Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Conference held at Anaheim, California, June 1996). IAHS Publ. no. 239, 1997.
279
280
To estimate the rain-snow interface level in each event, an index temperature for
the storm. (Seguel & Stowhas, 1985) was calculated as a function of daily minimum
and maximum values. This value, calculated at Quinta Normal raingauge, together
with a regional thermal variation of -5.68 C/1000 m are used to estimate the
elevation associated with the threshold value for the index temperature fixed at 1C.
The effect of temperature on the position of the rain-snow interface is demonstrated
by the values of the contributing area for Macul and San Ramon basins, which
indicate a variation of almost 60% between storms (Table 2). There is almost no
variation in the Apoquindo basin or other basins that were analysed, for which the
highest elevation is below 2200 m a.m.s.l.
For the biggest daily precipitation observed at Quinta Normal gauge (1987
episode) a return period lower than 10 years can be associated. The maximum hourly
intensity of precipitation recorded at Quinta Normal in these events was always
higher than 7 mmh"1. The antecedent precipitation index (API), taken as the
cumulative precipitation 30 days before the storm does not seem to be an important
variable, but added to the storm precipitation constitutes over 50% of the normal
Table 1 Storm characteristics at Quinta Normal gauge in selected storms.
Date
27 September 1982
16 June 1986
14 July 1987
3 May 1993
Pu (mm)
20.2
18.6
51.1
14.6
i (mm h"1)
r(c)
7.2
7.2
11.7
12.8
11.4
16.2
11.1
9.7
API (mm)
145.0
137.0
6.9
101.7
P, 4 : daily precipitation; i: maximum hourly rain intensity; T: mean daily temperature; HSL: estimated
elevation of snow-rain interface level; API: Antecedent Precipitation Index.
281
'
annual precipitation in all cases being analysed. An exception is the most damaging
event, where the main factor of debris flow origin is attributed to the increase of
mean daily temperature. This raised the 0C isotherm level to a higher than normal
position, causing a significant increase of contributing area in mountainous basins.
The stream mean slope varies with elevation as indicated in Table 2 and is shown
in Fig. 2 for the Macul Creek. The variation between storms represent almost a 50%
change from the lowest slope indicated. Also, for all the cases analysed, the stream
width varies with elevation in a similar way as indicated in Fig. 2 for Macul Creek.
METHODOLOGY
Usually when flow information is available for a period of sufficient length to satisfy
the needed precision for the results, a frequency analysis is carried out using such
data to obtain design flow values. When scarce or no information is available and a
design flow magnitude is needed, an indirect method such as a rainfall-runoff
relation is commonly used. In that case, the frequency analysis of the recorded
rainfall during a long period is the base of design flow values.
4000 -1
0-1
6
7
8
Distance (km)
10
11
12
13
282
qp =
4O0tp-lM
where tp is the time to reach peak flow, in hours, tu the rainfall duration, in hours,
and qp the peak flow, in Is"1 km"2. The form of the unit hydrographs were defined
using Commons non dimensional distribution. The derived unit hydrograph for each
event in each basin, was corrected to have a unit volume.
The mean total precipitation P, in mm, over the basin was estimated using the
following expression calibrated in the region:
P = -9.3*10n*r3-9 + 2.67*PQN0'83 + 3.58
where PQN is the recorded value for the storm at Quinta Normal raingauge in mm and
z is the mean elevation of the basin in m a.m.s.l.
For each event, the time distribution of precipitation was assumed to be equal to
that observed in the Quinta Normal raingauge. The same calibrated infiltration <j)
index for the gauged basins was used for the basins under study.
Once hydrographs were obtained, peak flows were extracted for each event; then
assuming that these values were the highest for the period being analysed, a return
period was assigned to each value and a graphical frequency analysis was performed.
RESULTS
In Table 3 the peak flow values obtained for each event and the assigned return
period are presented. It can be seen from Tables 2 and 3 that, depending on the
basin, not always the biggest precipitation or the highest hourly effective rainfall
intensity generates the maximum peak flows. Peak values are a function of a
combination of the facts already mentioned and the mean daily temperature.
A graphical frequency analysis, like the one presented in Fig. 3 for Macul Creek
basin, was performed for each basin using values presented in Table 3.
For the event that occurred on 3 May 1993, the removed sediment volume
283
Macul
Q (m3 s1)
T (years)
San R a m o n
Q (m 3 s-1)
T (years)
Apoquindo
Q (m 3 s~>)
T (years)
22.7
18.6
24.1
47.5
17
13
26
51
28.1
19.2
27.9
53.0
26
13
17
51
23.9
18.8
26.9
34.8
17
13
26
51
estimated for Macul Creek basin was 800 000 m3. Ayala & Soli's (1994) developed a
computational model to simulate the characteristics of a debris flow associated with
this event using the hydrograph derived here. The maximum volumetric
concentration obtained was 40% and the derived peak total flow was 80 m3 s"1.
CONCLUSIONS
The main conclusions extracted from this study are the following:
- In certain basins, debris flow occurrence is due to hydrometeorological factors,
but the characteristics of the basin, in particular an erodible bed stream, are
clearly the main factors.
- In these events, the 30 days antecedent precipitation added to the storm
precipitation represent a value of the order of the normal annual precipitation.
- For these episodes, there are threshold values for effective rainfall intensity
estimated during time of concentration of the basin, that limit the occurrence of
debris flows. These intensities are 8.2 and 10.2 mmh"1 for San Ramon and
100 -
[D^-^-~~
a^-~~'~~~
CO
J.
10 -
10
100
Return Period (years)
284
Macul Creek basins, respectively. For non erodible bed streams, like Apoquindo
Creek basin, values on the order of 22 mm h"1 during the basin time of
concentration do not originate the phenomenon.
There is a threshold value of liquid peak flows in each basin of erodible bed that
limits the occurrence of debris flows. This value is 19 m3 s"1 in San Ramon and
Macul Creek basins.
Acknowledgements The authors thanks FONDECYT for the financial support for
this study given through project #1940545.
REFERENCES
Ayala, L. & Soli's, E. (1994) Simulation of hydrometeorological debris flows over an erodible bed (Simulation de
crecidas de detritos hidrometeorolgicas en un lecho erosionable). In: XII Chilean Congress of Hydraulic
Engineering, vol. 2, 315-327. Chilean Society of Hydraulic Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
Seguel, R. & Stowhas, L. (1985) Design flow estimation for mixed rainy-snowy basins (Estimation de crecidas de
disefio en cuencas mixtas pluvio-nivales). In: VII National Congress of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 2, 317-336.
University of Conception-Chilean Society of Hydraulic Engineering, Conception, Chile.
Vargas, X., Lara, P. & Ayala, L. (1996) Hydrologie Characterization of Debris Flows in Central Chile (Caracterizacion
Hidrolgica de las Corrientes de Detritos en Chile Central). Publ. no. 94, Civil Engineering Department,
University of Chile, Santiago, Chile