Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
B Mahadevan
Week 5
Quality Management
Six Sigma Quality An introduction
An introduction
Introduction
Business
Customers
Retail
Customers
Total
247,010
2,520,874
2,767,884
Error Rate
0.50%
1.10%
1.05%
Defective Policies
1,235
27,730
28,965
This implies that at a nearly 99% quality level, 28,965 customers would have been
unsatisfied with the service that they have received from the company during the year.
Superior Quality
control
Fewer
Rework
Less Indirect
costs
Fewer Disruptions
in Operations
High quality
Finished goods
Smoother
Output
Less
inventory
Greater
Productivity
Quality Management
Changing Perceptions
Yesterday
It is often uneconomical to make
quality improvements since it brings down
productivity, increases cost and investment.
Today
Productivity goes up and cost comes
down as quality goes up. This fact is
known, but not necessarily to everyone.
If in a process
Number of opportunities for making a defect per unit of execution of
that process = k
Number of units of observation of the process = n
Number of defects that occurred in that process during the
observation = d
d
DPMO then will be =
* 1,000,000
k *n
1,000,000
357
1,000,000
1,25011
= , .
DMAIC Methodology
Define
Measure
Control
Analyze
Improve
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 575.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
DMAIC Methodology
Define
Define the problem, the requirements, project scope, project charter
Set goals for improvement
Measure
Identify variables to be measured, the type of measurement
Data collection and synthesis
Analyze
Develop a set of tools for analysis
Apply graphical tools of analysis
Identify possible sources of variation and vital few root causes
Explore means of eliminating them
Improve
Generate & validate improvement alternatives
Process Owner
Supervisor or a manager who takes responsibility for various steps of
a process that delivers some output to the customer.
It could be the in a particular work area where the improvement
project has been identified
Team Leader & Members
Team leader (the project leader) and the members will comprise of
the employees in the chosen work area
They will have day-to-day operational control of activities
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Quality Management
Total Quality Management
Quality Gurus
Demings contributions
Philip Crosby
Absolutes of Quality
Salient features
Role of
Top Management
Quality
System
Employee Involvement
Training & Team Work
Employee Involvement
Top Management
Commitment to
Quality
Quality
Assurance
System
Employee involvement
for continuous focus
on quality
improvement
Quality
Certifications &
Benchmarking
exercises
Documentation of all
quality related
initiatives for
continuous learning &
improvement
Methods for
preventing
recurrence of
problems
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 350.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Quality Control
Highlighting Problems
Control Charts
Identifying Improvement
Opportunities
Histograms
Check Sheets
Pareto Diagrams
Scatter Diagrams
Graphs
Quality Management
Affinity Diagram
Relationship Diagram
Tree Diagram
Matrix Diagram
Matrix Data Analysis
Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC)
Arrow Diagram
Poka Yoke (Fool Proofing)
Strategic Planning
Number of
occurrences
25
24
5
26
5
15
Histogram
25
25.0
26.0
24.0
20
15
15.0
10
05
5.0
LEAKAGE
MISSING
5.0
FOULING
REWORKS
Categories of problems
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3rd Edition, pp 339.
POOR
ROUTING
LOOSE
FITTING
05
Pareto Diagram
80.0
70.0
20.0
60.0
15.0
50.0
40.0
10.0
30.0
20.0
5.0
Number of occurences
30.0
10.0
0.0
0.0
Reworks
Leakage
Missing
Fouling
Categories of problems
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 340.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Number of
Causes for rework
occurrences
Lack of drawing clarity
23
Tooling problems
15
Process control issues
6
Design issues
33
Vendor related problems
23
Number of occurences
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Lack of
drawing
clarity
Tooling
problems
Process
control
issues
Categories of problems
Design
issues
Reworks Analysis
35.0
Vendor
related
problems
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Design
issues
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
35.0
Number of occurences
Rework Analysis
Categories of problems
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Materials
Work methods
Quality
Equipment
Labour
Cause
Effect
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 340.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 328.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
An example
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 341.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Poka Yoke
POKA YOKE
An example
Matrix Diagram
Same
Better
A - Product cost
B - Product quality
C - Engg. Quality
D - Enquiry lead time
E - Mfg. lead time
F - Delivery reliability
G - Design flexibility
H - Delivery flexibility
I - Volume flexibility
J - Service support
Worst
Less
Important
Qualifying
Order
Winning
Links
customer
needs to
design
attributes
Links
design
attributes to
actions firms
can take
Links
actions to
implementaction
decisions
Links
implementaction to
process
plans
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 344.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
House of Quality
5. Tradeoffs
2. Importance
1. Customer
requirements
3. Product
characteristics
4. Relationship
matrix
6. Benchmarks
House of
Quality
+
-+
++
++
--
--
A,B
A,B
X,B
X,A,B
A B
X
X- Own Company
A - Competitor A
B - Competitor B
(5 is best)
1
2
3
A
Target Values
++
++
Importance Weighting
Number of tables
available
Competitive Evaluation
Number of service
counters in peak time
++
Thickness of packing
material
++
Steaming hot
Customer
Requirements
Temperature of cooked
item
Technical
Characteristics
An
illustration
for a
Restaurant
A
B
X
A B
Importance Scale:
Strong: 9
Medium: 3
Small: 1
5
Technical Evaluation
(5 is best)
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 315.
Quality Management
Statistical Process Control (SPC) - Fundamentals
SPC An Introduction
Assignable Causes
Non-random variations due to assignable causes
Examples
Type of Applications
Manufacturing
Service Systems
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 581.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Choosing a characteristic
Measurement Methods
Attribute Based
Measurement Methods
Variable Based
Types of Charts
Logic of Charts
Normal Distribution
Logic of Charts
Control Chart
A generalized representation
+
Control Chart
A generalized representation
Out of control
indication
Process Average
Quality Management
Setting up a Control Chart
P chart, c chart
,
Sampling Plan
Sample every 20 minutes
Each time take five
consecutive samples
(Sample size is 5)
Take 15 such samples
Sub-groups
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
12.45
12.55
12.46
12.38
12.37
12.45
12.46
12.44
12.44
12.35
12.36
12.51
12.38
12.41
12.37
5
12.40
12.44
12.36
12.40
12.41
12.41
12.44
12.39
12.55
12.38
12.40
12.39
12.44
12.36
12.37
Average Range
(R)
12.434
0.17
12.432
0.17
12.410
0.11
12.420
0.17
12.416
0.08
12.410
0.08
12.426
0.15
12.408
0.08
12.470
0.18
12.400
0.10
12.388
0.05
12.408
0.15
12.428
0.13
12.398
0.09
12.408
0.08
12.417 0.119
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 584.
Sample
size (n)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
A2
D3
D4
1.880
1.023
0.729
0.577
0.483
0.419
0.373
0.337
0.308
0
0
0
0
0
0.076
0.136
0.184
0.223
3.268
2.574
2.282
2.114
2.004
1.924
1.864
1.816
1.777
In our example,
A2 = 0.577; D3 = 0; D4 = 2.144
X-bar Chart
Centre Line
UCL
LCL
12.50
12.49
12.48
12.47
12.46
12.45
12.44
12.43
12.42
12.41
12.40
12.39
12.38
12.37
12.36
12.35
12.34
1
9
8
7
Sample Number
10
11
12
13
14
15
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 585.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
R Chart
An example
R Chart
Sample Range
Centre Line
UCL
LCL
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.20
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
1
Sample Number
10
11
12
13
14
15
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 585.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
P Chart
Step 1: Choose the measurement characteristic:
Diameter of a cylindrical component (cm)
Sample no.
Number of defects
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
10
9
8
11
7
12
7
10
13
12
13
14
Number of
defects
10
9
8
11
7
12
7
10
13
12
13
14
p
(%)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.11
0.07
0.12
0.07
0.10
0.13
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.105
Average of all 12 observations
* All values in the table in centimeters
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
P Chart
p Chart
p
Centre Line
UCL
LCL
0.21
Proportion of defects
0.18
0.15
0.12
0.09
0.06
0.03
0.00
1
6
7
Sample No.
10
11
12
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 587.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
C Charts
Quality Management
Using the Control Charts
Centre Line
UCL
LCL
24
21
Number of defects
18
15
12
9
6
3
0
1
5
6
Sample No.
10
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 588.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Steps to be taken
Step 1: Remove the outlier and re-compute the control limits (revise the
chart parameters)
Step 2: Perform a detailed investigation to explore any assignable causes
for the drift in the performance
Step 3: If there are no assignable causes, resume the process with
revised control parameters
Step 4: If there are assignable causes implement countermeasures, and
resume the process
Step 5: Stabilize the process, re-establish control limits and ensure the
process is in control
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Zones A, B and C
Mean
Zone A
Zone B
Zone C
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 590.
Process B is better
than Process A
Spread of a process is
indicative of its
capability
Lesser the spread
better is the process
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson Education, 3 rd Edition, pp 591.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Offset
Process B
Process A
LSL
Source: Mahadevan, B. (2015), Operations Management: Theory & Practice, Pearson
Education, 3 rd
Target
Edition, pp 592.
USL
Process Capability
Cp =
Pr ocess Capability
6
Min
,
3
3
0.25
453,255 ppm
0.50
133,614 ppm
0.60
71,861 ppm
0.80
16,395 ppm
1.00
2,700 ppm
1.20
318 ppm
1.50
7 ppm
1.70
0.34 ppm
2.00
0.0018 ppm
Source: Quality Planning & Analysis, Juran & Gryna, Chapter 17, 3e
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Quality Management
Issues in Service Quality
Example
Example
Intangibility
Heterogeneity
Simultaneity
Service Quality
Some considerations
Service quality is
A measure of how well the service delivered
matches with expectations
Pre-dominantly is a function of perceptions of the
customers
(Example of the weekend course in a Business School)
Service Quality
Some considerations
Service Quality
Consumer
Firm
Perceived Service
Service Delivery
Gap 4
External Communications
to Consumers
Gap 3
Translation of perceptions
into Service Qlty. Specs.
Gap 1
Gap 2
Management perceptions of
Consumer Expectations
Source: Parasuraman, A., Zeithhaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L., (1985), A conceptual model of service quality & its
implications for future research, Journal of Marketing, 49 (4), 41 50.
All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Service Quality
Concluding Remarks