Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Project Outline
Research motivation
Initial questions /objectives
Quick look at 97-98 & 15-16 El Nio's
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Research Motivation
October-June
2015/2016:
Methods
1. Choose locations of interest
2. Data acquisition
LANDSAT TM/OLI for 97/98 and
15/16
12 scenes for processing
3. ENVI processing
Veg. response calculated by looking
at total change in NPV, GV and Soil
VIPER Tools 2 (CRES, SMA)
R: NPV
G: GV
B: SOIL
= V98 V97
1998
dGV_total = +3841.2 km
dNPV_total = -3432.6 km
dSOIL_total = -692.8 km
R: NPV
G: GV
B: SOIL
= V98 V97
2016
dGV_total = +1450.6 km
dNPV_total = -1728.4 km
dSOIL_total = +1051 km
3841.2
3000
2000
1450.6
1051
1000
1024.8
709.8
698.1
250.094
4.4
-1000
-491.97
-692.771
1397.7
1206.3
477.166
-571.9
-935.9
-1728.4
-2000
-3000
-3432.6
-4000
SoCal - 97/98
CeCal - 97/98
NoCal - 97/98
15.3
dSOIL
dNPV
dGV
Conclusions
Reaffirms the need to improve water use policy in California
over next decade
Impacts in NoCal did not have much variation, SoCal site did
Grass and shrubs were impacted by the rain much more than the highly
dense forests
Geographic location of NoCal keeps region fairly wet
Acknowledgments
Dr. Dar Roberts
David Miller
Land Group
Dr. Emily Schaller
NSERC
SARP 2016
Alex Kotsakis
Barry Lefer
Future Work
Calculate dGV, NPV and Soil over entire
state
Measure dGV, NPV and Soil during
moderate and weak El Ninos as well
Use same methods over another site that
receives enhanced precipitation