Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Schoenberg's
, Op. 46
January 5, 2011
Introduction
Arnold Schoenberg's contributions to the elds of music theory and music composition remain studied, taught, and celebrated. His success is hardly surprising,
as the introduction of his serial technique and practice has been a pillar of modernist composition throughout the greater part of the 20th century. Fueled by
the scientic advances, the beginning of the 20th century birthed many proposals for new philosophies, approaches, and structures within the arts and sciences. Despite such abundance, it is safe to say that Schoenberg's approaches
and developments remain far more popular and fertile in the eld of musical
research than, for example, proposals of the Italian Futurists or the Russian
Constructivists.
46. Composed at
the end of Schoenberg's life (1947), the piece presents several departures from
earlier serial compositions. As its main structural feature, the piece does not
utilize an ordered twelve-tone row, and instead utilizes hexachordal and trichordal partitioning of its source material. However,
is a mutifaceted work, combining modernist musical language, secular and spiritual texts, and a remarkable fusion between the past and the present of musical
expression.
1 Evelyne
3 (2007): 204.
Organized Sound
12, no.
the primary row and its inversion. Since the entire twelve-tone row is achieved
through such pairings, we will refer to its primary hexachord as
we will refer to the hexachord of the inversion as
I0 .
P0 .
Similarly,
primary and inverted hexachords will be notated with the transposition index
in the subscript.
Combinatorial means establish a myriad of potential methods for presentation and development of the entire twelve-tone aggregate. Schoenberg's design,
however, achieves self-similarity through carefully constructing the trichordal
components of the source hexachord. In particular, the augmented triad A[-CE is present in three of the source hexachords (P0 ,
the inversions (I3 ,
I7 ,
and
I11 ).2
P4 ,
and
P8 )
and in three of
allowing him to modulate from one hexachord to the next. These shifts allow
him to capitalize on unique trichordal remainders of each of the aforementioned
hexachords above. The notion of "developmental" motion within the piece is
achieved by the above modulation between row transpositions and the trichordal
combinatoriality. Cadential arrivals often return to the primary row form, as
can be seen in the formal analysis.
The modernity of the serial language discussed above is not without context.
While the text was written by Schoenberg himself, Willi Reich accounts the
origin of a text to a published interview with a real survivor from a Warsaw
ghetto.
to their slaughter (an ultimate act of deance and reassertion of the Jewish
3 The prayer is the ultimate focal point of the piece, and is alluded to as
4 Schoenberg's treatment of the text implies its role as a
early as mm. 16-17.
faith).
2 Richard
3 Mark
ity
in
Feezell,
Arnold
The
Lord
Schoenberg's
Our
God
Is
One:
Form,
Technique,
Op.
46,
and
Spiritual-
available
from
4 Michael
le, as Schoenberg restates the A theme in mm. 25-31, and follows with a clear
motion through the development (mm. 32-53) and recapitulation (54-70). As
stated previously, the prayer section (mm. 80-99) is the goal of the piece, both
in terms of textual importance and the musical design.
The exposition focuses on the aforementioned augmented triad (A[, C, E)
by deriving most of its musical material in
present (m. 7 -
I3
and
P4 ;
m. 8 -
I7 ,
P0
I0
and
P4 /I4
P4
hexachords in m. 18.
P0 /I0
conglomerate.
Reveille).
from attempts to analyze the music without utilizing Schoenberg's models for
hexachordal combinatoriality, but because of abundance of traditional models
within the piece. For example, Schoenberg's utilization of the trumpet fanfare
in the introduction (and its return at the end of Theme B) provide a traditional
musical context in light of the modernity of his compositional method.
very notion of sacred text setting provides an ancient musical context.
The
Its
P9 , P10 ,
and
P11
P0
P8 ,
and moving
in m. 37 (again, the
38-41).
of the German ocer, set in German (the native tongue of the composer, used
in the piece strictly for antagonistic Fascist speech), and the narration reaches
a sudden break in the rhythmic structure in m.
to the English narration of the occurence from the perspective of the survivor.
Pitchwise motion, however, presents a return to
P0
as a dramatic return from the striking reality of the described horrors to the
original retelling of a memory.
The recapitulation of the opening material, reinforced by the narrator's I
5 Amy
Schoenberg's
582.
A Survivor From Warsaw (1947). The Journal of Musicology 24, no. 4 (2007):
3
must have been unconscious, leads towards the nal transitional development
to the prayer material in mm. 72-80. While this transition is rather dicult to
analyse, its function is similar in the rise of tension to the preceding discussion of
the development, that is, to transport the listener into the heart of the atrocities.
The music features accelerandos to create the powerful moment of prayer, the
nal deance of the Jewish people in the face of death.
The Prayer
As mentioned before, Schoenberg wrote the text for the piece along with the
music, setting the text of
Shema Isroel.
P0 P8 /retrograde I8 .
mately arrives to
and
P4 /I4 ,
The sacred text setting here transcends the notion of modernity, and celebrates the origins of Western music as a whole. The textural expansion of the
vocal materials into a grandiose men's chorus underline the aesthetic acceptance
of Schoenberg's creation. The voice-leading of the section acts as a particular
residual of both worlds, deriving its origin from the row, yet facilitating the new
language for familiar and traditional musical aesthetic of a sacred text setting.
To reiterate,
Survivor
Conclusion
As mentioned previously,
Beat Follimi's view of the opening of the piece places conventional forms over
the dodecaphony, which further supports this claim.
6 Mark
ity
in
Feezell,
Arnold
The
Lord
Schoenberg's
Our
God
Is
One:
Form,
46,
and
Spiritual-
available
from
Despite its complex subject, documentary text, and modern musical language,
the music itself creates a compelling listening experience, extending its reach
toward a synthesis of the pantonal aesthetic.
References
[1] Feezell, Mark. The Lord Our God Is One: Form, Technique, and Spirituality in Arnold Schoenberg's
http://www.drfeezell.com/melodrama/schoenbergasurvivorfromwarsawweb.pdf.
Internet; accessed 28 November 2009.
[2] Strasser, Michael. 'A Survivor from Warsaw' as Personal Parable.
Music
[3] Wlodarski, Amy Lynn. An Idea Can Never Perish: Memory, the Musical
(1947).
The Journal of
Perspectives of
7 Michael
Organized