Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
KOG 11203
OIL AND GAS PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS
JOURNAL TITLE:
SUCCESS FACTORS FOR OIL AND GAS PROJECT
DATE OF SUBMISSION
26 DECEMBER 2015
PREPARED FOR
MR. ZAKARIA ARIS
PREPARED BY
NO
1
2
NAME
CHENG WEI YET
MUHAMMAD FARUQ BIN BINTING
MATRIC NUMBER
MK1512001T
MK1512006T
Cost
2.
Time
3.
Risk
4.
Communication
Keywords
Critical success factor, Oil and Gas project, project knowledge area, EPCC, Project
management
i
Definition of Terms
i.
ii.
CSF Critical success factor. The elements that required for a project team to
achieve the target.
iii.
Knowledge area. It is typically extracted from the 5 project phases. It can include
integration, scope, time, cost, quality, human resource, communication, procurement
and risk.
iv.
Triple constraint. The constraint that typically a project face, including time
constraint, cost constraint, and scope (quality constrain).
v.
Iron octagon. Refer to the integrated triple constrain, as known as future project
constrains. It is including cost, time, scope, health and safety, environment, benefit,
stakeholder communication and sustainability.
ii
List of Figures
Figure No.
2.1
Page
iii
List of Tables
Table No.
Page
4.1
15
4.2
15
4.3
16
4.4
16
4.5
17
4.6
17
4.7
18
4.8
18
4.9
19
4.10
19
4.11
20
4.12
20
4.13
21
4.14
21
4.15
22
iv
4.16
22
4.17
23
4.18
23
1.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Project management is the art and science of managing all aspects of the projects to
achieve the project objective, within the given time, budgeted cost, and desirable quality
and specification, ensure working efficiently, effectively, and ethically in the project
environments (Alam and Khalifa, 2009). However, the selection and implementation of the
required tools and techniques are industry specific and also depend on the project manager
executing the project (PMI, 2008). Theoretically, project management has been broadly
explained around the world by several diverse professionals from different industries, but
practically is yet to be perfected leaving several anxieties for project managers while
executing projects. The application of above mentioned knowledge areas varies from project
to project and lapse in anyone of these can impact success of a project. Traditionally,
project success was assessed on the triple measure set of cost, time, and performance. A
project is considered successful if it was completed within its budget estimate, within its
initial scheduled time frame, and performed as it was designed to function (PMI, 2008).
Nowadays, as the demand of quality and public concern is getting higher, there are several
more criteria need to be fulfilled such as health and safety, environment, benefit,
stakeholder communication and sustainability. These form the latest project management
iron octagon. The oil and gas industry project always involved huge cost, high complexity
and always be the public concerns. This megaproject involved large scale investment which
typically costing more than billion Ringgit Malaysia. For example of megaproject at Malaysia
was Sabah Oil and Gas Terminal, SOGT which was completed by Samsung Engineering
costing RM 2.44bn (as per EPCC contract awarded). However, without the proper project
management system, the project might be completed with over budget, extended schedules
and undesirable quality. Hence, to avoid these problems, proper project management must
be practiced and put in order which including a description of the objectives and general
approach of the project, its resources and personnel, evaluation methods, and also a project
schedule as well as a description of potential problems that may be encountered.
1.2
The research can be justified through several reasons. By conducting the research, the
author able to find out the project success factors to ensure the fulfilment of several criteria
of project management such as being on-time, on-budget, having acceptable quality,
minimizes HSE issues, satisfying stakeholder expectations and so on. By identify the success
factors specifically on oil and gas industry project, the company or owner able to define the
corrective action plan which could solve the current problems and enhance the future
projects. The corrective plan can act as the lesson for the employees at which the solutions
to the challenges of past projects can be applied in future projects. It can also provide a
valuable source for risk management because all issues and concerns mentioned in a project
audit report are the project risks (Ahmad, 2015). Besides that, the success factors can be
the recommendations for those companies involve in oil and gas project. Lastly, the result of
the result can create the strategies on the issues that reflect the realities of oil and gas
project. Hence, the success factors can ensure a framework of good practise is applied
consistently as well as improved the efficiency of the project plan (Damiebi, D.F & Nazatul, S.
A. R., 2011)
1.3
The research consists of 5 parts starting with introduction, literature review, methodology,
data analysis and conclusion. A brief description for each part is provided as follows:
Introduction
It explained the background of the research and the justification for conducting the research.
Literature review
This part presents the theoretical framework and gaps in literature. The framework able to
classify the main success factor into sub success factors. This part also review some project
management issues related to the oil and gas industry.
Methodology
This part presents the methodology that used to find out the success factor for oil and gas
industry project. It also involves the research design and framework, justification for case
study approach and questionnaire survey based on experienced industrial workers, data
collection, analysis and the limitation and key assumption used to conduct the method. This
project paper has been carried out on participants selected from several departments of
Petronas Carigali Sabah Operation (PCSB SBO).
Data analysis
This part shows the analysed result from questionnaire survey form. The data analysis part
wills also ranking the prior factor which contributes to the success of an oil and gas project.
Lastly, it will summarize the findings as well as revise the theoretical framework stated on
previous part.
Conclusion
This part will conclude the issue raised above and the specific success factors of a project.
This part also explain the implication of for theory, policy and practise, methodology,
limitation of this research, the applicability of this research finding toward the other industry.
1.4
Chapter Summary
This chapter has reviewed the brief background of project management, the triple
constraints which are budget, time and quality as well as the future project management
iron octagon. By knowing the overview of the research, reader can figure out the
importance of success factors specifically to oil and gas industry related project. Besides that,
this project paper will assist readers to understand project management processes, its tools,
techniques and factors that are critical for the success of a project. The results established
will form a brief guideline for project managers to understand the essence of project
management, and understand factors that direct the outcomes of projects and implications
of non-compatibility with it in Malaysia environment of Oil & Gas industry.
By this research paper, project managers who executing the projects, will be able to
grasp the wide scope of project management and observe the role of various factors in
influencing the projects execution.
Adapting outcomes of this project paper, project managers will have a broader and
different vision of project management and will improve their performance and effectiveness
as project manager for their projects which will benefit them and their companies.
2.0
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1
Figure 2.1
cost management involve the project function like cost, finance, and claim. As mentioned
earlier part, a project is considered successful when it achieving the objectives within budget,
on time, delivering required quality, satisfying stakeholder and provided value added for all
stakeholders. Jaafari (2007) stated that the project success can be influenced by project
resources, capability and managerial approach as well as the commercial and physical
environment. While for Marques et al (2010), he stated that the risk assessment report is
main part of the project success.
For the success factor framework, it can be classified into 9 main success factors
which are project integration management, scope management, time management, cost
management,
quality
management,
human
resource
management,
communication
management, procurement management and risk management. Each of the success factors
may involve all or part of the above discussed project phase which are initiating, planning,
executing, monitoring and controlling and closing (PMI, 2008). According to the PMI (2008),
the project integration management involves standardize and coordination of different
project management process. Firstly, a project started with the initiating phase, a project
charter is developed by establishing statement which describes the need and purpose of the
project. Then, when reach the planning phase, the project management plan is prepared in
detail which will state how the project will be execute, monitor, control and closure. Then,
the next phase, project executing phase will direct the project team to perform their
responsibilities in order to hit the target or objectives. During the project execution phase,
monitoring and controlling will be carried out to make sure the project team is on the
correct pathway by doing the progress reporting. During the project execution, if there is
any change of requirement occurs, an integrated change control will function. Lastly, the
project is closed by comparing the result/ product with the objective of the project.
For the project scope management, a project can be success provided the company
able to deliver the desirable product. This can be achieved by collecting the requirements
and then make use of the planning software such as Microsoft Project or Primavera to
conduct the work breakdown structure (WBS). With the WBS, the project objectives will be
broken down in detail and to be performing by the team accordingly as well as ensuring only
the listed small activities in WBS will be conducted. However, if there is any undesirable
outcome which unsatisfied the stakeholders after verification, it can be listed down in the
punch list or snag list and to be repair. Lastly, the scope of the project can be control. For
the project time management, it is dealing with the managing of activities for certain time to
6
complete. Once the duration of the project estimated, the resource can also be estimated.
This can be done through by developing project schedule with the written down of
specifically date it start and finish. The preparation for the milestone of a project is also
considered as the project time management. The milestone can used to compare the actual
progress of the project with the planned schedule. For the project cost management, it is
the monitoring and controlling of the cost or budget to ensure no additional cost incurred
unless for those changes made which going through integrated change control process. For
the project quality management, the quality assurance will be performed by some certain
technique to ensure the quality is monitored and controlled. For the human resource
management, it is about the developing of human resource plan which will decide who
going to commit in the project. The plan can also monitor the team performance and make
sure what they do is compliance to project objectives. For project communication
management, it can be done through either verbal or written. The main objective of
communication is to acquiring, storing, transferring information related to the project. Firstly
the stakeholders will be identified. Then with the communication plan, all the information
will be share to authorized stakeholders. The benefit of the communication plan is to get
feedback from them so that change can be made earlier. For project risk management, the
risk can be identified by performing quality risk analysis using statistical tools. By doing this
risk analysis, the impact such as cost and time impact can be identified and reduce. During
the risk analysis, it is also required to do monitoring and controlling for the effectiveness of
project risk management. For project procurement management, it is dealing with the
procedure for procurement. The objective is to make sure the product or services needed to
complete the project can be sourcing from outside and in line with the project requirement.
The procurement also needs to be planned so that the incurred costs within the budgeted
cost.
In conclude, the framework is made up of 9 main success factors which are project
integration management, scope management, time management, cost management, quality
management, human resource management, communication management, procurement
management and risk management, each with a small group of sub success factor.
Based on Dicky (2011) in his research, there is a gap between the interest of the
project owner and contractor. The gaps exist in both the scope of work, cost and time. The
most dominant focus of the project owner and contractors are either fall in cost and time or
quality and time. The project owner will be willing to spend more to have the product
7
completed on time and well quality. For example, they need to pay more for the cost of rig
rental which is extremely costly. Lang (1990) describes that the project owner as being over
ambitious in spending in term to get the desired quality on time. This may lead to overruns
resulted from the inefficient way of working and the contractors made money at the project
owner expenses. For example, the construction was allowed begins before the overall
design is completed. This leads to the major changes over time and the project owner
ended up paying double of the original price. While contractors are more likely to put their
interest on profit and keeping business running. Zedan (1998) stated that the system of bid
evaluation dominated by the principle of acceptance of the lowest price. He also explained
that there are some contractors offer the lowest bid in order to get the award. This proves
that contractors are more concerned in securing many projects and to stay in the business.
They are more focus on the cost and time rather than quality and time. This contradicts with
the project owner interest.
2.2
Research Issues
The research encountered issues such as the lack of variation in measure of the importance
of success factors. The recent oil and gas projects share the set of basic factor or having a
routine of good practise which is transferable to most of the project environment. Another
issue is that the framework contains several main success factors which lead to project
success. However, the single factor is dispensable to success the certain project. The unique
of the project make some specific factor more important in different case.
2.3
Chapter Summary
This chapter review the theoretical framework and the gap exists in project management.
The framework is designed to be followed to achieve project success. This including the
project integration management, scope management, time management, cost management,
quality
management,
human
resource
management,
communication
management,
procurement management and risk management. While the gaps present during a project
execution was studied. It was found that, the communication gap is the major factor to
determine a project whether it can be success or not. The different role or stakeholders will
definitely have different interest to a project. To satisfy their interest, communication is the
crucial part to overcome this problem.
2.4
Chapter Conclusion
In conclusion, based on the literature review, the research found that, different project have
different critical success factor. However, there are some basic success factors required to
be followed so that the project able to go on smoothly.
3.0
METHODOLOGY
3.1
Introduction
This chapter will present and discuss on the adopted methodology for the study and the
method of data collection and analysis are being defined. The choice of the method is
choose based on appropriate (best practise of project management) and the most effective
method to generate and collect information for this research. The qualitative research
method is important which would most likely produce accurate and fast result of the
recognized problem. The methodology can be separated into several stages which are
processing, analysis and interpretation.
3.2
Research Outline
The research project can be divided into several steps. The step 1 is to conduct the
comprehensive literature review for critical success factors in an oil and gas project. Step 2
is to develop an evaluation conceptual model at which it comprises of some success factors
extracted from the best practise. This evaluation conceptual model will be used to design
the questionnaire sheet. Step 3 is to collect the data or opinion from experts by distributes
the questionnaire. Step 4 is to process and analyse the questionnaire form based on the
principal component analysis. The last step is to select the top 3 most effective factors to
lead a project to be success.
3.3
The research design and framework is based on descriptive approach at which the
questionnaire form that distributed to panellist was based on the theoretical framework of
this research. It is also known as the implementation of the all-inclusive literature review.
The questionnaire consists of 9 main success factors and each of the main factors comes
with several sub factors. The panellist will required to give their opinion on how the project
can be success based on their industrial experience. The 9 success factors were chosen
based on the best practise by referring to PMI (2008). The 9 success factors including
project integration management, scope management, time management, cost management,
quality
management,
human
resource
management,
communication
management,
11
The case study can be defined as an empirical research method that used to investigate a
contemporary phenomenon, focusing on the dynamics of the case, within its real life context
(Yin, 2003). In this research paper, the case study taken is SOGT project at which it has
become one of the significant success oil and gas project in Malaysia. The success factors of
SOGT project can be find out by some research question such as how the project completed
on time and why the project can be completed on time. It is focuses on contemporary
events and does not require control of behavioural events. Since the SOGT project owner is
Petronas, and the contractor is Samsung Engineering, it is close related to the questionnaire
panellist. The case study was taken from Samsung Engineering regarding their roles playing
in the SOGT project. The questionnaire approach used to trace the project owner opinion
while the case study approach studies the contractor opinion. This makes the researcher
able to compare both the project owner side opinion and contractor opinion regarding the
success factors. Other than that, case study able to overshadow the limitations of statisticsbased research methods like questionnaire. It helps to resolve the problem of getting
panellist to conduct the questionnaire from contractor side. In conclusion, Case study
method could effectively fill the void that exists due to the lack of a formal method of
conducting systematic research.
12
3.5
The study only makes relevance to the Petronas Carigali Company at which the
questionnaire paper only able to distribute to one company. Instead, to make the
generalisation for the whole oil and gas project, further research has to be conducted in
other company to confirm that the finding can be universally applied. Besides that, the time
constraint for the data collecting is another limitation at which the authors only able to
collect 20 valid feedback. Another limitation is that the panellist might not fully involve
throughout the whole project lifetime. In other words, they might be not expertise in project
management field instead they only professional in their technical field.
3.6
Chapter Summary
This chapter reviewed the methodology used to conduct the research. It also shows the
research design framework and the justification for the different type of methodology. Lastly,
the limitation and key assumptions encountered when conducting the research have also
been listed down.
13
4.0
4.1
DATA ANALYSIS
a.
Questionnaire
b.
Case study
Introduction
The primary data, in this project paper, were collected from employees of Petronas Carigali
Sabah Operation (PCSB SBO). The information includes their understanding, awareness and
experiences from previously executed projects in order to identify the factors that are critical
for the success of project. The reason for using questionnaire comes by the fact that project
management varies from project to project and also depends on the professional skills of
individuals who supervise projects.
For case study, SOGT project was taken as a part of this research. SOGT able to
overcome the challenge and completed on time was due to the early planning with the
fulfilling the criteria such as assigned the project team early, placed the right project delivery
strategy, implemented right managing risk plan, as well as used specific policies and
procedures to be match with the constraints of SOGT project. Samsung Engineering makes
use of project management body of knowledge (PMBOK) standards for SOGT project.
According to the PMBOK standard, the project management of process of a project involve
initiating process group, followed by planning process group, executing process group,
monitoring &controlling group and end with the closing process group.
14
4.2
Table 4.1
Descriptive component analysis for Project Integration Management
Component
Total
Analysis
Mean
Score
Number
In my organization, we use to develop Project Charter 33
10
3.3
Project Charter should be developed for each project
35
10
3.5
10
3.9
10
2.9
10
2.6
10
2.6
10
3.3
35
3.5
0.45
0.671
39
3.9
0.09
0.30
29
2.9
1.49
1.221
26
2.6
0.44
0.663
26
2.6
1.05
1.025
33
3.3
0.41
0.64
This analysis indicates top three critical factors from the knowledge area of Project
Integration Management. The factors are:
15
b.
Table 4.3
Descriptive component analysis for Project Scope Management
Component
Total
Analysis
Score
Number
Collecting the requirements of stakeholders is not 22
10
important
Scope need not be established prior to of the project
Mean
2.2
24
10
2.4
10
3.2
10
3.9
10
2.0
10
3.6
10
2.8
28
24
2.4
1.84
1.356
32
3.2
0.76
0.872
39
3.9
0.40
0.632
20
2.0
0.60
0.775
36
3.6
0.36
0.60
28
2.8
0.96
0.980
16
This analysis indicates top three critical factors from the knowledge area of Project Scope
Management. The factors are:
1. I always prefer to breakdown the scope into specific doable activities Total of 39
points.
2. I tend to accept minor variations to the project scope if they are not having any
major effect on the project Total of 36 points.
3. Scope acceptance criteria can be developed as the project progresses Total of 32
points.
c.
Table 4.5
Descriptive component analysis for Project Time Management
Component
Total
Analysis
Score
Number
All of the activities involved in a project must be 32
10
sequenced
Mean
3.2
10
3.5
10
3.4
28
10
2.8
10
4.4
10
3.6
Ranking
5
35
3.5
1.25
1.118
34
3.4
0.44
0.663
28
2.8
0.76
0.872
44
4.4
0.44
0.663
17
36
3.6
1.04
1.020
This analysis indicates top three critical factors from the knowledge area of Project Time
Management. The factors are:
1. Developing schedule is a good practice for monitoring projects progress Total of
44 points.
2. Unexpected changes can be accommodated by deploying additional resources
leaving the project schedule unchanged Total of 36 points.
3. An activity can be completed at the given time if the required resources are readily
available Total of 35 points.
d.
Table 4.7
Descriptive component analysis for Project Cost Management
Component
Total
Analysis
Score
Number
Resource planning is an essential part of project cost 43
10
management
Mean
4.3
10
2.2
10
3.5
10
4.0
Ranking
1
22
2.2
0.69
0.831
35
3.5
1.45
1.204
40
4.0
1.00
1.000
This analysis indicates top three critical factors from the knowledge area of Project Cost
Management. The factors are:
1. Resource planning is an essential part of project cost management Total of 43
points.
18
e.
Table 4.9
Descriptive component analysis for Project Quality Management
Component
Total
Analysis
Score
Number
My organization has a clear quality policy and quality 36
10
management system
Mean
3.6
10
4.0
10
1.9
40
4.0
0.56
0.748
19
1.9
0.49
0.700
This analysis indicates top three critical factors from the knowledge area of Project Quality
Management. The factors are:
1. We use to monitor overall project performance on a regular basis to ensure that the
project will satisfy the relevant quality standards Total of 40 points.
2. My organization has a clear quality policy and quality management system Total of
36 points.
3. Quality control is not required if the output is visibly acceptable Total of 19 points.
19
f.
Table 4.11 Descriptive component analysis for Project Human Resource Management
Component
Total
Analysis
Mean
Score
Number
My organizations defined Human Resource Plan is 28
10
2.8
readily used as Human Resource Management Plan
for the projects
I have a fixed project team that is used for all types 26
of projects
10
2.6
10
3.5
10
3.7
10
2.6
26
2.6
0.64
0.800
35
3.5
0.25
0.500
37
3.7
0.61
0.781
26
2.6
1.44
1.200
This analysis indicates top three critical factors from the knowledge area of Project Human
Resources Management. The factors are:
1. Project teams performance should be evaluated once the project is complete Total
of 37 points.
2. Training the project team always helps in improving the performance of project
execution Total of 35 points.
3. My organizations defined Human Resource Plan is readily used as Human Resource
Management Plan for the projects Total of 28 points.
20
g.
10
2.4
10
2.2
10
1.9
10
3.5
10
3.4
10
3.1
10
2.0
20
24
2.4
1.04
1.020
22
2.2
0.76
0.872
19
1.9
0.49
0.700
35
3.5
0.89
0.943
34
3.4
0.64
0.800
31
3.1
0.69
0.831
20
2.0
0.80
0.894
This analysis indicates top three critical factors from the knowledge area of Project
Communication Management. The factors are:
21
h.
Mean
1.7
10
3.8
10
3.9
40
10
4.0
40
10
4.0
10
2.1
10
3.8
Ranking
7
38
3.8
0.56
0.748
39
3.9
0.36
0.600
40
4.0
0.40
0.632
40
4.0
0.40
0.632
21
2.1
0.49
0.700
38
3.8
0.56
0.748
22
This analysis indicates top three critical factors from the knowledge area of Project Risk
Management. The factors are:
1. I always devise an action plan to handle crucial risks Total of 40 points.
2. I use my experience to identify potential risks Total of 40 points.
3. I use to measure the probability and consequences of risks and estimate their
implications for project objectives Total of 39 points.
i.
25
10
2.5
43
10
4.3
10
4.1
10
2.2
10
2.3
23
25
2.5
0.65
0.806
43
4.3
0.41
0.640
41
4.1
0.29
0.539
22
2.2
1.36
1.166
23
2.3
0.61
0.781
23
This analysis indicates top three critical factors from the knowledge area of Project
Procurement Management. The factors are:
1. Procurement planning is very crucial to get a timely availability of required materials
Total of 43 points.
2. We make formal contract with each vendor Total of 43 points.
3. We always obtain quotations, and ask for bids and offers to procure Total of 41
points.
24
risk
management,
communication
management
and
human
resource
i.
Combined the project teams from the SOGT project and other projects to minimize
interfacing discrepancies, which are common when dealing with multiple adjacent
projects during the 11 months hiatus period.
ii.
iii.
Integrated the construction workforce with the facilitys operational staff to form a
task force that allowed uninterrupted operations of the adjacent facilities during the
construction period and during the pre-commissioning and commissioning phases.
26
4.3
Summary of Findings
a.
Questionnaire
Finally, factor analysis run on these 9 variables and identified their respective importance on
the basis of percentage factor from the total accumulate point based on every questions in
each categories as follows:
Component
Cost
Percentage Factor %
70.00
Time
69.67
Risk
66.57
Procurement
65.67
Quality
63.33
Integration
63.14
HR
60.80
Scope
57.43
Communication
55.75
Above data analysis indicates that Human Resource, Scope and Communication were
found to be least important because their respective percentage factor as per above table.
While Cost was found to be the most important factor with a percentage of 70.00% suited
with current world crude oil price. Then comes Time Management with percentage factor
69.67%. Next comes Risk Management with percentage factor of 66.57% followed by
Procurement Management with percentage factor 65.67%. At the end comes Quality
Management and Integration Management with percentage factor 63.33% and 63.14%
respectively.
b.
Case Study
27
4.4
From the previous research finding, it was found that the risk and resource planning is the
top concern for every project of oil and gas industry. These 2 factors became the critical
success factors for every project. However, as mentioned before, each project holds the
different scope of work, budget, time constraint, desirable quality and is unique. So, the
requirements or project success factors will also be different. The theoretical framework in
this research is made up of 9 main success factors which are project integration
management,
scope
management,
time
management,
cost
management,
quality
Chapter Conclusion
In conclusion, from both the questionnaire survey and case study of oil and gas related
project, it was found that the most important critical success factors are cost management,
time
management,
risk
management,
human
communication.
28
resource
management
as
well
as
5.0
CONCLUSION
5.1
Introduction
In the effort to conduct this research, there are 2 main objectives have been achieved and
the results obtained are satisfactory. This study was completed using modern methodology
including literature review, questionnaire and case studies.
The first objective in this study is to identify the critical success factors which have to
be concerned from the initiating phase until the closing phase. It is achieved by distribute
the questionnaire survey form with a list of success factor selection. In this research, the
data collected were ranked to shows the degree of importance of a success factor. At the
end of the research, the top 3 ranking of the success factor were found out. While for the
case study, SOGT project was chosen and the success factors were identified through the
company portfolio.
The second objective in this study is to compare the critical success factor from the
literature review, which are identified by previous researcher from different oil and gas
project. The author assume that the overlapping success factors will be the critical success
factors for every project from previously until now and maybe in the future, while for those
new added critical success factor, it is either due to the unique of the oil and gas project or
due to the project management requirement nowadays.
5.2
Although the research was lack of variation in measure of the importance of success factors,
but with the basic success factor as the design framework used in the questionnaire, the
critical factor can be found out. The higher ranking means higher importance of success
factor. In this research, the top 3 rank of success factor are cost, time, and risk
management. While for the other success factor like procurement, scope, integration,
communication, human resource and quality management are important as well to make
sure the project success. Both of them were required and there is no independent factor
that makes project to success.
29
5.3
The research encountered time constraint to complete. The research questionnaire was
unable to distribute to more panellist. Another problem is that the panellist who attended
the survey has only average experience in the industry. To solve the problem, more time is
required and more experienced worker needed for conducting the research survey to get
other critical success factor that are not listed in the paper. The authors also suggested that
the questionnaire survey form used to find out the critical success factors should be put it
online so that other experiences worker from other oil and gas project can give contribution
but not only fixed for only one company opinion.
5.4
Implications
30
The study only makes relevance to the Petronas Carigali Company at which the
questionnaire paper only able to distribute to one company. Instead, to make the
generalisation for the whole oil and gas project, further research has to be conducted in
other company to confirm that the finding can be universally applied. Besides that, the time
constraint for the data collecting is another limitation at which the authors only able to
collect 20 valid feedback. Another limitation is that the panellist might not fully involve
throughout the whole project lifetime. In other words, they might be not expertise in project
management field instead they only professional in their technical field.
5.6
The finding of the research is applicable for any other industry. This is because it was
designed based on the basis success factor of the project. All of the factors were extracted
out from the PMBOK standard at which every phases of the project from initiating to closing
give contribution to the theoretical framework design. The ranking part of the finding has to
be carefully used for other project other than oil and gas. This is because for other type of
industry, the cost might not be the major factor of success. The oil and gas project involve
huge cost, so, the cost management is extra important to make the project to be success.
5.7
The research can be further conducted in term of questionnaire design. It should be more
internationally. This can be solved by putting it online for everyone to view and give their
precious opinion. Other than that, the critical success factor for oil and gas project can be
further categorized according to downstream, midstream and upstream. Different stream
has different constrains and factors to be taken into account.
31
5.8
Chapter Conclusions
This chapter reviewed the theory, practise, policy and methodology used to in this research.
This chapter also shows how the authors deal with the research issues and questions. Lastly,
some limitations for this research were listed out for future improvement.
32
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Cheng Wei Yet was born in Johor, Malaysia, on 27th December 1992. He got
his Bachelor of Science in Geology (hons.) degree from Faculty of science and
Natural Resources, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia on year 2015.
Currently he is full time postgraduate student studying Master of
Engineering in Oil and Gas at Universiti Malaysia Sabah. Previously he works
as trainee reservoir geologist for Carigali Hess Operating Company (CHOC) &
Malaysia Thailand Joint Authority (MTJA). Cheng Wei Yet is a member of the
following professional bodies: Institute of Geology Malaysia (IGM).
Authors formal
photo
33
REFERENCES
Ahmad, T. 2015. An Integrated Model for Auditing Construction Projects: A Case Study of Oil
and Gas projects in Iran. M.A.SC. Thesis. University of Ottawa, Canada.
Ahmed, Mohammad, Project Management: Factors Critical for Success of Projects in Oil &
Gas
Sector
of
Kuwait
(December
25,
2011).
Available
at
SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2061014 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2061014
Alam GM, Khalifa MTB (2009). The impact of introducing a business marketing approach to
education: A study on private HE in Bangladesh. African Journal of Business
34
PMI. 2008. A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMI Guide). Ed 4.
Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
Sabah Oil and Gas Terminal, Sabah. (n.d.). Retrieved 20 November 2015, from
http://www.hydrocarbons-technology.com/projects/sabah-terminal/
Shen, Qiping and Liu, Guiwen. 2003. Critical Succcess Factors for Value Management
Studies in Construction. J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt.,ASCE, 129(5): 485-491
Spinner M. P. (1997). Project Management Principles and Practices, USA
Tserng, H. P. and Lin, Y. C. 2004. Developing an Activity-based Knowledge Management
System for Contraction Projects. Journal of Automation in Construction, Vol. 13,
pp.781-802.
Yin,R.K., 2003, Case study research : Design and Methods, Sage Publications.
Zedan Hatush, M. S. 1998. Contractor Selection Using Multi criteria Utility Theory: An
Addictive Model. Building and Environment. 33 (2-3): 105 - 115.
35
APPENDIX
36