicted
of capital murder, and in 1993, the Texas teen was executed. About 12 years after his death, investigations show that
Cantu likely didnt commit the murder. The lone eyewitness recanted his testimony, and Cantus co-defendant later
admitted he allowed his friend to be falsely accused. He says Cantu wasnt even there the night of the murder.
3. Larry GriffinGriffin was put to death in 1995 for the 1981 murder of Quintin Moss, a Missouri drug dealer. Griffin
always maintained his innocence, and now, evidence seems to indicate he was telling the truth. The first police officer
on the scene now says the eyewitness account was false, even though the officer supported the claims during the trial.
Another eyewitness who was wounded during the attack was never contacted during the trial, and he says Griffin
wasnt present at the crime scene that night.
4. Carlos DeLunaIn 1989, DeLuna was executed for the stabbing of a Texas convenience store clerk. Almost 20
years later, Chicago Tribune uncovered evidence that shows DeLuna was likely innocent. The evidence showed that
Carlos Hernandez, a man who even confessed to the murder many times, actually did the crime.
5. David Wayne SpenceSpence was put to death in 1997 for the murder of three teenagers in Texas. He was
supposedly hired by a convenience store clerk to kill someone else, but he allegedly killed the wrong people by
mistake. The supervising police lieutenant said I do not think David Spence committed this crime. The lead homicide
detective agreed, saying My opinion is that David Spence was innocent. Nothing from the investigation ever led us to
any evidence that he was involved.
6. Jesse TaferoIn 1976, Tafero was convicted of murdering a state trooper. He and Sonia Jacobs were both
sentenced to death for the crime. The main evidence used to convict them was testimony by someone else who was
involved in the crime, ex-convict Walter Rhodes. Rhodes gave this testimony in exchange for a life sentence. In 1990,
Tafero was put to death. Two years later, his companion Jacobs was released due to a lack of evidencethe same
evidence used to put Tafero to death.
7 & 8. Thomas Griffin and Meeks Griffin The oldest case on this list dates back to 1915. The Griffin brothers, two
black men, were convicted of the murder of a white man. The reason they were convicted is because Monk Stevenson,
another black man suspected of committing the murder, pointed to the brothers as having been responsible. He later
admitted the reason he blamed them is because they were wealthy, and he assumed they had the money to beat the
charges. The Griffin brothers were completely innocent, but they were put to death nonetheless.
Presumed Guilty: After 14 wasted years in prison, life begins anew

n the night of 20 February 1998, in the Sadr Bazaar area of Delhi, a young man walked to the
neighbourhood hakeemseeking treatment for a persistent kidney stone problem. The 18-year-old had just said
his namaaz at the Madrasahwaali Masjid and, in pain, decided to walk across the desolate marketplace by day this is
one of the busiest spots in the city, but at night it empties like a sieve even more so in the '90s, when Indian retail
did not shriek with the vehemence of today.
As the boy walked he noticed an unmarked white Maruti Gypsy sidle up along the kerb behind him. It moved slowly,
prompting him to quicken his pace, though he continued to walk, staring ahead. The Gypsy overtook him and then,
without warning, a pair of hands shoved him in the back. He raised his hands to protect himself from falling, but before
he knew it he'd been hauled into the Gypsy. Blindfolded, hands tied and mouth gagged in a matter of seconds, trapped
in a mlange of elbows, insults and accents, he was driven to a destination 40 minutes away and deposited in a room.
Here he was routinely beaten, tortured, fed at the rarest possible intervals, and made to sign blank papers and
disclosure agreements. There was no question of providing access to legal representation.
The boy left that room seven days later, when he was taken to Delhi's Tees Hazari Court to be charged with 17 cases of
murder, terrorism and waging war against the nation. By the time he was acquitted of the charges brought against him
the High Court ruled that any evidence connecting the accused to the bombings was "woefully absent"
Mohammed Aamir was 32 years old. He spent 14 years "ground in the mortar and pestle" of the Indian justice system
(main kanoon ke chaal mein pis kar aa raha hoon). In the years before he could once again walk into the modest room
in Azad Market where he was born, his father had died, his mother left mute and paralysed by a stroke.
******
Mohammad Aamir gives this account of the events of that night and the following years. The version presented by the
investigative authorities to the courts is remarkably different, starting with the date Aamir was purportedly taken into
custody (seven days of detainment without being presented to a judge is a violation of one of the foundational writs of
the Indian Constitution, Habeas corpus; it is regularly argued in cases like this that security agencies misrepresent the
date they picked up a prisoner so they are not in violation of this writ).
28 February 1998, when Aamir was produced before the Tees Hazari Court, the investigative authorities said they
picked him up with an array of incriminating evidence on his person. One wonders why an 18-year-old terrorist
mastermind would carry to a rendezvous amidst a Webley & Scott revolver, live cartridges, American currency and
diaries with details of explosive materials his ration card, birth certificate, school character certificate, school
identity card, and even marksheets from Class 5 and 7 from his school in Farashkhaana.
As has been reported in Two Circles (the website that broke the story) and The Hindu, the police version is pocked with
allegations that only throw up more questions the reason the cases were summarily dismissed by almost every
judge they came before. The police claim that they came upon Aamir and the youth he planned the 17 bombings with,
Shakeel, via two Bangladeshis they had been tracking. This version holds that they saw these two Bangladeshis leave
Aamir's house in Sadr Bazaar and so followed them to Old Delhi Railway Station, where they rendezvoused with Aamir
and Shakeel (Shakeel, the other alleged "mastermind", was found in 2009 hanging from the ceiling in his cell in Dasna
Jail; later, Jail Superintendent V.K. Singh was charged with his murder). The prosecution did not make clear why Aamir
and Shakeel would choose to rendezvous in a crowded railway station if the Bangladeshis were already staying with
them.
{Aamir was driven to a destination
and deposited in a room, where
he was routinely beaten, tortured,
fed at the rarest possible
intervals, and made to sign blank
papers and disclosure
agreements.
In 1996 and '97, a rash of "low-intensity" terrorist attacks in the National Capital Region had security agencies worried
by their failure to find conclusive leads in any of the cases. There is some indication that the attacks were part of a
concerted campaign; each explosive device had similar constituent ingredients. The investigators alleged that Shakeel
and Aamir admitted in their respective disclosure statements to making these bombs in a small factory in Pilakhua.
Yet, as the courts have now recorded, the public witnesses present during the raid on the factory in Pilakhua flatly
refused to support the prosecution. Chandra Bhan, the prosecution's "star witness", told the court that he was taken to
Chanakyapuri police station and made to sign blank papers.
Of the 17 cases brought against Mohammed Aamir, he was found Not Guilty at the Sessions Court level in 12. He was
found Guilty in three cases, for which he was given life imprisonment in one (FIR 631) and 10 years in the two others.
These immediately went on appeal to the High Court. On 4 August 2006, Justices Sodhi and Bhasin of the Delhi High
Court, pronouncing on the case for which Aamir was given life imprisonment, said: "The prosecution has failed
miserably to adduce any evidence to connect the accused-appellant with the charges framed, much less prove them.
Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the judgment of conviction...set aside."
******
This, sadly, was not the end of Aamir's legal trouble. In 2007, when he was close to completing the 10 years mandated
(notwithstanding that both cases remained on appeal), two more cases were brought to trial, this time for bombings in
Rohtak and Ghaziabad. Proper procedure suggests these cases should have been initiated when Aamir was first
incarcerated, in 1998. Holding off until 2007 meant he was forced to remain in police custody even after he completed
his ten years inside, something his lawyer, N.D. Pancholi, terms "customary mischief-making". It was only in January
2012, when those cases were completed he was found Not Guilty again that he was allowed to return home.
By coincidence, the same week Aamir was released, The New Yorker published Adam Gopnik's remarkable report on
patterns of incarceration in the United States ("The Caging of America", 30 January 2012). From the introduction: "A
prison is a trap for catching time. It isn't the horror of the time at hand but the unimaginable sameness of the time
ahead that makes prisons unendurable for their inmate. What prisoners try to convey to the free is how the presence
of time as something being done to you, instead of something you do things with, alters the mind at every moment."
Aamir's 14 years in prison, on charges refuted adamantly from the outset, devastated his life and ambitions in ways
hard for us to comprehend.
Sitting in the same small room with cracking walls in Sadr Bazaar that the authorities called a terrorist hideout and he
calls home, Aamir tells the tale of his incarceration: "After my first appearance, at the Tees Hazari court in '98, I was
put on remand for 10 days, so I was taken to a police station. After they had elicited 'admissions' that I was involved in
all the blasts in the NCR between '96 and '98, I was moved from station to station, still on remand, because they
wanted to file FIRs in each of the cases. This went on for two and half months. When finally in April or May I was sent
to Tihar Jail it came as a huge relief. To be in police remand is the worst first they do their 'questioning', where I'm
sure you know what all takes place. In jail it is better. In the police station, even at night, the guys guarding your cell
will come and abuse you, kick you around a bit, call you 'katua'.
"I then spent almost nine years in Tihar Jail, where I managed to do some reading about my legal circumstances." He
pulls out two tattered books, the Constitution of India and a book of legal norms, both in Hindi, and a purple folder of
see-through plastic filled with carefully highlighted and annotated legal papers. Picking up the Constitution, Aamir
says: "The thing is, I still have a lot of faith in this document. I have not been to college, but I have read this book from
cover to cover and I know it can protect those who need it. It is people who ruin what this book stands for. Actually,
even that is too harsh. During my 14 years inside the system I met all kinds of people some people were very good
to me. Some were terrible. There are all kinds of people on earth, that is something I have learned.
"Then I was sent to Ghaziabad's Dasna Jail, which was even tougher. I spent more than three years there, and perhaps
90% of the time was spent in high-security, normal procedure for people booked in terrorism cases. You have to spend
22 out of 24 hours in absolute isolation. For months on end you barely communicate with anyone at all."
Gopnik quotes in his article an essay Charles Dickens wrote in 1842 upon visiting a solitary confinement wing in an
American prison: "I hold this slow and daily tampering with the mysteries of the brain, to be immeasurably worse than
any torture of the body: and because its ghastly signs and tokens are not so palpable to the eye and sense of touch as
scars upon the flesh; because its wounds are not upon the surface, and it extorts few cries that human ears can hear;
therefore I the more denounce it, as a secret punishment which slumbering humanity is not roused up to stay."
The effects of this prolonged and, the courts now agree, unjust detainment on Aamir are discernible during longer
conversations. He has a stilted way of talking, and his face will periodically break into a nervous smile. If making a long
point, he sometimes loses the thread as he speaks. "I've noticed these since I got out. The doctor tells me I have high
blood pressure now, and that I should try and get psychiatric counselling. I lose my temper from time to time" this is
harder to imagine, as he is exceedingly polite with us "and shout at my nephew. It's been hard not to be able to talk
to my mother. I would like to hear from her lips that she is happy I am out. But, bechaari, she cannot say anything."
******
This past Wednesday, in the sylvan quiet of the Gandhi Peace Foundation, I meet N.D. Pancholi, the High Court lawyer
arguing Aamir's two pending appeals. It is perhaps an appropriate venue J.P. Narayan was arrested from this spot in
1975, at the outset of the Emergency.
"It doesn't matter who is in power," he says. "The government very rarely exercises the control they should. They heed
the security agencies, with their ears and eyes shut to anyone else instead of directing them, the government is
directed."
"I have been working on cases like this for 20 or so years now. Aamir's case is sad, but one of many." Ferozekhan
Ghazi, Aamir's lawyer at the Sessions Court level, agrees: "After '95, these cases began to proliferate. I've worked on
somewhere between 30 and 40 cases of this nature and have won acquittals in most. Remarkably, every Kashmiri
whose case I've worked on has been acquitted boys who came to the capital as businessmen and carpet sellers,
picked up by the authorities and left to languish in jail for years."
So is the situation as bad as ever? Pancholi says things have become better since POTA [the draconian Prevention of
Terrorism Act, 2002] was repealed. "Now most cases will be charged under the Unlawful Activities Act, or what Aamir
was charged of, waging war against the nation. The number of cases might have reduced, but it is still a prevalent
practice."
Mohammed Aamir was also lodged in Delhis Tihar jail.

On a national level, the most deleterious consequence of such mala fide practices is their undercutting of resources,
manpower and intelligence that should be used to prevent acts of terrorism in India. One tactic is to paint certain
communities in a threatening light; Azamgarh was first pointed to as a hotbed of terrorist activity. Then, just after the
High Court blasts in September, reports in all the leading newspapers, citing unnamed security sources, said
Madhubani (in Bihar) was India's new "breeding ground of terror". Within weeks, Delhi Police arrested seven young
Muslim migrants from Madhubani and charged them with involvement in the blasts. All seven, including the alleged
"mastermind" were released in January, after the National Investigative Agency demanded the right to question them
and exonerated them of all charges.
Muslim activists argue that such wanton arrests do little to curtail terrorist activity, and investigators ignore more
dangerous threats to the integrity of the country. One activist, who asked for anonymity, said: "Can someone tell me
why the Hizb-ut-Tahrir, an organisation that has been responsible for deaths over the world, is allowed to hold
meetings in the heart of Delhi, on Lodhi Road? This organisation demands an Islamic kingdom uniting all Muslim
countries. Indian Muslims have never espoused such politics this is a genuinely worrying development. And our
security agencies know all about them, yet don't stop them from meeting. Why is that?"
All the while, the Congress party continues to play its insidious double game with the Muslims of India, on the one
hand sending stooges in skullcaps to places like Azamgarh to talk of tears shed and sorrows appropriated, on the other
allowing the varied wings of its security forces to freely indulge in a deadly regime of religious profiling.
******
From the same purple folder containing his legal documents Mohammed Aamir pulls out a sheet of paper and hands it
to me. "While I was in Ghaziabad prison, I won a competition for essay writing. I wrote on Mahatma Gandhi I had just
finished reading Experiments with Truth and I beat every other prisoner in UP who took part. They took me to the
Central Jail in Lucknow, where the Superintendent gave me Rs 200 and a T-shirt. I know these do not seem big things,
but when you are in prison, the Superintendent is the badshaah, and we are all his ghulaam. If the badshaah says one
good word to you, you feel great. Here, on that day, he talked to me with respect, even treated me as an equal."
It is haunting, this eagerness Aamir has to impress upon me his patriotism and respect for government authority. This
system proscribed an extended and systematic reversal of his most basic human rights, yet Aamir speaks with the
fervour of one who has tasted its bitterest truths. It is clear he cannot countenance another encounter. Perhaps this is
one way to birth patriotism. I feel a sudden urge to throw his words in the face of every stalwart who can casually
question the fidelity of 150 million citizens of India.
"I tried to spend my time in prison constructively," he says. "There are so many bad influences, but I tried to read and
learn as much as I could. I kept faith that once I was out of this mess I would get a good job. That my country would
once again treat me as its own."
Justice Delayed- Justice Denied

Bhaskar De
"Without Justice, life would not be possible and even if it were it would not be worth living" ......Giorgio Del Vecchio
(Justice)
Notion as theory of law can be defined as a study based on presupposes or ideal which a men seek for its realization
through law, called as Theory of Justice. The word justice has been derived from the actual concept of justness which
acts as the primordial factor for any state to provide for its populace. The concept of justice was vitiated with various
welfare, moral and psychological factors. Harmonious surveillance of these three features acts as a social tool, which
makes justice accessible to all.
Justice is a generic term, which includes both procedural (Natural) and substantive (Social) justice. In India, justice has
been adorned as the very embodiment of God, whose sole mission is to uphold justice, truth and righteousness. Under
our Indian constitution Justice sets the ultimate goal for all of us to serve our nation. It is a mixture of natural and
social justice as evident from Preamble and Part IV of our constitution. The concept of Justice being so important is
used only twice in our Indian Constitution, i.e. in Preamble and in Art 39 A.
In Preamble it sets out as- to secure to all its citizens- Justice- Social, economic and political and Article 39 A states
that the state to secure equal justice and free legal aid for the citizens.
Our current stress on justice itself is a reminder of the fact that justice is not available to us.
II. Democracy And Indian Judiciary
In a democratic country like India, judiciary plays a vital role in establishing a state of justice. Therefore being the
watchdog, they are not allowed to shift their burden to others for their failure to establish an actual State of Justice. It
is judiciary on which millions of people have struck their faith of getting justice. It has the capability of imparting
justice to the aggrieved. It is that part of our constitution which acts as its Messiah. It is that structure of our society,
which cemented its place next to the God and if not properly dispensed will shatter down the entire trinity of
democratic instrumentalists with checks balances, parliamentary structure and the judicial facets of our constitution.
Generally, aggrieved with lots of pain anguish and hope in their heart approaches the court of law for their grievances
to be clarified but at the end of the day the procedural lacuna left them with bare hands. They are denied of their most
important right of Justice.
In India, Justice is beyond the reach of most and the right of access to it is not communicated to the citizens properly.
In many a circumstances it was found that the litigant who has had access to the court failed to obtain quick relief and
for some never have the opportunity even to knock the doors of the court due to ignorance and poverty. If we want
justice to be accessible to all, then it must be relieved from the Laissez faire pattern, where justice like other
commodity can be purchased and initiative must be taken to educate the populace.
Quest for justice has nothing to do with procedure or jurisdictional aspect rather it cares for its speedy disposal. Delay
in disposal of cases is considered as one of the most vexed and worrying problem. It is the code of procedures, which
makes it so worse. However personality like Nani Phalkiwala opined that Justice in common parlance is considered as
blind but in India it is lame too and hobbles on crutches. It is on the verge of collapse with more than 30 million cases
clogging the system. There are cases that take so much of time that even a generation is too short to get any type of
redressal.
Procedures must be utilized to advance the cause of justice but in India it is used to thwart it. Justice is something
which should be dispensed as early as possible otherwise it will be too late for a critic to add a common adage to that
Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. Current situation shows that it will take more than 300 years to clear the backlog of
cases in Indian courts. In Anil Rai vs. State of Bihar case, Sethi J stated that Delay in disposal of the cases facilitates
the people to raise eyebrows, sometime genuinely, which if not checked, may shake the confidence of the people in
this judicial system. Thereafter this problem of delay in justice delivery system had engaged attention of our law
commission for a quite a long time. To cope up with this situation they have proposed several amendments. But the
position retains unchanged.
III. Reasons For Delay In Disposal Of Cases
Firstly, Increase in litigation-people now days are in a habit of dragging their point of grievances to the court of law,
which rather can be solved outside the purview of the court. Secondly, non-adherence with the code properly by the
judges and the lawyers both add to same cause in a greater extent. Thirdly, the judicial system is not equipped with
actual number of judges required so. Fourthly, Government can be termed for contributing maximum to the backlog.
While it can be understood that delay may occur in the civil cases but the same is not expected in the criminal
proceedings. If we compare these two on the basis of its disposal then it is very much advent that criminal justice
system is at its worst and this position leads to a situation where the common man had lost its complete trust on the
efficacy of the criminal redressal system.
While B.P.Singh J gave an approx statistics showing an average disposal and pendency of cases which would rather
reveal the actual state of justice in India today:
On average 50 lakh crimes are registered every year, which are sought to be investigated by the police. The pendency
of criminal cases in subordinate courts is 1.32 crore and the effective strength of judges is 12,177. Pending cases of
the under trials in criminal cases are 1.44 crores. In an average 19 percent of the pending cases, disposed every year.
Delayed decisions, piled up files and indefinitely extending projects, never serve their purpose. They are the real
roadblocks to development of any state or nation. Generally, delayed decisions take its maximum toll from the under
privileged section as Poor section of our society, who were always treated as animals. They are often denied of their
bare amenities of life.
Consider the condition of the poor victims of Bhopal gas Leak disaster, which took a toll of 15000 people. Twenty years
had passed to that ghastly incident; still now victims were fighting for its compensation, which fails to measure up the
damage caused to them. Consider the terrible situation occurred in August 1991 as massacre of Dalits at Tsundur in
Andhra Pradesh. 13 years had passed to that incident, the families of the victims of Tsundur, still await justice for those
who died. They say, they will not find any peace until the guilty are punished for their crime. Consider the condition of
those girls who were brutally gang raped during the Godhra riots in front of their helpless family members. Consider
the case of Jessica lal, where Delhi police yet to grab Manu Sharma, key accused, still able to safeguard himself from
the clutches of the judicial administration. Still her family members await justice to be delivered. Consider the victims
of Best Bakery case who still awaits justice to be dispensed in their favour but the climax starts with the key witness in
the case turned hostile and the entire fate of the Bakery case is in turmoil. Today the victims of the all the aboveenumerated cases know full well that the price of truth is extremely high.
Still they are waiting

But for what?
Whether all these amounts to justice?
IV. Conclusion
Social justice will be possible only if the entire concept of egalitarian politico-social order is followed, where no one is
exploited, where every one is liberated and where every one is equal and free from Hunger and poverty. The proverb
Justice Delayed is Justice Denied is proved as it is denied to the poorest of the poor. Providing basic necessities to
them will amount to Justice because the definition of justice varies from individuals to individuals on the basis of its
economic conditions. According to B.P.Singh J the situation today is so grim that if a poor is able to reach to the stage
of a high court, it should be considered as an achievement.
At this juncture the author is of the opinion that judiciary obviously owes an obligation to deliver quick and inexpensive
justice irrespective of the complicated procedures but it cannot be hurried to be buried. Cases should be decided for
imparting justice not for the sake of its disposal. Secondly, Arbitration procedure must be utilized as a better option for
quick disposal of cases. Finally, to conclude with the words of Lord Hewet as it is of fundamental importance that
justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.
Delayed justice: When judgement day arrives too late

It is high time the SC adopts a system to keep track of reserved judgements in the interest of the public
The heavy backlog of cases and delays in the Indian judicial system are once again the topic of much discussion, with
everything from government callousness to over-litigiousness to judicial activism being blamed for the 35 million cases
pending in the courts at all levels.
There are actually two separate but related problems being spoken about: the problem of delay and the problem of
high pendency.
Various factors are responsible for the problems, and in order to address them, it is essential to study the data in depth
to try and identify what are their causes.
A recent survey of litigants conducted by Daksh, a civil society organization that undertakes research and activities to
promote accountability and better governance in India, showed that more than 60% of the respondents believed that
the delay in their own cases was due to the judge not passing orders quickly enough.
While this relates to ongoing cases, it is a reflection of the perception among a large section of the population. It may
not be entirely correct on the part of the litigant to attribute all the delay to the judge since the lawyer and the other
party are also part of the proceedings.
Click here for enlarge

However, there is one stage where the responsibility for delay (if any) can be placed solely on the judgedelivery of
judgement after arguments are complete. When a case is heard in depth and arguments are advanced by both parties,
more often than not, the judge reserves judgementto examine the arguments, do research and write the
judgement before delivering it in an open court.
While the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, applicable to civil courts, states that judgements should be delivered within
30 days of arguments being closed, no such time restriction is found in the context of Section 353 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1974, which prescribes the manner in which a judgement is to be delivered in a criminal case.
No provisions exist for the time to be taken in delivering judgements by the high courts and the Supreme Court.
The need for a time limit for delivering the judgement is not just to avoid delay, but also to prevent a miscarriage of
justice.
A judge who takes too long to deliver judgements after hearing arguments may have forgotten some of the arguments
or remembered them incorrectly to the detriment of the parties.
The slow moving wheels of Indian judiciary

For this reason, even though no procedural law prescribes so, the Supreme Court has held in Anil Rai vs State of Bihar
case that parties can file an application in the high court seeking an early judgement if its not delivered within three
months of it being reserved. If its not delivered more than six months after being reserved, parties have a right to
have it re-heard before a different bench of the high court.
Does the Supreme Court itself adhere to this timeline?
I looked at the judgements delivered by the Supreme Court in 2015, of which 487 contained details of the date on
which the order was reserved and the date on which the judgement was delivered.
While some of the remaining judgements were dictated in open court, the others had no details of when the
judgement was reserved and so havent been included in this study. The time taken to deliver the judgement in these
487 cases is shown in the chart above.
While judgements were delivered within 30 days in 62% of the cases, in at least 85 cases (17%), the Supreme Court
failed to adhere to the informal timeline it had laid down for the high courts. In 12% of the cases, the court took more
than 120 days to deliver its judgement after having reserved it. The average time taken to deliver judgements in 2015
was 55 days and the median time was 21 days.
While the median time would suggest that the Supreme Court by and large delivers judgements within a month of
arguments concluding, the number of cases where the delay is long and unexplained are not insubstantial. In nine
cases, the judgement was delivered more than one year after being reserved, with the maximum time taken being 566
days.
Although all the cases in which it took more than one year to deliver the judgement were civil appeals, a broader
picture suggests that there is no substantial difference between civil and criminal appeals when it came to the time
taken to deliver the judgements.
The difference in the average length of time taken to deliver judgements in civil appeals cases as compared to criminal
appeals cases can possibly be attributed to the fact that of the 20 judgements which took the most time to be
delivered, only two are criminal appeals. In a criminal appeal, the maximum time taken to deliver a judgement after
having reserved it was 325 days.
What the numbers show is that while a judgement is delivered within time in a bulk of the cases, there are a significant
number that are slipping through the cracks and taking up much longer than they should.
In the recent past, judgements in two cases that involved highly important questions of law were delivered more than
a year after the judgement was reserved.
When Subramanian Swamy sought a direction from the court to the then prime minister, Manmohan Singh, to grant
sanction to prosecute telecom minister A. Raja for corruption in the 2G spectrum case, the court took 433 days to
deliver its judgement after having reserved it.
In the Naz Foundation case concerning the validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, the judgement was
delivered 624 days later, or more than 20 months after being reserved.
The relatively large number of cases where the judgement is delivered more than 90 days after being reserved by the
bench suggest the absence of a system to keep track of how long a case has been reserved for judgement.
From the information available on the Supreme Court website, it is not possible to determine with any accuracy how
many judgements have been reserved and for how long.
A recent Right to Information application seeking details of cases that have been reserved for judgement was denied
by the Supreme Court.
Ironically enough, the Supreme Court has prescribed precisely such a monitoring mechanism for high courts in the Anil
Rai vs State of Bihar case to ensure that too much time doesnt elapse before a judgement is delivered.
Given that the Supreme Court itself has slipped in ensuring the timely delivery of judgement to litigants, it is high time
perhaps that the apex court adopts a system to keep track of reserved judgements in the interests of transparency
and accountability to the litigating public.
In search of lost time

By Uzma Falak
https://indiapoliticalprisoners.wordpress.com/2015/09/13/a-chronicle-of-a-kashmiri-man-acquitted-after-more-than-18years-of-incarceration/
Indian System of Bail - Anti Poor
Urvashi Saikumar
Justice as we know was a right fundamental to all, but it's fallacy is evident, as money now results in its
fall
Objectively analyzed the criminal jurisprudence adopted by India is a mere reflection of the Victorian legacy left behind
by the Britishers. The passage of time has only seen a few amendments once in a while to satisfy pressure groups and
vote banks. Probably no thought has been given whether these legislations, which have existed for almost seven
decades, have taken into account the plight and the socio-economic conditions of 70% of the population of this
country which lives in utter poverty. India being a poverty stricken developing country needed anything but a blind
copy of the legislations prevalent indeveloped
western countries.
The concept of bail, which is an integral part of the criminal jurisprudence, also suffers from the above stated
drawbacks. Bail is broadly used to refer to the release of a person charged with an offence, on his providing a security
that will ensure his presence before the court or any other authority whenever required.
Meaning of Bail
Bail, in law, means procurement of release from prison of a person awaiting trial or an appeal, by the deposit of
security to ensure his submission at the required time to legal authority. The monetary value of the security, known
also as the bail, or, more accurately, the bail bond, is set by the court having jurisdiction over the prisoner. The
security may be cash, the papers giving title to property, or the bond of private persons of means or of a professional
bondsman or bonding company. Failure of the person released on bail to surrender himself at the appointed time
results in forfeiture of the security. The law lexicon[1] defines bail as the security for the appearance of the accused
person on which he is released pending trial or investigation.
Courts have greater discretion to grant or deny bail in the case of persons under criminal arrest, e.g., it is usually
refused when the accused is charged with homicide.
What is contemplated by bail is to "procure the release of a person from legal custody, by undertaking that he/she
shall appear at the time and place designated and submit him/herself to the jurisdiction and judgment of the court."
[2]
A reading of the above definition make it evident that money need not be a concomitant of the bail system. As already
discussed above, the majority of the population in rural India, lives in the thrall of poverty and destitution, and don't
even have the money to earn one square meal a day. Yet, they are still expected to serve a surety even though they
have been charged with a bailable offence where the accused is entitled to secure bail as a matter of right. As a result,
a poor man languishes behind bars, subject to the atrocities of the jail authorities rubbing shoulders with hardened
criminals and effectively being treated as a convict.
History of Bail
The concept of bail can traced back to 399 BC, when Plato tried to create a bond for the release of Socrates. The
modern bail system evolved from a series of laws originating in the middle ages in England.
Evolution in England
There existed a concept of circuit courts during the medieval times in Britain. Judges used to periodically go ?on
circuit? to various parts of the country to decide cases. The terms Sessions and Quarter Sessions are thus derived from
the intervals at which such courts were held. In the meanwhile, the under trials were kept in prison awaiting their
trials. These prisoners were kept in very unhygienic and inhumane conditions this was caused the spread of a lot of
diseases. This agitated the undertrials, who were hence separated from the accused. This led to their release on their
securing a surety, so that it was ensured that the person would appear on the appointed date for hearing. If he did not
appear then his surety was held liable and was made to face trial. Slowly the concept of monetary bail came into
existence and the said undertrials was asked to give a monetary bond, which was liable to get forfeited on nonappearance.
In The Magna Carta, in 1215, the first step was taken in granting rights to citizens. It said that no man could be taken
or imprisoned without being judged by his peers or the law of the land.
Then in 1275, the Statute of Westminster was enacted which divided crimes as bailable and non bailable. It also
determined which judges and officials could make decisions on bail.
In 1677, the Habeas Corpus Act was added to the Right Of Petition of 1628, which gave the right to the defendant the
right to be told of the charges against him, the right to know if the charges against him were bailable or not. The
Habeas Corpus Act, 1679 states, "A Magistrate shall discharge prisoners from their Imprisonment taking their
Recognizance, with one or more Surety or Sureties, in any Sum according to the Magistrate's discretion, unless it shall
appear that the Party is committed for such Matter offenses for which by law the Prisoner is not bailable."
In 1689 came The English Bill Of Rights, which provided safeguards against judges setting bail too high. It stated that
"excessive bail hath been required of persons committed in criminal cases, to elude the benefit of the laws made for
the liberty of the subjects. Excessive bail ought not to be required."
Current Practice
In 1976 the Bail Act 1976 came into force. It sets out the current and the basic legal position of bail prevailing in
England. It lays out that there is a general right to bail, except as provided for under the First Schedule of the Act.
While there are different grounds for refusing the right to bail depending on the type of offence, for all imprison able
offences the two basic grounds are as set out by the O'Callaghan decision. But there is also the additional ground that
if the court is satisfied that there are "substantial grounds for believing" that the defendant if released on bail will
commit an offence while on bail, bail may be refuse.
Under section 5(3) of the Bail Act 1976 the court which withholds bail is required to give reasons, so that the defendant
can consider making an application.[3] In practice, however, the reasons given by English courts on a variety of
standard forms are frequently short and not explicitly based upon particular facts and factors. Stone's Justices' Manual
suggests that magistrates announce any decision to refuse bail merely by relating the grounds and statutory reasons
in short form.[4]
English administrative law also requires that, where there is an existing obligation to give reasons for a decision, the
reasons given be clear and adequate, and deal with the substantial issues in the case.[5]
The English courts use tick boxes for recording the grounds and the reasons for not granting bail. There is a use of a
standard pattern that which lists out the various reasons for not granting the bail. These forms vary in their precise
configuration, but in substance they are all the same as all of them set out the grounds for refusing bail in one column,
and a number of possible reasons for the findings those grounds established in another column. The decision is
recorded by ticking the relevant box in each column. But the decisions recorded on standard forms might be at risk of
being characterised as "abstract" or "stereotyped", and therefore inadequate. The quality of the reasons given directly
reflects the quality of the decision-making process.
Evolution in America
According to the San Francisco News and the SF Chronicle, the first modern Bail Bonds business in the United States,
the system by which a person pays a percentage to a professional bondsman who puts up the cash as a guarantee
that the person will appear in court, was established by Tom and Peter P. McDonough in San Francisco in 1898. Infact,
this was the same year that the Bill of Rights was introduced in England, and the Congress passed the Judiciary Act.
This specified which types of crimes were bailable and set bounds on a judge's discretion in setting bail. The Act states
that all non-capital crimes are bailable and that in capital cases the decision to detain a suspect, prior to trial, was to
be left to the judge. In 1791 The Bill Of Rights was incorporated into Constitution of the United States, through the 5th,
6th and 8th Amendments, guaranteeing citizens the right to due process of law, a fair and speedy trial and protection
against excessive bail. The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides that "excessive bail
shall not be required," but it does not provide any absolute right to bail.
Current Practice
Under current law, a defendant has the right to bail unless there is sufficient reason not to grant it. The main reasons
for refusing bail according to the Bail Act 1976 are that there are substantial grounds for believing that the defendant
(1) will abscond; (2) will commit further offences whilst on bail; or (3) will interfere with witnesses. Conditions may be
applied to the grant of bail, such as living at a particular address or, rarely, paying an amount into court or having
someone act as surety. Release on bail is sometimes referred to as police bail, where the release was by the police
rather than by a court.
The alternative to being granted bail is being remanded into custody (also called being held on remand).
In America, every accused person is entitled to a hearing at which evidence relevant to his individual case is
considered to determine the amount of bail necessary. No precise rule can be laid down that will determine the amount
of bail required in any particular instance. Bail is to be fixed according to the circumstances of each case. The matter is
generally one for the sound discretion of the trial court. Although the determination of the trial court is subject to the
review in the appellate courts for abuse of discretion, ordinarily the appellate courts will not interfere if the amount set
by the trial court is reasonable and not excessive.
The amount of a bond should, of course, be sufficient to assure the attendance of the defendant upon the court when
it is required. The bond should be fixed in such amount that will exact vigilance on the part of the sureties to see that
the defendant appears in court when called.[6]
Both the Federal Constitution and state constitutions contain provisions against excessive bail. Bail set at an amount
higher than reasonably calculated to insure that the accused will appear to stand trial and submit to sentence if
convicted is excessive, and falls within the proscription of the Federal Constitution if set by a federal court, or of the
particular state's constitution if set by a state court. But no hard-and-fast rules for determining what is reasonable bail
and what is excessive bail have been laid down. That the bail is reasonable which, in view of the nature of the offense,
the penalty attached to the offense, and the probability of guilt of defendant, seems no more than sufficient to secure
attendance of the defendant.[7]
The amount of bail, in and of itself, is not finally determinative of excessiveness. What would be reasonable bail in the
case of one defendant may be excessive in the case of another.[8] As indicated below, such matters as the past
criminal record of the defendant, and the nature of the crime committed and the punishment therefore, are material
factors in determining whether bail is excessive.
Where two or more cased are pending against a defendant, the fact that bail in one case, considered by itself, is
reasonable, does not prevent the collective amount required in the several cases from being excessive.
The gist of the problem confronting a court in setting the amount of bail is to place the amount high enough to
reasonably assure the presence of defendant when it is required, and at the same time to avoid a figure higher than
that reasonably calculated to fulfill this purpose, and therefore excessive. The general rule in federal courts is to try to
strike a balance between the need for a tie to the jurisdiction and the right to freedom from unnecessary restraint
before conviction, under the circumstances surrounding each particular accused.[9] In other words, in determining the
amount of bail, the good of the public as well as the rights of the accused should be kept in mind.
The Bail Reform Act of 1966 provides for the release of defendant on his personal recognizance or upon execution of
an unsecured appearance bond in an amount specified by the judicial officer before whom he appears, unless the
officer determines, in the exercise of his discretion, that such release will not reasonably assure the appearance of
defendant as required, in which event specified conditions of release which will reasonably assure defendant's
appearance for trial may be imposed. The Bail Reforms Act, 1966 was initiated by President Johnson who felt that
under the Federal Rules, bail in an amount higher than reasonably calculated to be necessary to assure the presence
of the accused is excessive.
It has been stated that the factors to be taken into consideration in determining the amount of bail are:
(1) ability of the accused to give bail,
(2) nature of offense,
(3) penalty for the offense charged,
(4) character and reputation of the accused,
(5) health of the accused,
(6) character and strength of the evidence,
(7) probability of the accused appearing at trial,
(8) forfeiture of other bonds, and
(9) whether the accused was a fugitive from justice when arrested. [10]
That the accused is under bond for appearance at trial in other cases should also be considered.
A major factor in determining the amount of bail in a current matter is the character and former criminal record of the
defendant. It has been held, however, that the criminal activities and tendencies of a person applying for bail on a
charge of vagrancy do not justify the fixing of bail at an excessive amount for the purpose of keeping him in jail.
In determining the amount of bail, voluntary surrender may be considered as an indication that the defendant has no
intention of absconding from justice. On the other hand, it is also proper, in setting a higher bail figure, to take into
consideration the fact that at the time of arrest the accused was a fugitive from justice, or the fact that the defendant
has previously absconded while under indictment.
Even where bail is a matter of right, the fact that a person has previously forfeited bail is a factor to be considered in
determining the amount of bail; in such a case bail may be set in such amount as will reasonably assure the presence
of the defendant at court, although bail may not be refused altogether.[11] In setting the bail, the court may also
consider the behavior or misbehavior of the defendant during parole from prison on a previous criminal conviction.
The probability of the establishment of guilt at the trial, or the existence of doubt as to the guilt of the accused, is a
proper consideration in determining the amount of bail. Hence a court, in determining the amount of bail, may
consider the character and strength of the evidence by which the crime charged is supported.
A court should give some regard to the prisoner's pecuniary circumstances, since what is reasonable bail to a man of
wealth may be equivalent to a denial of the right to bail if exacted of a poor man charged with a like offense.[12] An
accused cannot be denied release from detention because of indigence, but is constitutionally entitled to be released
on his personal recognizance where other relevant factors make it reasonable to believe that he will comply with the
orders of the court.[13]
However, bail is not rendered excessive by the mere inability of the accused to procure bail in the amount required. In
other words, the extent of the pecuniary ability of the accused to furnish bail in not controlling, if it were, the fixing of
any amount, no matter how small, where the accused had no means of his own and no friends who were able or willing
to become sureties for him, would constitute a case of excessive bail, and would entitle him to got at large on his own
recognizance. It is the incarceration of those individuals who cannot meet established money bail requirements,
without meaningful consideration of other possible alternatives, which infringes on both due process and equal
protection requirements.
The current American position is stated as follows in a standard treatise "There is power in the court to release the
defendant without bail or on his own recognition."
The Legal Position in India
The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C. hereinafter), does not define bail, although the terms bailable offence and
non-bailable offence have been defined in section 2(a) Cr.P.C. as follows: " Bailable offence means an offence which is
shown as bailable in the First Schedule or which is made bailable by any other law for the time being enforce, and nonbailable offence means any other offence". Further, ss. 436 to 450 set out the provisions for the grant of bail and
bonds in criminal cases. The amount of security that is to be paid by the accused to secure his release has not been
mentioned in the Cr.P.C.. Thus, it is the discretion of the court to put a monetary cap on the bond. Unfortunately, it has
been seen that courts have not been sensitive to the economic plight of the weaker sections of society. The
unreasonable and exorbitant amounts demanded by the courts as bail bonds clearly show their callous attitude
towards the poor.
According to the 78th report of the Law Commission as on April 1, 1977, of a total prison population of 1,84,169, as
many as 1,01,083 (roughly 55%) were under-trials. For specific jails, some other reports show: Secunderabad Central
Jail- 80 per cent under-trials; Surat-78 per cent under-trials; Assam, Tripura and Meghalaya-66 per cent under-trials.
One of the reasons for this is, as already mentioned above, is the large scale poverty amongst the majority of the
population in our country. Fragmentation of land holdings is a common phenomenon in rural India. A family consisting
of around 8 ? 10 members depends on a small piece of land for their subsistence, which also is a reason for disguised
unemployment. When one of the members of such a family gets charged with an offence, the only way they can
secure his release and paying the bail is by either selling off the land or giving it on mortgage. This would further push
them more into the jaws of poverty. This is the precise reason why most of the under trials languish in jail instead of
being out on bail.
Judicial Trend
An overview of the following cases highlight the adverse condition of the poor with regard to the unjust bail system in
India. In State of Rajasthan v Balchand[14], the accused was convicted by the trial court. When he went on appeal the
High Court, it acquitted him. The State went on appeal to the Hon'ble Supreme Court under Art. 136 of the Constitution
through a special leave petition. The accused was directed to surrender by the court. He then filed for bail. It was then
for the first time that Justice Krishna Iyer raised his voice against this unfair system of bail administration. He said that
though while the system of pecuniary bail has a tradition behind it, a time for rethinking has come. It may well be that
in most cases an undertaking would serve the purpose.
In Moti Ram and Ors. v State of M.P [15], the accused who was a poor mason was convicted. The apex court had
passed a sketchy order, referring it to the Chief Judicial Magistrate to enlarge him on bail, without making any
specifications as to sureties, bonds etc. The CJM assumed full authority on the matter and fixed Rs. 10,000 as surety
and bond and further refused to allow his brother to become a surety as his property was in the adjoining village. MR
went on appeal once more to the apex court and Justice Krishna Iyer condemned the act of the CJM, and said that the
judges should be more inclined towards bail and not jail.
In Maneka Gandhi v Union of India [16], Justice Krishna Iyer once again spoke against the unfair system of bail that
was prevailing in India. No definition of bail has been given in the code, although the offences are classified as bailable
and non-bailable. Further Justice P.N.Bhagwati also spoke about how unfair and discriminatory the bail system is when
looked at from the economic criteria of a person this discrimination arises even if the amount of bail fixed by the
magistrates isn't high for some, but a large majority of those who are brought before the courts in criminal cases are
so poor that they would
find it difficult to furnish bail even if it's a small amount.

Further in Hussainara Khatoon and others v. Home Sec,State of Bihar [17] , the Court laid down the ratio that
when the man is in jail for a period longer than the sentence he is liable for then he should be released.
Conclusion
A perusal of the above cases highlights the strong anti-poor bias of the Indian criminal justice system. Even though the
courts in some cases have tried to intervene and also have laid down certain guidelines to be followed but
unfortunately nothing has been done about it. There is also a strong need felt for a complete review of the bail system
keeping in mind the socio-economic condition of the majority of our population. While granting bail the court must also
look at the socio-economic plight of the accused and must also have a compassionate attitude towards them. A proper
scrutiny may be done to determine whether the accused has his roots in the community which would deter him from
fleeing from the court. The court can take into account the following facts concerning the accused before granting him
bail:
(1) The nature of the offence committed by the accused.
(2) The length of his residence in the community.
(3) His employment status history and his financial condition.
(4) His family ties and relationships.
(5) His reputation character and monetary conditions.
(6) His prior criminal records, including any record or prior release on recognizance or on bail.
(7) Identity of responsible members of the community who would vouch for his reliability.
(8) The nature of the offence charged and the apparent probability of conviction and the likely sentence in so far as
these factors are relevant to the risk of non-appearance.
(9) Any other factors indicating the ties of the accused to the community or barring on the risk of willful failure to
appear.
The Way Forward
It is thought that from the various schemes the government operates for rural employment, loans to farmers etc, a
portion of the funds which it transfers to the panchayat for developmental work of the same should be set aside and
kept to meet the bail amount for undertrials belonging to the particular panchayat / block. The utilization of this fund
would be in the hands of the elected leaders of the society with the representative of district collector / district
magistrate being a part of the system. This would, go a long way in securing freedom for scores of undertrials who
would then be able to contribute to society thereby
playing an important role and forming part of the national mainstream. Such a scenario will have the effect of reducing
the burden of over-crowding in jail.
The setting up of separate jails, or at any rate isolating undertrials from convicts, would prevent hardened criminals
from exercising their deleterious influence over undertrials. Such segregation would also change the attitude of jail
authorities and society at large towards under trials.
The under trials who have been charged with petty crimes can further be put in reformative homes instead and asked
to do community service till the time they are released on bail. Elementary education facilities must be granted to
those under trials who are uneducated and illiterate. Thus, I feel that the benefit of bail should not only be in the hands
of a few, but, should be available to the masses including those who do not have the financial capacity to afford it.
15 judicial officers compulsorily retired by Allahabad HC in UP
In a major action, 15 judicial officers in Uttar Pradesh have been punished with compulsory retirement by theAllahabad
High Court for doubtful integrity, negligence and poor performance.
The decision was taken at a Full Court meeting presided by Chief Justice of the High Court D Y Chandrachud held in
Lucknow on April 14, S K Singh, the Registrar General of the High Court, said.
12 Additional District Judges (ADJs) and three Additional Chief Judicial Magistrates (ACJMs) were divested of their
charges and stopped from functioning on their respective posts with immediate effect while a communique to this
effect was sent to the state government, he said.
A 10 per cent curtailment in the pension of a retired officer Ashok Kumar Saxena, against whom there were serious
complaints, has also been announced, the registrar said.
The ADJs who were posted in different districts of the state and have been given compulsory retirement are
Shaileshwar Nath Singh, Bans Raj, Ram Murti Yadav, Dhruv Raj, Jagdish, Naresh, V P Kandpal, A K Ganesh, Arvind
Kumar, Avinash Chandra, A K Dwivedi and M M Khan while the three ACJMs are Kishore Kumar, S S Singh and Shyam
Shankar.
Police Complaint against Justice T.S. THAKUR , Honourable Chief Justice of India , SCI , New Delh
To,
H.E. Honourable President of India ,
Rashtrapathi Bhawan ,
New Delhi.
Honourable Sir ,
Subject : Police Complaint against Honourable Chief Justice of India
I have sent numerous appeals to CJI , SCI through post , e mail , web since 1993 regarding
crimes , specific crime cases , no action by CJI or SCI. In some criminal cases which has been
brought to their earlier notice , CJI & SCI could have prevented it , prevented the crimes from
happening , but they didnt. They let the crime happen & let it continue till date. They might have
received something in return for favoring the criminals. Let the almighty give dogs death to such
former CJIs and their family members who thrive like PARASITES on BRIBEs & Public Money
without properly doing public duties. CJI is not answering our RTI questions properly nor
admitting , acting on our PILs. He is not even replying to our show cause notices. It is nothing but
individual failure of duties by previous CJIs and present CJI Justice. T.S.THAKUR. Previous CJIs
and Present CJI Justice T.S.THAKUR are taking huge salaries , enjoying 5 star life style out of tax
payments made by we the common people , public , child labourers. Have the previous CJIs ,
Present CJI Justice T.S.THAKUR sincerely done their constitutional duties to earn it ? Money not
earned will be either stolen or donation or alms.
Thereby CJI is aiding criminals , anti nationals , terrorists and underworld mafia. Hereby , I do
appeal to you take action against the erring CJI and accord legal sanction to criminally prosecute
chief justice of india and to transfer the complaint to respective jurisdiction police for
investigation & legal prosecution. Thank You.
Date : 23.04.2016 Yours Sincerely,
Place : MysuruNagaraja.M.R.
SHOW CAUSE NOTICE TO CJI Justice T.S. THAKUR
We the sufferers of Injustices , suffering public WISH DOGS DEATH TO CORRUPT JUDGES ,
CORRUPT POLICE & THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS WHO THRIVE ON BRIBES. In the court of Almighty ,
God there is no match fixing , we pray to that almighty to give dogs death , death , suffering due
to accident , kidney problem , heart problem , etc to corrupt judges , corrupt police & their family
members who shamelessly thrive on bribes , looted public money. They must not have sudden
death , they must suffer for months before death. Then alone they will realize the pain of the
public.
We whole heartedly salute honest few , honest judges , honest police & honest public servants
who are tirelessly upholding rule of law inspite of many obstacles , threat to themselves. We pray
to almighty to give strength , health , wealth , longevity to such honest persons.
I have sent numerous appeals to CJI , SCI through post , e mail , web since 1993 regarding crimes ,
specific crime cases , no action by CJI or SCI. In some criminal cases which has been brought to
their earlier notice , CJI & SCI could have prevented it , prevented the crimes from happening , but
they didnt. They let the crime happen & let it continue till date. They might have received
something in return for favoring the criminals. Let the almighty give dogs death to such former
CJIs and their family members who thrive like PARASITES on BRIBEs & Public Money without
properly doing public duties.
It is nothing but individual failure of duties by previous CJIs and present CJI Justice.
T.S.THAKUR. Previous CJIs and Present CJI Justice T.S.THAKUR are taking huge salaries , enjoying 5
star life style out of tax payments made by we the common people , public , child labourers. Have
the previous CJIs , Present CJI Justice T.S.THAKUR sincerely done their constitutional duties to
earn it ? Money not earned will be either stolen or donation or alms.
One of the favors enjoyed by Judges for favoring criminal nexus of ruling politicians , tacitly
aiding the crimes of ruling government is the discretionary allotment of sites to judges by the
government.
I dont know whether secretariat staff of CJI office & DARPG / DPG officials are forwarding my appeals for justice ,
e-mails to you or not. They will be held accountable for their lapses if any. This notice is against the repeated
failure of constitutional duties & indirect collusion with criminals by previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is
served against them , to the office of CJI , NOT personally against you. At the individual level I do whole
heartedly respect Honourable Justice Shri T S Thakur .
Please refer two my appeals for justice through DARPG ;
DLGLA/E/2013/00292
DEPOJ/E/2013/00679
In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom RIGHT TO INFORMATION &
EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the government,as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps & leads to
their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least bothered about the lives of people or justice to them. these
type of fat cats , parasites are a drain on the public exchequer . these people want ,wish me to see dead , wish
to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed . so that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes
of V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.
To my numerous appeals , HRWs appeals to you ,you have not yet replied. It clearly shows that you are least
bothered about the lives of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to protect the criminals at
any cost. you are just pressurising the police to enquire me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to
police station all with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy legal immunity privileges ,why dont you have given
powers to the police / investigating officer to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why dont all of you are not
appearing before the police voluntarily for enquiry ?at the least why dont all of you are not sending your
statement about the case to the police either through legal counsel or through post? you are aiding criminals ,by
denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city civil court ,bangalore , distict court ,
mysore ,etc & by illegally closing my newspaper.
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of office. this amounts to public cheating &
moral turpitude on your part.
1.you
2.you
3.you
4.you
5.you
6.you
7.you
are
are
are
are
are
are
are
making contempt of the very august office you hold.

making contempt of the constitution of india.
making contempt of citizens of india.
sponsoring & aiding terrorism & organized crime.
violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens of india and of neighbouring countries.
violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER to which india is a signatory.
obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.
8. As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you have caused me damages / losses to the tune
of RUPEES TWO CRORE ONLY.
Read full case details at :

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/chief-justice-terror-links
you are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you cannt be legally
prosecuted for the above mentioned crimes .
If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a
result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB
personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but
never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty .
this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward
happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , etc ,
the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants , Chief Justice of India &
Jurisdictional District Magistrate will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file
fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore
as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that
compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered
by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty judges , police officials , public servants
& Constitutional fuctionaries. Thanking you. Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.
Date : 23.04.2016...yours sincerely,

Place : Mysore , India.Nagaraja M R
1.
PIL - CJI a Criminal ?
Case of Fence eating the crops ? Guard himself stealing ? Accountability of Judges a MUST
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice ,
# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
.....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others

....Respondents
IN THE NATURE OF
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them
, due to honest efforts of those few noble persons only at least democracy is surviving in India.
A . "Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of
straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in
political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the
House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill
has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants & Judges.
Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
B . As per the preamble of the constitution of India all the people , all Indian citizens are equal in every respect ,
equally entitled to justice , equally responsible to uphold constitution . Only People , Citizens of India are supreme No
Judges , No Ministers , etc are supreme. Judges , ministers , president etc are all public servants constitutionally
mandated to SERVE the public , NOT to master over them. Even after 69 years of independence these judges ,
ministers have not come out of colonial hangover instead become worse treating general public as their servants.
C . Every institution in india is directly or indirectly accountable to people , however judiciary alone is not
transparent not giving accounts of its actions to people.
D . Judges enjoy 5 star pay & perks , making merry at the cost of peoples money , public exchequer , but are not
giving accounts of their actions to people , not transparent to the public eye. They are not even honouring RTI
applications seeking information about actions of judges , because corrupt judges will be caught red handed.
E . Judges are not super humans nor super brains nor from moon or mars , they are ordinary mortals from the society
around us and just like us capable of doing good work as well falling prey to human lures like bribe , corruption ,
favoritism , etc.
F. Judges think they are sole custodians of constitution of india , in fact every citizen of india is a custodian of
constitution of india.
G . Collegium of judges is nothing but a coterie , a MAFIA proof - unfit corrupt persons like dinakaran ,
another judge involved in mysore roost resort sex scandal being selected by SCI collegium promoted
to the apex court. It is just the tip of iceberg , behind the judicial veil of secrecy many corrupt judges
are hiding. Hereby , I challenge Honourable supreme court of india that subject to conditions I will
bring to book corrupt judges who are hiding behind the veil. Are you ready ?
H . When compared to some corrupt judges who are nothing but criminals , a drain , parasites on our public exchequer
, society , the child workers who are hard working earning less than rupees 32 a day are far better , great human
beings.
I . Ofcourse when the court identifies that intentions of an act of parliament as unconstitutional , it has the right to
strike it down to uphold the supremacy of constitution. NJAC Act passed by parliament was in fact filling a legal
vaccum about accountability & selection of judges and in turn strengthening the constitution of india. But by striking
down NJAC Act of government of india , supreme court of india is weakening constitution of india , making contempt of
parliament , constitution & all Indian citizens. If at all supreme court was really sincere it could have suggested
more alternatives for transparent , accountable judiciary with appropriate transparent provisions for guarding
judicial independence.
J . When government of india passed unconstitutional acts like land acquisition bill , special status to Kashmir ,
against uniform civil code promoted unequal differing civil laws for various religion people and Bhopal gas victims act
, nuclear energy act , etc , did it not dawn on supreme court of india that it is the sole custodian of constitution ? then
why not SCI strike down those unconstitutional parliamentary acts ?
K . It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights of every Indian
citizens . Since 25 years I am appealing to SCI about issues concerning public welfare , national
security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights , human rights are repeatedly
violated but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these
appeals for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made , physically
assaulted , livelihood / jobs were denied , news publication closed , press accreditation denied ,
received threatening calls , blank calls, even to date rough elements follow us , rough elements scout
near home at mid night. Does not these indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI Judges ?
L . Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing unavailability. If at all
information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI ,
Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High Courts , etc.
M . Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including judges. If not on
what basis they give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give infor mation
about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking that person to share infor mation ?
N . If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of
rupees for investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements
running into tens of pages sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge
themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only
cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judges MAFIA at play ?
O . The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime.
With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes
by covering up judges & their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower
middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame
to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us still not do
their constitutional duties properly.
P . When a Judge Himself
Commits
Crime , When a POLICE Himself robs , Murders .
The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a
student makes a mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all
his students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police
himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a
crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved.
just think , if a judge himself that too apex court of the land itself commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional
rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties ,
what happens ?
it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to commit more crimes. that is
exactly what is happening in india. the educated public must raise to the occasion & peacefully , democratically must
oppose this criminalization of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S
DREAM.
I have shown in the following attachment how justice is bought , purchased , manipulated in INDIA with actual
cases. Just see the recent examples of supreme court judges involved in sexual assault case & ROOST Resort
Mysore Sex scandal involving judges , if any ordinary fellow had committed the same crimes he would have been
hauled over the coal fire. Just take another recent example of Prisoner Movie actor sanjay dutt , TADA provisions
were diluted by the judge to favour him and now he is getting parole week after week while the ordinary convicts
never get a single parole throught their sentence. What Brilliant Judges , what brilliant police sirji.
Are Judges above Law & can go scot free ? Can judges cheat , rape , swindle others and go scot free without legal
prosecution ? Why guilty CJIs were not legally prosecuted in a fair & transparent manner ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty. Transparency , accountability in selection
& functioning of Judges.
4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES
& FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted
respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM
SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON
ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN
RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR
TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW
INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ
DETAILS AT :
Half of former CJIs Corrupt :

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/half-of-former-cjis-corrupt ,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,
RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
Why NOT 3rd degree Torture of Corrupt Doctors , Police & Judges
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.in/2015/10/why-not-3rd-degree-torture-of-doctors.html#links ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/3rd-degree-torture-by-doctors-police ,
Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi to answer the
following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally
apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human beings , some of them
have even became judges through devious means other than merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing
salary & perks from public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.
We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel & martyrs for all the sacrifices made by them. Let us build a
strong , Secular , Democratic India by getting rid off few corrupt elements , anti nationals , traitors among public
servants , among judiciary & among police who are greater threat to Indias unity & integrity than Pakistani terrorists
or chinese military.
Information input forms part of process of ones expression. Ones expression in any forms written , oral , etc
becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information & Expression are
inseparable parts & form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right
as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a persons right to expression is violated , his other rights to
equality , justice , etc also are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.
In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants are functioning. However till date public
servants are hiding behind the veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created by british to suppress
native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement , failures ,
etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming
that CJI is under RTI purview & bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.
Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India , DG & IGP of GOK and others were not
honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned
websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian citizens ,
due to wrong / illegal work practices of Indian judges , police & public servants . The information we sought would
expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals in public service. The information we are seeking are no defense
secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &
strengthens our national security , national unity & integrity.
Hereby , i do request the honourable supreme court of india , for a Supreme Court monitored CBI Enquiry into this
whole issue as karnataka police are helpless , they don't have legal powers to prosecute high & mighty , constitutional
functionaries. They have not even enquired the guilty VVIPs even once however Under pressure from higher-ups they
repeatedly called me the complainant to police station took statements from me all for closing the files.
questions.
DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none of them were admitted ,
sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see how careless our judges are towards anti national crimes
, crimes worth crores of rupees.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the
Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.
PRAYER:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to
questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to make public all the proceedings of supreme court
collegiums and correspondence between SCI , Presidents office & government of india regarding selection of judges.
To make public all the eligibility criteria followed for selection of judges and who filled what criteria , who didnt fill
which criteria and the final ranking.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india and to protect the
constitutional rights of all Indian citizens including mine.
(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india , to protect the
constitutional rights , human rights of all Indian citizens including mine and to enable , facilitate all Indian
citizens to perform their Fundamental Duties as per constitution.
(v) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case.
Read : https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---writ-of-mandamus-1 ,
Date : 29th October 2015Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

Place : Mysuru IndiaPetitioner in person
2.
PIL Why NOT 3rd degree Torture , Death Sentence to Corrupt Judges , Police & Doctors

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India & Others
....Respondents
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE
OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF
INDIA.
To ,

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of
straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston
made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the
forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants , corrupt
judges , corrupt police & corrupt doctors.
2. some unfit people based on their connections , money power , etc everything else other than MERIT , HONESTY ,
INTEGRITY have become Judges , Police & Doctors. These unfit people have used criminal means for their selection
and indulge in crimes by selling their official duties for a price. Recent example : Delhi Judge Selection Examination ,
KPSC & VYAPAM scams.
3. These unfit judges declare rich criminals as innocents & send innocents to jail for a price. These unfit police leave
criminals , file B report to close cases , change charge sheet , change path of investigation / prosecution , fit innocents
in cases using 3rd degree torture methods , does contract / supari killing in the name of encounters , etc all for a price.
These corrupt doctors give false post mortem reports , misguiding medico legal opinions and illegally advice police
how to torture a human being without leaving any evidences.
4. Honest few in judiciary , police , health services & public services are just mute spectators , they are not raising
their voice , not legally prosecuting their corrupt colleagues. It also amounts to corroboration & a crime.
5 . Due to these type of match fixing by Judges & police many innocents are serving jail sentence behind bars & some
have been hanged , while the rich crooks are roaming free.
Are doctors , police & Judges above law ? Can Doctors , Judges & Police Commit crimes , go scot free ? Can Judges &
Police intentionally neglect ( to aid criminals ) their duties , while shamelessly drawing tens of thousands of rupees
monthly salary & perks on time without fail from public exchequer.
Is it not the duty of doctor to heal the pain of a human being rather than give pain to a human being ? is a doctor
legally authorized to torture or aid torture of a human being ?
Is it not the duty of police to uphold our law , protect public , common man rather than illegally fixing them in
cases ? are police legally authorized to subject a human being to torture ? Are not police responsible for life , health
& safety of persons under their custody ?
Is it not the duty of a judge to uphold law , protect public ? is it not his duty to check the veracity of claims , reports by
police , doctors giving fake evidences , reports ? is it not duty of a judge to protect life , health & safety of persons
under judicial custody or serving prison sentence based on judicial orders ?
3. Grounds:
All Indian citizens are guaranteed with fundamental rights of life , liberty , health , safety , equitable justice under
All Indian citizens are guaranteed with human rights of life , liberty , health , safety , equitable justice under
constitution of india as india is also a signatory of UN Human Rights Charter.
All Human Beings are guaranteed with human rights of life , liberty , health , safety , equitable justice by virtue
of their birth itself irrespective of any constitutional bodies or statutory bodies.
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of corrupt public servants , corrupt doctors , corrupt judges , corrupt police.
Request for supreme court orders to doctors , judges & police to perform their duties properly.
4. Averment:
questions.
PRAYER:
questions.
the case.
c. to constitute impartial statutory investigation committee comprising NGOs , press , police & judiciary at taluk
levels to investigate cases of 3rd degree torture by law enforcement agencies . Essentially these committees must
include a member from victims side during investigation & prosecution. The state government must bear the cost of
its functioning including transportation , food , remuneration at actual rate.
d. In the cases of 3rd degree torture , fake encounters , there must be provision for 2nd , 3rd medical examination ,
medical opinion by doctors appointed by investigation committee.
e. when government doctors are caught giving false post mortem reports , false medical opinions they must be
dismissed from service and legally prosecuted for abetting torture , attempt to murder or murder as the case may
be.
f. when police , jail staff or law enforcing personnel are caught for physically & mentally torturing a human being ,
an under trial or convict they must be dismissed from service and legally prosecuted for abetting torture , attempt
to murder or murder as the case may be.
g. when a judge is caught for giving biased judicial order without examining the veracity of evidences , statements ,
reports given by police , law enforcement personnel , doctors , when a judge bases his judicial orders on forced
confessions taken from under trials , convicts by 3rd degree torture methods , those judges must be dismissed from
service and legally prosecuted for abetting torture , attempt to murder or murder as the case may be.
h. when a judge fails to protect life , health , safety of a prisoner , whether under trial or convict , those judges must
be dismissed from service and legally prosecuted for abetting torture , attempt to murder or murder as the case may
be.
I . as 3rd degree torture , fake encounters are pre meditated , cold blooded murders , heinous crimes , they are rarest of
rare cases and judges , police , law enforcement officials , doctors abetting , executing 3rddegree torture , fake
encounters must be hanged till death. They are worse than KASAB.
j. the state government must give government job to one from victims family and must pay compensation at
actual living cost levels to that family .
k. the government must recover that compensation cost from salary , pension , properties of guilty judges , police ,
etc as land arrears.
l. to legally prosecute under murder charges STF police , forest officials who were responsible for 3rd degree torture ,
encounter deaths of tribals in MM Hills , Karnataka during operation nab veerappan.
m. to legally prosecute under murder charges judges who failed to protect the lives of under trials , convicts in
operation nab veerappan.
n. to legally prosecute under murder charges government doctors who gave false post mortem reports , false
medical opinions about fake encounters , 3rd degree torture of tribals in operation nab veerappan.
o . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case.
Dated : 10th December 2015 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India.PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
3.
PIL Before Supreme Court of USA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF USA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State , India and Global American Citizens
.....Petitioners
Versus
H.E.Honourable President of USA & Others

....Respondents
Petition under BILL OF RIGHTS and Human Rights Charter
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of USA and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the United States of America


a. Inequality in society , unjust laws , unjust enforcement of law is a breeding ground for frustrated youths ,
criminal elements , naxalites , terrorists. Vested foreign & domestic interests manipulate these inequalities in
society to advance their vested selfish interests using these frustrated , disillusioned youths as pawns in their
power game.
b. Police & other law enforcement agencies use 3rd degree torture against people suspected of petty crimes ,
whereas they dont use 3rd degree torture against their own corrupt colleagues , Judges who aid underworld
dons , big criminals earning bribe money to the tune of Millions of dollars. In many cases of Police corruption ,
judicial corruption even legal prosecution is not at all done.
c. Whole MUSLIM community is painted as a terror & suspected world over. They dont easily get jobs , rented
houses , loans , etc everybody suspects them. If you go by numbers there are many Christian terrorists in
spain , Nicaragua , cuba , Ireland , etc and most importantly masterminds of terrorism , people who sowed the
seeds of terrorism in Middle East , Asia , else where are all CHRISTIANS. Does that mean all Christians are
terrorists. True most of the terrorists come from muslim community , however there are also common folk like
us in the muslim community who yearn for a honest , simple living. There are good people in all communities
as there are bad people.
d. Crime is a crime , whether big or small. There is discrimination in cell allotment , labour hours , provision of
food , visitors facility between ordinary accused & rich accused persons , ordinary criminals and rich criminals
within jail.
e. The police & Presiding Judge in the case are responsible for health , safety of persons both in their custody
as well as safety of witnesses outside. Many persons are subjected to 3rd degree torture while in custody ,
some people have died in lock up and witnesses were threatened , murdered outside , but the respective
police , judges are not legally prosecuted for murder charges.
f. The suspects who were acquitted of charges under anti terror laws & other criminal charges , who went
through hell , whose family suffered , are not paid any compensation for wrongful detention by courts of law
nor the police who were responsible for wrong detention are legally prosecuted for leveling false charges.
g. US Presidents and US government in league with US based MNCs successively poked its nose in the affairs
of other sovereign nations , created rift in the peaceful countries , sowed the seeds of terrorism , aided &
supported terrorists in all respects. US is a heartless butcher , but now preaching non violence , peace to the
world.
h. US government always practices double standards take for instance industrial accident done by BP oil off
US coast , US Government extracted compensation to the maximum extent. Where as US based MNC Union
carbide (now DOW Chemicals) did man slaughter in india at Bhopal , still US government is not ordering the
guilty company to pay compensation.
i. USA which is a hugely industrialized nation with population enjoying opulent life style has caused more
damage to the environment resulting in climate change. As the worst destroyer of ecology , US government is
bound is bound to pay more for the repair of environment. However US government is forcing other backward
countries to share its own burden.
Are Presidents of United States of America above Law ? Are US police , judges , other public servants above
law ?
What Legal Rights Presiden of USA , US Military , US Police & US Judges have to successively violate the
human rights of citizens of other countries both within USA & outside.
how much US resources were spent from US TREASURY , to finance terrorist outfits , military juntas in other
sovereign nations ?
is not Al-queda , Taliban creations of USA ?
did September 9 / 11 WTC attack truly happened by hijacked airplane or was it planned by US authorities ?
see
http://www.neiu.edu/~ayjamess/hmmm.htm#Main
is racial profiling , profiling a particular community & suspecting all the muslims as terror suspects , right?
if it is right , the creators of such terrorist outfits past presidents of USA who were Christians makes it
logical to assume whole of our Christian community as terror suspect ?
is not use of 3rd degree torture on all type of suspects in US prisons & in the prisons of US allied countries at
the behest of US authorities , right ? is it not violation of human rights & US laws ?
did US find any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq , which was the main reason for US attacking Iraq ?
why not US authorities use scientific interrogation techniques like polygraph , lie detector tests instead of
inhuman 3rd degree torture on terror suspects & suspects in other criminal cases ?
what legal right our President of USA have , to illegally spend billions of our dollars on inhuman , illegal acts of
terrorism , military coup , creation , aiding & abetting of terrorists , etc , in other sovereign nations ? while we
are suffering from loss of jobs ,loss of home due to natural calamities , etc ?
Inspite of repeated appeals for justice JUDGES of SUPREME COURT of USA are mum and not taking action
against terror presidents. Is it because they owe their elevation to the highest judicial post to the US president
or is it a survival act ?
Crux , Foundation of all religions is humanity , kindness & universal brotherhood. It is the preachers who
misrepresent it. Terrorism created , aided , abetted by anybody is inhuman & wrong . Terrorism is creation of
power hungry , selfish people & they must be legally punished .
Hereby , we appeal to the honorable supreme court of USA to legally prosecute Previous PRESIDENTS OF USA
in the last 4 decades , for crimes of terror , as per the present US anti-terror laws.
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty of all American citizens as per
BILL of RIGHTS. Transparency , accountability in functioning of US President , US police & US Judiciary .
4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY US Presidents US JUDGES , US POLICE , US PUBLIC
SERVANTS responsible for TERROR Crimes committed in USA & Outside USA with support from US
government.
PRAYER:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of USA to consider this as a PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION
for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to
perform their duties & to answer the questions.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to uphold the constitution of USA and to protect
the constitutional rights of all American citizens.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to legally prosecute pas presidents of USA and
Incumbent President of Government of United States of America for Terror Crimes , torture of innocents in
Guantanamo , renditions , etc.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to initiate legal prosecution of police , law
enforcement officials , judges responsible for 3rd degree torture of innocents , lock-up deaths , fake
encounters and to pay compensation to victims and to recover money from personal properties of those guilty
police , judges.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to order the jail authorities to stop classification of
prisoners and to stop discrimination of prisoners.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to order police & presiding judge of a case to
ensure protection of life of accused , witnesses in the case , complainant of the case.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to order DOW Chemicals to pay full compensation
to victims of Bhopal Gas Tragedy in India and initiate criminal prosecution of responsible company
executives.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to order government of USA to pay towards the
damages it has done to the environment.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to order government of USA to spend tax payers
money on food safety , health care , joblessness of American citizens than on sponsoring terrorism in other
countries.
to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case.
Date : 31st January 2016Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

Place : Mysuru India Petitioner in person
4.
PIL - India , Pakistan , USA sponsoring TERRORISM
Double speak of Government
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
.....Petitioner
Versus
H.E.Honourable President of India & Others

....Respondents
OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF
To ,


Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them , due
to honest efforts of those few noble persons only , at least democracy is surviving in India.
A . "Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and
men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and
will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made
this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the
forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples
representatives , police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned police , judges fall among
the category of churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
B . As per the preamble of the constitution of India all the people , all Indian citizens are equal in every
respect , equally entitled to justice , equally responsible to uphold constitution . Only People , Citizens of India
are supreme No Judges , No Ministers , No Police , No Military , etc are supreme. Judges , ministers ,
president , Police , Military etc are all public servants constitutionally mandated to SERVE the public , NOT to
master over them. Even after 69 years of independence these police , judges , ministers have not come out of
colonial hangover instead become worse treating general public as their servants.
C. Inequality in society , unjust laws , unjust enforcement of law is a breeding ground for frustrated youths ,
criminal elements , naxalites , terrorists. Vested foreign & domestic interests manipulate these inequalities in
society to advance their vested selfish interests using these frustrated , disillusioned youths as pawns in their
power game.
D. I will list below various types of inequities existing in present day india even after nearly 69 years of
independence.
E. People of Jammu & Kashmir , North Eastern states of India are governed by different set of laws than the
rest of india.
F. There are different set of property laws , succession laws , marriage laws , etc for people of different
religions.
G. Judges committing crimes against women , indulging in corruption, etc can not be legally prosecuted &
punished.
H. Even after 69 years of independence , still dalits , tribal people are suffering & backward.
I. Police & other law enforcement agencies use 3rd degree torture against people suspected of petty crimes ,
whereas they dont use 3rd degree torture against their own corrupt colleagues , Judges who aid underworld
dons , big criminals earning bribe money to the tune of lakhs , crores of rupees. In many cases of Police
corruption , judicial corruption even legal prosecution is not at all done.
J. Whole MUSLIM community is painted as a terror & suspected world over. They dont easily get jobs , rented
houses , loans , etc everybody suspects them. True most of the terrorists come from muslim community ,
however there are also common folk like us in the muslim community who yearn for a honest , simple living.
There are good people in all communities as there are bad people.
K. Anti Terror Laws like TADA , AFSPA , etc are used with impunity without reasoning even on old people ,
children and whoever questions the police , military for their actions. Ideally these laws should cover those
aiding terrorists , anti nationals. However certain celebrities , police officials themselves who hobnob with
terrorists , underworld and aid their terror activities are not covered by these terror laws.
L. Constitution of India has not authorized , given powers to anybody to use 3rd degree torture against
suspects , it is illegal & inhuman. Police selectively use 3rd degree torture against suspects , innocents from
poor , ordinary back grounds to extract false confessions. Whereas they dont use 3rd degree torture against
real time , big time rich & influential criminals instead they get many facilities in the jail.
M. Crime is a crime , whether big or small. There is discrimination in cell allotment , labour hours , provision of
food , visitors facility between ordinary accused & rich accused persons , ordinary criminals and rich criminals
within jail.
N. The police & Presiding Judge in the case are responsible for health , safety of persons both in their custody
as well as safety of witnesses outside. Many persons are subjected to 3rd degree torture while in custody ,
some people have died in lock up and witnesses were threatened , murdered outside , but the respective
police , judges are not legally prosecuted for murder charges.
O. The suspects who were acquitted of charges under anti terror laws & other criminal charges , who went
through hell , whose family suffered , are not paid any compensation for wrongful detention by courts of law
nor the police who were responsible for wrong detention are legally prosecuted for leveling false charges.
P. Tribal people who are inhabitants of forest , who are living in harmony with ecology , protecting forests
since centuries are evicted by authorities in the name of protecting forests. Same authorities give vast tracts
of forest land on platter to big multinational corporations , who in turn destroy ecology , environment.
Q. Dalits , backward class people when construct small temporary hutments on government land , those
hutments are immediately razed down , dalits evicted by police , authorities. When rich crooks illegally
encroach vast tracts of government lands , lakes , canals , build huge townships , business complexes earning
crores of rupees , no action to raze down illegal buildings , evict encroachers is taken by police , authorities.
Sadly , government is in process of enacting laws to legalize those illegal structures belonging to rich crooks.
R. Government of india to fight the proxy war of cunning , coward external enemies is indulging in the same
cowardly tactics of aiding & abetting terrorism , by the way killing many innocent civilians. Instead GOI must
give a befitting military reply to enemy.
S. GOI is responsible for creation , funding , training of SALWA JUDUM , to counter naxalism in india. GOI is
responsible for creation , funding , training of counter terrorist out fits in north east india , jammu Kashmir ,
Pakistan and responsible for creation , funding , training of LTTE , Tamil terrorist outfits in srilanka. GOI poked
its nose in the internal affairs of east Pakistan which led to creation of separate nation Bangladesh. All these
led to loss of thousands of innocent lives , GOI didnt bother to compensate them.
T. In india , we have many unattended domestic problems , half of our population is barely sustaining on a
single piece meal a day. GOI instead of properly using the precious tax payers money to solve domestic
problems , squandering them on funding terror outfits. No legal prosecution of GOI Ministers responsible for
these terror acts taken till date.
U. Actions were taken with impunity against sikh terrorists but in the same way actions were not taken
against those responsible for sikh massacre in delhi , else where.
V. Actions were taken with impunity against terrorists responsible for burning of Sabarmati express train were
taken , but in the same way actions were not taken against those responsible for Godhra riots in Gujarath.
W. Actions were taken with impunity against terrorists responsible for Bombay bomb blasts were taken , but in
the same way actions were not taken against those responsible for Bombay riots afterwards.
X. Many industrialists are contributing money to criminals , but no action by GOI to stop it taken till date.
Y. Government of Pakistan , china are aiding terrorists , separatists , Maoists in india. Government of USA is
also indirectly aiding terrorists , separatists , Maoists in india through Pakistan.
Z. Whoever raises his voice against the illegalities of authorities are silenced in many ways by authorities. He
will be fitted in fake cases , his livelihood snatched away , courts with weird interpretations of law will punish
him , slap contempt charges on him sending him to jail. If he is spilling out more TRUTH he will be
neutralized , murdered by intelligence agencies with the aid of criminals. Many whistle blowers , RTI Activists ,
Journalists , Human Rights Activists , Crusaders have died mysteriously this way. No compensation to victims ,
no legal prosecution of authorities responsible for it till date.
Are all Indian citizens really equal ? Are police , judges , ministers above law ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty. Transparency , accountability in
functioning of police & Judiciary .
4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES , POLICE , PUBLIC SERVANTS responsible
for above mentioned injustices.
PRAYER:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their
duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to enforce uniform civil code for all Indian
citizens.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india and to
protect the constitutional rights of all Indian citizens including mine.
(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india , to protect
the constitutional rights , human rights of all Indian citizens including mine and to enable , facilitate all Indian
citizens to perform their Fundamental Duties as per constitution.
(v) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to annul legal immunity privileges given to
judges of india and make the judges accountable for all their actions.
(vi) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to annul Article 370 of our constitution giving
special status to jammu Kashmir state and also annul laws giving special status to north eastern states of
india.
(vii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to initiate legal prosecution of police , law
enforcement officials , judges responsible for 3rd degree torture of innocents , lock-up deaths , fake
encounters and to pay compensation to victims and to recover money from personal properties of those guilty
police , judges.
(viii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to order the jail authorities to stop
classification of prisoners and to stop discrimination of prisoners.
(ix) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to order police & presiding judge of a case to
ensure protection of life of accused , witnesses in the case , complainant of the case.
(x) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to order GOI & state governments to give
reservation , other facilities to dalits , backward class people in turn. Then facilities will be available to wide
section of dalits instead of a creamy , affluent dalit family repeatedly getting benefits for generations , while
hundreds of dalit families dont get benefit even once in their life time.
(xi) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to order GOI & state governments to protect
the forest rights of tribals over the forest they dwell in. To legally prosecute illegal encroachers of forest , rich
crooks.
(xii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to annul the land acts enacted by various
state governments which goes on to legalize illegal encroachment of government lands , lakes , canals , etc
by rich crooks. To legally prosecute the illegal encroachers , rich crooks.
(x) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute ministers , public
servants of GOI & state governments who aided, abetted terrorism , who created SALWA JUDUM , who aided
tamil terror outfits in srilanka , who created counter terror outfits in NEFA , J&K , Pakistan , who aided
Bangladeshi separatists. To pay compensation to victims of those terrorism and to recover money from
properties of guilty ministers , guilty public servants.
(xi) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to order GOI & state governments to take
impartial action against all the criminals responsible for terror acts , riots , bomb blasts irrespective of which
party they belong to or which community they belong to or if he is a celebrity or ordinary person.
(xii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to order GOI to give a befitting military reply
to enemies , crush the intruders , terrosists , naxalites but not to indulge in cowardly proxy war which kills
innocent civilians.
(xiii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to order GOI & state governments to pay
compensation to victims who were wrongly detained , jailed by police , authorities under anti terror laws ,
criminal laws. To recover money from properties , salary , pension of guilty police & judges.
(xiv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to order RBI , GOI & state governments to
rigorously monitor transactions of commercial firms , industries for black money transactions and to keep a
tab on auditors , company secretaries who aid those criminals. To make public details of guilty industrialists ,
to legally prosecute them and to recover money siphoned off from them.
(xv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to pass such other orders and further orders
as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case to remove inequalities
prevailing in our law , in law enforcement & in our society as mentioned above. By which, causes of origin for
naxalism , terrorism can be erased.
(xvi) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to declare Pakistan , china & USA as terror
states and order GOI to deal accordingly with those nations and to make an appeal to UNITED NATIONS ,
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE to take action against Pakistan , china & USA for their terror crimes in
india.
(xvii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the
Date : 23rd January 2016Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

Place : Mysuru India Petitioner in person
5.
PIL Mercy Death Plea to Honourable Chief Justice of India

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
....Respondents
OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF
INDIA.
To ,
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and
men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir
Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt
public servants.
2. As a result of fighting for public causes , public good I have individually sufferred numerous injustices and
still sufferring injustices. My newspaper publication was illegally closed down , my web news paper not given
with press accredition , my job oppurtunities in RBI Note press , PES Engineering college , NIE Engineering
college , Mysore district court , etc snatched away illegally , I was beaten up , attempts on my life were made
even after bringing threats to my life were brought to notice of supreme court of india. See how duty duty
conscious our supreme court judges are ? all these sufferrings for public causes I have raised & to silence me.
Are police & Judges above law ? Can Judges & Police Comitt crimes , go scot free ? Can Judges & Police
intentionally neglect ( to aid criminals ) their duties , while shamelessly drawing tens of thousands of rupees
monthly salary & perks on time without fail from public exchequer.
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of corrupt public servants , corrupt judges , corrupt police.
Request for supreme court orders to judges & police to perform their duties properly.
4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus
and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to
answer the questions.
Read the actual case details at following web pages involving judges & police in crimes. The criminal
network , corruption net work , MAFIA of Judges & Police is strong , whenever one of their members is
accussed , others white wash , bury the case in the name of investigation. Transparent , impartial
investigation as in the case of common man is not at all done.
We respect the honest few in judiciary , police & public service. Those honest few are also becoming parties
to crime by becoming silent , by not doing their duties , by not arresting their corrupt colleagues. Their by
they are covering up crime & aiding criminals to commit more crimes.
Due to these type of corrupt judges & corrupt police innocents, commoners land in jails and some are even
hanged for crimes not commited by them , while the rich crooks roam free.
The corrupt judges & corrupt police are shameless people , parasites in our society. They take tens of
thousands of rupees monthly salary & perks from our money , tax payers money and still dont do their
duties properly. The judges give sermons , judgements running into hundreds of pages when their own folk is
in the dock , caught for crimes they intentionally fall silent. The police use filthy language , use 3rd degree
torture against commoners , innocents when their own folk is in the dock , caught for crimes , dacoity they
dont use filthy language nor they use 3rd degree torture . Even in fit cases where alleged Judges & Police can
be given death sentence , they are spared , why ?
Please dont send police again to my home neither refer my case to police. They dont have practical powers
to inquire high & mighty judges. They will come to my home , call me to police station , will take a statement
from me & will close the file by sending it to head quarters. This has happened previously number of times. If
you are honest in intent , Please constitute an impartial , transparent empowered Inquiry committee to deal
this case.
The judges , police & public servants intentionally delay taking action in cases and withhold giving
information in time , so that evidences are buried in time , gets destroyed and time lapse occurs resulting in
the case becoming time barred. Some of PILs submitted by us are 20 years old concerning national security
and I was also eligible for free legal aid at the time of application - still the judges & police didnt take
appropriate action however they shamelessly took thousands of rupees salary , perks from our money. Till
date no justice in sight instead more injustices meted out to me as a result of this crusade. THESE INCAPABLE
JUDGES & POLICE ARE UNFIT FOR THE POSITIONS THEY OCCUPY , IF THEY CANNT PROVIDE JUSTICE ATLEAST
GIVE ME MERCY DEATH.
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge &
belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do
incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly
the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for
questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station for
questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police
or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job ,
meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional
police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal
nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint
is & will be effective.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied
proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my family
members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be
responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to
survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money
must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land
arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants &
Constitutional fuctionaries.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through email , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem
were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are
& see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless our
judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not
filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the
subject matter of the present petition.
PRAYER:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the
c. To legally prosecute the public servants who are responsible for not giving press accreditation to my web
news papers , myself as a journalist and responsible for closure of my news papers.
d. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RPG Cables Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under the
behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
e. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s PES College of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me
under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
f. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s National Institute of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me
g. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s Reserve Bank Note Nudran Pvt Ltd , who denied job opportunities to
me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
h. To legally prosecute authorities of Mysore District Courts & Bangalore District Courts , who denied job
opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
i. To legally prosecute persons responsible for attempts on my life.
j. to legally prosecute judges , police & CBI officials responsible for cover-up of late PM Rajiv Gandhi
assassination case.
K . To provide protection to life , liberty , livelihood , jobs of me , my family members & dependants.
l. To reopen , reinvestigate assassination case of Late PM Rajiv Gandhi.

m. To legally prosecute authorities of supreme court of india for not answering show cause notice issued to
them and order them to answer the show cause notice as well as RTI questions given to them by the
petitioner.
n. To conduct an impartial , transparent supreme court monitored enquiry into cases mentioned by me.
o. To admit all PILs filed by me in larger public interest.
p. To initiate criminal prosecution of public servants , police & judges who are trying to cover up crime and
criminals by denying me information , by not taking action on our appeals , PILs.
q. To award me a compensation of RUPEES TWO CRORES towards the losses I have sufferred and injustices I
am still going through for fighting for public causes.
r. To recover compensation amount as land arrears from guilty police , guilty judges & guilty public servants
individually.
s. To permit me to work in the investigation team , to assist them in investigation subject to conditions .
t . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the
u. THESE INCAPABLE JUDGES & POLICE ARE UNFIT FOR THE POSITIONS THEY OCCUPY , IF THEY
CANNT PROVIDE JUSTICE ATLEAST GIVE ME MERCY DEATH.
Dated : 16th September 2015 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India...PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
6..
PIL Justice to Human Rights Activist

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
....Respondents
To ,
forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
2. As a result of fighting for public causes , public good I have individually sufferred numerous injustices and still
sufferring injustices. My newspaper publication was illegally closed down , my web news paper not given with press
accredition , my job oppurtunities in RBI Note press , PES Engineering college , NIE Engineering college , Mysore
district court , etc snatched away illegally , I was beaten up , attempts on my life were made even after
bringing threats to my life were brought to notice of supreme court of india. See how duty duty conscious our supreme
court judges are ? all these sufferrings for public causes I have raised & to silence me.
Are police & Judges above law ? Can Judges & Police Comitt crimes , go scot free ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of corrupt public servants , corrupt judges , corrupt police.
4. Averment:
questions.
sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless our judges are towards anti national
crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted
by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.
PRAYER:
questions.
the case.
c. To legally prosecute the public servants who are responsible for not giving press accreditation to my web news
papers , myself as a journalist and responsible for closure of my news papers.
d. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RPG Cables Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of
criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
e. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s PES College of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me under the
f. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s National Institute of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me under
the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
g. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s Reserve Bank Note Mudran Pvt Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me
h. To legally prosecute authorities of Mysore District Courts & Bangalore District Courts , who denied job opportunities
to me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
j. to legally prosecute judges , police & CBI officials responsible for cover-up of late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination
case.
m. To legally prosecute authorities of supreme court of india for not answering show cause notice issued to them and
order them to answer the show cause notice as well as RTI questions given to them by the petitioner.
n. To conduct an impartial , transparent supreme court monitored enquiry into cases mentioned by me.
o. To admit all PILs filed by me in larger public interest.
p. To initiate criminal prosecution of public servants , police & judges who are trying to cover up crime and criminals by
denying me information , by not taking action on our appeals , PILs.
q. To award me a compensation of RUPEES TWO CRORES towards the losses I have sufferred and injustices I am still
going through for fighting for public causes.
r. To recover compensation amount as land arrears from guilty police , guilty judges & guilty public servants
individually.
s. To permit me to work in the investigation team , to assist them in investigation subject to conditions .
t . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case.
Dated : 23rd July 2015 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

7.
PIL Legal Prosecution of Government officials , Public Servants involved in Reliance
Scams
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
.....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Cabinet Secretary , PMO , Government of India & Others

....Respondents
IN THE NATURE OF
To ,


B . Loot of natural resources , telecom spectrum & public property in India and illegal aid to those criminals by
government officials.
Are government officials , telecom , petroleum , finance department officials , police & revenue officials who aided
loot , above Law & can go scot free ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , legal prosecution & punishment of guilty government officials and public servants .
4. Averment:
Give what action has been taken by government of india or state governments or other statutory bodies against
reliance industries for its irregularities in telecom , oil sector , etc.
PRAYER:
questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to legally prosecute guilty officials mentioned in the
above said report.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india , to protect natural
resources and to protect the constitutional rights of all Indian citizens including mine.
(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to immediately keep all government officials
mentioned in the above said report under suspension from service & to take necessary steps to protect all type of
evidences.
the case.
Date : 28th November 2015Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

Place : Mysuru India..Petitioner in person
8.
PIL Legal Prosecution of officials involved in Bellary Mining Scam
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
.....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others

....Respondents
IN THE NATURE OF
To ,


B . Loot of natural resources in Karnataka state and illegal aid to those criminals by government officials. Read
Karnataka Lokayukta Mining scam report .
Are forest officials , police & revenue officials who aided bellary mining loot , above Law & can go scot free ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , legal prosecution & punishment of guilty police , revenue , forest officials.
4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS MENTIONED IN THE KARNATAKA
LOKAYUKTA REPORT submitted by Justice Santosh Hegde & Shri.U.V.Singh ABOUT BELLARY MINING SCAM. IF NOT WHY
? REASONS THEROF.
How many guilty government officials mentioned in the above report got promotions , continuing in service making it
easy for them to tamper evidences ?
What action against public servants , officials who are hushing up the case & protecting the guilty ?
PRAYER:
questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to legally prosecute guilty officials mentioned in the
above said report.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india , to protect natural
resources and to protect the constitutional rights of all Indian citizens including mine.
(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to immediately keep all government officials
mentioned in the above said report under suspension from service & to take necessary steps to protect all type of
evidences.
the case.

9.
PIL - Bhopal Gas Leak
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
.....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Seceretary , Government of Madhya Pradesh & Others
....Respondents
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 21 , ARTICLE 14 16 , ARTICLE 21 , seeking Justice , compensation and for issuance of
WRIT of MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
C . Union carbide plant ( UCIL ) was unsafe and indulged in unsafe work practices , maintenance was inadequate.
D . Even a local journalist through a news publication publicly brought to notice of authorities concerned perils of
Bhopal gas plant , years before the Bhopal gas leak , industrial accident occurred . He forewarned.
E . Inspite of forewarning Madhya Pradesh Industries , Factories Inspectorate departments failed to take adequate
steps , allowed the UCIL plant to run uninterrupted.
F . Inspite of forwarning Madhya Pradesh state pollution control board failed to take adequate steps , allowed the
UCIL plant to run uninterrupted.
G . Madhya Pradesh state government side by side with UCIL management is equally responsible for the Bhopal gas
leak case. It failed to do its statutory duties and to prevent disaster in time.
H . Even after the disaster took place , Madhya Pradesh state government and Government of India instead of
legally prosecuting Mr.Warren Anderson ( Head of UCIL) who was in custody , illegally , brazenly helped him to run
away from law.
I . Even after the disaster took place , Madhya Pradesh state government failed to legally arrest and prosecute union
carbide top executives.
J . Union Carbide USA head quarters wanted lucrative Indian market , cheap Indian resources , cheap Indian labor , lax
Indian laws but didnt have the decency to respect Indian laws.
K . Government of India , Government of Madhya Pradesh failed to seek extradition of Mr. Warren Anderson and other
top Union Carbide executives from USA. They failed to get right cost & compensation from US Corporate giant & US
government.
L . The government of USA and Supreme Court of USA is practicing double standards , just see the example of BP oil
spillage in USA territory by a UK based corporate giant. The government of USA & Supreme Court of USA extracted
huge cost & compensation from UK based British Petroleum , for American citizens suffering due to the oil spillage.
The arrogant Government of USA & Supreme Court of USA shamelessly perceives lives of Americans precious and
others as cheap. Our spineless Indian government , supreme court of india bows , kow tows before them.
M . The government of India & Government of Madhya Pradesh who are themselves culprits alongwith UCIL to cover
up their own crimes , to favor US multinational enacted a new law curtailing the legal rights of Bhopal gas victims ,
Indian citizens.
N . Shamelessly Supreme Court of India , went a step further Then Chief Justice of India Justice Ahmadi & his bench
colleagues diluted the penal charges of prosecution.
O . Till date neither Union Carbide nor DOW who took over the management of Union Carbide has paid right cost &
compensation nor they have cared about the clean up of Bhopal gas disaster site till date even after decades.
P . When Government of USA & Supreme Court of USA does not respect Indian Laws , Indian citizens why should
American Citizens , American Corporations , American Interests in Indian territory should be protected ?
Are Multi national Corporations & its top executives above law ? Is the acts of our ministers , judges in aiding a
criminal , fugitive to run away from law just , legal ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , legal prosecution of guilty under ARTICLE 21 , ARTICLE 14 16 , ARTICLE 21 ,
seeking Justice , compensation and for issuance of WRIT of MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
4. Averment:
Give what action has been taken against culprits involved in Bhopal gas leak case till date.
PRAYER:
questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute Madhya Pradesh state
government industry department , factories safety & Inspectorate department and MP Pollution Control Board
officials for criminal negligence of duties.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute the MP state government &
Indian government ministers and officials who helped fugitive Mr. Warren Anderson to run away from Indian law.
(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute the MP state government &
Indian government ministers and officials who failed to seek extradition of Mr. Anderson and other UC top executives
from USA.
(v) ) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute the MP state government &
Indian government ministers and officials who failed to extract appropriate compensation , costs from Union Carbide
or from DOW or from counter guarantor Government of USA till date.
(vi) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to declare void , annul the Bhopal Gas Victims Act
and related enactments , government orders passed by both Government of India and Government of Madhya
Pradesh which curtails the constitutional rights of Bhopal gas leak victims.
(vii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute former chief justice of india Mr.
Ahmadi & his bench colleagues who diluted the prosecution charges against union carbide and its top executives.
(viii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to order DOW Chemicals to pay the appropriate
cost & compensation towards Bhopal gas leak disaster.
(ix) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to order Government of USA , Supreme Court of
USA to respect Indian Law if they want reciprocal respect. To order government of USA & Supreme Court of USA to
extradite former top executives of Union Carbide to India , to ensure appropriate payment of cost , compensation in
the said case as government of USA happens to be a counter guarantor.
(x) To declare President of USA & Chief Justice of USA as criminals for their double standards , for aiding
perpetrators of man slaughter at Bhopal .
(xI) To order for CBI investigation into assets of Mr.Ahmadi , ministers , government officials who helped union
carbide & its executives.

Place : Mysuru India..Petitioner in person
10.
PIL Land Mafia and Judges

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
....Respondents
To ,
2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to government of karnataka authorities , MUDA , BDA , KIADB , MCC ,
BBMNP , etc seeking information regarding illegal buildings , land encroachments specifically in mysore & bangalore ,
they didnt provide me information. Now one land scam after another are tumbling out.
3. I have given certain details to authorities including judiciary , SCI regarding land , lake encroachments in mysore
when encroachment was at preliminary stage. The authories cold have stopped it , but they didn,t. Now , the hinkal
lake , hebbal lake , hootagalli lake & BEML Quarters lake have been encroached to maximum extent and criminals
have made crores of rupees profit.
4. Government authorities has not given title deeds to tribals living in forest since centuries , government authorities
has not given title deeds to landless people , dalits who are cultivating on government land since decades.
5. Government authorities , police immediately evict , take suo motto action when a poor family , nomadic family just
erects a hutment on government land. The same public servants , police dont take action when a rich crook palatial
bungalow , business complex on government land , lake bed. Cannt they see it. , they can but are hands in glove with
looters.
6. even some of the judges dont take action when appeal for justice is made to them , to evict encroachers , to stop
encroachment. It may be quid pro quo arrangement with crooks. See how many judges have benefitted from
government discretionery quota allotment of sites , illegal judicial layout , etc.
7. The land encroachers are not poor people below poverty line , they dont even have ability to build a pucca house.
Encroachers are rich crooks , greedy individuals with political connection. So they dont deserve compassion.
8. Now , government of karnataka is trying to legalise illegalities in buildings , land encroachments , which gives a
booster dose to criminals to commit more crimes.
9. As per equitable law if present land encroachments are legalized , in future too government must legalize future
land encroachments when ever it takes place.
10. Prior to enactment of AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME of government of karnataka legalizing illegal constructions , land
encroachments, MUDA , BDA , MCC , KIADB officials evicted , demolished buildings of encroachers who didnt cough
up bribes. The one who paid bribes , their encroachments , illegal buildings survived and now getting legalized by
government.
11. Now , as per equity who ever have been evicted from encroachments , whos illegal buildings demolished must
get compensation from government. If not all encroachers must be evicted & illegal buildings must be demolished.
Is robbing anothers property right , legal ? is robbing land , lake a public property for private , individual use right ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of land grabbing ,frauds.
4. Averment:
Covering up Land Frauds & Land Mafia . Please read details at :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-first-appeal---muda-bda-kiadb ,
questions.
PRAYER:
issue instructions to the concerned public servants , Government of Karnataka authorities in the following cases to
perform their duties & to answer the questions.
the case.
Kindly read full details at following web page :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-first-appeal---muda-bda-kiadb ,

11.
PIL Death Penalty

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R

.
....Petitioner
Versus
....Respondents
To ,
We have utmost heartfelt respects to honest few in judiciary , police & public service. We SALUTE them. Our effort
here is to bring errant judges , police & public servants to book.
Democracy is relatively best form of governance, compared to monarchy , communism , dictatorship. The founding
pillar of democracy is honesty & integrity of public servants. When criminals become public servants , indulges in
corrupt , criminal practices democracy fails. Such corrupt public servants , corrupt judges , corrupt police are inside
enemies , traitors and cause more damage to national security than terrorists , naxalites or enemy armies. Which
court dares to hang such corrupt judges , corrupt police ?
A.
Terrorism is an inhuman act ,terrorists are inhumans , beasts , dont deserve humane treatment. Those
causing terror , aiding , abetting terror dont deserve humane treatment. One among those
terrorists yakub memmon responsible for Bombay bomb blast rightly deserved death sentence.
B.
Dhananjay chatterjee killed an innocent little girl. He too rightly deserved death
sentence.
Law Regarding death sentence is right , problem lies in its interpretation & enforcement . some of our corrupt
judges , corrupt police , public servants have biased view. In india , legal system can be manipulated , evidences
concocted , witnesses coerced , false confessions taken under third degree torture methods , judgement / match
fixing is done. Read full details with actual cases A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
There is every possibility of innocent persons belonging to weaker , vulnerable sections of society , who cannt
defend themselves getting irreversible death sentence. Even if a death sentence is proved to be wrong
afterwards , judges cannt bring them back to life. Judges are NOT Gods. That is why , Judges please
dont play GOD. Please go through following actual cases fit for death sentences , but with biased view &
under the patronage of powers that be escaped gallows.
Why death sentence to few , while not for others even though they deserve it ? Why there is a bias in awarding
death sentence ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for right , unbiased prosecution , equitable justice for all.
4. Averment:
A. What action against dawood Ibrahim & tiger memmon ? what action against ministers , police , film
personalities who have ties with dawood & attended parties hosted by dawood @ gulf ? why no action against
them ? why no action against persons storing arms , ammunition for Bombay blasts ? why tada charges were
diluted for some influential criminals ? biased law enforcement.
B. Why not death sentence to those responsible for burning Sabarmati express train passengers ? biased law
enforcement.
C.
Why not death sentence for those master minds & tools responsible for godhra riots ? why not
gujarath state government appealed to higher court seeking death sentence to perpetrators of godhra riots ?
biased law enforcement.
D.
Why not death sentence to those responsible for murdering RTI activists , whistle blowers ? biased law
enforcement.
E.
Why not death sentence to those responsible for murdering whistle blowers satyendra dubey & IOCL
Manjunath ? biased law enforcement.
F.
Why not death sentence to those responsible for Bombay riots prior to Bombay bomb blasts ? in some
cases state government , prosecution even withdrew cases against rioters , filed B reports closing the cases, in
some cases prosecution failed to properly present witnesses , evidences before court and in some cases failed to
appeal to higher courts. biased law enforcement.
G.
Why not death sentence to those responsible for sikh massacre in delhi after assassination of PM Indira
Gandhi ? in some cases state government , prosecution even withdrew cases against rioters , filed B reports
closing the cases , in some cases prosecution failed to properly present witnesses , evidences before court and in
some cases failed to appeal to higher courts.. biased law enforcement.
H.
Why not death sentence to both master minds & tools of late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? biased
law enforcement.
I.
Why not death sentence to STF police personnel who ran a place called workshop in MM Hills ,
Karnataka. STF Police personnel during operation to nab forest brigand veerappan applied very cruel, inhuman
3rd degree torture methods on tribals , innocents to extract false confessions at this place called workshop. Some
innocents died unable to bear the torture by police. This cruel act was proved before statutorily constituted
human rights commission judge , still no death sentence to STF Police personnel , why ? biased law enforcement.
J.
Why not death sentence to police officials responsible for cold blooded murders , fake encounters , lock
up deaths , third degree torture of innocents ? biased law enforcement. Refer TORTURE CHAMBERS OF INDA
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/third-degree-torture-of-chief-justice-of-india-karnataka-dgpunion-home-secretary , https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/torture-chambers-of-india
K.
Why not government pay compensation to civilian victims of terrorist acts , riots ? why dont
government pay appropriate respect , recognition , compensation to police , security , military personnel who
lay down their lives in the line of duty guarding our motherland & our brethren ?
L.
Why lenient punishment to approvers in some cases , but not to yakub memmon ? Yakub memmon
helped prosecution in gathering evidences regarding Bombay bomb blast case , still no leniency by court , why ?
biased law enforcement.
M.
Why no action against corrupt , criminal judges & police who doesnt do their duties , who doesnt give
information under RTI , who doesnt admit , hear PIL appeals thereby protecting the crimianls ? biased law
enforcement. Read NOTICE TO CJI http://www.scribd.com/doc/273722960/Wake-up-Chief-Justice-ofIndia , https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/pil---notice-to-cji
N.
Universal Law , Indian law proclaims terrorism , aiding & abetting terrorism a crime. Why does the Indian
government agencies aids & abets counter terrorist groups in jammu Kashmir , north east states of india ? why
state government & Indian government supports , aids SALWA JUDUM a counter terrorist , anti naxalite
outfit which is jointly responsible for terrorism in chattisgarh state ? why tamilnadu state government & Indian
government aided tamil terrorists in srilanka ? why Indian government is aiding terror outfits in afghanistan &
Pakistan ? why indian government supported terrorists in east Pakistan , ultimately creating Pakistan ? all these
dastardly , cruel acts of indian government has resulted in bloodshed , still resulting in loss of numerous innocent
lives. Why dont Indian government mind its own business ? india has enough domestic problems to solve , why
dont the government use tax payers money to solve domestic problems instead of interfering in others
affairs resulting in bloodshed ? why NOT Death Sentence to prime minister of india & president of india at those
times responsible for authorizing aid to terrorists ? biased law enforcement.
O.
Late Mr.Warren Anderson was in control of Bhopal United Carbide plant , through internal safety checks
& 3rd party audits he was privy to glaring safety lapses on part of union carbide management. Still he chose to
keep mum , which resulted in Bhopal gas tragedy killing thousands of innocents , maiming lakhs of human
beings & still even new born babies in the locality are contracting ailments. Courtesy Mr.Anderson. Such a
butcher Anderson was arrested by local police under man slaughter charges , produced before court.
However ministers , government officials of both state & central governments without orders , permission from
the court illegally got him out of jail arranged a special car , special aeroplane for the culprit to escape from
law. Years afterwards , a CJI of supreme court of india diluted the man slaughter charges against Mr.Anderson.
Why no death sentence to Anderson responsible for death & sufferings of lakhs of people ? why no deth
sentence to chief minister , minister , police , officials who helped Anderson escape from Indian law ? why no
death sentence to CJI who diluted charges against Anderson ? biased law enforcement.
In the backdrop of above cases , the fact is our legal system is imperfect , error prone. Therefore , it must
become professional , perfect in its duty first , to punish all the wrong doers. Till , such a time death penalty
must be kept on hold or abolished. If it cannt , at the least it can give choice of death to convicts like death
by sleeping pill or injection or gun shot , etc instead of medieval hanging.
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus
and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to

The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through email , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem
were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are
& see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , common men & see how careless our
judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not
filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the
PRAYER:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the
c . to abolish death penalty or to give choice of death to convicts.
d . To legally prosecute authorities of supreme court of india for not answering show cause notice issued to them and
Dated : 8th August 2015 ..FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
12.
PIL Stop Robberies @ RBI by bank staff

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Governor , Reserve Bank of India (RBI) & Others
....Respondents
To ,
2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to RBI authorities since years seeking justice regarding illegalities ,
irregularities in recruitment , currency handling , currency theft , etc @ RBI , they didnt provide justice at all.
3. For a common man it is a herculean task to get Rs.5000 loan from a bank , but rich & connected get lakhs , crores
of rupees loan quite easily from banks , how ?
4. When a common man , farmer defaults to pay loan of few thousands of rupees bank immediately dispatches loan
recovery agents / Rowdies , seizes his property & auctions and recover their dues to last penny. Farmers are
committing suicide unable to pay loans to escape from ignominy .
5. Huge companies get crores of rupees loan from banks eventhough basically the project report itself is at fault , not
viable. Siphons off company resources by insider trading to their sister concerns although bank representatives are
very much their on the board of companies.
6 . Such companies default on loan dues to bank , but no recovery agents / rowdies are sent by banks. Finally the
company becomes bust.
7. Bank looses money , the company is declared as NON PERFORMING ASSET and government + bank waives off
interest or else loan itself.
8. End looser the public whose money went down the drain , profiteers company promoters , executives and bank
manager. No recovery from their personal , family properties why ?
Is it right for banks , government to let out fraudsters without criminal prosecution ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of financial frauds.
4. Averment:
Covering up Financial Frauds. Please read details at :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rbi---robberer-s-bureau-of-india ,
https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/rbi-robberers-bureau-of-india/ ,
questions.
PRAYER:
issue instructions to the concerned public servants , RBI authorities in the following cases to perform their duties & to
the case.
c. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RBI & M/s BRBNMPL , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of

13. PIL Late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
....Respondents
To ,
2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed years ago to union home ministry & supreme court of india , to permit me
to appear before Honourable Jain commission of Enquiry probing late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case as well as
before honourable Supreme Court of India as an amicus curie to shed light on case , parallel investigation needed , I
was not permitted.
3. Now , the Investigating Officer ( IO ) who probed the case himself is crying foul.
4. This amounts to cover-up of crimes & shielding of master minds of Rajiv assassination case by supreme court of
india.
Who master minded the assassination of Late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi assassination. When there is no justice to
the family of former prime minister , what is the fate of commoners ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of assassination.
4. Averment:
Covering up Late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination conspiracy & BOFORS SCAM
The CBI & GOI is more interested in favoring accused persons , Quattrochi & closing BOFORS Case than punishing the
guilty.
The GOI & investigating authorities have failed to punish the real master minds behind the Late Prime minister Shri .
Rajiv Gandhi assassination case .
When a responsible Indian citizen volunteered to appear before the supreme court of india as an amicus curie , to give
certain information before the court relating to this assassination , he was not at all permitted. Instead he was
threatened , attempts made to murder him , his news paper was closed , his jobs were illegally snatched away , police
& investigating agencies repeatedly grilled him , THE PURPOSE IS TO SILENCE THAT PERSON . The Police failed to act
upon his complaints. The Supreme Court of India Failed to admit his PIL Petitions. ALL TO COVER UP THE POWERS THAT
BE .
who are covering-up late p.m. rajiv gandhi assassination case? who are those conspirators? who are trying to silence
me?
My sufferings began hand in hand with my crusade. I have raised various issues of social concern from time to time at
the appropriate levels, one of those is LATE P.M. RAJIV GANDHI ASASSINATION CASE. where-in only the tools of the
conspirators were punished where as the conspirators are roaming free. i have raised this topic of inequity , travesty
of justice and sought a fair, proper enquiry& trial , at various forums. but to no avail.
the conspirators were disturbed by this and tried to silence me by threatening me, physically assaulting me and even
made attempts to murder me. they prevented me from appearing before the JAIN COMMISSION OF ENQUIRY. they even
manipulated the recruitment systems to deny me the appointments in R.B.I.CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE, P.E.S.
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING MANDYA, N.I.E MYSORE , District Court Mysore & Illegally snatched away my job in RPG
Cables Ltd , Mysore . they even tried to silence me by forcibly closing down my newspaper publications THE TESTUDO
& VOICE OF CRUSADER.
my appeals for justice resulted only in police enquiries. the central intelligence bureau(I.B.) state intelligence & state
police personnel enquired me exhaustively number of times, but they never did enquire the powers that be. any way
these people dont have practical powers to enquire such people. the highest constitutional functionaries who can
order a proper enquiry, trial are keeping mum inspite of repeated appeals. probably they are acting under the
directions of conspirators. thereby they are not only covering up the crime, they are actively sponsoring terrorism , but
are also violating my fundamental/human rights & obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen
of india.
questions.
PRAYER:
questions.
the case.
c. To legally prosecute the public servants who are responsible for not giving press accreditation to my web news
papers , myself as a journalist and responsible for closure of my news papers.
d. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RPG Cables Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of
e. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s PES College of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me under the
f. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s National Institute of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me under
g. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s Reserve Bank Note Nudran Pvt Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under
h. To legally prosecute authorities of Mysore District Courts & Bangalore District Courts , who denied job opportunities
to me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
j. to legally prosecute judges , police & CBI officials responsible for cover-up of late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination
case.
m. To legally prosecute authorities of supreme court of india for not answering show cause notice issued to them and
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/who-rae-covering---up ,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/judges-cover-up-rajiv-assassination ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---pm-rajiv-assassination-cover-up
Dated : 20TH June 2015 ..FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

14. PIL - Telecables Scam

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Cabinet Secretary ( Telecommunications) Government of India & Others
....Respondents
To ,
2. Eventhough , certain PIJF companies were previously found to be involved in illegal practices , CPIO of DOT / BSNL is
hiding information . Thereby , he is trying to shield criminals.
3. By this action CPIO of DOT / BSNL is aiding criminals.
DOT / BSNL has paid crores of rupees to PIJF Telecable manufacturers towards purchase of cables. The money is
from public exchequer , peoples money . That public money is swindled by cable manufacturers with tacit support of
DOT / BSNL officials. Why no prosecution of DOT / BSNL officials & cable manufacturers ? are they above law ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Accountability for public money worth crores of rupees.
4. Averment:
Private companies in their greed for money are violating norms in league with public officials. They have caused loss
to the public exchequer.
questions.
PRAYER:
questions.
(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case.
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218 ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---telecable-scam
Dated : 13th June 2015.. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India.. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
15. PIL - Killer Noodles , Medicines of India

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Chief Secretary Government of Karnataka & Principal Secretaries , Food & Health , Government of India
....Respondents
To ,
2. Eventhough certain food products are banned & certain medicines are banned in developed nations , still they are
permitted to be manufactured & sold in india.
3. Eventhough certain food products & medicines are manufactured within stipulated limits of ingredients in
developed nations , the multinational companies cross those limits in india.
Are the lives of millions of Indians cheaper , dispensable ? Are the lives of Indians cheaper than the lives of white
skinned people in developed nations.
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , protection of indians lives & prosecution of guilty public servants who permitted
manufacturers / sellers of killer noodles , killer colas & killer medicines.
4. Averment:
Multinational companies , private companies in their greed for money are violating norms by established international
bodies and making money by slowly killing people , by their fake food products & fake medicines. Our own corrupt
central government & state government public servants are giving licenses , clearances to those companies to carry
on their illegal businesses. Who will bear the cost of loss of lives , damages to health of gullible public , hapless Indians
?
questions.
DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none of
them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are &
see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see how
careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has
not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the
PRAYER:
issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases
to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case.
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/pil---threat-to-judge ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---killer-noodles-colas-medicines ,
Dated : 11th June 2015. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
16. PIL - Ye Judges You , everyone of us inferior subservient to CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

Accountability of Judges a MUST
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
.....Petitioner
Versus

....Respondents
IN THE NATURE OF
To ,


C . Every institution in india is directly or indirectly accountable to people , however judiciary alone is not
transparent not giving accounts of its actions to people.
D . Judges enjoy 5 star pay & perks , making merry at the cost of peoples money , public exchequer , but are not
giving accounts of their actions to people , not transparent to the public eye. They are not even honouring RTI
applications seeking information about actions of judges , because corrupt judges will be caught red handed.
E . Judges are not super humans nor super brains nor from moon or mars , they are ordinary mortals from the society
around us and just like us capable of doing good work as well falling prey to human lures like bribe , corruption ,
favoritism , etc.
F. Judges think they are sole custodians of constitution of india , in fact every citizen of india is a custodian of
G . Collegium of judges is nothing but a coterie , a MAFIA proof - unfit corrupt persons like dinakaran ,
another judge involved in mysore roost resort sex scandal being selected by SCI collegium promoted
to the apex court. It is just the tip of iceberg , behind the judicial veil of secrecy many corrupt judges
are hiding. Hereby , I challenge Honourable supreme court of india that subject to conditions I will
bring to book corrupt judges who are hiding behind the veil. Are you ready ?
H . When compared to some corrupt judges who are nothing but criminals , a drain , parasites on our public exchequer
, society , the child workers who are hard working earning less than rupees 32 a day are far better , great human
beings.
I . Ofcourse when the court identifies that intentions of an act of parliament as unconstitutional , it has the right to
strike it down to uphold the supremacy of constitution. NJAC Act passed by parliament was in fact filling a legal
vaccum about accountability & selection of judges and in turn strengthening the constitution of india. But by striking
down NJAC Act of government of india , supreme court of india is weakening constitution of india , making contempt of
parliament , constitution & all Indian citizens. If at all supreme court was really sincere it could have suggested
more alternatives for transparent , accountable judiciary with appropriate transparent provisions for guarding
judicial independence.
J . When government of india passed unconstitutional acts like land acquisition bill , special status to Kashmir ,
against uniform civil code promoted unequal differing civil laws for various religion people and Bhopal gas victims act
, nuclear energy act , etc , did it not dawn on supreme court of india that it is the sole custodian of constitution ? then
why not SCI strike down those unconstitutional parliamentary acts ?
K . It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights of every Indian
citizens . Since 25 years I am appealing to SCI about issues concerning public welfare , national
security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights , human rights are repeatedly
violated but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these
appeals for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made , physically
assaulted , livelihood / jobs were denied , news publication closed , press accreditation denied ,
received threatening calls , blank calls, even to date rough elements follow us , rough elements scout
near home at mid night. Does not these indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI Judges ?
L . Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing unavailability. If at all
information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI ,
Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High Courts , etc.
M . Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including judges. If not on
what basis they give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give infor mation
about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking that person to share infor mation ?
N . If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of
rupees for investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements
running into tens of pages sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge
themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only
cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judges MAFIA at play ?
O . The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime.
With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes
by covering up judges & their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower
middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame
to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us still not do
their constitutional duties properly.
Are Judges above Law & can go scot free ? Can judges cheat , rape , swindle others and go scot free without legal
prosecution ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty. Transparency , accountability in selection
& functioning of Judges.
4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES
& FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted
respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM
SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON
ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN
RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR
TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW
INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ
DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,
RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
Why NOT 3rd degree Torture of Corrupt Doctors , Police & Judges
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.in/2015/10/why-not-3rd-degree-torture-of-doctors.html#links ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/3rd-degree-torture-by-doctors-police ,
Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi to answer the
following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally
apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human beings , some of them
have even became judges through devious means other than merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing
salary & perks from public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.
We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel & martyrs for all the sacrifices made by them. Let us build a
strong , Secular , Democratic India by getting rid off few corrupt elements , anti nationals , traitors among public
servants , among judiciary & among police who are greater threat to Indias unity & integrity than Pakistani terrorists
or chinese military.
Information input forms part of process of ones expression. Ones expression in any forms written , oral , etc
becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information & Expression are
inseparable parts & form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right
as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a persons right to expression is violated , his other rights to
equality , justice , etc also are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.
In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants are functioning. However till date public
servants are hiding behind the veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created by british to suppress
native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement , failures ,
etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming
that CJI is under RTI purview & bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.
Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India , DG & IGP of GOK and others were not
honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned
websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian citizens ,
due to wrong / illegal work practices of Indian judges , police & public servants . The information we sought would
expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals in public service. The information we are seeking are no defense
secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &
strengthens our national security , national unity & integrity.
Hereby , i do request the honourable supreme court of india , for a Supreme Court monitored CBI Enquiry into this
whole issue as karnataka police are helpless , they don't have legal powers to prosecute high & mighty , constitutional
functionaries. They have not even enquired the guilty VVIPs even once however Under pressure from higher-ups they
repeatedly called me the complainant to police station took statements from me all for closing the files.
questions.
PRAYER:
questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to make public all the proceedings of supreme court
collegiums and correspondence between SCI , Presidents office & government of india regarding selection of judges.
To make public all the eligibility criteria followed for selection of judges and who filled what criteria , who didnt fill
which criteria and the final ranking.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india and to protect the
constitutional rights of all Indian citizens including mine.
(iv) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case.
Read : https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---writ-of-mandamus-1 ,
Date : 23rd October 2015Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

17. PIL - Atrocities against Dalits by Government of Karnataka & Others

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Cabinet Secretary , Government of India , Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others
....Respondents
To ,
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and
men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be
lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in
the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston
Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
In Karnataka dalits are oppressed in various ways by the influential people ,
1.
In the recruitment process at Karnataka State Open University , vice chancellor / vested
interests recruited unfit candidates belonging to their own community sidelining the deserving dalit
candidates .
2.
In the recruitment process at Mysore University , vice chancellor / vested interests recruited
unfit candidates belonging to their own community sidelining the deserving dalit candidates .
3.
In the recruitment process at Hassan , Mandya , Mysore & Shimoga Medical Colleges , vested
interests recruited unfit candidates belonging to their own community sidelining the deserving dalit
candidates .
4.
In the recruitment process of KPSC for gazetted officers , vested interests recruited unfit
candidates belonging to their own community sidelining the deserving dalit candidates .
5.
In Karnataka , many privately managed Industrial Training Institutes , Polytechnics have
mushroomed and are getting state government grant. The managements have recruited people
belonging to their own communities completely disregarding the recruitment rules of the
government. Still they are enjoying government grant without any legal prosecution of those
guilty.
6.
The Karnataka government officials immediately evict temporary hutments built by tribals ,
dalits on government land and demolish those hutments. Whereas they allow huge buildings ,
complexes to be built on government land by influential upper caste people. The government has
kept those illegal buildings intact for years , allowed the encroachers to earn lakhs of rupees and
now in the process of regularizing those illegal encroachments.
The honourable governor of Karnataka , instead of taking legal action and legally prosecuting the
guilty has taken side with the guilty themselves. He has approved AKRAMA SAKRAMA scheme of the
government , no action was taken against vice chancellors of KSOU & Mysore University, etc. This is
nothing but indirect way of atrocities against dalits , by supporting perpetrators of atrocities.
As a result , Since years unfit people are working as KAS officers , unfit people are working in KSOU ,
Mysore University , Unfit people are working in medical colleges of Madya / Hassan / Mysore / Shimoga
and earning thousands of rupees monthly salary. Influential upper caste people are earning lakhs of
rupees as rent from land encroachments and are on the verge of becoming legal owners of encroached
lands.
Even in other states also Dalits are oppressed. See the recent suicide of doctoral student in University of
Hyderabad , few moths back we saw dalit atrocity in IIT Chennai.
The poor dalits although talented & deserving are without seats , facilities in educational institutions ,
jobs , without livelihood & shelter.
Are NOT Dalits , citizens of India ? Dont Dalits have constitutional rights & human rights to be treated equally ? Why
not criminal prosecution of high & mighty practicing dalit atrocities ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Protection of Fundamental & Human Rights of all DALITs.
4. Averment:
Corrupt people within Government of Karnataka are violating government norms during recruitment various
educational institutions and while demolishing illegal structures. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of
India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in
the following cases to perform their duties.
PRAYER:
issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties.
(ii) To criminally prosecute government of Karnataka chief secretary & governor of Karnataka , for all the above
mentioned recruitment scandals , for their failure of duties.
(iii) To immediately evict land encroachers & prosecute them irrespective of the caste they belong to. Only eviction of
dalits , tribals , downtrodden people & demolition of hutments belonging to them while sparing big buildings
belonging to rich , influential forward caste people should not be done.
(iv) To annul the moves by Government of Karnataka to regularize big illegal structures built by rich , influential
forward caste people without rehabilitating the evicted dalits , tribals , downtrodden. To declare it as illegal.
(v) To recover monetary gains made by the encroachers.
(vi) To terminate the services of unfit candidates selected in the above mentioned recruitment processes.
(vii) To legally prosecute the recruiting authority officials in all the above recruitments.
(viii) To make proper appointments with due consideration to dalits , backward class people in all the above
institutions , as per law.
(ix) To pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances
of the case.
(x) To take action against those responsible for atrocities against Dalits in University of Hyderabad & IIT Chennai.
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/pil---dalit-atrocities-by-government-of-karnataka
Dated : 19TH January 2015.. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India.. ..PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
18. PIL BANK ROBBERIES by bank executives

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R

.
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Governor , Reserve Bank of India (RBI) & Others
....Respondents
To ,

2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to RBI authorities since years seeking justice regarding illegalities ,
irregularities in recruitment , currency handling , currency theft , etc @ RBI , they didnt provide justice at all.
3. For a common man it is a herculean task to get Rs.5000 loan from a bank , but rich & connected get lakhs , crores
of rupees loan quite easily from banks , how ?
4. When a common man , farmer defaults to pay loan of few thousands of rupees bank immediately dispatches loan
recovery agents / Rowdies , seizes his property & auctions and recover their dues to last penny. Farmers are
committing suicide unable to pay loans to escape from ignominy .
5. Huge companies get crores of rupees loan from banks eventhough basically the project report itself is at fault , not
viable. Siphons off company resources by insider trading to their sister concerns although bank representatives are
very much their on the board of companies.
6 . Such companies default on loan dues to bank , but no recovery agents / rowdies are sent by banks. Finally the
company becomes bust.
7. Bank looses money , the company is declared as NON PERFORMING ASSET and government + bank waives off
interest or else loan itself.
8. End looser the public whose money went down the drain , profiteers company promoters , executives and bank
manager. No recovery from their personal , family properties why ?
9. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to RBI authorities , Union Finance Ministry since years seeking
information under RTI Act regarding illegalities , irregularities in RBI , Various banks , RBI Note Press ( BRBNMPL ) ,
etc , the RBI authorities have evaded answering our questions lest the TRUTH come out. Supreme court of India
specifically Chief Justice of India were also approached to order RBI , Union Finance Ministry to disclose information
to us in public interest. But SCI , CJI also failed to do their duties.
10. The money involved here is public money , it is nobodys papas money.
11. These swindled monies are finding its way to under world , Mafia & Terror outfits. This proves RBI Governor ,
Union Finance Minister and Chief Justice of India are least bothered to safe guard PUBLIC MONEY. They are least
bothered about our national security.
12. We have offered our conditional services to RBI , Union Finance Ministry & SCI to apprehend corporate criminals ,
to recover money while the concerned officials have failed to do their duties. Till date RBI , SCI , Government have
failed to respond to our offer.
13. We SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice once again offer our conditional services to authorities , RBI ,
SCI to legally apprehend corporate criminals , tax evaders & corrupt bank executives and to recover monies from
them. Are RBI , SCI & Union Finance Ministry Ready to catch tax thieves , corporate criminals , corporate terrorists ?
Are they ready to utilize our services ?
14. By , shielding corporate criminals RBI , SCI , Union finance ministry are shielding corporate criminals to continue
financial aid to terrorist outfits , underworld & mafia. Thereby , RBI Governor , Union Finance Minister & CJI , Supreme
Court of India have also become parties to those crimes , they themselves have become criminals.
15. These Huge financial frauds , swindling for years cannt happen repeatedly for years without tacit understanding
, cooperation , collusion , connivance of RBI GOVERNOR and UNION FINANCE MINISTER. These crimes are spared
from fair , timely legal trials with tacit support of Chief Justice of India.
16. These swindled money is destabilizing our economy , funding terrorist outfits , mafia & underworld. These are
posing constant threat to our national security , integrity.
17. By financially supporting funding of criminals , terrorists RBI GOVERNOR , UNION FINANCE MINSTER & CHIEF
JUSTICE OF INDIA themselves have become anti nationals , criminals , terrorists.
Is it right for banks , government to let out fraudsters , bank executives without criminal prosecution & recovery ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of financial frauds.
4. Averment:
questions.
PRAYER:
issue instructions to the concerned public servants , RBI authorities in the following cases to perform their duties & to
answer the below RTI questions.
the case.
c. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RBI & M/s BRBNMPL , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of
d. To legally prosecute responsible bank executives & fraudsters.
e. To make it mandatory for all bank executives including board members to make their income , wealth details public
every year. This must be disclosed under RTI A ct.
f. To form a statutory mechanism to share information about creditors , debtors , borrowers , policy holders ,
insurers , wealth managers , etc between all financial institutions like SEBI , RBI , IRDA , Banks , etc. Creditor , debtor
information must be disclosed under RTI Act.
g. To book criminal cases of Rowdyism , goondaism against rowdy loan recovery agents & respective bank managers.
h. To reopen cases of Currency exchange scandal @ RBI Bangalore incinerator and currency theft cases @ RBI
currency note press , Mysuru. To also legally prosecute bank executives & CBI investigating officials who shielded
original criminals in these cases.
i. To order full payment of unjustly withheld salary , gratuity , pension dues , etc to victimized RBI staff Mr. Ganapathi
Hariram immediately.
j. To appoint a person from lending bank to loan availing companies to monitor its daily financial affairs.
k. To legally prosecute RBI Governor , Chief Justice of India & Union Finance Minister for aiding fund raisers of
terrorists , underworld.
l. To order Government of India to accept our conditional offer of apprehending corporate terrorists.
m. To criminal legal prosecution against promoters of fraud companies , partners in their crimes supporting company
executives and bank executives.
n. To order for recovery of money with interest & penalty , by confiscation of properties of such company promoters ,
their family properties , property of concerned bank executives and most importantly PROPERTIES OF RBI
GOVERNOR , UNION FINANCE MINISTER & CJI must be attached.
Dated : 12th March 2016 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

19.PIL Denial of Super Speciality Treatment by ESIC Hospital

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Director General , Employees State Insurance Corporation , New Delhi & Others
....Respondents
To ,

ESIC is a statutory organization with statutory duties.
ESIC organization , its staff are surviving , thriving on contributions made by we the factory employees and our
company managements.
ESIC officers , doctors are getting tens of thousands of rupees monthly salaries , perks , all by our contributions.
We are toiling hard in factories day & night through out the year and feeding these arrogant ESIC officials ,
doctors.
ESIC as per law promised certain medical services , medical facilities ( including super speciality medical
treatment facilities either at esi hospitals or in private referral hospitals ) to the factory workers in lieu of monthly
insurance contribution , premium payment by factory employees. It is a business deal or a business contract.
Is it right for ESIC officials , Doctors to deny super speciality hospital facilities to the insured persons ?
Are not ESIC officials , doctors directly responsible for premature death of insured persons , aggravation of
diseases , health problems of insured persons due to denial of super speciality health care eventhough they are
entitled to it as per contract , law ?
Are not ESIC officials , Doctors violating law , business contract & rights of factory workers / insured persons ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , protection of constitutional rights , human rights , labour rights , consumer rights of
factory workers , insured persons.
4. Averment:
issue instructions to the concerned public servants , ESIC officials , doctors in the present cases to perform their
duties , to respect the rights of insured persons , factory employees.
PRAYER:
issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the present case , to perform their duties.
the case.
c. To legally prosecute guilty ESIC officials , Doctors who have violated rights of factory employees , insured
persons.
d. To order ESIC to bear the full cost including loss of insured lives due to denial of super speciality treatment.
e. To recover such amount from salaries , pension , properties of guilty ESIC officials , doctors as land arrears , land
dues to government.
Dated : 20th April 2016 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

20. PIL
NO AMNESTY to
Black Money Launderers

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Cabinet Secretary , Government of India & Others
....Respondents
To ,

2. Corruption is rampant in tax enforcement , law enforcement agencies of the government.
3. In India , a small shop owner to big industrialist have mastered the art of TAX EVASION . their teachers
- some corrupt tax officials & auditors. The black money thus created is causing inflation, feeding the
mafia , underworld. Some industrialists lobby ( bribe ) with the government & gets favourable laws
enacted. This black money is the main source of funds for political parties , religious bodies & terrorist
outfits.
The recent raids by C.B.I & KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA have proved how the tax officials have become
multi-millionaires. The sad part is that some of the police officials who are on deputation to C.B.I &
LOKAYUKTHA themselves are utterly corrupt.
This scourge can only be cured by corporate accountability intoto. However , all the industrialists ,
traders who are demanding for more flexible labour reforms , economic reforms , infrastructure , etc are
not at all concerned about their own accountability with respect to tax , environment , other laws. The
MNCs coming to India are not coming here for best Indian talents or infrastructure alone. In their own
countries they are feeling the
heat of strict environment laws , consumer laws , share holder disclosures , corporate accountability.
Some of these MNCs are being kicked out of their countries , by it's own people .These MNCs are aware
that in India , by greasing the palms environment laws , labour laws , tax laws , etc everything can be
flouted , cases in courts can be dragged on for years . share holder disclosures , corporate transparency
is minimum.
4. However when a concerned citizen complains about the crimes of guilty corporates , organizations or
corrupt public servants , immediate action is not taken. The file is kept pending for months , years
together , allowing the criminals to manipulate all the evidences , records , ground situations. Finally
even if action is taken guilty will be let out due to favorable evidences , there are chances that the
concerned citizen himself is falsely implicated & put behind bars . in all such cases all the involved
parties must be subjected to lie detector tests .
Is it right for banks , tax authorities , government to let out fraudsters , guilty bank executives , guilty tax officials
without criminal prosecution & recovery ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of financial frauds / tax evasions.
4. Averment:
questions.
PRAYER:
the case.
c. To legally prosecute responsible bank executives & fraudsters.
d. To make it mandatory for all bank executives , tax officials including board members to make their income , wealth
details public every year. This must be disclosed under RTI A ct.
e. To form a statutory mechanism to share information in real time ( through computer networking) about creditors ,
debtors , borrowers , policy holders , insurers , wealth managers , etc between all financial institutions like SEBI , RBI ,
IRDA , Banks , State and Central Government Tax Authorities etc. Creditor , debtor information must be disclosed
under RTI Act.
f. To appoint a person from lending bank to loan availing companies to monitor its daily financial affairs.
g. To legally prosecute RBI Governor , Chief Justice of India & Union Finance Minister for aiding fund raisers of
terrorists , underworld.
h. To order Government of India to accept our conditional offer of apprehending corporate terrorists.
i. To criminal legal prosecution against promoters of fraud companies , partners in their crimes supporting company
executives and bank executives.
j. To order for recovery of money with interest & penalty , by confiscation of properties of such company promoters ,
their family properties , property of concerned bank executives , tax officials and most importantly PROPERTIES OF
RBI GOVERNOR , UNION FINANCE MINISTER & CJI must be attached.
k. Black Money & Crime are inter twined , two faces of the same coin . Amnesty must not be given to
black money launderers , it is nothing but legalizing the crimes of big criminals & crimes which are
sources of black money. Thereby , government is giving legal sanction to those criminals to commit more
crimes to accumulate black money and government itself is waiving off its duty to legally prosecute
those black money launderers for the crimes which are the sources of those ill gotten money. As per
the constitution , government must do its duty to uphold law , it cannt waive off its own duties. If a
government cannt do its duty , it must get out of the seat.
l. Police , Government , Judges spend thousands of rupees public money to legally prosecute a small
thief caught for stealing hundred rupees , where as now letting out big time looters who have stolen
millions of rupees public money , who have earned money through swindling banks , share holders ,
earned money by illegal money lending , rowdyism , drug trafficking , human trafficking , etc. It is
against principle of equitable justice , law. If the government is not able to catch , prosecute these
black money launderers , it is unfit to be in the seat.
m. To immediately give a stay to the moves by government of india , giving amnesty to black money
launderers from 01st June 2016. Also , annul such laws enacted by government of India.
Dated : 14th May 2016 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

21. PIL - Atrocities against Dalits by Government

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
....Petitioner
Versus
Cabinet Secretary , Government of India , Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others
....Respondents
To ,

has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
In India dalits , tribals are oppressed in various ways by the influential people with the aid of authorities and by
authorities , police themselves.
India is a democratic country with peoples self governance. Here laws must be framed as per the wishes of people.
MPs , MLAs , MLCs are just postmans of public passing on the message of peoples aspirations in the respective
houses , parliament , legislative assembly.
MPs , MLAs , MLCs dont have legal , moral , democratic right to impose any laws much against the wishes of their
own people. It is illegal. When people in a specified area doesnt want a bauxite mining company in their area as it
affects the local ecology , their livelihood , their health , life how can MPs , MLAs give legal sanction to establishment
of such companies ? How can MPs , MLAs impose such projects on people much against their wishes ?
These type of functioning by ruling MPs , MLAs since decades favoring the rich , suppressing the poor has given
rise to various people movements including naxalism. Ofcourse , as the act of our MPs , MLAs are illegal , some acts
of these movements are also illegal. Instead the people associated with these movements must take up non violent
path for expressing their disagreements with the government actions.
The government by misusing its powers , police machinery is illegally arresting , torturing innocents , murdering
innocents to suppress the voices seeking justice. The government is also illegally aiding various terrorist outfits like
salwa judum , salwa judum-2 , Jharkhand jan mukti parishad , etc all to silence voices seeking justice.
The government is targeting , illegally arresting , torturing journalists , lawyers who are legally supporting the voices
seeking justice. The government has gone to the extreme of SUMMARILY DISMISSING A SITTING JUDGE as he
legally did his duty & upheld the rule of law.
Are NOT Dalits , Tribals citizens of India ? Dont Dalits , Tribals have constitutional rights & human rights to be treated
equally ? Why not criminal prosecution of high & mighty practicing dalit atrocities, atrocities against dalits , tribals ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Protection of Fundamental & Human Rights of all DALITs & TRIBALs.
4. Averment:
Corrupt people within Government in their greed for money are framing illegal , unjust laws much against the
aspirations of people. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
Mandamus and to issue instructions to the Government of india and all state governments to protect the
constitutional rights , human rights of all dalits , tribals in india and to strictly work , legislate laws as per the wishes ,
aspirations of people.
PRAYER:
issue instructions to the concerned public servants of government of india and all state governments in the following
cases to perform their duties.
To immediately reinstate Mr. Prabhakar Gwal , Chief Judicial Magistrate , Sukma , Chattisgarh into judicial service.
To make posting at the same place , same court of Sukma , so that he can complete the cases concerning the
powers that be to the logical end.
To initiate criminal legal prosecution against district collector , police officials , public servants who directly &
indirectly interfered in the judicial duties performed by Mr. GWAL.
To initiate criminal legal prosecution against Chhattisgarh High Court Judges who instead of upholding rule of law ,
supporting Mr. Gwal in his duties took sides with criminal nexus , powers that be and repeatedly transferred him and
now dismissed him from service without enquiry.
To reopen all the buried cases which were dealt by Mr. Gwal and buried by transfer of judge Mr. Gwal. To take action
against ministers , public servants involved in those cases.
To initiate criminal action against sukma district collector , police officials and Chhattisgarh High Court Judges on
charges of Atrocities against DALIT Mr. Gwal who was repeatedly harassed by them.
To initiate criminal prosecution under anti terror laws , against present and past chattisgarh state government
ministers , central government ministers , other state government ministers of jharkand , bihar , Andhra Pradesh ,
odisha , west Bengal , etc and police officials , public servants of those governments who were and are responsible
for creation of terror outfits like SALWA JUDUM , its recent terror child salwa judum 2 , Jharkhand mukti parishad ,
etc. These public servants have indulged in terror acts of salwa judum , other outfits by aiding & sponsoring it ,
which is against law.
To immediately annul all the laws , orders passed by government of india , other state governments authorizing land
acquisition , establishment of big industries , mines much against the wishes , aspirations of people.
To immediately annul Imposition of big projects on people by MPs , MLAs much against the resistance of people.
To order authorities to release lawyers , journalists who are illegally detained for legally supporting people seeking
justice.
To immediately arrest , legally prosecute Mr.Ajit Doval for showing contempt of court , interfering , influencing the
judicial process in the name of discussion with judges. Government itself is the biggest litigant in the country.
To pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case.
Dated : 06th May 2016.. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India.. ..PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
22. PIL Treat Police Constables Humanely

An Appeal to National Human Rights Commission of India and Supreme Court of India
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.
OF
2016
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
.
....Petitioner
Versus
....Respondents
To ,
1. Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.
2. Honble Chairman , National Human Rights Commission of India

Police constables are also Human Beings and must be treated as such by superior officers and all.
As every other Human Being , police constables also has got human rights of equality , dignity of labor , equitable
justice.
As Indian citizens police constables has constitutionally guaranteed rights of equality , equitable justice , etc.
Police constables are appointed , trained for the very specific purpose of maintaining law , order and detecting
crimes.
When police constables are treated humanely by superiors and others , they will reciprocate the same.
Police constables are always under the threat of criminals , anti nationals , mafia. But they are not paid any
compensation by government when murdered by criminals , on the lines of soldiers becoming martyr during war.
Government has enacted laws enforcing equal pay for equal work , 1 earned leave for 20 working days , maximum
of 8 working hours , one paid weekly off after 48 working hours or 6 days , for all private & public sector employees.
In case of urgency over time work can be allotted to worker with his willingness ( not forced ) at the rate of double
wages. For violation of these laws , labor department officials will prosecute guilty company executives.
Since decades , police constables are not paid equal wages in comparison to their counterparts in other states and
with people of their own rank like teachers , electric line mans , etc in our state itself. Everyday they are forced to
work beyond 8 hours without any additional wages. Leaves are not sanctioned. They are addressed by first name in
vulgar language by superior officers and forced to do menial jobs by superior officers which are not part of police
manual or service rules. Those who refuse to do it are dismissed by superior officers citing indiscipline. Day in day
out every second police constables are treated inhumanely by superior officers. POLICE CONSTABLES HUMAN
RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED by superior officers since decades. These police constables work under extreme
psychological stress and some police constables vent out their anger on innocents , suspects in lock up by using
3rd degree torture methods. Some other constables have fired at their superior officers and some have gone to the
extreme of committing suicide.
In the name of discipline , job security , the doors to legal redress of grievances are shut for police constables.
Till violation of Human Rights of Police Constables are not stopped , you can not stop human rights violations by
police , 3rd degree torture of innocents , lock up deaths by police.
Is it right for senior government officials , police officers , ministers , judges to violate HUMAN RIGHTS ,
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS of Police Constables ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , protection of constitutional rights , human rights of police constables and Prosecution
of guilty judges , police officers , IAS officers , ministers.
4. Averment:
Please read following cases at website mentioned below :
http://www.livelaw.in/tamil-nadu-judge-serves-memo-female-court-staff-not-washing-innerwear/ ,
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/115594/these-cops-much-abused-bosses.html ,
issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties , to respect the
Human Rights , Constitutional Rights of police constables.
PRAYER:
issue instructions to the chief secretaries of all stae governments , the concerned public servants in the present
case , to perform their duties.
the case.
c. To legally prosecute guilty judges , police officers , IAS officers , ministers and their family members who are ill
treating ( under threat ) police constables and violating their human rights , constitutional rights.
d. To immediately ban colonial era system of providing police constables as orderlies to senior government
officials , judges , ministers.
e. To immediately order respective state governments to pay over time pay to all police constables with back
wages , over time wages since their appointment till date.
f. To immediately order state governments to start process of police constables recruitment.
g. To give staggered weekly off to all police constables without fail.
h. To order state governments to strictly pay equal wages for equal work to all police constables in comparison to
their counter parts in other states and state government employees of their same rank in their own states.
i. To order state governments to pay compensation to police constables who die in the line of duty on par with
military compensation.
j. To order state government to constitute district committees comprising of district head of police , doctor ,
psychiatrist , behavior specialist and human rights expert , providing a forum for victimized police constables to air
their grievances and in turn getting counseling , grievance redress. This will go a long way in controlling 3rd degree
torture of innocents by police , lock up deaths also.

23. PIL Ban Orderly services performed by Police Constables , others

An Appeal to National Human Rights Commission of India and Supreme Court of India

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.
OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
....Respondents
To ,
1. Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.
2. Honble Chairman , National Human Rights Commission of India

Police constables are appointed , trained for the very specific purpose of maintaining law , order and detecting
crimes.
Dalayaths , peons in various state & central government departments are appointed , trained for the very specific
purpose of assisting their immediate superior in official duties.
Police constables , Peons , Dalayaths are PUBLIC SERVANTS / GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS paid from public exchequer
to do public duties.
Police Constables , Peons , Dalayaths are Human Beings , deserve respect by all including their superiors.
Police Constables , Peons , Dalayaths are ill treated , they are treated as SLAVES / Bonded Labourers
by their superior judges , police officers , IAS officers , Ministers , etc. They are forced to do menial
jobs (other than official duties ) like clearing night soil from sewage line , washing under wears ,
clothes of officer & his family members , polishing shoes of officers , their family members , washing
clothes , cooking utensils , etc.
If the officer & his family members are suffering from PARALYSIS or any other health problems which makes them
unable to perform their own work , then they can appoint private persons by paying from their personal pockets.
Is it right for senior government officials to force ( under threat ) their subordinate officials to do officers
personal , private work ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , protection of constitutional rights , human rights of police constables , dalayaths ,
peons and Prosecution of guilty judges , police officers , IAS officers , ministers.
4. Averment:
Please read following cases at website mentioned below :
http://www.livelaw.in/tamil-nadu-judge-serves-memo-female-court-staff-not-washing-innerwear/ ,
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/115594/these-cops-much-abused-bosses.html ,
issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties , to respect the rights
of police constables , dalayaths , peons. To assign proper official duties to police constables , dalayaths & peons.
PRAYER:
issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the present case , to perform their duties.
the case.
c. To legally prosecute guilty judges , police officers , IAS officers , ministers and their family members who are ill
treating ( under threat ) police constables , dalayaths , peons.
d. To immediately ban colonial era system of providing orderlies to senior government officials.

24. PIL
Justice Delayed & Justice Denied

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Justice of India
& Others
....Respondents
To ,

a. Every human being , every Indian citizen are equal and guaranteed equitable justice as their human right and
Constitutional right.
b. In india mafia of powers that be and government ensure that cases drag on for years , so that poor litigant
either dies before judgement day or opts out in the middle. Due to this delaying tactics , many poor people rather
suffer injustice instead of seeking justice in courts. Mafia indirectly forces them to keep away from litigation.
c. Due to occupation induced health problems my health is deteriorating day by day , some of the PILs concerning
national security , public welfare I have filed are two decades old , still no justice in sight. Judges not even
admitted the cases.
d. Actual working hours , working days for judges are less in india. Too many case adjournments , less number of
judges , too many holidays for judges like summer vacation , winter vacation , working hours less than 8 hours per
day , etc.
e. Judges work less but enjoy 5 star pay & perks at public expense.
f. Due to denial of justice common people suffer injustice for more time or till their death. Say some falsely
implicated persons suffer in jail for years till their acquittal by courts , some petty criminals whose crime attracts
one year imprisonment suffers in jail for ten years. Because they are not well connected , cannt afford hi fi
advocates , bail fees.
g. Due to lethargic judiciary , some land acquisition cases drag on for years land looser suffers also the
project cost escalates by hundreds thousands of crores of rupees.
h. The lethargic Judiciary in India itself is the biggest violator of common mans human rights , fundamental
rights. It is the culprit responsible for loss of thousands of crores of rupees to public exchequer due to project cost
escalations.
i. when a common mans human rights , human rights is violated in the form of delaying tactics by court of
law , judiciary , the presiding judge becomes a criminal and liable to pay damages to the aggrieved.
j. The central government and state government yearly spend thousands of crores of rupees unnecessarily like
purchasing new cars for ministers , renovation , interior decorations of ministers bungalows , foreign jaunts , etc.
These are all not priority one spending. Out of these spending how many more judges could be appointed , paid
salaries.
k. when compared to project cost escalations of thousands of crores of rupees caused due to case delays , is it
not wise on the part of government to appoint requisite number of judges with additional budget burden of few
crores of rupees.
l. Both central and state governments are the biggest litigants in the country.
m. Government is manipulating judicial process by denying finance to appoint more judges , to create more court
infrastructures.
n. We common people are imposed with time limits to mandatorily comply with, in our interactions with other
public , with government authorities , with courts itself. For our failures we common people are penalized.
0. Paradoxically , there is no mandatory time limits for judges , public servants to finish specific works concerning
public. In most of the cases they adopt delaying tactics , deny justice still they are not penalized and dont pay any
compensation to the aggrieved public.
p. Due to delaying tactics of judges , many anti national crimes , terror attacks took place and still continuing which
could have been well averted in time if judges took timely action. For helping mafia by the way of delayed justice ,
mafia rewards some of those judges with post retirement postings , promotions , site allotments , etc.
q. The Judiciary has the right , authority , power to order government to allocate finance for appointing judges ,
setting up court infrastructure. If the government gives ruse of no money in its account , courts can definitely
monitor spending of government , cut down on waste , non-priority spending of government , divert such money for
appointment of judges , court infrastructure development. No need for CJI to weep before prime minister. Judges
themselves never consider the sufferings of weeping litigants. It shows the weakness of CJI and a shame to our
nation.
We once again appeal to Honourable CJI , Supreme Court of India to take action on the following
PILs , to answer the show cause notice and to order the concerned public servants to answer RTI
questions. The officials of SCI dont even have etiquette , decorum to reply to our letters. Some
of my appeals are two decades old.
poor innocents.

even heaven.
Is it right for judges to deny justice . is it right on the part of judges to delay justice under various ruses to common
man , violate their human rights , fundamental rights.
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of judges , police , public servants responsible for case delays.
4. Averment:
Please read details at :
Honourable Chief Justice of India TAKE ACTION
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honourable-cji-take-action ,
https://www.scribd.com/doc/312858947/Honourable-CJI-Take-Action
questions.
sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , common men & see how careless our judges are towards anti national
crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are
admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.
PRAYER:
the case.
c. To legally prosecute responsible , concerned
judges , police & public servants.
d. To cancel winter , summer vacation holidays for judges.

e. To bring down the holidays of courts per year to twelve on the lines of industrial establishments.
f. To make it mandatory for judges to conduct court hearings for 8 hours per day.
g. To bring down unnecessary court adjournments.
h. to reserve precious court timings only for arguments , cross examination of litigants , witnesses.
i. to use information technology , internet for issue of notices , summons and litigants submitting documents ,
applications instead of wasting court time.
j. to introduce working of courts on shift basis in the same infrastructure.
k. to appoint retired judges immediately to bring down gaps in judges requirement.
l. to order the biggest litigant government of india and all state governments to frame laws strictly in
accordance with constitution.
m. to order governments to give proper training for public servants , IAS officers , KAS officers , others about law
of the land.
o. to make specific public servants personally responsible for wrong applications of law while discharging their
duties and to make them pay compensation from their personal pockets.
p. to order Chief Justice of India to pay compensation of Rupees TWO CRORES to Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice , towards the damages he has suffered due to delayed justice.
q. to order the respective judges , police in all cases of case delays more specifically in the below mentioned cases to
pay compensation to innocent victims. Make a guideline for compensation payment. Legally prosecute guilty judges ,
police.
r. to frame a guideline for bail & parole procedure. When it is violated by judges , police , jail authorities , other public
servants order them to pay compensation and legally prosecute guilty judges , police , jail officials.
Dated : 08.06.2016 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

edited , printed , published & owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA
cell : 91 8970318202
home page:
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,
http://paper.li/f-1367938674
Follow me at
http://www.facebook.com/people/Nagaraj-Mysore-Raghupathi/513253184 ,
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw ,
http://twitter.com/naghrw ,
Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw
A
Member of Amnesty International

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

S.O.

e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web

Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed

Editorial : Honourable Judges Do Your Duty or Resign

Judges , Police bound to pay for case delays

If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents Chief Justice of India together with

Justice Delayed & Justice Denied

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents Chief Justice of India together with

judges , police & public servants.

d. To cancel winter , summer vacation holidays for judges.

Dated : 08.06.2016 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

After 29 years, man acquitted of stealing Rs 57

8 People Who Were Executed and Later Found Innocent

Presumed Guilty: After 14 wasted years in prison, life begins anew

Mohammed Aamir was also lodged in Delhis Tihar jail.

Justice Delayed- Justice Denied

Still they are waiting

Delayed justice: When judgement day arrives too late

Click here for enlarge

The slow moving wheels of Indian judiciary

In search of lost time

find it difficult to furnish bail even if it's a small amount.

15 judicial officers compulsorily retired by Allahabad HC in UP

SHOW CAUSE NOTICE TO CJI Justice T.S. THAKUR

making contempt of the very august office you hold.

Read full case details at :

Date : 23.04.2016...yours sincerely,

PIL - CJI a Criminal ?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

Crime , When a POLICE Himself robs , Murders .

Half of former CJIs Corrupt :

Atrocities on Women by JUDGES

Date : 29th October 2015Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

Dated : 10th December 2015 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

PIL Before Supreme Court of USA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF USA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016

H.E.Honourable President of USA & Others

Petition under BILL OF RIGHTS and Human Rights Charter

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

1. Facts of the case:

Date : 31st January 2016Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

PIL - India , Pakistan , USA sponsoring TERRORISM

Double speak of Government

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016

H.E.Honourable President of India & Others

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

Date : 23rd January 2016Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

PIL Mercy Death Plea to Honourable Chief Justice of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

l. To reopen , reinvestigate assassination case of Late PM Rajiv Gandhi.