Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
March 1, 2016
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.1
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.2
Copyright Materials
This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright laws.
Reproduction,
distribution, display and use of the presentation without written permission of AISC is prohibited.
Course Description
Session 5: Symmetric, Singly Symmetric and Unsymmetric
Columns
March 1, 2016
This session examines single and double angle and single and double WT
compression members as well as cruciform and I-shapes that behave in a similar
fashion. Limit states of flexural buckling and torsional or flexural-torsional
buckling are explained for members with and without slender elements. Several
examples will be presented.
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.3
Learning Objectives
Gain an understanding of AISC Specification provisions that
govern design of symmetric, singly symmetric and
unsymmetric columns
Understand and apply the provisions for compression
members with slender elements
Calculate compression strength of members based on the
limit states of flexural buckling and torsional or flexuraltorsional buckling
Analyze the interaction of compression and flexural loads on
a single angle member
Theres always a solution in steel!
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.4
5.9
Lesson 5 Compression
Compression members are covered in
Chapter E
This chapter is organized differently from
Chapter F for flexural members
Single angles are the only shape treated with
their own section, E5
All other shapes are treated through the
same set of provisions
5.10
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.5
Lesson 5 Compression
The limit state of flexural buckling is
covered in E3
The limit states of torsional buckling and
flexural-torsional buckling are covered in
E4
Section E7 addresses compression
members with slender elements and refers
back to E3 and E4 when necessary
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.11
KL
E
or y 2.25
4.71
r
Fy
Fe
E3-1
E3-2
Fy
Fcr = 0.658 Fe Fy
5.12
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.6
KL
E
> 4.71
or y > 2.25
r
Fy
Fe
Fcr = 0.877 Fe
E3-3
and
Fe =
2 E
KL
E3-4
5.13
Fy
Fcr = 0.658 Fe Fy
E3-2
Fcr = 0.877 Fe
E3-3
Eq. E3-2
Eq. E3-3
Inelastic Buckling
Elastic Buckling
Fe =
2 E
KL
E3-4
Flexural buckling is
the same, regardless
of the cross section
shape.
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.14
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.7
5.15
2
( K z L )
I x + I y
E4-4
4 Fey Fez H
1 1
2
Fey + Fez )
(
E4-5
5.16
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.8
xo
yo
2
Fe ( Fe Fex ) = 0
ro
ro
E4-6
where
Fex =
2 E
KxL
rx
E4-7
Fey =
2 E
KyL
ry
E4-8
2 EC
1
w
Fez =
GJ
+
2
2
( K z L )
Ag ro
E4-9
5.17
xo2 + yo2
ro2
E4-10
Ix + I y
Ag
E4-11
5.18
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.9
4 Fcry Fcrz H
1 1
2
( Fcry + Fcrz )
E4-2
Fcry = Fcr from Eq. E3-2 or E3-3 for flexural buckling about
y-axis of symmetry
GJ
E4-3
Fcrz =
Ag ro2
5.19
5.20
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.10
5.21
5.22
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.11
b
E
0.45
t
Fy
when 0.45
Qs = 1.0
when
E7-10
E b
E
< 0.91
Fy t
Fy
b F
Qs = 1.34 0.76 y
t E
b
E
> 0.91
t
Fy
Qs =
Fy = 36 ksi
Eq. E7-10
0.53E
b
Fy
t
E7-11
E7-12
5x the most
slender leg
angle
Eq. E7-12
b t = 12.8
b t = 25.8
5.23
For
QFy
KL
E
> 4.71
;
r
QFy
Fcr = 0.877 Fe
E7-2 (E3-2)
E7-3 (E3-3)
5.24
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.12
Example 1
Determine the compressive strength of an
L8x4x7/16 A36 loaded at its centroid
x
Ag = 5.11 in.2
rz = 0.867 in.
A
5.25
Example 1
Determine the leg slenderness
b
8
E
=
= 18.3 > 0.45
= 12.8
t 7 16
Fy
5.26
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.13
Example 1
Our angle falls in the region of Eq. E7-11
when 0.45
E
b
E
= 12.8 < = 18.3 0.91
= 25.8
Fy
t
Fy
b F
Qs = 1.34 0.76 y
t E
Qs = 1.34 0.76 (18.3)
E7-11
36
= 0.850
29, 000
The 4 in. leg is not slender. Had it been slender, it would have been
conservative to use Qs for the most slender leg. Therefore Q = Qs
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.27
Example 1
For flexural buckling the division between
29, 000
= 145
inelastic and elastic KLr = 4.71 QFE = 4.71 0.85
( 36 )
y
KL
= 69.2
rz
Q = 1.0
Q = 0.85
KL
= 133.7
r
KL
= 145
r
KL 5.0 (12 )
=
= 69.2
0.867
rz
5.28
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.14
Example 1
For this 5 ft compression member
With
QFy
Fe
KL 5.0 (12 )
=
= 69.2,
0.867
rz
Fe =
2 E
2 ( 29, 000 )
= 59.8 ksi
E3-4
QFy
0.85( 36 )
Fe
Fcr = 0.658 QFy = 0.658 59.8 0.85 ( 36 ) = 24.7 ksi
E7-2
E7-1
0.85 ( 36 )
= 0.511 2.25
59.8
KL
rz
( 69.2 )
5.29
Example 2
A more realistic location for loading might
be at the edge of the leg as shown.
x
4.0 in.
z
C
y
This loading arrangement will result in
bending moment about both principal
axes. Thus, we will need to determine
moment strength as we did in Lesson 1
Example 5.
5.30
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.15
Example 2
Section properties for L8x4x7/16
x
4.0 in.
Manual
Table 1-7
d = 4.00 in.
t = 7 in.
16
x = 0.829 in.
y = 2.81 in.
Shapes Database
A
wA = 2.39 in.
z A = 3.33 in.
wB = 1.53 in.
zB = 2.50 in.
I w = 36.4 in.4
b = 8.00 in.
Shapes
Database
A = 5.11 in.
I x = 34.2 in.4
I y = 6.03 in.4
S wA = 11.0 in.3
S wB = 14.6 in.3
S wC = 7.04 in.3
S zA = 1.61 in.3
S zB = 2.51 in.3
S zC = 5.09 in.3
I z = 3.84 in.4
rz = 0.867 in.
tan = 0.268
5.31
Example 2
The determination of flexural strength of
the angle follows the procedure discussed
in Lesson 1.
F10.1 Yielding
M nw = 1.5 ( 36 )( 7.04 ) = 380 in.-kips
F10-1
E
29, 000
b
8
E
29, 000
= 0.54
= 15.3 < =
= 18.3 > 0.91
= 0.91
= 25.8
Fy
36
t 7
Fy
36
16
Therefore noncompact
5.32
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.16
Example 2
F10.3 Leg local buckling point C is in
compression for bending about the w-axis
b Fy
M nw = Fy S wC 2.43 1.72
t
E
F10-7
8
36
7 29, 000
16
= 335 in.-kips
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.33
Example 2
F10.2 Lateral-torsional buckling
Does not apply to z-axis bending
Lb t
4.9 EI z Cb 2
+
+ w
0.052
w
2
Lb
rz
( 5.0 (12 ) )
F10-5
5.0 (12 ) 7
16
( 0.867 )
( )
5.34
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.17
Example 2
F10.2 Lateral-torsional buckling
M y = 36 ( 7.04 ) = 253 in.-kips < M e = 505 in.-kips
M yw
M nw = 1.92 1.17
M yw 1.5M yw
M
ew
253
= 1.92 1.17
( 253)
505
F10-3
5.35
Example 2
Thus, for each flexural limit state and each
axis, the nominal moment strength, Mn, is
Limit State
w-axis bending
(in.-kips)
z-axis bending
(in.-kips)
Yielding
380
86.9
335
NA
Lateral-torsional
Buckling
276
NA
5.36
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.18
Example 2
Determine applied moments
w
1.19 in.
P
ew
x = 0.829
4.0 in.
ez
A
y = 2.81
M w = Pew
Principal axes
M z = Pez
Geometric axes
w
x
M x = P (1.19 )
M y = P ( 0.829 )
5.37
Example 2
Determine applied moments
w
B
Resultant Moments
Mx
My
M w = 1.36 P
M z = 0.492 P
M w = M x cos + M y sin
= 1.19 P cos (15.03) + 0.829 P sin (15.03) = 1.36 P
w
x
M z = M x sin + M y cos
= 1.19 P sin (15.03) + 0.829 P cos (15.03) = 0.492 P
5.38
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.19
Example 2
Chapter C requires that we consider all
second-order effects.
We are permitted to use the approximate
approach in Appendix 8
Since this single angle column is very
flexible about the z-axis in particular, we
can not ignore these second-order effects.
5.39
Example 2
Appendix 8 approximate second-order
effects
with no sidesway
M rw = B1w M w
M rz = B1z M z
where
B1w =
Cm
P
1 r
Pe1w
Cm
B1z =
P
1 r
Pe1z
and
A-8-3
A-8-1
Pe1w =
Pe1z =
2 EI w
( KL )
2 EI z
( KL )
A-8-5
5.40
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.20
Example 2
Second-order effects
Cm = 1 for uniform moment along length
= 1.0 for LRFD = 1.6 for ASD
Pe1w =
2 EI w
( KL )
= 2890 kips
( 60 )
2
2 EI z ( 29, 000 )( 3.84 )
Pe1z =
=
= 305 kips
2
2
( 60 )
( KL )
2
5.41
Example 2
Second-order effects for LRFD
If the applied load is
Pu = 75 kips
B1w =
B1z =
Cm
1.0
=
= 1.03
Pr
75
1
1
2890
Pe1w
Cm
1.0
=
= 1.33
Pr
75
1
1
305
Pe1z
5.42
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.21
Example 2
Required moment strength for LRFD
M uw = 1.03 (1.36 ( 75 ) ) = 105 in.-kips
H2-1
5.43
Example 2
Interaction at points A, B, and C for LRFD
Pra M rbw M rbz
=
A
75.0
105
49.1
+
Pca M cbw M cbz
=
B
75.0
105
49.1
+
0.9 (126 ) 0.9 ( 276 ) 0.9 ( 86.9 ) B
=
C
75.0
105
49.1
+
5.44
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.22
Example 2
Second-order effects for ASD
If the applied load is
Pa = 50 kips
B1w =
B1z =
Cm
1.0
=
= 1.03
Pr
1.6 ( 50.0 )
1
1
Pe1w
2890
Cm
1.0
=
= 1.36
P
1.6 50.0 )
1 r 1 (
Pe1z
305
5.45
Example 2
Required moment strength for ASD
M aw = 1.03 (1.36 ( 50 ) ) = 70.0 in.-kips
H2-1
5.46
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.23
Example 2
Interaction at points A, B, and C for ASD
Pra M rbw M rbz
=
A
50.0
70.0
33.5
+
Pca M cbw M cbz
=
B
50.0
70.0
33.5
=
C
50.0
70.0
33.5
5.47
5.48
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.24
Example 3
Determine the compressive strength of the
cruciform column shown when the effective
length for lateral buckling and torsional
buckling are each 10.0 ft, Fy = 50 ksi
Section properties
A = 7.75 in.2
0.5 in.
8 in.
I x = I y = 21.4 in.4
rx = ry = 1.66 in.
J =
8 in.
5.49
Example 3
Check element slenderness
Table B4.1a, Case 3
b 3.75
E
29, 000
=
= 7.5 < 0.45
= 0.45
= 10.8
t
0.5
Fy
50
0.5 in.
8 in.
8 in.
5.50
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.25
Example 3
E3. Flexural buckling
29, 000
KL 10.0 (12 )
E
=
= 72.3 < 4.71
= 4.71
= 113
1.66
50
ry
Fy
Fe =
2 E
KL
Fy
Fcr = 0.658 Fe
2 ( 29, 000 )
( 72.3)
= 54.8
E3-4
50
E3-2
5.51
Example 3
E4. Torsional buckling
E4.(b)(i) for doubly symmetric members
Use Eq. E3-2 or E3-3 with Fe determined
through Eq. E4-4
2 EC
1
1
w
Fe =
+ GJ
= [GJ ]
2
I
I
I
Iy
+
+
( K z L )
x y
x
(11, 200 )( 0.646 )
=
( 21.4 + 21.4 )
E4-4
= 169 ksi
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.52
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.26
Example 3
E4. Torsional buckling
For torsional buckling we dont have KL/r,
therefore it requires that we use the Fy/Fe limit
Fy
Fe
So use
50
= 0.296 < 2.25
169
Fy
Fcr = 0.658 Fe Fy
50
E3-2
5.53
Example 3
The controlling limit state is flexural
buckling so
Pn = 7.75 ( 34.1) = 264 kips
5.54
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.27
Example 4
Determine the strength of a T-shaped
column using the same plates as used in
Example 3.
Section properties
A = 7.75 in.2
8 in.
I x = 48.6 in.4
I y = 21.4 in.4
5.81 in.
0.5 in.
8 in.
rx = 2.50 in.
ry = 1.66 in.
J =
5.55
Example 4
Additional properties
xo = 0
yo = 8.0 5.81 0.5 2 = 1.94 in. (distance from centroid to shear center)
ro2 = xo2 + yo2 +
Ix + I y
Ag
= 0 + (1.94 ) +
2
48.6 + 21.4
= 12.8
7.75
E4-11
xo2 + yo2
0 + 1.942
= 1
= 0.706
2
ro
12.8
E4-10
5.56
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.28
Example 4
Check flange and stem slenderness,
Table B4.1a
Flange: Case 1
bf
2t f
8.0
E
= 8.0 < 0.56
= 13.5
2 ( 0.50 )
Fy
Nonslender
Stem: Case 4
d 8.0
E
=
= 16 < 0.75
= 18.1
t 0.5
Fy
Nonslender
5.57
Example 4
E3. Flexural buckling
29, 000
KL 10.0 (12 )
E
=
= 72.3 < 4.71
= 4.71
= 113
1.66
50
ry
Fy
Fe =
2 E
KL
Fy
Fcr = 0.658 Fe
2 ( 29, 000 )
( 72.3)
= 54.8
E3-4
50
54.8
E3-2
Fy = 0.658 ( 50 ) = 34.1 ksi
5.58
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.29
Example 4
E4. Flexural-torsional buckling
E4.(a) for double angle and tee shaped
compression members
Calculate Fcr directly with
F + Fcrz
Fcr = cry
2H
4 Fcry Fcrz H
1 1
2
Fcry + Fcrz )
(
E4-2
5.59
Example 4
where
Fcry = Fcr (already determined) = 34.1 ksi
Fcrz =
E4-3
5.60
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.30
Example 4
Therefore, the critical stress is
4 Fcry Fcrz H
1
1
( Fcry + Fcrz )
34.1 + 72.8
4 ( 34.1)( 72.8 )( 0.706 )
=
1 1
2
( 34.1 + 72.8)
2 ( 0.706 )
= 28.6 ksi < Fcr = 34.1 ksi
F + Fcrz
Fcr = cry
2H
so
E4-2
E4-1
5.61
Example 4
E4. Flexural -torsional buckling
We could also use the general provisions
E4.(b)(ii) for singly symmetric members
Use Eq. E3-2 or E3-3 with Fe determined
through Eq. E4-5
F + Fez
Fe = ey
2H
4 Fey Fez H
1 1
2
Fey + Fez )
(
E4-5
5.62
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.31
Example 4
thus
Fey =
2 E
KyL
ry
2 ( 29, 000 )
( 72.3)
= 54.8
2 EC
1
GJ
w
Fez =
GJ
+
=
2
2
Ag ro2
( K z L )
Ag ro
=
E4-9
= 72.8 ksi
5.63
Example 4
Therefore, the elastic buckling stress is
4 Fey Fez H
E4-5
1 1
2
Fey + Fez )
(
54.8 + 72.8
4 ( 54.8 )( 72.8 )( 0.706 )
=
1 1
2
( 54.8 + 72.8)
2 ( 0.706 )
= 40.2 ksi
F + Fez
Fe = ey
2H
5.64
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.32
Example 4
E4. Flexural-torsional buckling
For flexural-torsional buckling we again use
the Fy/Fe limit
Fy
Fe
50
= 1.24 < 2.25
40.2
So use
Fy
Fcr = 0.658 Fe Fy
50
E3-2
5.65
Example 4
The controlling limit state is flexuraltorsional buckling so
Pn = 7.75 ( 29.7 ) = 230 kips
It is seen that determining the strength according
to E4.(a), the special provisions for double
angles and tees, is a bit conservative and not all
that simpler.
E4.(a): Pn = 222 kips and E4.(b)(ii): Pn = 230 kips
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.66
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.33
Example 5
Using the same area, make an I-shape
and determine its strength.
ho = 7.75 in.
8 in.
Section properties
A = 7.75 in.2
0.25 in.
8 in.
0.5 in.
Cw =
I x = 77.7 in.4
I y = 21.4 in.4
rx = 3.17 in.
I y ho2
4
21.4 ( 7.75 )
4
= 321 in.6
ry = 1.66 in.
J =
5.67
Example 5
Check flange and web slenderness,
Table B4.1a
Flange: Case 2
bf
2t f
h tw = 4
Slender
Web: Case 5
h 7.5
E
=
= 15 < 1.49
= 35.9
tw 0.5
Fy
Nonslender
5.68
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.34
Example 5
For the slender unstiffened flange of a
built-up member use E7.1(b)
0.64
bf
0.76 ( 29, 000 )
0.76 ( 29, 000 )
kE
= 13.4 <
= 16 < 1.17 c = 1.17
= 24.6
Fy
50
2t f
50
therefore
b Fy
Qs = 1.415 0.65
t Ekc
= 1.415 0.65 (16 )
E7-8
50
= 0.920
0.76 ( 29, 000 )
5.69
Example 5
E3. Flexural buckling
KL 10.0 (12 )
E
29, 000
=
= 72.3 < 4.71
= 4.71
= 118
ry
QFy
1.66
0.92 ( 50 )
Fe =
2 E
KL
2 ( 29, 000 )
QFy
Fcr = Q 0.658 Fe
( 72.3)
= 54.8
0.92( 50 )
E3-4
E7-2
5.70
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.35
Example 5
E4. Torsional buckling
E4.(b)(i) for doubly symmetric members
Use Eq. E3-2 or E3-3 with Fe determined
through Eq. E4-4
2 EC
1
w
Fe =
+ GJ
E4-4
2
( K z L )
I x + I y
2 ( 29000 )( 321)
11200
0.396
=
+
(
)
2
(10 (12 ) )
( 77.7 + 21.4 )
5.71
Example 5
E4. Torsional buckling
For torsional buckling we dont have KL/r,
therefore it requires that we use the Fy/Fe limit
QFy 0.92 ( 50 )
Fe
109
So use
QFy
E7-2
Fcr = Q 0.658 Fe Fy
0.92( 50 )
5.72
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.36
Example 5
The controlling limit state is flexural buckling so
Ex. 3
Ex. 4
Ex. 5
Fe
54.8
54.8
54.8
Fcr
34.1
34.1
32.4
Fe
169
40.2
109
Fcr
44.2
29.7
38.9
Pn
264
230
251
5.73
Example 6
To better understand when torsional
buckling can control for doubly symmetric
I-shapes, consider this column at L= 30 ft,
braced at the third points for flexural
buckling about the x- and y-axes but not
braced torsionally at these points
0.92( 50 )
2 ( 29, 000 )
KL 10 (12 )
54.8
F
54.8,
0.92
0.658
=
= 72.3, Fe =
=
=
50 = 32.4 ksi
cr
2
ry
1.66
( 72.3)
5.74
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.37
Example 6
For torsional buckling, with the unbraced
length KzL = 30 ft
2 EC
1
w
Fe =
+ GJ
E4-4
2
( K z L )
I x + I y
2 ( 29000 )( 321)
11200
0.396
=
+
(
)
2
( 30 (12 ) )
( 77.7 + 21.4 )
= 51.9 ksi
5.75
Example 6
Since Fe for torsional buckling is less than
Fe for flexural buckling, torsional buckling
controls and
QFy
Fe
0.92 ( 50 )
= 0.886 < 2.25
51.9
QFy
Fcr = Q 0.658 Fe Fy
Which results in
E7-2
0.92( 50 )
5.76
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.38
Compression
In the 6 examples we have considered so far,
we have treated, single angle, cruciform, tee,
and I-shape
For flexural buckling, all shapes are treated the
same
For torsional or flexural-torsional buckling,
shapes are broken into 4 classifications
For slender elements, there are 7 categories
5.77
Compression
To consider some additional possibilities, we will
look at a double angle and a double WT
We will find that we are using the same
provisions already considered
For the built-up members, we will assume, for
this Lesson, that they are sufficiently attached to
each other so that they do work together as one
Requirements for that connection will be
discussed in Lesson 6
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.78
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.39
Example 7
Determine the nominal compressive
strength of 2-L5 x 3 x LLBB A36 angles
used as the top chord of a truss. The
angles are attached with welds as needed
to insure they work as one.
10 ft
5.79
Example 7
Determine the nominal compressive
strength of 2-L5 x 3 x LLBB A36 angles
used as the top chord of a truss.
Single Angle Table 1-7
2
3/8 in.
4
Ag = 1.94 in.
I x = 5.09 in.
rx = 1.62 in.
I y = 1.41 in.4
ry = 0.853 in.
rz = 0.652 in.
J = 0.0438 in.4
Q = 0.804
x
x = 0.648 in.
y
5.80
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.40
Example 7
Combined properties Table 1-15
Ag = 3.88 in.2
H = 0.638 in.
ro = 2.52 in.
rx = 1.62 in.
3/8 in.
2
= 5.53 in.4
I y = 2 1.41 + 1.94 0.648 + 3
16
5.53
= 1.19 in.
3.88
J = 2 ( 0.0438 ) = 0.0876 in.4
ry =
x = 0.648 in.
y
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.81
Example 7
E3. Flexural buckling
29, 000
KL 10.0 (12 )
E
=
= 101 < 4.71
= 4.71
= 149
ry
QFy
1.19
0.804 ( 36 )
Fe =
QFy
Fcr = Q 0.658 Fe
2 E
KL
2 ( 29, 000 )
(101)
= 28.1
0.804( 36 )
E3-4
E7-2
5.82
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.41
Example 7
E4. Flexural-torsional buckling
E4.(a) for double angle and tee shaped
compression members
Calculate Fcr directly with
F + Fcrz
Fcr = cry
2H
4 Fcry Fcrz H
1 1
2
Fcry + Fcrz )
(
E4-2
5.83
Example 7
where
Fcry = Fcr (already determined) = 18.8 ksi
Fcrz =
E4-3
5.84
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.42
Example 7
Therefore , the critical stress is
4 Fcry Fcrz H
1
1
( Fcry + Fcrz )
18.8 + 39.8
4 (18.8 ) 39.8 ( 0.638 )
=
1 1
2
(18.8 + 39.8)
2 ( 0.638 )
= 15.3 ksi < Fcr = 18.8 ksi
F + Fcrz
Fcr = cry
2H
so
E4-2
E4-1
5.85
Double Angles
Leg slenderness for double angles is a
function of spacing, gap (3) or no gap (1).
Fy = 36 ksi
Case 1, Qs = 0.894
Double angles in
contact, E7.1(a)
Case 3, Qs = 0.804
5x
5.86
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.43
Double WT
Since WTs are made form W-shapes, the
flange will not be slender since the Wshape flange is not slender (Same Table B4.1a Case 1)
The stem is often slender according to
Case 4 in Table B4.1a
Unlike for double angles, combining WTs
does not alter the element slenderness
check
5.87
Double WT
Stem slenderness, E7.1(d)
Fy = 50 ksi
Eq. E7-13
Eq. E7-15
0.75
E
Fy
1.03
E
Fy
5.88
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.44
Double WT
For torsional buckling use the provisions for a
doubly symmetric member, E4(b)(i)
As for the cruciform, ignore the warping
contribution, Cw
The controlling axis for flexural buckling is not
always the y-axis.
As we did with double angles, we will assume
that they are connected sufficiently to be
considered a single member
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.89
Example 8
Determine the nominal compressive
strength of a member composed of 2-WT6
x 29 A992 shapes with an effective length
Single WT,
of 20 ft.
Manual Table 1-8 2-WT calculated
y
y = 1.03 in.
A = 8.52 in.2
I x = 19.1 in.4
I y = 53.5 in.
rx = 1.50 in.
ry = 2.51 in.
J = 1.05 in.4
Qs = 1.00
= 63.5 in.4
63.5
= 1.93 in.
17.0
I y = 2 ( 53.5 ) = 107 in.4
rx =
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.45
Example 8
E3. Flexural buckling
KL 20.0 (12 )
E
29, 000
=
= 124 > 4.71
= 4.71
= 113
rx
Fy
1.93
50
Fe =
2 E
KL
2 ( 29, 000 )
(124 )
= 18.6 ksi
E3-4
E3-3
5.91
Example 8
E4. Torsional buckling
E4.(b)(i) for doubly symmetric members
Use Eq. E3-2 or E3-3 with Fe determined
through Eq. E4-4
2 EC
1
1
w
+ GJ
= [GJ ]
Fe =
2
I
+
I
I
+
Iy
( K z L )
x y
x
(11, 200 )( 2.10 )
=
( 63.5 + 107 )
E4-4
= 138 ksi
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.92
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.46
Example 8
E4. Torsional buckling
For torsional buckling we dont have KL/r,
therefore it requires that we use the Fy/Fe limit
Fy
Fe
So use
50
= 0.362 < 2.25
138
Fy
Fcr = 0.658 Fe Fy
E3-2
50
5.93
Example 8
The controlling limit state is flexural
buckling so
Pn = 17.0 (16.3) = 277 kips
5.94
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.47
Example 8
What would have changed if we had
included the contribution of warping?
Single WT Cw = 2.08 in.4 Manual Table 1-8
2-WT
E4-4
=
+
11,
200
2.10
(
)(
)
2
( 63.5 + 107 )
( 20 (12 ) )
20.6 + 23,520
No change
=
= 138 ksi
( 63.5 + 107 )
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.95
Example 9
Now consider 2-WT8 x 33.5 A992 shapes
with an effective length of 10 ft.
y
y = 1.56 in.
Single WT,
Manual Table 1-8
A = 9.81 in.2
I x = 48.6 in.4
I y = 59.5 in.
rx = 2.22 in.
ry = 2.46 in.
J = 1.19 in.4
Qs = 0.859
2-WT calculated
A = 2 ( 9.81) = 19.6 in.2
2
I x = 2 48.6 + 9.81(1.56 + 3 16 )
= 157 in.4
157
= 2.83 in.
19.6
I y = 2 ( 59.5 ) = 119 in.4
rx =
5.96
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.48
Example 9
E3. Flexural buckling
KL 10.0 (12 )
E
29, 000
=
= 48.8 < 4.71
= 4.71
= 113
ry
Fy
2.46
50
Fe =
2 E
KL
2 ( 29, 000 )
( 48.8)
QFy
Fcr = Q 0.658 Fe
= 120 ksi
E3-4
0.859( 50 )
E3-2
5.97
Example 9
E4. Torsional buckling
E4.(b)(i) for doubly symmetric members
Use Eq. E3-2 or E3-3 with Fe determined
through Eq. E4-4
2 EC
1
1
w
+ GJ
= [GJ ]
Fe =
2
I
+
I
I
+
Iy
( K z L )
x y
x
(11, 200 )( 2.38)
=
(157 + 119 )
E4-4
= 96.6 ksi
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.98
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.49
Example 9
E4. Torsional buckling
For torsional buckling we dont have KL/r,
therefore it requires that we use the Fy/Fe limit
QFy 0.859 ( 50 )
Fe
96.6
So use
QFy
Fcr = Q 0.658 Fe Fy
E3-2
0.859( 50 )
5.99
Example 9
The controlling limit state is torsional
buckling so
Pn = 19.6 ( 35.7 ) = 670 kips
Note: There are 273 different WT-shapes. Of these
the x-axis will control for 72 and the y-axis will
control for 201 when the gap is 3/8 in.
5.100
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.50
Summary
We have considered 6 different shape
compression members, single angle, double
angle, WT, double WT, cruciform, and I-shape
Four different slender elements were addressed
Flexural buckling and torsional or flexuraltorsional buckling were addressed
Combined axial and bending for an unsymmetric
single angle was treated.
All built up members were assumed to act as a
single member
Theres always a solution in steel!
5.101
Lesson 6
The built-up members treated in this lesson
will again be looked at to assess the
assumption of action as a single member
Additional built-up shapes will be considered
such as multiple angles and double channels
Connections between elements will be
addressed as lacing, battens, and tie plates
5.102
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.51
Thank You
5.103
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.52
8-Session Registrants
CEU/PDH Certificates
One certificate will be issued at the conclusion of
all 8 sessions.
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.53
8-Session Registrants
Quizzes
Access to the quiz: Information for accessing the quiz will be emailed to you by
Thursday. It will contain a link to access the quiz. EMAIL COMES FROM
NIGHTSCHOOL@AISC.ORG
Quiz and Attendance records: Posted Wednesday mornings.
www.aisc.org/nightschool - click on Current Course Details.
Reasons for quiz:
EEU must take all quizzes and final to receive EEU
CEUs/PDHS If you watch a recorded session you must take quiz for CEUs/PDHs.
REINFORCEMENT Reinforce what you learned tonight. Get more out of the
course.
NOTE: If you attend the live presentation, you do not have to take the quizzes to
receive CEUs/PDHs.
8-Session Registrants
Recording
Access to the recording: Information for accessing the
recording will be emailed to you by this Thursday. The recording
will be available for two weeks. For 8-session registrants only.
EMAIL COMES FROM NIGHTSCHOOL@AISC.ORG.
CEUs/PDHS If you watch a recorded session you must take
AND PASS the quiz for CEUs/PDHs.
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.54
Thank You
Please give us your feedback!
Survey at conclusion of webinar.
109
Copyright 2016
American Institute of Steel Construction
5.55