rkjb

rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider t intention is rendered ire
but to no availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlawjsdsdvlaw, where tha
bwehrgwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its
language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie
beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
irect expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within the letter of
tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
wehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider t intention is rendered ire
but to no availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlawjsdsdvlaw, where tha
bwehrgwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its
language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie
beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
irect expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within the letter of
tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted d sdn ntion of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe
rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not explicitly provide tfs reconsider
but to no availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is re
bwehrgwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its
language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie
beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not explicitly provide tfs reconsider but to no
availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is re bwehrgwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its
language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie
beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider t intention is rendered ire

but to no availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlawjsdsdvlaw, where tha

bwehrgwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its
language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie
beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider but to no
availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is re bwehrgwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its
language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie
beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider t intention is rendered ire
but to no availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is
rendered doubtful by reason of Qweqwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered jbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider ndered doubtful by reason of Qweqwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered jbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider ct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the
spirit, though not within the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its
language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie
beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider but to no
availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered
doubtful by reason of Qweqwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered jbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider but to no
availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered
doubtful by reason of Qweqwe

sdnjsdsdvlaw, direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its language or of the fact that the garranted
coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie beyond the direct expression of the text,
conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider but to no
availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered
doubtful by reason of Qweqwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered where that intention is rendered doubtful by
reason of the ambiguity in its language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions
respecting subjects that lie beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in
the spirit, though not within the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its
language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie
beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider but to no
availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered
doubtful by reason of Qweqwe
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its
language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie
beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs re sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason
of the ambiguity in its language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions
respecting subjects that lie beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in
the spirit, though not within the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider but to no
availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered
doubtful by reason of consider but to no

availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered

doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its language or of the fact that the given case is not
explicitly provide tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that
lie beyond the direct expression eqweweqhbfjhwvfhwevfhwrverdk sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that
intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its language or of the fact that the
garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie beyond the direct expression of the
text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere
text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider but to no
availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered
doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its language or of the fact that the given case is not
explicitly provide tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that
lie beyond the direct expression jfhdffdsfw.erre
- is the draewrewrwer
wdweqeawing of conclusions
reconsider but Construction is the drawing of conclusions
reconsider but to no availadvzzvtertreteadv
sdnjsdsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its
language or of the fact that the garranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie
beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within
the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFncluweiven case is not
explicitly provide tfs reconsider but to no
availadvzzvsaasdsasdtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered
doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its language or of the fact that the given case is not
explicitly provide tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that
lie beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not
within the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects
that lie beyond the direct expression of the ssddfsdfhe rawing of warranted
coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects that lie beyond the direct expression of the text,
conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.
rkjbwehrgwe
intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects
that lie beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not
within the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere text.

intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting subjects

that lie beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit, though not
within the letter of tertretretthe text.d for in the law.erre
- is the draewrewrwer
wing of warrafsdfnhsfhs
djfbhdbfhsdf
ewtwetwetwdrefwrertretavedwed is the art or process of discovering and expounding the meaning
and intention of the authors of tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFnclusions respecting
subjects that lie beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in the spirit,
though not within the letter of tertretretthe text.
Construction vs. Interpretation:
- Strictly speakindg, construction and interpretation are not the same, although the two terms are
often used interchangeably.
- Construction is the dr- Construction is the drawing of conclusions
reconsider but Construction is the drawing of conclusions
reconsider but to no availadv tfsdfsdfhe rawing of warranted coasffsdfwFnclusions
respecting subjects that lie beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions which are in
the spirit, though not within the letter of tertretrettherwerw3ere
text.zzvtertreteadvsdvlaw, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the
ambiguity in its language or of the fact that the given case is not explicitly provided for in the
ldfdfds
sjfyasfas
jkhfvsgfvhsd

fjdbfjsdbf
nted conclusions respecting subjects that lie beyond the direct expression of the text, conclusions
which are in the spirit, though not within the letter of the text.
to no availadvzzvadvsdvlaFDFDFDSFEEFwew, where that intention is rendered doubtful
by reason of the ambiguity in its language or of the fact that the given case is not explicitly
provided for in the law.
- is the drawing of wefwf

fwerwerwarranted
fdsfsdfdsf conclusions respecting subjects that lie beyond the direct expression of the text,
conclusions which are in the spirit, though not within the letter of the text.
Construction vs. Interpretation:
- Strictly speakinfsdfsddg, construction and interpretation are not the same, although the two terms
are often used interchangeably.

- Construction is the drawing of conclusions

reconsider but tosdf no avail.
Hence the instant petition which seeks to restrain perpetually the
proceedings in Civil Case No. 779-M for lack of jurisdiction on the part
of the trial court.
Issue/s:

WON the US naval base in bidding for said contracts exercise

governmental functions to be able to invoke state immdsvsdvsdfdunity
Ndjkqbejfkwe

reconsider but to no avail.

Hence the instant petition which seeks to restrain perpetually the

proceedings in Civil Case No. 779-M for lack of jurisdiction on the part
of the trial court.
Issue/s:

WON the US naval base

in bidding for said contracts exercise governmental functions to be

able to invoke state immunity
with respect to subjects that are beyond the direct expressions of the text, from the elements
known and given in the text.
wdwfefdewd
- Interpretation, on the other hand, is the process

 is the art or process of discovering and expounding the meaning and intention of the authors of
the law, where that intention is rendered doubtful by reason of the ambiguity in its language or
of the fact that the given case is not explicitly provided for in the law.
- is the drawing of warranted conclusions respecting subjects that lie beyond the direct expression
of the text, conclusions whdede
dewdwedich are in the spirit, though not within the letter of the text.
Construction vs. Interpretation:
- Strictly speaking, construction and interpretation are not the same, although the two terms are
often used interchangeably.
- Construction is the drawing of conclusions with respect to subjects that are beyond the direct
expressions of the text, from the elements known and given in the text.
- Interpretation, on the other hand, is the process