Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1SRK
Consulting UK Ltd, Cardiff, UK; 2 SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd, wgibson@srk.com.au, Perth, Australia. Contact: mraynor@srk.co.uk
Overview
The importance of lithostatic unloading in the evolution of pore pressures in pit slopes is well documented and increasingly evident in monitoring data from
operational mine sites. Alongside localized permeability enhancement resulting from blast damage, unloading typically serves to reduce pore pressures
through expansion of pit floor and wall rock masses. Such pore pressure changes are a key input to the slope design process but are rarely simulated or
accounted for in hydrogeological decision making processes. Failure to represent these processes can lead to the over prediction of pore pressures in the
slope design process.
Constants
Paramete
r
Unit
A number of modeling codes have been developed to simulate these hydromechanical processes but constraining the input parameters is notoriously
difficult. Furthermore, currently available codes do not offer the flexibility and range of features of MODFLOW which are required for the representation of
local scale hydrogeological features and the appropriate evaluation of broader mine site hydrogeological issues.
Hydromechanical Coupling
This poster presents data demonstrating lithostatic unloading and associated aquifer property and pore pressure change. In addition, a practical and
pragmatic addition to the industry standard groundwater modeling package MODFLOW to permit coupled simulation of hydro-mechanical processes is
introduced. In essence we are looking to include: rock mass removal, associated stress change, expansion, aquifer property change and hydraulic head
change. The new module for MODFLOW is being developed collaboratively by hydrogeologists and geotechnical engineers. The module is intended improve
the realism and efficiency of pore pressure simulation where the broader hydrogeological environment must be incorporated into the slope scale pore
pressure simulations.
Pore pressure
Effective stress
1/Pa
1/Pa
kg/m3
s
g
kg/m3
m/s2
TOPO
m
kg/m3
-
Sy
Ss
H
T
Skempto
n_B
Pa
m/day
Constants & Variables (note the number of variables that would normally
be considered constants in conventional groundwater modelling)
Total stress
Description
Material compressibility (this is the inverse of the bulk
modulus)
Water Compressibility
Density of Water
Density of Solids (i.e. the SG of the solid phase, independent
of porosity)
Gravity
Topographic surface, which incorporates the time-variant pit
shell
Dry Bulk Density, a function of s and n
Total Porosity
Specific Yield, assumed to have a linear correlation with n for
the purposes of initial testing
Specific Storage, calculated based on n, &
Hydraulic head at cell centre
Total calculated stress at cell base, incorporating mass of
overlying soil based on TOPO & ; weight of water in
saturated zone (n), and retained water in unsaturated zone
(n - Sy)
Skemptons B Coefficient (equivalent to / ( + n)),
assuming an incompressible solid phase.
Hydraulic Conductivity, assumed to have a linear correlation
with n for the purposes of initial testing
Ss = g + n
Type 1: Direct solid to fluid coupling, where a change in
stress results in a change in pore pressure
Type 2: Direct fluid to solid coupling, where a change in pore
pressure results in a change rock mass volume
Type 3: Indirect solid to fluid coupling, where a change in
stress causes a change in the hydraulic properties of the rock
Type 4: Indirect fluid to solid coupling, where a change in
pore pressure results in a change in the mechanical
properties of the rock
dVT
=
VW
de
dVW
VT
dp
Field Examples
Next steps