Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Tyrone Schiff
History 229
23 February, 2006
Together Forever
In the film, Back to the Future II, the main character, Marty McFly, travels back
from the past to an alternative and different future due to the fact that he had disturbed the
natural order of things in a time before his own. His tampering with the abstract concepts
of space and time had tangible effects on the future he returned to. This scenario broaches
the question of what sort of relationship exists between the past and the present. At first
glimpse, the answer may seem somewhat complex, yet just as Marty McFly came to
realize the inexorable connection that existed between his past and present, so too shall
the contents of this paper depict that deep rooted and unavoidable relationship. There are
not only show the connection between these frames in time, but also the power struggle
that exists in the documenting of history. Due to the fact that the concept of past and
present is so abstract, two empirical cases will be the focal point of this paper. In
particular, this paper will address the trial and execution of John Brown and the
Holocaust. It will be shown that these two historical events inevitably went on to shape a
societal or cultural identity for each that persisted into the present.
past and present, E. E. Evans-Pritchard gives us the following context in which to view
history, “history is the movement by which a society reveals itself as what it is” (Evans-
Schiff 2
Pritchard, 56). This quotation, thus, sets the foundation for the paper, because it asserts
Brown’s body will be discussed. John Brown was an African-American who was going to
be executed during the Civil War. The thing that makes the story of John Brown so
intriguing is the impact that his death had on the society and culture that he was apart of.
During the Civil War, the way in which a corpse was treated started to have sizeable
sacrilegious. However, John Brown recognized that a “war for emancipation could be
viewed as a holy endeavor,” and wished to die for his African-American brethren as a
The governor of Virginia at the time, Wise, “defied those who warned that execution
would turn the traitor Brown into a hero” (Nudelman, 9). Wise was so focused on
depicting Brown as a traitor that he even thought about methods of how to manipulate the
future’s perception of him. By not allowing journalists or the public close to the actual
site of the hanging, and rather surrounding him with military force, Wise tried to
indoctrinate the public with a feeling as though John Brown was a traitor. Others would
argue that this secrecy excites the public more, and thus would become even more
interested in the case of John Brown. This power struggle between depicting what is real
and what someone may want to be real was more than true in Brown’s case.
Schiff 3
The reason that John Brown’s death ultimately went on to shape and mold the
identity of his culture is due to the following passage in Franny Nudelman’s book, John
identity rather than a threat to the state’s identity” (Nudelman, 17). This quote reveals that
during this tumultuous time of war, the only way to relay anything significant was by this
method of self-sacrifice or martyrdom. However, when people took notice of this self-
sacrifice, they rallied behind its cause, because it represented “bravery…and patriotism”
(Nudelman, 14). The people that rallied behind him were sympathizers in the North, but
more so, it was the African-American society that took him in and embraced him. The
actions of John Brown and his attempt to be a martyr for the African-American culture
The implications of this are tremendous. During the Civil War, the slaves were
emancipated. John Brown, although dead, had helped to give these ex-slaves an identity
of their own. This ultimately helped band the culture together and work towards a
common goal of equality due to the fact that they all had a common identity that stemmed
from John Brown and their past. Although not every African-American may know of the
life of John Brown, their past, present, and identity hinge upon his martyr for their
freedom.
[history] is not concerned so much with a succession of events as with the moral
Pritchard, 53). This quote discusses that in relation to one’s identity in the present, it is
The Holocaust is one example of how morals and symbols from the past work to
develop an identity for a society or culture in the present. The Holocaust occurred over
sixty years ago, but people are still as distraught about this calamity today as they were
many years ago. This is because every Jewish person feels connected to this event, and
tries to empathize with it. One way of doing so is by allowing themselves to let the past
The Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. allows all who enter, the opportunity
to learn about the horridness of the Holocaust. Edward T. Linenthal wrote an account that
described how the Holocaust Museum figured out what to display. Linenthal states in one
of his passages, “Visitors enter the world of the death camps, the space becomes tighter
and mean, with a feeling of heavy darkness…there is no escape” (Linenthal, 170). This
museum allows the individual to identify with history, perhaps even their own, and shed
some light on an aspect of their own identity. The reconnection with one’s own roots of
identity is also not only limited to Jewish people, “The faces of many victims, not all
Jews by any means, assault, challenge, accuse, and profoundly sadden visitors throughout
the exhibition” (Linenthal, 174). The consequences of the Holocaust were enormous. It
inevitably affected the entire world due to the scatter that occurred after it, and the
countries that were involved in it. There is no denying that the Holocaust has ultimately
Similar to the John Brown’s case, the Holocaust possessed a power struggle of
representation. In the Holocaust Museum, many of the people in charge of the displays
Schiff 5
were ambivalent to put, “out a lot of Nazi memorabilia. The songs and the banners and
the objects are alluring…Concern that the exhibit could, in effect, unintentionally
glamorize the Nazis…made the naming and design of exhibit segments problematic”
(Linenthal, 199). Although it would never be anyone’s intention to glamorize the Nazis,
it wouldn’t be historically accurate to wipe all of their artifacts away. Therefore, power is
In both of the texts that were discussed, John Brown’s Body and Linenthal’s
“Preserving Memory”, they were similar in the way that they constructed the relationship
between past and present. In both cases, events from the past shape the identity of the
society or culture due to the fact that in each society or culture history is inherent to the
identity of that particular society or culture. The reason why past and present are so
connected is due to the aforementioned statement. Yet, the texts are different in how this
identity is initially constructed. In the case of John Brown, the public rallied around a
martyr who was dying for their cause of freedom, whereas, the Holocaust is an event in
The backbone that holds the connection between the past and present is the fact
that events that occurred in the past cause a societal or cultural identity to be created
which forms and reforms as time goes on into the present. This is true in the empirical
evidence given by John Brown and the Holocaust Museum. Therefore, one is forced to
admit that the relationship between past and present is analogous to a chain that is linked
Bibliography
Linenthal, Edward T. 1995. Chapter Four. In Preserving Memory: The Struggle to Create
Nudelman, Franny. 2004. Introduction; The Blood of Millions; The Blood of Black Men.