Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Academic Year:
Subject Area(s):
Date(s) of Assessment/Re-Sit Board(s):
Name of External Examiner:
Computing
Hong Kong Institute of Technology
Londontec, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Botho University, Botswana
Prague College
2015/16
21 June 2016
Mr Michael Troughton
Please indicate the External Examiners role(s) by including an X in the appropriate box below:
Module Examiner
Award Examiner
Edexcel Examiner
PART TWO: to be completed by ALL External Examiners, both Module & Award.
This Section of the Report is intended to help the University/Validated Partner College monitor
overall standards and assessment processes.
Please delete the Yes or No as appropriate in each Section.
Please use Box 6 to provide us with recommendations for enhancement, and Box 10 where you
have significant concerns about the academic provision which you feel must be addressed to
maintain and enhance quality and standards. You will receive responses to any concerns
mentioned in this Report.
IMPORTANT NOTE: If your Report concerns multi-site collaborative provision arrangements, or
where there are mixed modes of delivery (for example where some of the provision is delivered
through flexible learning, distance learning, e-learning, or work-based mode), please be specific
about the element(s) of provision or particular Partners to which each comment in your Report
refers.
1
Positive Features:
3D Graphics Programming
Marking criteria and ICA specifications were very clear and comprehensive. As always Tyrone provided
very specific, and constructive feedback.
Games Jam
The feedback was good, and constructive. I'm keen to see how this module will evolve as I believe it's an
important introduction for the students into the realities of working as part of a team - more interaction with
other disciplines, and some members taking on specific production roles should be encouraged.
Games Engine Construction
Although focussing on 2D, key components of engine development such as software architecture, AI
concepts and re-use of standard APIS and SDKs are covered, which give a good grounding in the core
principles of engine programming.
Marking criteria and milestones were clear and very comprehensive.
Feedback on the ICA was also good, and constructive and marking seemed fair.
Physics Simulation
Feedback was good, and I liked the idea of the literature review to create a physics based article.
Real-time graphics
Good introduction to a very broad subject, covering most aspects you would expect in a course on real-time
rendering.
Constructive feedback, and the marking criteria were clear although not as comprehensive as the 3D
graphics module.
2
a)
b)
c)
Academic Standards:
Are the threshold academic standards set for the award(s) being
maintained in accordance with the Framework for HE
Qualifications, and applicable subject benchmarks?
Where relevant, does the programme reflect any additional PSRB
requirements?
Is student performance comparable with similar programmes or
subjects in other UK institutions which you are familiar with?
N/A
to my role
N/A
Yes
d)
3
a)
Assessment Process:
Are the assessments appropriate for the subject, the students, the
Yes
respective level of study and the stated learning outcomes?
b) Did you receive an Assessment Report form detailing the internal
N/A
to my role
moderation processes?
c) Were you provided with the opportunity to comment on
N/A
to my role
assessment proposals prior to them being issued?
d) Were the marking criteria properly and consistently applied and is
Yes
the marking of an appropriate standard, fair and reliable?
If you answered No to any of these questions, please provide details in Box 6 or Box 10.
4
a)
to my role
If you answered No to 5a) or 5b), please provide details in Box 6 or Box 10.
6
To keep the content current I would like to see some coverage of physically based rendering, as most
renderers games or otherwise now use some form of PBR.
Marking criteria werent quite as comprehensive as the 3D graphics module.
Notably most of the work samples I checked were marked down on the profiling analysis and write-up,
although the course does seem to cover this in adequate detail. Could just be a result of this being a difficult
area to master in a short time-frame.
7
a)
b)
c)
a)
b)
No
No
No
No
Administrative Processes:
Did you receive the following documentation in a timely manner to allow you to carry out
your duties and responsibilities as an External Examiner?
Sufficient information on the form and content of the assessment
Yes
and the criteria used?
Did you receive samples of student work in accordance with the
Yes
Regulations?
Due to the nature of some of the modules I was assessing, requiring large amounts of data
to be copied onto the workstation from disc usually, this proved to be a bottleneck and
reduced my effectiveness to assess the students work and therefore marking fairness. This
was a particular problem with the computing project and game jam modules.
Id suggest either pre-copying the materials onto the workstation before the assessment
visit, or providing the materials on a faster access device, such as a memory stick.
Also a large number of samples of the students work wouldnt compile due to missing
projects it would have helped to have a short list which have been verified beforehand to
be complete to check. Reading the assessments there werent any problems with compiling
the projects, so I believe this was a problem with not copying all the required materials onto
the disc, or maybe a mismatch in the development environment.
You will be provided with a formal response to all concerns mentioned in this Report.
11 Unsatisfactory Responses to Previous Significant Concerns:
Are you satisfied that any issues or significant concerns raised in your previous
Yes
reports have been appropriately addressed or are in the process of being
resolved?
If No, please provide details here indicating the nature of the concern and when it was
raised.
12
No
No
No
No
When I was first appointed 5 years ago I wasnt given a mentor and did feel a little out of me
depth, I hope this is something that has been addressed now.
15
Additional Comments:
We welcome any additional comments you may wish to make, which have not already been
covered in this report.