Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
12/8/15
Accounting 507 Text Chapter 2 Conceptual Framework
Basic Questions:
1. What is a conceptual framework?
Ans: The conceptual framework is a body of interrelated objectives and fundamentals. The
objectives identify the goals and purposes of financial reporting and the fundamentals are the
underlying concepts that help achieve those objectives. Those concepts provide guidance in
selecting the transactions, events and circumstances to be accounted for, how they should be
recognized and measured and how they should be summarized and reported.
2. Should a conceptual framework lay the ground work for rules or explain existing
practice?
Ans: Yes a conceptual framework should lay the ground work for rules or explain the existing
practices. Conceptual framework does not make any changes to the existing practices but do
suggest about how to make it better. The framework influence in the development of new
accounting standards. As the purpose of financial reporting is to provide useful information as a
basis for economic decision making, a conceptual framework will form a theoretical basis for
determining how transactions should be measured (historical value or current value) and reported
i.e. how they are presented or communicated to users.
3. What is the objective of a set of financial statements?
Ans: The objective of financial statements is to provide information in such a manner that
portrays a cohesive financial picture of an entity which can be useful to a wide range of users in
making economic decisions.
4. Who is the audience?
Ans: The audience may be existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors. They are
the primary users to whom general purpose financial reports are directed. Other parties, such as
regulators and members of the public can be considered as audience as well.
5. Have the objectives or audience changed over time?
Ans: The objectives have not changed but there are contradicting views on the objectives. Some
believe that accountability should be the primary objective whereas others argue that prediction
of future cash flows is more important.
The type of audience has remained the same but the numbers are changed occasionally.
Title
State
Superseded
#2
Superseded
#3
Superseded
#4
Not
discussed
#5
active
#6
Replaced 3
#7
active
#8
Replaced
1, 2 and 3
16. Materiality?
Ans: Materiality is an entity-specific aspect of relevance based on the nature or magnitude or
both of the items to which the information relates in the context of an individual entitys financial
report.
18. What are the differences between the capital maintenance and accounting transaction
approaches?
Ans: Under the capital maintenance approach, net income is defined as the maximum amount of
a firms resources that can be distributed to owners during a given period (exclusive of new
owner investments) and still leave the business enterprise as well off at the end of that period as
it was in the beginning.
Under the accounting transaction approach, accounting income is based on the actual
transactions entered into by the firm; primarily revenues arising from the sales of goods or
services minus the costs necessary to achieve these sales.
19. As per SFAC #5, a full set of financial statements should include?
Ans: As per SFAC #5, a full set of financial statements should include
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
20. What are the differences between earnings and comprehensive income?
Ans: Earnings are a measure of entity performance during a period. This value measures the
extent to which asset inflows (revenues and gains) exceed asset outflows. The concept of
earnings provided in SFAC No. 5 is similar to net income for a period determined under the
transactions approach.
SFAC No. 5 defined comprehensive income as a broad measure of the effects of transactions and
other events on an entity. It comprises all recognized changes in equity of the entity during a
period from transactions except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to
owners.
21. What are the differences between a rules based approach and a principles based approach
to accounting issues?
Ans: Rule based approach and principles based approach can be differentiated
through the example of goodwill. Under rules-based approach, Goodwill is to be
amortized over a 40 year life until it is fully amortized. This requirement leaves
no room for judgment or disagreement about the amount of amortization expense
to be recognized. Comparability and consistency across firms and through time is
virtually assured under such a rule. However, the requirement lacks relevance
because it does not reflect the underlying economics of the reporting entity, which
differ across firms and through time.
On the contrary, under principles-based approach, Goodwill is not amortized. Any
recorded goodwill is to be tested for impairment and if impaired, written down to
its current fair value on an annual basis. This requirement necessitates the
application of judgment and expertise by both managers and auditors. The goal is
to record the economic deterioration of the asset, goodwill