Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Crop geometry
Crop production aims at efficient harvest of solar energy, which in turn
depends upon the efficiency of light interception and its utilization.
Higher
efficiency of light interception could be achieved through rapid development of leaf
area index (LAI) and maintaining the optimum LAI for a longer duration. Plant
population and crop geometry play a dominant roleon LAI and light interception.
Plant population defines the size of area available to individual plants or the number
of plants per unit area, whereas crop geometry refers to the shape of area available
for individual plants or the pattern of distribution of plants over the ground.
2.1.
Cane yield is a function of the stalk population per unit area (number of
millable canes) and single cane weight. The number of millable canes and cane
weight could be improved by providing optimum conditions for plant growth. Closer
spacings generate a higher plant population at the initial stages but the tiller
mortality is also high as a consequence of within-row shading. However, under
closer spacing, there is an increase in the stalk population resulting in higher cane
yield. Varieties widely differ in their response to row spacing. Early and short
duration varieties generally perform well under closer spacing while late varieties
require wider spacing.
Generally optimum inter row distance depends up on the tillering capacity of
the variety, time of planting, fertility status of the soil and stress conditions like
drought. Closer row spacings are adopted under low soil fertility status, shy tillering
varieties, delayed planting, cooler and slower growing conditions and drought. For
high biomass yield, narrow row spacing has been found to be advantageous. The
drawbacks of narrower spacing are the high cost of seed cane and difficulties in
carrying out cultural operations and harvesting. Closer row spacing also results in
quicker close in of the canopy and may suppress the production of late tillers.
While closer row spacing of 75 - 100 cm is common in India, wider spacing is
adopted in countries like Australia, Brazil, Mauritius and South Africa.In areas where
mechanized cultivation is practiced, the row spacing is wider (> 1.2 m) while
narrower row spacings (0.6 m - 1.2 m) are adopted in countries where human labour
is extensively used for the cultivation of sugarcane.
2.2
reduced substantially. Several studies have indicated that cane yield could be
maintained under the paired row system. Experiments conducted at Sugarcane
Breeding Institute, Coimbatore during 1988 - 90 have shown that the cane yield in
60/120 cm paired row was comparable with that under 90 cm uniform rows. In a
study conducted at Sameerwadi (Karnataka) there was no significant difference in
cane yield between normal row spacing (90 cm) and paired row spacing which
recorded 101.1 and 102.5 t/ha respectively in the variety, CoC 671. This system
also provides scope for raising intercrops in the larger space in between pairs of
rows. Several modifications of 90 cm row spacing have been studied in India, so as
to have a wider inter-row space alternated with a narrow interspace like 60/120,
50/130, 40/140, 30/150 cm etc. to accommodate an intercrop in the wider inter-row
space. In such modifications, the row length per unit land area and the requirement
of seed cane remains constant and the yields obtained are also comparable.
2.3
that these do not change between the two situations as the yields obtained are
comparable.
Varieties: Varietal selection plays a pivotal role in the success of wide row spacing.
Significant variety x spacing interactions and differences in the response of
sugarcane varieties to row spacing has been reported.
Among the varietal
characters, high tillering capacity, synchrony in tillering, fan shaped growth pattern,
non-lodging nature, higher cane number and higher single cane weight are
important for wide rows. In an experiment at Coimbatore with three varieties,
variety x spacing interaction was found significant for stalk population, cane yield
and CCS yield. The variety Co 91010 recorded similar cane yield at 90 cm, 120 cm
and 150 cm (dual rows) row spacings, whereas in the other two varieties (Co 94005
and Co 94008) the cane yield was the highest at 90 cm row spacing and decreased
with increase in row spacing. The sugarcane variety Co 86032 performs well over a
range of row spacings including 150 cm wide rows.
Seed rate: A seed rate of 75,000 two budded setts/ha, which works out to 6.75
setts per metre length of row, is being adopted for sugarcane under the normal row
spacing of 90 cm. It has been well established that tiller mortality is substantially
lower and a higher percentage of shoots survive to become millable canes under
wide rows. Increase in the average weight of cane at wide row spacing has also
been observed in several experiments. Hence, it may not be necessary to increase
the seed rate to 11.25 setts per metre row to maintain the seed rate of 75,000 setts
per hectare. In an experiment conducted at Sugarcane Breeding Institute cane
yield in the sugarcane variety Co 86032 under wide row spacing (150 cm row
spacing and 60,000 setts/ha) and normal row spacing (90 cm row spacing and
75,000 setts/ha was almost the same, 119.1 t/ha under wide row and 119.8 t/ha
under normal row.
Planting pattern: Among the different methods of sett placement, dual row
planting has been found to be superior. In this method, broad furrows are formed
at a spacing of 150 cm and in the middle of the furrows sugarcane setts are planted
in two rows adopting a spacing of 25 - 30 cm between them. In a comparative
study of two different methods of wide row planting, the dual row system gave
higher cane yield compared to the single row system and normal 90 cm row spacing