Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Amhmed M. AL AELA
Director: Professor. Jean-Pierre Kenn
item
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Contents
Introduction
Proposal
Objectives
Significance
Literature Review
Chart of Proposer
Methodology
Time Line
List of references
Introduction
Page
3
9
10
11
11
14
15
16
17
Elecrohydraulic servo systems (EHSS) are known for their ability to deliver
fast, accurate, low construction, high power to weight ratio, long life, low
maintenance cost, and high power responses in several industrial
applications. The general applications of EHSS include industrial robots,
aerospace flight-control actuators, automobile active suspensions, as well as
a variety of automated manufacturing systems. There are two categories of the
EHSS, first one is an electrohydraulic servovalve, the other is an electrohydraulic
compared to servovalve system specially when a valve on the standby position. The
actuators controlled by electrohydraulic servo valves provide extremely fast and accurate
response. Despite their low energy efficiency, this configuration is the most encountered
in the industry. In this work will be using electrohydraulic servo valve. The servo valve is
the main source of the effectiveness of EHSS ( Honorine ANGUE MINTSA, 2011,
ALGORITHMES DE COMMANDE DES SYSTMES LECTROHYDRAULIQUES
DYNAMIQUE VARIABLE, PhD thesis). Single-stage servo valves and two-stage
servo-valves are two types of commonly encountered servovalves. Twostage electrohydraulic servo valves do not have the limitations in the static
and dynamic performance. These servo valves are robust and can handle
heavy loads requiring variable movements and efforts (Merritt, 1967). They
have very high bandwidths (Li, 2002). In addition, the two-stage servo
valves have an internal feedback mechanism. Movement or force on the
movable slide is measured by a sensor.
Opening section
Reference
signal
electric signal
Law Control
Dynamics of
servo valve
Movement
effort
actual movement
Mechanical
load dynamics
effective force
Sensor
Figure 2 shows the dynamics block diagram of a EHSS in which the actuator
is controlled by a servo valve. The dynamics of the valve is governed by a
transfer function relating the control signal to the opening of the valve
section. Depending on the sign and the intensity of the electric signal, the
servo adjusts its opening area in order to modulate the flow rate and the
pressure at the terminals of the actuator. The outflow of the servo valve is
the product of the opening section and flow velocity of the fluid. The
dynamics of the actuator is described by the momentum equation. The flow
from the servo valve is divided into a useful flow to the load movement, a
flow lost in leaks and in another speed lost in the compressibility of EHSS
components. The flow and pressure received by the actuator becomes a
movement and a mechanical force transmitted to the load respectively. The
dynamic load is represented by applying Newton's second law. Depending
on resistant forces, the load moves through effort and effective movement.
That is why EHSS are known as highly nonlinear of the dynamic behavior
with models. The expression for the fluid flow across the servovalve, as well
as static and dynamic friction terms for the hydraulic actuator are
responsible for some of the complexity of these systems. In addition,
hydraulic parameters may vary due to temperature changes and effects such
as an entrapment of air in the hydraulic fluid. Also, EHSS also suffers from a
large extent of model uncertainties. The uncertainties can be classified into
two main groups which are parametric uncertainties and uncertain
nonlinearities. Example of parametric uncertainties is large changes in load
and the large variations in hydraulic parameter such as bulk modulus due to
component wear or temperature change. Meanwhile, external disturbance,
leakage and friction are called uncertain nonlinearities. These uncertainties
can cause hydraulic actuator system controller to be unstable or to have
degradation in its performance. Finally, external disturbances and noise
effects result in challenges to ensure precise control of EHSS (H. Mintsa, R.
Venugopal, and J.-P. Kenn, 2012).
The modeling of a dynamic system is used to study the interactions between
the control variables (entries of the system) and the state variables (system
outputs). The operation of a dynamic system and predicting its behavior in
response to a control law are analyzed from a simulation model. The
mathematical model describing the dynamics of a system is found using the
laws of physics.
There are many kinds of control techniques that use to control EHSS. PID
control is used extensively to control EHSS, but the closed-loop
Where:
Reference model specifies the ideal (desired) response ym to the external
command r.
Controller is parameterized and provides tracking.
Adaptation is used to adjust parameters in the control law.
Plant has a known structure but the parameters are unknown.
Abstract:
Electrohydraulic servo systems (EHSS) are applied for many engineering
applications. EHSS characterizes as high power, high power to weight ratio,
fast and smooth response, high stiffness, and high load capability. However,
their closed-loop performance is limited by using a classical controllers,
because EHSS are highly nonlinear system and also a large extent of
uncertainties. In this study will be focused on supply pressure variations in a
rotational electrohydraulic drive, uncertainties bidirectional friction, external
disturbances, and noise on the experimental measurements. The aim of the
thesis is a comparative study between different control laws, and show that
the performance can be further improved using the recommended control
law.
Objectives
Electrohydraulic servo systems( EHSS) are used for several engineering
applications. Load simulator is a crucial equipment in the hardware in the
loop experiments widely used in industrial applications. The main objectives
Significance
EHSS are essential components in a wide range of modern machinery, due to
their high power-to-weight ratio, as well as their fast and accurate response.
Some commonly encountered industrial applications of EHSS include
10
Literature review
Electrohydraulic servosystem is one of the major drives in industrial section
and engineering activities due to its circumlocution(high power density , fast
and smooth response, high stiffness and good positioning capability) in some
applications, on the other hand, EHSS is high both nonlinear and uncertain
control systems. Many of control algorithms that were published have been
proposed in order to overcome its nonlinear dynamic behavior. Most of
publishers worked on linear actuators. There are different EHSS algorithms
techniques that were published according to EHSS modeling, and/or EHSS
controller design. First, system modeling can be based on system physical
laws, or system identification method ( black box identification). A
researcher who wants to use a system physical law must has expert
knowledge and able to analyze the system behavior. However, most of the
researchers assumed the hydraulic parameters that are not in the linear form
11
are to be known and constant. For example, pressure parameter and leakage
parameters are assumed known and constant. The system identification is
easier because it only requires a set of stimulus response data and no prior
knowledge about the system in order to construct the model. Thus, many of
researchers use this technique to make the EHSS modeling. In contrast, this
technique might be built based on assumptions and/or boundary conditions
that may make a limitation of the system. Second, Electrohydraulic
servosystem controller design are used in all published papers to improve the
tracking control law trajectories. Many types of controllers are introduced by
researchers such as, linear control technique, nonlinear control technique,
hybrid control technique, and adaptive control approach. Linear control
techniques are proposed in most previous published papers i.e. classical
Proportional- Integral-Differential controller (PID), and classical feedback
linearization,..etc. Recent studies shows that the closed-loop performance is
limited by using the PID control approach (H. Mintsa, R. Venugopal, and J.P. Kenn, 2012)., a classical feedback linearization performance is limited
that may degrade some important dynamic information (J. Seo, R.
Venugopal, J.P. Kenne, 2007), but the results were shown an improved
performance compared with PID controller. On the other hand, a lot of
researchers have been proposed advanced control strategies to improve
12
Literature review
Find problematic and choice of methodology
Mathematical modeling of the EHSS and developed
study of classical control laws
Methodology
This study will be through the following sequence:
1. Literature review for problematic and choice of methodology.
2. Mathematical modeling of the EHSS and developed study of classical
14
control laws.
2.1 The dynamics described by mathematical model that will be
obtained by physical laws of EHSS encompasses the
essential dynamic of EHSS.
2.2 State space representations equations.
3. Development of a control law compensating for the uncertainty of
operating pressure.
4. Development of a control law compensating for the uncertainty of
friction, disturbances and hydraulic parameters.
5. Implementation of a real-time control law with Xpc target
15
Time line.
The research will be done as planned below
16
References:
N. Ishak, M. Tajjudin, Real-time Application of Self-tuning PID in Electrohydraulic Actuator,IEEE International Conference on Control System,
Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE), pp. 364368, 2011.
T. G. Ling, M. F. Rahmat, and A. R. Husain, ANFIS Modeling and Direct
ANFIS Inverse Control of an Electro-Hydraulic Actuator System,8th IEEE
Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), pp. 370
375, 2013.
H. Shakouri G. and H. R. Radmanesh, Identification of a continuous time
nonlinear state space model for the external power system dynamic
equivalent by neural networks,International Journal of Electrical Power &
Energy Systems, vol. 31, no. 78, pp. 334344, 2009.
J. Reedy and G. T.-C. Chiu, Adaptive robust motion control of single-rod
hydraulic actuators: theory and experiments, IEEE/ASME Trans.
Mechatronics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7991, 2000.
A. G. Loukianov, E. Sanchez, and C. Lizalde, Force tracking neural block
control for an electrohydraulic actuator via second-order sliding
mode,International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 18, pp.
319332, 2008.
A. Alleyne and J. K. Hedrick, Nonlinear adaptive control of active
suspensions, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 3, pp.
94-101, 1995
C. Guan and S. Pan, Nonlinear Adaptive Robust Control of Single-Rod
Electro-Hydraulic Actuator With Unknown Nonlinear Parameters, IEEE
Transactions on Control Systems Technology, , vol. 16, pp. 434-445, 2008
B. Yao, J. Zhang, D. Koehler, and J. Litherland, "High performance swing
velocity tracking control of hydraulic excavators," American Control
Conference, vol.2, pp. 818-822, 1998.
J. W. Raade and H. Kazerooni, Analysis and Design of a Novel Hydraulic
Power Source for Mobile Robots, Automation Science and Engineering,
IEEE Transactions on, vol. 2, pp. 226-232, 2005.
17
D. Sha, V. B. Bajic, and H. Yang, New model and sliding mode control of
hydraulic elevator velocity tracking system, Simulation Practice and
Theory, vol. 9, pp. 365-385, 2002.
H. A. Mintsa and J.P. Kenne, Feedback Linearization-Based Position
Control of an Electrohydraulic Servo System With Supply Pressure
Uncertainty,Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 20,
pp. 1092-1099, 2012.
M. Pendo, F. West, P. Jonathan, L. Angeles, and H. Daniel, Digitally
Controlled Simple Shear Apparatus for Dynamic Soil Testing ed: ASTM,
2007.
M. F. Rahmat, A. R. Husain, K. Ishaque, and M. Irhouma, Self-Tuning
Position Tracking Control of an Electro-Hydraulic Servo System in the
Presence of Internal Leakage and Friction, International Review of
Automatic Control, vol. 3, pp. 673-683, 2010.
C. Luo, Y. Shang, Z. Jiao, and Z. Wang, A new type of electro-hydraulic
actuator used for aircraft structural test,International Conference on
Automatic Control and Artificial Intelligence (ACAI 2012), pp. 191194,
2012.
M. Al-Majed and M. Tomizuka, High-performance robust motion control of
machine tools: an adaptive robust control approach and comparative
experiments,IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, , vol. 2, pp. 6376, 1997.
D. Hisseine, Robust tracking control for a hydraulic actuation system,
Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Conference in Control Applications (CCA 2005),
pp. 422-42, 2005.
M. Engineering,Y. Liu and H. Handroos, Technical note Sliding mode
control for a class of hydraulic position servo, Mechatronics, vol. 9, pp.
111-123, 1999.
N. Niksefat and N. Sepehri, A QFT fault-tolerant control for
electrohydraulic positioning systems, IEEE Transactions on Control
Systems Technology, , vol. 10, pp. 626-632, 2002.
18
23