Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 14

Department of Geosciences

Comparing vegetation response in southern, central


and northern California during the 1997-1998 and
2015-2016 El Nio

Austin Schneiderman1, David Miller2, Dar Roberts2


1Mississippi

State University, Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State, MS


University of California at Santa Barbara, CA

Project Outline

Research motivation
Initial questions /objectives
Quick look at 97-98 & 15-16 El Nio's
Methods
Results
Conclusions

Research Motivation

California drought is arguably getting worse.. (extreme since 2011)*


Policy improvement?

Regional/local scale impacts will be measured


Study specific regions of interest in California?

Differences in these two events may provide insight to future events


How are El Nio impacts changing in California?

Assess drought impacts and evolution in California


How does drought change throughout an enhanced hydrologic cycle?

October-June

Godzilla vs. 1997-1998 Nio


Precipitation distribution
1997/1998:

2015/2016:

Godzilla vs. 1997-1998 Nio


SSTAs:

Godzilla vs. 1997-1998 Nio


500mb height and anomalies:

Godzilla vs. 1997-1998 Nio

Methods
1. Choose locations of interest
2. Data acquisition
LANDSAT TM/OLI for 97/98 and
15/16
12 scenes for processing

3. ENVI processing
Veg. response calculated by looking
at total change in NPV, GV and Soil
VIPER Tools 2 (CRES, SMA)

Santa Barbara 1997-1998


1997
R: 0.66 m
G: 0.56 m
B: 0.48 m

R: NPV
G: GV
B: SOIL

= V98 V97

1998

dGV_total = +3841.2 km
dNPV_total = -3432.6 km
dSOIL_total = -692.8 km

Santa Barbara 2015-2016


2015
R: 0.66 m
G: 0.56 m
B: 0.48 m

R: NPV
G: GV
B: SOIL

= V98 V97

2016

dGV_total = +1450.6 km
dNPV_total = -1728.4 km
dSOIL_total = +1051 km

Change in Soil, NPV and GV through time


4000

3841.2

Area of change in km^2

3000

2000

1450.6
1051

1000

1024.8
709.8

698.1
250.094
4.4

-1000

-491.97

-692.771

1397.7

1206.3

477.166

-571.9

-935.9
-1728.4

-2000

-3000

-3432.6
-4000

SoCal - 97/98

CeCal - 97/98

NoCal - 97/98

15.3

dSOIL
dNPV
dGV

Conclusions
Reaffirms the need to improve water use policy in California
over next decade
Impacts in NoCal did not have much variation, SoCal site did

Grass and shrubs were impacted by the rain much more than the highly
dense forests
Geographic location of NoCal keeps region fairly wet

Gradient between CeCal/SoCal is interesting due to their


proximity
The Future for strong El Ninos

Enhanced precip. transitioning to enhanced drought for central/southern


California
If SSTs continue to rise, the next strong El Nino could be even more
drought inducing for southern California

Acknowledgments
Dr. Dar Roberts
David Miller
Land Group
Dr. Emily Schaller
NSERC
SARP 2016
Alex Kotsakis
Barry Lefer

Future Work
Calculate dGV, NPV and Soil over entire
state
Measure dGV, NPV and Soil during
moderate and weak El Ninos as well
Use same methods over another site that
receives enhanced precipitation

Вам также может понравиться