Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Republic of the Philippines

8th Judicial Region


REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
BRANCH 20
Catarman, Northern Samar
In the Matter of the Petition for the
Issuance of New Owners Transfer
Certificate of Title No. T-7222, in the
366
Name of Arthur L. Uy,

LRC Case No.

ARTHUR L. UY,
Petitioner,
-versusThe Register of Deeds
for Northern Samar, and
The Solicitor General,
Respondents.
X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -/

FORMAL OFFER OF DOCUMENTARY EXHIBITS


PETITIONER by counsel respectfully offers in
evidence the following documentary exhibits:
Exhibit
No.
A

Nature of Document Purpose


Amended Petition
Certified Electronic Copy of
TCT No. T-7222 in the name
of Arthur Uy (identified by
the Register of Deeds to be a
faithful reproduction of the
original Transfer Certificate
of Title on file)
Affidavit of Loss

C
Release of Real Estate
Mortgage
D

Order of the Court

To prove the ownership by the


petitioner of the subject
property, and that there was a
memorandum annotated in the
title regarding the fact of loss of
the owners copy of such title.
To prove that the original copy
of TCT No. T-7222 was lost
while in the possession of the
petitioner.
To prove that while there is an
encumbrance (mortgage in favour of
PNB) annotated in the TCT, such was
already settled and thus merit
cancellation by ROD by virtue of the
this exhibit.
To prove that the petition was

dated

F-1

G-1

H-1

July 2-3, 2014 issue of


Nio Parazzi
Newspaper

Page 11 of the July 2-3,


2014 issue of Nio
Parazzi Newspaper

July 9-10, 2014 issue of


Nio Parazzi
Newspaper

Page 11 of the July 2-3,


2014 issue of Nio
Parazzi Newspaper

July 16-17, 2014 issue


of Nio Parazzi
Newspaper

Page 11 of the July 1617, 2014 issue of Nio


Parazzi Newspaper

Affidavit of Publication
executed by the
Justiniano B. Adrales, Jr.
dated July 18, 2014

found by the court to be


sufficient in form and substance
and that the hearing of the
same needs to be published in
a newspaper of general
circulation.
To prove that Order of the court
marked as Exhibit E was
published in a newspaper of
general circulation on the first
week of a three consecutive
week-publication.
To prove that Order of the court
marked as Exhibit E was
published in a newspaper of
general circulation on the first
week of a three consecutive
week-publication.
To prove that Order of the court
marked as Exhibit E was
published in a newspaper of
general circulation on the
second week of a three
consecutive week-publication.
To prove that Order of the court
marked as Exhibit E was
published in a newspaper of
general circulation on the
second week of a three
consecutive week-publication.
To prove that Order of the court
marked as Exhibit E was
published in a newspaper of
general circulation on the third
week of a three consecutive
week-publication.
To prove that Order of the court
marked as Exhibit E was
published in a newspaper of
general circulation on the third
week of a three consecutive
week-publication.
To prove that the publisher of
the Nio Parazzi Newspaper has
caused the publication of the
Order marked as Exhibit E,
and such was published for
three consecutive weeks, and
that the three-week publication
was already completed.

WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed Honorable


Court that the following documentary exhibits be admitted in
evidence for the purposes for which they are offered.

Other reliefs which are just and equitable under the


premises are likewise prayed for.
Catarman, Northern Samar. July 13, 2016.

HERBERT B. MISCREOLA
Counsel for the Petitioner
Roll No. 63998; IBP No. 0996813 Jan. 4, 2016
PTR No. 3109365 Jan. 4, 2016
MCLE Compliance No. V-0009533 July 20, 2015
419 Quirino St., Brgy. JP Rizal, Catarman, N. Samar
Mobile No. 09477003483 Email add:
clutzmacy@gmail.com

Copy furnished:
The Register of Deeds for Northern Samar
JP Rizal St., Catarman, Northern Samar
For the Solicitor General:
Hon. Gretchen C. Obieta,
For the Solicitor General
OPP, Catarman, Northern Samar

Вам также может понравиться