Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Rebekah Kohler
The researchers are trying to prove that lost and discarded fishing gear in the ocean is a
significant cause of deaths and injuries to marine wildlife along the coast of California.
Fishing gear in the marine environment is a significant cause of injury in coastal California
marine wildlife. (Dau, Gilardi, Gulland, Higgins, Holcomb, Leger, Ziccardi)
Materials and Methods
The information gathered was specific to Brown Pelicans, gulls, California sea lions,
northern elephant seals, and Pacific harbor seals because those animals are in large
population near Californias coast. These species are also known to live or congregate near
areas where fishing is popular. They researched the medical records for these animals from
certain California wildlife rehabilitation centers. They looked at the records that included
injuries caused by entanglement in fishing gear, and injuries caused by ingestion of fishing
gear.
They measured their information statistically, comparing data in a spreadsheet program
and then used statistic specific software to measure the ratios. They calculated the total
number of injuries (by any cause) per species and compared that to the number of injuries
that occurred due specifically to fishing gear.
Results
Researchers looked at 9,668 records or cases of injuries and deaths and found out that
1,090 of them were related to fishing gear, or 11.3%. Some of the specific injuries included;
entanglement of legs, wing, flippers; lacerations of legs, wings, flippers; hooks being
embedded inside the animal do to ingestion, or otherwise imbedded in the animals wing, leg
or flipper. The percentage of injuries do to fishing gear varied for the different species, with
Rebekah Kohler
the pelicans having the highest percentage of related injuries and deaths at an average of
31.1% average yearly.
The data gathered was sometimes surprising, in that, certain species seemed to be more
prone to being injured do to fishing gear than others (such as the pelicans). Other factors that
were somewhat unexpected, such as location, time of year, age of the animal, and gender,
also played a role in the likelihood of animals injury.
Discussion
The study proved that a significant number of injuries and deaths (1,090) caused to gulls,
pelicans, and pinnipeds (seals, and sea lions), were influenced or caused by lost or discarded
fishing gear. On average, injuries and deaths related to fishing gear for each specie was about
3/10 cases for pelicans, 1/10 for gulls, and 3/100 for pinnipeds yearly. This proves that if
clean up projects can be established along the coast of California, a little over 1000 lives of
marine wildlife species may be saved or protected annually.
The results of the research project were hard to summarize because the researchers felt
that there were many factors that could not be fully measured in the study. There may be
other species affected by fishing gear than those that were included in this study, therefore,
further and more in-depth study may prove that the negative effect of fishing gear on marine
wildlife near California is even more severe than proven by this study alone.
The researchers only used records and medical cases from 7 different marine wildlife
rehabilitation centers along the California coast. The information gathered came from cases
of animals that were living when rescued, no information was gathered from animals that
were found already deceased even though the cause of death may have originated from
Rebekah Kohler
fishing gear. Results may have been proven more severe if information was gathered for a
broader range of animal species, if records from more rehabilitation centers were included,
and if records of already deceased animals were evaluated in the study.
Rebekah Kohler
Bibliography
Dau, Brynie K., Kirsten V. K. Gilardi, Frances M. Gulland, Ali Higgins, Jay B. Holcomb, Judy
St. Leger, and Michael H. Ziccardi. "Fishing Gear-Related Injury In California Marine
Wildlife." Journal of Wildlife Diseases 45.2 (2009): 355-62. Web.
http://www.jwildlifedis.org/