Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
form of Neo-Colonialism?*
Gabriel Jimnez Pea**
Fecha de recepcin: 17 de julio de 2014
Fecha de aceptacin: 3 de octubre de 2014
Fecha de modificacin: 26 de octubre de 2014
ABSTRACT
In this paper I will defend that development is a form of neocolonialism. In order to do so, I distinguish between a nuanced point of view and a radical one. I will present first (I) the
origins and the roots of the development in the colonialism,
then (II) the radical position and, finally (III) the nuanced
one, in order to show why this is a stronger argument to defend the general thesis of this paper.
Keywords
development, neocolonialism.
O desenvolvimento uma
Forma de Neocolonialismo?
RESUMEN
RESUMO
Palabras clave
Desarrollo, neocolonialismo.
Palavras-chave
Desenvolvimento. Neocolonialismo.
38
2015
This point of view, that I name the radical one, is represented by Goldsmith (1997) and others, and considers Development as a form of neocolonialism in the
extent to which its main target is merely to open up
markets, to ensure the laissez faire or free global market
in order to obtain raw materials. This kind of conspiracy theory explains development as being the result of
a predetermined plot by the IMF and the World Bank.
Thus, in this radical view, modern development is a
colonialism repacked (Goldsmith, 1997) and there is
continuity between both practices and together are
doctrines of indirect and direct intervention.
The arguments for this view are the following. First,
development as neo-colonialism is not a matter of free
choice for the Third World, but a matter of violent
2015
39
40
2015
REFERENCES
2015
41
42
2015