Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Michal Mrnka, Student Member, IEEE and Zbynek Raida, Senior Member, IEEE
AbstractThe combination of two higher order hybrid electromagnetic modes (HEM133 and HEM123) in a simple cylindrical
dielectric resonator is exploited in the presented paper to enhance
antenna gain. Both modes were excited by the same feeding aperture in the ground plane of a microstrip line. A linearly polarized,
broadside radiation pattern with maximum realized gain of
about 11.6 dBi was successfully obtained. The antenna was designed for the ISM band with central frequency 5.8 GHz and
relative bandwidth at least 2.6 %. For fabrication, we used a
layered Arlon AR600 substrate of relative permittivity 6.15.
Experimental results showed reasonable agreement with
simulations and validated the new concept of the high gain
dielectric resonator antenna.
Index TermsDielectric resonator
antennas, higher order radiating modes.
antennas,
directive
I. INTRODUCTION
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
the ground plane of a microstrip line according to Fig. 1.
An aperture coupling feeding mechanism was selected to
minimize excitation of unwanted lower-order modes in the
structure. Relative permittivity of the resonator in all
simulations was 6.15. This value was simply selected due to
availability of the material with the given r. The substrate
Arlon 25N with relative permittivity 3.38 was used in the
feeding structure design.
Initial dimensions of the resonator (height h and diameter d
according to Fig. 3) were found by the magnetic wall method
using CST Eigenmode solver. All the walls were perfect
magnetic conductors and the resonator dimensions were
obtained so that the resonant frequency of both the target
modes HEM133, and HEM123 lied close to the desired frequency
5.8 GHz. Since the magnetic wall method does not take
radiation losses of the resonator into account, considerably
large inaccuracy is a result. Nevertheless, the method provided
a reasonable initial approximation of dimensions that needed
to be tuned and optimized afterwards. Full-wave transient
solver of CST Microwave Studio was used for this purpose.
Fig. 2c depicts the simulated electric-field distribution of
the desired mode combination on the top wall of the resonator.
The E-field oscillates predominantly in the x-axis and thus the
radiation is linearly polarized in the broadside direction (the
direction along the z-axis). Fig. 2a and 2b show cross sectional
views of the E-field distribution in two different planes of the
resonator according to Fig. 2c. Presence of the desired modes
is evident in these cross sections. A relatively high gain
radiator with radiation efficiency above 90 % can be obtained
by carefully optimizing the resonator size, dimensions of the
aperture feed and the ground plane diameter.
0.40
(1)
w 0.2l
(2)
(3)
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
V. CONCLUSION
A new concept of a dielectric resonator antenna based on
the combination of higher-order modes in a simple cylindrical
dielectric resonator was presented and experimentally verified.
Good agreement between simulation and measurement was
achieved. A directive radiation pattern with a high gain of
11.59 dBi was measured and impedance bandwidth was
sufficient to cover the whole 5.8 GHz ISM band. Relatively
high side lobe levels in the E-plane (8 dB below the gain in the
broadside direction) are the main disadvantage.
The implementation of the antenna might be more
convenient at higher frequencies where dimensions are less
crucial. Since the structure operates with higher-order modes,
the electrical size is increased when compared to the operation
of low-order modes. Further miniaturization might be possible
using higher permittivity materials, which was not attempted
in this letter.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
Fig.8. Realized gain frequency response in the broadside
direction
simulation
vs.
measurement.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
[10]
[11]
[12]