Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Krass, SoH
Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine
ORDER
1. All papers received from E. J. Krass are to be packed up and returned to E. J. Krass as soon
as possible.
2. As well, the funds received for filing the Writ of Summons - $ 204.00 and the 3 Summary
Motions - (3 x $ 62 = $ 186.00) are to be returned forthwith to E. J. Krass, the Petitioner on this file.
3. The reason for these actions is that, according to the Constitutional Questions Act, the
supreme court of british columbia has no jurisdiction over constitutional matters. The only
current court with the authority to hear and preside over constitutional Petitions to the Courts,
according to s. 24 (1) and s. 7 of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, is the Supreme Court of
Canada in Ottawa.
4. Therefore, all papers, filed by the petitioner, E. J. Krass on this file with the exception of
this Order, must be returned to the petitioner so that he can use these documents in the filing of the
Petition to the Court on these constitutional matters with the Supreme Court of Canada as well as
the striking down of s. 40 of the Supreme Court Act of Canada.
5. All papers will be packed up and made available for pickup by E. J. Krass within as short
a time frame as possible funds for pickup along with his remittance given that 15 months were
wasted before the supreme court of british columbia - kelowna.
6. S. 1 of the Writ of Summons filed January 9, 2009 on this file specifically mentioned that
this was a constitutional matter which automatically made the January 9, 2009 Writ of Summons
redundant and useless because the matters in the petition were already known to the administrators
of Canada and must be dealt with at the Supreme Court of Canada.
___________________________________ _______________________________________
Registrar
Contents
Section
1 Lieutenant Governor in Council to refer matters to court
2 Court to certify opinion
3 Notice to Attorney General of Canada
4 Notice of reference
5 Notice to persons interested
6 Appeal
7 Publication in Gazette
8 Notice of questions of validity or applicability
9 Action for declaration of validity of Act
1 The Lieutenant Governor in Council may refer any matter to the Court of
Appeal or to the Supreme Court for hearing and consideration, and the Court
of Appeal or the Supreme Court must then hear and consider it.
2 (1) The Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court must give to the Lieutenant
Governor in Council its opinion on the matter referred, with reasons, in the
manner of a judgment in an ordinary action.
(2) A justice of the Court of Appeal who differs from the opinion of the
majority may give to the Lieutenant Governor in Council the justice's opinion,
with reasons.
3 In case the matter referred relates to the constitutional validity of all or part of
an Act, the Attorney General of Canada must be notified of the hearing, and
must be heard if the Attorney General of Canada sees fit.
1 of 3 03/05/2010 6:51 PM
Constitutional Question Act http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/0...
Notice of reference
5 The Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court may direct that a person interested,
or, if there is a class of persons interested, any one or more persons as
representatives of that class, must be notified of the hearing, and those
persons are entitled to be heard.
Appeal
6 The opinion of the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court is a judgment of the
Court of Appeal or of the Supreme Court, as the case may be, and an appeal
lies from it in the manner of a judgment in an ordinary action.
Publication in Gazette
7 The reasons given by the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court under this Act
must, as soon as practicable, be published in the Gazette.
2 of 3 03/05/2010 6:51 PM
Constitutional Question Act http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/0...
9 (1) The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to entertain an action at the instance
of either the Attorney General of Canada or the Attorney General of British
Columbia for a declaration as to the validity of an Act of the Legislature,
though no further relief is sought.
(2) The action is sufficiently constituted if the 2 Attorneys General are parties.
(3) An appeal lies from the judgment in the manner of a judgment in an
ordinary action.
3 of 3 03/05/2010 6:51 PM