PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRE P A LE CENTRE POUR LA DEFENSE DE L'INTERET PUBLIC ie\icnunceeticomenes ONE Nicholas Street, Suite 1204, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 7B7 30 June 2016 Ms, Danielle May-Cuconato Secretary General Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Ottawa, ON K1A ON2 VIA GCKEY Dear Ms. May-Cuconato, Commission File number: 8663-C12-201503186 Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2015-134 (as amended) “Review of basic telecommunications services” Application for final costs by the Affordable Access Coalition |, Introduction 1 The Affordable Access Coalition (the “AAC"), @ party to the proceeding initiated under Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2015-134, Review of basic telecommunications services, as amended ("Basic Services"), submits this application for costs under section 56 of the Telecommunications Act,’ and under section 66 of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure (the “Rules”)? The AAC consists of five large public interest organizations, and represented the largest group of public interest stakeholders. The AAC participated responsibly in this proceeding, fully responding to the Commission's consultation questions, commissioning expert evidence, answering interrogatories from all parties on that evidence and our submissions, putting forward a comprehensive proposal for improving access to basic telecommunications services by all Canadians, appearing at the public hearing and filing final written argument. The AAC believes that its participation in the S.C. 1993, ¢. 38, SOR/2010-277, tof 14Affordable Access Coalition Application for Final Costs ‘TNC 2015-134 (as amended) Basic Services proceeding contributed toward a better understanding of the issues, including but not limited to telecommunications access and affordability issues. 4, In order for the AAC to be eligible for costs, the AAC must satisfy the Commission that it: is directly interested or is representative of group or a class of subscribers that has an interest in the outcome of the proceeding; assisted the Commission in developing a better understanding of the matters to be considered; and participated in the proceeding in a responsible way, Additionally, the AAC must indicate the amount of costs requested, with receipts or detailed estimates; identify the respondents that should pay the costs; and serve all of the parties to the proceeding, 5. The AAC submits that it meets all of the elements of the test for final costs, as explained in the balance of this application 6. The AAC believes that the appropriate final costs respondents should be the telecommunications services providers by telecommunications operating revenues (TORs) that were active parties to this proceeding, and that the costs be apportioned according to the CRTC guidelines for the apportionment of costs. Il. The test for final costs 7. Subsection 66(1) set out the requirements for an award for final costs: 66 (1) In the application, the applicant must (a) demonstrate that they (i) have, or represent a group or a class of subscribers that has, an interest in the outcome of the proceeding, assisted the Commission in developing a better understanding of the matters that were considered, and (ill) participated in the proceeding in a responsible way; (b) identify the respondents that should pay the costs; and (0) if interim costs were awarded to them, provide an explanation of any difference between those interim costs and the final costs for which they are applying. 8. The AAC notes that on 17 May 2016, in the midst of this proceeding, the Commission introduced, without any notice, further guidance® on costs claims, and specifically regarding representation of a group or a class of subscribers. The Commission noted that the new Guidance for costs award applicants regarding representation of @ group or a class of subscribers, Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2016-188, 17 May 2016. 20f 14Affordable Access Coalition Application for Final Costs ‘TNC 2015-134 (as amended) guidance would apply to all claims filed subsequently to the date of the guidance, subject to its discretion in particular circumstances. 9. The AAC note firstly that the guidance comes very late in a very long proceeding and that the AAC members all proceeded on the basis of former costs rules interpretations. Therefore the AAC submits that the Commission consider this fact when exercising its discretion in this case. (2) AAC members are all representatives of a group or a class of subscribers with an interest in the outcome 10. The criteria for the awarding of final costs are found in s. 68 of the Rules. They are as follows: 68. The Commission must determine whether to award final costs and the maximum percentage of costs that is to be awarded on the basis of the following criteria: (a) whether the applicant had, or was the representative of a group or a class of subscribers that had, an interest in the outcome of the proceeding; (b) the extent to which the applicant assisted the Commission in developing a better understanding of the matters that were considered; and (c) whether the applicant participated in the proceeding in a responsible way. 11. In the Guidance for costs award applicants regarding representation of a group or a class of subscribers, the Commission notes that: “Blanket statements that a costs applicant represents @ group or a class of subscribers, without further elaboration, will generally not be sufficient for the Commission to conclude that a costs applicant satisfies this criterion.” 12, Nonetheless, all members of the AAC represent a group or a class of subscribers with an interest in the proceeding. 13. The Commission then listed a number of potential specifics that would assist the ‘Commission in making a determination that a party met the criteria of s. 63(a) (interim costs) or s. 68(a) (final costs): 10. In its costs application, a costs applicant should make submissions that clearly and specifically identify and describe the group or class of subscribers it purports to represent. This description could involve identifying the specific demographic or socio- of 14Affordable Access Coalition Application for Final Costs ‘TNC 2015-134 (as amended) economic features of the members of the group or class of subscribers. For example, a costs applicant that represents seniors and/or low-income consumers should clearly identify this in its costs application. 11. Describing the group or class of subscribers could also involve providing information ‘on the region or regions of Canada in which the group or class members are located. For example, a costs applicant that represents subscribers from a particular province should identify this. 12. If the costs applicant is or represents an umbrella organization in which other smaller organizations of subscribers are members, the application should identify these member organizations. 13. A costs application could also include details, if available, of the number of individuals making up the group or class of subscribers being represented. 14. Submissions in respect of this criterion should also explain the specific method or methods by which the costs applicant represents the group or class of subscribers. In other words, a costs applicant should describe how it determined that the positions it put forward in the substantive proceeding for which costs are being claimed reflected the interests of the group or class of subscribers it claims to represent Footnote 4 15. This could be through direct consultation with its members or otherwise. For instance, the costs applicant may have conducted a formal or informal poll of the subscribers who are its members, constituents, or stakeholders, or may have solicited feedback on a matter, for instance, through its website, through social media or other forms of digital communications, via telephone, or through in-person or online meetings. 16. In the event that a costs applicant did not canvass or consult members of the group or class of subscribers it purports to represent, the costs applicant should nonetheless address and explain how its positions reflect the interests of that group or class of subscribers. For instance, the costs applicant may provide evidence of research it has conducted or commissioned. 14, The AAC deals with each area of detail in turn, Para. 10; identify and describe the group or class of subscribers it purports to represent 15. AAC members are the following groups: * The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, Canada (‘ACORN Canada’); + The Consumers’ Association of Canada ("CAC"); * The Council of Senior Citizens Organizations of British Columbia (“COSCO”); + The National Pensioners Federation (‘NPF"); and 4of14Affordable Access Coalition Application for Final Costs. TNC 2015-134 (as amended) ‘+ The Public Interest Advocacy Centre ("PIAC”) 16. ACORN Canada is an independent national organization of low and moderate income families with 70,000+ members in 20+ neighbourhood chapters across 9 cities. See ACORN Canada, online: . 17. CAC is an independent, non-profit, volunteer-based charitable organization with a mandate to inform and educate consumers on marketplace issues, to advocate for consumers with government and industry, and work with government and industry to solve marketplace problems. See CAC, online: . 18. COSCO is the largest federation of senior citizens’ organizations in the province of British Columbia and is the umbrella organization of 79 seniors’ organizations and a significant number of individual associate members. See COSCO, online: , 19. NPF is a democratic, non-partisan, non sectarian organization with the mission to stimulate public interest in the welfare of aging Canadians, composed of 350 seniors chapters and clubs across Canada with a collective membership of 1,000,000 Canadian seniors and retired workers. See NPF, online: 20. PIAC is a federally incorporated non-profit organization and registered charity that provides legal and research services on behalf of consumer interests, and, in particular, vulnerable consumer interests, concerning the provision of important public services, PIAC’s members are its current board of directors, its honourary former members and its group members. PIAC's group members are: Alberta Council on Aging; Canadian Pensioners Concerned; Dying with Dignity; Federation of Metro Tenants’ Associations; Ontario Society of Senior Citizens’ Organizations; PEI Council of the Disabled; and Rural Dignity of Canada. See PIAG, online: . Para. 11: information on the region or regions of Canada in which the group or class members are located 21. As noted above, ACORN Canada and NPF are national organizations with members across Canada. 22. COSCO's members are based in British Columbia, 23. CAC is a national advocacy organization that has provincial chapters in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Bof 14‘Affordable Access Coalition Application for Final Costs ‘TNC 2015-134 (as amended) 24. PIAC is a national non-profit public interest advocacy organization that has members on its Board (presently 11) from 5 provinces and 1 territory (Nunavut) and has group representation that is itself regional (Alberta, PE!) as well as national. Para, 12: Umbrella organization's member organizations 25.CAC, NPF and COSCO (in B.C.) are umbrella organizations with regional member organizations. More details on each of the regional organizations comprising these groups can be found on their respective websites. 26. ACORN Canada is a standalone group, not an umbrella organization, but has a nationwide membership of low- to moderate income persons — over 80,000 members — organized into twenty neighbourhood chapters in nine cities across Canada. 27.PIAC is not an umbrella organization but has group members that are in turn such organizations (including Federation of Metro Tenants’ Associations and OSSCO), Para, 13: details, ifavailable, of the number of individuals making up the group or class of subscribers being represented 28. Due to the structure of most of the organizations in the AAC, exact number of individuals represented is difficult to state precisely. For ACORN, membership exceeds 80,000 Canadians. For NPF, including its member groups’ membership, over 1,000,000 seniors. CAC is an national advocacy organization with provincial chapters in Saskatchewan and Manitoba; CAC does not reveal its membership as it is not a membership-driven ‘organization. For COSCO, including individuals and members of sub-groups, 10,000. For PIAC, 15 members and honourary members, however, this number is well into the thousands when including members of group members OSSCO (160 seniors groups representing 500,000 individual seniors in Ontario); Alberta Council on Aging (4,500 individual members and 450 organizational members), Canadian Pensioners Concerned (5,000 individual members), Dying with Dignity (2,000 members), PE! Council of the Disabled (1,500 individuals), Rural Dignity (2000 members) and FMTA, which represents 92 tenants’ associations. OSSCO and COSCO are both in turn members of NPF. Paras. 14-16: method or methods by which the costs applicant represents the group or class of subscribers 29. The AAC's various members made efforts to determine their respective members’ and supporters’ views on the matters involved in this proceeding in various ways. The AAC Gof 14Affordable Access Coalition Application for Final Costs ‘TNC 2015-134 (as amended) members first note the difficulty in attempting to obtain views on specific and technical points in the strategy and proposals put forth by the group. However, feedback of a more general nature was possible from general membership of most groups. Most groups also develop more specific advocacy positions at their higher governance levels — typically at the Board of Directors level 30. Firstly, all of the groups at a senior management level reviewed all of the positions and all interventions, including oral interventions, before they were filed or presented 31. ACORN Canada was able to present the detailed argument of the AAC in its first and second written submissions to its Board. The Board generally approved of the submissions and provided feedback which was relayed to the lawyers on the file, Individual ACORN members filed 400 testimonials/feedback forms with the Commission on the subject of ‘communications affordability. ACORN further organized their membership to bring approximately 25 individual members to the oral hearing in April 2016. Their testimony is on the record. ACORN also was comfortable with the position of the AAC as expressed by their Toronto Director, Judy Duncan, due to previous research work on affordability of ‘communications done in conjunction with PIAC in 2014. 32. NPF also circulated the AAC positions to its national board. As Mr. John stated in the hearing: "We've communicated this by having discussions at our national executive board, with our provincial leaderships, and they in turn have had the discussion with their members at municipal or provincial levels. We've shared this on our website, newsletters, Facebook, and a couple of other forms of communication that we use, and our members do support a direction of improving access to broadband. 33. PIAC's Board of Directors and AGM were informed of the proceeding at the 2015 June ‘Annual General Meeting and were updated on progress at the November 2015 Directors’ meeting. The Board agreed with the position advanced by the AAC. PIAC relied upon public opinion research on: * Communications services to which Canadians of various demographic characteristics were subscribed, as well as barriers to subscription; Importance of telecommunications services to Canadian households; and ‘Types of contributions which Canadians were willing to make to ensure universal access and affordability of telecommunications services. in a random telephone poll. This research informed PIAC’s position as part of the AAC and was filed as Appendix E to the AAC’s initial intervention. “Transcript, 14 April 2016, at lines 5077-5078. Online: htio://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/transcripts/2016/1t0414,him Tof 14Affordable Access Coalition ‘Application for Final Costs. TNC 2015-134 (as amended) 34. PIAC further relied upon research it had undertaken on communications affordability (the No Consumer Left Behind report, filed as an appendix to the AAC's initial remarks) to inform its position. Finally, PIAC on behalf of the AAC commissioned public opinion research (filed with the AC's second intervention) that surveyed the views of low-income Canadians who were already online towards communications affordability 35. CAC's Board of Directors was informed of the proceeding through their President, Mr. Bruce Cran, during meetings in 2015 and 2016. Mr. Cran was appraised at all steps of the proceeding of the AAC arguments and he agreed with the same. 36. Likewise, COSCO senior management was provided with all submissions and had correspondence with counsel on the file. (c) AAC groups have a direct interest in the outcome; mandates of AAC members are to represent public at large 37. All of the groups represented in the AAC have, either in their constating documents or in their mission statements, commitments to represent the general public interest, or a subset of that general public interest (for example, NPF represents seniors, as does COSCO, while ‘ACORN Canada represents low- and middle-income Canadians). 38. Certain of the AAC groups have a very specific mandate to represent the public in regulatory and related proceedings, and thus claim to have a direct interest in CRTC regulatory proceedings. PIAC is a national non-profit, continued under the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act and a registered charity. PIAC's purposes under its Articles of Continuance are: 1. to engage in the research and study of matters of concer and interest to the public and to publish or otherwise make available the results of said research an study or any works of public concern or interest; 2. to act as a liaison between other public interest or citizens’ groups engaged in public interest advocacy, 3. to assist in and promote the activity of public interest representation throughout Canada and elsewhere, and to cooperate with other public interest and citizens’ groups throughout Canada and elsewhere; and 4, to make representations to governing authorities on behalf of the public at large or on behalf of public interest groups with respect to matters of public concern ind interest, and to teach public interest advocacy skills and techniques. Bof 14Affordable Access Coalition ‘Application for Final Costs TNC 2015-134 (as amended) 39. While PIAC’s particular objects of incorporation may be unique within the AAG, they are the stated purposes, and as part of the AAC, PIAC therefore has a direct interest in the outcome of the proceeding 40. Subsection 70(2) of the Rules states, in reference to “fixing costs or taxing final costs The total amount of the costs must not exceed the total amount of costs necessarily and reasonably incurred by the applicant or the costs set out in the scale of costs established by the Commission under subsection 56(2) of the Telecommunications Act. 41. The AAC submits that it meets all of the requirements of the test for final costs, as explained in the balance of this section, (d) Assisted the Commission in developing a better understanding of matters considered 42. The AAC’s performance to in the Basic Services proceeding was extensive in terms of fling evidence and perspectives that assisted the Commission in developing a better understanding of the matters to be considered. 43. In direct response to the Commission's consultation questions set out in Appendix B of TNC 2015-134, the AAC submitted extensive comments based in relevant law, regulation, and policy, technological knowledge, economic expertise, and empirical evidence, with @ view to the public interest and long-range implications for Canadian society as a whole. In answering the Commission's questions and analyzing key issues in this proceeding, the ‘AAC offered a distinct, user-focused and public interest-oriented perspective, combined with the high level legal expertise and regulatory experience gained through PIAC’s long history of participating in CRTC proceedings. 44. In addition, the AAC further assisted the Commission by taking a practical, solutions- oriented approach, providing concrete proposals, including the development of two funding models to support access to basic telecommunications service, developed by Edgardo ‘Sepulveda, an expert in universal service funding regime. 45. The AAC submits that its contributions to the public record and to the Commission's understanding of key matters—such as the consequences of telecommunications regulatory decisions for more marginalized individuals in Canadian society, or public interest-oriented yet economically feasible solutions ready for potential implementation—were valuable and unique in the context of the Basic Services proceeding of 14Affordable Access Coalition Application for Final Costs ‘TNC 2015-134 (as amended) 46. The AAC therefore submits that it meets the requirements of subsection 61(1\a\(il) and subsection 68(b) of the Rules in that it assisted the Commission in developing a better understanding of the matters that were considered. (e) Responsible tion 47. The AAC participated in this proceeding in a responsible, thorough, and good-faith manner in all stages of this proceeding, 48. The AAC filed an extensive first-round intervention, with primary survey evidence, and proposed at this early stage two subsidy models, supported by expert evidence, that addressed the Commission's concerns as stated in TNC 2015-134. The AAC then devoted considerable attention to first-round interrogatories, drawing out and clarifying information from other parties for the public record. The AAC also made sure to be responsive to other parties, answering interrogatories to the extent of its abilities—in fact, the AAC received only one request for further response aut of over 150 discrete questions, and moreover simply to confirm a point already resolved. 49. The AAC likewise fully participated in the second round of interventions, filing an updated expert report on our subsidy proposals in response to questions and valid points raised in the interrogatory rounds. The AAC also filed with its extensive and well-reasoned second intervention additional primary evidence in the form of a survey of communications affordability amongst low-income internet users. 50. The AAC presented clear and cogent argument at the oral hearing, with an appearance lasting over two hours. The AAC brought representatives of its major groups to the hearing, who testified directly to the Commission. 51. The AAC promptly and thoroughly answered its undertakings from the oral hearing, 52. The AAC fully answered the Commission's jurisdictional questions on 5 May 2016. 53. The AAC filed final written reply, on time, that was cogent and helped to frame the overall arc of the proceeding. 54. The AAC submits, thal it manifestly assisted the Commission with a better understanding of the issues, at all times bringing a consumer and in particular, low-income consumer perspective to the table. The AAC also submits that it provided the Commission with a 100f 14Affordable Access Coailtion ‘Application for Final Costs, TNC 2016-134 (as amended) workable subsidy model which it introduced from the start of the proceeding and explained with expert evidence, that would allow the Commission to seriously consider subsidies as part of the decision, 55. Furthermore, work was allocated efficiently among available staff and outside counsel, maximizing use of junior counsel or students where appropriate. 56. The AAC therefore submits that it meets the requirements of subsection 61(1)(a\Xii) and ‘subsection 68(b) of the Rules. (9 The amount of costs requested, with receipts or detailed estimates 57. The AAC requests the full costs detailed in this application for its participation in the Basic Services proceeding. 58. As required by subsection 61(1)(c), the AAC provides time sheets for the counsel, students, and consultants who worked on the proceeding to that date. 59. As required by the Costs Guidelines,’ the AAC is filing an affidavit of disbursements in Form IV, including a summary statement of disbursements as Exhibit A. The AAC also files 2 summary of the total fees and disbursements claimed as prescribed in Form V. 60. These are not estimates but actual time dockets for time and expenses. The costs are calculated using the Commission's costs scale, as set aut in Revision of CRTC costs award practices and procedures - Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-963. (g) Costs necessarily and reasonably incurred 61. The proposed final costs award is reasonable and appropriate. The AAC expects some parties to consider the final costs application high. The AAC submits that itis entitled to the entire claimed amount, however, for the following reasons. 62. The Basic Services proceeding was a major, fundamental framework proceeding that could have major impacts for all Canadians regarding the essential service that is broadband internet as well as other telecom services that are essential to Canadians. The AAC brough to the proceeding a distinct consumer and low-income Canadians perspective, and extensive evidence in support of its positions. : At para, 8 11 of 14Affordable Access Coalition Application for Final Costs TNC 2015-134 (as amended) 63. The AAC has relied on articling students, law students, and junior counsel to the extent possible to avoid incurring excessive costs, as required in the Guidelines. The bulk of the work on this file has been by the most junior of resources, with supervision and involvement by more senior resources. 64. The AAC, however, takes issue with perspectives of some TSPs in our interim costs application that strategy meetings amongst lawyers, staff, experts and clients are somehow “over-lawyering” or “too many people’ or some other inchoate concem. It is AC's submission to the Commission that in a proceeding of this importance and complexity, the importance of reasonable meeting time amongst all participants on an advocacy team to discuss strategy and argument are key to success and an effective and efficient Participation. Therefore the AAC is submitting all such time, which was properly incurred and is permitted on the face of the costs rules, with this claim, 65. We await the Commission's exercise of its overall discretion regarding our costs. However, we submit that given the importance of the proceeding, the extensive and responsible participation of the AAC and its significant and unique viewpoint, the Commission should grant all costs claimed. (h) Identification of interim costs respondents, and apportionment 66. Subsection 61(1)(d) of the Rules requires the interim costs applicant to identify the interim costs respondents. The AAC submits that all TSPs participating in the proceading are the appropriate costs respondent, subject to the comments below. 67. The AAC notes that the Commission has “generally determined that the appropriate costs respondents to an award of costs are the parties that have a significant interest in the proceeding in question and have participated actively in that proceeding,”* 68. The Commission's practice has generally been to “allocate the responsibility for payment of costs among costs respondents based on their telecommunications operating revenues {TORs) as an indicator of the relative size and interest of the parties involved in the proceeding.”” « Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre and the Consumers’ Association of Canada in the proceeding regarding the practice by certain telecommunications service providers to charge a fee for paper bils - Telecom Order CRTC 2014-437 (21 ‘August 2014) at para, 12. 7" Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of the Consumers’ Association of Canada and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre in the proceeding leading to Telecom Decision 2016-70 regarding the expity of certain time-limited exogenous factors - Telecom Order CRTC 2018-194 (18 May 2015) at para. 12. 120f14Affordable Access Coalition ‘Application for Final Costs. ‘TNC 2015-134 (as amended) 69. In Telecom Order 2015-160, the Commission “considered $1,000 to be the minimum ‘amount that a costs respondent should be required to pay due to the administrative burden that small costs awards impose on both the applicant and costs respondents.”* 70. To limit the number of costs respondents, Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-963 ‘states that "When a costs award exceeds $20,000, the Commission will generally award no more than one extra costs respondent for each additional $5,000 awarded”, and the Cost Guidelines provide the following scale. ‘Amount Awarded Number of Respondents $ $1,000 Maximum 3 respondents {$1,000.03 to $10,000 Maximum 6 respenderts $10,000.01 to £20,000 Maximum 10 respondents > $20,000 Maximum 1 extra respondent for each additional $5,000 awarded = 71. According to this scale, the number of potential costs respondents for the AAC’s interim costs claim would be up to 97: 10 respondents for the first $20,000 claimed, plus 87 respondents for the balance of the total claim of $455,089.49 72. The AAC recommends that costs should, to be consistent with Commission practice, be apportioned according in proportion to TORS, but be limited to the TSP parties that have a significant interest in the proceeding in question and participated actively in the Basic Services proceeding. Further, should any TOR calculation result in an award of less than $1000, that TSP could be dropped, with their share added to the total to be paid by the remaining TSPs. () Payment 73. If awarded, respondents should make payment as follows: Public Interest Advocacy Centre 1204-ONE Nicholas Street Ottawa, ON KIN 787 3 Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of the Consumers’ Association of Canada and the Public interest Advocacy Centre in the proceeding leading to Telecom Decision 2015-70 regarding the expiry of certain time-limited exogenous factors - Telecom Order CRTC 2015-194 (15 May 2015) at para. 12. 130f 14Affordable Access Coalition ‘Application for Final Costs ‘TNC 2015-134 (as amended) 74. Should you have any questions regarding the details of the claim please contact PIAC's office administrator, Donna Brady at 613-562-4002 ext. 21 or dbrady@piac.ca @ Service 75. This application is served on the parties to the Basic Services proceeding, as i the most recently used Distribution List. IL Conclusion 76. The Basic Services proceeding was @ massive, wide-ranging, complex proceeding with many component pars critical to the health of the Canadian telecommunications system, and by extension, the Canadian digital economy and welfare of Canadians, The AAC was pleased to be a part of this important process, 77. The Commission has promised to the intervenors that rulings on final costs claims will be made prior to the release of the final decision. We underline the importance of that promise cof the Commission, and ask that this claim be treated with all due dispatch. Yours truly, Counsel fo the AAC ce: Distribution List, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2015-134 (by email) Encl *** End of document*** 14 of 14certe47e - New Form Page 1 of 2 WON eines elon GRSanea Re Proceeding No: FORM V - SUMMARY OF FEES AND DISBURSEMENTS este PERC fe te /fcotr/upt/cosco FEES CLAIMED: (roa aplesble aves tes any aootcabo tx rebates) NAME OF CLAIMANT. [TOTAL claim | SusToraL TsustoraL [TOTAL [eoacrees: [EEGAL COUNSEL (stench mahal copay) Gort aire 2], FOL. Gov LASPoRD 5, Fenn. franca £ Feysia Line SUBTOTAL-Tepal Gameai Fone TEAL ASSSTANT [teach Ra ERT EARISTIAN STeuRey 586.08 Se ANITA Spuie $56.25 3 ‘SUBTOTAL eat sear Fees — ‘ARTICUNG STUDENT (at ach vial separ faut ScaAsST AW 12,707. oo | ‘CONSULTANTS [ANALYSTS FEES: ‘GONSULTANTS: (Uist each nda! soparsey) 7 2 aT Soames = TOTES ae AT TTY hewaman fisip | 2,762.0 2 SUSI Amyares SUBTOTAL: CONSULTANT ANALYST FEES 2702. 0 ‘EXPERT WATWEES FEES: Cit each invioal opal). EgAteo Stpulueva 175,194.22 2 ‘SUBTOTAL EXPERT WITNESS FEES: 2175, 197. ores DALE? ‘IS EURSEMENT= [Rae a pice a es ryote ax eS) SUBTOTAL OISGURSEMENTS EXCLUDING MEALS ZS 9.67 SUBTOTAL MEALS CLAMED [Hdd [ora ON SUREERETE % f TOTAL FEES AND OSBURESTENTS G[eff Sanedian Radio-television nd Telecommunications Commission PIAC File #6a87——] RTC Tolecom N of C 2015-134 Review of basic telecommunications services FORM | - SUMMARY OF LEGAL FEES Applicant: [PIREIGREINGORNINPFICOSCG Claimant: Employment status of daimant, a reported to the law society (ies) of which the claimants a member Claimants The: Arting Sudont [—] (check one} Legal Assistant [] Date when qualified as a law clerk or paralegal: § [id iets oa inst natn wade reer ean icin tees ta Be tlt hoe oat ninety eo TSS EST Fr cs id ii inst Soe fen Cos: SERVICE Tinie CLAIMED FEE CLAIMED ee ae | enn Mester REERRATIOR eS po ee eae ee es ince | a — joes hae 2 "5 a er aires s fessea0— es aoe a ees peeseeeoe! Se fea Pie Merepeser fe Se cation ae ee Ee Peart Bes Breede [a= eee Naoto az lore ape: ; peoceouRAL: Eos fenton sat Rete eer ; ; eo cia: ia FZ rorar ree ae aa (GsT@T [PST @] I HST@ [13%)) ($13,170.23 HST Allowable Claimed]) [53,973.41 ee ea Lert atthe shove bens us and apa Owe ae ce) Sartre of claimant anad't CRTC 43E (2010-12) version francaise disponible Canad‘TraxTime report for Geoff White created 10/14/2015 09:53 AM Thursday, April 09, 2018 - Total 0.3, in: 12:23p out 1239p 0.38487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing TNC Monday, April 13, 2016 - Total 2.5 in: 14:30a out 11:37a 02-8487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW feviewing TNC in: 11:42a out 12:05 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing TNC in: 2:00p out 3:49p 1.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Attend PIAC meeting re fle Wednesday, April 16, 2015 - Total 07 in: 2:23p out 3:05p 0.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing research and file Thursday, April 16, 2015 - Total 1.5 in: 9:55 out 11:22a 1.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Prepare for and meet with A. Lau and K. Sebastian re survey Friday, April 17, 2015 - Total 1.3 in: 14:11a —out. 17:33a 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing and revising draft lst of survey questions in: 2:44p out 338p 0.96487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Client communication; reviewing file Monday, April 20, 2015 - Total 0.2 in: 8:532 out $:02a 0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ‘Communications with potential stakeholders, Tuesday, April 21, 2015 - Total 24 in849a" out $192 0.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Correspondence regarding potential expert im t:22p out 3:15p 1.96487 TNC 2015-194 REVIEW Attend PIAC team meeting Wednesday, April 22, 2015 - Total 0.2 in: 9:52 out 10.082 0.2 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ‘Communications with potential expert Friday, April 24, 2015 - Total 1.3. in: 9558 out: 11:08 13 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Attend survey design meeting with A. Lau and K. Sebastian Monday, April 27, 2016 - Total 2.4 in: 9:352 out: 9:58a «04 «6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ‘Comments on survey draft of A. Lau in: 2:27p out:2;35p 02-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Prepare for meeting with potential PIAC expert in: 2:38p out 3:10p «06 6487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Prepare for meeting with potential PIAC expert in: 3:27 out 4:35p = 1.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEWTuesday, April 28, 2015 - Total 1.2 in: 2:40p out 3:50p 1.2. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing consultation questions; preparing organizational document ‘Monday, May 04, 2015 - Total 3.6 in: 10:32a out 10:37a_ 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and prepare for PIAC meeting in: 10:40a out. 11:24a_0.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and prepare for PIAC meeting in: 11:25a out 12:05p 0.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and prepare for PIAC meeting; note to J. Lawford and A. Lau in: 1:36p out: 3:32p = 26487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW PIAC team meeting Tuesday, May 05, 2015 - Total 1.3 in: 10:46a out: 11:10a_ 046487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Preparing initial submission introduction in: 11:18a_— out: 12:04p 0.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Preparing initial submission introduction Thursday, May 07, 2018 - Total 2.6 8402 out 8:55a 0.3 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW iscussing file with J. Lawford in 9:41a out: 10:12a 08 6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Reviewing file and coordinating inputs in: 10:38a out: 10:51a_ 036487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing file and coordinating inputs in: 11:14a_— out: 12:00p «08 += 487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing file and coordinating inputs inc 1:50p out: 2:20p 0.5 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing file and coordinating inputs Friday, May 08, 2015 - Total 1 in: 8:53a out 10:29a 0.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ie/client management and administration in: 10:56a out 11:17a 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management Monday, May 11, 2015 - Total 3.7 in: 16a out 41a 0.56487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management in: 10:07a out 10:13a 0.16487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Research in: 10:17a out 10414046487 TNC.2015-134 REVIEW Research in: 10:45a out: 11:58a 1.3 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research in: 1:20p out: 1:26p = 0.1.8487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research in: 4:30p out 1:99 0.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research in: 2:05p out 240p 0.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research in: 3106p out 3:18p = 0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEWTuesday, May 12, 2015 - Total 1.3 in: 11:74 out: 12:08p 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in249p out 3:01p =» «02-—6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in:3:02p out. S14p = .2 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in: 3:20p out 3469 = 0.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing E. Sepulveda memo; Note to J. Lawford ‘Wednesday, May 13, 2015 - Total 4.2 in: 9:59@ out: 10:35a 0.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Note from E, Sepulveda; reviewing comments on PIAC extension request; file management im: 10:44a_— out: 14:06a 0.48487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File and client management in: 11:14a_— out: 14:49a0.6 ©6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File and client management in: 4:18 out 1:28p © «0.26487 TNC 2015-194 REVIEW File management in: 1:53p out 412p 2.46487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Attend PIAC BSO team meeting Friday, May 15, 2015 - Total 2.1 in: 9:14a out: 91532 0.7 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management in: 9:582 out: 11:18a 1.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW le management; drafting core propositions/themes document ‘Thursday, May 21, 2016 - Total 1.6 in: 2:40p out: 4:12p 1.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Prepare for and meeting with PIAC team and expert Monday, May 25, 2015 - Total 2.1 in: 10:45a out 11:03a 03 6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW TC from/to D, Leebosh re survey in: 12:13p out 12:30p 0.36487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Prepare for meeting with FCM in: 4:15p out: 2:20p 1.1. 6487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Prepare for and meet with FCM re issues in: 255p out: 3:15p 0.46487 TNC. 2015-134 REVIEW Research; note to J. Lawford Tuesday, May 28, 2016 - Total 1.1 in: 10212 out 10-46a«0S ©6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management in 10:54a_— out 11:07a «036487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management in: 14:17a—out 17:30a 0.8. 8487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management, note to file eam Wednesday, May 27, 2015 - Total 1.7 in: 12:05p out 1234p © 05-8487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Drafting, fle management in: 12:53p out: 1:03p «0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEWDrafting, file management in 1106p out 1:42p = 0.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting, file management in: 3:27p out 3:51p = 0.4 «6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting, file management ‘Thursday, May 28, 2016 - Total 3.7 in: 9:22a out'9:40a «0.38487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Draft from €. Sepulveda in: S:42a out 10:17a 0.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Draft from €. Sepulveda in: 10:20a out: 10:54a_ O68 §=—6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in: 14:03aout 11:10a 0.26487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in: 11:15aout 11:393 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research (Hansard) and drafting in: 2:42p out: 2:25p 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research in: 2:30p out:3:17p = «08-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Dratting in: 3:19p out:3:45p «0.56487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Dratting Friday, May 29, 2015 - Total 2.8 in: 1:28p out 1:40p 0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing E. Sepulveda materials; research in 1:40p out: 2:13p 0.6 §~— 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing E, Sepulveda materials; research in: 2:16 out: 2:379 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing E, Sepulveda materials: research in: 2:41p out: 4:17p 1.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing E. Sepulveda materials; research.; TC with J. Lawford to. Sepulveda Monday, June 01, 2015 - Total 0.1 in: 11-454 out 11:51a_ 0.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing procedural letter from Commission re extension; note to PIAC file team ‘Tuesday, June 02, 2015 - Total 1.1 in: 2:46p out 3:51p 4.4. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing file; meeting with stakeholders Wednesday, June 03, 2015 - Total 0.9 in: 9:48a out 10:26a 0.7 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Notes; briefing note to PIAC in: 10:42a out 10:50a_ 0.2 ©6487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Notes; briefing note to PIAC Thursday, June 04, 2016 - Total 1.4 in:9:382 | out 10:08a 0.6 6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Reviewing file; expert report in 10:12a "out 10:41a 0.5 ©6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing file; expert reportin: 10:43a_— out 14:00a 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing file; expert report; note to J. Lawford; Administering file Friday, June 05, 2015 - Total 0.3 in: 2:58p out 3:16p = 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Administering file Monday, June 08, 2015 - Total 0.3 in 3:42p out: 3:55p 0.3 8487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Discussing file with J, Lawford Tuesday, June 09, 2015 - Total 25 in: 10:84 out 10:44a_ 0.1. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW E from/to E. Sepulveda; administering file in: 10:46a out: 10:53a «0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ‘Administering file in: 11:13a out: 14:50a «07 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in: 2:21p out: 3:099 0.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in: 3:14p out 3:5p = 07-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting Wednesday, June 10, 2015 - Total 2.8 in out, 06487 TNC. 2015-134 REVIEW Attend PIAC team meeting in: 8214 out: 8:28a = «0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ‘Administering file in: 8:35a out: 9:28a «0.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in: 9314 out 11:13a 1.7 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and drafting; attend PIAC meeting/call with E. Sepulveda Friday, June 12, 2016 - Total 0.5 in: 3:10p out 3:38p = 0.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW. Administering file; Monday, June 15, 2018 - Total 1.4 in: 2:45p out 4:05p = 1.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Prepare for / tc with J. Lawford to E, Sepulveda Wednesday, June 17, 2015 - Total 4.4 in: 11:13a_out: 14:24a 0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Administering file in 14:26a "out 1218p 0.96487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Research in: 12:25p out 1342p = 4.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research; reviewing survey results and note to J, Lawford and A. Lau; TC from E. Sepulveda in: 1:45p out: 3:30p = 1.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research; in: 3:34p out: 3:45p = «02-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research;Thursday, June 18, 2015 - Total 5.1 i: 10:14a_— out 10:57a 0.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research; fle management; drafting: various emails in: 11:03a out 11:28a0.8. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research; file management; drafting; various emails in: 141a_— out 12:11p 0.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research; file management; drafting; various emails in: 12:30p out 2:13p 1.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research; file management; drafting; various emails in: 2:18 out: 319p "1.1 6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Research; file management; drafting; various emails in: 3:30p out:3:51p| 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research; file management; drafting; various emails; TC from J. Macri of CRTC Friday, June 19, 2015~ Total 5.6 in: 9:082 out 10:43a_ 1.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Disclosure letter to Commission; discussing file with J. Lawford (m10:48a out 11:25 0.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research; discussing research with C. Steuart in: 14:35a—out: 14402016487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File administration; research in Th47a out 12:14p 0.56487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW File administration; research in: 2:35p out 3:37p 4.1. 6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW File administration; research; disclosure request in: 3:44p out 4:31p 0.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File administration; research; disclosure request; filing in: 8:10p out: 5:51p 0.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Draft material from J-F Leger Monday, June 22, 2016 - Total 4.8 in; 9:50a out 10:36a 0.86487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW File management; ES report in: 10:40a out 11:25a«0.8 ©6487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW File management; ES report in: 11:47a out 1230p 0.8 ©8487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW File management; ES report in: 1247p out 2"14p 4.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management; research in: 2:28p out: 2:48 = 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management; research in: 2:49p out 3:13p 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management; research in: 3:14p out: 3:20p 0.16487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW File management; research Tuesday, June 23, 2016 - Total 5.2 in: 9:18 out $452 0.56487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and incorporating sections in: 9:552 out 10:53a1 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and incorporating sections in 11:08a out 12:15p 1.2 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and incorporating sections; various emails and Discussions in: 12:37 outi2:24p 1.86487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Reviewing expert report; meeting to discuss with J. Lawfordin: 2:45p out: 3005p 0.48487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and incorporating sections in: 3:22p out 340p 0.3. «6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and incorporating sections Wednesday, June 24, 2016 - Total 1.9 in: 10:10a out 10:31 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting in: 10:33a out 12:00 1.56487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; discussing evidence w J. Lawford ‘Thursday, June 25, 2015 - Total 3.3 in: 9:39@ out 50a «02 ©6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Note from E. Sepulveda in: 9:54 out: 10:16a 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing draft im: 10:24 out 14:072 08 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Brief discussion with JF Leger, Note to J. Lawford re expert evidence in 14:28a out 14:55a 05 ©6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Researching past positions in: 1:39 out’ 0.1. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Researching past positions in: 2:24p out 2:30p = 0.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research in: 2:56p out 4:14p 4.3. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research; TC from E. Sepulveda; Discussion with J. Lawford Friday, June 26, 2015 - Total 6.5 in: 8:50a out 10:14a_ 1.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Various discussions with PIAC lawyers; drafting; administering file in: 10:18a out: 11:08a_ «0.9 ©6487 TNC.2015-134 REVIEW Drafting in 11108 out 11:302 0.46487 TNC. 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; research in 11:32a out 14:59a 0S ©6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; research in: 4:11 out: 2:00 1.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; TC from E. Sepulveda and several emails from him in: 2:50p out 342p 0.9 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; research Monday, June 29, 2015 - Total 7.4 in: 8:03a out $:04a 4.4. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management; drafting in: 9:108 out Sida 0.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management; drafting in: 9:45a out 10:08a 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting in: 10:12a out 11:26a 1.38487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting in: 12:00p out 1:45p 1.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Meeting with stakeholder re proceeding in: 216p out: 2:49p 0.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and draftingin: 3:07p out 3:23p = 0.3. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in 3:30p cut 348» 03.8487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW File management; in 9:20p out 1015p 1.8487 TNC. 2015-134 REVIEW Preparing summary positions Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - Total 5.8 im 6:33a out 9:22 © 0.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; file management im 9:32a_ out 10:69a 1.56487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting: file management in: 11:30 out 2:30p = 3-8 487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Attending meeting with PIAC in: 3:30p out 3:54p 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management Thursday, July 02, 2016 - Total 5.4 in: 9:05a' out 10:25a 1.46487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Drafting; reviewing report from E. Sepulveda in 10:34a out 11:49a_ 1.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting: reviewing report from E. Sepulveda; TC with J. Lawford and E. Sepulveda in: 1243p out 2004p 1.4.—6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Drafting client communiqué in 2:08p out 2:23p 0,3. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ‘Administering file; note to PIAC working group in: 2:38p out 2:52p 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Client communication; disclosure of contribution info; inputs from K. Sebastian in: 3:01p out 3:27p 0.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Revising client communication, administering file in: 3:33p out: 3:43p «0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Discussing file with J. Lawford; considering strategy Friday, July 03, 2015 - Total 5.7 in: out 06487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in: 8:072 out: 1219p 32-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research; meeting with K. Sebastian and J. Lawford re fle in: 1205p out:2:10p 1.1 6487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Research and drafting in, 2:22p out: 3:46p 1.46487 TNG 2016-134 REVIEW Research and drafting Monday, July 06, 2015 - Total 5.7 in: 8:32a out'8:43a «026487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management in: 8:53a out 939a «08 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting in: 9:40 out: 10:20a 0.7 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; file management in: 10:38a owt 10:59a 0.46487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Drafting; file management in: 11:07a out 12:00p «08-6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Dratting; file managementin:4:01p_ out 2500 1.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; file management in265p out 3:39p © 08-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; file management Tuesday, July 07, 2015 - Total 5.4 in: 8:11 out @50a 4.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; file management in: 9:52a out 11:57a 2.1 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting: file management in: 1217p out 1:20p «1.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; file management in: 1:23p out 1:53p «0.56487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; fle management ‘Wednesday, July 08, 2015 - Total 8.1 in: 8:204 out: 11:55a 3.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; meeting with J. Lawford and A. Lau; multiple emails; fie management im: 12:34p our 3:30p = 38487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting in: 3:35p out: §:02p 1.8. «6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting; note to PIAC file team Thursday, July 09, 2018 - Total 5.2 in: out 06487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in 9:56a out: 11:11a1.3 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing inv 11:74 out 11:24a_— 0.28487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing; TC with interested party in: 11:27a out 12:05p 0.78487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in 1:35p out: 4:32p 3.6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing; discussion with J. Lawford; client communication; various other emails Friday, July 10, 2015 - Total 6.6 in‘ out’ 0487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in: 9-158 out: 12:32p 3.3. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing and discussing file with J, Lawford in: 1:06p out: 1:36p = «0.56487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting end editing in: 2:03p out: 4483p 28 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing; discussions with J. Lawford; TC with J. Lawford to ACORN: various other emails and discussions Sunday, July 12, 2015 - Total 5.4 in: 1246p out: 2005p 1.46487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in: 2:10p out: 4:01p 1.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in: 4:06 out 4:57p —0.9-—«6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing; note to J. Lawford in: 7:45p out! 8:56p 1.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editingMonday, July 13, 2015 - Total 10.3 in:5:10a out 6:50a_ 1.76487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing invB:37a out: 10:40a- 2.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing; discussions with various PIAC resources in: 10:45a out 10:52a_ 0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing; discussions with various PIAG resources in: 10:56a out 11:56a 18487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in: 1224p out 1:10p = «O.8)—6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in:415p out 1:58p 88487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in: 2:03p out 3:05p 1,1. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and exiting in: 3:36p out 3:52p «036487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in: 8:25p out 10:41p 2.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - Total 11.1 in: 7:47a out: 7:66a «02-6487 TNC. 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in: 7:57a out 8:22a © 05-6487 TNC 2015-124 REVIEW Drafting and editing in: 8:25a out 1212p 38 6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing and client consultation jn: 12:38p out 2:32p 1.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in: 2:57p out 3:18p 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing in: 3:49p out 7:35p 4.3. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Drafting and editing and filing and serving Wednesday, July 15, 2015 - Total 0.7 in: 9:052 out 9:46a_ 0.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File administration; administering summarizing of interventions ‘Tuesday, July 28, 2015 -Total 0.7 in 9:35a out: 42a 0.26487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW \iscussing file with J. Lawford, C. Steuart, and C. Koo. in: 10:252 out 10:50a 0.56487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW ‘Administering file Wednesday, July 29, 2015 - Total 2.3, in: $:53a out 10-412 0.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Prepare for and meet with J. Lawford and J. Duncan (ACORN) in: 2:30p out 245p 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing file; brief discussion with C, Steuart in: 2:47p out: 3:t11p 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing interventions out: 3:57» = «0.88487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing interventionsThursday, July 30, 2015 - Total 2.7 in 9:60 out: 10:40a 0.9 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ‘Administering file and asking of interrogs in: 10:55a out 11:19a0.4—-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing summaries of interventions in: 11:25a out 14:43a«0.3. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing summaries of interventions in: 11:48a out 12:08p 0.46487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Reviewing summaries of interventions in: 3:08 out 0.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing summaries in: 3:34p out 4:15» 0.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing summaries; various emails Friday, July 31, 2015 - Total 4.7 in: 8:57a out 51a 0.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Preparing for PIAC meeting in: 9:55 out 11:30a 1.68487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Meeting with PIAC team with TC to E. Sepulveda to discuss interrogatories. in: 11:33a_—out: 0.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ‘Administering file; note to PIAC team in: 1:24p out: 1:54p 0.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Prepare for meeting with Cree nation / EEYOU in: 2:00p out 3:37p 1.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ‘Meeting with J. Lawford and Cree nation / EEYOU Tuesday, August 04, 2015 - Total 4,2 in: 9:232 out: 10:34a 1.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ACORN testimonials and letter to Commission; parties responses to RFis In: 10:39a out 11:08a 0.5 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Parties responses to RFs; voice message to John Macri in 11a out: 14:28a 0.36487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Parties responses to RFIs in 1:24p out: 4:53p 0.5 6487 TNG 2018-134 REVIEW Parties responses to RFIS in: 2:00p out221p 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW ‘TC from Christine Bailey of CRTC in: 228p out 2509 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing responses to RFs, in: 2385p out 3:24p 0.56487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing responses to RFs in: 3:30p out: 353p_ 04 ©8487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing responses to RFIs Wednesday, August 05, 2015 - Total §.4 in 857a out: 9:22a 0.66487 TNC. 2018-134 REVIEW Reviewing interventions; drafting interrogs in:@27a out 10:39a_1.2 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing interventions; drafting interrogs in: 11:16a out 12:08p = 0.9 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing interventions; drafting interrogs; Discussion with C. Koo in: 1:05p out: 1:38p 0.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing interventions; drafting interrogs 1In: 1242p out: 3:529 = «22-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing interventions; drafting interrogs Thursday, August 08, 2015 - Total 6.2 in) out «06487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW interrogatories jn:735a out 8132.7 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW interrogatories in:816a out B54a_— 76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW interrogatories in:6:57a out 10:24a 1.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW interrogatories; numerous emails ini 1:40a_ out 12:55p 1.3. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogatories in: 1:33p out 1:51p 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogatories in: 1:56p out 3:14p 1.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogatories in: 3:23p out 3:42p 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogatories; various emails Friday, August 07, 2015 - Total 6.1 in: 8:01a out 6:29a © «0.5 «487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs in: 9:16 out: 11:26a 22 ©6487 TNC 2015-124 REVIEW Interrogs; several emails; discussion with C. Khoo in: 11:30a out 1219p 0.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs; several emails in: 1:08p out 2:00p = 16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs in: 2004p out 2:33p «056487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs in: 2:36p out: 240p 0.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Intertogs in: 7:50p out:8:44p 0.9 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Coordinating interrogs; note to PIAC fle team. ‘Tuesday, August 11, 2015 - Total 5.5 in: 8:43a out: 10:262 17 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File administration; interrogs; PIAC team call to review interrogatories in: 10:41a out: 11:58a 1.36487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Interrogs, in: 4:16p out: 2:21p 1.1. 6487 TNC.2016-134 REVIEW Interrogs: in: 2:27 out 346p 1.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs; note to J. Lawford Wednesday, August 12, 2015 - Total 4.4 in: 8538 out’ 9:13a «0.4 «6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs in: 9:26a out: 10:08 0.7 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs in: 10:17a out: 10:50. «06 =—6487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Interrogs 2In: 10:55a out 12:06p 1.2 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Disclosure request to Commission and filing and serving in: 1:36p out 2:20p 0.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs, in: 2:52p out 3:32p 0.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs, Thursday, August 13, 2015 - Total 1.3 in: 2:38p out 3539 1.3. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs; emails to C. Khoo Friday, August 14, 2015 - Total 4.1 in: 8:303 out 9354 1.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs; discussion with J. Lawford; notes to/from J. Lawford in: 11:18a out 1233p 1.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs in: 4:50p out 220p 0.86487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs; administering file in: 2:38p out: 2:47p 0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs in: 4:00p out 5:00p 16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Finalize and file and serve interogs; note to PIAC team Tuesday, August 18, 2015 - Total 0.9 in: 8:20p out: 9:11p 0.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing consolidated set of interrgs and designating primes; Note to PIAG file team Tuesday, August 25, 2015 - Total 1.7 in: 2:30p out 246p «0.3 8487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management; interrog responses in: 2:51 out:2:68p 02 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management; interrog responses; discussing file with J Lawford in: 3:00p out 4:11p 1.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW File management, interrog responses; call with J. Lawford and C. Khoo to E. Sepulveda re interrag responses August 31, 2015 - Total 0.7 in: 10:06" out 10:34a «0.56487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 10:40a_— out 10:52a «0.26487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Interrog responses Wednesday, September 02, 2015 - Total 5.1 in Sata out: 11:44a2.1 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 1250p out 2214p 14.6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 2:20p out:3:51p 1.6 6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Interrog responses; discussing fle with J. Lawford. ‘Thursday, September 03, 2015 - Total 4.1 in: 95144 out: 10:25 126487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in; 10:33a out 11:32a 1= 6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW 13Interrog responses: in: 11:38a—ouk 12:00p 04-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 1:04p out 1:30p —0.6.-—«6487 TNC 2015-184 REVIEW Interrogs in: 2:14p out 2:260 = 02-6487 TNC 2015-184 REVIEW Interrogs in: 2:53p out 3249 = 0.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research in; 3:31p out 3399 © 0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research Friday, September 04, 2016 - Total 0.7 in: 10:33a "out 11:10a 0.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Research (funding) ‘Tuesday, September 08, 2015 - Total 2.6 in: 9:28 out 9264 0.18487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Email from E, Sepulveda 10:26a out 10:28a «0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Email from E. Sepulveda in: 10:40a out 11.03a 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Email from E, Sepulveda; interrog responses in: 1:29p out 2;36p 1.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses and research in: 2:51p out 3:32p «07-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses and research Wednesday, September 09, 2015 - Total 3.1 in: 8:26a out 10:00a 0.6 «6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 10:16a out 10:47a_ 0S ©6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 14:04a_ out 11:59a 16487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Interrag responses in: 4:43p out 1:58p 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 2:01p out 2:20p 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 3:12p out: 3:30p «0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses ‘Thursday, September 10, 2016 - Total 1.9 in. 853a out:9:25a «08 §=— 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 9:328 out: 10:26a 0.9 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses; note to J. Lawford and C. Khoo in: 2:58p out; 3:07p 02-6487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW TC trom E. Sepulveda in-141p Out:3:20p 0.2 6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Notes from/to E. Sepulveda: discussion with and email to A, Lau Friday, September 11, 2016 - Total 1.7 in 140p out 1:54p 0.38487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses 4in: 2:03p out:2:30p 0.56487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses. in: 2:45p out 3:38 = 0.96487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses Monday, September 14, 2015 - Total 0.9 in 11:08a ‘out 11:13a 0.1. 6487 TNC. 2015-134 REVIEW Note fromito E. Sepulveda in: 211p out 2:57) 0.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses; fle management; note to file tear responses from BCBA ‘Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - Total 1.5 in: 9274 out 9282 0.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Note from E, Sepulveda and J. Lawford; schedule review call ini 1:29 out: 4:49p 0.4 | 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Reviewing file in: 4:58p out 2;58p 16487, TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Discussion with J. Lawford and stakeholders and potential expert Wednesday, September 16, 2016 - Total 4.3, in: 9:38a out 1041a 1.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 10:44a out 11:53a 12-6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 1:53p out 3499 = 26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Prepare for, and participate in call to E, Sepulveda Thursday, September 17, 2016 - Total 3.9 in: B:45a out: 9:27a «07 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses and various notes to C. Khoo and J-F Leger regarding same in 8:33 out:9:53a «0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: S540 out 10:28a 0.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in 10:31a out 14:39a 1.26487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 14:41a out: 12:00p 04-8487 TNC.2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 12:32p out 12:53p 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses in: 2:04p out 2:15p «0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses Friday, September 18, 2015 - Total 2.7 in: 9:03a out 9:32a «0.58487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs in: 10:38a out 11:36a 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs. in: 1:58p out 2:37p 0.76487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs; instructions to CK in: 241p out 2:47p 0.1. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs; fle management in: 3:25p out 3:30p = «0.18487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW TC from E. Sepulveda 15in: 3:31p out 3:46p 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses Monday, September 21, 2015 - Total 9.1 in: 8:35 out: 10:03a 1.5 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses; extensive emails in: 10:06a out: 12:21p | 236487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses; extensive emails in: 12:25p out 12:52p 0.86487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Interrog responses; extensive emails in: 1253p out 215p 1.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses; extensive emails in: 217p out:2:24p 0.2. «6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses; extensive emails in; 2:29p out 2:48p 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses; extensive emails in: 2:50p out 5:38p = 2.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrogs; fle and serve Tuesday, September 22, 2015 - Total 2.2 in: 9-103 out 9:21a 0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Interrog responses from other parties; fle management In: 9:228 (9:33a 0.2 6487 TNC 2016-134 REVIEW Interrog responses from other parties; fle management in: 10:27a out 11:01a 0.6 | 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Responses filed to interrogs; note to C. Khoo in: 1218p out 1:399 | «0.4 8487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Responses filed to interrogs in: 2208p out: 2:47p «08 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Responses filed to interrogs; note to C. Khoo Wednesday, September 23, 2015 - Total 2.3 in out’ 06487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Responses to AAC interrogs; Deficiencies in: 8:00a out 933a 0.6 = 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Responses to AAC interrogs; Deficiencies in: S420 out 11:11a' 1.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Responses to AAC interrogs; Deficiencies; various related emails; round 2 interrogatories in: 19:18a out 11:30a 0.26487 TNC 2018-134 REVIEW Responses to AAC interrogs; Deficiencies Saturday, September 26, 2015 - Total 1.4 in: 1:58 out 319p 1.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Deficiencies; various note to C. Khoo; Note to J. Lawford Monday, September 28, 2015 - Total 3.2 in: 4.588 out 556216487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Deficiencies in: 5:58a out Glia 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Deficiencies in: 6:128 out 647a 0.66487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Deficiencies; Various notes to C, Khoo In: 6:502 out: 7:63a 1.16487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Deficiencies; Various notes to C, Khoo 16in: 7:55a out 8:04a 0.26487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Deficiencies; note to J. Lawford Tuesday, September 28, 2015 - Total 1.2 in: 10:40a out 11:51a 12-6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Deficiencies; various discussions with and notes to C. Khoo Thursday, October 01, 2015 - Total 0.3 in: 8:40a out 8:58a 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW Voice mail from Xplomet; Two filings from Bell and Rogers administering file; The Total Of Each Project Since First Recorded Until Now 280.2 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW 280.2 Total wvJun 22,2016 08:49:12 Page: Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users Client Summary Date of Report Jun 22,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Oct 02, 2015 to fun22,2016 For Lawyer(s): Geoft White Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded Client ® Mat Client Name Matter Description Resp ee - Work in Progress———— Date N/B_Description Hours Fees Disb. Hours Fees Gis CRTCTNOFC 2015-138 CRTC a winnie Preparation ot GW 030 103.00 ‘documents mcevent ou07t6 Preparing second GW 220 485.20 round intervention ovosite Drafting second GW 1.00 20600 146 rating ofsecond GW oo weao ons Revieing new 310. GW 040 40 TNC, Nate 1 PIAC team? Note 0 G ‘Khoo, messaging CRTC about possible extension, ounsne Reviewing and GW 070 4420 ‘Miministering ile o1nsis Drafting sccond GW 270 $5620 ounsne Drafting second = GW 140 28840 onion ‘Second intervetion: GW 180, 370.80 research nro Reviewing summary GW 060 123.60 ‘ofsecond round interventions oni Prepare formecting GW 350 1333.00 swith PIAC an Sepulveda 3086 Organization and GW 040 8240 cond letter, note Yo PIAC fille tearm oaHrt6 Discussing hearing GW 030 103.00 swith | Lawford: ‘eiail 19 COSCO and to CAC ox09/t6 Reviciwing process, GW 030 61.80 ole trom G Langone fom B, Sepulveda 09/16 Discussing hears GW 2a 43260) wih Laird revising oral remarks, reviewing oslo Reviewing fue; Oral GW “0 226.60, remarks owisite NoteweRTce — GW 470 968.20 Pavel for hearing wanes Prepare forhearing: GW 60 32960 “ra remarks o3sie Prepare for aw 3.0 63860Jun 22, 2016 08:4 Page: Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: Client Summary Date of Report: Jum 22,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Oct 02, 2015 to Jun 22,2016 For Lawyer(s): Geoff White ort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: 1 to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded ‘Client # Mat Client Name Mant Description Resp Code Vork in Progress———— Date NB Description Hours Fees Disb. Tearing: al Hearing prep;omi GW 490 remarks omnis 1,009.40 6020 51500 oxaaie oxa5ii6 eaing preparation GW 320 Hearing preparation; GW 250 ‘arouses (oC. hoo: emis toffom Haka (xr) Fearing preparation GW 190 Prepereforhearing: GW 260 research oa ‘emaks| asa9i6 wsawie 39140 $35.60 norsie Hearing preparation, GW 260 533.60 ot oto $i: Nowe wo PLAC and E Sepulveda lien: 6487. aw 260 CRICTNOFC oxaiis 535.60 TELECOMMUNIC TIONS SERVICES, Matter Contact ERT Message Reviewing EKOS and SamKrows research im preparation for earng: ther nearing preparation earing preparation: GW 210 ote w Sepulveda Hearing preperation GW 60 Revsingorl GW 550 remarks, research hearing reparation Hearing preparation GW 10 Hearing preparation, GW 30 Preparing for GW 240 Nearing various notes and esate: reviewing brooband ‘overage map, oxainie 2200 oxoas uous a0 1,133.00 ouoans auosiis 226.60 rouao 0616 49440 VO6/16 Hearing preparation: GW 400 ‘Various nous, discussion ath PIAC, research ral remarks 834.60 ours (O76 He Hearing prepaaion GW 20 ow 260 48320 535.60Jun 22,2016 08: Page: 3 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report Jun 22,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Oct 02, 2015 to Jun22,2016 For Lawyer(s): Geoff White Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: 1 to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded Cent # Mat Client Name Matter Description Resp Se Workin Progress———— Bille —————- Date __ NIB Description Hours Fess bi Moues Fees ‘spat | remarks: various 808/16 Commission sta GW 130 267.80 leer (00116 Prepare or bering; GW 20 45520 varous emails regarding ile OUIOIRG Hearing preparation; GW 240 432.60 researh: revise ‘al remarks, noes foro, Lawford UIE Hearing preparation; GW 330 67940 ‘monitoring hearing ‘atious emails OWIVIG Heating preparation: GW 220 45320 research mentoring hearing OWIUIG Preparing or GW 160 329.60 Haring, TC 4 ator 0412/16 ———_earing preparation: GW 290 9740 eating with 3. Lawford to diseass Fearing onc hearing 04216 Heng preparation; GW 450 927.00 ‘with Lawford. A, La and E Sepulveda 042/16 Heating preparation GW 80 37080 IWAYI6 Prepare for earings GW 10 1462.60 mozting with PLAC, [ACORN and NPP a6 Prepare forbearing GW 07 14420 wwe Dacussing le with GW 160 329.60 4. Lawtoed:, ‘monitoring proceting outs Monitcing hearing GW 070 14420 outs Monitoring hearing GW 260 $3560 OWI916 Monitoring heating, GW 210 32.60 iscassng fle wth Sakehaler 420/16 ——_—isewsing ile With GW 3.00 618.00 J Lafond Monitoring hearing: 42016 Mowitoring hearing GW Lao 2840 4216 Monitoving hearing: GW 460 9760 sever cs relating to evidence W826 Monitoring hearing’; GW 310 Koo ‘various emails ran 1 Lawfird andJun 22, 2016 08: Public Interest Advocacy Centre Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 22,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Oct02,2015t@ Jun 22,2016 For Lawyer(s): Geoff White Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded ‘Client Mat Client Name Mater Deseription exp ou Work ia Progress Date __ Ni Description Hours Fees Dish, Hours Fees Dish, Sepulveda 042s Twoeals with other GW 080 1480 ‘organizations relating fle 042516 Attend hewing GW Leo 329.60 OHS ——Attendeanng GW 360 7160 0426116 Monitoring hearing GW 160 329.60 discussing hearing swith Lawford OWI6IL6 Monitoring hearing: GW 230 473.80 reviewing Jurisdictional arguments O4A7/16 Monitoring hearing GW 3.90 $03.40 DOT Monitoring esring GW 00 1420 42816 Monitoring hearing; GW 210 a0 preparing or hong debi arguments planing smesting vane Prepare for attend: GW 240 49440 Folosaps rm ‘nesting With PLAC ‘disse file and PIs undertakings, Sal comment rounds 05i02/18 Preparing outine of | GW 120 2720 Sina submission 0216 Preparing outline of GW 150 309.00 Final submission; ‘atous emails ose Revising responses GW 210 452.60 to unssitinal questions ONDKG Revising sponses GW 2k 449.08 to justia aisstions O10" ———repaing finsl GW 3.00 618.00 arguments OSV Preparing inl GW 170 33020 argos S/I2N6 Reviewing fle, GW 350 721.00 preparing ial argues: iscussing le with 1 Doneat af ‘ACORN OSI6I6 Drang it GW 300 is.00 srpumens 0s16/16———_Deaftng Fina 230 515.00 apumenis| osa7as aw 260 535.60Jun 22, 2016 08:49:12 Page: Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users 7 (Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 22,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Oct 02, 2015 to 1un22,2016 For Lawyer(s): Geoff White Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 able Time Excluded 1# Mat Client Name Matter Description Revp Code Work in Progrese—— Date NIB Description Hours Fees Disb Hours Fess Diss osi7H6 Revewigin flsand OW 050 105 00 PIAC research Drain final = GW 250 $15.00 arguments ossias Reviewing le and GW 170 35020 PIAC research oso Finalarguments GW 170 38020 sit OS/19/16 ——Finalargumens; GW 20 49440 scussing ie with © Xoo 08246 Drang and ow 400 24.00 revising fina arguments email toro Duncan of ‘ACORN (52416 eating sd aw bo 2ss.40 revising nal arguments 082916 Revising and ow 240 7680 dating Hina arguments seuss wih 9 Lunvtors 092916 Revising. drating; GW 50 030.00 and fli final arguments osrsit6 Reviewing final GW os Longo sumistons OWO2IIG Reviewing inl GW 200 412.00 sulbisions disclosure rouest owouite Reviewing fe Disclosure eaves, Nate o/ dscession sith Sava WOR Disclosure request. GW Lo 309.00 Owowte Reviewing Mle; GW 250 515.00 drain final reply 609/16 Reviewing; GW 4.00, 24.00 ing Final reply 60/16 eply aw 266 $4796 semen, Aiscusson wih Lawtord 6/10/16 Reply comments: GW 2.00 a0 note oJ Lawford: TC few Sepulveda Note to ealiton members (11/16 ina ey ow 030 164.40 ener: erate froma Save write Finalize and fle GW Final reply comments 200 41200 659.20Jun 22, 2016 08:49:12 Page: 6 Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users 7 (Client Summary Date of Repos Jun 22,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Oct 02,2015 fo Jun 22,2016 For Lawyer(s): Geoff White Sort by: Alphabetic Client Ran; 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded Client Mat Client Name Matter Description Reap Code Date NIB Description Hours Fees Disb, Hours Fees Cry Reviewing fiat GW 060 1360 reply comments estas Reviewing fiat GW so 309.00 reply comments ‘Total Cleat: 2194 45,659.64 00000 00 bo a9 43,699.64 6.0 aa 0.00 00Bey] S2tadian Radio-television ant ‘Telecommunicatons Commission PIC HIE SAT] CRTC Telecom N of C 2015-134 Roviow of basic telecommunications services FORM | - SUMMARY OF LEGAL FEES Applicant: [PIAGIGACIACORNINFICOSCG Claimant: Geka Lawiord Employment status of claimant, as reported tothe law society (ie) of which the claimant is a member Private Practica Cleimants Tie: Aricing Student [7] {check one} Legal Assistant [=] Dole when qualified as alaw cerkor porelegat, | [7 Legal Counsel EX] For egal counsel thet ae nat n-hovse: Completed years of practice: (BE Year of Cal tothe Bar 1092 Hos the lawyer practised continual since Cat The Bar? ves No (tFno, provide details and explanations on a separate sheet) Rate Claimed: [$25000;perRour [SERVICE ME CLAIMED FEE CLAIMED Wicraseray wands | (tena mane) nbosie sevens PREPARATION: fee ho [Review File 3 [2,967.00 Rovcrch : ss00 Prevae Undertings ES eran Drtnsnowentos Comments Hae fara Prete nverton coments 2 38 bsstson Dratng terogatny Responses ez Gonarcing wh spe an por es feats 90— Proves er Hoare es fatto enrages ord tt fe ann repos urecond snows fe D0 ; LE a rennance: eam bostg nF oe ret i PROCEDURAL oss Arsen on as NaratonAogeaton one (specify): A s lroraL re CLAMED: HRS 195.16 TAL FEES res Fao TAREE (estel TPst eT I HST@ [i3%|) 156,980.56. [HST Allowable Claimed] [$2,176.38 HOTA CCAR san | certiy thatthe above information is true and accurate, Date: Sianature of sian CRTC ASE 2010-12) version rancaise dapenive — CanadaJun 28,2016 09:36:18 Page: | Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): John Lawford Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: to 199 Non-billable Time Fxeluded ‘Glent# Mat Client Name Matter Desription Resp ‘ode Date NIK Description Hours Pees Gis) ERTCTNOPC 20154134 CRTC ab OWRIIS Conference with JL 040 ti6.00 exper. SWS Correspondence SL 10 406.00 with expert osmosis Reviewo NOC, Ih ow 261.00 previous Proveedings on osioras Review ile, 4 110 319.0 osituis Review ile a 080 232.00 OSMULS Survey design with JL 2.00 80.00 expert OSES Confrence with aL 220 634.00 expert clint and lawyers tte, survey, report sits Review file a 080 232.00 OS2V/1S Confrence with ES, IL Lio 319.00 AL, GW.IFL te report and egal ‘questions oasis Confersnsewith JL 1.00 290.00 client ACORN re Tow income sss osnasis Review ofexper, 60 174.00 report fist dat sz Confrencewith aL. Lo 319.00 expea report ows Reviewafexpet aL 030 87.00 report Q6l09s ———Resenreh-OTS and 3 hao 406.00 BSO O6iNa"IS——Comespondense 060 17400 svth expert OsS/IS————ResearcheBSO 140 406.00 sand obligation to 67S ———Reseuch of BSO. I 10 493.09 wir Reseach B50 IL 190 551.00 andOTs, 68S rating of a 10 319.00 intervention OWI9IES Drang of a 060 17400 comments for imerverion, 6281S Reviewofenpert I Lao 3400 "spor. 6231S Confrence with JL 090 261.00 {GW reexpen repoJun 28,2016 09: Page: 2 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): John Lawford. Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: 1 to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded Client ® Mat Client Name Matter Deserption Code Date NIM Description Hours Disb, Hours Fees Disb, 62915 ——_Drlting of aL 110 comments 26/15 Drafting of a 030 uso i205 Reseach eOTS 080 23200 sand BSO. ospons Resewch 2 B80 JL 030 87.00 and OTS, 0612095 Dating of 4 060 7400 Iatersention ow2mas Drafting of a 110 19.00 ona rating of a, 10 319.010 Onis rating of n 7230 2.1700 imterverin, anioss Drafing of an 020 sx.00 070615 Dang of 0 1.00 290.00 77) 0 1.60 464.00 ononis 4 240 609.00 070815 rating of aL 190 ssi.00 Dns Review of aL 240 696.00 OnIOIS——_Reviewor 4. 030 2987.00 OTIS Reviewor a 770 2233.00 orauns Preparation for and J 170 493.00 meting re ners, ognuis Review of a 160 464.00 intemogatoris rafting replies, uwaeis Drafting of mn 400 290.00 Interogatory responses, oxas Dating of a 060 i740 Inerrogatory respons, osnwis rating of 1 030 145.00 imerrogatory osy3ys rating of H 050 145.0 ImerrozaoryJun 28,2016 09:36:19 Page: 3 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): John Lawford Sort by: Alphabetic (Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: 1 to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded ‘Glen Mat Client Name MavterDestripion Resp Code = Work in Progress Date NAY Description Hours Fees Dish. Hours Fees Disb. ogous rating of " 10 35.00 interogatary owas Drafting of a 040 116.00 imterogatory responses, noma Drain of u 90 121.00 inkerogatory wOMIS Drang of a. 10 319.00 Interogatony e91u1S Dating of a 130 x00 smterognory response oviows Drafing of n 180 22.00 Imteropatory responses oviians Review ot N 220 28.00 nrogatory D9RIS Review oF H 130 377.00 imerrogaory responses loss Letert@ CRTC re Ls0 435.00 Smtr costs ey 12216 rating of second aL 330 957.00 012916 Drang ofseeond aL 200 638.00 (201/16 Review ina ra I. 800 232000 of second (22916 Reviewofexpect 930 14800 reponts Round 2 (90816 Preparation for 3.0 #7000 hearing meeting with expert and lawyer) 0916 Review oF ea oral JL no 319.00 remarks OVAIG Preparation for 220 638.00 hearing. OXA4/16 Meeting with IAC JL 80 522.00 team BS heating state, 3296 Preparation for SL, 240 696.00 hearing 360/16 Prepattion or 000) 17400Jun 28, 2016 09; Public Interest Advocacy Centre Client Summary Date of Report Jun28,2016 Report by: Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: Area of Law Range: Non-billable Time Excluded Page: 4 Users 7 Working Lawyer John Lawford 6487 to 6487 t to 199 Client Mat Cheat Name Mater Description Resp Code Dae NB Description Fees Disb, Hours Fees Dish, OwosIe———Prepartion or ‘800 2320.00 hearing. 140616 ——raRingoforst tL 220 638.00 remarks OWORIIG ———Reviewofwal IL Lo 319.09 remarks ovo9it6 reparation for IL 430 1305.00 hearing CHING reparation ie 440 1.27600 hearing WIV Attending a hearing. J 610 1,349.00 OWING Preparation fr IL 200 109.00 hing O36 Preparation oe IL 140 2.14800 heating 4316 Adending a hearing. JL 10 2,059.00 canans Preparation for JL 100 29000 heating anise Research aL 060 17400 iutisdiction in France. Spain and US atordatlity funds abonpement social Lin), DIN9/6 Preparation of 180 522.00 vnerahings, OWI Attending at hearing. 3. 30 870.00 042016 Prepuaionof =. 080 Ms.00 tnderahings 0421/16 Adending at hearing. JL 580 1.39800 O4DDAG ——_Aending at earng. J 40 1276.00 0426/16 Attending at hearing. J 20 800 O46 Preparation 90 ssi.o0 response 19 Jurisdictional ‘question. 042916 Preparation of 10 435.00 jurisdictional Prepastionor 200 380.00 junsietional Osi0KIG ——Prepartionof 160 46400 jurdictional 061018 ———Reviewof final 160 17400 reply. 08/27/16 Prepare inl costs IL 60 46400 claim, 62816 Anending ac hearing. I 280) a2.00Jun 28, 2016 09:36:19 Page: 5 Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactio Jan 01,2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): John Lawford Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 ble Time Excluded ‘Mat_Clieat Name Matter Destripion Resp See Work i Progreso Date __ N/R Description Hows Fess Disb otal Cleat: 18540 $3,766.00 00 (On 000) 00 Grand Totals 188.40 53,766.00 0.0 090| Cenatian Raciottoision ana ‘Telecommunications Commission PIC Fie FeaT—] CRTC Telecom N of € 2015-134 Review of bs eocommunteations srvces FORM | - SUMMARY OF LEGAL FEES Alicante Calan Employment sas of daiant 5 repoted tthe law sociely (is) of which he claimant is a member Claimant's Title: Articling Student [—] (check one} Legal Assistant [—] Date when qualified as a low clerk or paralegal: $= [___] Legal Counsel [xX] For tga curl that at at tu Completed yeas pracoe, BB Year of Galt the Bar: 07 Haste ler rated connly snes Cato We Ba? ves EE ne (tr, eove dts rd exports ona separa shoe) Rate Claimed: SERVICE FTiME CLAIMED FEE CLAIMED use quater day increments for | [say or nurs x ate) house serace) PREPARATION te ee Review Fe iF O7aEaD Research Brat Comments baa lezaa0 brat itrogs and Responses pe irezr 00 FReviow ard Revue Corments repre fr heating bran Fnt Commons [Gonut with Cet cevlo stony iar ieeaa0 [Gove management [Sonmonts fi Ee fs larrenpance: ato petra | Other (specify): 5 E lpRoceDURAL: costs Aootcaton xan Apalcabon |Other (specify): * b is [TOTAL TE CLAMED: 70.4 NOTAL FEES: SERIES ad TAKES (csT@] [Pst @] I HST@ [13%|) [$4,162.00 HST Allowable Ciaimed]) [$1,261.43 {STACCTARE iszr743 cert ha the above infomation s tue and accurate. Date: HOTEROTS Signatre ofclmant ERA, ‘anadit CRTC 43€ (2010-12) version tancaise depontte «= Canadafl time reports to 9 oct 2015. txt Traxtime report for Jean-Francois Leger created 10/14/3015 11:10 aM Thursday, Apri] 09, 2015 - Total 1.1 in: 1:12a out: 12:17p 1.1 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review file sunday, april 12, 2015 - Total 3.8 in: 1:45p. out: 4:14p 2.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review file in: 4:26p out: 5:35p 1.2. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review file Monday, April 13, 2015 - Total 5.7 in: 8:04a out: 9:24 1.4” 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review file (analyse precedents, studies) in: 9:53a out: 11:36a "1.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review File in: 1:23p. out: 1:56p 0.6 © 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review file in: 2:01p out: 3:52p 1.9 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW consult client re: strategy uesday, Apri} 21, 2015 = Total 3.8 ins 2 out: 12:28 0.5 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review file in: 1:31p out: 3:16p 1.8. 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW discuss and develop’ strategy with’ Vent int 3238p out: 4:39p 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review file int 4243p out: 5:03p 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review file Friday, April 24, 2015 - Total 0.9 in: 3:26p out ip 0.9 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review file Monday, May 04, 2015 ~ Total 2.5 in: 1:10p out: 3:39p 2.5" 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW plan strategy thursday, May 07, 2015 ~ Total 0.8 in: 2318p out: 2:43p 0.5 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review file nz 2:4ap gut: 3:01p 0.3 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW draft note to client wednesday, May 13, 2015 = Total 2.9 a: out: 11:51a 0.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW fevien file. (meeting ree) nz 2:02p out: 4:06 2.1 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW develop strategy meeting wednesday, Nay 30, 2015. Total 24 0.7” 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW in 1249p out: review file in: 2:02p out: develop strategy 2Ip 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW cs thursday, May 21, 2015 - Total 1.6 in: 2:57p out: 4:28p 1.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW develop proceeding strategy re: bso Page 1jf] time reports to 9 oct 2015.txt Friday, June 05, 2015 - Total 1.1 in: 10:00a out: 11:0la «1.16487 TNC 2015-134 Tuesday, June 09, 2015 - Total 2.2 ins 1:34p, out: 3:08p) 1.6 "6487 TNC 2015-134 review file in: 3:1 out: 3:43p 0.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 review file Wednesday, June 10, 2015 - Total 1.8 in: 9:31a out: 9:57a 0.5 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft comments ‘in: 10:00a out: 11:13a 1.3 6487 TNC 2015-134 meeting with client re review, set strategy Wednesday, June 17, 2015 - Total 3.2 in: 1:28p out: 1:45p 0.3 6487 TNC 2015-134 review file in: 1:53p out: 2:53p 1 6487 TNC 2015-134 review file ‘in: 3:04p out: 4:21p 1.3 6487 TNC 2015-134 review file in: 4:26p out: 5:02p 0.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 review file Thursday, June 18, 2015 - Total 5 in: 10:18a out: 10:36a 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 draft_conments int 11:22a out: 12:4p 1.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft comments in: 2:04p out: 4:06p 2.1 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft comments in: 4:45p out: 5:57 1.2 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft comments Friday, June 19, 2015 - Total 5.6 in: 8:49a out: 10:14a 1.56487 TNC 2015-134 draft comments in: 10:38a out: 12:03p «1.5 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft, conments ‘in: 12:08 out: 12:27p 0.46487 TNC 2015-134 review file in: 1:53p out: 4:02p 2.2 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft conments June 22, 2015 - Total 3.9 in: da: out: 12:18 = 1.3” "6487 TNC 2015-134 review file in: 1:49p out: 4:20p 2.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 review file . tuesday, June 23, 2015 - Total 1.2 in: 2:24p out: 3:34p 1.2 > 6487 TWe 2015-134 draft conments wednesday, June 24, 2015 - Total 2.9 in: 9:32a out? 10:132 "0.7 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft comments in: 2:41p out: 4:24p 1.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft comments ‘in: 5:01p. out: 5:23p 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 review file Page 2 REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEWfl time reports to 9 oct 2015. txt Thursday, june 25, 2015 - Total 4.4 in: 10:11a out: 11:272 «1.3 6487 TNC review File (re:Northwestel) in: 11:34a out: 12:01p «0.56487 TNC review file (re: NWT) in: 2225p out: 3:19p 0.9 6487 TNC review file in: 3:32 out: 4:47p 1.3 6487 TNC review File ‘in: 5:10p out: 5:33p 0.4 6487 TNC draft comments > Friday, June Total 6.6 in: 8:47a out: 9 1.16487 TNC draft comments in: 10:47a out: 1.9 6487 TNC draft comments in: 1:58p out: 0.2 6487 TNC draft comments ‘in: 2: 14p out: 3.2 6487 TNC draft comments in: 5:34p out: 0.2 6487 TNC review file sunday, June 28, 2015 - Total 1.1 in: 4:03p out: 5:079 1.1 "6487 Te review file . Monday, June 29, 2015 - Total 7.2 in: 8:04a out: 9:28a 1.4 "6487 TNC draft comments jn: 9:43a out: 10:22a 0.76487 TNC draft comments jn: 1i:16a out: 12:23p 1.26487 TNC draft comments int 1:45p out: 3:36p 1.9 6487 TNC draft comments in: 3:42p out: 5:38p 2 6487 TNC draft comments | Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - Total 4.2 ‘in: 8:49a out: 9:48a 1 6487 TNC draft summaries for client review in: 11:34 out: 2:35p 3.1 6487 TNC develop draft meeting ‘in: 3:36p out: 3:42p 0.1 6487 TNC review draft . Wednesday, July 01, 2015 - Total 0.3 in: 10:49 out: 11:074 0.36487 TNC respond to client email re strategy Friday, July 31, 2015 - Total 1.5 in: 10:02a out: 11:32a -5 6487 TNC develop and review strategy meeting Thursday, August 06, 2015 - Total 6.2 in: 9:23a out: 10:36a, 1.3 6487 TNC review file in: 12:03p out: 1:02p 1 6487 TNC draft. interrogs in: 2:06p. out: 2:42p 0.6 6487 TNC review file Page 3 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 2015-134 REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW Review REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEWfl time reports to 9 oct 2015.txt in: 2:48p out: 3:46p 1 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrogs in: 3:52p, out: 4:16p 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 review File in: 4232p out: 6:23p 1.9 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrogs Friday, August 07, 2015 - Total 3.7 ‘in: 9:04a, out: 9:58a 0.9 6487 TNC 2015-134 review file in: 11:39 out: 12:37p 1 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrogs ‘in: 12:39p out: 12:587 0.4 ©6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrogs ‘in: 2:03p out: 3:24p 1.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrogs Tuesday, August 11, 2015 - Total 0.6 ‘in: 10:02a out: 10:384 "0.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 review interrogs, strategy meeting Thursday, August 13, 2015 - Total 0.3 in: 4:56 out: 5:10p 0.36487 TNC 2015-134 reviewed /corrections re: interrogatories Friday, August 14, 2015 ~ Total 0.4 in: 8:02a out: 8:23a 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft memo to client re strategy , Monday, August 24, 2015 - Total 0.7 in: 4:31p out: 5208p 0.7 6487 TNC 2015-134 review file (re: interrogs) Tuesday, August 25, 2015 - Total 1.6 in: _3:10p out: 4:46p 1.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 review file Wednesday, August 26, 2015 - Tota] 4.2 in: 8:16a out: 8:23a 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrog reply ‘in: 9:27a Out! 10:12a 0.86487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrog response in: 11:21a out: 12:07p 0.8» 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrog response ‘in: 2:29p out: 3:54p 1.5 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrog response in: 4:16p out: 4:36p 0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrog response ‘in: 5:26p out: 5:56p 0.5 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrog response thursday, August 27, 2015 - Total 4.2 in: 8:46a out: 9:58a 1.2 6487° TNC 2015-134 draft interrog response in: 10:21a out: 12:20p 2 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrog response in: 1:38p out: 2:36p 1 6487 TNC 2015-134 draft interrog response Friday, August 28, 2015 - Total 5.5 in: 8:30a out: 9:33a 1.1” 6487 TWe 2015-134 draft interrog response in: 10:18a out: 11:04a 0.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 page 4 REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW REVIEWJfl time reports to 9 oct 2015.txt draft interrog response in: 1:03p out: 1:29p 0.5 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW review File in: 1:30p out: 2:51p 1.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW respond to interrogatory ‘in: 4214p out: 5:18 1.1 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW draft interrog response ‘in: 5:29p out: 6:02p 0.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW draft interrog response Monday, August 31, 2015 - Total 4.7 in: 8:59a out: 11:03a 2.1 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW draft interrog response in: 11:28a out: 12:27p 1 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW draft interrog response in: 1:07p out: 1:24» 0.3 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW draft interrog in: 1:49p out: 2:20p 0.6 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW draft interrogs in: 3:18p out: 3:57p 0.7 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW draft interrog response Tuesday, September 01, 2015 - Total 0.8 in: 3:50p_ out: 4:36p 0.8 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW modifications to interrog response Wednesday, September 16, 2015 - Total 0.7 in: 12:14p out: 12:56p 0.7 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW draft interrog responses Thursday, September 17, 2015 - Total 0.4 in: 9:42a out: 10:02a "0.4 6487 TNC 2015-134 REVIEW consult with client re:strategy matter Totals From Thursday, January 01, 2015 To Friday, October 09, 2015 210.4 6487’ TNC 2015-134 REVIEW 10:4 Total Page 5Canadian Radiotelesion nd Hee Teccommunicatons Commission Perera —] RTE Telecom W of € 2015-134 Review of baste elecommunleations srvces FORM | — SUMMARY OF LEGAL FEES Aoplcant: | BIACICACTACORNNPFICOSA Claimant: (Aialataa———] Employment status of camant as reported tothe Jaw society (es) of which the daimant i a member Claimants Tie: Aricing Student [=] {check one} Logal Assistant [=] Date vhen qualified as alaw clerk or paralegal: § [Td Legal Course! BZ] For egal counsel that sre rot inhouse: Completed years of practice: Year of Cal tothe Ba Has the auyerpracised continually since Calta Te Bar? Yes No (tn, provide detais and extenations ona separate shoot) Rate Claimed: SERVICE TIME CLAIMED FEE CLAIMED (Use quarter-day increments tor | |(days or hows xrate) intouse service) PREPARATION: i or Hours Review Fie [aso |Research . & Drafting Undertakings: 4 [3,750.00 Jorat and Prepare intervenion 800.00 Procedural eter & conterng with cient 300.0, Draft and Prepare Intervention 2nd round 00.00 Prepare for hearing 300.00 [Drafting Interrogs and Responses c= =] 00, Searing of Haring 7 [Case managementteam conferences Za 700.00 Jcomments i be A JATTENDANcE: latent neering [27 oo. em (specify): 2 PRoceDURAL: Costs Application Taxaon Appication otter (pect 1 2 S lroraL nme CLAMED: dys (123) TOTAL FEES: sia f00.00 id TAKES! (Stal steal cae [HST Alowabte Ciaimed] TOTAL CLAIM: a 10000 | cery that the above information is tue and accurate Date: [TT Signature of claimant: ae CRTC 43€ (2010-12) version francaise disponible \CanaditJun 28,2016 08:27:49 Page: Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to. ‘Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Alysia Law Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded Client ® Mat Client Name Mater Desrption Resp o Work in Pores Dare NM_Deserption Hours Fees Dish, Hours Fees Dish, Gx7— CRIETNOPE205434 CRTC ae OWOS ——RevieworRNC AL 07 07 document OwvIS——— Rescarh. al 070 070 DWI Confrence with AL 190) 190 GW.1B,JFLand KS, OWNWIS ——Evidenes gerne? AL ow 000 Design survey and research asks, OWLVIS——Prepmaton ef AL 020 020 predurl ete. OWIWIS——Prepuraionot AL 080 050 proved eter. OVIIS Dating of al 20 020 procederl lense OVE Preparation ent AL 030 030 tees OULSIS———Evence gatherings AL 110 Lio Design suey OMNIS Evideose pacing: AL a0 610 Suey design Outs Conferencewith AL M40 10 GW, KS: Survey ese OWLS Prepurionof AL 080 0x0 prover ete, DUIS Evidence gathoring: AL 10 100 Svey desi QUIS Evidence gathering: AL 02 020 Suey design. 42018 Evidence gatherings AL 040 wo Suey design 4175 Conferencewih st, AL 1480 1.80 ‘GW. IB,KS. JFL Osis Reseach a 0 0 O45 Drahingof x 020 020 recede, 0422715 Comespodenee AL 020 020 ‘wth een O4av1S Evidence gatherings AL 1.00 00 Survey design O4QWIS Conference with AL Lio L0 {GW and KS suey ‘espn 1rd Evidence gathering: AL 030 030 Sueveydesian oaawis——Revieworfle. AL 030 030 OWS Preparation of AL 030 030 clineJun 28, 2016 Page: 2 Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users 7 Client Summary Date of Report Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: an 01,2015 t@Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s) Alysia Lau Sort by Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 fo 6487 ‘Area of Law Range: | fo 199 Non-billable Time Excluded ‘Cent Mat Chen Name Maer Description Resp oe Work in Progeese———— Date __ Ni Description Hours Fes Dis, Hours Fes Dis warlis Reseach rn 090 090 (W2WIs vides gaderings AL. 020 020 Save desin C3415 Confnse wih JL, AL. 210 210 (OWIFLAIB.S Gsm Preparation AL on 10 procedural te. (SM4/is vider gathering: AL 020 o20 Sivey denen sis Evidence guherings AL. oo om reparation of snes. OSILUIS Conference wih JL AL 200 200 fn ES. re sey desian Os/LVIS vere gerne? AL 10 10 ‘Suney desi ONS Confrence wih sL. AL 20 220 Walt, KSB, s Osis Research a 190 190 (sists Research x 0 170 Gsiisris Reseach aL 130 150 C1978 Drang of at 080 090 OSS Dring ot aL a0 310 Os2018 Dring aL oso ow OOS Research AL ox0 oso 052015 Reseach AL ao oa 052015 Dango Al 130 10 Os2115 Dating of AL 130 130 OSI Sunveydesion. AL, 100 100 osavns a 70 o70 Os2vis——Pepartion ot AL oo oo OSVIS ——Conterenge wih IL. AL 130 (0 owes S228 Suneydesign. AL 020 020 seats Reseach wu oso 030 Us22ns Resto a oo 080 WHOS Conerence eh, AL 0 14 (GW. KSB, CS ard FL tts Review offi. AL 060 060Jun 28,2016 08:27:49 Page: 3 Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyers) Alysia Law Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded Client Mat Client Name Matter Desiption Resp sae Work in Progress Si Date NB Desert Hours ees Dib, Hours Fees Dis OWITAS———_-ReviewoFsuney Al 030 030 resus OwITs Preparation AL 60 060, survey results, OWIRIS Preparation of =A Lao 180 survey ress ORS Prepartion of = AL 280 280 survey resus, (W191 Prepartion of =A 30 130 survey sul 62315 ———Reviewafnesearch, AL ay 040 Wass Reviewof fle =A 010 0 awa6is Prepantion sf AL 040 040 6261s Preparmtion of AL. 00 109 oa0ns aL 3.0 300 650/15 Cayrespondence AL ox as with lens 702s Cerrexpondence AL oa 40 with lens oronis Preparation AL os) 40 7025 Comtespondence AL 030 030 with cents nevis Preparationof AL 190 190 appendin to rors Proparationof AL o20 020 ‘Sepulvida expe report Preparatonof AL 130 130 ‘Sepulvia expe sport Ons reparation AL 140 Lao Sepulvis expen reper. OTTIS——Preparaionof AL 030 030 Sepulvida expat ‘pone ‘espace with exper ovows Conference with IAL 050 os0 and GW. OnR/IS Preparation ofA 200 200 appendix to ftv onws Preparation of AL 70 a0 ‘appendix to oroais Preparation of = AL ow 040Jun 28,2016 08:27:49 Page: 4 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 (Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Alysia Lau Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded Client Mat Client Name Code Date NIB _Deserption Hours appendix wo oss esearch AL 060 060 ornisas Review ofother AL, 040 40 (Review ie, ons04s Revieworotier AL 030 030 interventions Review ile), e730 Reviewofoter AL 40 140 interventions OBIS Conference with AL 130 30 opis Review ofresponses AL 030 030 JoCRTC RFs {Review file, ovasns Review oftesponses AL 100 1.00 foCRTCREs Aeview ile owasits Review ofother AL 1.00 100 (ODSIIS———Preparatonoh = AL 130 180 interrogates. coupons Preparation of AL 230 230 dmtrrogatonis, OwiDWitS Preparation oF = AL 20 020 Inerogatones uot Preparation = AL na 020 Jmrratoies OSS Conference with JL, AL Loo 1.00 GW, 3PL, ES and cK. OWI9IS Review ofinerops A 030 030 to the Affordable ‘Access Coalition WIS ——_—ReviewoFinermes. AL 020 020 QWI9IS ——Covrespondense A 30 030 with expert 082015 ating of Au 140 140 responses to imerogs. wens Drafting of A 2.0 200 responses to tmerrogse ows Drafting of AL 010 910 responses to inceroes. owas rating of AL 960 000 respomes to introgs Ox2V1S rating of AL 070 ow responses to IntenossJun 28, 2016 Page: Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Inelude Transactions; Jan 01, 2015 to Jun 28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Alysia Law Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded Cheat # Mater Description Resp Work in Progress Date Hours Fees Disb Dish. TwaWIs Drafing of aL 080 oso responses to intros oxnwis Dating of Al 040 040 responses 10 interogs oxstis Dating of AL 070 070 responses 10 inero3s ovo Preparation of AL 40 040 responses 10 Interogs. ovinins iting rexponses AL 07 070 imterrogs. VIS —_—Reviewofreqponses AL 040 040 to inerogs, wawis Revi of responses AL, 130 130 to iors, oasis Reviow ofresponses AL 060, 60 ro neg. onrons Review of esponses AL 060 060 ro mies, ninwas Preparation? AL ou a0 responses to eros, uasas Preparation AL on 070 responses to imerogs, Hipeas Preparation of = AL 0.10 610 fesponses to dnerres 09s Conference with AL 00 100 GW and CK strategy meating and Timeline for spcoming Jeane OWT Pepsin oF da AL 220 220 ‘of section fo esond 1286 Drang session AL L70 170 loftoterenion DIBRI6 Dealing of Al 280 280 imervenion 12916 Review of AL 020 020 intervention oatine 12916 rating of secon AL. 200 2.00 ‘of intervention D126 rai ofsetion AL. 180 130 ‘of itersenion N2I01/16 Review of AL 010 010 Anterventons ied by othe paris bmpvie —Reviewat file AL 020 omJun 28,2016 08: Public Interest Advocacy Centre (Client Summary Date of Repor Jun 28,2016 Report by: Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: Area of Law Range: Non-billable Time Exeluded Page: 6 User: 7 Working Lawyer Alysia Lau 6487 to 6487 I to 199 Ghent Mat Code MatierDeseripfon Resp Workin Progress: Date __NIB_Deseripnion Hours Fees Dish Hours Fees Disb, WONG Conference with il, AL 110 110 GW.CK and JB Suategi planning, reparation fr hearing O36 Conference with AL 270 270 IAC team and ES - preparation for hearing O3AV16 ——Reviewofand = AL 09 as editing of remarks, W524 Conference with AL 30 h80 PIAC team - stacey set fo eatin ozone Preprwion fir AL 130 130 searing. 029116 Preparation for AL 170 170 Searing «preparation ot questions for exper 05/30/16 Preparation for AL 60 060 hearing - Preparation ot questions for een 030016 Preparation for AL 020 om hearing - review fF record (3016 Preparation x AL 020 020 an N36 ——Revisionafor At oxo oxo temasks OWS —Prepartion for AL 130 10 heating. WOW Prepac for AL, oso 050 hearing DOS Prepartion for AL, 090 090 heating, DUG Preparation or AL, 030 030 he (WW06)16 ——Prepurtion for Al 080 0x0 heating research OUOSIIG Preparation for AL 030 030 heating OWOHILG Preparation for AL 030 030 hoaring (OWS Preparation for AL 60 10 hearing = develop prep questions. OHO6/N Preparation fe AL 110 Lo hearing = preparation of ansters hypothe vestsJun 28,2016 08:27:50 Page: 7 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to Jun 28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Alysia Law Sort by; Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded ‘Glen Mat_Cliewt Name Mauicr Description Resp aon Work S Bile. Date NIB Description Hours Disb, Hoare Fees Disb. www Prcpantionfor AL 090 090 eatng = preparation ot potential, ‘uestions and ow086 Prepuration for AL 050 050 heating exons Preparation for AL 030 030 hearing OWOWIS reparation of oral AL 030 030 remaeks ONG Adending st aring. AL 400 400 OWII6——Preparationfor AL O40 040 hearing OWN —— Conference with JL, AL 80 Lo GWand ES preparation for hearing WIZ Preparationfor AL 030 30 hearing O16 Preparation fr AL Lo 130 hearing ‘Streaming of aL 030 030 eating ours Streaming of Al 020 om hearing, OuI3N6 Conference with AL 250 290 ‘AAC tam ‘preparation for heating outsns Prepcationfor AL 070 070 hearing OWLAit6 ——Atendingand AL 600 600 presentation at hearing OWING Sueaming of AL 080 oso earn, OVIRG Steaming of A 080 050 hearing v0 Steaming AL nao ao huang 0426 Sueamingof A 050 050 hearing 0x16 Reseach. Al. 180 180 D816 Steaming of Al 030 030 hearing, DHS Reseach, Al 170 Lo 0426 Streaming oF Al 030 030 earng. (W216 Research for AL 10 10 sunderkins OWING Preparation AL. 1a 1380Jun 28,2016 08:27:50 Page: 8 Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Alysia Lau Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 ‘Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded Gent Mat Clieot Name Maier Description Resp oan Wark i Progr led — Date NAH Description Hours Fees Dis, Hours Fees Dish, underakings. Ouse Sueamingof AL one 080 hearing onsite Drang of Al 40 040 lanerahings. O4S6 Steaming of Al 030 030 hewring 012516 rating of AL 170 170 ‘anders ourz6n6 Drafting oF at 140 140 undertakings owr2sii6 Research for AL 250 250 detains 42916 Conference with IL, AL 130 130 GW and CK strategy meeting for Final submussons, 042916 Drafting of AL 1x0 180 undertakings 02/15 Research Al 130 130 tundrakings 52/6 Research or AL 040 oso snerakins. serie rating of AL 120 120 wonder DSN Review oF responses AL, on ToCRTC questions OSOUI6 Review of Al 030 uinderiakngs, 082016 Preparation of final AL 10 140 writen subs, 605/16 Preparation of inal AL 020 020 reply Total Client 15780 167.50 om UMD 00. 000 Grand Tota 1650 16750 00 0m 0.00 4.00Hp] Cenaden Rado-teievsion and TTelecommunications Commission PIC Hie eaeT___] RTC Telecom N of C 2015-134 Roview of basic telecommunications services FORM I - SUMMARY OF LEGAL FEES. Applicant: (PIAGICACIACORNNPICOST Ciaimant Employment stats of claimant, a3 reported tote Low soda (es) of which the claimants a member Claimants The: Arcng Student [] (check one): Loge Assistant GE] Dasvin quiet srceteredet Sy Legal Counsel ForTagal counsel that are not in-house: ‘Completed years of practice: Year of Callto the Bar: Has the lawyer practised continually since Calo be Bar? Yes No (ifn, provide details and explanations on separate shoo!) Rate Ciaimed: [SERVICE [TIME CLAIMED FEE CLAIMED (Use quarterday increments for | |(¢ays or hours xrate) in-house services) PREPARATION. Days or Hours Review Fie Research EL rea [Summarize Submissions Has 167.50, Eating & Citations ei i437 50 [Review and Revise Comments Prepare for hearing Draft Final Comments [Request for Disclosure [Case management zz jaa [Comments i. lz ls. JATTENDANCE: Attend hearing ote (speci) 1 lz lPROCEDURAL: |Costs Application Taxation Applicaton Jother (speci 1 le Is lrora Te came: DAYS 26 [roar FEES: 1s 550000 ‘Add TAKES! eral Testa [ste TSH [HST Aiowabie Craimed)y [TOTAL GLARE 5350000 | cory thatthe above information is true and accurate. Date: |] Signature of ciaimant: c. see e ‘CRTC 43€ (2010-12) version tancaise dsponioo = Canad’Monday, June 8 11am - lpm; 2pm - Spm: 4107 - Research and writing ‘Tuesday June9 9am - 11am; 2pm - Spm: 4107 - Editing and citations Wednesday June 10 9am - lpm; 2pm - Spm: 4107 - Editing and citations ‘Thursday June 11 Sam - Ipm; 2pm - Spm: 4107 - Editing and citations Friday June 12 12pm - Ipm; 2pm - Spm: 4107 - Research and writing Monday June 15 Sam - 1pm: 4107 - Editing and citations ; 2pm - Spm: 6487 - Background research — 3 A&S~ ‘Tuesday June 16 Tam - 1pm; 2pm - Spm: 6487-Research - 5 APS~ Wednesday June 17 9am - 11:00am: 6487 - Research - 2 APS - 11:00am - 2pm: 6505 - Research and meeting with client ‘3pm - Spm: 6487 - Research for Edgardo = 2 ars. ‘Thursday June 18: 9am - 12pm: 6487 - Research for Edgardo - 3h” Ipm - 5pm: 6487 - Research for Edgardo - «/ A?'S - Friday June 19: ‘ Sam - 12pm: 6487 - Research for Edgardo - 3A ee “i Ipm - Spm: 6487 - Research for Edgardo - “/ "5 * ‘Monday June 22: 9am - 12pm; 1-Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions » 7 AS - Tuesday June 23: Sam - 12pm; 1-Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions . 7 APS Wednesday June 24: Sam - 12pm; 1-Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions - 7 47S »‘Thursday June 25: 5am - 12pm; 1-Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions = "7 APS + Friday June 26: 9am = T2pm; 1-Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions - 7A?S - Monday July 6: G hours: 6487-Research - 6 47'S Tuesday July 7: Zz Ghours:6487-Ressarcn - 64S Wednesday July 8: hours: 6487 -Research — ©445 ‘Thursday July 9: hours: 6487 -Research - O4/°S Friday July 10: so. Shows: 6487-Research--@ 47 Monday July 13: 10am - 12pm; Ipm - 7pm: 6487 -Editing and citations. - FAS - ‘Tuesday July 14: TOam - 12pm; Ipm - 6pm: 6487 - Editing and citations - CAPS + ‘Thursday July 16: 1am - 12pm; Ipm - Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions - G44? « Monday July 20: hrs 10am - 12pm; 1pm - Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions ~ . Tuesday July 21; 10:00am - 12pm; Ipm - Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions - 647"), Wednesday July 22: 4S 10am - 12pm; 1pm - Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions ~ 9 ‘Thursday July 23: Ghus. Sam - 12pm; 1pm - 4pm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions ~Friday July 24: a 10am - 12pm; Ipm - Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions ~ Chi. Monday July 27: 10am - 12pm; Ipm - Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions = GAPS. Tuesday July 28: -Y. C Ars. 10am - 11am; 1:30pm - Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions Wednesday July 29: 10am - 12pm; 1pm - Spm: 6487 - Summarizing other submissions > 6 AG. ‘Thursday July 30 Ham 12pm; 2pm—4pm — 9 A479 ¢ 6487 ~ Research and editing 4pm — Spm Lhe 6487 — Redacting ACORN submissions Friday July 31 9am-10am 6487 — Preparing for meeting / h ” 1Oam-11:30am / ¢ hrs: 6487 — Team meeting about interrogatories with Edgardo on phone 11:30am — 12:30pm 6487 ~ Redacting ACORN submissions AW” 1:30-2pm; 3:30pm —4:00pm [he- 6487 — Redacting ACORN submissions Wednesday August 5 Sam — 1pm ¥ Ars: 6487 — Research for interrogatories Thursday August 6 x A rs- 6 hours: 6487 — Research for interrogatories Friday August 7 « 6 hours: 6487 — Research for interrogatories b ArsCanadian Radio-television and Be ecommucatone Commision PRC FIR FSIET CRTC Telecom N of C 2015-134 Review of basic telecommunications services FORM I - SUMMARY OF LEGAL FEES Asplcant: | PIACICRCINGORNINPFICO! Claimant: Employment status of claimant, as reported tothe Jaw society (es) of which the claimant is a member Ciaimants Tile: Articing Student [—] (creek one Lega Assistant BEX] Date when qualified as lew clerk or paralegat. § [7] Legal Counset FForogal counsal that are not in-house: ‘Completed years of practice: Year af Cal tothe Bar Has the lawyer practised continual since Callto he Bar? Yes No (ino, provide details and explanations on a seperate sheet) Rate Caines. (ATEOODa SERVICE [TIME CLAIMED FEE CLAIMED (use quarter-day increments for | |(days or hours x rate) inhouse servioas) |PREPARATION: Days or Hours Review Fle [eae ate.75 Research iz [3s0.00 [Summarize Submissions lEdting & Citations |Review and Revise Comments Prepare for hearing Draft Final Comments |Case management Request for Disclosure x= ra) |Comments i 2. 3. |ATTENDANCE: lattend hearing Jotner (spect) H Taxation Application other (speci) ht 2 s hrorautmeciamen: DAYS || Y 37 OTAL FEES: ana TES (GsT@] [Pst @ I HST@ [13%I) HST Allowable Claimed] [TOTAL CLAIM: [$656.25 | cory thatthe above information is true and accurate Date Sieteetcamee, (Seta SAT RTE 43 (2010-12) version francaise ansathe) CanadaJun 23,2016 09: Public Interest Advocacy Centre Client Summary Date of Report: Jun22,2016 Report by: Include Transactions: — May 01,2016 to Jun 22,2016 For Lawyer(s): Sort by; Alphabetic Client Range: Area of Law Range: Non-billable Time Exeluded Page: User: Working Lawyer Stefanija Savie 6487 to 6487 Il to 199 Chen Mat Ci Code N'B_Deseription 1 Name Maier Deseription Resp Work in Progress Fees Date Hours Disb. Disb, 87 CRTCTNOF C201 Ast CRTC 1 05/51/16 Summarizing final_—SS submissions based on preset, {steric n order to factitate PIAC in rating fa response, Reading trough all SS Snal submissions, an charting Summaries of the ‘documents based on various ise of imporance 010 vasnoine 1.00 1050.00 wnat Dating equsst for 88 500 dislosure of information op three complains sete to iteret Svvive rectved ty cach service prover 350.00 D607! Researching aed $8 40 280.00 ‘charting the average annual price increase ‘of intemet services in Canada, rom resent day tothe 1990. Resoweh fr final SS so reply (nosy confirming tations ‘and udditons| information footnotes} Assistin ding he 8 fina reply, and conclude soe Supporting research forthe fal ply (ost for referecing in foownots), tone 380.00 owtnite 200 140.00 ose Research orchan 8 300 dsaling ing Prices oF Item Services in Canada fom the 1950s unit presen dy. 21000 Tosat Cleat 2387.00 0.00 Grand Tora! 2.38700 0.0 oon 000 1.00 00 000HSE Sarecian Radio-television and ‘Telecommunications Commission PiRG Fie wae] CRTC Telecom N of C 2015-134 Review of basic telecommunications services FORM I - SUMMARY OF LEGAL FEES Aopen Cian Enpoymen satus of dalant 0 oor i the lewsodey (of wich ne domatt ws mamber Claimants Tie: Arising Stunt BE] (check one): Legal Assistant [Z] Date when qualified as a law clerk or paralegal; § (7 Legal Counsel [2] For opal counsel that are not haus: Completed years of practice ‘Year of Calo the Bar Has the lawyer practised continually since Cato fe Bar? Yes No { , provide detas ond explanations ona seperate sheet) Rate Claimed: [$7000 perhour [SERVICE TIME CLAIMED FEE CLAIMED (Use quarter-day increments for | |(¢ays or hours x rate) In-house services) |PREPARATION: Days or Hours Review File irs ne lResearch z 1,953.00 JDrating Rieer JOcaf interrogatories Responses JReview and Revise Comments Prepare for hearing lDraft Fine Comments |Request for Disclosure |Case management ez [euap0 | lComments 1 2 3. |ATTENDANCE: Jatend hearing [omer speci la. PROCEDURAL: [Costs Application Taxation Application Jotner (speci i B Is. [TOTAL TiMe CLAIMED: 38.7 [roTAL FEES: [STORED AS TARES, esta rsa ste 3%] [LHST Allowable Claimed)) [TOTAL CLAIM: [$2,708.00 cet thatthe ave informations tue and accurate. Data: Signature of claimant: KS bashon Canada CRTC 43E 2010-12) version rancaise capone CANSJul22, 2015 13:20:24 Page: 5 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Repor Jul22,2015 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 1980 to Jul22,2015 For Lawyer(s) Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 1 to 999999999999 1 to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded Clieat# Mat Client Name ‘Maiter Desripion Resp oe Work in Progress— Date NIB Description Hours Fees Disb, o1a6ns jew Rreviee KS 240 168.00 + Total Cleat: 2870 2,008.00, 000 000 0.00 0.00 6461 CRTCSHAWTARIFF omams seach Ks ovens reeweh ks Dowie reve KS Tet Cea (opiate enter orcansiae cere > ™ OWNS mating ks 10 400 canes reach xs oo sao owns reewile, XS 0 m0 owas esting Ks 10 12600 owas eeath s 000 2.00 unas meting Ks 10 7000 unis reach ks ow $600 sous meting Ks 200 14000 Osnbis eles 8 o20 1400 sass eating Ks 200 14000 saws rscach Ks 10 10500 sauis seach xs 130 13.00 sasis seach Ks 20 100 sams rescuch 8 250 17500 sags seach a 120 wo eos mscuch s a7 25900 6osis——rscach xs 490 33600 nsiis——rscach 8 sa ss20 ccnis seach Ks 130 133.00 ccs reeuch xs a0 300 cits teummeing XS 120 400 toutes aD B00 Cd 46 CRICTNOFCMIS46 CHTCTHcom aL coms 250 17500 commis ree 30 105.00 cares reseuch KS tao 12600 cons see KS anats—detigsie XS amis driingsder KS Gans review Breve KS 0.00 0.00 0.0Be “eration Ratio tstovsion and Telecommuniations Commission PCR EST RTC Telecom N of 6 2015-134 Review of base telecommunications services FORM | - SUMMARY OF LEGAL FEES ‘Applcant: [PLACIEACIACORNNPFICOSCQ Claimant Employment status of aimant, s eported to the Tow soney (ies) of wach te ceimantis a member Cisimants Tile: Artcing Student GT] (cheek one} Legal Assistant [Z] Date when qualified as law clerk paralegal: (7) Legal Counsel [=] ForTagal counsel that ate notn-house: ‘Completed years of practice: Year of Cal othe Bar. Hos the lawyer practised continual sings Calf The Bar? Yee No {tfr0, provide details and explanations ona separate sheet) Rote Claimed: [STOO perTOUE SERVICE [TIME CLAIMED FEE CLAIMED (Use quartocday increments for | |(doye or hours rate) in-house servess) PREPARATION Days or Hours Review Fle as [goa Research = frsaat —— i Drating Interogs interrogatories Responses as [5227.20 Review and Revise Comments —| fo = Prepare fer hestng i fzean00 Svategy Mestngs E 528.50 Request for Dscosuce 1 rar.00 = largument == cient Consutatons 5 r20 i 2 fs. [ATTENDANCE: tor nearing iz ao. Orter (speci: , 2 === S| ae JPRoceouRAL: [Costs Appcation & lao. Taxation Appication other (sect: h le S lrovaL nme cLAMED: 773.66 rAL FEES: SSaEES.EO Ad TES Cse__ STS seas [HST Atowabie Claimed) TOTAL CLA EERE {certy tht the above information is tue and accurate. Date: ‘Signature of caiman: Khoo Canada CRTC 434 (2010-12) version rancsise haponble adsJun 28, 2016 Page 1 Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to un28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Cynthia Khoo Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 ‘Area of Law Range: 1 tw 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded ‘Client Mat Client Name Mater Deseripion Resp Code Date __ NI Description Hours Feet Disb. G87 CRICTNOF 2015-184 CRTC OWOTAS Research ~ ck Compiling ‘ncumbent Ielcofeabieco marketing and Tovestor materials wo sow evidence of Promoting /preditin Canadian ‘Sonsmer growth ia Speed and data, 10 ‘hat "Canadians ‘hose to stay a 5/1 find dont need sions Dating quest for CK disclosure after researching MTSBell intros documents fom prior BSO proceeding and Somparing 1 REIS proceoding OsinOS aang otis CK. round ntrrogatones for cablecos (Shaw Videston, Cogeco osiiolts Drang of cK izerrogtories for besos MINS Drang oFcableeo CK. imesrogatories OWLS rating cK interrogatories to ask CMCRP (Dwayne Winseck, vandal Imtrrogatory ‘question, 0 OvIZNS Assisting with CK Xplomet tnterrgatories OWLS Furherassisting CK ‘ith imrrogatories OWIZNS Reviewing or? CK stating ntetozatones- Easting & 88: Group OWIIMS Reseach or AFS CK consultation ‘deument, owas cK Eastink & Si a0 350 oxo 160 i 203.00 van00 $6.00 zasoo 18900 168.00 S60 1120 48.00 11900Jun 28,2016 08:25:03 Public Interest Advocacy Centre Client Summary Jun 28, 2016 Jun 28, 2016 Alphabetic Date of Report: Include Transactions: Sort by: Report by: For Lawyer(s) Client Range: Jan 01, 2015 to ‘Area of Law Range: Non-billable Time Excluded Page: User: Working Lawyer Cynthia Khoo 6487 to 6487 1 to 199 ‘Glen Mat Client Name Code MatierDeseripion Resp Work in Propet rs Fees Disb te NA Deserition tied Hours Fees owls Review of ck 250 17S00 costed Smterrogatories eter Revise Eastink ® CK 120 0 SSI imterogatores, ‘erat into ‘sedated eter Incorporate French CK 040. xtetions into ‘nkerrogaories owns owt 24.00 OWYIS ——Updatcintermal CK so conslidated Imerrogaoies Foxmating cK 250 Imerrogatcies Create master isto CK 170 Round 1 Interropatoies ‘aressed to AAC Research $0-80 rule CK 170 & implementation i ru Interogatory CK 340 esponses- tacking ‘€ 5050 rule ‘esearch fr TELUS Update AAC cK 40 Sntrrogtories lisvqueston count Reseach $0.80 ule CK. 300 implementation BU Interrogmtery cK. ts0 responses (found 1) 35.00 omnis vrs owr7as 114.00 owns L900 owntws 238.00 owtg 2600 owes 21000 osions 108.00 OSS Assisting with CK 40 2800 Imrrogatory responses (Bll 4b Ess Research S0/80 rule CK. 070 ‘adoption in EU Research 0/80 re CK 190 adoption in EU France & UK, Research $80 le CK: 210 adoption in EU Draftingatoulating CK: on 70.00 response fo CNOC Questions {Unierogatories, Round 1) Researching 50/80 CK 020 14.00 rule (TELUS inemog to AAC OH) SW re going CK 360 rough member ovisits 4900 owions 13300 owisas 47.00 sao owas owzwiis 22.0Jun 28,2016 08: Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to 1un28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Cynthia Khoo Sort bys Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable ‘Client Mat Client Name Code ime Excluded Billed Hours Fees Dish, Date NI Description state NRAS DROWIS ——Proofiead CNOCQS CK 010 1.00 Inter response O&DVIS S08 research CK 00. 63.00 remaining countries U82VIS Consolidating S80 CK 2.00 70.00 research ORDVIS S00 ru ‘vzanizing dating response WIS —— Completing SRD CK 340 238.00 sale Fesearch owoars Research cK 200 4000 mertogatory responses W415 ASSES With CK: 130 st.00 intrrogatory responses (mecting research) Rescurchevidense CK. 200 14000 for “entertainment” Iterig responses cx Lo 770 ONS Draimterog CK 030 21.00 responses - nish NOC Q4 data eps) O85 Reseachevidense CK 60 12.00 for een intros response 082s Call WES.JL,GW CK 330 245.00 & Revearching tnt exposes OR261S Research for cK 520 36400 tetrrogatonies ES {questions, CNOC q7 ORRsiIS Research «x 320 224.00 interrogatories = CROC QS 168 factors) & further research for ES O8TIS Research cK 310 35700 imterrogmris for ES, Totter monitoring warns Dall iterrogaory Ch 230 161.00 response“ CNOC es x28is Drang cK 80 3500 imeerogatory ORRBIS ——Drafing cK. 0 98.00Jun 28,2016 08:25:03 Page: Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun28, 2016 Report hy: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Cynthia Khoo Sort by: Alphabetic (Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: 1 to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded Client# Mat Chent Name Matier Daripion Resp Code ea Date NIB Deseription Hours Fees Dish, URIWIS Review Rdisows CK 110 7700 merrozaony response reseweh w/ ES (eal) ww Finalizing da CK 030 21.00 Inkerroatory response (Rogers op owanis Researching ck 090 6.00 imerrogtoies for ry owas Researching cK 130 105.00 interoga responses for ES wwisias Research cK 590 63.00 imteropatory response fr JEL osisiris Research ForJF CK on 9.00 OSiSI/IS Help draft iterog. CK 010 700 response (Ropes ann) ORIN Hlp drat cK 080 56.00 Imetrogatory response Rogers 210) O)0I/IS Research compiling CK 570 399.00 daa eomplesing Sspreadshet) for S| Ooms Assist ES ck. 160 11200 liter responses OMNIS Set pintermgatory CK 190 13300 response documents oxmavtemplate) (MDS Help Format intntog CK: 070 49.00 responses ovens Call wes ck 0x0 $6.00 wort Research Qos CK. 090 35.00 standaads (consequences of faling to mest) O9H/1S QoS case reseaeh- CK: 130 1os100 (Commission action foc aie to meet, Standards BROWS Reseach -Qas& CK 1.80 126.00 SR eligibility O9IONS Research - Qos CK 240 168.00 ESR eligibility, ‘apt planning les Resemeh QoS) CK. 10 700 [ESI Etgibiity W9OUS ———Reseweh=QaS& CK 120 #00 [SR EligibilityJun 28, 2016 Page: 5 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015, to Jun 28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Cynthia Khoo Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded Glen # Mat Client Name Mater Description Resp oot Workin Progress—— Billed —————— Date__N/B_Description Hours Fees Disb, Hours Fees Disb, TWINS Research ck 00 35.0 sio8ns Rescarch cK 070 48.00 OsiOWIS Reseach, meeting CK 370 259.00 wil 09/081 Interop response CK. 430 301.00 research Owowts ——Imerog response CK: 290 203.00 ressarch 0300715 tnerogresonse CK 170 9.00 ressarch owosnts Tallyinternogs CK 030 21.00 AAC ake other pees OBIS Ierog response CK oan 2400 research (PABILS Assit ES wi cK 170 119.00 Ineo responses OWIVIS Drang inermog 10 11900 responses (NWS Research & drafing CK 250 17500 inteog espones. owns Troubleshoot Ch 090 3.00 inteog response Cal with ES OHiI4i1S———Organizeteview CK 090 «3.00 Imerow responses! next steps (fom and ToAAC) Wwnais Organize AAC CK 02s nso Interop NTDS wwnans Address TDS CK 035 nso owisis Researchtint CK 078 5250 introg response NIDe owrisns Rescate CK 30 210.00 interog response NIDs ooeis Exact AAC ck 0 42.00 sutsidy & Fonding Proposal points fom figinal submission IW6/S ——ASCLemailinteog CK om 23.10 response idea} ONOIS ——Resolveimerog CK. 0.90 63.00 Nis omiteis ——canwies cK 050 38.00 DoS Clee dni for ES CK 070 8.00 ier response WATS PrepmeAAC CK 030 56.00 Inteog tacking Aocament (ther partes responsesJun 28,2016 08:25:03 Page: 6 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28, 2016 Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to Jun 28,2016 Cynthia Khoo Sort by: Alphabetic 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded ‘Client Mat Client Name Matter Deseripion Resp ‘Ont Workin Progress i Date __NIB_ Description Howes Fees Disb, Hours Fees Disb 1 AAC questions) OBITS Phan format ck 060 #200 ‘documents for AAC Interogatny binds wan Bit mterogstony CK 050 3500 responses wwwis Edit inerrogatry CK 220 13400 tows Research rE CK, 020 400 HONS Ineroaresponses= CK 000 42.00 ressrch, NID tng, formating Do" Inertog responses» CK 310 277.00 rscch NIDs ceding. formatting owavis Editing iterog CK 310 217.00 responses AVIS Organi incoming CK 020 on Imerog sponses owauis Biting itetrog CK 130 105.00 responses onus Update itaions CK 030 2100 (Rogers inteoe resonss) 9215 Dashing ever iener CK: ons 5250 for itr responses O22 Organine imcoming CK 20 1400 Iirrogatery responses 92S Organie incoming CK 200 4000 imitrogtoey responses a exeale Round! Intrrogateies binder (AAC responses) 09225 Organize /eeview CK 120 Hoo Incoming intro responses (1 92s Review cK 200 0.00 fntergaory responses (8 1 DVIS Review incoming CK. 033 2310 ‘nisrogatory responses For Aeticencies| WRMIS — Review incoming CK. S10 357.00 interogatary respomse for Aeisencee wwnais Reviewincomme CK. bso 105.00 imtertogatory epson FoJun 28, 2016 08:25:03 Page: 7 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Cymhia Khoo Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 ‘Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded Client Mat Client Name Mater Description Resp Coe Work in Progress——— Date _N/B_Deseription ees Dish, Hours Fees Disb. efclncies DvMIS Review incoming CK 130 108.00 tnterrogtory respanses fo eicensies| 9H Reviewing incoming CK 600 20.00 interogatory responses for Seliincies ewnsis Review incoming CK on 20 Intemogatory responses for etclencis O9A815 Review incoming CK 300 210.00 Ierrozatory responses for Uetcensis Preview” in thi ul previous eis ~ Surmatzs ok Tor fiber arguments, ac} cones BSOinierogs& CK 20 149 00 uitenens ‘ations, admin ovraes Imerog oK 050 35.00 esponseldefiiencie SreseareWaderin oopons Research Xplomets CK 2m 189.00 came ast wih ‘mero deficiencies 3018 Servedeficiensy CK 025 1730 elas fer DIS Dra Bell eficizoy CK 7s 5250 ‘onfiamation| LovoVts Research teri CK 030 350 cos application Hoyts Researches CK 030 21.00 wits Research ‘ons appieation cK 190 133.00 Hoots Discussing cK 130 vos.00 slordaity figument JL Hots Researeh-ineris CK os 3800 sts apliation| FOOLS ——_Affodabitty cK 1p 98.00 gumen notes WWOSS Draft inerim cess CK 10 105.00 pplication rows Dra iterim cass CK Lo 10s 00 pplieavon row9s Finish deting CK 300 210.00Jun 28,2016 08: Page: Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: Client Summary Date of Repor Jun28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Cynthia Khoo Sort by: Alphabetic (Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded Cicat# Mat Code ent Name ate NIB Deserption Dib. tours Fess ‘application omens File incoming CK 020 1400 responses to request for fortes response and dsclosure WI3/1S Organize incoming CK 1.00 ‘TH00 files & trackconsoidate responses to AAC decency eins ais Meating WIL CK oso 3800 10318 ———Finalizing/sending CK as 1780 RG interosatry response summaries WWISMS ———-Restrctte shared CK 0665 4620 folder organization WO/'s ——Prepreviewfor CK 250 17500 Xplomst meeting ~ smsstng with Xplomet counsel isnt GW) HOGS Reviewing Xplornet_ CK osu 35.00 Loleils——Assessreseaeh CK ox soon scope VOUS —— Research Xplomet CK 050 35.00 WAWIS ‘esearch Resolwe CK 240 168.00 IDs (find rank TSP TORS) tor0lls ——Sumeuize- cK 130 1.00 Intemog responses Wwevis Summarize = cK o2s i130 imerog responses Woeois Summarize cK 120 B00 incumbent inter responses lores Summarize cK 150 105.00 ‘event nero responses ozeis summarise cK. 070 48.00 ‘cumbont intro responses Jones Research-Ru2— CK 030 2100 Imerros roowiis Resesich-Ri2 CK 130 103.00 Imeroes looms Reseurch-Shaw CK 20 1400 Inteogstory HRMS ——Sumnariee CMR CK 200 140.00 (an fangs apply S080 rule RMS Admin review CK 33 23.10 aS Summarize cx 180 2600Jun 28,2016 08: Page: 9) Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Cynthia Khoo Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded ‘Ghent Mat Client Name Maver Deseripion Resp ae Wor i Pre a= Date__NIB_Deseription Hours Fees Disb Hours Fees Disb, oer responses rows Summarize iteog CK 080 36.00 responses WORKS — Summarize inenog CK 100 7100 responses inpss Summarize interop CK 200 000 responses lnrss——SunmarieCMR CK 050 3800 Findings ores Summarize MR CK 140 98.00 findings ones Summarize CMR CK a0 98.00 findines 1025/18 Summarize inertog CK tan 98.00 responses 102918 CompileRownd2—CK 060 2.00 Incertogatoy Seer appendices 1n29/1S Summarize introg CK. 1.00 70.00 responses 1029s Summarize imertog CK 70 19.00 responses Won01s ——Draftyound?. CK 190 133.00 foterrogatores Woo0s Review fda CK 160 112.00 Foterrgtories enti rhs WBW1S Summarize MR CK 3.0 21000 Telecoms Sector Wes Research ck 050 3500 (intenogatres) Lis Som incoming CK 030 2100 inkeogatories (round2) Hiss Imertogatories CK 020 14.00 Hoss Inieogaories- CK so 105.00 Sater seating ea hiaois Rescarch-cost CK 3.00 210.00 reve, HVS Dra itera cK 00 70.00 responses LTS Drathimerrog CK 130 91.00 Hiss Researeh cK. 7s 5250 lusts Research ns so 105.00 vawis Research cK 020 4.00 wwasis ait inctoy x 2s 1730 response hiasiis Research cK 160 11200Jun 28, 2016 Page: 10 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyeri(s) Cynthia Khoo Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 ‘Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Excluded ‘Cent Mat Client Name Maer Description Resp Code Date __ NM Description Hours Pees iso, Hours Fees Dish. wees Revewgive cK 100 >on Feeback on response hens Imteros ck. 10 7000 Nam Reviewormat CK 10 8.00 interrogatories bovis Profieaditerops CK 050 35.00 bows Prooieadinerrogs CK. 220 13400 12021S ——_ileadminGinerog._ CK o2s i780 responses) Lamyts Organize intenos CK 020 Moo nmr Set uprespome CK 0x0 36.0 ‘racking & sumary coments Lan7s———Summanze intero CK 166 4620 responses Ions Swminarae rd? CK 080 35.00 Imerrog responses LOWS Update federal CK O10 70 funding document |2m8/15 Review feommient CK 060 42.00 ‘an deficiency drat iovianis Reviseproo! ck 09 00 sefcieney lai 120015 Satay meeting CK oss 39.50 Ianans Client omepager CK 060 42.00 12S Clintconsulttion CK 1.00 10.00 (ACORN) 1285 Meeting wi cK 120 ‘54.00 stakcholder OUNIS Reseach = cK 110 1700 Interpreting sieves ata OLAV Analysing cK 200 140.00 Alfordabily survey Reseach ake CK 060 42.00 Phase? survey 12016 Update Connecting CK. 10 700 (Canaan tab ovpo46 Reseach dating CK: 240 168 00 O1RVI6 Reset dating CK. 030 21.00 DUQVI6 Reseach / dating CK 20) 140.00 Ov Reseach deaing CK 210 147.00 OUAUIG eating cK. 1.00 70.00 1226 Resear cK 050 35.0 OUG — Research /drating CK 0.60 42.00 026/16 Research & dating CK 780 525.00 O12BIG Research & draing CK 066 4620Jun 28, 2016 08:25:03 Page: Publie tnterest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: un 28, 2016 Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to un28, 2016 Cynthia Khoo Sort by: Alphuabetic 6487 to 6487 ‘Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded Client # Mat Cent Name Matter Description Resp big Work in Pres Date NIB Description Hours Fees Disb, Hours Fees Dish. OIARIG Research & dating CK 500 $00.00 12916 Research & dating CK 1.00 70.00 50-80 re D196 Research & dating CK 600 20.00 129/16 Research & drafting CK 150 10800 O2I01416 Research & Drating “CK 100 70.00 e216 Drafting cK 100 1000 o2i016 Forming ck 1.00 70.00 020216 “Filesabmissons CK. 1.00 ‘ro.00 0202/16 Putiogetherheaing CK 180 12600 baler e216 Strmegy mesting CK. 1.00 7000 0203716 Review « 100 000 OUOKNG——Prep hearing «x 30 105.00 raters oni Sanuaies cK 200 140.00 208/16 Summarize futher CK 130 3100 interventions ORIN ——Summarie father CK 99 13300 2/0816 Summarie ther CK 00 70.00 O2I09118 Summaries father CK 1.00 70.00 020016 Discus wD CK. 050 35.00 02/10/16 Summarize funder CK: 20 40.00 02126 Mew TD cK 1.00 70.00 C2616 Summarize furor CK, 090 63.00 G2i16iN6 Summarize farber CK: 3.00 210.00 tnerventions| e296 Summarize x 200 140.00 0226 Summarize fanier CK, 1200 10.00 02226 Summarize faner CK 600 42000 (2236 Summarize uber CK 400 20.00 ODI Organi inline CK 30 195.00 susmary ear ©2296 PrepBSOhearing CK o2s 1750 binder (22516 PePASOhewng CK 00 0.00 binderJun 28, 2016 Page: 12 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan O1, 2015 to Jun 28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Cynthia Khoo Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 Area of Law Range: to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded (Chent® Mat_Client Name Matter Description Resp oo Work it Progress———— led Date _N/B_ Description Hours Fees Disb, Hours Fees Disb. 03/0416 Strategy meeting W) C% 230 175.00 ES e316 ‘Summarize speed CK 530 85.00 target RFs @ add to chat osnais ‘Summarize speed CK 110 7.00 target RFls & add wo chart 329116 Reseach fact- CK 410 287.00 ccking ogi Reading / cK 800 $60.00 reviewing preparing fr hearing onus Research forbearing CK 800 560,00 ‘ep evse OF remarks owns Research, review CK 800 560.00 EKOS survey, reac factsheets Fr hearing owners Hearing prep, CK 800 $60.0 attendance, aking ots, rescach ounris Hearing prep, CK 800 56000 ‘avendance, faking notes, esearch ownsito Hearing prep, CK 1090 70000 astendance, aking tes, esearch review, document preparation owt Hearing rep cK 10.00 700.00 ‘attendance, taking. notes. research ovat ering pep, ck 10.00 700.00 atendance, taking tes, research, osnsrte Hearing pep, ck 100 ‘70000, tendance, aking tes, research, owiane Hearing ep, ck 00 36000) ‘atlendance,| ‘appearance assis ‘Attended hearing CK 400 280.00 ouisne Heasing attendance. CK 400 20.00 rotting owone Hearing attendance. CK 300 24000 note-taking pains Hearing attendance, Cie B00 56000 roe-takingPage: 13 Jun 28, 2016 Public Interest Advocacy Centre Users 7 Client Summary Date of Report Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01, 2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Cynthia Khoo Sort by: Alphabetic Client Range: 6487 to 6487 ‘Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded ‘Ghent Mat Client Name Cote Date NIB Description ours ees Disb. 426/16 ——Dackgroundreading CK 5.00 "35000 arceeach ‘Gatsietiona questions) 042716 Mearing atendanes, CK 4.00 280.00 otetaking O42WI6 Hearing attendance, CK so 380.00 staking 042916 SO Post Hearing CK 20 49.00 Strategy Meeting» NoteiPrep Os02/16 Dt esponsea CK Ls0 105.00 jurisdiction qussion sons Reseach far cK 400 280,00 jwnisdcion questions S76 Pinal submission CK 300 210.00 sesearchlrenew Total Cte 993.465 34.585.50, 00 000 100 0.00 ot 493.68 3455.50 600 a0 1.00 0.00BoB] S2redtan Recotetevison ana TTelecommunicatons Commission PIC Fie weaa7 ——] CRTC Telecom N of C 2015-134 Reviow of basic telocommunications services FORM Ill ~ SUMMARY OF CONSULTANT AND ANALYST FEES Applicant: [BIACICAGIACORNINPFICOSTQ Claimant’ onatian Bishop Claimants Tite: Consutant [EE] (check one pays BE ote which the daimant fst began ofsring sevice asa coneiant a ana] Aug.t2 a Competed numberof years acting as @ Consultant or Analyst os. (edict appropriate period of tine f caimart was not acting continually es the Claimant an in-house employee of the Apallaant Yes No (fro, provide details and explanations on a soparate shoet) Rote Claimed: [ATO dally rate \ SERVICE [TIME CLAIMED [FEE CLAIMED |(Use quarter-day increments for | |(days or hours x rate) in-house services PREPARATION: ‘Days or Hours Review Fite lReseerch [za [7057.50 [Drafting of Document [L3z7-| fazz.s0 lDraft interrogatories Responses IReview and Revise Comments Fe |Prepare for hearing Ze (352.50, |Draft Final Comments |Request for Disclosure |Conferences with staff and client ———| 70,007 |Comments t l2 3. |ATTENDANCE: Jattend hearing Otercpect: Orne epeciy: 2 ls [TOTAL TIME CLAIMED: Dayell 5 fOTAL FEES: [$2,702.50 ‘Add TAXES: esta. ste [ste [eI [HST Allowable Claimed] [TOTAL CLAIM [s2,702.50 {erty thatthe above information is rue and accurate. Date: CDi IE za/e | Slanature of claimant CRTC 434 (2010-12) version Fanceisedaponbie anadaJun 28,2016 08:29:37 Public Interest Advocuey Centre Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to Jun28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Sort by: Alphabetic (Client Range: ‘Area of Law Range: Non-hillable Time Excluded Page: I User: 7 Working Lawyer Jonathan Bishop 6487 to 6487 1 to 199 ‘Client? Mat Client Name Maier Deserip Rep Code Date __N/_Deseription Hours Fees Disb Hours Fees Disb. 687 CRTCTNOF C2015-134 CRTC a HRI Reseach review 1 200 130.00 OIFIC dessin From Feb 2018 FCC 110 Dsmas—— Confers with 1B, 230 18750 sat Osm8/IS Drang oF 6 050 3750 documents WSIS Research foF 03 and JB 300 225.00 3A of eonsutaton OSS —— Research fe Q3R I 200 130.00 [3A of consultation OSS Dring of 38 100 75.00 documents OSIVIS Conference wate I 2.30 i280 ‘vith JFLAILIALIGW and hats osjions Research 8 130 1280 52515 Conference with JB 130 11280 client (ACORN) and SL =alordablity osonis Research a8 130 11230 aspors Research 1B 0.60 45.00 qos Reseach 1B 30 225.00 oiiaris Drating of 18 30 225.00 documents 00103415 ing oF 4B 400 300.00 docuinents Wt01S Conference with AB 060 5.00 GWIFUALKS1. sd otside expert OvNONS Research = m 100 7500 Conference Hoard report = notes sent cw HOOUIS Telephone ell mm Jb nso 3750 Envronice = nvonce pisment 02/03/16 Correspondence a so 7500 with IDUALGWICK OVNI rating of 18 1.00 75.00 Aocumens reply 6 Incoming raiettr fom SK resident Toe used sa template going Teeward ou)26 raking or 1B 22s 168.75 oeumens = social media prep,Jun 28, 2016 Page: 2 Public Interest Advocacy Centre User: 7 Client Summary Date of Report: Jun 28,2016 Report by: Working Lawyer Include Transactions: Jan 01,2015 to 1un28,2016 For Lawyer(s): Jonathan Bishop Sort by Alphabetic (Client Range: 6487 to 6487 ‘Area of Law Range: | to 199 Non-billable Time Exeluded Client # Mat Client Name Code Date __N_Deseription Disb. Hours Fees Dis TWAS Reseach prepanng JB 6 450.00 apestions and paricpating ock hearing Tosal iene 07s soseas von noo 00 000 Grand Tout 098 3,056.25, m 000 0.00 00Form Ik: Summary of Expert Witness Fees Page 1 of 2 acm I: Surimary f Exger wines Fes WOR SEMA ein Seatenerncnsones Canada ‘Belt Regt) Re RN se ae sd rrcheen Hol Sagaiatoetnnn, gest comeneamcesion Preceding No; THC 2015-134 FORM II - SUMMARY OF EXPERT WITNESS FEES. pen: PACICACACORNNPFC:O came don Sop Ey Tae CE Fee cAI oeetaeey [paerRaTToR Tambor aT ars | Hoare 6238 Fei or Sane oo ae eT a Hao0 = a eae Fraser tarrionoeanaa a [Farmers na faa aa Presa aa am coo maa tame Fan eveonma ie camaro a woe ooo 00 i aT a tate Larrenbancts Taber of daa aye $1650 / any barron oo ir ‘em BOAT aie ave: © FREE Tams hamxescste ure ara? 238 [aes TAX REBATE pe wae ost recanage niet: Grsrownan se et pwerneg ee 208 jeracecan r : neon | corti that he above formation is rue wri accra Ochiee= 14, 2015 Sena ot Cant tein ror Intps://services.erte.ge.ca/formuleires-forms/Eng/Porms%20and%20Access%20Key/telec.... 10/19/2015From: Edgardo Sepulveda [mailtores@esepulveda.com) ‘Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 3:46 PM To: “John Lawford! Ce: ‘Geoffrey White’; ‘Donna Brady’ ‘Subject: RE: Edgardo hours status and other matters Hello John: ‘The attached includes an allocation of hours to the CRTC categories, as follows: Review file: 15.7 Prepare application Prepare interrogatories: 20.4 Respond to interrogatories: 143.8 Prepare interventions/comments Prepare evidence Legal research Prepare for hearing Prepare expert report: 233.2 Prepare reply comments Consult with client: 40.4 Case management Other (specify): TOTAL: 453.5, Best, Edgardo‘epulveda hours and allocation to CRTC format (tober 16,2035) REVISED ate escipton ert Revo ot nd vou Pe. Cult PAC dias pr apres or expr sen. Speech an pate on fo PA estate fa eT. “bape Fepr/ewte as memo for PAC 1 sve er enpr epor nde 0 PC. ‘Eiey 35 bused on aceson nea Meo of 930 Sat ft esac of USF ara ed UA, BEES Begerceceseces ESSeSsessesses ESREESEREEEEEE ‘un Prone Td enon of Peer‘oo. roar Tr Veron af ape so 20 00 00 89 00 20 235 Pape responses tonto Seed compet at AC fr se “ceeipatr ain gine Heo Becescecece eeeereemmary of Expert Witness Fees Page | of 2 ‘anvacl Mam >For and My CATE Account > Telcomumankains > Pte Surin ot xeet Wine Fo Bretton Proreeaag No NE 205:194 FORM II - SUMMARY OF EXPERT WITNESS FEES. Aelia PROACHEORMAHCOEO Cams Facet Senses SERVICE TRE SIATED FRE CLATD [raspawarioNs Wariber ot howrat | ours 3235 / rsa i 5690 ool T — tom a f= [reaandoreecgnem a Fever aoe 2 oo cane ao a Taiaw ~ we. 1 sazrew Fnoreren cone x07] [sorta clo — a7 Ene [Berane ET aw larvawbance, Tamer oa 2 Days x $1650 / any [rarer ee co a Sesoe jrOvaC mE CCA S Tours: [rors ree : a McTAXES (STG — wPST@ — wnETe 25 a - $60 79078 [nas TAK REBATE Upc T (GST (etcerspetnante ih Sst then vo Eo cera owe moreno vue acest Aenea yaaa aire ~ hups//serviees.crt.ge.ca/formulaizes-forms/Eng/Farms%20and420AccessP420Key‘eleco.,. 6/10/2016From: Edgardo Sepulveda [mai Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 3:16 PM To: ‘Donna Brady’; "John Lawford’ Subject: RE: Expert Witness Billing Hello Donna: Find below the second tranche of the hours submission, AAs per our discussions back in October, first tranche totaled 452.5 hours and covered the period from April 27 to October 9. ‘The second tranche covers the period from October 10 to today June 9 for a total of 294.5. ‘The attached includes an allocation of hours to the CRTC categories, for the first and second tranche and for total. The second tranche is as follo Review file: Prepare application Prepare interrogatories: Respond to interrogatories: 80.3 Prepare interventions/comments Prepare evidence Legal research Prepare for hearing: 48.5 Prepare expert report: 99.0 Prepare reply comments Consult with client: 25.7 Case management Other (Expert input into final comment: 41.0 TOTAL: 2 {In addition to all the above, please also put me down for 0.5 days for testifying (April 14), Best, EdgardoFrom: Edgardo Sepulveda [mailto:es@esepulveda.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 2:09 AM To: ‘Donna Brady’; “John Lawford’ Subject: RE: Expert Witness Billing Donna: Find attached the receipts for my travel expenses: Flights: $470.36 Hotel: $621.06 Airport Taxis: $125.00 Local Taxi (from Hearing to Hotel): $15.00 Total: $1,231.42 Thanks, EdgardoSepulveda hours and allocation to RTC format (October 36,2015) -REVISED thar cy rer gen nl comnts regret Pape ieteventons cones rope aon agate 5B comitwith et EEE £ responttoinecgnrer ‘Une 6 ese ese ped Nepean vied att,0 3 0000 09 05 oaeea0 go 40 00 0000 00 a5 io 8000 02 Go coooes 9 eg| 0 0900 00 5a i 2000 oo O2 ooeoes a6 50 30 » 000 09 60 coooes of so 0 ore 200 00 oa coopea 99 54 oo te acco 08 a9 soodea 00 60 a 10 (aoa 02 a9 op000a se 00! x ta 0000 02 oo opooea 32 08 20 oss So05 03 00 apace if on u 0s oao0 03 ao aoo0eo 9 on 8 to tooo 03 be opepe 32 00 as FP ooo 03 a9 op09e0 39 on & to 000 03 00 Sp oee 40 on Pa ia 0000 00 00 spone 39 an a to 5000 00 oo opoeee 49 ag 20 2 S200 03 an obese 22 on a 10 200 98 69 spo8e0 30 og 20 ry $000 03 a2 opopen 28 a6 so to 000 a9 a2 aposea so og “ 10 000 00 a9 op0dos a0 08 20 1 0000 00 G2 aoonea 99 06 ry 1 0000 00 ao oo0p0a Op 08 60 30 000 00 00 soonea 98 09 to 12 0900 00 09 co0oea 49 00 Fl 40 0900 00 09 caavoD od 00 ta 40 0900 00 9 e0.0009 60 00 10 10 90.00 09 on opooao oo og wo 0 Seea 09 bo so0aa0 a9 00 iE(Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission Proceeding: CRTC Telecom N of C 2015-134 Review of Basic Telecommunications Services FORM IV- AFFIDAVIT OF DISBURSEMENTS IN THE MATTER OF THE ASSESSMENT OF COSTS OF Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) {Donna Brady, ofthe City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario make an oath and say [or affirm]; am Office Administrator ofthe Pubic Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) (the “applicant, and as such have knowledge ofthe matters to which I hereinafter depose. 2. Auached to my affidavit as Exhibits are 25 sheets setting out the disbursement claims of FAC Jad the required evidence of disbursement [receipts and other supporting documentation as equied under 41 ofthe Commission's Guidelines forthe Assessment of Costs, revised of 23 December 2010, the Guidelines], and which (hashave] been prepared in accordance with those Guidelines. 3. Tote best of my knowledge ad belie the disbursement claims of [PIAG submited herewith, and all the docurestaion in support, represent disbursements incurred necessarily and reasonably forthe purpose of the proceeding 4. [Where applicable} The disbursement claims submited herewith are made in accordance withthe ‘Commission's determination set out in Cost Order Number [J and do not exceed the costs permitted therein, 5. [Where applicable] The applicant has submited claims for meals in aecordance wth sections 34 and 38 of the Guidelines. To the best of my knowledge and belie, these claims represent disbursements incured for the purpose ofthis proceeding and donot lead to double recovery. 6. [Where applicable} The applicant [has or will] receive() the following financial assistance in connection with its participation in the proceeding: [TN of C201S-134—___] [Where applicable The applicant is emited to a rebate in connection withthe Federal Goods and Services Tax or any other applicable tak. Please specify rebate: (ost (Percentage rebate: 6) [Dest (Percenage rebate:| Ps) IST (Percentage rebate:| Fé) The applicant's GST registration number is [73059 2405 RT 0001]. SWORN [OR AFFIRMED] BEFORE ME at the [Cty, Town, ete} of Ottawa, in the [country, Regional Municipality, of Ottawa-Carleton NeMroMNEI ONE Fe ZO” SIE Lsbff Wt =e DMAeSTONGR frkaing Taare Signature of Aan oreemeyal He Lil, LsccllS057A)EXHIBIT A~ SUNIWARY OF DISBURSEMENTS “Teper Ts the Appeant | —1 Ves, acta whch rebate apaiabio lige fora tx Publi Intarest Advocacy Conte (PIAC) rebate? T (Percentage eat) Ee PST (Percenige etal) Ne 1ST (Percentage rebete—)) ‘TYPE OF DISBURSEMENTS PATE ToraL costs RECEPT ( Spectegin Unetuaing (mere appiiabie, Appendix ot ostiestmsry Indleste page ‘uicelines) Teferenee) ‘OFFICE EXPENSES: Toute process SiS ep aa rs ‘Gar peace, ping and = ‘ming PosageCouiar Tog Dace Telaphonean) 3505 arg [Fase ‘AiR TRAVEL (Ut each vai separate) THe one a0 tH Tay Conear = Bas oF TERR RE os INTERCITY TRAIN OR BUS TRAVEL: — (Ut each raelersaparatayy z 5 a INTRA: CiF¥ CAR TRAVEL? Tater rar SENT 7 ‘S035 z ‘sm 3 Sha 2 ‘$0.38 & 35h PARI ToT Da [TRAC ciTY TARTBUSTTRAN: 20 ay HOTEL ACCOMODATION Titan rar era) Reto he cory FA Tay Dara Ba Fz Eee oo PRIVATE ACCOWODATIONS Tasch avai sepa 7 Sia 2 S20 z SZaley 2 sz 5 S20OTHER DISBURSEMENTS; Speci naure oF bummer [1 Sirvey Envzorice ara oT 2 Suvey— Sataies Canada wer co 7% 5 ‘SUBTOTAL DISBURSEMENTS: 0008 (®XCLUOING MEALS) TESS REBATE F APPUCABLE «sreciry(—_] ano) | SUBTOTAL DISBURSEMENTS LESS REBATE: 208 (EXCLUDING MEALS) MEALS: Timber | Nomber ot | Nantero? | NunbaraP TAL WERCCLANE (indent each individual) | ofdaye | Breaktste | Lunches | inners e Gon | 2 ($26 lomances) | § 14400 Stsiday | Sowanee) | slowance) Tame oF dN ier Joan 7 7 7 7 7500 dy Dane 7 7 T 7 weo0 ‘TEguarde Sepavess 7 7 t 7 fino : =. ‘SUBTOTAL MEALS GLAMED: = 444.00 “SaBioal oF alabureements 725.00 {exeing esis) ‘SubieaT oF maT Ca aie [TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ETAll _ Tune 2%- (6 JI ecoust) KE. (URE fue # “eT Spelocep ih, . fiers flote 4s £ = eonys LATE fuwEde (he 4/9 fegstee Cyaes Ow fire ftAcwnt fa Se eee = GD ee Tila are: fe BaAoyO ROGERS’ a ae Page 11 of 13 Bi Usting by employee 6487 Vole: 1 416-461-5322 Toronto, ON 13 May 10:02 am 21:06 1.58 2 416-536-1882 Toronto, ON 27 Apr 3:32pm 84:54 4.87 3 416-536-1882 Toronto, ON 12 May 4:16 pm 30 4 4 416-590-0729 Toronto, ON 11 May 10:11am 9:00 “68 & 416-B48-7758 Toronto, ON 27 Apt 3:30 om. 30. 4 Total for 6487 $7.24 & Seldinane& Oo ROGERS” A7June 2015 Page 11 of 12 fi Usting by employee 6487 Voice 1 Total for 6487 Number cated 416-536-1882 ana called Toronto, ON Tme___stiua 21 May 3:01pm 80:18© ROGERS’ Account 17403195 July 2016 Page 6 of 10 4 3 Usting by employes 6487 Voice. Number calla Placa called ate Min ast 1 204-985-8533 Winnipeg, MB Buul 1:30pm 1:30 wn 2 416-461-5322 Toronto, ON 10 Jul 3:64pm — 30:30 2.29 3a 416-538-1882 Toronto, ON 24 Jun 1:03pm 74:54 5.62 4 416-536-1882 Toronto, ON 26 Jun 1:48pm 16:38 1.25 5 416-536-1882 Toronto, ON 2 dul 11:01 am 36 05 8 416-536-1882 Toronto, ON Tdul 4:35pm 6:36 42 7 416-596-1882 Toronto, ON 13 Jul 1:10 pm 30 04 a 119-821-8883 _Gusloh, ON Bul 1:05pm 2:36 20 Total for 6487 $9.98& aan © ROGERS’ Page 8 of 10 sting by emoloyee ~ 6487 Voice Number called Place called Date _Time ___Minut ce i 416-636-1882 Toronto, ON Atul 10:02 am 76:30 4. Total for 6487 $5.74O ROGERS’ : Page 8 of 11 2%) a Usting by employes 6487 Voice Number called Place called Date___Tima ius Cast 1 416-536-1882 Toronto, ON W9Aug 4:32pm 20:12 1.52 $7.51 & ‘oak cine.| HII & w0861 O ROGERS’ Page 7 of 7 Listing by employes 6487 416-536-1882 Toronto, ON Total for 6487 11 Jan 30. 5.06O ROGERS" Page 8 of 13, Listing by employes 6487 Voice mbar called. lace called Dats Minutes i 416-544-3028 Toronto, ON VOct 4:09pm 1:18 10 416-544-9028 Toronto, ON 1Oct 4:26 pm 1 4 ‘Total for 6487 $.27 Rw 108561Pago 5 of 7 oO ROGERS" ie 6 8 sting by employee: 6487 1 416-278-3737 Toronto, ON 6 Apr 2:12 pm :30 04 Total for 648; $5.21IT & waa O ROGERS’ Page 9 of 14 sting by employee = 6487 Voice su led Biace called DateTime minut 1 416-535-1882 Toronto, ON 16 Nov 2:58 pm 12:30 24 Total for 6487 $.94& © ROGERS’ Page 6 of 13 isting by employes - 6487 Voice umber called lace called Mit ! 1 416-440-8140 Toronto, ON 20 Apr 2:30pm 20:54 1.87 2 416-833-4864 Toronto, ON 22 Apr 2:35pm 31:42 2.38 3 416-996-6401 Toronto, ON 19 Apr 5:03pm 8:24 63 4 416-996-6401 Toronto, ON 22 Apr 3:15pm 1:30 " ‘Total for 6487 $4.74Herb John [herb john@npfmail.ca) 6 Saturday, April 16, 2016 12:00 PM ‘bh Donna Brady Mary Forbes 5 Subject: Expenses for AAC i’ f ALG Hoo jh am guessing that you are the person | should send this to. Please find attached the fight expenses for the AAC Hearing. Please send the reimbursement to: National Pensioners Federation Att’ Mary Forbes Treasurer 21186 Stanfield Road Mississauga On L4Y 1R5 Phone: (905) 306-1830 Email: Mary.Forbes@npfmail.ca Thanks, Herb, *s##* PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS E-MAIL **#*°* [=] Itinerary/Receipt Your booking is confirmed. Please prinv/etain this page for your financial records (e.g. for taxation, expense claim or payment card reconciliation purposes). We thank you for choosing Air Canada and look forward to welcoming you on ons Séauiistaide ashe inat ay aiLCsmaaciesn in Access your personalized Pema enti pensinNer PE Window Air Canada travel information Booking InformationThank you for flying Porter Booking status: Confirmed Porter contirmation number: F7FGEW within 24 hows of departure Porter only aceepts debit or eredit payments at check-in andthe gate. We are now cash five Ni enee td WINDSOR, CA (¥QG) TO OTTAWA, CA (YOW) PD 574 [[q 49:30 AM 10:25 AM indsr, CA (YG) Toronto, CA(TZ) CONNECT: TORONTO, CA 077) CONNECTING Tite: 30 NieTES PD 255 | (5) 10:55 AM Toronto, CA (VIZ) 1:51 AM Duawa, CA (YOW) esos Herbert John ViPorter Member 8010005983 Ernesto Checked baggage policy r ne Weight fee per bag ee were above 23kg ay in Pay in aivince | Payataieport| UMN" | Paya airport Windsor Otawe s2750-31.02] $3750-Sis.13]| $3750-843.13| 51750-85463] $7750-$89.3 1 you have prepaid for yo checked baggage and are traveling with a partner airline, please be prepared to present your itinerary atthe alin eck-in counter Soe fil heb gangs ussCarry-on baggage policy TWO items of eary-on bageage are permite, ree of charge, per passenger 2s will be checked a the gate fora fee of $47.50 ~$129-38, taxes included. (Oversized catry-on bs Windsor - Ottawa (paid) 21 | checked bags Windsor - Ottawa ‘Bags not added dda pag Save S10 plus tax per bag when you pay on Seat selection Windsor = Toronto 1 reserved seat Gos Toeonto - Ouawa Seats not assigned pera seats [iy ere Car Rent Seeds anon Air ransportation charges $134.00 Taxes, fees and charges $88.75 Total Fare Price sm278 nese Same day airport change per passenger” | Advance change per passenger Windsor -Ottawa tian o siso 875 per direction +/- fare difference + Subject avai Secale, ts al condons PyNcom nae Identification requirements Al passen identification, s travelling within Canada are required to present one piece of valid government issued photo Seemoceinfrmiionplometica 1-519-3503221 Maple Leaf Loung: ne of fli Flight Itinerary raretg aon) Ottawa, Ottawa Int'l (vow) Thu 14- Apr2016 14:00 Acass Toronto, Pearson Int'l (vyz) Thu 14- Apr2016 16:00 Terminal AC8873! ‘Operated by "Air Canada Express - Flight Arrivals & Departures Air Canada 8 Departures 1822-7533 se | Meal Vouchers | On My Way status changes directly 10 my mobile phone or email, he online if my flight is on time, ¢ andl print my boarding pass. * Can my booking be chanyed o Durati Sor Toronto, Pearson Int'l yz) Thu 14- 0 Apr2016 15:07- Terminal 1 3hr0S 319 Windsor (vQG) Thu 14 0 Apr2016 17:05 Passenger Information ToT ROC a tts Air Canada - Acroplan Meal Preference: NonePayment Card: SNK AAANANKT7LS Special Needs: None Seat Selection: AC4S5 12C (Preferred) Paid . AC8873 1D (Preferred) Paid Purchase Summary Fare Summary Passenger Type Adult Air Transportation Charges Departing Flight- Tango 173.00 Surcharges 18.00 ‘Taxes, Fees and Charges Canada Airport Improvement Fee 27.00 ‘Canada Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST #10009-2287 RTOOOL) 29.2 Air Travellers tv ATSC) 742 Total before options (per passenger) 254.39 Number of passengers x1 Total with options 254.39 Seat Selection Mr Herb John ACASS: 12C - Preferred Seat (Aisle) 20.00 AC8873: 1D - Preferred Seat (Aisle) 20.00 (Canada Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST # 10009-2287 RT0001) ‘Total with options and seat selection f 5.20 Travel Insurance (declined) 0.00. Grand Total - Canadian dollars cent Information Credit/Debit Card xxxx-xxn-xxxx-7713 - Amount paid: $299.59 The following amount (tax inclusive) will appear on your eredit card or debit card statement Air Canada: $254.39 (Air Transp. Charges - per ticket) Air Canada: $45.20 (Advance Seat Selection - for passenger 1) Ticket number(s): 01421599395 14 Fare Rules Windsor (Cee Expires Sat, 16 Apr L£YE7 Ee 2.07 yvcr J Etlhe. Important Information + Remember to bring your itinerary and government-issued photo ID for airport check-in and security + We noticed you did not choose travel protection coverage when booking this flight. If you change your mind, you can purchase insurance prior to travel and receive your insurance certificate via email Important Information + Remember to brin our itinerary and government-issued photo ID for airport check-in and security. + We noticed you did not choose travel protection coverage when booking this flight. If you change your mind, you can purchase insurance prior to travel and receive your insurance certificate via email. Toronto (YYZ) — Ottawa (YOW) ana a ase vate ey CeCe meer ree arse ye Your reservation is booked and confirmed. There is no need to call us to Price Summary reconfirm this reservation, oon “Traveller 1s Adult csi70.36 erences Fright $330.00 Judith Duncan No frequent flyer details Ticket # 8381731246099 Spun ety SINR ul provided Total: C$470.36 * Seat assignments, special meals, frequent flyer point awards and special assistance Al prices quoted in Canadian dollar requests should be confirmed direetly ith the ailing 12 Apr 2016 - Departure Nonstop Totel travel tim Ons9m Toronto Ottawa 375 km YYZ: 2:00pm = YOW 2:59pm Add ional Flight Servi ices Terminal 3 Westlet 364 Economy / Coach (M) | Confirm seats withthe ailing * 14 Apr 2016 - Retum Nonstop Total travel time: 13m + The airline may charge additional fees (Opens a ner window) for checked baggage or other optional 3 ~1h3 im Ottawa Toroota et YOW 6:15pm YYZ. 7:18pm ‘Terminal 3 Westlet 371 Economy / Coach (M) | Confirm seats with the airline * Aili ine Rules & Regulations + We understand that sometimes plans change. We do not charge a cancel or change fee. When the airline charges such fees in accordance with its own policies, the cost will be passed on to you, ickets are nonrefundable, nontransferable and name changes are not allowed. + Please read the complete penalty rules for changes and cancellations (Opens a new window) applicable to this fare. + Please read important information regarding a lity limitations (Opens a new window) ‘or residents of Québec, prices include a contribution to the Indemnity Fund of C$1.00 per C$1,000 of travel services purchased, Need help with your reservation? + Visit our Customer Support page © Call us at 1-866-307-7601. + For faster service, mention itinerary #1132211807760 Complete Your Trip tee Giet around Add a Hotel Adda Car Travel Industry Couneil of Ontario services. Get out and explore Add an activity Get a Ride In accordance with the Ontario Travel Industry det, 2002, this poge contains detailed information on the names, addresses and repstation ners applicable tothe providers of travel and ticket fulfillment services. Ticket fulfilment services provided by Tour East Holidays (Canada) Ine. 15 Kern Road, Suite 9, Toronto, Ontario M3B 189, TICO Registration No.: $001S827Lys! io From: Air Canada Alp? Z- Sent More30-160151 Y Lit Te: es@ezepulvedacom I Subject: Air Canada -12-Apr: Toronto - Ottawa (booking ref: LHBW3M)- seat selected “™** PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS E-MAIL "***"" AIR CANADA @ Itinerary/Receipt ‘Your booking is confirmed. Please printretain this page for your financial records (e.g, for taxation, expense claim or payment card reconciliation purposes), We thank you for choosing Air Canada and look forward to welcoming you on board. oO Access your SS personalized Nee gone opensin A Canada travel New Window information Booking Information Customer Care coca: sreaess tab oe 22 Electronic Ticketing confirmed. This is your oficial gt Ariat and iineraryreceipt ea Main Contact: ‘Mr Edgardo Sepulveda es@esepulveda.com Mobile: 1-647-9886640 Home: 1-416-5361882 Work: 1-647-9886640 needyManage my booking online (view/change my booking; select seats"), Request an upgrade Maple Leaf Lounge | Meal Vouchers | On My Way Alert me of fight status changes directly to my mobile phone or email Flight Arrivals & Departures - check online if my flight is on time. Check-in online and print my boarding pass. Flight Itinerary * Can my booking be changed online? or See Toronto, Pearson inti O30 (vyz) acu Werear OOM anes ata ae. 2016 STO 12:13 Tema Toronto, tava, i Gtawa incr Pe8"80n it acesr YOM) Fear = theo? Ba mehr Rt 2016 208 Hee Terminal 1 Passenger Information BEL OCC Cn Cc Mech Me PPL kd Air Canada - 145204954 Meal None Aeroplan Preference Payment Card: xxxX-xXXx-x0X-005 Special Needs: None Seal Selection, _AC448 15D (Preferred) , AC457 14D (Preferred) Purchase Summary Fare Summary Passenger Type Adult i Type Flex, G Flex, G cr)Air Transportation Charges Departing Flight - Flex 165.00 Return Flight - Flex 185.00 Surcharges 24,00 Taxes, Fees and Charges Canada Airport improvement Fee 48.00 Canada Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST #10009-2287 RTO001) 54,11 Air Travellers Security Charge (ATSC) 14.25 Total before options (per passenger) 470.36 Number of passengers x4 Total with options 470.36 Travel Insurance (declined) 0.00 Grand Total - Canadian dollars $470.36 Payment Information Credit/Debit Card xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-005 - Amount paid: $470.36 ‘The following amount (tax inclusive) will appear on your credit card or debit card statement Air Canada: $470.36 (Air Transp. Charges - per ticket) Ticket number(s): 0142160633852 Fare Rules + Changes: © Prior to day of departure - Change fee per direction, per passenger, is $75 CAD plus applicable taxes and any additional fare difference. Changes can be made up to 2 hours prior to departure, Same-day confirmed changes at check-in or at the airport are permitted ata flat fee of §75 CAD/USD per direction, per passenger (subject to availabilty), Same-day flights only. Same-day standby is available’ on flights between Toronto and Montreal or Ottawa, ‘on flights between Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver, as well as on fights between Toronto Pearson (YYZ) and LaGuardia (LGA), John F’ Kennedy (JFK) or Newark (EWR) airports (connecting fights excluded), Flights can only be used in sequence from the place of departure specified on the: itinerary. + Cancellations: Tickets are non-refundable and non-transferable, Cancellations can be made up to 45 minutes prior to departure.VILLE DE GATINEAU STATIONNEMENT ~ LEDUC PAIEMENT AUTORISE JUSQU'AU 11-04-2016 rem ge iene 18:15 ue Espacest BS aie Montant rave Sitocsrtibses misoest 000 pi 7447522 ‘sumer ew eTUA Nae CHESEURT SUEUR ce VILLE DE GATINEAU ‘STATIONNEMENT - LEDUC Pood Gre PATEMENT AUTORISE USQUAU mare 19-04-2016 Sion a ot 16:04 wes Espace:43 toe se pasted SFSincoxrtzea74 o7aar tes oe suoryne SORE RSREEMI peerspaae Baan ree VILLE DE GATINEAU STATIONNEMENT - LEDUC Se a PAINE AUTORISEuSQU'AU cn 22-04-2016 micor2e ona 17:00 Seco Espacesao eit mene tae Memascmmia o74asies = RGSS Eaa REREERY Biscay at Beers VILLE DE GATINEAU yuurcecamens STATIONNEMENT ~ LEDUC Fre fe bcrice Cane PAIEMENT AUTORISE 3USQU'AU 28-04-2016 ro 17:00 ee Espaces40 tae Mice Maat a ms picorm 51400 O7448e8 as state TEREST GUAR SEGRE BREA [o” VILLE DE GATINEAU STATIONNEMENT - LEDUC PAIEMENT AUTORISE JUSQU'AU ies 11-04-2016 Sia ao irene WS 17:00 aa Espace:40 ine ne Meant a Sesion igor no hee 07447430, ew SEUUAE AARNE CuREIGRY omer VILLE DE GATINEAU STATIONNEMENT - LEDUC PAIEMENT AUTORSE ISQUA nar 14-04-2016 Searles 19:00 a Espace:39 bom sade enti eae 07447696, — Serre Sein RETR PSMA Saag VILLE DE GATINEAU STATIONNEMENT ~ LEDUC Se cols PAIEMENT AUTORISE JUSQU'AU_ ‘biteiae —— 21-04-2016 ‘cosa on 17:00 ie Espace-tt te 5 kane teeters 1S nameneaent mieorn 500 = o74astis a Seve Groechinea cemeubea: CON Se VILLE DE GATINEAU STATIONNEMENT - LEDUC PAIEMENT AUTORISE JUSQU'AU 26-04-2016 18:04 i= peceta tr cae? ace aie Pe Sembee | seats 678Received with Thanks = : = nese OW a= heed -TAXI COREGAL 81977-5231 = eee C1 CROWN 81977-1645 8 nee ies a a aa eect APPL | J Sve SEX mA ENSTAXL (Co REGAL 0 CROWN hg EL ET CRIN TAK 819 777-5231 819 777-1645 wae a om Sa Ee cust sce 104-2 enpen, a4 ‘maint 38 eis at ‘ane sos | raner wom us coms Sitneeto Sale }: eonaonoe: = a | sov:siounatet capital TAxXt rasta ss ‘anu aca ‘yoy Lael WS CET ata 38 waa | a i sesinin. 1: es os foo 2888 — /otal:CAD$ 11.50 | eee aes — oo ahaa aie or th swe | my ed i ae maePASSENGER COPY Proyrand 36 InPASSH COTE D'OR i captrat TAxT woe 1 za ee bras wenn im sano. i sw visa cue team $1 tore. * 1688 yy3/n018 12:28:49 Anves ez - 7 Batche; 107004 ais sat seat fetrvovas: tooo? aeRPASSENGER COPYHH" eins a aT a TR 6990009009, Tst Fo00 stresses eet 8 fai ihe np 1.88 40 ‘ath Code: 096078 APPROVED Custoneh copyoy) SE ‘SAMA (508) [S22] 2 FF =e F is a PLArR ant! ‘: 360 3 Ns St ; aaa) cn a a ena eat[ Novotel Otowa ae hcholae Stest ona, ON KIN OMT ‘Telephone: (613) 290-2039, Fax: (613) 760-4766 OTTAWA novotsionawa@noveteotawe.cam HSTITVH # Riae2s2514 Herb John moan Ns oS Arrival 04-13-16 Canad a Departure 04-14-16 Page No. tof Folio No. 150496 INFORMATION INVOICE ont. No. 228750 Membership No. Cashier No 82 AVR Number Group Code Company Name: PIAG - Public Interest Advocac 06-13-16 ‘Voucher No. Reference No. Date Description Charges Payments 04-13-46 Accommodation 169.00 04-13-46 Destination Marketing Fee 587 04-13-46 HST 25.31 04-14-16 American Express 219.98 XX000000000X2005 2OUKK Total 219.98 219.98 Balance 0.00 Thank you for staying at the Novotel Ottawa, we hope to welcome you again, Best price guaranteed by booking at www.novotelottawa.com Mone of our associates made your stay, you can nominate them for a Stars of the City Award www.starsofthecity.ca/nominate r if you would like to share any comments or concerns, do not hesitate to contact me, Danny Ponte, Front Office Manager at dannyponte@novotelottawa.comJudy Duncan Room No, ‘canade Astival Departure Page No, Folio No. INFORMATION INVOICE Conf. No. Membership No, Cashier No, AR Number Group Code Company Name: PIAC - Public Interest Advocac Voucher No. Reference No. Novotel Otawa 33 Nicholas Stroot ottawa, ON KIN SMT ‘olophone: (613) 230-2033, Fax: (613) 7004700, novotelottawagnevotelottawa.com HSTITVH # 8139252514 330 04-12-46 04-14-16 tft 150619 232203 7 06-14-16 Date Description Charges Payments 04-1246 Accommodation 156.00 04-12-46 Destination Marketing Fee 4.08 04-1246 HST 20.89 04-13-16 Accommodation 156.00 04-13-16 Destination Marketing Fee 4.88 04-13-16 HST 20.89 04-14-16 American Express 363.14 3000000000205 XXIKK Total 363.14 363.14 Balance 0.00 Thank you for staying at the Novotel Ottawa, we hope to welcome you again. Best price guaranteed by booking at www.novotelottawa.com www starsofthecity.ca/nominate Mone of our associates made your stay, you can nominate them for a Stars of the City Award Or if you would like to share any comments or concerns, do not hesitate to contact me, Danny Ponte, Front Office Manager at dannyponte@novotelottawa.comNovotel Ottawa as 33 Nicholas Stroat Telephone: (613) 230033, ax; (619) 7604766 | OTTAWA novotsiottawagnovotelottawa.com aoe, (tamer HST/TVH # R139252514 foeaieapa ao ee a are eer ee ee Bree eae sas = Oe Finn Ree 04-12-16 Accommodation 191.20 04-12-16 Destination Marketing Fee 5.74 Dea Be a 04-13-16 — Accommodation 191.20 04-14-16 Destination Marketing Fee 454

Вам также может понравиться

• Federal Court: T-1335-21 May 16 2022

  

  Документ71 страница

  Federal Court: T-1335-21 May 16 2022

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Factum - Federal Court of Appeal

  

  Документ48 страниц

  Factum - Federal Court of Appeal

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• World Mobile Press Release 20221128

  

  Документ4 страницы

  World Mobile Press Release 20221128

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• • Журналы
  • Подкасты
  • Нотное издание
• 200804-Bell Mobility - TNC 2019-57 - Procedural Request - Competition Bureau Matrix Report-1

  

  Документ7 страниц

  200804-Bell Mobility - TNC 2019-57 - Procedural Request - Competition Bureau Matrix Report-1

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Scotiabank Telecommunication Services

  

  Документ8 страниц

  Scotiabank Telecommunication Services

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• CRTC Policy Direction Signed Order

  

  Документ7 страниц

  CRTC Policy Direction Signed Order

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• DM#3900357 - Procedural Request - 200804-Bell Mobility - TNC 2019-57 - Competition Bureau Matrix Report - ATT - ABR PDF

  

  Документ9 страниц

  DM#3900357 - Procedural Request - 200804-Bell Mobility - TNC 2019-57 - Competition Bureau Matrix Report - ATT - ABR PDF

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Decision - Federal Court - Shoan V A-G - 2 September 2016 PDF

  

  Документ51 страница

  Decision - Federal Court - Shoan V A-G - 2 September 2016 PDF

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Iristel Answer 20161213

  

  Документ33 страницы

  Iristel Answer 20161213

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Federal Court: GoldTV Blocking Order Date: 20191115

  

  Документ47 страниц

  Federal Court: GoldTV Blocking Order Date: 20191115

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• The 2017 Canadian Telecom Summit Brochure

  

  Документ6 страниц

  The 2017 Canadian Telecom Summit Brochure

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Assassin 20140706

  

  Документ2 страницы

  Assassin 20140706

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• The 2016 Canadian Telecom Summit Ad

  

  Документ1 страница

  The 2016 Canadian Telecom Summit Ad

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• The 2016 Canadian Telecom Summit Brochure

  

  Документ6 страниц

  The 2016 Canadian Telecom Summit Brochure

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Bell 2016-37

  

  Документ8 страниц

  Bell 2016-37

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Mandate Letter To JP Blais

  

  Документ2 страницы

  Mandate Letter To JP Blais

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Rogers Comments On Videotron Unlimited Music - CRTC File No 8661-P8-201510199

  

  Документ11 страниц

  Rogers Comments On Videotron Unlimited Music - CRTC File No 8661-P8-201510199

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Letter From Industry Canada

  

  Документ3 страницы

  Letter From Industry Canada

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Cleric Spreading Hate' On Local TV: New Year'S Treat: Canada Versus U.S

  

  Документ1 страница

  Cleric Spreading Hate' On Local TV: New Year'S Treat: Canada Versus U.S

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Federal Court: TELUS Spectrum Transfer

  

  Документ38 страниц

  Federal Court: TELUS Spectrum Transfer

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Scotia Capital TELUS - Mobilicity 3 Times A Charm?

  

  Документ8 страниц

  Scotia Capital TELUS - Mobilicity 3 Times A Charm?

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• The 2014 Canadian Telecom Summit

  

  Документ6 страниц

  The 2014 Canadian Telecom Summit

  Mark Goldberg

  Оценок пока нет
• Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race

  

  От Everand

  Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race

  Margot Lee Shetterly

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (895)
• The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life

  

  От Everand

  The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life

  Mark Manson

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (5794)
• Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike

  

  От Everand

  Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike

  Phil Knight

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (537)
• Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance

  

  От Everand

  Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance

  Angela Duckworth

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (588)
• The Yellow House: A Memoir (2019 National Book Award Winner)

  

  От Everand

  The Yellow House: A Memoir (2019 National Book Award Winner)

  Sarah M. Broom

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (98)
• Principles: Life and Work

  

  От Everand

  Principles: Life and Work

  Ray Dalio

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (599)
• Yes Please

  

  От Everand

  Yes Please

  Amy Poehler

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (1891)
• The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living

  

  От Everand

  The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living

  Meik Wiking

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (400)
• Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It

  

  От Everand

  Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It

  Chris Voss

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (838)
• Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future

  

  От Everand

  Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future

  Ashlee Vance

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (474)
• A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True Story

  

  От Everand

  A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True Story

  Dave Eggers

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (231)
• Rise of ISIS: A Threat We Can't Ignore

  

  От Everand

  Rise of ISIS: A Threat We Can't Ignore

  Jay Sekulow

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (137)
• The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer

  

  От Everand

  The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer

  Siddhartha Mukherjee

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (271)
• Fear: Trump in the White House

  

  От Everand

  Fear: Trump in the White House

  Bob Woodward

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (738)
• Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America

  

  От Everand

  Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America

  Gilbert King

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (266)
• The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers

  

  От Everand

  The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers

  Ben Horowitz

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (345)
• On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal

  

  От Everand

  On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal

  Naomi Klein

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (74)
• The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century

  

  От Everand

  The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century

  Thomas L. Friedman

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (2259)
• Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln

  

  От Everand

  Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln

  Doris Kearns Goodwin

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (234)
• The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America

  

  От Everand

  The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America

  George Packer

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (45)
• The Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You're Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You Are

  

  От Everand

  The Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You're Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You Are

  Brené Brown

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (1090)
• Angela's Ashes: A Memoir

  

  От Everand

  Angela's Ashes: A Memoir

  Frank McCourt

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (440)
• Steve Jobs

  

  От Everand

  Steve Jobs

  Walter Isaacson

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (806)
• Bad Feminist: Essays

  

  От Everand

  Bad Feminist: Essays

  Roxane Gay

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (1016)
• The Glass Castle: A Memoir

  

  От Everand

  The Glass Castle: A Memoir

  Jeannette Walls

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (1713)
• John Adams

  

  От Everand

  John Adams

  David McCullough

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (2409)
• The Outsider: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  The Outsider: A Novel

  Stephen King

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (1839)
• The Light Between Oceans: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  The Light Between Oceans: A Novel

  M.L. Stedman

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (789)
• Brooklyn: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  Brooklyn: A Novel

  Colm Toibin

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (1937)
• The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)

  

  От Everand

  The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)

  Viet Thanh Nguyen

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (121)
• The Woman in Cabin 10

  

  От Everand

  The Woman in Cabin 10

  Ruth Ware

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (2322)
• Little Women

  

  От Everand

  Little Women

  Louisa May Alcott

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (104)
• A Man Called Ove: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  A Man Called Ove: A Novel

  Fredrik Backman

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (4610)
• Wolf Hall: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  Wolf Hall: A Novel

  Hilary Mantel

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (3811)
• Manhattan Beach: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  Manhattan Beach: A Novel

  Jennifer Egan

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (792)
• The Perks of Being a Wallflower

  

  От Everand

  The Perks of Being a Wallflower

  Stephen Chbosky

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (2104)
• The Art of Racing in the Rain: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  The Art of Racing in the Rain: A Novel

  Garth Stein

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (4200)
• The Constant Gardener: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  The Constant Gardener: A Novel

  John le Carré

  Рейтинг: 3.5 из 5 звезд

  3.5/5 (104)
• A Tree Grows in Brooklyn

  

  От Everand

  A Tree Grows in Brooklyn

  Betty Smith

  Рейтинг: 4.5 из 5 звезд

  4.5/5 (1929)
• Her Body and Other Parties: Stories

  

  От Everand

  Her Body and Other Parties: Stories

  Carmen Maria Machado

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (821)
• Sing, Unburied, Sing: A Novel

  

  От Everand

  Sing, Unburied, Sing: A Novel

  Jesmyn Ward

  Рейтинг: 4 из 5 звезд

  4/5 (1103)