Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
D E S I G N 9 :
O V E R V I E W
Duration: 4-5 50min periods
Teacher(s): Morris
Grade Level: 9
2 0 1 5 B U C K IN S T I T U T E F O R E D U C ATI O N
Success Skills
For more PBL resources visit bie.org
Self-Management
2 0 1 5 B U C K IN S T I T U T E F O R E D U C ATI O N
Collaboration
Driving Question
Entry Event
Students will view Stephan Wolffs TEDtalk, The Path to Ending Ethnic Conflict, and on on online discussion
board state whether or not the agree with the the claim presented in the video and provide an explanation.
Students must respond to two of their peers.
Specific content and success skills to be assessed:
Individual:
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.1.a
BLOG: Reflection
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.2
Formal Writing: Short Position Paper
21CS: 3.1.1
Products
Other:
In collaborative teams students will, conduct research into historic examples of conflict resolution, current realworld attempts at resoling conflict, and pose their own solutions to ongoing conflict in a formal oral
presentation, using any digital platform they choose. Using their Public Speaking Rubrics from Mini-Lesson #8,
will critique other groups prior to sharing their projects with other classes. The presentation artifacts will be
posted to the group BLOG. Individually, students will compose a short position paper where they attempt to
answer whether or no conflict can truly be completely resolved.
NGS: 13
Team:
BLOG: Formal Presentation
P R O J E C T
For more PBL resources visit bie.org
D E S I G N 9 :
O V E R V I E W
page 2
2 0 1 5 B U C K IN S T I T U T E F O R E D U C ATI O N
Making Products Public Individual products will to posted to students reflective BLOGs, whereas the presentations will be curated in the
(include how the
group BLOG. Students are presenting their findings to other classes.
products will be made
public and who students
will engage with
during/at end of project)
Resources Needed
Reflection Methods
(how individual, team,
and/or whole class will
reflect during/at end of
project)
Focus Group
Whole-Class Discussion
Fishbowl Discussion
Survey
Other:
Notes:
1.
2 0 1 5 B U C K IN S T I T U T E F O R E D U C ATI O N