Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 66

Inventory Management

Chapter 12

Prentice Hall 2007

General Considerations

Marketing-prefer large quantities of inventory


Accounting/Finance-tied up capital
Operations-tool that can be used to promote
efficient operation of the production facilities
Inventories are simply allowed to fluctuate so
that production can be adjusted to its most
efficient level.

Types of Inventory

Pipeline Inventories: exist because materials


must be moved from one location to another.
Buffer Inventories (safety stocks): provide
protection against irregularities or uncertainties
in an items demand or supply.
Anticipation Inventories: needed for products
with seasonal patterns of demand and uniform
supply.
3

Types of Inventory

Cycle Inventories (Lot-size inventories): exists


whenever orders are made in larger quantities
than needed to satisfy immediate requirements.
Results from ordering in batches or lots rather
than as needed.

Forms of Inventories

Raw Materials: objects, commodities, elements,


and items that are received (usually purchased)
from outside the organization to be used directly
in the production of the final output.
Maintenance, repair, and operating supplies:
used to support and maintain the operation,
including spares, supplies, and stores.

Forms of Inventories

Work-In-Process (WIP): all the materials, parts,


and assemblies that are being worked on or are
waiting to be processed within the operations
system.
Finished Goods: stock of completed products.

Placement of Inventories

Standard: An item is made to stock or ordered


to stock and normally the item is available upon
request.
Special: An item made to order.

Inventory-Related Costs
Ordering or Setup Costs: ordering costs are associated with
outside procurement of material and setup costs are costs
associated with internal procurement (i.e. internal manufacture)
of parts of material.
Ex: writing the order, processing the order through the purchasing
system, postage, processing invoices, handling, testing,
inspection, transportation, setup labor, machine downtime due
to a new setup, parts damaged during setup.
Inventory Carrying or Holding Costs: cost items related to
inventory quantity, items value, and length of the time the
inventory is carried.
Ex: interest on money invested in inventory and in the land,
buildings, and equipment necessary to hold and maintain the
inventory; heat, power, and light, salaries of security personnel,
taxes and insurance on equipment; insurance on inventory,
physical deterioration of the inventory.

Inventory-Related Costs
Stockout Costs: if inventory is unavailable when
customers request it, a situation that marketing
detests, or when it is needed for production, a
stockout occurs.
Ex: lost goodwill, lost sales, cost associated with
processing back orders (such as extra paperwork,
special handling, and higher shipping costs)

Determining inventory system


performance

Inventory turnover: relates inventory levels to the


products sales volume.
Turnover is often used to compare an individual
firms performance with others in the same industry
or to monitor the effects of a change in inventory
decision rules.
Inventory turnover

Cost of goods sold


Average aggregate inventory value

10

Example of measuring inventory


system performance
Suppose a companys new annual report
claims their costs of goods sold for the year
is $160 million and their total average
inventory (production materials + work-inprocess) is worth $35 million. This
company normally has an inventory turn
ratio of 10. What is this years Inventory
Turnover ratio? What does it mean?
11

Example of measuring inventory system


performance (Continued)
Cost of goods sold
Inventory turnover
Average aggregate inventory value
= $160/$35
= 4.57
Since the companys normal inventory turnover ratio is
10, a drop to 4.57 means that the inventory is not
turning over as quickly as it had in the past.
Without knowing the industry average of turns for
this company it is not possible to comment on how
they are competitively doing in the industry, but
they now have more inventory relative to their cost
of goods sold than before.

Determining inventory system


performance

Fill rate: to capture the benefits of having


inventory, some companies use customer service
to asses their inventory system performance.
The percentage of units immediately available
when requested by customers.

13

Priorities for Inventory


Management: The ABC Analysis

Classifying inventory according to some measure of


importance and allocating control efforts accordingly.
A items
15-20% of items that account for 75-80% of annual
inventory value, should be subject to the tightest
control.
B items
30-40% of items that account for 15% of annual
inventory value
C items
40-50% of items that account for 10-15% of annual
inventory value
14

ABC Inventory Categories

15

The Economic Order


Quantity (EOQ)

16

Economic Order Quantity


Assumptions
1. Demand rate is constant
2. No constraints on lot size
3. Only relevant costs are holding and
ordering/setup
4. Decisions for items are independent
from other items
5. No uncertainty in lead time or supply
17

When to use EOQ

Dont use; if you use the make-to-order


strategy
Modify it; if significant quantity discounts are
given for ordering larger lots
Use it; if you follow a make-to-stock strategy
(stable demand)

18

Economic Order Quantity


On-hand inventory (units)

Receive
order

Inventory depletion
(demand rate)

Average
cycle
inventory

1 cycle

Time
19

Economic Order Quantity


Annual cost (dollars)

Total cost = HC + OC

Holding cost (HC)


Ordering cost (OC)

Lot Size (Q)


20

Economic Order Quantity


Annual cost (dollars)

3000

Total cost =

Q
D
(H) +
(S)
2
Q

2000

Holding cost =

Q
(H)
2

1000

Ordering cost =
0

|
50

|
100

|
150

|
200

|
250

|
300

|
350

D
(S)
Q

|
400

Lot Size (Q)


21

Basic Economic-Order Quantity (EOQ)


Model Formula
Annual
Annual
Total cost = carrying + ordering
cost
cost
TC =

Q
H
2

DS
Q

TC=Total annual
cost
D =Demand
C =Cost per unit
Q =Order quantity
S =Cost of placing
an order or setup
cost
R =Reorder point
L =Lead time
H=Annual holding
and storage cost
per unit of inventory

22

Economic Order Quantity


Annual cost (dollars)

3000

Total cost =
2000 Bird

Q
D
(H) +
(S)
2
Q

feeder costs

D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units


H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = 1000
$45
Q = 390 units
Q
D
C=
(H) +
(S)
2
Q
0

Holding cost =

Q
(H)
2

Ordering cost =
|

C = $2925
+ $108 =150
$3033
50 100
200

|
250

|
300

|
350

D
(S)
Q

|
400

Lot Size (Q)


23

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost

Annual cost (dollars)

3000

Total cost =
2000 Bird

Q
D
(H) +
(S)
2
Q

feeder costs

D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units


H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = 1000
$45
Q = 390 units
Q
D
C=
(H) +
(S)
2
Q
0

Holding cost =

Q
(H)
2

Ordering cost =
|

C = $2925
+ $108 =150
$3033
50 100
200

|
250

Lot Size (Q)

|
300

|
350

D
(S)
Q

|
400

Current
Q

24

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost

Annual cost (dollars)

3000

Total cost =
2000 Bird

Q
D
(H) +
(S)
2
Q

feeder costs

D = (18 /week)(52 weeks) = 936 units


H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15
S = 1000
$45
Q = 468 units
Q
D
C=
(H) +
(S)
2
Q
0

Holding cost =

Q
(H)
2

Ordering cost =
|

C = $3510
+ $90 = 150
$3600200
50 100

|
250

Lot Size (Q)

|
300

|
350

D
(S)
Q

|
400

Current
Q

25

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost

Bird feeder costs

Annual cost (dollars)

3000

Q
D
Total cost = D(H)
+ /week)(52
(S)
=
(18
weeks) = 936 units
2
Q

H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15


S = $45
Q = EOQ

2000

EOQ =

Q
Holding
cost
=
Q
D(H)
2DS
2
C=
(H) +
(S)

1000

Ordering cost =
0

|
50

|
100

|
150

|
200

|
250

Lot Size (Q)

|
300

|
350

D
(S)
Q

|
400

Current
Q

26

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost

Bird feeder costs

Annual cost (dollars)

3000

Q
D
Total cost = D(H)
+ /week)(52
(S)
=
(18
weeks) = 936 units
2
Q

H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15


S = $45
Q = 75

2000

EOQ =

Q
Holding
cost
=
Q
D(H)
2DS
2
C=
(H) +
(S)

1000

Ordering cost =
0

|
50

|
100

|
150

|
200

|
250

Lot Size (Q)

|
300

|
350

D
(S)
Q

|
400

Current
Q

27

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost

Bird feeder costs

Annual cost (dollars)

3000

Q
D
Total cost = D(H)
+ /week)(52
(S)
=
(18
weeks) = 936 units
2
Q

H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15


S = $45
Q = 75

2000

EOQ =
1000

Q
Holding
cost
=
Q
D(H)
2DS
2
C=
(H) +
(S)

C = $562 + $562 = $1124


Ordering cost =

|
50

|
100

|
150

|
200

|
250

Lot Size (Q)

|
300

|
350

D
(S)
Q

|
400

Current
Q

28

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost

Bird feeder costs

Annual cost (dollars)

3000

Q
D
Total cost = D(H)
+ /week)(52
(S)
=
(18
weeks) = 936 units
2
Q

H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15


S = $45
Q = 75

2000

EOQ =
1000

Q
Holding
cost
=
Q
D(H)
2DS
2
C=
(H) +
(S)

C = $562 + $562 = $1124


Ordering cost =

Lowest
cost
0

|
50

Best Q
(EOQ)

|
100

|
150

|
200

|
250

Lot Size (Q)

|
300

|
350

D
(S)
Q

|
400

Current
Q

29

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost

Bird feeder costs

Annual cost (dollars)

3000

Q
D
Total cost = D(H)
+ /week)(52
(S)
=
(18
weeks) = 936 units
2
Q

H = 0.25 ($60/unit) = $15


S = $45
Q = 75

2000

EOQ =
1000

Q
Holding
cost
=
Q
D(H)
2DS
2
C=
(H) +
(S)

C = $562 + $562 = $1124


Ordering cost =

Lowest
cost
0

|
50

Best Q
(EOQ)

|
100

|
150

|
200

|
250

Lot Size (Q)

|
300

|
350

D
(S)
Q

|
400

Current
Q

30

Economic Order Quantity


Current
cost

Annual cost (dollars)

3000

2000

Bird feeder costs


Time between orders
Q
D
Total cost = D(H)
+ /week)(52
(S)
= (18
weeks) = 936 units
2
Q
EOQ = $15
HTBO
= 0.25 ($60/unit)
=
= 75/936 = 0.080 year
EOQ
D
S = $45
Q = 75
Q
Holding
cost
=
Q
D(H)
2DS
TBO
=
(75/936)(12)
=
0.96
months
2
C=
(H) +
(S)
EOQ =EOQ

2
Q
H
TBOEOQ = (75/936)(52) = 4.17 weeks
C = $562 + $562 = $1124
D days
TBOEOQ = (75/936)(365)
= 29.25
Ordering cost =
(S)

1000

Lowest
cost

|
50

Best Q
(EOQ)

|
100

|
150

|
200

|
250

Lot Size (Q)

|
300

|
350

|
400

Current
Q

31

EOQ Example (1) Problem Data


Given the information below, what are the EOQ and
reorder point?

Annual Demand = 1,000 units


Days per year considered in average
daily demand = 365
Cost to place an order = $10
Holding cost per unit per year = $2.50
Lead time = 7 days
Cost per unit = $15

EOQ Example (1) Solution


Q O PT =

d =

2D S
=
H

2(1,000 )(10)
= 89.443 units or 90 units
2.50

1,000 units / year


= 2.74 units / day
365 days / year
_

R eorder point, R = d L = 2.74units / day (7days) = 19.18 or 20 units

In summary, you place an optimal order of 90 units. In


the course of using the units to meet demand, when
you only have 20 units left, place the next order of 90
units.

EOQ Example (2)

Given:
25,000 annual demand
$3 per unit per year holding cost
$100 ordering costs

2(25,000)(100)
EOQ =
1291
3
34

Independent vs. Dependent Demand


Independent Demand (Demand for the final endproduct or demand not related to other items)

Finished
product

E(1
)

Component parts

Dependent
Demand
(Derived demand
items for
component
parts,
subassemblies,
raw materials,
etc)

Decisions in Inventory
Management
Only two decisions need to be made in managing
independent-demand inventories:

When to order? (timing)

How much to order? (size)

36

Routine inventory decisions

These two decisions can be made routinely by using


any one of four inventory control decision rules in
figure below:
Order quantity
Order
frequency

Fixed Q

Variable S

Variable R

Q, R

S, R

Fixed T

Q, T

S, T

Q, order a fixed quantity Q


S, order up to a fixed expected opening inventory quantity S
R, place an order when the inventory balance drops to R
T, place an order every T periods
37

How
Much?
When!
38

Types of Inventory Management


Systems

Continuous review (Reorder point) systems


time between orders varies
constant order quantity

Periodic review systems


time between orders fixed
order quantity varies

Material requirements planning (MRP)

dependent demand items


39

Continuous Review (Reorder point


system)

Reorder point: whenever the inventory on hand reaches the


predetermined inventory level-the reorder point- an order
may be placed for a prespecified amount if there are no
current outstanding orders.
Order quantity is fixed, and the reorder period varies.
Lead time: the time between placement of an order and
receipt of the shipment.
The quantity of inventory to be ordered is often based on
economic order quantity (one answer to the question how
much to order). It can be also based on a price-break
quantity, or a container size (such as a truckload).
40

Continuous Review Systems

Two-bin system: much-used variation of the


reorder point system. Parts are stored in two binsone large and one small.
Small bin- holds sufficient parts to satisfy the
demand.
Large bin- parts are used from only the large bin,
until it is empty.
Advantage-inventory need not be continually
recounted to determine whether or not a reorder
should be placed.
41

Continuous Review Systems

Perpetual inventory system: System that keeps


track of removals from inventory continuously,
thus monitoring current levels of each item.
Requires either a manual card system or a
computerized system to keep track of daily
usage and daily stock levels.
A reorder point system could not adequately perform
without either a two-bin system or perpetual inventory
system.
42

Continuous Review Systems

Continuous review system tracks the remaining


inventory of an item each time a withdrawal is
made to determine whether it is time to reorder.
At each review, a decision is made about an
items inventory position (IP).
Inventory position (IP)=On-hand inventory
(OH)+ scheduled receipts (open orders) (SR)backorders (BO)
43

Continuous Review (Reorder


point system)
IP

On-hand inventory

IP
Order
received

Order
received

Order
received

Order
received

OH

OH

IP

OH

R
Order
placed

Order
placed
L

TBO

Order
placed
L

TBO

Time

TBO
44

Example

Demand for chicken soup at a supermarket is


always 25 cases a day and the lead time is always
four days. The shelves were just restocked with
chicken soup, leaving an on-hand inventory of
only 10 cases. There are no backorders, but there
is one open order for 200 cases. What is the
inventory position? Should a new order be
placed?
45

Continuous Review
IP

On-hand inventory

IP
Order
received

Order
received

IP
Order
received

Order
received

Chicken Soup
Q

R = Average demand during lead time


OH = (25)(4) = 100
OH cases

OH

IP = OH + SR BO
Order
Order
=
10
+
200

0
= 210 cases
placed
placed

Order
placed
L
TBO

L
TBO

Time

TBO
46

Uncertain Demand
IP
Order
received

Order
received

On-hand inventory

IP
Order
received

Order
received
Q

Q
OH

L1
TBO1

Order
placed

Order
placed

Order
placed

L2
TBO2

L3

Time

TBO3
47

Reorder Point / Safety Stock

Because of uncertain demand, sales during lead time


are unpredictable, and safety stock is added to hedge
against lost sales.
Deciding on a small or large safety stock is a trade-off
between customer service and inventory holding costs.
The usual approach for determining R is for
management is to set a reasonable service level policy for
the inventory and then determine the safety stock level
that satisfies this policy.
Service level is the desired probability of not running out
of stock in any one ordering cycle, which begins at the
time an order is placed and ends when it arrives in
48
stock.

Reorder Point / Safety Stock

z=the number of standard deviations


for a specified service probability
L=standard deviation of demand during lead time

Cycle-service level = 85%

Probability of stockout
(1.0 0.85 = 0.15)
Average
demand
during
lead time

R
zL
49

Example

Records show that the demand for


dishwasher detergent during lead time is
normally distributed, with an average of 250
boxes and L=22. What safety stock should
be carried for a 99 percent cycle-service
level? What is R?

50

Reorder Point / Safety Stock


Safety Stock/R
Cycle-service level = 85%
Safety stock = zL
= 2.33(22) = 51.3
= 51 boxes
Probability of stockout
Reorder point = (1.0
ADDLT
+ SS
0.85
= 0.15)
= 250 + 51
Average
= 301 boxes
demand
during
lead time
R
zL
51

Reorder Point / Safety Stock

Sometimes average demand during lead time and the


standard deviation of demand during lead time are not
directly available.
Average demand may be known along with standard
deviation of demand, t, over some time interval t (days
or weeks), where t does not equal the lead time. In that
case standard deviation of demand during lead time can
be found as:
t= t 2 L= t L
52

Lead Time Distributions


t = 15

t = 26

+
75
Demand for week 1

t = 15

+
75
Demand for week 2

t = 15

225
Demand for
three-week lead time

=
75
Demand for week 3

53

Lead Time Distributions


t = 15

t = 26

Bird feeder Lead Time Distribution

t = 1 week

d = 18

75
Demand for weekService-level=90%
1

t=5

L=2

t = 15

L = t

L =5

= 7.1

Safety stock = zL = 1.28(7.1) = 9.1 or 9 units

225
Demand for
stock
three-week lead time

75

Reorder
point
= dL + Safety
Demand
for week
2
t = 15+ 9 = 45 units
= 2(18)

=
75
Demand for week 3

54

Calculating Total Q Systems Costs

Total cost=Annual inventory holding cost +


annual ordering cost +annual safety stock
holding cost

55

Lead Time Distributions


t = 15

t = 26

+
75
Demand for week 1

Bird feeder Lead Time Distribution


t = 1 week
t = 15

d = 18
L=2
Reorder point = 2(18) + 9 = 45 units

225
75
936
C=
($15) +
($45)
+ 9($15)
Demand
for
2
75 three-week
lead time

75
Demand for week 2

t = 15

C = $562.50 + $561.60 + $135 = $1259.10

=
75
Demand for week 3

56

Periodic Review System

Inventory level is reviewed at equal time


intervals, and at each review a reorder may be
placed to bring the level up to a desired quantity.
Appropriate for retailers ordering families of
goods.

57

Periodic Review System Without


Considering On-Order Quantity

58

Periodic Review System

Review period (therefore the reorder period) is


fixed, and the order quantity varies.
Since inventory is not continuously tracked,
there is a significant chance of stocking out.
This possibility can be avoided by using safety
stock.

59

Periodic Review System (Assumes


None On Order at Time of Reorder)

Source: Meredith and Shafer, Operations Management for MBAs, Wiley, 2nd edition, 2002; Chase, Jacobs, Aquilano, Operations Management for
Competitive Advantage, Mc-Graw Hill 2004; J. Krajewski, Larry P Ritzman, and Manoj K. Malhotra, Operations Management: Process and Value
Chains, Seventh Edition, Prentice Hall, 2005.

60

Supplement D
Special Inventory (Price-Break) Models
Based on the same assumptions as the EOQ model,
the price-break model has a similar Qopt formula:

2DS
2(Annual Demand)(Order or Setup Cost)
QOPT =
=
iC
Annual Holding Cost
i = percentage of unit cost attributed to carrying inventory
C = cost per unit
Since C changes for each price-break, the formula
above will have to be used with each price-break cost
value

Total Costs with Purchasing Cost


Annual
Annual
Purchasing
+
TC = carrying + ordering cost
cost
cost
Q
H
TC =
2

DS
Q

DC

The buyers goal with quantity discounts (price breaks)


is to select the order quantity that will minimize total
cost, where total cost is the sum of carrying cost,
ordering cost, and purchasing cost.
62

Price-Break Example Problem Data


A company has a chance to reduce their inventory
ordering costs by placing larger quantity orders using
the price-break order quantity schedule below. What
should their optimal order quantity be if this company
purchases this single inventory item with an e-mail
ordering cost of $4, a carrying cost rate of 2% of the
inventory cost of the item, and an annual demand of
10,000 units?
Order Quantity(units) Price/unit($)
0 to 2,499
$1.20
2,500 to 3,999 1.00
4,000 or more .98

Price-Break Example Solution


First, find Q for each price, starting with the lowest price, until
you locate a feasible minimum point.
Annual Demand (D)= 10,000 units
Cost to place an order (S)= $4

Carrying cost % of total cost (i)= 2%


Cost per unit (C) = $1.20, $1.00, $0.98

Interval from 4000 & more, the


QOPT =
Qopt value is not feasible

2DS
=
iC

2(10,000)(4)
= 2,020 units
0.02(0.98)

Interval from 2500-3999, the


Qopt value is not feasible

QOPT =

2DS
=
iC

2(10,000)(4)
= 2,000 units
0.02(1.00)

Q OPT =

2DS
=
iC

2(10,000)(4)
= 1,826 units
0.02(1.20)

Interval from 0 to 2499, the


Qopt value is feasible

Price-Break Example Solution


Next, we plug the Qopt value into the total cost annual
cost function to determine the total cost for 1826, and
compare it to the total cost of the minimum quantity
necessary to obtain the minimum price of .98

D
Q
TC = DC +
S+
iC
Q
2
TC(0-2499)=(10000*1.20)+(10000/1826)*4+(1826/2)(0.02*1.20)
= $12,043.82
TC(4000&more)= $9,949.20

Finally, we select the least costly Qopt, which is this


problem occurs in the 4000 & more interval. In summary,
our optimal order quantity is 4000 units

Procedure for Price-Break Models

Beginning with the lowest unit price, compete the Q for


each price range until you find a feasible Q.
If the Q for the lowest unit price is feasible, it is the
optimal order quantity.
If the Q is not feasible in the lowest price range,
compare the total cost of feasible Q/Qs with the total
cost of the minimum quantity in the lowest price range.

66

Вам также может понравиться