Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Company)
Project Plan for
Vietnam Distribution Center
Warehouse Setup
ADJW Company
Project Plan
Ver. Date
0.1
Feb
2009
Prepared by
25, Aj Manuel
Reviewed by
Draft
Project Plan
Table of Contents
1.
Introduction................................................................................................................................................ 3
1.1.
Purpose............................................................................................................................................. 3
1.2.
Scope................................................................................................................................................ 3
1.3.
1.4.
Definitions.......................................................................................................................................... 3
1.5.
References........................................................................................................................................ 3
2.
Project Profile............................................................................................................................................. 3
3.
3.2.
4.
Project Environment.................................................................................................................................. 3
5.
6.
7.
Project Estimation...................................................................................................................................... 3
8.
Resource Plan............................................................................................................................................ 3
9.
8.1.
Hardware........................................................................................................................................... 3
8.2.
Software............................................................................................................................................ 3
8.3.
8.4.
Training Plan...................................................................................................................................... 3
8.5.
Project Organization.................................................................................................................................. 3
9.1.
Project Plan
20.1.4. Effort Slippage or changes in effort................................................................................................... 3
20.1.5. Changes in Risks/Dependenconfiguration itemses...........................................................................3
20.2.
Project Plan
1. Introduction
1.1.
Purpose
This document provides a project plan for the Vietnam Distribution Center Warehouse Setup
1.2.
Scope
Details of this document are only applicable for the Vietnam Distribution Center Warehouse Setup Project.
1.3.
Definition
Third Party Logistics
business Acceptance Testing
business Acceptance Testing Cases/Scenarios and Results
business Acceptance Testing Plan
Configuration Management
Configuration Management Plan
Critical Path Schedule
Customer Satisfaction
Decision Analysis and Resolution
Distribution Center
Enterprise Resource Planning
Full Time Employee
Graphical User Interface
Inventory Management
Local Area Network
Legal Entity
Local Enterprise Model
Matching and Mapping
Minutes of Meeting
Microsoft
Non-conformances
Non-negative Impact
Objectives and Requirements
Project Management Office
Project Management Review
Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance Plan
Release/3
Risk Management Plan
Requirements Traceability Matrix
Systems, Application, and Products
Singapore Time
Systems Integrated Testing
Statement of Work
Single Point of Contact
Software Requirements Specification; Refers to O&R
Sales, Transportation and Cross border
Software Quality Assurance
Unit Test Case
Unit Test Plan
Work breakdown Structure
Warehouse Management
Project Plan
1.4.
Definitions
None.
1.5.
References
Reference Documents
SOW
BAT Plan
business Acceptance Test Defect Tracking Sheet
business Test Cases
business Test Results Document
Configuration Management Plan
Cutover Plan
Data Management Plan
Post-release Defect Tracking Sheet
Quality Management Plan
Risk Management Plan
Tailoring and Waivers Worksheet
Training Plan
Unit Test Cases
Unit Test Defect Tracking Sheet
Unit Test Plan
Unit Test Results Document
2. Project Profile
Project Name
Customer
AJDW Company
Customers Geography
Asia Pacific
ajdw@yahoo.com
Lifecycle Model
SAP Implementation
Cost Estimate
$200,000.00
Technology
SAP R/3
Project Plan
3.1.
3.2.
Organization
Involved
AJDW
A02
AJDW
A03
AJDW
Description
100% Master Data will be ready before Business Acceptance Testing and
will be provided by AJDW.
The local organization is already experienced on SAP/R3 in all the
components, knowledgeable on the SAP business processes and qualified
to run the Business Acceptance tests. There will be no additional effort that
will impact the project timings and cost due to the fact that no Site
Integrated Test will be performed before the Business Acceptance Test, as
required by AJDW.
The current invoice and report layout set will continue to be used and will be
Project Plan
A04
AJDW
A05
AJDW
A06
A07
AJDW
AJDW
A08
AJDW
A09
AJDW
A10
AJDW
A11
AJDW
A12
AJDW
Project Plan
A13
AJDW
A14
AJDW
A15
AJDW
A16
AJDW
A17
AJDW
A18
AJDW
A19
AJDW
A20
AJDW
A21
AJDW
A22
AJDW
A23
A24
AJDW
AJDW
A25
AJDW
A26
AJDW
Project Plan
4. Project Environment
The Vietnam project will be implemented in SAP R/3 4.5 and dually maintained in SAP R/3 6.0. The project will
be using the iGDE standard during implementation.
Deliverables
Delivery date
Phase 1 Kickoff
Kickoff presentation
Transport list
BAT plan
May 5, 2009
Phase 1 BAT
Cutover Plan
Phase 1 Cutover
Phase 2 Kickoff
Kickoff presentation
March 2, 2009
Transport list
BAT plan
September 4, 2009
Phase 2 BAT
Cutover Plan
Phase 2 Cutover
Project Closeout
7. Project Estimation
The project will be divided in two phases, partly running in parallel with each other. Phase 1 will be for three
months, from February 19 to May 22. Phase 2 will be for seven months, starting on March 1 to September 30.
Project Plan
8. Resource Plan
8.1.
8.2.
Hardware
Hardware Description
Configuration/Specification
Quantity
Required
Start
Date
End date
Contact
Service Laptop
Feb 21,
2009
Sept
2009
Administrative
Assistant
30,
Software
Software Description
Version
Start Date
End Date
Contact
SAP R/3
4.5
ERP
SAP GUI
640
AJDW
Center
Call
4.5
AJDW
Center
Call
Vietnam Sharepoint
N/A
Site Champion
N/A
Site Champion
SPRINT Tool
N/A
Site Champion
PMO Library
N/A
PMO Mentor
MS Office
2003
AJDW
Center
Call
Internet Explorer
6.0
AJDW
Center
Call
Email
(Lotus Notes/MS Outlook)
MS Outlook 2003
AJDW
Center
Call
Sametime v3.0
GROUP2
HOLDINGS Call
Center/
AJDW
Call
Center
GROUP2
HOLDINGS Call
Center/
AJDW
Call
Center
Jabber v2.7
Collaboration
(GROUP2
HOLDINGS
Classroom/Netmeeting)
Tools
Virtual
Netmeeting v3.0
GROUP2
HOLDINGS Virtual
Classroom v6.2
Project Plan
8.3.
Tool(s) Planned
Start Date
End Date
Requirements
Engineering
Software
Requirements
Document (SRS)
Testing
SPRINT
Specification
Results
Document
Project Management
-Planning
-Effort tracking
-Defect tracking
-Change Request
Tracking
-Risk Tracking
-Configuration
Mgmt.
Monitoring
Control
-Project
and
Reviews
8.4.
Share point
PM Metrics
SPRINT
Review records
Training Plan
Refer to the Vietnam Training Plan for details.
8.5.
Project Plan
o STX
o MATERIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
o Costing
o Purchasing
o LEM and Master data
IT Row Leaders Phase 2 - WM
o STX
o MATERIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
o Costing
o Purchasing
o OM / AR
o LEM and Master data
9. Project Organization
AJDW Escalation
Manager
AJDW
GROUP2 HOLDINGS
Escalation Manager
GROUP2 HOLDINGS
Project SPOC
AJDW
Project Manager
GROUP2 HOLDINGS
GROUP2 HOLDINGS
Product Manager/Product
Focus Team
AJDW BE
9.1.
IT Row Leaders
GROUP2 HOLDINGS
Responsibilities
Be the single point of contact for AJDW SPOC.
Manages and controls the execution of the project activities based on
agreed project CPS(critical path schedule).
Leads the change control board that evaluates and approves change
requests to the project.
Sets project metrics and goals and uses the metrics to control the
project.
Responsible for ensuring deliverables that were agreed between AJDW
Project Plan
Configuration Controller
Communicating
improvement areas, and best practices.
issues,
identifying
process
Responsible for coordinating touch points and other activities with other
rows
Responsible for delivering and documenting the solution set (systems
and work processes) for their row, ensuring that requirements are fully
addressed.
Ensures that all open issues are closed for each phase of the project for
their row.
Ensures that configurations within their row are ready for integration,
release, and/or migration, from one phase to another based on the
project timeline and the project test plans.
Raises issues/risks to project manager if unresolved at the row-level
Provide technical consultation and direction for implementation team
SERVICE MANAGEMENT
SPOC
IT Row Leaders
Project Plan
BE
10.
None.
Project Plan
11.
Stakeholders
Dependency Description
AJDW business
SPOC
AJDW business
SPOC
AJDW business
SPOC
AJDW business
SPOC
AJDW business
SPOC/
AJDW
Escalation
Manager
AJDW
Escalation
Manager
Lifecycle
Phase
Matching and
Mapping
Matching and
Mapping
business
Acceptance
Test
Preparation
business
Acceptance
Test
business
Acceptance
Test
M&M
BAT
AJDW business
SPOC
AJDW
Escalation
Cutover
Cutover
All phases
Required by (Date)
Project Plan
Manager
AJDW
Escalation
Manager
AJDW business
SPOC
AJDW
Escalation
Manager
AJDW business
SPOC
AJDW
Escalation
Manager
12.
AJDW
Project
SPOC
and
GROUP2
HOLDINGS PM will confirm impacts from other
projects before Design & Construction is
completed.
Standard SAP-IM solution for Phase 1 and
SAP-WM solution for Phase 2 will be
implemented. AJDW will be responsible for
internal controls & SOX compliance.
AJDW will be responsible for development
and/or implementation of EAPs and DRPs.
Key Users and Key End Users roles will be
staffed by AJDW. AJDW Key Users will be
available at the time the project starts
AJDW
will
coordinate and lead all
communications with 3rd Party Logistics
service supplier, if any. No new interface with
3rd Party Logistics systems will be designed.
AJDW will ensure the availability of the
resources that are funded via staff
augmentation and flex pool.
All phases
All phases
All phases
All phases
All phases
Risk Management
Refer to the Vietnam Risk Management Plan for details. Below are the major highlights.
Identified Risks
Requirements
Unstable
Inadequate
Experience
Team
Inadequate
Documents
Input
13.
Risk Elaboration
Changes
in
the
requirements could lead
to
changes
in
the
schedule, depending on
the extent of the change
Project team members
are either inexperienced
or has limited experience
in their assigned row
Retrain resources
Some
key
input
documents are provided
for by the customer.
Align requirements
expected with the
customers early on
Change Management
Refer to the Vietnam Configuration Management Plan under the change control section. For all change
requests executed as part of the Vietnam Project, these are logged into the Vietnam Change Request
Template. Also refer to the PMO(project management office) Change Management Process.
14.
Configuration Management
15.
Communication Plan
Method
Team Meeting
Frequency
Weekly
Participants
Owner:
Ouput
Meeting minutes
Project Plan
Mondays
4:30 5:30 PM
SGT
Audio
conference/
Email
Monthly
GROUP2
HOLDINGS Project
Management
Review
AJDW
Project
Management
Review
Monthly
Senior
Management
Review
Quarterly
Update on project
Next
steps
resolution
Project
Reports
Project
Report
16.
Status
Closure
PM
Mandatory Participants:
Project Team
Owner:
PM
Mandatory Participants:
PM and all GROUP2
HOLDINGS
IT
team
members
Owner:
PM
Mandatory Participants:
PM, AJDW SPOC, AJDW
team members, AJDW
Escalation Manager
Owner:
PM
Mandatory Participants:
PM, Senior Manager, Site
Champions
Owner:
PM
Sent to:
AJDW
Project
SPOC,
AJDW Escalation Manager
Meeting
minutes,
PMR
slides
(project
status),
emails
Owner:
PM
Mandatory Participants:
Senior Manager, Project
Team, Project board
Meeting
minutes,
PMR
slides
(project
status),
emails
SERVICE MANAGEMENTR
slides
Project
emails
Status
Reports,
17.
18.
Type
Project
Review
Progress
Project Management
Review
Frequency
Owner
Participants /Audience
Weekly
Project Manager
Project Team
Project Manager
Project Team
Project Plan
Type
Frequency
Owner
Participants /Audience
Senior Management
Review
Quarterly
Project Manager
Senior Manager
Project Team
Site Champion
Project
Reporting
Closure
Project Manager
Senior Manager
Project Team
Site Champion
Escalation Meetings
19.
As Needed
Project Manager
Data Management
20.
Quality Management
20.1.1.
Changes in Scope
20.1.2.
20.1.3.
20.1.4.
Effort spent in a phase deviates from the estimated effort then projects need to deliberate if re-planning
is necessary based on current project status.
Project Plan
20.1.5.
Changes in Risks/Dependencies
21.
N/A.
22.
Refer to the Vietnam Tailoring and Waivers Worksheet for more details.
23.
None.
24.
User Documentation
Standard Operating Procedures to be used by the Vietnam Key Users will be created and maintained by the
AJDW be.
25.
Installation Plan
26.
Warranty Support
The solution will be turned over to Service Management for second level support after the verification period.
Third level support will be handled by each rows Product Focus Team member.
27.
A formal Decision Analysis and Resolution process is not required for all decision -making scenarios. A formal
DAR can be used based on the impact of the decision. The impact of the decision has to be decided by the
relevant stakeholders based on the following criteria:
1. The decision is directly related to topics assessed as high or medium risk or would cause direct schedule
delays or cost/effort overrun
2. The decision affects work commitments or assignments
3. The decision affects the ability to achieve the project objectives
4. The decision has widespread impact on the organization
5. The decision affects the deliverables
6. The decision affects career opportunities
7. The decision affects dependencies with other individuals or workgroups
8. The decision affects the work environment
9. The decision affects significant stakeholders who are not involved in the decision process
The impact of the decision can be rated as High, Medium or Low based on the above-mentioned criteria.
The need for a formal DAR is decided based on the impact.
Recommendation
Impact
Recommendation
High
Project Plan
Impact
Recommendation
Medium
Project or the relevant stakeholders will decide whether to follow formal DAR Process or not
based on the other related impacts
Low
28.
All issues will be logged in the Defect Tracking Sheet. Each issue will be assigned a resolution owner and will
be updated as per the resolution owners update, normally done during the Status Meeting. Each issue will be
set to In-progress as a default status and will be assigned a severity (High, Medium, Low) to determine the
impact to the project. Once resolved, the status will be set to Closed and will no longer be tracked.