Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Notes from the course presented by the authors at the African Institute for Mathematical
Sciences, November 2004.
1. Introduction to fields
What are we going to do in this section? In this section we will start by studying the gravitational force exerted by the earth on a particle. This allows us to introduce the concept
of a field, which will play an important role in our study of electricity and magnetism.
Before we study electricity and magnetism, we are going to spend some time discussing
gravity. We do this because we are much more familiar with gravity from our everyday lives
and because a lot of what we learn from gravity is directly applicable to electromagnetism.
One of the questions which we are often interested in, is determining the trajectory
that a particle will follow through space. At any instant in time, we specify the position
of our particle by three numbers (x(t), y(t), z(t)). These three numbers taken together are
the position vector of the particle. If we introduce three unit vectors i (directed along the
positive x axis), j (directed along the positive y axis) and k (directed along the positive z
axis), we can write
d ~x
F~ = m~a = m 2 .
dt
where
F~ = Fxi + Fy j + Fz k.
I can write this one vector equation as three ordinary differential equations for the three
coordinates of our particle,
m
d2 x
= Fx ,
dt2
d2 y
= Fy ,
dt2
d2 z
= Fz .
dt2
The initial conditions for solving these three ordinary differential equations are given by
the initial position and initial velocity of our particles.
So, what forces act on our particle? Well, close to the surface of the earth, we would
measure that our particle accelerates at about 9.8ms2 . If we moved from the surface of
the earth, say on a rocket destined for the moon, and repeated our measurements, wed find
that the magnitude of the acceleration of our particle would become smaller and smaller
the further we were from the earth. At each different position in space, depending on how
far we are from the earth, we measure a different acceleration for our particle. This implies
that at each different position in space, the magnitude of the force acting on our particle
changes. In fact, the time at which we make our measurements also plays a role. Indeed,
other massive objects (like for example the moon) will also exert a force on our particle.
The magnitude and direction of the force exerted by the moon on our particle will depend
on the position of the moon with respect to our particle. The position of the moon with
respect to our particle is time dependent.
The new idea here is that of a field. When we talk about a field in mathematical
physics, we are talking about a quantity that has a value at each location in space and at
each instant in time. It may have a vector value (like the force exerted by the earth in the
above example) or it may be a number (like the temperature T (~x, t) at each point in this
room at each instant in time).
This discussion suggests that instead of saying that the earth exerts a force on a falling
object, it is more useful to say that the earth sets up a gravitational force field. Any object
near the earth is acted upon by the gravitational force field at that location.
Did you get it? If you know what a field is, you got the point of this section.
|~a| =
~|
|F
m
2
61024
1
3
1024 ms2 .
This is a small acceleration and hence our approximation will be very accurate.
Did you get it? If you understand that F~ = m~g (i) assumes that we can split the system
into a source which produces the field and an object which reacts to the field, (ii) that this
split saves a huge amount of work and that (iii) this is not exact, but it is an extremely
good approximation (for the example we studied), then you have got the point of this
section.
1 |q1 q2 |
.
40 r2
This is a complete specification of the force, since we have given both its magnitude and
its direction. The number
you could get the units of
1
40
1
40
force field. We could, for example, draw the force field felt by q1 due to interaction with
q2 and also the electric field set up by q2 . The rules for our graphical representation are
1. the tail of the arrow is at the location where the force is felt;
~
2. the direction of the arrow shows the direction of F~ (or E);
~
3. the length of the arrow shows the magnitude |F~ | (or |E|).
As an example, we plot the electric field for a positive point charge and a negative point
charge below.
1
r2
dependence, it does not matter how far apart the electrons are when we
Did you get it? If you can work out the electric field due to a collection of point charges
using only the formula for the electric field set up by a single point charge and the superposition principle, you have understood this section.
7. Electric Dipoles
What are we going to do in this section? In this section the electric field of an electric
dipole is studied.
Two equal but opposite charges separated by a distance s are called an electric dipole.
The figure below shows an example of an electric dipole. We are interested in computing
the value of the electric field at point A, which lies on the axis the dipole.
q +q
11
00
00
11
A
111
00000
11
00
11
1
0
s0000000000000000000
r
1111111111111111111
Fig. 3: The two charges in the electric dipole are separated by a distance
s. The point A is a distance r from the centre of the dipole.
Just by looking at the system we can get a good idea about the electric field at A. Since
the positive charge is closer to A it produces a larger electric field than the negative charge.
The electric field due to the positive charge at A points away from the dipole; the electric
field from the negative charge at A points towards the dipole. When we sum the two well
get a much smaller electric field at A, pointing away from the dipole. You may be surprised
that the dipole which has total charge zero is able to produce an electric field at point A.
There is a non-zero electric field only because the two charges dont sit at the same point.
The electric field due to q is (i is a unit vector pointing from the negative charge to the
positive charge)
~q =
E
1
q
i.
40 r s 2
2
1
2qsr
2
i.
s 2
s
40 r +
r 2
2
Does this result make sense? Two things which we can check immediately are the direction
of the field and the dimensions of the answer. The electric field is in the i direction, that
is, away from the dipole. This agrees with our discussion above. Are the dimensions of the
1
40 by a
1
40 in our
charge divided
above formula
s 2
r
r2 .
2
1 2qs
i.
40 r3
Note that the field of a dipole has a different r dependence to the field for a point charge.
We can write this electric field as
~A =
E
1 2qs
1 2~
p
i=
,
3
40 r
40 r3
where p~ = qsi. We call p~ the dipole moment. Along the axis of the dipole, the field of
the dipole is parallel to the dipole moment. The dipole moment and electric field are not
parallel in general. Far from the dipole, the dipole moment is the only quantity you need
to determine to completely specify the field of the dipole. p~ is the product of the charge
q with the vector si which stretches from the position of the negative point charge to the
position of the positive point charge.
Here is another example that you can work through: imagine that we want to compute
the electric field of the dipole at the position B as shown in the figure. You need to work
out the field due to the positive and negative charges at point B and sum them to get the
10B
11 11
00
00+q
00 11
11
00
Fig. 4: The two charges in the electric dipole are separated by a distance
s. The point B is a distance r from the centre of the dipole.
total electric field. With some work you should be able to convince yourself that the field
of the positive charge at B is
~q =
E
2s i + rj
1
q
q
2 ,
40 r2 + s 2
r2 + 2s
2
the field of the negative charge at B is (j points from the centre of the dipole towards B)
~ q =
E
2s i rj
1
q
q
s 2 ,
40 r2 + s 2
2
r + 2
2
Notice that this field has no j component. Can you understand this in a simple way? You
should again convince yourself that when r >> s, this field is completely specified by the
dipole moment p~.
Did you get it? If you can compute the field of the dipole at any point in space and
understand the behaviour of the dipole field in the limit that you are very far from the
dipole (compared to the distance between the two charges in the dipole), then you have
understood this section.
8. Matter
What are we going to do in this section? Matter is made from building blocks which are
charged. In this section we will review what these building blocks are. we are doing this
because wed like to use what we have learnt about the interaction between charges to
understand the properties of matter.
All matter is made up of atoms. An atom consists of a positively charged nucleus
surrounded by a negatively charged electron cloud. The nucleus itself consists of positively
charged protons and electrically neutral neutrons. A single atom has a radius of about
1010 m. This implies that it has a volume of about r3 = 1030 m3 . Consequently in
a 1cm3 =106 m3 cube of a metal lattice, there are about 1024 atoms. The nucleus of the
atom is about 1015 m, that is, about 100 000 times smaller than the atom itself. Most of
the mass of the atom is concentrated in the nucleus; indeed, the proton and neutron have
roughly the same mass and the proton is about 2000 times more massive than the electron.
The charge of an electron is 1.6 1019 C; the charge of a proton is 1.6 1019 C.
Atoms have the same number of electrons and protons and hence are electrically
neutral. However, it is possible for an atom to become an ion when it accepts or donates
electrons. A sodium ion for example has 11 protons and 10 electrons. As a result, it has
a net charge of 1.6 1019 C. We can often model ions as point charges.
It is also possible that atoms bind to form molecules. For example a hydrogen atom can
bind with a chlorine atom to form a HCl molecule. The hydrogen atom in the molecule
is slightly positive; the chlorine atom is slightly negative. Thus, the hydrogen chloride
molecule can be modelled as a dipole.
Did you get it? What you should get out of this section is an appreciation that matter is
built out of components which interact electrically.
our dipole is built from charges with a charge of 1.6 1019 C, we find that the charges
are separated by a distance
s=
31034
1.61019
2 1015 m.
This is about the size of an atomic nucleus - a very tiny shift of the electron cloud.
To compute the force that a neutral atom exerts on a point charge, we need to compute
the strength of the electric field of the dipole at the location of the point charge.
+ _
~q| =
|~
p| = |E
1 q
.
40 r2
2
1
2q
~ dipole | =
|E
.
40
r5
Thus, the force exerted by the neutral atom on the point charge is
~ dipole | =
q|E
The
1
r5
1
40
2q 2
.
r5
1
r3
1
r2
Did you get it? If you have an understanding of why the force the neutral atom exerts on
the point charge depends on r as r5 , you have understood this section.
10. Insulators
What are we going to do in this section? In this section we will study materials which are
made up of molecules with tightly bound electrons. We are interested in understanding
how these materials respond to an electric field.
We will now study materials which are made up of molecules with tightly bound
electrons. Since all electrons are firmly bound to the atoms/molecules making up the material (most charged particles move much less that 1010 m) these materials can electrically
insulate one charged object from another.
If we expose our insulator to an external electric field, the electric field will cause all
of the (normally unpolarised) atoms in the insulator to polarise. In any given molecule,
the electrons didnt move very far at all. In addition, the molecules within the material
are also not free to move. Thus, no single charged particle moved very far at all. The
net effect however can be big because there are so many molecules in the insulator to be
~ field that is polarising them. Thus,
affected. The polarised molecules align with the E
even at equilibrium, there can be a non-zero electric field inside the insulator.
+
+
+
+
11. Conductors
What are we going to do in this section? In this section we will study materials which
do have mobile charge carriers. We are interested in understanding how these materials
respond to an electric field.
An example of a conductor is a metal. Metals are good conductors. In this case, the
mobile charge carriers are electrons. The atoms in a solid piece of metal are arranged in a
regular three dimensional geometry, a lattice. The inner electrons of each atom are tightly
bound to the nucleus; some of the outer electrons of each atom participate in chemical
bonds and about one electron per atom join a sea of mobile electrons which are free to
move throughout the entire macroscopic piece of metal. These mobile electrons look a lot
like an ideal gas. In fact, some simple models treat the mobile electron sea as an ideal gas.
How does a conductor respond to an external electric field? The external electric field
exerts a force on the mobile electrons. Electrons move in response to these forces and a
net charge starts to build up on the edges of the conductor. A good way to think about
this is that the electron sea shifts with the result that we have excess electrons building
up on one side of the conductor making it negatively charged and a deficiency of electrons
on the other side of the conductor leaving it with a net positive charge. Denoting only the
excesses of charge, we have the situation shown below.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ +
excess charge will build up. Actually, there will always be some electron motion. When
we say that the electrons have stopped moving, we are really talking about the average
electron motion.
We will prove that once the system reaches static equilibrium, the excess charge build
up exactly cancels the applied external field. Well do the proof by contradiction - that is
well make an assumption and show that the consequences of this assumption are incorrect.
This shows that our assumption must have been incorrect. Imagine that the system has
reached static equilibrium and assume that the net electric field inside the conductor is
non-zero. If the net electric field inside the conductor is non-zero, the electrons inside the
conductor will feel a non-zero force. Since they are free to move, this implies that they
will accelerate. But this contradicts our starting point - the system has reached static
equilibrium so that electrons are not moving. Thus, our assumption that the net electric
field inside the conductor is non-zero when the conductor has reached static equilibrium
must have been false.
The net electric field inside a conductor which has reached static equilibrium is zero.
Another question we could ask is where any excess charge is located. Imagine for
example that we have an excess of electrons in the conductor. Since the charge in a
conductor is free to move, the excess electrons will repel each other and move away from
each other. In the final equilibrium configuration the electrons will be as far as possible
from each other. This occurs when the excess charge distributes itself uniformly on the
surface of the conductor.
Did you get it? If you know what a conductor is and how it responds to an electric field,
then you understood this section. This includes knowing what the electric field inside a
conductor at equilibrium is, understanding how the conductor polarises and where excess
charge in the conductor is located.
Recall the experiment we did in class: we stuck a first piece of sticky tape to the table.
We then stuck a second piece of tape onto the first piece and ripped the second piece off.
We then did exactly the same thing with a third tape. It turned out that the second and
third tapes repelled each other. From this we can infer that they are charged. The charge
on the tape is a result of one tape pulling electrons off of the other tape. One thing we
can try to calculate, is the fraction of atoms that lost one of their electrons.
Our calculation is set up like this: (i) first, estimate the force of repulsion between the
two tapes; (ii) from this force of repulsion we can determine the charge on each tape; (iii)
from this charge we know how many electrons are on each tape and hence what fraction
of atoms lost an electron. Something else that you should keep in mind is that we are not
trying to do an exact calculation. We are just trying to get some sort of an idea about
how large the charge on each tape is. Well be happy if our answer is good to a factor of
10!
Consider the case that the two tapes that are repelling each other have come to
rest. There are three forces acting on each tape: an electrical repulsion (well denote the
magnitude of this force by Fe ), the force due to gravity (with magnitude given by mg)
and the force that your hand exerts on the tape (with magnitude given by T ). Consult
the figure below.
Fe
mg
Fig. 8: One of the two tapes which were repelling each other.
Since the tape is not accelerating, the forces acting on it must sum to zero. This gives us
two equations
T cos = mg,
T sin = Fe .
We can estimate mg and ; we want to know Fe . Dividing the two equations eliminates T
- the quantity that we are not interested in (in the next equation we use the fact that is
small)
Fe = tan mg mg.
Combining this with Coulombs Law we have (this is an approximation - all of the point
charges on the two tapes are not the same distance r from each other)
Fe =
1 q2
= mg.
40 r2
40 r2 mg.
The quantity we could compute was q 2 . We cant tell if the tape has extra electrons (giving
it a net negative charge) or if it is missing electrons (giving it a net positive charge).
Now, lets estimate q. First,
1
40
2
The deflection of the tape was roughly 0.1 radians. Finally, g is about 10 ms2 . Thus,
p
q 1010 (5 102 )2 104 10 0.1 = 5 109 C.
One electron has a charge of 1.6 1019 C, so that this charge translates into about
n=
5 109
3 1010
1.6 1019
electrons.
Next we need to estimate how many atoms there are in our tape. Lets imagine that
the portion of our tape that is charged has a width of about 1 cm and a length of about
3 cm. This translate into an area of about 3 104 m2 . Each atom has a radius of about
1010 m and hence an area of about r2 = 1020 m2 . Thus, on the charged portion of the
tape there are about
3 104
= 3 1016
1020
atoms. The fraction of atoms f that lost (or gained, we dont know) an electron is
N=
n
= 106 ,
N
so that roughly one atom in a million will lose an electron.
f=
Did you get it? In this section we applied the physics we have developed so far to
study a real problem. If you understand how the quantities in the real problem are related
to the quantities appearing in the formulas we have developed, you have understood the
point of this section.
Q
.
A
If our plates really were infinite, both q and A would be infinite, but the ratio would
be finite. The units of is coulombs per meter squared. The result that we will use now
and prove later says that the electric fields between the plates takes a constant value for
all points between the two plates. This value is equal to
~ =
|E|
.
0
You should check that the dimensions on both sides of this formula match.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
|Q|
A0 ,
excess charge that builds up on the surface of the needle. This field must exactly cancel
the electric field of the cup, so that (again this is an approximation - we are assuming that
all charges on the cup are the same distance from the needle of the electroscope)
~ =
|E|
1 |q|
|Q|
=
.
40 r2
A0
(13.1)
In this formula, q is the net charge on the cup and r is the distance from the cup to the
needle.
We now want to calculate the force that the cup exerts on the needle. We can equally
compute the force that the needle exerts on the cup, because according to Newtons third
law, these forces are equal and opposite. To compute the force that the cup exerts on
the needle, we need an expression for the field set up by the dipole at the location of the
cup. Since the distance from the cup to the dipole is much larger than the thickness of the
dipole, we can use the following approximation for the field of the dipole
~ =
|E|
1 2|~
p|
1 2|Q|t
=
.
3
40 r
40 r3
needle
+
+
Q +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Fig. 10: The polarised needle of the electroscope and the charged cup are
shown. In this figure the thickness of the needle (t) and the distance from
the needle to the dipole (r) are given. The figure is exaggerated; in reality, t
is much much smaller than r. The face of the needle (which has an area A)
is not visible because we have a side view of the needle.
In this last formula, t is the thickness of the needle, Q is the excess charge on the surface
of the needle and r is the distance from the needle to the cup. Multiplying this by the
charge q of the cup and using (13.1) to obtain an expression for Q, we find
F =
1 2Aq 2 t
,
40 4r5
for the magnitude of force exerted by the needle on the cup. This is of course equal to the
force that the cup exerts on the needle. Following the argument we gave for the tapes we
obtain F = mg. Consequently
F = mg =
1 2Aq 2 t
.
40 4r5
mg(40 )4r5
.
2At
We can now estimate q. m is about 1g=103 kg, g is about 10ms2 and is about 0.1
radians so that mg 103 . r is about centimetres so that r5 1010 m5 . The area of
the needle is of the order of cm2 =104 m2 and the thickness of the needle is of the order
3
of mm=10
q m. Also, 4 10. Consequently
3 1010 101010
q 10 10
3 108 C.
4 103
This corresponds to
n=
3 108
2 1011
1.6 1019
electrons. We again want to calculate the fraction of atoms that gained or lost an electron.
The area of our cup is roughly 4cm5cm=20cm2 = 2 103 m2 . Again, the radius of an
atom is roughly 1010 m so that the area of a single atom is about 1020 m2 . Thus, the
number of electrons in the surface of the cup is roughly
N
2 103
= 2 1017 .
1020
2 1011
= 106 ,
17
2 10
which agrees with the answer we obtained in the previous section. (Because our calculations
are so rough, even if we had obtained f = 105 or f = 107 , we would still claim to have
agreement.)
When the needle of the electroscope polarises, the electron sea shifts relative to the
regular lattice of metal ions in the needle. By how much does the sea shift? This is the last
number we will calculate. If the electron sea shifts by a distance d, the volume of excess
charge will be Ad where A is the area of the face of the needle. Since we have roughly
n = 1030 atoms per meter cubed, we will have a total of nAd = 1030 Ad excess electrons
corresponding to an excess charge of Q = nAde = 1030 Ad 1.6 1019 C, where e is the
charge of one electron. Thus, the charge density is
=
nAde
= nde = 1, 6 1011 d.
A
= 3 105 .
A
4 r2
10 104
Thus, d 0.2 1015 m - that is the electron sea shifts by a fraction of the radius of the
=
nucleus!
Did you get it? In this section we again studied a real problem. If you can connect the
symbols in the various formulas with the quantities in the real problem and understand
why (for example) the needle is attracted by the charged cup, you have understood this
section.
Fig. 11: The expected electric field close to a positively charged rod.
Now that we have some idea of what we expect, lets try to compute things more
explicitly. Consider a slice of the rod as shown in the figure below. We will be computing
the electric field at the observation point shown, set up by this slice. To compute the
magnitude of the electric field, we will need the distance from dq to the observation point.
From the sketch below, we see that this distance is
r=
x2o + (y yo )2 .
dq
dy
yyo
r
y
xo
yo
dE
Fig. 12: The electric field due to a small slice of the charged rod is shown.
The midpoint of the rod lies at x = y = 0.
1
dq
.
2
40 xo + (y yo )2
To get the direction of the electric field, we need the unit vector r in the direction of the
vector ~r shown below. First, we compute ~r (look at the figure to get this)
~r = (xo , yo y, 0).
The unit vector is thus
(xo , yo y, 0)
r = p
.
x2o + (y yo )2
The electric field now becomes
~ =
dE
1
dq
(xo , yo y, 0).
2
40 (xo + (y yo )2 ) 23
Finally, we want to express the charge dq in terms of the length of the slice dy. We can
do this by multiplying the length of our slice by the charge density
dq =
Q
dy.
L
Q 1
1
(xo , yo y, 0)dy.
2
L 40 (xo + (y yo )2 ) 32
The total electric field is now obtained by integrating over the length of the rod
Z
~ =
E
L
2
L
2
1
Q 1
(xo , yo y, 0)dy.
2
L 40 (xo + (y y0 )2 ) 32
This is a tough integral to do analytically. You could of course do it numerically and hence
obtain an expression for the electric field at any location you wanted. As we mentioned
above, when yo = 0, we expect that the y component of the field vanishes. For this special
point, we can perform the above integral analytically. The only non-zero component of
the electric field is
Z
Ex =
L
2
L
2
Q
xo dy
40 L (x2o + y 2 ) 32
L2
1 Qxo
y
40 L x2o x2o + y 2 L2
1 Qxo
40 L
q
x2o
x2o +
L 2 .
2
Did you get it? We studied the electric field set up by a continuous charge distribution. The
basic idea in this section was to break the continuous charge distribution into infinitesimal
segments, compute the electric field from each segment and then sum these electric fields
to obtain the electric field from the original charge distribution. Of course, this is another
application of the superposition principle.
~ dS
~ = Q.
E
0
S
To prove Gausss law we will use the superposition principle. Any charge distribution can
be built as a sum over point charges. The superposition principle tells us that we can
consider each of these point charges separately. Thus, if we prove the result for a single
point charge, the result for an arbitrary distribution of charge is also true.
As a warm up exercise, lets prove the result for a point charge and the special case
that S is a sphere of radius R. In this case the electric field is
~ =
E
e r
,
40 R2
with r a unit vector pointing in the radial direction. The outward normal to our tiny area
elements are also directed in the radial direction
~ = rdA = rR2 d,
dS
with d an infinitesimal solid angle. Thus,
Z
Z
e r
e
e
2
rR d =
d = .
2
40 R
40
0
R
In the above we used the fact that the integral d = 4.
~ dA
~=
E
After that simple warm up, we now consider an arbitrary surface S. If we consider an
~ will no longer point in the radial
arbitrary surface S, the infinitesimal area elements dS
~ with
direction r. In this case, the area of the element will be larger than an area dA
the same solid angle but oriented so that it points in the direction of r. We would like an
~ perp | in terms of |dA|.
~ Let the angle between the unit normal of dA
~ and
expression for |dA
~ = |dA
~ |. When =
r be . When the angle = 0, |dA|
~ | = 0.
surface and |dA
1111111
0000000
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
1111111
~ and dA
~
Fig. 13: The perpendicular area is shaded. The angle between dA
~ and the unit vector r is also .
is . The angle between the dA
~|
|dA
.
cos
1 e 2
e
R d =
d.
2
40 R
40
Thus,
Z
Z
~ dA
~=
E
e
e
d = .
40
0
This proves the formula for a point charge and an arbitrary surface S. Thus, as explained
above, by the superposition principle this proves the theorem in general.
Did you get it? The basic result is that if we integrate the outward normal component of
the electric field over a closed surface S, the integral is equal to the total charge enclosed
by S divided by 0 . If you understand this, then you got the point of this section.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Fig. 14: The field from an infinite uniformly charged plate. The surface
S is the cylinder shown. The two ends of the cylinder are the same distance
from the charged plate.
expect that the electric field set up by the plate will have a component parallel to the
plate. Thus, we might expect the field shown in the figure.
The next step in the calculation involves choosing the surface S. A convenient choice
is the cylinder shown. We can split the integral over S into two contributions - the
contribution coming from integrating along the length of the cylinder and the contribution
coming from integrating over the ends of the cylinder. First consider the contribution from
the integral over the length of the cylinder. The direction of the electric field is parallel
~ is normal to the sides of the cylinder.
to the sides of the cylinder. The direction of dS
~ dS
~ is zero. We see that the entire contribution to the integral comes
Consequently E
from the ends of the cylinder. Since the ends of the cylinder are at a fixed distance from
the charged plate, the strength of the electric field will be constant over the end of the
cylinder. The cylinder is placed so that the two ends of the cylinder are the same distance
~
from the charged plate. At both ends, the electric field is parallel to the area element dS.
Thus,
Z
Z
~ dA
~=
E
~ dA
~ = 2AE,
E
ends
where E is the magnitude of the electric field at the ends of the cylinder and A is the area
of the end of the cylinder. Gausss law now tells us that
2AE =
Q
.
0
Note that the area A of the end of the cylinder is also equal to the area of the plate that
is enclosed by S. Thus,
Q
A
E=
=
.
2A0
20
You should check that E has the correct units. This formula tells you that the magnitude
of the electric field is independent of your distance from the plates.
The result we used for the needle of our electroscope involved two infinite plates with
opposite charge. Using the superposition principle, we can get the total field by adding
the field from the positively charged plate to the field from the negatively charged plate.
The field from the positive plate is directed outwards from the plate. The field for the
negative plate is directed into the plate. Thus, in the region in between the two plates the
field of the positive plate and the negative plate sum to give twice the original field
E=
.
0
In the region outside the two plates the electric fields are opposite in direction and sum to
zero.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Fig. 15: Two infinite plates with opposite charge. The field in between the
two plates is constant 6= 0. The field outside of the two plates vanishes.
Did you get it? In this section we have obtained a concrete result - the electric field between
two uniformly charged infinite plates. We have also demonstrated that Gausss law can be
a powerful tool for obtaining the electric field from a continuous distribution of charge.
~
F
m
~v () = ~v (0) +
d~x
(0) = ~x(0) + ~v (0),
dt
d~v
(0) = ~v (0) + ~a(0) = ~v (0) + ~g .
dt
Thus, we now have the values of the position and velocity of our particle at time . Given
these values, we can compute (again we dropped terms of O(2 ))
~x(2) = ~x() +
d~x
() = ~x() + ~v (),
dt
~v (2) = ~v () +
d~v
() = ~v () + ~a() = ~v () + ~g .
dt
Thus, we now have the values of the position and velocity of our particle at time 2. Given
these values, we can compute the position and velocity of our particle at time 3, and after
that at 4, and on and on, until we eventually get to the point where the particle has come
to rest. Knowing the position of the particle at this point allows us to answer our initial
question.
What an ugly solution! We just want to know how high the particle goes - one number.
To get this we have computed the position and velocity of the ball at all points on the
balls trajectory. If we want to be accurate, we need to take to be small, so that we may
be computing thousands and thousands of numbers, and only use one of them. Surely we
can do better than this?
It is the work energy approach that will provide a better solution. The work energy
approach integrates Newtons second law from the initial point on the particles trajectory
to the final point. Since the result of the integral only depends on the endpoints of the
particles trajectory, we expect to get an equation which will directly relate the initial and
final velocities and positions of our particle. Start from Newtons second law
2
d ~x
F~ = m 2 .
dt
We are going to integrate this equation of motion along the trajectory of the particle.
We define the infinitesimal displacement d~x to be a small segment along the trajectory
of the particle. It has the same direction as the particles velocity; it has an infinitesimal
magnitude dx. Integrating we obtain
Z
~
xf
Z
F~ d~x = m
~
xi
We call
R ~xf
~
xi
~
xf
~
xi
d2 ~x
d~x = m
dt2
tf
ti
d2 ~x d~x
dt.
dt2 dt
F~ d~x the work done on the particle. If you take a look at the integrand of
the term on the right hand side of this last equation, it is of the form f df
dt =
term is thus easily integrated
Z
~
xf
~
xi
m
m
F~ d~x = ~v ~v (tf ) ~v ~v (ti ).
2
2
1 d 2
2 dt f .
This
We see that the right hand side is nothing but the change in kinetic energy of our particle.
What is the left hand side? To get some idea, lets plug in the known expression for our
force and explicitly evaluate the integral. The result is
Z
~
xf
F~ d~x = m~g
~
xi
~
xf
Lets imagine that the ball starts at ~xi = (0, 0, hi ) and lands up at ~xf = (0, 0, hf ). Since
the acceleration due to gravity is ~g = (0, 0, g) we have
m~g (~xi ~xf ) = mg(hi hf ).
This looks like the initial gravitational potential energy minus the final gravitational potential energy. Thus, we obtain
Z
~
xf
~
xi
m
m
F~ d~x = mg(hi hf ) = ~v ~v (tf ) ~v ~v (ti ).
2
2
m
~v ~v (ti ).
2
We easily solve this equation for hf - this answers our initial question. This time we have
obtained our answer by computing a single number - this is a much better approach to the
problem.
From this example we can extract the following general result
Z
~
xf
~
xi
m
m
F~ d~x = ~v ~v (tf ) ~v ~v (ti ) = K,
2
2
with K the change in kinetic energy of the particle. If in addition we deal with a
conservative force we also have
Z
~
xf
~
xi
with U (~x) the potential energy and U the change in potential energy. Since it is only
U that appears in this formula, it is only changes in potential energy that are defined.
This is not surprising because the potential is only defined up to a constant.
We call the sum of the kinetic energy and the potential energy the mechanical energy
of the particle. Notice that when only conservative forces act, the mechanical energy is
conserved
K + U = 0.
Did you get it? The most important result from this section is the relation between
potential energy and work done, and it is what we will use in later sections. It is also good
if you have some idea as to why the energy and work concepts can be more useful than
just using Newtons laws directly.
y
q2
q1
r
1 q1 q2
1 q1 q2
1 q1 q2
dx
=
.
=
2
40 x
40 x r
40 r
r
From the last section we know that
F~ d~x =
1 q1 q2
.
40 r
r
This formula for the potential energy between two charges is the main result of this section.
F~ d~x = U (r) U () = U (r) =
Lets explore this result a little. To get some insight into what potential energy means,
note that from the formula
Z
~
xf
~
xi
it follows that
U
U
U
,
Fy =
,
Fz =
.
x
y
z
This formula has a simple geometrical interpretation - the particle will feel a force that
Fx =
pushes it into a region of lower potential energy. As an example, lets consider the potential
energy for a pair of point charges which both have positive charge. We know that these
particles will repel each other and thus, the particles will move in such a way that their
separation increases. The plot of potential energy is shown below.
If the force acting is to decrease the potential energy, we see immediately from the above
plot that it must act in such a way that r is increased - i.e. we see that the two point
charges do indeed repel each other! We call this a repulsive potential.
For the case that q1 and q2 have opposite charges we can again compute the potential
energy. In this case, the potential energy is shown below.
1 q1 q2
1 q1 q3
1 q2 q3
+
+
.
40 r12
40 r13
40 r23
This formula for the potential energy of a collection of particles is not a new fact - it has
the same content as the superposition principle. To demonstrate this point, consider the
q3
r13
r23
q1
q2
r12
q1
q2
q3
x1
x2
x3
Fig. 20: The potential of these three charged particles is given as a sum
over contributions for each pair of particles.
case when all three particles lie on the x-axis. The particles have charges q1 , q2 and q3 ,
and positions x1 , x2 and x3 . Assume for simplicity that all three charges are positive.
Using the superposition principle, the force that particle three experiences is given by
F =
1
q1 q3
1
q2 q3
+
.
2
40 (x1 x3 )
40 (x2 x3 )2
q1 q2
1
q1 q3
1
q2 q3
1
+
+
.
40 x2 x1
40 x3 x1
40 x3 x2
U
,
x3
so that the formula for the electric field and the formula for the potential energy have the
same content.
Did you get it? You should be able to write down the electrical potential energy for a
pair of point charges and for a collection of point charges. You should also understand
the relationship between the potential energy of a particle and the force that acts on the
particle.
~
xf
~
xi
Ex =
,
x
Ey =
,
y
Ez =
.
z
1 q
40 r
volts.
0
1 q q
40 r
joules.
This is the correct result. Potentials add - just like potential energies. Thus, the potential
at point C in the figure is given by
C =
1 q2
1 q1
+
.
40 r1
40 r2
q2
r2
q1
r1
Fig. 21: The potential at point C is a sum of the potential from charge q1
and the potential from charge q2 .
To get some idea of how large potentials are, we could compute the potential at a
distance 1010 m from the proton. This will give us an idea of the potential of the electron
in a hydrogen atom. The result is
=
1 e
40 r
19
1010 1.610
1010
= 16 Volts.
This is a reasonable number to work with. The corresponding potential energy of the
electron
U = e 1.6 1019 16 2 1018 Joules
is so small that it is a lot less convenient. For this reason, it is often more useful to
work with a different unit of energy - the electron volt (eV). The electron volt is defined
by saying that if an electron moves through a potential difference of one volt, there is a
change in its electrical potential energy of
U = (e) 1 = 1.6 1019 Joules = 1 electron volt.
In the remainder of this section we will explore some of the consequences of the
equation
Z
~
xf
~
xi
From this formula, it follows that since the electric field inside a conductor at static equilibrium is zero, all points inside the conductor are at the same potential.
Consider a pair of uniformly charged infinite plates as shown below. For these plates,
the electric field within the plates is a constant. Thus, we can write
Z
~
xf
~
xi
Z
~ d~x = E
~
E
~
xf
~
xi
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Fig. 22: Two infinite plates with opposite charge. The field in between the
two plates is constant 6= 0. The field outside of the two plates vanishes.
As an example, if we are told that the potential difference () between two plates
of a capacitor is 6volts and the distance (s) between the plates of the capacitor is 3mm,
the electric field between the plates is
E=
6
3103
We mentioned previously that the zero of potential energy is arbitrary. The zero of the
electric potential is also arbitrary. To illustrate this point, consider the two capacitors
shown below.
35V
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
135V
75000V
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
0.2mm
Fig. 23:
plates.
75100V
0.2mm
Two capacitors with exactly the same electric field between their
These two capacitors have the same potential difference between their plates. Consequently, they both have an electric field of magnitude
E=
100
0.2103
= 5 105 Vm1 ,
between their plates. Clearly, what counts in computing the electric field is the potential
difference and not the value of the potential. You know a similar fact from your experience
with gravity: it is no harder to walk up from the 75th floor to the 76th floor than it is to
walk up from the first floor to the second floor.
Did you get it? If you can calculate the electrical potential for a point charge and a
collection of point charges, and you understand the relationship between electrical potential
and electric field, then you got the point of this section.
20. Currents
What are we going to do in this section? Up to now we have studied static charges and
we have seen that they produce electric fields. We will now start to study moving charges,
that is, currents. The reason we do this is because currents set up a magnetic field.
We now want to consider moving charges. Consider an electrical wire (which is a
conductor) of cross sectional area A. The charges moving in the wire are moving with a
speed v.
+ v
+ v
111
000
000
111
000
111
000
111
000
111
000
111
000
111
000
111
+ v
+ v
+ v
Fig. 24: Charges moving in a wire of cross sectional area A. The charges
move in the direction shown with a speed v.
When we have moving charges, the quantity we are interested in computing is the amount of
charge dQ flowing through the wire in a time dt. We call the ratio
dQ
dt
is measured in coulombs per second. We also call a coulomb per second an ampere.
In a time dt all of the charges in a volume Avdt will pass a given point on the wire.
Thus, if the charges that are moving are positive with charge q and have a density of n+
per m3 , the current is given by
n+ vdtAq
dQ
=
= n+ vAq.
dt
dt
A good way to picture what is happening is to think of the electrons moving through wire
as water moving in a pipe. Calculating the current is the same as calculating how much
water passes through the pipe in a given time.
There is an important point to note here. We have described things as if the mobile
charge carriers are positively charged. Of course, the mobile charge carriers are electrons
which are negatively charged. Consequently, the charged particles (electrons) are actually
flowing opposite to the direction shown for the current flow.
A simple situation that involves currents, involves connecting a bulb to a battery.
We measure resistance in ohms, usually denoted by the symbol . From Ohms law we
see that an ohm is a volt per ampere.
When we start to consider two (or more) bulbs our circuits become quite interesting.
Indeed, for the case of two bulbs we have two different ways in which we can make our
connections. We say that we can connect the bulbs in series or in parallel. The two
possibilities are shown below.
Fig. 26: Two bulbs connected in parallel. Note that the potential across
both bulbs is V0 .
Fig. 27: Two bulbs connected in series. Note that the potential across both
bulbs is V20 .
When you built these two different circuits, you checked to see how brightly the bulbs
glowed. The bulbs connected with the parallel connection glowed more brightly than the
bulbs connected in series. Why is this the case?
The energy lost by the charge carriers when they traverses the circuit is given by
Elost = qV
with V the potential difference across the battery and q is the amount of charge that
traverses the circuit. We can compute the rate at which this energy is lost, i.e. the power
supplied by the charge carriers as
dElost
dq
=
V = IV.
dt
dt
Power is measured in joules per second = watts. To figure out which bulb glows brightest,
we can compare the power delivered to each bulb. For the case of the bulbs in parallel,
each bulb has a potential difference of V0 across it, so that the current flowing in each bulb
is
I0 =
V0
.
R0
V0
.
2R0
Further, since the potential difference across both bulbs is V0 , the potential difference
across each bulb must be
V0
2 .
Thus, for bulbs connected in series, each bulb will glow with roughly one quarter of the
brightness that a single bulb connected across the battery would glow with.
Did you get it? You should understand what a current is. You should also understand how
current, potential and resistance are related. You should be able to use this knowledge to
look at electric circuits and predict how brightly bulbs would glow.
0 d~l r
I 2 ,
4
r
where d~l has magnitude dl and the same direction as the direction of current flow, r points
from the short segment d~l to the observation point, r is the distance from the short segment
to the observation point and
0
4
Did you get it? If you can compute the direction and magnitude of the magnetic field set
up by a current carrying wire, you have understood this section.
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
I
~ field in the loop shown is out of the page.
Fig. 30: The B
Your motor turned because the loop felt a force which tried to align the field produced by
your loop with the field of your magnet. The force law which will accomplish this is
~
dF~ = Id~l B,
where dF~ is the force felt be a small segment d~l of the loop, which is carrying a current I
~
in the presence of the background magnetic field B.
This is a lovely and simple formula - there are no awkward factors that you need to
remember. The reason for this is simply that this is the first equation that people wrote
down - it was this equation that was used to define the tesla.
0 d~l r
0
d~l r
I 2 =
n+ Aqv 2 .
4
r
4
r
This is the magnetic field from a collection of charge carriers. To get the magnetic field
~ we need to divide dB
~ by the number of
from a single charge (well denote this by B),
charge carriers (=n+ A|d~l|). Thus,
~
b
~ = 0 n+ Aqv dl r = 0 vq dl r ,
B
4 n+ A|d~l| r2
4
r2
b =
where dl
d~l
dl
is a unit vector. This unit vector points in the direction of the current, i.e.
b
in the direction of the velocity of the charges so that the velocity ~v is given by ~v = dlv.
This is the result we wanted: a point charge of charge q, moving with a velocity ~v sets up
~ given by
a magnetic field B
~ = 0 q ~v r ,
B
4 r2
where r is the distance from the point charge to the observation point and r points from
the charge to the observation point.
From your study on motors, you know that the Lorentz law for currents says a segment
~
of wire d~l which is carrying a current I in the presence of a background magnetic field B,
will experience a force
~
dF~ = Id~l B.
Following exactly the same procedure as we did above, we can also turn this law for currents
into a law for point charges. The result is
~
F~ = q~v B,
which is called the Lorentz force law for point charges. You should make sure that you
can derive this result.
This result is quite unusual. You are used to forces depending on positions, not on
velocities. You are also used to being able to derive the force as the gradient of a potential
- the Lorentz force can not be obtained as the gradient of some potential. Notice also
that the force acts perpendicular to both the external magnetic field and the velocity of
the particle. This has many observable consequences. One of these consequences is that
particles moving in a magnetic field move in circles.
Fig. 31: A charged particle moving in a magnetic field will move in a circle.
Convince yourself that the force is always directed towards of the centre of
the circle. Does this make sense?
q1
v1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
v2
q2
Fig. 32: The two point charges shown will interact both electrically and
magnetically.
What force does particle 2 feel as a result of this magnetic field? From the Lorentz
~ Convince yourself (again using the right hand
force law, we know that the force ~v B.
rule) that this force acts to the left of the page. This is the force exerted on particle 2 by
particle 1.
If we use Newtons second law, we would predict that particle 2 would exert a force on
particle 1 which would have the same magnitude as the force exerted by 1 on 2, but this
force would act to the right of the page. This cant possibly be true. Indeed, if we compute
the magnetic field set up by particle 2 at the location of particle 1, we need to compute
the cross product ~v2 r21 where r21 stretches from particle 2 to particle 1. Clearly, ~v2 and
r21 are parallel so that ~v2 r21 = 0. Thus, particle 2 does not set up a magnetic field at
the location of particle 1 and consequently, particle 2 does not exert a force on particle 1!
Newtons third law is not valid!
This is worrying - one of the consequences of Newtons third law is the conservation of
momentum. You may worry that if Newtons third law no longer holds, perhaps momentum
is no longer conserved. In fact, it turns out that momentum is still conserved, but the
analysis is subtle. You need to take into account the fact that some momentum is carried
away by the field itself!
Another thing which may be worrying you, is that if Newtons third law is wrong,
how come we thought it was true for so long? The only reasonable explanation is that the
terms which spoil Newtons third law (the magnetic forces) must be much smaller than the
terms which do satisfy the third law. This is indeed true. The magnitude of the electric
forces (which do satisfy Newtons third law) divided by the magnetic forces (which dont)
is
~
q
~
v
B
q2 q1 0 2 ~v2 (~v1 r)
2 2
|~v1 ||~v2 |
4r
= |~v1 ||~v2 |0 0 =
.
1 q1 q2 =
1 q1 q2
9 1016
40 r2
40 r2
Thus, the magnetic forces are much much smaller (in magnitude) than the electric forces.
You might notice that 9 1016 is equal to the value of the speed of light squared - this is
not a coincidence as we will see later.
25.1. The first two equations: Gausss law for electric and magnetic fields
~
The first of Maxwells equations is one we have seen before, Gausss Law for E:
Z
~ = q,
~ dS
E
0
S,closed
where q is the charge contained within the closed surface S.
As a simple example, we calculated the electric field due to a point charge. The electric
field is radial, and so the integral taken on a sphere of radius r centred on the charge is
2
~
just |E|.4r
. Equating this to the right hand side, one finds the usual Coulomb law. As
a second example, we used Gausss law to calculate the electric field of a charged sheet:
~ = /(20 ), where was the charge per unit area. (You should review
it was given by |E|
that calculation now, if you have forgotten it).
~
The second of Maxwells equations is Gausss Law for B:
Z
~ = 0.
~ dS
B
S,closed
What this equation says is that the net magnetic charge inside a closed surface S is always
zero. There are no magnetic point charges in nature. Instead, there are only magnetic
dipoles, made of a positive magnetic charge and a negative magnetic charge tied together
so they can never be separated. One example is a magnet, which always has a North pole
and a South pole. Even if you break a magnet in two, each piece will again have a North
pole and a South pole.
The earth itself is a giant magnet, and its field is illustrated in the diagram. The field
is used by migrating birds moving from one location to another when the seasons change.
The fact that we know the earths magnetic field allows us to determine the strength
of the magnetic field from other sources, by comparing with the earths magnetic field.
For example, a bar magnet behaves like a magnetic dipole. By analogy with an electric
dipole, we expect the magnetic field strength, at distances large compared to the size of
the magnet, to be proportional to 1/r3 where r is the distance from the magnet. In class,
we found using a compass that the magnetic field from a bar magnet became stronger
than the magnetic field from the earth at a distance of about 20 cm from the bar magnet.
Therefore the magnetic field of the magnet has a strength 2 105 Tesla at a distance
of 20 cm. Scaling the field with r3 , we can find the field at about 1 cm from the bar
magnet, the location of the nearest side of the coil in our electric motor. The magnetic
field strength in this location must be (203 ) 2 105 or approximately 0.16 Tesla.
S
N
Fig. 33: Earths magnetic field. Note that the earths magnetic South pole
is at the geographical north pole: it attracts the North pole of any magnet.
The strength of the earths magnetic field is about 2 105 Tesla. In Cape
Town, it points towards the North, slightly upwards (because we are near the
geographical south pole).
25.2. The third Maxwell equation: time-varying magnetic fields
The third of Maxwells equations is Faradays Law, which tells you how a changing
magnetic field causes an electric field. We wont derive this law rigorously, but will just
give an argument for how it works in a particular situation.
Imagine you have a uniform magnetic field, caused for example by a large flat magnet,
as shown in the diagram.
B
Fig. 34: A wire is moved across a uniform magnetic field, like cutting grass.
As the wire segment moves across the magnetic field, cutting across the field lines, the
~ where q is their charge and ~v is the
charge carriers in the wire feel a Lorentz force q~v B,
velocity of the wire across the field. Because of this force, we will get a current I flowing
into the paper. (Check that you understand this direction).
What we argue next is that we should see the same effect, i.e. a current flowing along
the wire in the direction pointing into the paper, when we hold the wire fixed, but move
the magnetic field across it, for example by moving a magnet causing the field:
v
B
Fig. 35: A magnetic field is moved across a wire.
In this situation, the charge carriers in the wire are not moving initially, as they
encounter the magnetic field: only the magnetic field is moving. Therefore it cannot be
the magnetic Lorentz force which is causing the current: there must be an electric field,
pointing along the wire and into the paper, produced by the changing magnetic field. From
equating the magnitude of the Lorentz force found in the first picture above, with the wire
moving, |F~ | = q|~v ||B|, to the electric force we infer must be present in the second picture,
~ we see that the motion of a magnetic field induces an electric field of strength
|F~ | = q|E|,
~ This is an example of Faradays law.
|~v ||B|.
The general form of Faradays law is:
Z
~ =d
~ dl
E
dt
C
~
~
B dS ,
S,open
where the closed curve C bounds the open surface S, as shown below.
C
dS
dl
Fig. 36: A closed curve C bounds a surface S. The normal direction to the
surface is conventionally defined as shown, using the right hand rule.
Z
~ = 0 I.
~ dl
B
C
I
C
Fig. 37: A current I passes through a closed curve C. Amperes law states
that the integral of the magnetic field around the contour C equals 0 I.
An example of the use of this equation is to calculate the magnetic field due to a
straight wire, carrying a current I. The magnetic field goes around the wire, in the
direction of the fingers of your right hand if your right thumb is pointing in the direction
of the current. If we take the contour C to be a circle of radius r centred on the wire, then
~ So Amperes law tells us that the strength
the left hand side of Amperes law is 2r|B|.
~ = 0 I/(2r).
of the magnetic field at a distance r from a wire carrying a current I is: |B|
Maxwell made a very clever observation about this example. He argued that if we
inserted a pair of parallel plates (called a capacitor) into the wire, as shown in the figure
below, then on a contour C taken around the wire at a large distance from it, one should
not notice the presence of the capacitor. Therefore the same result for the magnetic field
should be obtained for this case.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
C
Fig. 38: A pair of parallel plates is inserted into the wire carrying a current
I. The magnetic field is still integrated along the contour C.
Now, Maxwell realised there was a problem with Amperes law. Current is really the
amount of charge passing through a certain area per unit time. In Amperes law, this area
must be the area S bounded by the contour C. So far, so good. However, when you insert
the parallel plates, there are two ways of drawing the surface S. In the first, we take the
surface S to cut across the wire, for example on the right hand side of the parallel plates.
S
I
C
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Fig. 39: The surface S is drawn passing through the wire. Amperes law
gives the correct magnetic field for this case.
In the second case, we take the surface S to pass between the plates of the capacitor
and hence avoid the wire completely.
S
I
C
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Fig. 40: The surface S passes between the plates of the capacitor, so that
no current flows through it.
For this second case, the current passing through S is zero, because the electric charge
is simply building up on the two plates. So, the right hand side of Amperes law would
give zero, which is the wrong result.
Maxwell realised how to fix Amperes law. The point is that the electric field inside
the two plates is directed across the gap between them, and its magnitude is given by
~ = Q/(0 A) where A is the area of the plates and Q is the magnitude of the charge
|E|
on each of them. The current I is the amount of charge passing along the wire, per
~ we can write this as
unit time, so I = dQ/dt. Using the relation between Q and E,
~
~
I = 0 A(d|E|/dt).
Maxwell realised that we can add a term involving d|E|/dt
to the right
hand side of Amperes law. If our surface S passes outside the parallel plates, the electric
field is zero there, so this new term is zero and the equation gives the correct magnetic
field. If our surface S passes between the plates, I will be zero but our new term will be
nonzero. If we choose the coefficient of the new term correctly, it will exactly compensate
for the missing current I.
By analogy with Faradays law, it is natural to add a term involving the integral of
~
dE/dt
through a surface S:
Z
~ = 0 I + d
~ dl
B
dt
C
~
~
E dS ,
S,open
d
~
~ dS
E
is
with some constant we have to determine. In our example, dt
S,open
~
A(d|E|/dt),
which we want to be equal to I/0 . Therefore if we choose the constant
to equal 0 0 , the second term in our new, corrected Amperes law will give 0 I, even
though there is no current passing through the surface S. In effect, the time-varying
electric field across S is compensating for the absence of the current.
The corrected equation is known as the Ampere-Maxwell law:
Z
Z
d
~
~
~
~
B dl = 0 I + 0 0
E dS .
dt
C
S,open
This derivation has been long and subtle, but the result is well worth it because the last
term involving the time derivative of the electric flux through S is crucial to understanding
light.
25.4. Summary: Maxwells equations
Maxwells equations may now be written down together:
~
1. Gausss Law for E:
Z
~ = q.
~ dS
E
0
S,closed
~
2. Gausss Law for B:
Z
~ = 0.
~ dS
B
S,closed
~ =d
~ dl
E
dt
C
~ .
~ dS
B
S,open
~ = 0 I + 0 0 d
~ dl
B
dt
C
~ .
~ dS
E
S,open
These four equations are very, very powerful. They are one of the high points of
theoretical physics.
This is a good moment to summarise what we have learned so far in this course. We
started from electric charges, and learned how they produce electric fields. Then we turned
to electric currents, and how they produce magnetic fields. Then we started to connect the
two - arguing that moving (or time-varying) magnetic fields should produce electric fields
(Faradays law), and finally we have just argued that time-varying electric fields should
produce magnetic fields (Ampere-Maxwell law).
What is the next step? Having built up the great edifice of Maxwells equations, we
now apply it to a new and simpler situation. Imagine there are no electric charges, and
no currents, at all. Maxwells first and second equations tell us that the total electric
and magnetic flux through any surface S must be zero, but they dont force the electric
and magnetic fields to be zero. Faradays law associates an electric field to a time-varying
magnetic field, and the Ampere-Maxwell law associates a magnetic field to a time-varying
electric field. Thus we are tempted to imagine a situation where the electric and magnetic
fields sustain each other, even though there are no charges and currents. As we shall see
in the next lecture, that is how light works.
Z
~ dS
~=
E
S
~ EdV.
~
In the above formula, V is a volume bounded by the closed surface S. Thus, the right hand
side of the above equation involves a volume integral; the left hand side involves a surface
integral. The operator
~ =
,
,
x y z
x
y
z
The second result we want to use is Stokes theorem, which states that
Z
Z
~ d~l =
E
~ E)
~ dS.
~
(
S
On the right hand side of this equation we are integrating over the surface S which is
bounded by the contour C; on the left hand side we have a line integral over C. We now
turn to Maxwells equations.
We can write (S is a closed surface)
Z
~ dS
~= q,
E
0
S
q
~ EdV
~
= .
0
V
Further, we can write the charge q as the integral of the charge density () over the volume
Z
Z
~ EdV
~
dV.
0
This equation has to be true when integrated over any volume V. This can only be true if
the integrands on the two side of this equation are equal. Thus,
~ E
~ = .
This is the differential form of the first of Maxwells equations. Following an exactly
analogous procedure, you should show that the second of Maxwells equations become
~ B
~ = 0.
~ d~l = d
E
dt
C
~
~
B dS .
Recall that the curve C is the boundary of the open surface S. Using Stokes theorem to
rewrite the left hand side, we find
Z
~ E)
~ dS
~=d
(
dt
S
~ dS
~ .
B
Once again, because the above equation is true if we integrate over any surface S, we can
write this as the differential equation
~
~ E
~ = B .
t
This is the differential form of Maxwells third equation. Following exactly the same
procedure, you should be able to convince yourself that the fourth of Maxwells equations
can be written as
~
~ B
~ = 0 J~ + 0 0 E .
t
To get this you will need to define the density of current flowing through the surface S
defined by
Z
~
J~ dS.
I=
S
~
What are the units of the current density J?
Did you get it? If you can pass from the integral versions of Maxwells equations to the
differential versions of Maxwells equations, you got the point of this section.
Z
~ dS
~=0=
E
~ dS,
~
B
Z
d
d
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
E dl =
B dS ,
B dl = +0 0
E dS .
dt
dt
C
S
C
S
These are the equations we want to solve. How are we going to solve them? This is
Z
a rather non-trivial task. We wont follow a systematic procedure, but rather, well try
to guess a decent solution. We could look for solutions with just a non-zero magnetic
field, but a zero electric field. After some work wed find that there is no solution. We
might then look for a solution with a non-zero electric field and zero magnetic field. With
more work wed find there is still no solution. The next simplest thing is to have at least
one component of the electric and magnetic field to be non-zero.There are a huge number
of possibilities - we can choose which components we keep non-zero and also how these
non-zero components depend on t, x, y and z. It turns out that a good guess is to take
~ = (0, Ey (t, x), 0)
E
With this guess, the electric field is perpendicular to the magnetic field.
y
E
x
Fig. 41: In our guess for the solution of Maxwells equations, the electric
and magnetic fields are perpendicular.
How do we check if this guess is correct and further, determine exactly how Ey (t, x)
and Bz (t, x) depend on x and t? Well, any surface S can be built as the surface of a
collection of small cubes. Thus, if we could verify our equations for a single small cube,
wed be done. We will consider the following small cube
dz
dy
(x,y,z)
dx
Z
~ dS
~ = Bz (t, x)dxdy Bz (t, x)dxdy = 0.
B
Thus, Maxwells second equation is also satisfied.
Next, consider Maxwells third equation. We will integrate the third equation over
the top face of the cube.
Ey(x,t)
3
4
2 dy
dx
Ey(x+dx,t)
Fig. 43: Shown is the top face of the cube. The face itself is the surface S;
the boundary of the face is the curve C. The direction of C is chosen so that
~ points out of the cube.
when we use the right hand rule the unit normal dS
R
~ d~l. Since E
~ points in the y direction, the electric field is orthogonal
First, we evaluate E
to d~l for the segment of the path labelled 1 and hence the contribution from this segment
of the path vanishes. The direction of the path segment labelled 2 is parallel to the electric
field so that the contribution from the segment of the path labelled 2 is Ey (x + dx, t)dy.
Once again, along the segment of the path labelled 3 d~l is orthogonal to the electric field
so that again the contribution from this segment of the path vanishes. Finally, for the
segment of the path labelled 4, the field and d~l are pointing in opposite directions so that
the contribution from this segment of the paths is Ey (x, t)dy. Thus,
Z
It is easy to obtain
Z
~ dS
~ = Bz dxdy.
B
S
(27.1)
Finally, consider the last of Maxwells equations. This time, we will choose S to be
the front face of the cube. Proceeding exactly as we did for Maxwells third equation, we
obtain
Z
and
d
0 0
dt
~ dS
~ = 0 0 Ey .
E
t
Bz
Ey
=
.
t
x
(27.2)
x2
xt
(27.3)
.
0 0
x2
t2
The product 0 0 has the dimensions of an inverse speed squared. In fact,
1
0 0
3 108 ms1 is equal to the speed of light. This is how Maxwell first understood that this
equation is describing light waves. We will rewrite this equation as
1 2
2
c2 t2
x2
Ey (t, x) = 0.
(27.4)
x=
1 +
(x + x ),
2
ct =
1 +
(x x ).
2
1
=
x
2
x c t
Ey = 0.
+
x x
Ey = f(x ).
x
Integrating this equation with respect to x and realizing that the arbitrary constant of
integration is now any function of x+ , we obtain
Ey = f (x ) + g(x+ ) = f (x ct) + g(x + ct),
as the general solution to (27.4).
What is the physical interpretation of these solutions? Well, if f (u) describes a pulse
centred at u = 0, then f (x ct) describes a pulse centred at x = ct. Thus, f (x ct)
corresponds to a pulse moving along the positive x axis. Similarly, g(x + ct) describes a
pulse moving along the negative x axis.
There is one loose end remaining - we have obtained the electric field; how do we
obtain the magnetic field. This could be obtained by integrating
Bz
Ey
=
.
x
t
with respect to t. For the electric field that we have considered above, it is easy to see that
Bz =
1
1
f (x ct) g(x + ct).
c
c
You would also need to add the arbitrary constant of integration, which could be any
function of x. This arbitrary function is fixed by considering our second equation
Bz
Ey
= 0 0
.
x
t
If you were given a solution of Maxwells equations, there is a nice method which
you can use to determine the direction of propagation of the wave - you can compute the
~ B,
~ which points in the direction of propagation. Indeed, it is easy to
Poynting vector E
check that for a right moving wave
Ey = f (x ct),
Bz =
1
f (x ct),
c
~ B
~ =
E
1 2
f (x ct), 0, 0) ,
c
which does indeed point along the positive x-axis. For a left moving wave
Ey = g(x + ct),
1
Bz = g(x + ct),
c
1
2
~ B
~ = g (x + ct), 0, 0) ,
E
c
which now points along the negative x-axis.
We will now study a specific example, that is, well study a particular choice for the
functions f and g. The example we will study is
Ey (x, t) = A cos (k(x ct)) .
We call A the amplitude of the wave. You should check that
1 2
2
c2 t2
x2
Ey (x, t) = 0.
Fig. 44: A sketch of a light wave showing the electric and magnetic fields
which are perpendicular.
The wave is periodic is space. The length that it takes to complete a full wave is called
the wavelength of the wave. The argument of the cosine in our solution is k(x ct); if we
have two points x1 and x2 which are separated by a wavelength (i.e. x1 = x2 + ), then
because the value of the wave is the same at x1 and x2 we must have
k(x1 ct) k(x2 ct) = 2 = k.
We can solve this to obtain
k=
2
,
2
.
k
The solution is also periodic in time. If you sit at a specific location ~x you will see the
wave repeats itself after a time T called the period of the wave. Arguing exactly as above,
we must have (t2 = t1 + T )
k(x ct1 ) k(x ct2 ) = 2 = kcT.
Thus, T =
c.
frequency =
Rather than talking of the period of the wave, we like to speak about the
1
T
We are going to start with a simple question: how much energy is there in an electric
field? To answer this question, imagine the following situation: we are going to start with
two uniformly charged plates of equal area A and opposite charge Q. We imagine that
the two plates are initially coincident, and that we pull the positive plate (say) a distance
d from the negative plate.
+
+
+
+
pull here
Q
,
20 A
so that the force exerted on the positive plate by the negative plate is
2
~ = Q .
|F~ | = Q|E|
20 A
Since we exert this force for a distance d, the net energy we expend in moving the plate is
E = |F~ |d =
1 ~ ~
Q2
d = 0 E
E Ad.
20 A
2
Where did the energy that we expend go to? Well, before we started pulling, the plates
were at rest. After we have finished pulling the plates are at rest and there is an electric
field between the plates. It is natural to think that the energy we expended is now stored
in the electric field we have just created. The electric field occupies a volume Ad, so that
the energy of the electric field per unit volume (that is the energy density of the electric
field) is
1 ~ ~
0 E E.
2
Of course, if the electric field has an energy, then so will the magnetic field. It turns out
that the energy in the magnetic field is equal to
1 ~ ~
B B.
20
Given these results, we can now compute the energy carried by light. Imagine we have
some area A, perpendicular to the direction in which our light wave is travelling. Our light
wave has an energy density = e + m where e is the energy density of the electric field
and m is the energy density of the magnetic field. Using our result above, you should
be able to check that for light e = m . We would like to compute the amount of energy
passing the area A every second. In one second, light can travel c ms1 1s=3 108 m.
Thus, all of the light inside a box with dimensions Am2 c ms1 1s will pass the screen.
This implies that an energy
Area A
|
Fig. 46: The light wave has an energy density . The area A is perpendicular
to the direction in which the light travels.
~ EAc,
~
E = Ac = (e + m )Ac = 2e Ac = 0 E
passes the screen every second. Thus, the power per unit area from our light wave is
~ Ec.
~
P = 0 E
You can also write this power per unit area as
r
P =
0 ~ ~
1
~ E.
~
EE =
E
0
377Ohms
You can use this to estimate the size of the electric field in a light wave. For example,
imagine that a 100W bulb is glowing. At a distance of 1m from the bulb, the power per
unit area is
P =
100W
,
4(1m)2
so that
s
~ =
|E|
100W
377Ohms 60V m1 .
4(1m)2
29. Relativity
What are we going to do in this section? In this section we will study the symmetries of
Maxwells equations and show that they are not the same as the symmetries of Newtons
equations.
j,j6=i
where F~ij is the force exerted exerted on particle i by particle j. Notice that the force
depends only on the difference ~xi ~xj .
00
11
00
11
00
11
xi
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
flies
a ship
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
00
11
1111
11111111
11111111111111111
0000
00000000
00000000000000000
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
00
11
where ~v is the (constant but otherwise arbitrary) velocity of the ship. We say that this is
a symmetry of Newtons laws because if the ~xi (t) are solutions of Newtons laws then so
are the ~x0i (t). To see this, note that
d2
d2 0
d2 0
~
x
=
(~
x
(t)
+
~
v
t)
=
~x (t),
i
dt2
dt2 i
dt2 i
and
~xi ~xj = ~x0i ~x0j ,
You can summarise this by saying something like all motion is relative. We call the
transformations between the two coordinate system S (that is the coordinates ~x, t of the
person who is not moving) and S 0 (that is the coordinates ~x0 , t0 of the person who is
moving) Galilean transformations.
In fact, it turns out that Galileo was wrong - the Galilean transformations are not
quite a symmetry of nature. To see this, lets return to Maxwells equations. If we have
one solution of Maxwells equations and we perform a Galilean transformation, do we get
another solution of Maxwells equations? Recall that when we had no charges and no
currents, the solution of Maxwells equations we found is given by
Ey (x, t) = f (x ct) + g(x + ct).
Consider the following Galilean transformation
t0 = t,
x0 = x + vt,
y 0 = y,
z 0 = z.
This transformation is for a velocity parallel to the x-axis. The inverse transformation is
t = t0 ,
x = x0 vt0 ,
y = y0 ,
z = z0,
which you can easily check. In terms of the new coordinates, our solution is
Ey (x, t) = f (x0 (v + c)t0 ) + g(x0 + (c v)t0 ).
This is not a solution of Maxwells equations, so that Maxwells equations are not invariant under the Galilean transformations. We could now ask what replaces the Galilean
transformations - that is, what are the symmetry transformations that take one solution
x = cx0+ + dx0 .
To get another solution of Maxwells equations, we need to transform our original solution
into a new solution. This means that our function which depends only on x should,
after the transformation, only depend on x0 and our function which depends only on x+
should, after the transformation, only depend on x0+ . For this to happen we need b = 0
and c = 0, i.e. our transformations are
x+ = ax0+ ,
x = dx0 .
(29.1)
In fact, this transformation is too general. It includes trivial transformations (called scaling) which essentially amount to a change of units. To see this, note that x are measured
in meters. If we change to a new set of coordinates, defined by the fact that we now
measure x in centimetres, we would have
x0 = 100x .
This looks like a transformation of the form (29.1) with a = d. We are not interested in
including these trivial transformations. To exclude these we will require that
dx+ dx = dx0+ dx0 .
Since dx+ dx has the dimensions of length squared, holding this quantity fixed will indeed
make sure that we are keeping our units fixed. This will also ensure that
dxdt = dx0 dt0 .
This extra condition forces a = d1 . Thus, lets set
a = e ,
d = e .
ct
x+
x+
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
1111111
0000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
111111
000000
1
1
0
0
x
x
Fig. 51: The coordinate system after the Lorentz transformation. The solid
lines are lines of constant ct0 and x0 .
To get some insight into the above transformations, we would now like to understand
the physical meaning of . To do this, consider a fly sleeping on the ship. The fly is
sleeping at x = 0. In this case, the Lorentz transformations are
x0 = sinh()ct
ct0 = cosh()ct.
Thus, the position of the fly in the S 0 coordinate system is
x0 = c tanh()t0 .
Thus, the velocity of the fly in the S 0 coordinate system in v = c tanh(). From this and
a little algebra we obtain
1
= cosh() = q
v2
c2
vx
),
c
v
c
x0 = (x + vt).
0. In this case our Lorentz transformations
Since our Lorentz transformations take us from a solution in the S coordinate system,
which is an arbitrary function of x+ plus a second arbitrary function of x to a solution
in S 0 which is an arbitrary function of x0+ plus an arbitrary function of x0 , we learn that
light travels at the same speed in the S coordinate system as in the S 0 coordinate system.
Thus, the speed of light is a constant (independent of whether you are in S or S 0 ) in special
relativity.
Warning to students: There may (with a probability 1) be errors in these notes. If
you spot an error, confirm this with a tutor or send us an email, and well correct the
notes. Happy learning and be excellent!