Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DOI 10.1007/s10903-014-0018-7
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Abstract Mental-illness-related (MIR) stigma is recognized as a major barrier to health care. Yet very little is
known about mental illness and stigma among Vietnamese
populations, or how emigration and acculturation processes
might affect traditional views. Focus group discussions
were conducted with Vietnamese Americans in New
Orleans (Louisiana) and Vietnamese nationals in Bui Chu
(Vietnam), who shared historical and cultural backgrounds,
in 2010 to assess differences in their perceptions of mental
illness and stigma. Results show several significant differences in mental illness perceptions between Vietnamese
Americans and Vietnamese nationals, while MIR stigma
seemed prevalent and understanding of mental illness was
low among both groups.
Keywords Mental illness Stigma Vietnamese
Vietnamese Americans
Introduction
Vietnamese Americans, like other Asian immigrants,
reportedly underutilize mental health services. Discussions
with Vietnamese immigrants in the United States and
elsewhere and with health professionals have pointed to
stigma as a major impediment to care [13]. Yet, little
M. Do N. N. K. Pham (&) S. Wallick
Department of Global Health Systems and Development,
School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane
University, New Orleans, LA, USA
e-mail: npham2@tulane.edu
B. K. Nastasi
Department of Psychology, Tulane University,
New Orleans, LA, USA
123
Methods
Approved by the Internal Review Board of Tulane University, in 2010, eight focus group discussions (FGDs)
were conducted among Vietnamese in eastern New Orleans
and Vietnamese nationals from Bui Chu (Vietnam). On
average, ten individuals participated in each FGD; a total
of 81 participants aged 2570 took part in the FGDs in both
Results
Through FGD coding based on thematic responses coupled
with surveys guideline questions and issues discussed,
important similarities and differences between the two
sample groups were noticed.
Similarities
Everyone agreed that mental illness was a departure from
the norms, as people with MIR problems did weird stuff,
or that they were anti-social. Many participants in New
Orleans used the word crazy to describe mental illness.
Both groups clearly distinguished the mentally ill, them,
from normal people like us, referring to the mentally ill
in third person while keeping both physical and social
distance, in fear of violent behaviors.
I am scared of it. If I see someone with mental illness,
I do not want to come near them. (Man, 50-70, New
Orleans)
Worries were a commonly cited cause of mental illness
among all participants, where one would become mentally
ill if he/she spent too much time thinking about his/her
problems, not sharing them with family members and
friends. Both groups distinguished long-term mental health
issues caused by major stressors from problems due to
daily stress. Sudden mental or emotional shocks, especially
from the wars, had long-lasting impacts in both locations.
I had 7 siblings and I was the only one who joined the
military. I almost lost my leg. My older brother died
in the North. Later on another brother died. Altogether I lost 5 siblings After fighting in the North,
my siblings and I evacuated from the war zone, we
lost contact with each other Without a family, no
wife, no children, I feel depressed. (Man, 50-70, New
Orleans)
In New Orleans, recent disasters were among leading
stressors. Not many communities suffered from repeat
traumas as did this communityfirst the wars, then
Hurricane Katrina, and more recently the BP Oil Spill.
Many Vietnamese Americans had barely recovered from
Hurricane Katrina, only to be worried again about their
financial situation as a result of the oil spill. The long-term
impacts are palpable:
1295
Differences
Important differences were observed between the two
groups. Vietnamese Americans were less likely than Vietnamese nationals to attach mental illness to a specific
physical health problem, but had a harder time describing it.
They made clear distinctions between mental and physical
health, in which mental health dealt with the state of mind.
In contrast, Vietnamese nationals often equated mental illness with physical problems, where causes of mental illness
were physical health and behaviors, including not being able
to eat or sleep.
Table 1 shows significant differences between the two
groups regarding to MIR stigma, based on data from the
quantitative measure of stigma. First, Vietnamese Americans were much more likely than Vietnamese nationals to
report no opinion to statements relating to MIR stigma,
which may indicate their reluctance to discuss stigma.
Second, for many statements indicating a stigmatizing
attitude toward the mentally ill, a significantly greater
proportion of Vietnamese Americans reported agreement
or no opinion than Vietnamese nationals. For example,
Vietnamese Americans were more likely than Vietnamese
nationals to not have an opinion or agree that families and
individuals with mental disorders should hide their illness
(67.6% compared to 22.5%), indicating stigmatizing attitudes towards those with MIR issues. Consistent with data
collected from the FGDs, quantitative data point to the
publics not-so-friendly perceptions towards those with
mental illness.
123
1296
Table 1 MIR stigma among
FGD participants in New
Orleans and Bui Chu
Statement
.000
2.8
27.5
Disagree
27.8
50.0
No opinion
36.1
2.5
Agree
22.2
15.0
Strongly agree
11.1
5.0
5.3
12.5
.000
2.6
30.0
No opinion
42.1
0.0
Agree
31.6
50.0
Strongly agree
18.4
7.5
2.6
17.5
Disagree
No opinion
31.6
42.1
50.0
2.5
Agree
15.8
25.0
7.9
5.0
Strongly agree
.000
.000
Strongly disagree
44.4
17.5
Disagree
16.7
62.5
No opinion
30.6
2.5
Agree
8.3
10.0
Strongly agree
0.0
7.5
.001
Strongly disagree
2.6
30.0
Disagree
7.9
17.5
No opinion
42.1
7.5
Agree
26.3
25.0
Strongly agree
21.1
20.0
.000
2.7
15.0
Disagree
13.5
52.5
No opinion
Agree
43.2
27.1
5.0
20.0
Strongly agree
13.5
7.5
2.6
17.5
Disagree
10.3
52.5
No opinion
41.0
7.5
Agree
35.9
15.0
Strongly agree
10.3
7.5
.000
.000
123
p-value
Strongly disagree
35.2
12.5
Disagree
No opinion
24.3
29.7
47.5
5.0
1297
Statement
Agree
Strongly agree
10.8
15.0
0.0
20.0
.001
Strongly disagree
32.4
15.0
Disagree
18.9
55.0
No opinion
37.9
10.0
Agree
8.1
5.0
Strongly agree
2.7
15.0
Discussion
This study highlights varying levels of understanding and
perceptions toward mental illness among Vietnamese
populations. None of the participants seemed to have a
good understanding of mental illness. Worries and
sudden traumatic experiences were cited as common causes for mental illness by both groups. In both locations,
participants indicated that sudden mental or emotional
shocks, such as wars or natural disasters, could result in
mental illness, not only among those directly involved but
possibly among the next generations as well.
However, there are also critical differences between the
two groups. Vietnamese nationals were more likely than
Vietnamese Americans to maintain the traditional view and
see the body and the mind as two parts of a unitary model
[5]; they were also more able to describe mental illness and
person(s) with such illness. Many participants also
emphasized the tendency of Vietnamese to keep problems
inside rather than talking about them, not wanting to be
reminded of the many repeat traumas that they have
endured. This finding is consistent with an earlier report on
the post-Katrina resilience of Vietnamese in New Orleans
[6]. Another possible explanation for reluctance to talk
about mental illness could be stigmatizing attitudes
towards those with mental issues. Living in the United
States, where privacy and the capacity for independent
living are highly valued, may have also contributed to
Vietnamese Americans view of mental illness as a personal matter, creating unwillingness to admit to or share
emotional troubles.
The study did not provide strong evidence that Vietnamese in New Orleans had less stigmatizing attitudes
toward mental illness than their counterparts in Bui Chu.
Life in a second culture did not substantially change the
Vietnamese Americans ideas about mental health; instead
it seemed to encourage them to hold back their opinions in
discussing MIR issues.
p-value
41
40
References
1. Sadavoy J, Meier R, Ong AY. Barriers to access to mental health
services for ethnic seniors: the Toronto study. [Research Support,
Non-U.S. Govt]. Can J Psychiatry. 2004;49(3):1929.
2. Wynaden D, Chapman R, Orb A, McGowan S, Zeeman Z, Yeak S.
Factors that influence Asian communities access to mental health
care. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Govt]. Int J Ment Health Nurs.
2005;14(2):8895. doi:10.1111/j.1440-0979.2005.00364.x.
3. Leong FT, Lau AS. Barriers to providing effective mental health
services to Asian Americans. Ment Health Serv Res. 2001;3(4):
20114.
4. Vu L, VanLandingham MJ. Physical and mental health consequences of Katrina on Vietnamese immigrants in New Orleans: a
pre- and post-disaster assessment. J Immigr Minor Health. 2012;
14(3):38694.
5. Obeyesekere G. Depression, Buddhism and the work of culture in
Sri Lanka. In: Culture and depression: studies in the anthropology
123
1298
and cross-cultural psychiatry of affect and disorder. 1985.
pp. 134152.
6. Carlin K, Preibe A, Do M, Bankston C, VanLandingham M.
Culture and Resiliency within a Vietnamese-American Enclave
123