Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Our ideas about country people often obscure the remarkable variety of
things they do and the strategies and abilities they employ in doing them.
Our constructs render much o f village life invisible.
There are several ways o f outlining the magnitude o f this problem.
One is to remind ourselves that, until recently, half the peasant population
was invisible, due to its gender. As a result, the interplay between
household production and reproduction was not well conceptualized or
investigated.2
Another way to uncover what is normally invisible in peasant life is to
discuss commercialization, a topic that has been heavily mythologized by
intellectuals around the world. Peasants are generally thought to be
ignorant, defensive, exploited, and resistant to new markets and
technologies. Often they are portrayed as helpless victims rather than
active agents, and thus exoticized as people without commercial
traditions or motivations. As Richard Wilk mentions in Chapter 6,
incorporation into the modem world economy is drought to rapture their
lives.
These ideas may be valid in certain cases for specific reasons, but they
should be questioned as universal principles of analysis. Based on old
assumptions, they have been shaped in contemporary discourse by
several currents: by romantic nostalgia for the "moral economy" o f the
premodem world; by the postmodern aesthetic and its tendency to
exoticize "the other"; and by the long-standing influence o f Marx and
Lenin.3 This paper focuses mainly on the latter.
In volume I, chapter 27, o f Das ICapital (1867), Marx explained how
small peasants were victimized by capitalist development in England and
Scotland. His main objective was to show how the forceful expropriation
o f common lands drove peasants out o f villages and into the nascent
urban proletariat Nothing was said here about the ability o f small
peasants to survive otherwise, absent expropriation; but this subject was
brought up in volume III, where Marx discussed various causes o f the
>
by Polly Hill (1963, 1970) and others; yet this case apparently has little
effect on his basic assumptions.
Other evidence, published after Harts book, suggests that he saw only
what he expected when looking at West African peasants. According to
Janet MacGaffey,
. . . in Nigeria the official assessment of die stagnation and decline of
agriculture conceals a major and dynamic change in the development of
Nigerian capitalism: the dramatic expansion of commercial agriculture to
supply the domestic food market. . . [Beckman] refers to this phenomenon
as 'the new food frontier,1and stresses that foe backbone of such expansion
has been peasant small-holder production. It is small peasant formers who
provide the bulk of foe food for the non-agricultural population
(MacGaffey 1991:30, citing Beckman 1988:36).
Hart is also selective in his use o f evidence from other parts o f foe world.
He draws comparisons between West African and Asian peasants, yet he
foils to note foe implications o f foe "green revolution" achieved by small
formers in many regions o f Asia.14 To suggest, as Hart does, that
smallholder cash cropping cannot lead to "labor specialization, capital
investment, and productive innovation in the sphere o f technology and
organization" (1982:157) is directly contrary to foe evidence cited above.
However, you dont need to be a African expert to misread or ignore
the evidence on peasant dynamism in Asia: there are plenty of Asian
experts to do that. The most pertinent example here is Jan Breman's
(1985) O f Peasants, M igrants and Paupers, which is concerned with
Surat district in Gujarat, foe same area described by Fryer in 1679.
Because Breman's study concentrates on migration, pauperization, and
class polarization, he chooses to focus exclusively on two classes: "foe
dominant landowners" and "the landless proletariat Thus he ignores foe
activities o f small formers almost entirely. As he says in an introductory
chapter, the smaller landowners
. . . are not the principal actors in the social dynamic which has arisen, and
for this reason they will be largely left out of consideration in the
remainder of this study. . . . 1 regard the term 'peasants' as still being
appropriate to this class because of their hesitant and defensive reaction to
the situation which has come into being. Without much hope of
improvement, they try as far as possible to protect themselves from foe
negative consequences of this process of change, and on foe whole they
have been reasonably successful in this (Breman 1985:60).
ECONOMIC
ANALYSIS
BEYOND THE
LOCAL SYSTEM
Monographs in Economic Anthropology, No. 13
Edited by
Richard E. Blanton
Peter N. Peregrine
Deborah Winslow
Thomas D. Hall
UNIVERSITY
PRESS OF
AMERICA
L anham N ew Y ork * L o n d o n
Copyright 1997 by
Society for Economic Anthropology
U niversity Press o f Am erica, Inc.
4720 Boston Way
Lanham, Maryland 20706
3 Henrietta Street
London, WC2E 8LU England
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States o f America
British Cataloging in Publication Information Available
Co-published by arrangement with the Society for Economic
Anthropology
Contents
Introduction: Economic Analysis Beyond the Local System
and Back Again
Richard E. Blanton, Deborah Winslow, Peter N. Peregrine,
and Thomas D. Hall
13
43
71
87
0 " ' The paper used in this publication meets the minimum
requirements of American National Standard for information
SciencesPermanence o f Paper for Printed Libraty Materials,
ANSI Z39.48 1984
97
109
Introduction
125
147
171
197
209
235
255
291
C ontributors
317
iv