Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The industrial manufacture processes of three kinds of roll core used ductile irons have been investigated
via systematical experiments. Effects of the ratio of C/Si, pig iron, nodularizer and alloying method on the
microstructure and mechanical properties of the heavy section ductile iron have been analyzed. It has been
found that when treated with RE-Mg plus Sb, high quality nodular castings can be produced even if much
anti spheroidizing alloy elements are included in the pig iron. The alloy element Sb played an important role
in the control of graphite morphology.
KEY WORDS: Centrifugal casting; Roll; Heavy section ductile iron; Micro-alloying with Sb
1. Introduction
Ductile iron, as the material for the roll neck and
roll core of centrifugal composite casting rolls, has
been widely used for a long time[1] . With the development of rolling technology, mechanical properties
of the ductile iron will face higher requirements. The
tensile strength of the roll cores should increase to
400 MPa[2] . In general, the diameter of roll necks is
400600 mm and that of roll cores is 5001000 mm,
which belongs to heavy-section ductile iron. The slow
solidification rate and long eutectic freezing time of
heavy section castings tend to cause graphite degeneration, the formation of chunky graphite, graphite
flotation and intercrystalline carbide, which leads to
the decrease in mechanical properties[35] .
During the process of heat treatment, high thermal stress and structural stress arise on the interface of composite rolls, which therefore puts forward
higher requirements for the properties of the ductile iron. In order to obtain fine metallurgical fusion
on the working layer materials and the ductile iron
Corresponding author. Ph.D.; Tel./Fax: +86 24 23971429;
E-mail address: xhkang@imr.ac.cn (X.H. Kang).
854
C
3.003.20
3.103.30
3.203.40
Ni
<0.50
0.500.60
<0.50
Si
2.602.80
2.402.50
2.102.30
Mo
<0.20
0.250.35
<0.10
Mn
<0.30
0.400.60
0.300.50
Cu
P
<0.06
<0.08
<0.08
Sb
S
<0.02
<0.02
<0.015
Re
0.400.50
<0.01
0.0150.020
0.010.03
0.010.03
Cr
<0.10
0.300.50
<0.10
Mg
0.050.08
0.030.06
0.020.05
Chemical composition
I
I
II
III
III
Pig iron
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(b)
Nodulizer
M
M
R
R
R
Alloying
Ni, Cr, Mo
Cu, Mn, Sb
Cu, Mn, Sb
Subject
Roll neck
Simulated sample
Roll neck
Roll neck
Quenched sample
Size/mm
460 1850
460 1850
460 1850
460 1850
24
855
etched with 2% nitric acid alcohol solution. Microstructure analysis was carried out by optical
microscope.
Figs. 14 show the microstructure
of the roll neck and the simulated specimens, in
which Figs. 1(a)4(a) show general morphologies and
Figs. 1(b)4(b) the details of the carbide or graphite
in different ductile irons. From Figs. 1 and 2, it can
be seen that the quality of the pig iron affects the
morphology of graphite. The matrix of the ductile
iron made of high quality pig iron is composed of ferrite and pearlite, as shown in Fig. 1. Statistical tests
have been carried out on ten images for this sample.
The tested fraction of the cementite is less than 5%,
856
Position
Roll neck inlet
Simulated sample inlet
Roll neck inlet
Roll neck inlet
Rm /(N/mm2 )
430450
390420
520550
580620
A/%
3.04.5
2.53.5
1.52.5
2.53.5
Ak /(J/cm2 )
911
810
46
79
Hardness, HB
220260
200230
240280
240270
The ductile iron in experimental scheme C has a lowest toughness because of the high content of cementite. Although ductile iron D is made of averagequality pig iron, small and spherical graphite distributes on the fine pearlite matrix, and accordingly the
overall mechanical properties are very good.
There is a relation between the mechanical properties and the microstructure of ductile iron D. Fig. 5
shows the tensile fracture of ductile iron D under
SEM. Spherical graphite departs from the matrix at
their boundaries, and the matrix has a characteristic
of cleavage fracture. He et al.[20,21] show that when
ductile iron suffers from uniaxial tensile stress, microcracks initiate at the interfaces between matrix and
graphite which are vertical to the tensile stress, and
then extend along the interfaces. The interfaces provide fracture resistance to the cracks, and therefore
the spherical graphite has a stronger ability of passivating the cracks and providing fracture resistance
than the degenerated graphite. Fig. 6 shows the
857
Center
wt%
at.%
15.50 34.54
3.32
5.55
22.75 25.04
0.58
0.56
22.39 18.69
1.80
5.11
0.76
27.78
1.20
0.98
0.14
13.31
Fringe
wt%
at.%
17.80 43.48
13.71
1.87
9.53
1.00
0.73
1.79
16.54
1.96
8.72
0.24
0.53
0.38
53.58
28.15
Fig. 7 SEM photographs of the spherical graphite in Scheme E, (a) graphite centre, (b) EDS analysis at the
center, (c) graphite fringe, (d) EDS analysis at the fringe
858