Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

IBLT Assignment

Case Analysis: NTPC Vs Singer


Company

Submitted By:
Venkatesh .V (1226115141)
Sunil Kumar (1226114140)
Shabaaz Hassan (122611535)

Case Analysis: National Thermal Power Corp Vs


Singer Company
Citation:
National Thermal Power Corp .V. Singer co& ors. (1993 AIR 998, 1992 SCC (3)
551, 1992 SCR (3) 106, 1992 SCALE (1) 1034, JT 1992 (3) 198), 07-05-1992.

Introduction:
This case is about a two agreement between the parties i.e. appellant
Corporation and Respondent Company on 17.08.1992 at New Delhi for supply of
equipment on erections and Commissioning of certain works in India. In this case
the plaintiff is NTPC and the Respondent is Singer. The entire case revolves
around agreement was governed by the provisions relating to which contract. If
any disputes arise, for arbitration which arbitrators comes into picture and which
contract governs the law whether it is Arbitration ACT 1940 or Foreign Awards
(Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961.

Facts of the case:


The NTPC and the Singer entered into two formal agreements at New Delhi. The
agreement expressly stated that the proper law of the contract is the law in force
in India and the Courts of Delhi shall have exclusive jurisdiction in all matters
arising under this Contract. It also provided for settlement of disputes by
arbitration. The contract did not refer to the law governing the arbitration
agreement. The dispute which arose between the parties was referred to an
Arbitral Tribunal constituted in terms of the rules of arbitration of the ICC Court
(the ICC Rules). In accordance with Article 12 of those Rules, the ICC Court
chose London to be the place of arbitration. The fundamental question is in the
absence of parties specifying which law applies to the arbitration clause; it is
governed by the proper law of the contract. Thus in this case, the lex arbitri was
the ICC rules, the lex loci arbitri would be English Laws and the proper law of the
contract was Indian Law.
The appellants submitted that admittedly the proper law of the contract is the
law in force in India. The arbitration agreement is contained in a clause of that
contract. In the absence of any stipulation to the contrary, the contract has to be
seen as a whole and the parties must be deemed to have intended that the
substantive law applicable to the arbitration agreement is exclusively the law
which governs the main contract. In respect of procedural matters, the
competent Courts in England will also be, concurrently with the Indian Courts,
entitled to exercise jurisdiction over the conduct of arbitration by the ICC Rules
by which the parties have agreed to abide. The substantive law governing
arbitration, which concerns questions like capacity, validity, effect and

interpretation of the contract etc., is Indian law and the competent Courts in
such matters are the Indian Courts.
Singer contended that the arbitration agreement is a separate and distinct
contract, and collateral to the main contract. Although the main contract is
governed by the laws in force in India, there is no express statement as regards
the law governing the arbitration agreement. In the circumstances, the law
governing the arbitration agreement is not the same law which governs the
contract, but it is the law which is in force in the country in which the arbitration
is being conducted. The place of arbitration is an important factor. London having
been chosen in accordance with the ICC Rules to be the seat of arbitration,
English law is the proper law of arbitration, and all proceedings connected
With it are governed by that law and exclusively within the jurisdiction of the
English Courts. This is the view that lex loci arbitri prevails.
The court held that the where the intention of the parties is not clear, the Courts
endeavour to impute an intention by identifying the legal system with which the
transaction has its closest and most real connection. The mere selection of a
particular place for submission to the jurisdiction of the Courts or for the conduct
of arbitration will not, in the absence of any other relevant connecting factor with
that place, be sufficient to draw an inference as to the intention of the parties to
be governed by the system of law prevalent in that place. In the absence of an
express selection, the applicable law has to be discovered by applying sound
ideas of business, convenience and sense to the language of the contract itself.
For this the learned judge propounded the objective test in determining what the
applicable law would be. The court has to determine the proper law for the
parties in such circumstances by putting himself in the place of a reasonable
man. He has to determine the intention of the parties by asking himself how a
just and reasonable person would have regarded the problem. Another
important factor to be borne in mind was the system of law with which the
transaction has its closest and most real connection.
The parties have the freedom to choose the law governing an international
commercial arbitration agreement- the substantive law governing the arbitration
agreement as well as the procedural law governing the conduct of the
arbitration. Such choice is exercised cither expressly or by implication. The
validity, effect and interpretation of the arbitration agreement are governed by
its proper law.
Thus the position of law as laid down by Singer case on this matter may be
stated as follows:
That the proper law of the arbitration agreement is normally the same as
the proper law of the contract. It is only in exceptional cases that it is not
so.
Where, however, there is no express choice of the law governing the
contract as a whole, or the arbitration agreement as such, a presumption
may arise that the law of the country where the arbitration is agreed to

be held is the proper law of the arbitration agreement as well as the


proper law of the contract. But that is only a rebuttable presumption.
The appropriate Courts of the seat of arbitration will have jurisdiction in
respect of procedural matters concerning the conduct of arbitration.
The Courts of the country whose substantive laws govern the arbitration
agreement are the competent Courts in respect of all matters arising
under the arbitration agreement, and the jurisdiction exercised by the
Courts of the seat of arbitration is merely concurrent and not exclusive
and strictly limited to matters of procedure.
All other matters in respect of the arbitration agreement fall within the
exclusive competence of the Courts of the country whose laws govern the
arbitration agreement.
It is now firmly established that the arbitration clause that creates the obligation
of the parties to submit disputes to arbitration, and to abide by the award of a
tribunal constituted in accordance with the terms of the arbitration is capable of
surviving the termination of the substantive agreement in which such a clause is
embedded. It is also susceptible of premature termination by express or implied
consent, and it may therefore be governed by a proper law of its own. The
substantive law of the contract need not govern it.

Principle of Law:
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Power to party to appoint new arbitrator or in certain cases, a sole arbitrator.
Where an arbitration agreement provides that a reference shall be to two
arbitrators, one to be appointed by each party, then, unless a different intention
is expressed in the agreement,(a) If either of the appointed arbitrators neglects or refuses to act, or is incapable
of acting, or dies, the party who appointed him may appoint a new arbitrator in
his place;
(b) if one party fails to appoint an arbitrator, either originally or by way of
substitution as aforesaid, for fifteen clear days- after the sense by the other party
of a notice in writing to make the appointment, such other party having
appointed his arbitrator before giving the notice, the party who has appointed
an. arbitrator may appoint that arbitrator to act as sole arbitrator in the
reference, and his award shall be binding on both parties as if he had been
appointed by consent: Provided that the Court may set aside any appointment as
sole arbitrator made under clause (b) and either, on sufficient cause being.

Judgement as per the court of Law:


The National Thermal Power Corporation appeals from the judgement of the
Delhi High Court in FAO (OS) No. 102 /90 dismissing the NTPCs application filed

under sections 14 , 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act , 1940 (No.X of 1940) to set
aside an interim award made at London by a tribunal constituted by the
International court of Arbitration of the International chamber of Commerce in
terms of the contract made at New Delhi between the NTPC and the respondent
the Singer Company for supply of equipment, erection and commissioning of
certain works in India. The High court held that the award was not governed by
the Arbitration Act, 1940. The arbitration agreement on which the award was not
governed by the law of India, the award fell within the ambit of the Foreign
Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 London being the seat of
arbitration, English courts alone had jurisdiction to set aside the award; and, the
Delhi High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain filed under the Arbitration Act,
1940.

Related case References:


Dicey & Morris: The Conflict of Laws, 11th Edn. Vol.I
p.539, referred to.
The validity, effect and interpretation of the arbitration agreement are governed
by its proper law. Such law will decide whether the arbitration clause is wide
enough to cover the dispute between the parties. Such law will also ordinarily
decide whether the arbitration clause binds the parties even when one of them
alleges that the contract is void, or voidable or illegal or that such contract
has been discharged by breach or frustration.

Conclusion:
Thus we see that the courts give a liberal interpretation to the arbitration clauses
and uphold such a clause inspite of anomalous wording and inconsistencies. The
rationale seems to be that the intention of the parties must be upheld and when
the parties agree to submit their disputes to such a third party, or an institution
to arbitrate upon, if the deeds or language employed by the parties manifest
such this intention clause must be upheld except in cases of a fundamental
deviation from the requirements. S. 7 of the Act allows the parties to tailor the
arbitration clause or agreement, as the case may be, to suit their transactions.
However certain mandatory requirements are to be fulfilled. A wide
interpretation is given as regards the meaning of dispute to which arbitration
clause may be applied.
The validity of an arbitration agreement may thus be seen as of crucial
importance. Where the agreement to arbitrate is contained in an arbitration
clause, it is recognised that it has its own autonomous existence, independent of
the main contract. An arbitration clause, however comprehensive in terms, can
be operative only if the contract is in existence. The arbitration clause would
perish in case where either there is substitution of a new contract, or rescission
or alteration of the original contract.

An arbitration clause is a collateral term of a contract as distinguished from its


substantive terms; but nonetheless it is an integral part of it. But in case the
Arbitration is likely to depend on considerations which have no connection with
the dispute between the parties; it is sometimes chosen by the arbitrators and
sometimes chosen because it is neutral in that it is not the home of either of the
parties. Therefore it is capricious to hold that the law of the place of arbitration is
also, necessarily, the law applicable to the issues in dispute. There is a
presumption that the proper law of the contract is also the law governing the
arbitration clause. The position of the law as established is that the courts must
adopt a reasonable man approach and apply that system of law with which the
transaction has its closest and most real connection.

References:

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/633347/
http://legalsutra.com/212/adr-arbitration-clause-%E2%80%93separability-and-law-applicable/
http://india.lawi.asia/national-thermal-power-corporation-vsinger-company-and-ors/
http://practicalacademic.blogspot.in/2012/07/choice-of-proper-law-of-arbitration.html