Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning
2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch
\f4 \lang9 \langnp9 (One of the requirements of the court to render adjudicatio
n/judicil review is that the case must have an actual controversy and not a}{\b1
\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 moot and acade
mic one}{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 ) Ito p
o yung nature ng case. }{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9
\langnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \
widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbc
h \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\b1 \fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f
4 \lang9 \langnp9 Facts:}{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9
\langnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1
\widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \db
ch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \
lang9 \langnp9 \tab }{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \la
ngnp9 Respondents were members of the board of directors of Doefil Agrarian Refo
rm Cooperativ Inc. (DARBCI). They were elected into office on july 12, 1998 and
their term should have ended on july 12, 2000. However, they occupyt their posit
ions in a holdover capacity until the controversey in the case arose.}{\fs22 \ke
rning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \l
i0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjus
tright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs2
2 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \tab }{\fs22 \kernin
g2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 On, Nov. 23 2005, the respo's
instituted a civil case at Branch 39, Polomolok, South Cotabato to enjoin petit
ioners from holding a special Generl Assemby (GA) and an election of new set of
officers. The Respo's alleged that the process by which the GA has been called w
s not in accordance with Sec. 35 of RA 6938, otherwise known as the Coopertive C
ode of the Phil.}{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp
9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlp
ar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2
\hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \l
angnp9 \tab }{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 On
November 24, the RTC issued a 72 hours Temporary Restraining Order (TRO). Despi
te the TRO, but without the petioners participation, the members went through wi
th the GA on Nov. 26, 2005 and elected Petitioners as new members of board.}{\fs
22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard \plain
\qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum
\adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0
{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 RTC: On Dec. 8
, 2005 the RTC finding the provisional remedy of preliminary injuction to be moo
t, issued a resolution denying respondents prayer for the issuance of writ of p
reliminary injuction and quashing the TRO previously issued.}{\fs22 \kerning2 \d
bch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \
lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright \l
in0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs22 \kernin
g2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 " The GA Meeting and the Elec
tion of Officers by the overriding these averments insignificant. Resultanly, no
delict or wrong can be imputed to the latter owing to said factos which were du
ly established during the hearings found by the Honorble Court.}{\fs22 \kerning2
\dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri
0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright
\lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs22 \ker
ning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 The Respondents filed a pe
tition on for certiorari with the Courts of Appeals. They contended that the tri
al court committed grave abuse of discretion when it considered the evidence ddu
ced in the hearing for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injuction. The CA r
endered the assailed decision which REMANDED the cse to the RTC for further proc
eedings.}{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }
\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspa
lpha \aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \a
f0 \loch \af0 {\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 P
etitioners moved for reconsideration, but this motion ws subsequently denied.}{\
fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard \plai
n \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnu
m \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \a
f0 {\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 Pet. on July
, 28 2009 informed the SC that two more GA had been held. During 20, 2008 meeti
ng, the GA ratified the Amended articles of coopertion and amended By-Laws of th
e cooperative. As stated in the ammendment: }{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich
\af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \l
isa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap
0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \
hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \tab }{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4
\loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 "The incumbent members of the Board of Directors and
various committees who were elected into office during the November 25, 2005 spe
cial elections shall continue to serve the cooperative until their successors ha
ve been elected and qualified into office. They shall be deemed to have served f
or one term only"}{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langn
p9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctl
par \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2
\hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\b1 \fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lan
g9 \langnp9 Issue:}{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \lang
np9 WON or not the court could exercise its power of adjudication?}{\fs22 \kern
ing2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0
\ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustr
ight \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\b1 \f
s22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 Held:}{\fs22 \kern
ing2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0
\ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustr
ight \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs22
\kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 For a court to exercis
e its power of adjudication, there must be an actual case or controversy one whi
ch involves a conflict of legal rights, an assertion of opposite legal claims su
sceptible of judicial resolution; the case must not be moot or academic or based
on extra-legal or other similar considerations not cognizable by a court of jus
tice. A case becomes moot and academic when its purpose has become stale, such a
s the case before us.}{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \l
angnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \wi
dctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch
\af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lan
g9 \langnp9 It is clear from the Omnibus Order of the RTC that it dismissed the
Amended Complaint because the supervening events had rendered the case moot thro
ugh the voluntary act of the GA as the highest policy-making body of the coopera
tive to declare the contested positions vacant and to elect a new set of officer
s. As a consequence, respondents no longer had the personality or the cause of a
ction to maintain the case against petitioners herein. Thus, the RTC committed n
o error when it dismissed the case.}{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch
\f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl27
6 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \k
erning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4
\loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard \plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0
\sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha \aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs
21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \loch \af0 {\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich
\af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the Petition
is hereby GRANTED. The assailed Court of Appeals Decision in CA-G.R. SP No. 018
51 dated 6 August 2008 and the Resolution dated 14 October 2008 are hereby REVER
SED and SET ASIDE. The Order dated 21 November 2006 issued by Branch 39 of the R
egional Trial Court of Polomolok, South Cotabato is hereby AFFIRMED and REINSTAT
ED.}{\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }\pard
\plain \qj \li0 \ri0 \lisb0 \sa200 \lisa0 \sl276 \slmult1 \widctlpar \aspalpha
\aspnum \adjustright \lin0 \rin0 \itap0 \fs21 \kerning2 \dbch \af2 \hich \af0 \l
och \af0 {\fs22 \kerning2 \dbch \af4 \hich \af4 \loch \f4 \lang9 \langnp9 \par }
}