Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2d 220
Bayless E. Biles, and Taylor D. Wilkins, Jr., Wilkins, Bankester, Biles &
Wynne, Bay Minette, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant.
William W. Watts, III, W. Dewitt Reams and Victor T. Hudson, Reams,
Vollmer, Philips, Killion, Brooks & Schell, Mobile, Ala., for defendantappellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Alabama.
Before HATCHETT, Circuit Judge, RONEY* and FAIRCHILD**, Senior
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
It appears to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that
this case involves a question of Alabama law which is determinative of the
cause and for which there appears to be no clear controlling precedent from the
Alabama Supreme Court. Therefore, the United States Court of Appeals for the
Eleventh Circuit certifies the following question of law based on the facts
recited below to the Supreme Court of Alabama for instructions.***
FACTS
4
7
DIRECTIONS
FOR USE AND CONDITIONS OF SALE AND WARRANTY.
IMPORTANT: Read the entire Directions for Use and the Conditions of Sale and
Warranty before using this product.
CONDITIONS OF SALE AND WARRANTY
8 Directions for Use of this product reflect the opinion of experts based on field
The
use and tests. The directions are believed to be reliable and should be followed
carefully. However, it is impossible to eliminate all risks inherently associated with
use of this product. Crop injury, ineffectiveness, or other unintended consequences
may result because of such factors as weather conditions, presence of other
materials, or the manner of use or application all of which are beyond the control of
CIBA-GEIGY or the Seller. All such risks shall be assumed by the Buyer. CIBAGEIGY warrants that this product conforms to the chemical description on the label
and is reasonably fit for the purposes referred to in the Directions for Use subject to
the inherent risks referred to above. CIBA-GEIGY makes no other express or
implied warranty of fitness or merchantability or any other express or implied
warranty. In no case shall CIBA-GEIGY or the Seller be liable for consequential,
special, or indirect damages resulting from the use or handling of this product. *
CIBA-GEIGY and the Seller offer this product, and the Buyer and user accept it,
subject to the foregoing Conditions of Sale and Warranty, which may be varied only
by agreement in writing signed by a duly authorized representative of CIBAGEIGY.
9
Southland purchased the products to prevent nut grass and potato rot. After
using the products on the potato fields, Southland experienced problems with
nut grass and rot which damaged a portion of its 1987 crop.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
10
Southland sued Ciba-Geigy in the United States District Court alleging breach
of an express warranty and seeking consequential damages including cost of the
field preparation, fertilizer, seed potatoes, crop dusting, labor, and lost profits.
Ciba-Geigy moved for partial summary judgment contending that the
disclaimer label on the product precluded Southland Farms from recovering
consequential damages. The district court adopted a United States Magistrate's
recommendation and granted Ciba-Geigy's motion for partial summary
judgment. This appeal followed.
11
12
Whether
the disclaimer on Ciba-Geigy's product is unconscionable and precludes
the recovery of consequential damages.
13
14
QUESTION CERTIFIED.
See Rule 34-2(b), Rules of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
**
Honorable Thomas E. Fairchild, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Seventh
Circuit, sitting by designation
*** Although the parties have not questioned jurisdiction, we are obligated to