Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
April 3, 2007
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
TENTH CIRCUIT
C LA RICE D . H A G A ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
No. 06-5107
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant Clarice D. Haga appeals from the denial of her claim for
supplemental security income benefits. W e have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
1291 and 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
The case was decided at step five of the five-step evaluation sequence. See
generally W illiams v. Bowen, 844 F.2d 748, 750-52 (10th Cir. 1988). Appellant
has numerous physical and mental impairments, partly resulting from long-term
and repeated physical and sexual abuse, the suicide of her sixth husband, and
limited education/intelligence. The administrative law judge (ALJ) determined
that appellant had the residual functional capacity (RFC) for light work (six hours
sitting, standing, or walking and ten to twenty pounds lifting, carrying, pushing,
or pulling) with the following non-exertional restrictions: limited to tasks
requiring only occasional stooping and simple, repetitive tasks with only
incidental contact with the public and no requirement for making change.
Aplt. App., Vol. II at 20. The ALJ further determined that appellant could not
return to her past w ork as a motel clerk, id. at 21, but could do the job of deli
cutter w ith her RFC, id. at 22.
-2-
-6-