Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
has to thrust its roots down into the ground and thrust its
leaves
up into the air. Everything has to work in order to live. This is
not conscious work, it is a necessity of functioning at all. All
that lives has got to fulfil that minimum requirement and so
have we.
t can be put as plainly as this: whenever we see something
that must be done it means that we become conscious.
Seeing
what is necessary and seeing what is necessary, as
necessary, is
the first condition of conscious labour. It is only when we do
what has to be done simply because it has to be done that
work
can liberate us from our own egoism. If we work for a
reward,
this reward is bound to be connected with the satisfaction of
something in us and almost certainly this something will
include our own egoism, self-love.
I
is reflected by
Louise Welch in Orage With Gurdjieff In America:
Beelzebubs Tales produced a powerful effect, but that is not to say it
was readily
grasped. There were
layers of meaning that people were touched by, but could not in any
way
formulateCould one listen, as
Orage advised, without giving way to constant verbal associations and
unrelated
imagery? Much of the
narrative was addressed to different levels of perception in people
(Gurdjieff had said
seven). The task
was to respond with the whole of ones mind, and not just with what
Gurdjieff called the
formatory
apparatus, that part of the brain which was busy classifying ideas and
objects, putting
them into pigeon
holes, and thereafter returning mechanically to them as statements of
truth. This was all
before the days of
the computer, but his description of the conclusions of the formatory
apparatus bears a
Close resemlance to a computer
This was the Alpha and Omega of his teaching, his final message, the bottle which he
cast upon the waters, before disappearing into the ocean.
One would have to be deaf and blind not to recognize that this thought and the Christian
tradition are identical in essence.
But what is being-Partkdolg-duty? What are conscious labors and intentional suffering?
First of all, conscious labors and intentional suffering are described as the sole possible
means foreordained by our common father creator endlessness for the assimilation of
the cosmic substances required for the coating and perfecting of the higher beingbodies. (BTTHG, p. 792).
During a recent gathering of several students of the teaching of Mr. Gurdjieff these
questions were asked. I went with a conviction I knew what being-Partkdolg-duty was
and I left with the sensation that I did not know. That to me means that I now understand
less which means that I am beginning to really understand. My participation in that
gathering was centered on exposing my views on what being-Partkdolg-duty is for me as
I saw it.
We cannot approach the understanding of being-Partkdolg-duty by the positive. We have
to do it by the negative. We cannot say what being-Partkdolg-duty is because it is never
said in Tales. The only time in which the term intentional suffering is specifically alluded
to in very clear terms is when Saint Buddha tells His disciples that the greatest
intentional-suffering can be obtained in your presences if you compel yourselves to be
able to endure the displeasing-manifestations-of-others-towards-yourselves.(BTTHG,
p. 242). We can only approach the understanding of conscious labors and intentional
suffering in the same way that the impulses of Faith, Love, and Hope are approached: not
by saying what they are but by saying what they are not. (See chapter The Legominism
Concerning the Deliberations of the Very Saintly Ashiata Shiemash Under the title of
The Terror of the Situation, pp 353-65).
And since the teaching in Beelzebub is essentially by example, we can also understand
what conscious labors and intentional suffering are by following the examples of beings
like Belcultassi, Hamolinadir, Choon-Kil-Tez and Choon-Tro-Pel, Hadji-Asvatz-Troov,
Makary Kronbernkzion, and many others. Of course, not by imitating what they did
because that by itself violates the injunction Mr. Gurdjieffs grandmother gave to him
before she gave up her soul directly into the hands of His Truthfulness, the Archangel
Gabriel:
Eldest of my grandsons! Listen and always remember my strict injunction to you: In life
never do as others do. Either do nothingjust go to schoolor do something nobody
else does.
We do not imitate what others do; we use their examples as a way of bringing conscious
labors and intentional suffering to our being according to ones individuality. BeingPartkdolg-duty is not a theory but an actualization in our lives. We actualize being-
uncomfortable and all I wanted was to get rids of all those bad feelings; but I could not do
it. I was the slave of my feelings. It was a bad sitting.
I drove to work with my heavy load. After I arrived to my office, my state of being began
to change. My thoughts began to separate themselves from my feelings. For the first time
in almost twenty-four hours I was able to think. One of the first thoughts that came to my
mind was the idea I had read so many times about enduring the displeasing
manifestations of others towards oneself. My thoughts became focus and sharp, to the
point that my negative feelings were gone. The more I thought the more my power of
reasoning somehow was amplified. It was as if the energy that had been driving my
negative emotions had transformed itself and was now driving my power of reasoning.
Through my mind passed a detailed review of all the moments I had thought on enduring
the displeasing manifestations of others towards oneself. I concluded with a final and
simple thought: Given the fact that I had to share part of my life with this person, the
source of my negative feelings, I had better get used to endure his displeasing
manifestations towards me. At that very instant this simple realization became fixed in
my being. I felt liberation. And I also felt sort of an electric current moving through my
head accompanied by a pleasant sensation. I felt so light and good that I even thought of
searching for my colleague and thanking him for having given me the opportunity to
work on myself. That day I gave one of my best lectures. Never again I experienced
negative feelings towards my colleague and from that day on I saw him as a friendly
person. I have to add that the object of my negative feelings did not change; it was my
attitude towards the object that changed.
That evening while driving home I still felt good and my thoughts were still active and
clear, although not as powerful as in the morning. I became centered on the phenomenon
resembling an electric current that had passed through my head during my morning
experience. By association I remembered that I had read in Beelzebubs Tales something
about some psychic chemical results but I could not pinpoint the exact context in which
these words had been used. I resolved to consult my copy of BTTHG as soon as I got
home.
At home I went straight to the Guide & Index to Beelzebubs Tales to His Grandson and
searched under psychic chemical results. Unfortunately, there is nothing listed under
these words. (I later checked again and found out that the entry under which these words
appear is Trentroodianos; but who could remember this word and its connection with
the other three words, that is to say, with psychic chemical results). I had to search
directly into the book. Fortunately, by now I have a good feeling as to where different
materials are more or less located in the book. It was not too difficult to find the place
where the words I was searching for are located. I found the material I was searching for
on pages 242 and 243 of the book. I will now quote the part of that material concerning
this paper. Here is:
and the greatest intentional-suffering can be obtained in your presences if you
compel yourselves to be able to endure the displeasing-manifestations-of-otherstowards-yourselves