Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TENTH CIRCUIT
DEC 10 1998
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
No. 98-6247
v.
(W.D. Oklahoma)
KEN KLINGER,
Respondent - Appellee.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
this appeal.
U.S.C. 2254 habeas petition. McMeekan also seeks leave to appeal in forma
pauperis. 1 We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis; we grant a certificate of
appealability; and we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further
proceedings.
On March 8, 1996, McMeekan pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana
and to escape, 2 and he was sentenced to seven years imprisonment on each
conviction. Although he did not directly appeal, he eventually initiated state
court post-conviction proceedings, based upon a claim to relief which rest[ed]
entirely upon an argument that he [was] being denied equal protection, in that he
had received a harsher sentence than similarly situated persons who would be
sentenced under Oklahomas newly enacted Truth In Sentencing Act, 1997 Okla.
Sess. Laws ch. 133. R. Vol. I, Doc. 1, Exh. at 2. On February 5, 1998, the
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the state district courts denial of
McMeekans petition. Id., Doc. 1, Exh.
Following the adverse state court decision, McMeekan filed a 2254
petition in federal court in the Western District of Oklahoma, and the case was
-2-
-3-
Because the district court apparently considered the ex post facto argument
on the merits, we consider it properly before us in this appeal.
4
-4-
Stephen H. Anderson
Circuit Judge
-5-