Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Ana Pvoa
Ana Pvoa
Overview
Objective
Flexible Processing Systems
Problems & Challenges
Systems Approach
Processes, Resources, Operating Conditions
Generic Problems Representations
Scheduling
Design
Supply Chains
Conclusions & Future Work
Objective
Products
Low Volumes
Batch and Semi-
Continuous
Operations
Multipurpose
Resources
Raw Materials
Products
RV1
RV1
ST1
R2
Product A
RD1
RD2
RV2
FT1
RV2
RD3
Product B
RD1
D1
RV1
RV1
RD2
D2
RD2
RV2
Product C
RV2
RD3
Campaign 1
Campaign 2
Ana Pvoa
Production Planning
Resources Requirements in
New Plants /Existing Plants
Productions Control
Ana Pvoa
Chemical
Oil/Gas
Pharma/Fine
Metals
Diversity of Applications
Complex Production Processes
Improvement of Processes Efficiency
Client Satisfaction
Enviro
Food
Decision
Support
Systems
Costs Reduction
Ana Pvoa
supply chains?
SYSTEMS APPROCH
OPTIMIZATION...
Ana Pvoa
The Model
Develop the model for the problem;
Parameters definition
Sets definition
Variables definition
Binary (ex. Use or not the resource ?)
Continuous (ex. Batch sizes ?)
Constraints definitions
Objective definition
Ana Pvoa
Solution Methods
Heuristics generic rules used to
alternatives (FIFO, ).
Meta-Heuristics
algorithms (e.g.
annealing, Tabu search, Ant colony, ).
evaluate
simulate
Constraint Programming
Ana Pvoa
10
Key Components
Tasks activities that transform the materials:
Processing
Storage
Transport
Resources:
r
Processing and storage equipments,
Transport
Man-power
Utilities
Time :
External - Production versus external demand
Internal Production Planning & Scheduling
Ana Pvoa
11
Treatment of time
The activities (tasks) must occur such that
Continuous Time
Discrete Time
Slot 1
1
0
T-2
T-1
T
H
Slot 2
Slot T-2
T-2
Slot T-1
T-1
T
H
Ana Pvoa
12
Problems Representation
Ana Pvoa
13
(Pantelides, 2004)
Ana Pvoa
14
Scheduling
Given:
Process description
Plant flow-sheet
Resources suitability tasks / materials
Operating constraints
Production demands
Costs/Values
Times of operation
Determine:
Optimal operation: scheduling
So as to:
Optimize an objective function
Min. Delays / Max. Prod./ Min Makespan
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
Ana Pvoa
15
Process Description
State-Task Network, STN
States
A
Mixture 1
Tasks
Reactions
80%
3h
C
2h
P1
20%
Add
75%
25%
Mixture 2
1h
P2
Ana Pvoa
16
Mixture 1
Tasks
Reaction
80%
3h
320 t
C
400t
2h
P1
20%
Add
75%
600t
25%
Mixture 2
1h
P2
125 t
1450t
Global Model
Process
Multipurpose Resources
Time representation
Operating Costs
Operating modes
Operating constraints
Demand
Ana Pvoa
17
MILP
Problem
Ana Pvoa
18
Scheduling
Batch de P2
Batch de P1
Answer : 26 hours
(adapted, Shah, 2003)
Ana Pvoa
19
STN Restrictions
Tasks are always associated to materials that
suffer transformation.
Tasks associated to a dingle equipment.
Each resource is treated independently and non
uniformly
Generalizations
constraints
implies
the
addition
of
Ana Pvoa
20
10
(Pantelides, 1994)
Resources
Tasks
21
(Pantelides, 1994)
Reactor
B
A
Reaction A
Ana Pvoa
Reaction
B with cleaning
Cleaning
Reactor clean
Reactor dirty
Reaction
Ana Pvoa
22
11
MaxPR = Rr ,H +1 Rs,0 . vr + r ,t . vr
t
rRP
s.t.
s.t.
t
W
1 j ,t = 1,...,H
0 S st C s
0 Rrt Rrtmax
r , t = 1,..., H
s , t = 1,..., H
0 U ut U umax
Vkrmin N kt kt N kt Vkrmax
i, j Ki , t = 1,..., H
u, t = 1,..., H
U ut = ( uiWijt + ui Bijt )
i
sSP
k , r PEk , t = 1,..., H
Rr ,t = R
+
( kr N k ,t + kr k ,t ) + rt
s,t 1
k =0
u , t = 1,..., H
r , t = 1,...,H + 1
jki
s , t = 1,...,H + 1
Rrt , N kt , kt , rt
Ana Pvoa
23
S plitte r
Digester
S tream 4
Four Digesters
operating in batch mode
(D3, D4, D5 e D6)
S tream 2
S tream 1
He a t E xcha nge r
Ana Pvoa
24
12
Process:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Chip filling;
Acid filling
Heating ( 55C to 130C)
Cooking
Degasification (high & low pressure)
Blowing
Ana Pvoa
25
Ana Pvoa
26
13
S1
D4
S1
D5
D6
S1
S1
R2
R3
k=1
S2
k=2
S3
k=3-10
k=1
S2
k=2
S3
k=3-10
k=1
S2
k=2
S3
k=3-10
k=1
S2
k=2
S3
k=3-10
S8
S8
S8
S8
D3
k=14
S11
k=13
S10
k=12
S9
k=11
D4
k=14
S11
k=13
S10
k=12
S9
k=11
D5
k=14
S11
k=13
S10
k=12
S9
k=11
D6
k=13
S11
k=13
S10
k=12
S9
k=11
R6
R4
R5
27
H 0 (3,3)
S3
Ana Pvoa
H 1 (3,3)
H 1 (4,3)
S5
H 0 (3 ,4 )
H 1 (5,3)
H 1 (3,4)
S6
H 0 (3 ,5 )
H 1 (6,3)
S7
H 0 (3 ,6 )
H 1 (3,6)
H 1 (3,4)
S5
H 0 (4 ,3 )
H 1 (4,3)
H 1 (5,4)
S6
H 0 (4 ,5 )
H 1 (6,4)
S4
H 1 (3,5)
S8
D3
H 0 (4,4)
S3
D4
D5
H 1 (4,4)
S4
H 1 (4,5)
S7
H 0 (4 ,6 )
H 1 (4,6)
H 1 (3,5)
S5
H 0 (5 ,3 )
H 1 (5,3)
H 1 (4,5)
S6
H 0 (5 ,4 )
S4
H 1 (5,4)
H 0 (5,5)
S3
D6
S8
S8
H 1 (5,5)
H 1 (6,5)
S7
H 0 (5 ,6 )
H 1 (5,6)
H 1 (3,6)
H 1 (6,3)
S5
H 0 (6 ,3 )
H 1 (4,6)
S6
H 0 (6 ,4 )
H 1 (5,6)
S7
H 0 (6 ,5 )
S4
H 1 (6,4)
S8
S3
H 0 (6,6)
H 1 (6,5)
H 1 (6,6)
Ana Pvoa
28
14
Optimal Sequence
13 t/h
14 t/h
Optimal Sequence
D3-D4-D5-D6
D3-D6-D4-D5
605
595
Scenarios Study
Ana Pvoa
29
Acid filling
Steam sharing
Cooking
HP Degassing
LP Degassing
Blowing
D6
D5
D4
D3
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
Time (min)
Ana Pvoa
30
15
BUT IS MISSING .
Dynamic Scheduling treatment
Uncertainty study
Explore more efficient solution methods complex
problems
Ana Pvoa
31
Ana Pvoa
32
Design / Retrofit
Given:
Process Description
Plant Superstructure : Equipment & Topology
Equipment Suitability Tasks/Materials
Operational constraints
Demands
Operating & Investment Costs/Values
Operation times
Determine:
Plant design : Equipment & Topology
Optimal Operation : scheduling
So as to:
Optimize and Objective Function
Min. Costs / Max. Profit
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
16
Design / Retrofit
T1
2h
0.6
S3
0.6
S4
T2
S6
S1/V1
T3
0.4
0.4
4h
2h
S2
T4
S5
T1/R1
S2/V2
T4/R3
T2/R1
S6/V6
S5/V5
T3/R3
S4/V4
V2
Precise representation of :
V5
R1
R1
R3
V4
- all transfers
- all material locations
- any storage policies
V6
Equipment-Process Modeling
Ana Pvoa
33
R1_Sujo_S3
Limpeza
T1
C_Limpa
C_Suja
tr_S3
R1_Limpo
tr_S4
R1_Sujo_S4
T2
tr_gua
Representing:
-precedence constraints
-sequence dependencies
-cleaning requirements
Ana Pvoa
34
17
Design - Modeling
Process Networks
products recipes (ex. make A)
ancillary operations (ex. clean)
Equipment Network
- Units
- Connections
Flowsheet
(Barbosa-Pvoa, 1994)
STN
Equipment / Process
Units / Tasks-States (Suitability)
Connections / States
mSTN
*
Operational Pre-conditions
- Equipment States
- Product precedence orders
- Cleaning needs
eSTN
*
- generated automatically
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
Model Characteristics
Ana Pvoa
35
Objective
Function
MILP
Problem
Ana Pvoa
36
18
Retrofit: Example
(Barbosa-Pvoa, 1994)
Retrofit: Example
Ana Pvoa
37
(Barbosa-Pvoa, 1994)
RML
0.2
RMP
0.5
R_INTA
0.5
RMD
0.1
0.33
0.2
0.34
10 h
0.8
5h
0.4
SEP_A
R_INTB
IMPB
INTA
WASH_B
INTC
R_INTC 10 h
0.8
0.9
0.2
0.33
0.2
0.1
0.2
WA
WB
15 h
10 h
IMPA
RMW
IMPC
0.1
PROC
0.9
0.9
0.1
WASH_C
5h
WC
Ana Pvoa
38
19
Retrofit: Example
(Barbosa-Pvoa, 1994)
Superstructure Flowsheet
(in black existing plant in red possible additions)
F_RMA
RC1
F_RML
F_RMP
F_RMW
F_RMD
RA1
RC2
VB1
Sep1
RA2
VA1
Sep2
RC3
WB1
RA3
RB1
WC1
VwA
VB2
RC4
RA4
RA5
Sep3
VA2
WB2
RC5
RB2
WC2
VwB
VwC
VC2
VC1
Retrofit: Example
Ana Pvoa
39
(Barbosa-Pvoa, 1994)
Optimal Structure
F_RMA
RC1
F_RML
F_RMP
F_RMW
F_RMD
F_RMD
RA1
VB1
Sep1
RA2
VA1
VwA
RC2
RC3
WB1
RB1
WC1
RC4
RC5
VwB
VwC
VC2
VC1
Ana Pvoa
40
20
Retrofit: Example
R_INTA
100
IMPA
100
Reactor RA1
Reactor RA2
Filter WB
Reactor RC1
Reactor RC2
Reactor RC3
Reactor RC4
Reactor RC5
Filter WC
250
Tank VB1
SEP_A
200
R_INTA
78
IMPA
78
R_INTA
100
R_INTA
100
SEP_A
178
SEP_A
200
R_INTB
300
Reactor RB
Tank VA1
R_INTA
100
R_INTA
100
SEP_A
Separator Sep1
(Barbosa-Pvoa, 1994)
R_INTB
R_INTB
R_INTB
R_INTB
300
300
300
160
WASH_B
WASH_B
WASH_B
WASH_B
WASH_B
375
375
350
375
200
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
100
100
30
100
100
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
30
100
30
30
100
100
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
100
100
100
100
100
100
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
100
100
100
100
100
100
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
R_INTC
230
230
230
230
230
230
WASH_C WASH_C WASH_C WASH_C WASH_C WASH_C WASH_C WASH_C WASH_C WASH_C WASH_C WASH_C
267
222
400
222
400
222
400
222
400
222
367
333
0
150
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Ana Pvoa
41
Plants Topology
Multipurpose Resources
Operating Constraints
Discrete & Continuous Capacities
Cyclic & Short Term Operation
Time
Discrete (Pinto, Barbosa-Pvoa e Novais, 2005)
Continuous (Castro, Barbosa-Pvoa e Novais, 2005)
Ana Pvoa
42
21
Ana Pvoa
43
Ana Pvoa
44
Supply Chain
Optimization
Distribution
Production
Integration
Demand
Supply
Return
22
Optimization Opportunities
The supply chains are difficult to understand
Decisions are frequently based on common
sense
Ana Pvoa
45
Supply Chains
Previous representations can be extended
Models
Detailed and able to capture interactions
Deal with uncertainty
Dynamic & Flexible
Extensible
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
Ana Pvoa
46
23
TOPOLOGY
Chain Structure
Transportation Network
OPERATION
Model
(MILP)
ChainSTN
Tasks
Materials flows
MARKET ASPECTS
Supply/Demand
Constraints Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
Ana Pvoa
47
Final
IP1
IP2
IP3
Europe
AP
BC1
.
.
.
IP4
Europe
WH1
PC
SC
EC
WSH1
I1
I3
WH2
SP
I2
BC2
Ii
Africa
WSH2
Distribution Sites
WH3
Europe
Burning Centers
Forward flows
(white/ final Products)
Reverse flows
(Recycle, Remanufacturing, Burning)
Ana Pvoa
48
24
Main Operations
Production intermediate medicines production (not for sale)
involves essentially operations like:
sterilization,
components calibration,
mixing, etc.
Customization considers operations as:
filling,
blistering,
packing, etc.
Distribution and Supply considers operations as:
storing,
distribution.
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
Ana Pvoa
49
I1
BF4
I2
BF2
RF2
BF3
RF3
BC 2
BF3
RF3
BF4
RF4
I1
BFi
BF4
RF4
BF1
RF1
BF2
RF2
I2
RFi
BFi
Ws
RC RM
Transporte
BF3
RF3
I3
BFi
RFi
Valncia-U
I 1 Produo
Scenario 1 no recover,
Burning (SC1)
I3
BC 1
BF1
RF1
RFi
BF4
RF4
Scenario 2 recover,
without minimums (SC2)
with minimums (SC3)
Transporte
Mercado
(Outras Indstrias)
BC 1
BC 2
Ana Pvoa
50
25
G lo b a l P la n n in g P ro fit
C a se I - 5% P rio r T rim e stre
18500
1 8 09 3
18000
17500
18 0 73
17 8 8 2
1 77 1 3
1 7 83 7
1 7 2 96
17000
16500
S c1
S c2a
S c2b
O p e ra tio n a l S c e n a rio s
Sc2a
Sc2b
Costs
-200000
-400000
-600000
-800000
Ana Pvoa
51
Formulao:
IP1
IP2
Costumizao:
PF1, EECF1,
EF1
PF2,
EECF2
Scheduling 5 days
Ana Pvoa
52
26
Utilidade 1
Electricidade
Utilidade 2
gua
5%
S1 57%
S2
38%
S1 25%
Diluio, T199% S3
(1 dia)
S2
1%
WT1
75%
Super-estructure
99%
Secagem, T2
S4
(2 dias)
1%
WT2
+ Environmental data
Simplified super-structure
Optimal Network
27
Operation
Supply Chains
(Goetschalckx et al. 2002, Shah, 2004)
Ana Pvoa
56
28
mSTNs eSTNs
RTNs
Resources
Characteristics
Products demands
Operational
Characteristics
Objectives
Structural / Operational
Topological
Characteristics
Economic Parameters
Flexible Systems
ChainNet
Design
+
Retrofit
+
Scheduling
Mathematical
Formulation
Conclusions
Design & Scheduling
Detailed models
Solutions of some real cases
There is space for more
Supply Chains
Optimization
Possible Solution
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
Ana Pvoa
58
29
Future
Fill the GAP between research & its application
Explore solution methods more efficiently :
Hybrid methods
Heuristics + MILPs
Meta-Heuristics + MILPS
Constraint Programming + MILPs
Integrated different decision levels
Explore environmental impacts
Uncertainty
Ana Pvoa
59
Ana Pvoa
60
Thanks
Augusto Novais, INETI
Henrique Matos, DEQB, IST
PhDs
Carlos Vieira, MSc
Cristina Amaro, MSc
Elisa Cunha, PhD
Isabel Salema, MSc
Joaquim Duque
Marta Gomes, MSc
Pedro Castro, PhD
Susana Relvas
Tnia Pinto, MSc
MScs
Ana Mestre
Fernando Miranda, MSc
Joo Teles
Jos Matos, MSc
Nuno Sade, MSc
Pedro Oliveira
Ricardo Mateus, MSc
Sofia Pinheiro, MSc
Vernica Becken
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
30
Ana Pvoa
61
References
Amaro, C, e A.P.F.D. Barbosa-Pvoa (2006), Close Loops Supply Chains: Managing Product Recovery Portfolios,
Computer Aided Chemical Engineering , Vol. 21B, Editores W. Marquardt e C. Pantelides, Elsevier, 1875-1880.
Amaro, C., A.P.F.D. Barbosa-Pvoa (2004), Optimal Supply Chain Operation A Discrete Model Formulation,
Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Vol. 18, Editores A. Barbosa-Pvoa e H. Matos, Elsevier, 877-883.
Barbosa-Pvoa, A. P. F. D. (2006), A Critical Review on the Design and Retrofit of Batch Plants, em publicao,
Computers and Chemical Engineering (Comp. Chem Engng).
Barbosa-Pvoa, A.P.F.D., R. Mateus e A.Q. Novais (2002), Optimal Design and Layout of Industrial Facilities: A
Simultaneous Approach, Industrial Eng. and Chem. Res, 41, 15, 3601-3609.
Barbosa-Pvoa, A.P.F.D., R. Mateus e A.Q. Novais (2002), Optimal Design and Layout of Industrial Facilities: An
Application to Multipurpose Batch Plants Industrial Eng. and Chem. Res, 41, 15, 3610-3620.
Barbosa-Pvoa, A.P.F.D. e S. Macchietto (1997). Design of Multipurpose Batch Plants with Operational PreConditions. Revista de Investigao Operacional, 2,17, 113-136.
Barbosa-Povoa, A. P., & Macchietto, S. (1994a). Detailed Design of Multipurpose Batch Plants. Computers &
Barbosa-Povoa, A. P. (1994). Detailed Design & Retrofit of Multipurpose Batch Plants. PhD, University of London.
Chase, R. B., F. R. Jacobs e N. J. Aquilano (2005). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage with
Global Cases, 11 edio, McGrawHill/Irwin.
Castro, P., A. P. F. D. Barbosa-Pvoa, e A. Q. Novais (2005), Simultaneous Synthesis, Design and Scheduling of
Multipurpose Plants using RTN-based Continuous-time Formulations, Industrial Eng. and Chem. Res. 44, 343-357.
Castro, P., A. P. F. D. Barbosa-Pvoa e H. Matos (2003), Optimal Periodic Scheduling of Batch Plants using RTNbased Discrete and Continuous Time: a Case Study Approach, Industrial Eng. and Chem. Res.,42, 3346-3360.
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
Ana Pvoa
62
31
References
Castro, P., H. Matos e A. P. F. D. Barbosa-Pvoa (2002), Dynamic Modelling, Scheduling of an Industrial Batch
System, Comp. Chem. Eng., 26, 671-686
Castro, P., A. P. F. D. Barbosa-Pvoa e H. Matos (2001), An improved RTN continuous-time formulation for the
short-term scheduling of multipurpose batch plants, Industrial Eng. and Chem. Res., 40, 2059-2068.
Crooks, C., (1992) Synthesis of Operating Procedures for Chemical Plants. PhD Thesis, Imperial College of Science
Technology and Medicien, University of London.
Duque, J, A.P.F.D. Barbosa-Pvoa e A.Q. Novais (2006), Case-Study of a Regional Network for the Recovery of
Hazardous Materials, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering , Vol. 21B, Editores W. Marquardt e C. Pantelides,
Elsevier, 1797-1792.
Duque, J., A.P.F.D. Barbosa-Pvoa e A.Q. Novais (2005), Synthesis and Optimisation of the Recovery Route for
Residual Products with Uncertain Product Demands, em publicao no Computers and Operational Reserach,
disponvel na web desde Julho 2005.
Dedopoulos, I.T. and N. Shah (1995), Preventive Maintenance Policy Optimisation for Multipurpose Plant
Equipment, Comput. chem. Engng, S19, S693-S698.
Floudas, C. A., e Lin, X. (2004), Continuous versus Discrete time formulations approaches for scheduling of
chemical processes, Comp. Chem. Engng., 28, 2109-2129.
Giannellos, M.F., e Giorgiadis, M.C. (2002). A simples continuous time formulation for short term scheduling of
multipurpose batch plants, Ind. Engn. Chem. Res., 41, 2178-2184.
Goetschalckx, M., C.J. Vidal and K. Dogan, 2002, Modelling and design of global logistics systems:A review of
integrated strategic and tactical models and design algorithms, European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR),
143, 1-18.
Grossmann, I.E. (2005), Entreprise-Wide Optimization: A new frontriei in Process Systems Engineering, AICHe
Journal, 1846-1857.
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
Ana Pvoa
63
References
Ierapetritou, M. G.; Floudas, C. A.(1998) Effective Continuous-Time Formulation for Short-Term Multipurpose
Batch Processes, Ind. Engng. Chem. Res., 37, 4341.
Janak, S.L, Lin, X., e Floudas, C.A. (2004) Enhanced Continuous time unit specific event based formulation for
short term scheduling of multipurpose batch processes: resource constraints and mixed storage policies. Ind.
Eng. Chem Res., 44, 426.
Kondili, E., Pantelides, C.C., Sargent, R. W. (1993), A General Algorithm for short-term scheduling of batch
operations, Comp. Chem. Engn., 2, 211-227.
Lin & Floudas, C. A. (2001), Design and Scheduling of multipurpose batch plants via an effective continuous time
formulation, Comp. Chem. Engn. 25, 665-674.
Maravelias, C. T., e Grossmann, I.E. (2003) New general continuous time state-task network formulation for short
term scheduling of multipurpose batch plants, Ind. Engn. Chem Res, 42, 3056-3074.
Mendez, C., Cerda, J., Grossmann, I, Harjunskoski, I., Fahl, M. (2006), State of the Review of Optimisation
Methods for Short-Term Scheduling of Batch Processes, Computers & Chem. Engn., 30. 6/7, 913-946.
Pantelides, C.C. (2004), Unified Frameworks for Optimal Process Planning and Scheduling, FOCPO, USA.
Papageorgaki, S. and Reklaitis, G. V. (1990). Optimal Design of Multipurpose Batch Plants 1.Problem
Formulation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 29, 10, 2054-2062.
Papageorgiou, L.G. and C.C. Pantelides, (1996) Optimal Campaign Planning/Scheduling of Multipurpose
Batch/Semicontinuous Plants. 1. Mathematical Formulation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35, 488-509.
Pinto, T., A.P.F.D. Barbosa-Pvoa e A.Q. Novais (2005), Optimal Design and Retrofit of Batch Plant with a Periodic
Mode of Operation, Comp. Chem. Engng, 29, 1293-1304.
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
Ana Pvoa
64
32
References
Pinto, T., A.P.F.D. Barbosa-Pvoa e A.Q. Novais (2003), Optimal Design of Heat-Integrated Multipurpose Batch
Facilities with Economic savings in Utilities: A Mixed Integer Mathematical Formulation, Annals of Operations
Research, 120,201-230.
Reklaitis, G. V. (1989). Progress and Issues in Computer Aided Batch Process Design., Third International
Schilling, G. and Pantelides, C. (1996). A Simple Continuous-Time Process Scheduling Formulation and a Novel
Solution Algorithm. Comp. Chem. Eng., 20, S1221-S1226.
Shah, N (2004), Process Industries Supply Chains: Advances and Challenges, Computer-Aided Chemical
Engineering, 18, Edts. A. Barbosa-Pvoa and H. Matos, Elsevier, 123- 138.
Shah, N. (2003), Making things better: systems approaches for improved processes and supply chains Inaugural
Lecture, Imperial College, London
Shah, N., (1998), Single and Multisite Planning and Scheduling: Current Sytatus and Future Challenges. In Third
Shah, N. , C.C. Pantelides and R.W.H. Sargent (1993) Optimal Periodic Scheduling of Multipurpouse Batch Plants.
Annals of Operations Research, 42, 193-228.
Slack, N, Chambers, S., Harrison, A., Johnston, R. (1995), Operations Management, Pitman Publishing, London,
U.K.
Sundaramoorthy, A.; Karimi,(2005) I.A. A simpler better slot-based continuous-time formulation for short-term
scheduling in multipurpose batch plants. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60, 2679.
Zhang, X., e Sargent, R.W. (1996) The Optimal Operation of Mixed Production Facilities a general formulations
and some approaches for the solution, Computers & Chem Engn., 20. 897-904.
Iberian Conference in Optimization, Coimbra, Nov. 2006,
Ana Pvoa
65
33