Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The theory studies the role of male and female in a patriarchal society.
Aspects to look at during analysis
How male dominance and female powerlessness manifest themselves in specific aspects
of society through a text. If this is true, it shows that the stereotype of woman being less
than men in a patriarchal society.
Patriarchy: any culture that privileges men by promoting traditional gender roles.
1. Consider the roles and situations of female characters. Make lists of different aspects of the
2.
3.
4.
female character's place in the overall story. Include anecdotal scenarios that will back up a
holistic thesis.
Look at the relationship of female characters to each other. Examine any discrepancies that might
shed light on the overall role of females in the book.
Review the role of female characters in relation to their male counterparts. Literary criticism has
its famous set of contrasts, for example, man vs. nature, nature vs. society, that set up points of
inquiry. In this case, your fundamental contrast would be woman vs. man.
Consider the attitudes of characters and how their world-views contribute to the eventual
outcomes in the story. The goals of characters may or may not cause outcomes. Evaluate how
"powerful" each character becomes.
What are the power relationships between men and women (or characters assuming
male/female roles)?
Do characters take on traits from opposite genders? How so? How does this change others
reactions to them?
What does the work reveal about the operations (economically, politically, socially, or
psychologically) of patriarchy?
What does the work imply about the possibilities of sisterhood as a mode of resisting
patriarchy?
What does the history of the work's reception by the public and by the critics tell us about the
operation of patriarchy?
What role the work play in terms of women's literary history and literary tradition?
Marxism
How does the authors social and economic class show through the work?
Does the work support the economic and social status quo, or does it
advocate change?
What role does class play in the work; what is the authors analysis of class
relations?
What does the work say about oppression; or are social conflicts ignored or
blamed elsewhere?
Does the work propose some form of utopian vision as a solution to the
problems encountered in the work?
In what ways does the work serve as propaganda for the status quo; or does
it try to undermine it?
Does the literature reflect the authors own class or analysis of class
relations?