Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
HOME
Search
STEVEN TAVARES
SHARE
7 COMMENTS
Follow Us!
Be Our Fan
FOLLOW BY
EMAIL
Email address...
Submit
EMAIL THE
CITIZEN
Email me at
steventavares.ebc@gm
ail.com
EBC PODCAST
ON ITUNES
2016 ELECTION
Today
So many variables still exist in deciding whether San Leandro Mayor Tony
Santos wins re-election or Stephen Cassidy pulls off the big upset. The registrar
says 121,000 voter-by-mail ballots still need to be counted, primarily from
voters who delivered their envelopes to the polls Tuesday instead of sending
them through the mail. Nobody seems to have a handle on which candidates
Councilwoman Joyce Starosciak's 23 percent votes may leaned towards as
their second choice, but here's an electoral possibility sure to rankle residents.
With Santos and Cassidy nearly deadlocked with 35 percent of the vote, there is
a remote chance neither could break the 50 percent threshold. If this occurs,
San Leandro could be in uncharted territory and risk having the experiment of
Ranked Choice Voting blow up in its collective face.
Tags
Archives
Tweets by @eastbaycitizen
Steven Tavares
@eastbaycitizen
.@bauce_man82 @PortofOakland
Colbruno supports the A's at Howard
The problem is the City Charter calls for a winner with a simple majority of the
vote. RCV is suppose to deliver this result in a single election, instead of a
costly primary and general election race. The mayor and city council were sold
on the idea of fiscal responsibility in regard to election costs. Santos said
Wednesday he would call for an special runoff election early next year if no
candidate receives a simple majority.
Proponents of RCV never said the voting system was perfect, but two
peculiarities they said rarely occur may decide this race for mayor. In San
Francisco's seven years using RCV the candidate who won the most first-place
votes went on to victory in every single race. Don Perata's campaign for mayor
in Oakland touted this statistic yesterday, but the difference between that race
and San Leandro's is the former State Senate Pro-Tem holds a double-digit lead
in the first round over Oakland Councilwoman Jean Quan and Rebecca Kaplan.
Conversely, through Thursday afternoon, Cassidy holds only a slim 66-vote
advantage over Santos.
In the meantime, the city waits, but its notoriously fickle residents, may chose
to reconsider RCV if this race veers into additional cost and controversy.
Posted in: Don Perata , IRV , J e a n Q u a n , Joyce Starosciak , O a k l a n d , RCV ,
fan.
1h
Steven Tavares
@eastbaycitizen
1h
CLICK HERE!
Steven Tavares
Newer Post
Home
Older Post
JUNE PRIMARY
@eastbaycitizen
I think it was more like 4am
twitter.com/brianrmcguire/
7 comments :
1h
A. Rose says:
November 4, 2010 at 7:13 PM
Powered by Blogger.
I'm glad that the RCV is showing to be a farce. Thanks to the Chamber of
Commerce and Maltester hacks who hoisted this crap on the dumbasses in this
City in 2000.
View on Twitter
Reply
FEATURED POST
Anonymous says:
November 4, 2010 at 8:17 PM
The Registra of Voters should have done robo calls to all votes explaining how
IRV works.A thirty second call would have done the job. Most voters didn't
understand how it worked and didn't have enough time to evaluate who their
second and third choice should be. They could also do a robo call a week or so
before the registration deadline. Most people according to registration experts
know when election day is but few know the deadline date which could boost
registration and participation.
Reply
Anonymous says:
November 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM
Anonymous says:
November 5, 2010 at 8:16 AM
Didn't the EastBayCitizen write that "RCV May Aid Incumbent Mayor in the Fall"
late January?
Santos was a big proponent of RCV, even having a lobbyist in his hotel room
during the council discussion to help him with his talking points!
POPULAR POSTS
Alameda mayor opposes rent
control measure, while others
begin to take sides
http://www.eastbaycitizen.com/search?q=santos+hill
Why the Hayward school board placed
Dobbs on paid administrative leave
Reply
Anonymous says:
November 5, 2010 at 8:26 AM
Cassidy supported it as well and spoke at the city council on its behalf.It
prevents the cost of a run off for campaigns as well as tax payers.Less global
warming since it will mean less hot air.
Reply
Anonymous says:
November 5, 2010 at 9:33 AM
The San Leandro Charter says 50% plus one, but in the event this doesn't occur,
the City Council shall establish a run-off system to determine the person elected.
When the technology became available, the Council by ordinance, could adopt
instant run-off voting instead of a special election. This is what occurred.
Whoever is ahead after this election is certified by the registrar of voters, wins the
Mayor's race.
Reply
Anonymous says:
November 7, 2010 at 8:24 PM
"Instant" Run-off is no such entity. A runoff is where the top two vote getters are
able to compete for votes. Instant run-off is tantamount to saying well I like A
more than B but I'm too stupid to figure out what I want.
Reply
Post a Comment
Publish
Preview
CONNECT WITH US
RECOMENDED
INSTRUCTIONS