Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ASSESSMENT AND
RISK MANAGEMENT
Chris Sproat
Overview
All dental procedures carry inherent risks which must be
assessed and dealt with appropriately. The decision to
proceed with a course of treatment will depend on two
major factors:
1. Professional dental opinion
2. Patients perceived need.
In order to carry out safe and effective treatment each
patient must be assessed to identify and quantify the risks
involved. The risk/benet analysis must be explained to
the patient and informed consent obtained.
As dental practitioners we are in the unique situation of
regularly reviewing a large cohort of healthy patients
who may display oral manifestations of as yet undiagnosed systemic disease. In order to make the correct diagnosis and give appropriate advice it is necessary to have
an understanding of diseases that commonly present in
the head and neck region.
The safety of dental procedures carried out under local
anaesthetic is generally good. The risks of a procedure can
be increased by the:
health status of the patient
complexity and duration of the case
degree of invasiveness
experience and skill of the operator
addition of sedation or general anaesthetic.
Risk can be minimised by an adequate pre-procedure
assessment and working within your own and the practices limits.
Ch01-F10098.indd 1
9/1/2006 10:46:09 AM
Assessment
Ch01-F10098.indd 2
This begins when you rst see the patient in the waiting
room and should continue throughout the treatment into
the postoperative phase as you monitor the patients
wellbeing.
Clues to the functional status of the patient can be
obtained as they enter the surgery and position themselves
in the dental chair, for example, do they have difculty or
require assistance?
The most reliable method of obtaining a patients medical
history is to use a combination of direct questioning
and a condential questionnaire. If further information
is required then the general medical practitioner or hospital physician should be contacted. In the case of children
the relevant information will often come from the parents
but remember to involve the child as appropriate.
Patients who are not able give an adequate or reliable
history for example, some psychiatric patients and
stroke victims are often escorted by a carer who
may be able to assist in obtaining the necessary history.
A typical medical history questionnaire is shown in
Figure 1.1.
Patients must be given adequate time and the necessary
help to complete the medical history questionnaire. Disabled patients may require special format versions, for
example, large print.
During the verbal history it is good practice to use a
combination of open questions, for example, are you
generally well? and follow this with closed questions
about specic diseases, for example, have you had rheumatic fever?. For any conditions detected it is necessary to
determine severity and the impact on the patients functional status; for example, for asthma, how often do they
have attacks and does it limit their daily life?
The ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
classication of physical status of patients (Table 1.1) is
a useful guide to determine the likely risk of a procedure.
Patients in ASA groups I and II are normally safe to
treat in general dental practice. Those who are ASA III
and IV should receive treatment only in specialist
centres.
9/1/2006 10:46:09 AM
Assessment
No.
Name
D.O.B.
YES NO
CHECKED BY
DATE
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
Ch01-F10098.indd 3
9/1/2006 10:46:09 AM
Table 1.1
The ASA guidelines used to quantify the impact of systemic
disease on the functional status of the patient.
ASA classication
I
II
Healthy
Presence of systemic disease with no
effect on normal function, e.g. well
controlled diabetes
Presence of systemic disease which
limits function, e.g. poorly controlled
epilepsy
Presence of systemic disease which is a
constant threat to life, e.g. severe
coronary artery disease
Patient not expected to survive more
than 24 hours
III
IV
V
Ch01-F10098.indd 4
9/1/2006 10:46:10 AM
Risk management
Risk management
Focused risk management strategies looking at patient
safety are a key issue in dental practice.
Before embarking on any treatment a risk assessment
must be made and equated to the proposed benet to
the patient, forming the basis of our professional opinion.
The information should be delivered to the patient in an
understandable form so that informed consent can be
obtained.
Once the decision has been made that a patient is suitable for routine dental treatment the patient can be placed
in one of three broad groups in terms of risk:
1. High risk
2. Medium risk
3. Low risk.
Those in the high-risk group require some form of action
to be taken before treatment is carried out, for example,
patients with replacement heart valves require antibiotic
cover for invasive dental procedures, those on warfarin
require an INR (International Normalised Ratio) check
pre-operatively.
The medium risk group have a systemic disease that
requires monitoring but does not pose an immediate
problem for dental treatment, for example, well controlled
asthma.
The vast majority of patients form the low-risk group
and these are t and healthy people with no history of
systemic disease.
Patients may migrate from one group to another as
their health status changes. This requires frequent
reassessment of the medical history and examination of the patient. The triad of risk is shown in Figure
1.2.
Most risks can be quantied and treatment modied
accordingly; however, there are those emergency situations in which an unpredictable event occurs, for
example, an anaphylactic reaction. In this circumstance
risk management involves early identication of the
problem, the availability of appropriate equipment and
adequate training of the dental staff to deal with the
situation.
Ch01-F10098.indd 5
9/1/2006 10:46:10 AM
High risk
Medium risk
Low risk
Fig. 1.2 The triad of risk used in assessment of patients for
dental treatment.
Consent
Before you examine, treat or care for patients you must
obtain their consent. This is not a one-off event but a continual process and the patient can withdraw consent at any
time.
In order for consent to be valid the following criteria
should be met:
Explanation. An adequate explanation of the proposed
treatment, including the risks and benets, should be
discussed in a manner and language acceptable to the
patient.
Capability. The patient should be capable of giving
consent. All adults are assumed competent unless
proved otherwise.
Voluntary. Consent should be given voluntarily by the
patient.
Ch01-F10098.indd 6
9/1/2006 10:46:10 AM
Ch01-F10098.indd 7
9/1/2006 10:46:10 AM