Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 9

7

1946 .

2 2016


.. : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
.. :
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26

.. : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44

.. . . . . . . . . . . .59

.. . . . .74

.. . . . . . . . .86

.. :
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102

. . -. . 7. . 2016. 2

CONTENTS
History of Foreign Philosophy

G a g i n s k y A.M. Background of the doctrine of transcendental in Antiquity: Pre-aristotelian period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3


M a l k i n a S.M. Rhetoric on overcoming metaphysics: serialization
and the chain of supplements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
P l a t o n o v R.S. Polysemy of term in Aristotles ethics. . . . . . . .26

.. *

Religious Studies
P o l y a k o v a S.V. From Karsavin to Vaneev: The Story of a theological
turn in the USSR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44
Philosophical Problems of Natural Science
I a k o v l e v V.A. Information paradigm of being . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59
Philosophy of Politics
M o s c h e l k o v E.N. Politics as object for philosophic analysis . . . . . . . .74
Philosophy and Culturology
L e v o c h s k i y S.S. The symbol of the Night in German romanticism . . . .86
Ethics
Z e l e n s k i y O.A. Humes motivational argument: difficulties of interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102

.
, 2016
2


: **
,
, .
. , ,
,
. , ,
(, , , , ), ( )
. ,
, .
, ,
XIII . ,
.
: , , , , ,
, , , , , ,
, .
A.M. G a g i n s k y. Background of the doctrine of transcendental in Antiquity:
Pre-aristotelian period
The paper shows that the medieval doctrine of the transcendentals appeared
under the influence of ancient philosophy, which has been prepared all the necessary prerequisites for this. The author notes the impact of language on philosophy. In particular, a reference to the Indo-European etymology shows that
Truth and Goodness go back to the basis meaning Being in broad sense. Therefore, it is no accident that the concept of Being, Truth and Goodness play special role in the Presocratic (Xenophanes, Parmenides, Zeno of Elea, Heraclitus,
Gorgias), Socratic (Euclid of Megara) and especially in Platos philosophy. By
the primary sources author shows how these concepts interact with each other.
At the same time it is noted that at this stage we still can not speak about transcendental paradigm in the strict sense of the word (this paradigm was appeared only
in the XIII century). Nevertheless, author shows that some elements of this doctrine were thought namely in ancient philosophy.
Key words: transcendentals, reversibility, being, one, true, good, Xenophanes,
Parmenides, Zeno of Elea, Heraclitus, Gorgias, Euclid of Megara, Plato.
* , , .: +7 (919) 992-92-78; e-mail: algaginsky@gmail.com
** ( -4660.2015.6
: ).

, , , XIII . : , ,
, , 1.
, . , ,
, , , ,
, .. , . , ( , ) ,
? ,

() (),
.. . , ,
. ,
2,
1 ,
, ,
: ()
, ( ) ( , , ) [Metaphysica,
1003 b 2226. , , ].
, (secundum rem)
(secundum rationem) . , , , idem in subiecto, differunt
ratione. :
, , ,
,
, ,
. , ,
, ,
,
[W. Goris, J. Aertsen, 2013] (. : [J. Gracia, 1992, p. 116]).
2 , ,
, , ,
(.: [Albertus. Commentarii,
p. 446450 (46, N, 1314)]). ,
, , ; ,
[] ,
[ , 2001, . 93].

. :
?
, ,
.
, . , , , .
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
. ,
,
, , ,
, , .
, ,
, . . ,
. , , ,
(*es-) [J. Pokorny, 1959, S. 340342;
D. Wodtko et al., 2008, S. 235243]. , ,
, -
(.: , ),
, , (.: , 3). , ,
,
. , , . ,
, , - .
, - .
.
,
. ,
3

[Ousia, 2008, p. 1546].


5

, , . , , ,
: , ,
, , , 4.
, , ( 530) , [DK, 21. A 29; 4; 34]. ? -, ,
, . ,
, ,
( ) [ibid.,
A 31]. , , :
(= ),
: (
), [] , (
) [ibid., A 30]. , , ,
.
, .
5, . ,
, .
. :
,
[W. Jaeger, 1947, p. 51].
, ( 504501),
. , , ,
(
( ) [DK, 28. B 8. 25],
).
[ibid., B 8. 149].
4

, , (.: [J. Barnes, 1982, p. 23]).


5 : [J. Palmer, 1999, p. 186189].
6

, , , ,
, [ibid., B 8. 6; 8. 27;
8. 2933]. ,
, , , ,
, , (), () [ibid., B 8. 6].
, , , , 6, ,
, .. .
: .
:
, 7, ,
.
, ( . 450), ,
,
, .
, , , ,
. :
, ()
(), ( )
().
, , . , ,
- .
, , , .
, ( . 440)
, .
, ,
. , , ( ), , :
, , . , ,
, [DK, 82. B 3. 73 (. .. )].
, ,
, , , , .
6 - ,
, , [ibid., B 2. 13; 4. 8; 6. 8; 8. 3, 19, 25, 3233,
35, 46, 47].
7 [ibid., B 3]; : , [ibid., 8. 34].

[.. , 2012, . 342].


, , ,
.. , . ,
.. , , [DK, 44. B 3; 6]. ,
: , .. , - : , ( ),
, [ibid., B 4].
, ,
, ,
, :
( )
, (
), : [ibid., B 6].
, - .
, ( ) [DK, 58. B 5].
, ( ) ,
. ,
[DK, 21.
A 30; DK, 29. B 7; A 13], ,
.
,
, ,
( . 500). ,
: , ,
8. , ,
,
. , ,
, . ,
8 , .. ,
,
, , , ,
[.. , 2009, . 363].

, .
, , : ,
[L., 1 (. .. )]9, : [L., 132 (. .. )],
, [L., 30]. ,
: ,
, : ,
[L., 29 (. .. )].
, , .
.. ,
(connection, connectedness). x : , , x
.
coincidentia oppositorum.
: () () [.. ,
2014, . 111]. , ,
, ,
: : , ,
, ... [L., 43 (. .. )]. , , , ,
- (secundum
rationem) (secundum
rem):
[L., 141].

. , ( . 395) ,
: ,
( ) : ,
, ..
, , ( ) [Diogenes, II.106].
( ) - ,
, 10,
. 9 . : ,
(DK, 22. B 50). ,
,
10 . : [, 1996, . 129133].

, : ,
, .
, , , ,
,
,
, .
()11,
,
. 12.
, , : ,
, ( ), [ 13]
[Metaphysica, 988 b 1113]14. , , , , .

[ibid., 1003 b 2632],
. , , , , () , .
, 15,
,
. 11 (.: [Topica, 103
b 719]; .: [.. ,
2011, . 212230], , () [Metaphysica, 1061 1518].
, : ,
, , (convertitur), , , [, 1996, . 176]. ,
. , ,
[J. Aertsen, 1996, p. 31].
12 . [K. Brthlein, 1966, S. 7289],
,
, . ,
.. [.. , 2012, . 57248], , , , .
13 , ,
, .
14 : [Ethica Eudemia, 1218 a 1634].
15 , (.. ) (c.: [.. , 2014, . 89107].

10

,
, .
, 16: ( ) [Plato. Respublica, 518c],
( ) [ibid., 526 e],
( ) [ibid., 532 ],
( )
[ibid., 517 b; 532 a], (
) [ibid., 532 a]17. ,
, , :
, [] ,
, , , 18. ,
, , , ,
. ? , - ,
, - , .
,
. ,
, , (-
[]); ,
,
(- [], []).
.
, . ,
, ,
[M. Baltes, 1997, p. 67].
, , ,

per se [ibid., p. 12]. ,
, ,
, 16 : [Plato. Respublica, 505 a; 508 e; 517 b; 534 b]; :
[ibid., 540 a]. , .
17 .: [M. Baltes, 1997, p. 323].

18 , ,
, [Plato. Respublica, 509 b].

11

19, . , , ,
.
, 20. , 21 ,
, ,
- , , .
(. 3.14), :
(
), (
) [De E apud Delphos, 393 ab]. , : , ( , ) [ibid.]22. ,
( ) [Platonicae quaestiones, 1002 b].
, ,
, .

,
.
, ,
, :
( ) ,
. ,
. ,
, . ,

, ,
, , , . , ,
, , , . , ,
/. ,
, ,
, . ,
, [Plato. Sophista, 254 a].
, (
), , ,
,
, ,
:
, ,
,
.
, , . ,
: ,
, ? . ,
, ,

,
( ) [Plato. Parmenides,
142 b (. .. .)]. , , , , , :

19 . ,
. , ,
. . :
, , . , , ; , ,
, - , , , ,
. <> , , ,
. , ,
. , , [Ch. Shields, 2011, p. 293].
20 .: [M. Baltes, 1997, p. 1223].
21 , [Justinus Martyr, 4. 1].
22 . : [Z. Plee, 2010, p. 93114].

,
( ), ( )
? <>
:
, ?
, ,
(
), -
; ,
, :
, (
),

12

13

,
[ibid., 142 142 e (. .. .)].
,
23.
, ..
:


.., ..
, ,
. : ,
[Plato. Sophista, 237 d].
: ,
, . , , . ,
, ,
.
. , - , ,
, , , , . ,
(.: [ibid., 240 b]), -
, - . ,
, , , , , ,
[. , 1993, . 345361]. ,
, . , , ,
23 , .: [.. , 2014, . 9697].

14

. , ,
.

Albertus. Commentarii Albertus Magnus. Commentarii in primum librum


sententiarum // Opera Omnia / Ed. S. Borgnet. P., 1893. Vol. 26.
De E apud Delphos Plutarchi moralia / Ed. W. Sieveking. Leipzig, 1929.
Vol. 3. P. 124.
Diogenes Diogenis Laertii vitae philosophorum / Ed. H.S. Long. Oxford:,
1964. 2 vols.
DK Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker / Hrsg. H. Diels, W. Kranz. B.,
19511952. Bd. 1.
Ethica Eudemia Aristoteles. Ethica Eudemia / Ed. F. Susemihl. Leipzig,
1884.
Justinus Martyr Justinus Martyr. Dialogus cum Tryphone / Ed. M. Marcovich. B.; N.Y., 1997.
L .. : ( ). ., 2014.
Metaphysica Aristotles metaphysics / Ed. W. Ross. Oxford, 1970. 2 vol.
Plato Platonis opera / In 5 vol. / Ed. J. Burnet. Oxford, 1905.
Platonicae quaestiones Plutarchi moralia / Ed. C. Hubert. Leipzig, 1954.
Vol. 6.1. P. 113142.
Topica Aristotelis topica et sophistici elenchi / Ed. W. Ross. Oxford, 1958.

. , ,
, , // .
. ., 1996.
. / . .. // .
. ., 1996.
.. // .
., 2014. 1.
. I / . .. // 1999. ., 2001.
.. . ., 2012.
.. // . XIV (
. .. ): . . ., 2009.
.. : (
). ., 2014.
.. . , 2011.
.. . ., 2012.
15

. // . :
. ., 1993 (Heidegger M. Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit // Heidegger M. Wegmarken. Frankfurt am Main, 1976).
Aertsen J. Medieval philosophy and the transcendentals: The case of Thomas
Aquinas. Leiden, 1996.
Baltes M. Is the idea of the good in Platos Republic beyond being? //
Studies in Plato and the Platonic tradition: Essays presented to John Whittaker /
Ed. M. Joyal. Aldershot, 1997.
Barnes J. The Presocratic philosophers. L.; N.Y., 1982.
Brthlein K. Zur platonischen Vorgeschichte der alten Transzendentalphilosophie // Kant-Studien. B., 1966. N. 57.
Goris W., Aertsen J. Medieval theories of transcendental // URL: http://plato.
stanford.edu/entries/transcendentals-medieval/
Gracia J. The transcendentals in the Middle ages: An introduction // Topoi.
Dordrecht, 1992. Vol. 11 (2).
Jaeger W. The theology of the Early Greek philosophers. Oxford, 1947.
Ousia dans la philosophie grecque des origines Aristote. Travaux du Centre
dtudes aristotliciennes de lUniversit de Lige / Ed. A. Motte, P. Somville.
Louvain-La-Neuve, 2008.
Palmer J. Platos reception of Parmenides. Oxford, 1999.
Plee Z. Plato and Parmenides in agreement: Ammoniuss praise of God as
one-being in Plutarchs The E At Delphi // Platos Parmenides and its heritage / Ed. J. Turner, K. Corrigan (Atlanta), 2010. Vol. 1.
Pokorny J. Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wrterbuch. Bern; Mnchen,
1959. Bd. 1.
Shields Ch. Surpassing in dignity and power: The metaphysics of goodness in
Platos Republic // Socratic, Platonic and Aristotelian studies: Essays in
Honor of Gerasimos Santas. Dordrecht, 2011.
Wodtko D., Irslinger B., Schneider C. Nomina im Indogermanischen Lexikon.
Heidelberg, 2008.

. . -. . 7. . 2016. 2

.. *
:

. . . . ,

( ),
,
.
: , , , , .
S.M. M a l k i n a. Rhetoric on overcoming metaphysics: serialization and the
chain of supplements
The article considers the problem of permanent renewal of discourse on
overcoming metaphysics in the history of philosophy. This phenomenon is studied
using Deleuzes concept of series and Derridas concept of supplement. The
author concludes that the question on the necessity of overcoming metaphysics
is connected not with the ideas of this or that philosophy (in this sense the division into metaphysical and non-metaphysical does not work in the philosophy), but with the serial formation of the very concept of metaphysicswhich is
markedby the eventualityof renewal sense and by the logic of supplement.
Key words: series, overcoming metaphysics, supplement, metaphysics, deconstruction.



, .
, , , ,
,
, * , ,

, .: 8 (845) 221-36-10; -mail: malkinasm@rambler.ru

16

17