Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The court shall sentence the accused to an indeterminate sentence, the MAXIMUM
TERM of which shall not exceed the maximum fixed by said law and the minimum
shall not be less than the MINIMUM TERM prescribed by the same. (Q11, 1994 Bar)
Example: Penalty is one year to 5 years. Indeterminate sentence may be one year
to 3 years or 3 years to 5 years.
This act shall not apply to persons:
1. Convicted of offenses punished with death or life imprisonment. (Q12, 1990 Bar)
2. Those convicted of treason, conspiracy or proposal to commit treason, misprision
of treason, rebellion, sedition or espionage, or piracy.
3. Those who are habitual delinquents.
Recidivists are entitled to an indeterminate sentence. (People v. Jaranilla, 28547,
Feb. 22, 1974)
4. Those who shall have escaped from confinement or evaded sentence.
A minor who escaped from confinement in the reformatory is entitled to the benefits
of the law because confinement is not considered imprisonment. (People v. Perez,
44 OG 3884) (Q6, 1991 Bar)
5. Those who having been granted conditional pardon by the President shall have
violated the terms thereof.
6. Those whose maximum period of imprisonment does not exceed one year. (Q8,
1999 Bar)
The application of which is based upon the penalty actually imposed in accordance
with law. (People v. Hidalgo, 452, Jan. 22, 1962)
7. Those already serving final judgment upon the approval of this Act (December 5,
1933).
8. Those sentenced to the penalty of destierro or suspension. (Q12, 1999 Bar)
Whenever any prisoner who shall have served the minimum penalty imposed on
him, said Board of Indeterminate Sentence may, in its discretion, and in accordance
with the rules and regulations adopted thereunder, authorize the release of such
prisoner on parole. If during the period of surveillance, such parolee shall show
himself to be a law-abiding citizen and shall not violate any of the laws of the
Philippines, the Board may issue a final certificate of release in his favor. Whenever
any prisoner released on parole shall, during the period of surveillance, violate
any of the conditions of his parole, the Board may issue an order for his re-arrest
and shall serve the remaining unexpired portion of the maximum sentence.
when taken individually and separately, are within the probationable period. (Q9,
1997 Bar)
2. Convicted of any crime against the national security (treason, espionage, piracy,
etc.) or the public order (rebellion, sedition, direct assault, resistance, etc.).
3. Who have been previously convicted by final judgment of an offense punished by
imprisonment of not less than one month and one day and/or a fine of not less
than P 200. (Q2, 1993 Bar)
4. Who have been once on probation.
5. Who are already serving sentence at the time of the effectivity of the Decree.
Except for the reasons specified by the law, a trial court should not deny a petition
for probation, especially when the probation officer has favorably recommended
the grant of probation.
Even if at the time of conviction the accused was qualified for probation but at the
time of his application for probation, he is no longer qualified, he is not entitled to
probation. The qualification for probation must be determined as of the time the
application is filed in court. (Bernardo v. Judge Balagot, 86561, Nov. 10, 1992)
Supposing, an accused was convicted of a crime for which he was sentenced to a
maximum sentence of 10 years. While affirming the judgment of conviction, the
appellate court reduced the penalty to a maximum of 4 years and 4 months taking
into consideration certain modifying circumstances. The accused now applies for
probation. In this case, the accused is not entitled to probation. The law and
jurisprudence are to the effect that appeal by the accused from a sentence of
conviction forfeits his right to probation. (Bernardo v. Balagot, supra; Francisco v.
CA; De la Cruz v. Judge Callejo) (Q3, 1995 Bar; Q17, 1994 Bar)
sentence originally imposed and shall commit the probationer. The order of the
court is not appealable.
A final discharge of probation shall operate to restore to the probationer all civil
rights lost or suspended as a result of the conviction and to full discharge of his
liability for any fine imposed. Under the Probation Law what is suspended is the
execution of the sentence, while under PD 603, as amended, what is suspended is
the pronouncement of the sentence upon request of the youthful offender. The
suspension of the sentence, however, has no bearing on the civil liability, which is
separate and distinct from the criminal action. (Budlong v. Apalisok, 22 SCRA 935)
The provisions of the Probation Law should be liberally construed in order that the
objective should be realized and achieved. (Santos v. Hon. Pano, 55130, Jan. 17,
1983) In probation, the imposition of the sentence is suspended and likewise its
accessory penalties are likewise suspended. An order placing the defendant on
probation is not a sentence but is rather in effect a suspension of the imposition of
the sentence. It is not a final judgment but is rather an interlocutory judgment in
the nature of the a conditional order placing the convicted defendant under the
supervision of the court for his reformation. (Baclayon v. Hon. Mutia, 129 SCRA 148