Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. Introduction
Thermoelectric (TE) materials provide a solution for power generation and is
considered as an attractive option for waste heat recovery systems [1]. The
main obstacle to widespread use of TEs in diverse industries is the low
efficiency of TE materials for converting thermal energy into electric energy [2].
TE conversion efficiency is mainly determined by the dimensionless
thermoelectric figure of merit, ZT, defined as ZT = S2T/(e+L), where S is the
Seebeck coefficient, T is the absolute temperature, is the electrical resistivity,
e and L are the electronic and lattice thermal conductivities respectively. Thus,
the higher the ZT, the greater the TE performance. S, and e are interrelated,
making one parameter difficult to optimize without adversely affecting the
others. Therefore, high ZT values arise from the beneficial combination of high
power factor, S2, and low thermal conductivity, ( e+L) [3]. Enhancing the
power factor can be obtained by many methods, such as band engineering and
electronic state distortion to enhance the Seebeck coefficients [4, 5]. Low
thermal conductivity can be obtained by either filling the voids of the crystal
structure in TE materials with cage-like structures or by nanopatterning and
nanostructuring [6, 7].
eight simple cubic metal sublattices are filled with a near square planar ring
formed by four pnictogen atoms (Sb4).
Skutterudites are intermetallic compounds with a non-congruent melting point.
Melt spinning method had been explored as an alternative processing method.
The advantage of applying rapid solidification techniques to materials such as
skutterudites lies in the quenching-in of the peritectic microstructure with small
grain size (dependent on the wheel velocity). This results in a very short lengthscale for reactant diffusion resulting in faster solid state conversion of the
desired phase [10].
5 MPa during 1.5 min. Finally, the resulting green body was annealed at 650 C
during 2 hr. The heating and cooling rates were of 10 C/min.
Phase composition was determined by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD)
(PANalytical: XPert PRO. Cu K). Rietveld refinement of the XRD diffraction
pattern was carried out using the Fullprof program [11].
The morphology of the ribbons and of the annealed sample were analyzed by
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JEOL-JSM 5800). Chemical composition
and sample homogeneity were checked by Energy-Dispersive X-Ray (EDX)
microanalysis attached to the SEM. The actual composition was determined by
averaging distinct spots on the surface of each sample and by normalizing the
resulting chemical formula to a cobalt atom.
I-V curves of the annealed prism-shaped sample (8 x 8 x 2 mm 3) were
measured by the AC four-probe method between 2 and 300 K. The sample was
soldered to the puck of the AC Transport Option of a Physical Property
Measurement System (PPMS, Quantum Design) using four silver wires and
Pb/Sn braze.
Seebeck coefficient, electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity were
measured between 3 and 400 K several times on the as-obtained sintered
sample and after cutting the sample to confirm the previous results. A 4-point
method in thermal transport option (TTO) of a Physical Property Measurement
System (PPMS, Quantum Design) was used to measure the thermoelectric
properties. The PPMS sample puck provides both thermal and electrical
contacts to the sample.
The low-temperature heat capacity was measured on a 23.6 (+/0.02) mg
sample from 5 to 50 K in a Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS,
Quantum Design). The sample was fixed to the platform by a small amount of
thermal conductive grease. The heat capacity contributions of the puck and of
the layer of grease were measured in an addendum run prior the sample
measurement and subtracted from the data to obtain the heat capacity of the
sample.
Fig 1. (a) XRD pattern of the ribbons obtained by melt spinning, (b) plot of the
observed intensity, the calculated intensity and the intensity difference for the
Rietveld refinement of the annealed bulk sample.
3.2 Microstructure
The melt-spun ribbon have two distinct surfaces: one that directly touches the
copper wheel (contact surface) and another which does not contact the copper
wheel (free surface). These two sides differ in their microstructure. The
microstructure on the contact surface exhibit two different zones, one of them
with rounded grains located into a depression with size distribution between
0.5 and 1.25 m, and other zone with a mix of rounded, square and irregular
grain shapes, with a boarder size distribution, from 0.1 to 1 m, as observed in
SEM-BEI image in Fig. 2a. The free surface exhibit rounded grains with welldefined grain boundaries, as shown in SEM-BEI images in Fig. 2b, with a grain
4
BEI
4,000X
5m
(a)
SEI
4,000X
5m
5,000X
3m
(b)
500X
(c)
BEI
40m
SEI
(d)
Fig 2. (a) Backscattered electron image (BEI) of the contact surface of the
ribbon and (b) BEI of the free surface of the ribbon, (c) SEI of the annealed
bulk material at 500X and (d) 5,000X.
interval, from 2 and 40 K, showed that the non-linear and hysteretic behavior
appears at T < 30 K.
Fig 4. (a) Electric resistivity, (b) Seebeck coefficient, (c) thermal conductivity
and, (d) lattice thermal conductivity for the CoSb 3 annealead sample.
Co i
very low formation energy value of 0.5 eV. This low formation energy value can
yield a high concentration of
Co i
Co i -
pair was proposed, which is a stable defect at low temperature. Unlike the
isolated
Coi , the
Sharp relates the bandgap, Eg, with the absolute maximum value of the total
Seebeck coefficient,
absolute maximum value occurs. Then, from the measured absolute maximum
value of the Seebeck coefficient, a calculated value
E g=0.48 eV
was
obtained, which is comparable with the values reported by W.S. Liu et. al. [17].
Experimental observations made by W.S. Liu et. al. led to the conclusion that ntype CoSb3 has a larger energy bandgap than p-type CoSb 3.
Fig. 4c shows the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of
CoSb3. Interestingly, our sample presents a thermal conductivity value of 3.2
WK-1m-1 at 300 K, which is lower than typical values of CoSb 3 prepared by
traditional methods (7.0 WK-1m-1) [21], and this fact is an incentive to improve
the figure of merit ZT. Thermal conductivity presents a maximum value of 8.24
WK-1m-1 at 50 K. For temperatures lower than 50 K, thermal conductivity
decreases due to the decreasing of specific heat when the temperature
decreases, as proposed in the Debye phonon model. For temperatures higher
than 50 K thermal conductivity decreases due to thermally activated phononphonon Umklapp scattering process.
Fig. 4d shows the lattice thermal conductivity estimated using the relation
e =L0 T , where
L0
e , is given by the
10-8 WK-2). Comparing Fig. 4d with Fig. 4c, it can be seen that the lattice
thermal conductivity, L , is the dominant contribution to the total thermal
conductivity because of the relatively high values of electrical resistivity , i.e.,
L .
Fig. 5 shows the temperature dependence of the calculated thermoelectric
figure of merit, ZT, from the measured values of S, and . The maximum
value
ZT =0.015
C p /T
10
f ( x )= + x + A 2E 1 x(3 /2)
E1 / x
E2 / x
e
2
(3 /2)
+
B
E2
/ x
2
/ x
2
(e
1)
(e
1)
e
E1
E2
x=T 2
, and are the electronic and lattice contributions to the specific heat
respectively,
E 1
modes, and
and
and
E 2
B
obtained fitted values with the Debye model only (i), the Debye model plus one
Einstein mode (ii) and the Debye model plus two Einstein modes (iii). As it can
be
seen
from
Table
1,
the
goodness of fit improves with the inclusion of Debye model plus two Einstein
modes,
with
a
Chi squared value
calculated
4
from
the
2
D=(12 N A k B / 5 )
fitted
value
of
and
using
295 K was
the
formula
Fig 6. Cp/T vs T2 plot obtained from the nonlinear least square fitting of specific
heat experimental data () to a model containing the Debye model plus two
Einstein modes. From the fitting the relative contributions to the electronic
11
specific heat (), Debye term () and the two Einstein modes (E1 and E2) were
obtained.
Fitted
Paramet
er
(J/molK2)
(J/molK4)
A (J/molK)
E1 (K)
B (J/molK)
E2 (K)
2
0.0808
Debye model +
one Einstein mode
(ii)
0.0207
Debye model+
two Einstein
modes (iii)
0.0099
2.6272 x 10-4
1.3135 x 10-4
7.4966 x 10-5
20.7778
5.3883
107.54
-
68.21
32.4088
0.1974
0.0041
145.73
0.0002
Table 1. Physical parameters for three different models: the Debye model only
(i), the Debye model plus one Einstein mode (ii) and the Debye model plus two
Einstein modes (iii). The parameters were obtained by nonlinear least square
fit of specific heat data.
then a change in the trend was observed, due to the change from extrinsic to
intrinsic conduction. The energy bandgap, influenced by the Sb-deficiency, was
calculated to be 0.48 eV. The maximum figure of merit reached was of 0.015 at
the maximum measured temperature of 400 K. Future word aims to enhance
the figure of merit though several methods, including additional doping and
nanostructuration. From specific heat data, a Debye temperature,
D=
295
K, was calculated and the presence of localized low-lying phonon modes, with
Einstein temperatures of E1 = 68.21 and E2 = 145.73 K were identify.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Wee, D., et al., Effects of filling in CoSb3: Local structure, band gap, and
phonons from first principles. Physical Review B, 2010. 81(4): p. 045204.
Kurosaki, K., A. Harnwunggmoung, and S. Yamanaka, Thermoelectric
Properties of CoSb3 Based Skutterudites Filled by Group 13 Elements, in
Nanoscale Thermoelectrics, X. Wang and M.Z. Wang, Editors. 2014,
Springer International Publishing: Cham. p. 301-325.
Cohn, J., et al., Glasslike heat conduction in high-mobility crystalline
semiconductors. Physical Review Letters, 1999. 82(4): p. 779.
Heremans, J.P., et al., Enhancement of thermoelectric efficiency in PbTe
by distortion of the electronic density of states. Science, 2008.
321(5888): p. 554-557.
Pei, Y., et al., Convergence of electronic bands for high performance bulk
thermoelectrics. Nature, 2011. 473(7345): p. 66-69.
Minnich, A.J., et al., Bulk nanostructured thermoelectric materials:
current research and future prospects. Energy & Environmental Science,
2009. 2(5): p. 466-479.
Chen, Z.-G., et al., Nanostructured thermoelectric materials: Current
research and future challenge. Progress in Natural Science: Materials
International, 2012. 22(6): p. 535-549.
Dong, Y., et al., Crystal structure and high temperature transport
properties of Yb-filled p-type skutterudites YbxCo2.5Fe1.5Sb12. Journal of
Solid State Chemistry, 2014. 209: p. 1-5.
Morelli, D., et al., Low-temperature transport properties of p-type CoSb 3.
Physical Review B, 1995. 51(15): p. 9622.
Salvador, J.R., et al., Thermoelectric and mechanical properties of melt
spun and spark plasma sintered n-type Yb- and Ba-filled skutterudites.
Materials Science and Engineering: B, 2013. 178(17): p. 1087-1096.
Rodrguez-Carvajal, J., Recent advances in magnetic structure
determination by neutron powder diffraction. Physica B: Condensed
Matter, 1993. 192(12): p. 55-69.
Park, C.-H. and Y.-S. Kim, Ab initio study of native point-defects in CoSb 3:
Understanding off-stoichiometric doping properties. Physical Review B,
2010. 81(8): p. 085206.
Claeys, C.L., et al., Low temperature electronics: physics, devices,
circuits, and applications. . 1 ed. 2001.
Ganichev, S.D., et al., Distinction between the Poole-Frenkel and
tunneling models of electric-field-stimulated carrier emission from deep
13
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
14