Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. 97-1796
LEEVONN CLOUD,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
____________________
Before
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam.
___________
Plaintiff-appellant
Leevonn
Cloud
appeals pro
___
se from the
__
U.S.C.
1981.
dismissal of his
amended complaint
The instant
complaint recounts
events surrounding
Community
Works.
As
violations of 42 U.S.C.
Board
Frances Froehlich,
Director; Robert
eleven
other
the
complaint
of Directors; Patricia
Director;
and
amended,
Works; its
its
former Interim
individual
alleges
members of
Executive
Board of Directors;
the
Board.
In
state law.
The
the
1981 claim
it declined jurisdiction
1367(c)(3).1
1
___
____________________
the complaint
alternative
Defendants
although
ground
do
not
dismissed as
that they
were
renew
this
defendants argued
to them
never properly
argument
on
on the
served.
appeal,
and,
to
effect
proper service
States Marshal.
See, e.g.,
___ ____
is
failure to
attributable
to the
Dumaguin v. Secretary of
________
____________
issue
Rule
effect service
is grounds
for
-2-
We
failure to state
a claim.
(1st Cir.
1996).
complaint
as true and
the
plaintiff's
We
favor.
Id.
___
Contrary
in the
inferences in
to
appellees'
suggestion,
civil
heightened
pleading
rights
claims
requirement.
are
not
subject
Moreover,
as
to
pro se
___ __
construed."
his
claim of
Paret,
Williams
of the defendants.
discriminatory
and Community
Works.
However, we
reinstate
termination against
Williams,
In
some unspecified
period,
a fund-
people in attendance.
Paret
allegedly
in a
room full
from
of white people,
allegations in
think
that these
the complaint
that
both Williams
allegations are
We infer
sufficient
Cloud.
to survive
and
We
____________________
Froehlich, but
are not
persuaded that
-3-
they support
an
of
this case
should the
pleadings
be tested
in a
prompt
12(b)(6).
be upheld as to all
Cloud
has not
specifically
suggest that
remand,
he is
Cloud is
discretion,
to
now pursuing
free to
exercise
ask
requested
them in state
the district
supplemental
that we
defendants
court.
On
court, in
its
jurisdiction.
We
further proceedings.
___________________
-4-