Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
AGREEMENTS IN INDIA
SUBMITTED TO:
Ms. Apoorvi Shrivastava
(FACULTY, CORPORATE TAXATION)
SUBMITTED BY:
Surabhi Maheshwari
SECTION VIII/B
ROLL. 160
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to the faculty advisor for the project
Ms. Apoorvi Shrivastava for allowing me to work on this topic and for her support and
encouragement throughout the project.
I would also like to thank the internet sources and the various authors whose books helped me
in researching for the project. I would also like to thank my seniors for their support.
At last I would like thank my batch mates and my parents for their valuable criticisms and
support which has helped in modifying the project to its best.
SURABHI MAHESHWARI
Roll no.160
Semester VIII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Content
Page No.
Introduction
11
Conclusion
13
References
14
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This Doctrinal research is descriptive and analytical in nature. Secondary and Electronic
resources have been largely used to gather information and data about the topic.
Books and other reference as guided by Faculty have been primarily helpful in giving this
project a firm structure. Websites, dictionaries and articles have also been referred.
Footnotes have been provided wherever needed, to acknowledge the sources
Intr
od
uct
ion
The
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt is an
agreeme
nt which
helps the
taxpayer
to
get
relief
from
double
taxation
on
the
same
income.
If India
has
signed
any
double
taxation
agreeme
nt
with
any
foreign
country;
it's
meant
that the
taxpayer
of those
countries
does not
have
to
pay
the
tax
on
the same
income
in
both
the
countries
.
So,
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt is a
useful
tool
which
helps the
taxpayer
to avoid
"double
taxation"
. In case
of
claiming
relief
under
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt
two
importan
t things
are
needed
t
o
f
i
n
d
o
u
t
.
T
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
:
1.
The
cou
ntry
of
resi
den
ce.
2.
T
h
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
c
o
u
n
t
r
y
.
Here "the
country
of
residence
" means
where the
assessee
resides
and
the
source
country is
any
foreign
country
other
than
where he
resides,
but
the
asseesee
earn
some
income
from that
foreign
state.
In
that case
if the two
countries
does not
sign any
DTAA
then the
assess
has
to
pay tax in
both the
state i.e.
the
country
of
his
residence
as well as
the
source
country,
this
is
why
double
taxation
avoidanc
e is so
much
important
.
The
project
will have
a
detail
study on
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreemen
t in India.
Ch
apt
er
1Do
ubl
e
Tax
ati
on
Av
oid
an
ce
Agr
ee
me
nt:
An
An
aly
sis
In
this
chapter I
will
discuss
the
meaning
and the
concept
of
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt
or
"DTAA"
. I will
also
analyze
the
effective
ness
or
importan
ce of the
DTAA.
Basicall
y
Double
Taxation
Avoidan
ce
Agreeme
nt is a
"bilatera
l
agreeme
nt"
between
two
countries
to avoid
"double
taxation
of same
income".
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
:
If
there
is
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt
between
India
and
other
foreign
country
then
it
restricts
taxation
of
the
same
income
in
both
countries
.
India has
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt
with
84
countries
.
It
means a
person
does not
give tax
of
the
same
income
in India
or any of
those
countries
.
DTAA is
an
essential
tool
to
avoid
double
taxation
of
the
same
income
in
different
countries
.
T
h
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
o
f
D
T
A
A
c
a
n
b
e
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
e
d
b
y
u
s
i
n
g
a
h
y
p
o
t
h
e
t
i
c
a
l
e
x
a
m
p
l
e
:
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
:
A person
who
lives in a
foreign
country
and
maintain
s
an
NRO
account
(non
resident
ordinary
account)
in India;
so
the
interest
he
gets
from
this
NRO
account
is
appearin
g
as
"NRIs
income
originate
d
in
India". If
India
and this
foreign
country
where
the
person
lives are
binding
with
Double
taxation
avoidan
ce
agreeme
nt
then
this
income
will
be
taxed
accordin
g to the
specified
rate
prescribe
d in the
DTAA.
So
the
main
purpose
of
the
DTAA is
to
provide
benefit
to
the
assesses
.1 When
two
countries
entering
into
Double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt
then
the
provisio
ns which
are laid
down in
DTAA
override
s
the
1 NRI
TAX
SERVICE
S,availabl
e at
http://ww
w.nritaxse
rvices.co
m/ (Last
Visited on
4th April,
2016)
provisio
ns
of
Tax Law
of
particula
r
country.
In India
also the
provisio
n
of
DTAA
override
s
the
income
tax
provisio
ns.
Accordi
ng
to
section
90 (2) of
the
income
tax act ,
assessee
can
choose
whether
he
will
go with
the
DTAA
provisio
ns
or
with the
Income
Tax act.
Assessee
can
decide
whichev
er
is
more
beneficia
l2.
Article
265
of
the Indian
constituti
on stated
that
"no
tax shall
be levied
or
collected
except by
authority
of
law".
To avoid
any
confusion
The
Income
2 id
Tax Act,
1961
enacted
clear
provision
s
to
confer
"the
power of
the
central
governm
ent
to
enter into
agreemen
ts
with
foreign
countries
for
the
avoidanc
e
of
Double
taxation
as
contained
in
Chapter 9
of
the
Income
tax Act."3
Section
90
and
section
91 of the
income
tax
act,
1961,
these two
provision
s
deals
with
double
taxation.
Section
90
and
section
91
are
very
helpful
3 INDIA'S
DOUBLE
TAXATIO
N
AVOIDAN
CE
AGREEME
NT,
available at
http://www.
incometaxi
ndia.gov.in/
publication
s/6_Advan
ce_Rulings
/Chapter07.
asp (Last
Visited on
4th April,
2016)
provision
in
this
regards
which
save
taxpayers
from
double
taxation.
Section
90 of the
Income
Tax Act,
1961
talking
about
"those
taxpayers
who have
paid the
tax to a
country
with
which
India has
signed
DTAA"4
On
the
other
4 The
Income
Act,1961
90
hand
section
91
is
talking
about
"those
taxpayers
who have
paid
tax
to
country
which
does not
have any
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreemen
t
with
India.
That
is
how
Indian
income
tax
act
takes
care
of
these two
different
types of
taxpayers
.
When
India
enters
into
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreemen
t
with
any
foreign
country,
by
such
agreemen
t
they
mutually
determin
ed the tax
rate.
It
protects
the
interest
of
taxpayers
.
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
H
is
to
r
y
In 1899
Prussia
and
Austro
Hungari
an
Empire
for
the
first time
entered
into the
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt. In the
13th
century
first time
the
double
taxation
relating
issue
was
raised
among
France
and Italy.
The
issue
was "the
property
to
be
taxed
was
situated
in
one
state but
the
owner of
the
property
was
resident
of
the
state."8
The
concept
of
providin
the
relief
from
double
taxation
comes
on
the
scene in
1939
when the
incometax
(double
taxation
relief)
(Indian
states)
rules
were
framed.
It
was
felt that
the
necessity
to have a
model
agreeme
nt which
can be a
good
reference
in
framing
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt
between
two
foreign
states.
That
is
how The
League
of
Nations
introduc
ed
the
first
model
bilateral
conventi
on
in
1928.
After
that
in
1943 the
model
conventi
on
of
Mexico
and
in
1946 the
London
model
conventi
on
was
getting
introduc
ed. Later
in 1956
the
council
of
the
organiza
tion for
Europea
n
economi
c
cooperati
on
establish
ed
fiscal
committ
ee
to
formulat
e
model
conventi
on.
In
1963 for
the very
first time
the first
draft
"double
taxation
conventi
on
on
income
and
capital
was
enacted.
Finally
in 1977
OECD
model
conventi
on
and
comment
aries
come
into
existence
. In 1992
OECD
publishe
d model
conventi
on5.
D
T
A
A
a
n
d
T
h
e
I
n
c
o
5
INDIA'S
DOUBLE
TAXATIO
N
AVOIDA
NCE
AGREEM
ENT,
available
at
http://ww
w.incomet
axindia.go
v.in/public
ations/6_
Advance_
Rulings/C
hapter07.a
sp (Last
Visited on
4th April,
2016)
m
e
T
a
x
A
c
t
The
main aim
of
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt is to
provide
relief to
the
taxpayer
from
double
taxation.
A
country
entered
into
DTAA
with
foreign
state
so
that; by
this
agreeme
nt it can
prevent
double
taxation
of same
income
in
different
country.
In India,
section
90
and
section
91 of the
income
tax
act
deals
with the
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt. Now
in
this
chapter I
will
to
try
find
out what
happene
d
when
any
of
the
provision
s of the
Double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt clash
with any
section
of
the
Income
tax
act6
and
which
provision
s should
prevail
over
another?
Section
90 (2) of
the
Income
Tax Act,
1961
explain
6 The
Income
Act,1961
90
that
if
India has
a DTAA
with any
other
foreign
country
then it is
the
assessee
who will
decide
that
which
provision
is
more
beneficia
l
for
them
and that
provisio
n
will
apply
accordin
gly.
In
the
famous
case CIT
vs.
VISAK
HAPAT
NAM
PORT
TRUST7
first time
"the rule
under
section
90
(2)"
was
recognis
ed
by
Andhra
Pradesh
High
Court.
After
that
in
the
famous
case
UNION
OF
INDIA
vs.
AZADI
BACHA
O
ANDOL
7 Available
at
http://www.
indiankano
on.org/doc/
865397/
(Last
Visited on
4th April,
2016)
ON8, the
supreme
court of
India
recognis
ed
the
same.
H
o
w
it
w
o
r
k
s
?
To save
a
taxpayer
from
being
doubly
taxed in
respect
of
the
same
income,
the
concept
of
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt
got
introduc
ed.
If
two
countries
have
signed in
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt
both
countries
tax
payers
get
benefit
from it.
India
is
not
an
exceptio
n to it.
Currentl
y
India
has
signed
double
taxation
avoidanc
e
agreeme
nt
with
87
countries
.
This
agreeme
nt
is
very
effective
for
the
taxpayer
who has
income
in
another
foreign
country
other
than
where he
resides.
By
the
help
of
this
agreeme
nt
taxpayer
can
be
protecte
d
from
giving
tax
of
the same
income
in
two
times.
The
double
taxation
can
be
avoided
by
followin
g
manners:
1. T
h
e
c
o
u
nt
ry
w
h
er
e
th
e
ta
x
p
a
y
er
re
si
d
es
,
ca
n
e
x
e
m
pt
th
e
in
c
o
m
e
w
hi
c
h
is
c
o
m
in
g
fr
o
m
fo
re
ig
n
c
o
u
nt
ri
es
.
O
r,
2.
T
h
e
c
o
u
nt
ry
w
h
er
e
th
e
ta
x
p
a
y
er
re
si
d
es
,
"g
ra
nt
th
e
cr
e
di
t
fo
r
th
e
ta
x
p
ai
d
in
a
n
ot
h
er
fo
re
ig
n
co
u
nt
ry
".
The rules
of
the
agreemen
t depend
on
the
mutual
agreemen
t of the
two
states, so
the
DTAA
provision
will
apply in
the
countries
who have
signed
the same
agreemen
t. DTAA
can
be
different
from one
country
to
another.
In
the
general
case
when
two
countries
have
signed
the
Double
Taxation
Avoidanc
e
Agreeme
nt
then
the
"source
country"
gets
the
right
to
tax
by
using the
relevant
provision
s of the
taxation
law
of
that
country
and
thereafter
"the
country
of
residence
"
grants
"credit"
for
tax
also
apply low
tax rate.9
Example
:
Suppose
in
our
country
(India)
the
tax
rate
applies
on
the
long term
capital
gain
is
20% and
the
tax
rate
of
the
country
where the
assesee
resides is
30% then
in
that
case only
10% tax
will
be
charged
on
that
income.
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
f
o
r
t
a
x
i
n
g
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
i
n
c
o
m
e
u
n
d
e
r
D
T
A
A
S
O
U
R
C
E
O
F
I
N
C
O
M
E
H
O
W
I
T
I
S
T
A
X
E
D
SALARY
Most of
the
DTAA
provides
if a
person
lives
I
N
C
D
I
V
I
D
E
N
D
I
N
T
E
R
E
S
T
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
A
c
c
o
r
di
n
g
to
m
o
st
o
f
th
e
D
T
A
A
,
b
u
si
n
e
ss
profits can
be taxed
only when
it comes
from a
permanent
establishme
nt.
In case of
dividend,
the source
country has
a
right to tax.
at 30%.
DTAA could
According
not help to DTAAs
much in interest
case.
receive
from bank
In India in
case of deposits
should be
interest which
is earned taxed at a
from bank"concession
al rate" of
deposit then
tax can be10-15 %.
applied on
ROYAL
TY AND
FEE
FOR
TECHNI
CAL
In India
in this
case the
tax rate
is 25%
but in
I
M
M
O
V
A
B
L
E
In
ca
se
of
re
nt
ea
rn
fro
m
im
m
ov
ab
le
pr
op
ert
y
the "source
country" has
the right to tax.
In case of
income which
comes from
the sale of
immovable
property,
according to
most of
DTAAs "the
country
where the
property is
situated has
the right to
tax."
Treaty Shopping
Treaty Shopping
Treaty shopping is another example of misuse of DTAA. It means when an assessee wants to do "a
transaction through another country which has most beneficial treaty with India in order to reduce
his tax liability."
Example: Indo-Mauritius Treaty.
In India 40% of the total FDI comes through Mauritius, because according to the Indo Mauritius
DTAA, tax levied on capital gain as per the law of the country of the residence of the assessee.
But according to the tax law on Mauritius there is no tax imposed on capital gains; because of
which all the investment in India from the different country comes through the Mauritius.
In the famous case Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan 11; it was held that if the aim of the
DTAA was not to include a person of third country and restricts him/her from taking "the benefit
out of the favourable terms", then there should be an another provision about it. Parliament has a
duty to take care of it in this regard; and if there is no specific provision and limitation mentioning
DTAA; then "no one can be denied benefit of the favourable tax provision in the belief that treaty
8 Available at
http://law.incometaxindia.gov.in/DitTaxmann/incometaxacts/2007itact/
%5B2003%5D263ITR0706%28SC %29.htm (Last Visited on 4th April,
2016)
9 DTAA,available at http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/how-treaties-with-
shopping is prohibited."
Conclusion
So from the above study it can be said Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement is very much
helpful for avoiding double taxation not only that double taxation avoidance agreement can over
ride the Income Tax act; if it is beneficial for the assessee. But it should not be used in wrong
manners like to promote double non taxation or to unnecessarily or illegally reduce the tax
liability or treaty shopping. It is essential that the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements
should have a clear provision which prevent DTAA from misuse (example: provision for anti
treaty shopping etc).
So to conclude it can be said the Double taxation avoidance agreement should be used for good
purpose like for the beneficial of the assessee or to prevent a person from being taxed twice for
the same income it should not be misused.
REFERENCES
ARTICLES
SHARMENDRA
CHAUDHRY,
DOUBLE
TAXATION
AVOIDANCE
WEB SITES
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/34/1914467.pdf
http://www.unclefed.com/ForTaxProfs/Treaties/india.pdf